Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIONEQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW BOARD
PHOENIX, AZSEPTEMBER 25, 1980
c$ 1 pepyg'~R 4Doc~g~+ eroeg~ i05pagg~8('Ag(
I
f
4I'
1980
J F M A M J J A 0 N J F M A
1981
A S D J F M A M
1982
J J A S
PVNGSLICENSING
CESSAR START PR EP
DOCKET FOR SYS REV
PVNGS DOCKET
NR C STARTDEDICATEDREVIEW
.PVNGSFUEL"LOAD
DC POWER
AC POWER
AUXILiARYFEEDWATER
EQUIPMENTQUAL IFICATION
BOP IRC 0 CI
LEGEND:
REVIEW BOARD MEETING
Q TRANSCRIPT TO NRC
0 RESPONSES TO ACTION ITEMS TO NRC
0 BOARD COMMENTSOR RESPONSESTO NRC
Q FINAL RESPONSES TO ACTION ITEMS TO NRC(IF RED'0)
LICENSING EVENT
FIREPROTECTION
CONTROL ROOMDESIGN
'REVIBN BOARDSCHEDULE'FIGURE
1'
,
e
EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW BOARD AGENDA
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
A, PVNGS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
B, INPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN CRITERIA FOR
EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION
C, SCOPE OF PVNGS QUALIFICATION
D, PROJECT MILESTONES/QUALIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS TIME LINE
E, QUALIFICATION PROGRAM ELEMENTS
F, SAFETY RELATED BOP EQUIPMENT
QUALIFICATION METHODS
G, QUALIFICATION PROCESS
H, EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION SCHEDULE
I, BOP EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION SUMMARY-
DES IGN CRITERIA
A, OVERVIEW OF DESIGN CRITERIA
1, DEFINITIONS
2, SAFETY RELATED OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
3, QUALIFIED LIFE
4, INFORMATION REQUIRED
5, DOCUMENTATION
6, IEEE 323
7, IEEE 627
8, STANDARDIZED APPEND ICES
ENCLOSURE i
0
e
EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW BOARD AGENDA (CONTINUED)
B,
C,
ENV I RONNENTAL QUALIFICATION CRITERIA
1, STANDARD REVIEW PLAN 3 11
2, GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1, 2, 4, 23
3, IEEE STDS, 279, 308, 317, 323, 334, 379,
382, 383, 387, 535, 627, 650
REG, GUIDES 1,32, 1,40, 1,53, 1,63, 1,73,
1,89, 1,131
5, NUREG 0588
6, CONNISSION ORDER CLI 80-21
7, IE BULLETIN 79-01B
8, 10CFR50 APPENDIX B
9, PVNGS ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATIONS
SE I SNI C QUALIFICATION CRITERIA
1, PVNGS SEISNIC CLASSIFICATIONS
2, STANDARD REVIEW PLANS 3,9,2, 3,9,3, 3,10
3, GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1, 2, 4, 14, 15
4, IEEE STANDARD 344
5, REG, GUIDES 1,20, 1,48, 1,60, 1,61, 1,67,
1,68, 1,92, 1,100, 1,124, 1,130
IV, EQU IPNENT QUALIFICATION PROCESS
A, PURPOSE
B, SPECIFICATION INSPECTION PLAN/HOLD/WITNESS
C, SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION PLANS/PROCEDURES
D, QUALIFICATION TEAN REVIEW
ENCLOSURE ii
(
I
IV,
V,
VI,
~S')~A BOP ESFAS
B, BOP INSTRUMENTATION
C; DIESEL GENERATOR
D, BATTERY CHARGER
EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REVIEl< BOARD AGENDA (CONTINUED)I
EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION PROCESS (CONTINUED)
E, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST
F, SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST
6, SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION TESTING/ANALYSIS
H, AUDIT OF TESTING
DOCUMENTATION
EXAMPLE QUALIFICATIONS
V
A, BOP ESFAS
B, BOP INSTRUMENTATION
C, DIESEL GENERATOR
D, BATTERY CHARGER
E, CABLES
QUALIFICATION PROBLEM AREAS
A, ENVIRONMENTAL
B, SEISMIC
ENCLOSURE iii
e
STANDARDNSSS
~ STANDARDLIC EN SIN G
APPROVAL
~ BOP
INTERFACEREQUIREMENTS
UTILITYAPPLICANT
SPECIFICREQUIREMENTS
DESIGNCRITERIA Q~~>
('TILITYAPPLICANTLIC EN SIN G
DOCUMENTS
DEVELOPMENTOF
STANDARD0 ESI GN
ENGINEER'S
BALANCE OF PLANTINFORMATION
~ SCHEDULE
~ BOPINTERFACE
~ LICENSING
~ BASIC CRITERIA
~ PEI 0'S
~ SINGLE LINES
PLANT ARRANGEMENT
MODULARCONCEPT
DESIGN
MODEL
~ DETAILEDCONSTRUCTIONDRAWINGS
~ PLANNINGPHOTOGRAPHS
~ PROCUREMENTSPECIFICATIONS
~ SYSTEM
DESCRIPTIONS
~ ENGINEERINGSCHEDULE
~ CONSTR U CTI0 N
SPECIFICATIONS
~ TEST
SPECIFICATIONS
~ STATIONMANUAL
PVNGS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
FIGURE 2
SUPPLIER SPECIFICATIONS
QUALPLANS,PROCEDURES,REPORTS
„,::,.':;P APS/BPC Y;.-:.":„:";:„
: .-'"".;.""-'„.SEISMIC/j„:-::".",j.".
')ENVIRONMENTAL)'UALIFICATIONi
DESIGNCRITERIA
INDEPENDENTQUALIF I CATIONPROGRAMS(RECALCITRANTSUPPLIER)
PVNGSSITERECORDS
QUALCRITERIA
FSAR
QUALSUMMARY
IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN CRITERIAFOB EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION
FIGURE 3
0
PVNGS
CE BECHTEL
INSTRUMENTATIONAND CONTROLEQUIPMENT
NSSS EQUIP(NON ICE)
INSTRUMENTATIONANO CONTROL,ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT
NON.ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT
PLANTPROTECTIVESYSTEM
LPSI
PUMP BOP ESFASDIESELGENERATOR
IN.CONTAINMENTSENSORS ANOTRANSMITTERS
SUPPLEMENTARYPROTECTIONSYSTEM
HPSI
PUMP
VALVES
BATTERYCHARGER
BOP INSTRUMENTATION
AUXILIARYFEEOWATERSYSTEM
ESSENTIALSPRAYPONDPUMPS
CETOPI GALS~ CENPO 255~ CENPD 182
CESSAR-F PVNGS FSAR
SCOPE OF PYNGS QUALIFICATION
FIGURE 4
i
8'
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
PSAR
CONSTRUCTIONPERMIT
I
I
INUREG 0588 L
FSAR
DOCKET
APPLICABLEGUALSTANDARDSIE EE 323-1 974IEEE 344-1975R.G. 1.89
IE BULL79-01B X
IEEE 627 4
Cu 80-21 X
MAJOR CE PURCHASE ORDERS
LPSI
HPSIPZR SOLENOID
MS VALVES VALVES
MOV
CENTCHARG f PUMPS
MAJOR BDP PURCHASE ORDERS
PROJECT MILESTONESfauauFICaTION REQUIRE¹NTSTIME LINE
FIGURE 5
BOP QUALIFICATIONPROGRAM
QUALIFICATIONOF 1ECOMPONENTS
QUALIF ICATIONOF OTHERSAFETY-RELATEDCOMPONENTS
SERVICE CONDITIONS SERVICE CONDITIONS
SEISMIC
~ SSE
ENVIRONMENTAL
~ TEMPERATURE
~ PRESSURE
~ RADI ATION
~ CHEMICAL
SEISMIC ENVIRONMENTAL
~ SSE +TEMPERATURE
~ PRESSURE
~ RADIATION
~ CHEMICAL
MAJORQUALIFICATIONCRITERIA
MAJORQUALIFICATIONCRITERIA
NUREG 0588 IEEE 627-1980
I EEE 323-1 974 IEEE 344-1975
IEEE 344-1975
QUALIFICATIONPBOGBAM ELEMENTS
FIGURE 6
"fABLE 1
BOP EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHODS
SAFETY-RELATEDEQUIPMENT CATEGORY
QUALIFICATIONMETHODS
A IN CONTAINMENTEQUIPMENT
1",2,3,4, OR 5
EXAMPLES
~ WIRE AND CABLE
~ VALVES
B OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT—POSSIBLE HARSHENVIRONMENT
C OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT-NON HARSHENVIRONMENT
1",2,3,4,0R 5
EXAMPLES
~ MCC'S
~ VALVES
1",2,3,4,085EXAMPLES
'DIESEL GENERATOR
~ CONTROL PANELS
D OUTSIDE CONTAINMENTNO AGE SENSITIVECOMPONENTS,PHYSICAL INTEGRITYREQUIRED
"TYPE TESTING IS PREFERRED METHOD
2,3,4,0R 5
EXAMPLES
~ Q COOLING COILS
~ CONTROL ROOM CEILING
METHOD 1 - TYPE TESTING
METHOD 2 - DOCUMENTED ANALYSIS
'ETHOD 3- DOCUMENTED OPERATING EXPERIENCE
METHOD 4-ONGOING QUALIFICATIONPROGRAM
METHOD 5 - COMBINATIONDF METHODS
0
APS/BECHTEL EQUIPMENTSUPPLIER
DESIGN ~
CRITERIA
SPECIFICATIONS
INSPECTION/NOLO/WITNESS PLAN
. SUPPLIERDESIGN ANDMANUFACTURING
QUALIFI CATIONTEAMREVIEW
QUA LIFICATIONPLANS/PROCEDURES
QUA LIF I CATIONAUDIT OFTESTING
TESTING ANALYSIS
QUAL IF I CATIONTEAMREVIEW
SUPPLIERQUALIFICATIONREPORT
FSAR DATASUMMARY
PVNGS SITERECORDS
QUAL IF I CATIONDOCUMENTATION
QUIPMEMT QUAllFICATIONPROCESS
0
J F M
1980
A M J J A S 0 N D J M A
1981
A S 0 N
1982
J A S 0 N D
MAY77
SUBMITCENPD
182
RECEIVE REVIEW
QUESTIONS ION CENPD 255
AND CENPD 1&2PREP
PAC
DATATOPVNGS
ARE DOCUMENTATION SITE
AGES l A
DATATOPVNGS
SITEA
NRCOOCKETSCESSAR
l4
INITIALEQUIPMENTQUAL IF I CATIONSUMMARYSUBMITTALTO NRC
FINAL EQUIPMENT
QUALIFICATION SUMMARYSUBMITTALTO NRC
NRC STARTSREVIEW OF
FSARNRC DOCKETSFSAR
NRC/ANPP REVIEW MEETINGS
I I .IREVIEW ALLQUAL'S, PLANS/RPTS
SUBMITTED TO DATE ANOESTABLISH ACTION PLAN
IPREPARE DOCUMENTATIONFOR FINALSUBMITTALHOLD QUALIFICATION
REVIEW MEETINGSWITH ALL44 PO
VENDORS
PREPARE DOCUMENTATION
FOR 1ST SUBMITTALPACKAGES
DATATOPVNGSSITE
I
INITIALEQUIPMENTQUALIFICATIONAMENDMENTTO NRC
NRC REVIEW ANO QUESTIONS
DATATOPVNGS
NRC
ISSUES
SERUNIT 1
FUEL LOADDATE
SER
SUPPLEMENTI I I
FINALEQUIPMENTQUALIFICATIONAMENDMENTTO NRC
mm+EQUIP QUALREVIEW BOARD
W WI
PVNGS
SITERECORDS
EGUIPNlEItIT QUALIFICATIONSCHEDULE '.
FIGURE 8
PVNGSSITERE ORD
0!
ENG INEER I NG
S
ARCHITECTURAL
CONTROLS.
ELECTRICAL
CABLE
EQU IPMENT
'MECHANICAL
NUCLEAR
PLANT DESIGN
TOTAL
PURCHASE
ORDERS
REQUIRING
QUALIFI-
9
12
17
59
PURCHASE ORDERS
N/QUALIFICATIONS
COMPLETED PRIOR
0 088
15
PURCHASE ORDERS
W/QUALIFICATIONS
COMPLETE PER
0
.00
FIGURE 9
e
III,A, OVERYIEH OF DESIGN CRITERIA
1) DEFINITION
~ SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT
~ QUALIFICATION
e SERYICE CONDITIONS
2) S D OP A 0 R QUIR M NTS
~ GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1. 2. 4 AND 23 OF APPENDIX A, AND SECTION III AND XI OF
APPENDIX B TO 10CFR PART 50,
~ IEEE 323-1974 AND,DAUGHTER DOCUMENTS
~ IEEE 627-1980
~ NRC REGULATORY GUIDES
EXHIBIT IIIA-1
5) PURPOS OF S B ISH NG A QUA IF ED FE FOR SAFE R ED A IP E
~ PROVIDE A LIMIT TO PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION
~ ESTABLISH AN ASSUMED END OF LIFE CONDITION BEFORE EAUIPMENT IS SUBJECTED TO
DESIGN BASIS EVENT CONDITIONS, INCLUDING SEISMIC,
4) I FO TO R QU R FO C SAFETY R A ED EAUIP EN I E
IDENTIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT AND ITS SAFETY RELATED FUNCTION
~ DETERMINATION OF OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS.
RANGE OF SERVICE CONDITIONS DURING NORMAL, ABNORMAL, DESIGN BASIS EVENT, POST
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT AND IN SERVICE TEST CONDITIONS
~ IDENTIFICATION OF COMPONENTS AND/OR MODULES OF THE EQUIPMENT HHICH ARE SUBJECT
TO AGING DETERIORATION
EXHIBIT IIIA-2
l
5) OCUME T T ON FO QUA FICATIO ME HODS SED
~ MUST BE IN AUDITABLE FORM
~ MUST BE AVAILABLEAND MAINTAINED BY LICENSEE AND/OR SUPPLIER FOR LIFE OF Pl ANT,
6) APP C TION OF I EE-323- 97 PRINCIPLES AND CRI E I
~ ELECTRICAL SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT
o OTHER SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT
7) PP 0 OF I 62 — 980 PRI CIP ES ND CRI ER
e NON-ELECTRICAL SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT
EXHIBIT I I IA-5
0
l
8) S AN ARDIZED SEISMIC ND ENVIRONMENTAL QUA IFIC TION SP CIFICATION PP DI S
~ APPENDIX 4E SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC
CATEGORY I ACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
~ APPENDIX 4F SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC
CATEGORY I NONACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
~ APPENDIX 4G GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF SEISMIC
CATEGORY II ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
~ APPENDIX 4H TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE
EQUIPMENT
~ APPENDIX 4I SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR
CATEGORY I ACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
EXHIBIT IIIA-4
i'
~ APPENDIX 4J SEISMIC QUALIFICATION FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I NONACTIVE
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
~ APPENDIX 4K TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE
EQUIPMENT — (PSAR)
~ APPENDIX 4T SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL AND
INSTRUMENTATION DEVICES
e APPENDIX 4U SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL PANEL
ASSEMBLIES
e APPENDIX 4V QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT,
DEVICES, AND INSTRUMENTATION
~ APPENDIX 4Y ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY-RELATED
CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEVICESb
EXHIBIT IIIA-5
ENVIRONMENTALQUAL IF ICATIONPROGRAM
QUALIFICATIONOF1E COMPONENTS
QUALIFICATIONOF OTHERSAFETY-BELATED COMPONENTS
NUREG 0588 IEEE 627-1 980
IEEE 323-1974
IEEE 535-1979
IEEE 650-1979
~ IEEE 323-1974
IEEE 387-1977
GENERALDESIGN CRITERIA
IEEE STANDARDSREGULATORYGUIDES
GDC 1-QUALITY
GDC2 —NAT PHEONOMENA
GDC 4 —ENVIRONMENTAL
GDC 23 —PROTECTION
IEEE 279-1971
IEEE 308-1974
IEEE 317-197F
IEEE 323-1974
RG 1.32, REV 0
BG 1.40, REV 0
RG 1.53, REV 0
RG 1.63, REV2
IEEE 334-1971 RG 1.73, REV 0
IEEE 379-1972 RG 1.89, REV 0
IEEE 382-1972 RG 1.131, REV 0
IEEE 383-1974
ENVIRONMENTALQUALIFICATIONCRITERIA
FIGURE 11
e',
I I I,B,1- STANDARD REVIEW PLAN 3,11, REV, 1
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Q IRMET
1, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
(1) EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DESIGNED TO HAVE THE CAPA-
BILITY OF PERFORMING DESIGN SAFETY FUNCTIONS
UNDER ALL NORMAL, ABNORMAL AND ACCIDENT ENVIRON-
MENTS, (2) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CAPABILITY
SHALL BE DEMONSTRATl:D BY TESTING AND/OR ANALYSES'S
APPROPRIATE, (3) A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50 APPENDIX B
SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED TO PROVIDE
ASSURANCE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN
SATISFACTORILY ACCOMPLISHED, THE ENVIRONMENTAL
DESIGN OF SAFETY-RELATED MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
EQUIPMENT IS ACCEPTABLE WHEN IT CAN BE ASCERTAINED
THAT ALL THREE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET,
EXHIBIT IIIB-1
PVNGS POS
IN AGREEMENT WITH GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT
0
SRP 3,11
REQ IR M T
2, APPLICABILITY OF IEEE 323-1974
IEEE STANDARD 323, ALTHOUGH SPECIFICALLY WRITTEN
FOR CLASS IE ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT, CONTAINS A CLEAR
PRESENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA THAT
ARE GENERIC TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
PROCESS ITSELF; THEREFORE, IEEE STANDARD 323 IS
CONSIDERED APPLICABLE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI-
FICATION OF OTHER TYPES OF EQUIPMENT, THE
ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN AND QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY-"
RELATED EQUIPMENT IS ACCEPTABLE WHEN IT IS ASCER-""
TAINED THAT THE CRITERIA OF IEEE STANDARD 323
HAVE BEEN MET,
PVNG POS
IN AGREEMENT WITH THE
APPLICATION OF
IEEE 323-1974
PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA TO
THE QUALIFICATION OF ALL
SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-2
0'
SRP 3,11
R QUIR M NT PVNG POS I
THE FOLLOWING IEEE STANDARDS SHOULD BE USED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH IEEE 323-1974 FOR QUALIFICATION
OF SPECIFIC ITEMS AS APPROPRIATE:
~ IEEE 317 ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS (AS MODIFIED
BY RG 1,63)
IN AGREEMENT WITIl THE USE
OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL
STANDARDS IN CONJUNCTION
WITH IEEE 323-1974 FOR
QUALIFICATION OF SPECIFIC
ITEMS AS APPROPRIATE,
IEEE 334, ELECTRIC MOTORS (AS MODIFIED BY
RG 1,40)
IEEE 382, VALVE OPERATORS (AS MODIFIED BY
RG 1,73)
IEEE 383, WIRE AND CABLE (AS MODIFIED BY
RG 1,131)
EXHIBIT IIIB-3
SRP 3,11
R QUIR MENT PVNG POSI ION
4, CHEMICAL QUALIFICATION
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT IS
ACCEPTABLE IF IT REFLECTS THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
OF ALL FLUIDS AND ADDITIVES PRESENT IN THE PRIMARY
SYSTEM OR ADDED TO THE CONTAINMENT ENVIRONMENT IN
THE COURSE OF THE ACCIDENT FOR VARIOUS MODES OF
EQUIPMENT OPERATION,
IN AGREEMENT WITfl THE
CHEMICAL QUALIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS,
5, RADIATION QUALIFICATION
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE RADIATION ENVIRONMENT IS
ACCEPTABLE IF IT REFLECTS SOURCE TERMS COMPARABLE
TO THOSE POSTULATED IN REGULATORY GUIDE 1,89,
IN AGREEMENT WITH TIIE
RADIATION QUALIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-4
e
0
III,B,2 10CFR50 APP A,
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA
PVNGS POSI ON
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION 01, QUALITY
STANDARDS AND RECORDS
~ QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS OF
APP, B TO 10CFR50 ARE MET,
STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS
IMPORTANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED,
AND TESTED TO QUALITY STANDARDS COMMENSU-
RATE WITH THE SAFETY FUNCTION TO BE
PERFORMED, APPROPRIATE RECORDS OF TESTING
SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE LIFE
OF THE UNIT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-5
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹2, DESIGN BASES
FOR PROTECTION AGAINST NATURAL PHENOMENA
PVNGS POSI ON
STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IMPOR- ~ STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO
TANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED TO SAFETY ARE PROTECTED FROM THE EFFECTS
WITHSTAND THE EFFECTS OF NATURAL PHENOMENA OF ADVERSE METEOROLOGICAL PHENOMENA, AS
WITHOUT LOSS OF CAPABILITY TO PERFORM DESCRIBED IN FSAR SECTIONS 3,3 AND 3,0,
THEIR SAFETY FUNCTIONS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-6
GENERAl DESIGN CRITERION P4,
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MISSILE DESIGN BASES
GS
IN AGREEMENT, IN ADDITIOtl, THE FOLLOWING
DESIGN FEATURES ARE PROVIDED:
STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS
IMPORTANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
ACCOMMODATE THE EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NORMAL OPERA-
TION, MAINTENANCE, TESTING AND POSTULATED
ACCIDENTS INCLUDING LOSS OF COOLANT
ACCIDENTS,
~ SYSTEMS AND COf"lPONENTS OUTSIDE
CONTAINMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY ARE
PROVIDED WITH REDUNDANCY,
~ PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE HAS BEEN
PROVIDED FOR REDUNDANT EQUIPMENT TO
PRECLUDE FAILURES If'3 ONE TRAIN FROM
ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE REDUNDANT
TRAIN,
EXHIBIT I I IB-7
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION 825,
PROTECTION SYSTEM FAILURE MODES
THE PROTECTION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED
TO FAIL INTO A SAFE STATE —IF CONDITIONS
SUCH AS DISCONNECTION OF THE SYSTEM, OR
POSTULATED ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTS ARE
EXPERIENCED,
~ A SINGLE FAILURE OF ANY PROTECTIVE
CHANNEL HILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT
THE SAFETY OF THE PLANT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-8
III,B;5 IEEE 279-1971
CRITERIA FOR PROTECTION SYSTEMS
FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
UIREMENT PV GS POSI IO
1) TYPE TEST DATA OR EXTRAPOLATION BASED ON
TEST DATA SHALL BE AVAILABLETO VERIFY THAT
PROTECTION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT SHALL MEET
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACHIEVING THE
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS,
THE REQUIRED DATA WILL BE
AVAILABLE,
2) THE RANGE OF TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS
OF BOTH THE ENERGY SUPPLY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (FOR
EXAMPLE, VOLTAGE, FREQUENCY, TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY,
PRESSURE, VIBRATION, ETC) DURING NORMAL, ABNORMAL,
AND ACCIDENT CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL BE DOCUMENTED,
OPERATING PARAMETERS ARE
DOCUMENTED IN THE EQUIP-
MENT SPECIFICATIONS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-9
u'
I EEE 279-1971
REQ IR MEN PVNGS P SITIO
5) MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE
DOCUMENTED, THESE INCLUDE SYSTEM RESPONSE
TIMES, SYSTEM ACCURACIES, AND RANGES (NORMAL,
ABNORMAL, AND ACCIDENT CONDITIONS) OF THE
MAGNITUDES AND RATES OF CHANGE OF SENSED
VARIABLES TO BE ACCOMMODATED UNTIL PROPER
CONCLUSION OF THE PROTECTIVE ACTION IS
ASSURED,
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
ARE DOCUMENTED IN THE
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-10
IEEE 308-1974
IEEE .STANDARD CRITERIA FOR
CLASS IE POWER SYSTEMS FOR
NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
R QUIREM N VNG OS
THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF SYSTEMS PROVIDE ELECTRIC POWER TO
CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT:
1) ALTERNATING CURRENT POWER SYSTEMS
2) DIRECT CURRENT POWER SYSTEMS
3) VITAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL POWER
SYSTEMS'ACH
TYPE OF CLASS 1E POWER EQUIPMENT SHALL BE QUALIFIED BY
ANALYSIS, SUCCESSFUL USE UNDER SIMILAR CONDITIONS, OR BY
ACTUAL TEST TO DEMONSTRATE ITS ABILITY TO PERFORM ITS
FUNCTION UNDER NORMAL AND DESIGN BASIS EVENTS,
EQUIPMENT COVERED BY
SPECIFICATIONS EM-051,
JM-104, JM-105, JM-108,
JM-ill, JM-200, JM-359,
JM-391, MM-018 AND MM-234A
ARE BEING QUALIFIED USING
IEEE 308 IN CONJUNCTION
WITH IEEE 323, EACH
REQUIRES FULL COMPLIANCE
WITH THESE IEEE STANDARDS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-11
IEEE 517-1976
IEEE STANDARD FOR ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSENBLIES
IN CONTAINNENT STRUCTURES FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
FINITIO
ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSENBLY — AN ASSENBLY OF INSULATED
ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS, CONDUCTOR SEALS, AND APERTURE SEALS
THAT PROVIDES THE PASSAGE OF ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS THROUGH
A SINGLE APERTURE IN THE CONTAINNENT STRUCTURE blHILE
PROVIDING A PRESSURE BARRIER BETWEEN THE INSIDE AND
OUTSIDE OF THE CONTAINNENT STRUCTURE,
EXHIBIT IIIB-12
i
I EEE 317-1976
REQUIREME T PVNGS POSI IO
1) DESIGN QUALIFICATION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY MATERIAL
TESTS AND TYPE TESTS PERFORMED ON REPRESENTATIVE
ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES, EXISTING
QUALIFICATION TEST DATA MAY BE USED WHEN IT CAN
BE SHOWN BY DOCUMENTED ANALYSIS OR ADDITIONAL
TESTING OF COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES OR BOTH THAT
THE EXISTING TEST DATA ARE VALID FOR THE PENETRATION
BEING QUALIFIED,
o SPECIFICATION EMO35A
REQUIRES QUALIFICATION
OF PENETRATION UNDER ALL
POSTULATED SERVICE
CONDITIONS, TESTING IN
PROGRESS,
2) MARGINS SHALL BE APPLIED AS FOLLOWS:
~ CURRENT +5%
~ VOLTAGE +10%
~ TEMP +80C
~ SPECIFICATION REQUIRES
FULI COMPLIANCE WITH
IEEE 317, TESTING IN
PROGRESS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-13
'
I EEE 317-1976
R Q IR M PVNG POSI IO
e PRESSURE +10% OF GAUGE NOT TO EXCEED 10 PSI
~ VIBRATION +10%
~ RADIATION +10% AN ACCIDENT DOSE
3) CONDUCTORS TO MEET IEEE 383 FLAME TESTS IN AGREEMENT MITH REQUIRE-
MENTS OF IEEE 383 FLAME
TESTS,
EXHIBIT I I IB-14
I
IEEE 323-1974
IEEE STANDARD FOR QUALIFYING CLASS IE
EQUIPMENT FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
THE CAPABILITY OF CLASS IE EQUIPMENT FOR PERFORMING
ITS REQUIRED FUNCTION SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED,
A, PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES FOR DEMONSTRATING THE ~ CLASS IE EQUIPMENT HILL
QUALIFICATION OF'CLASS IE EQUIPMENT INCLUDE: BE QUALIFIED,
(1) ASSURANCE THAT THE SEVERITY OF THE
QUALIFICATION METHODS EQUAL OR EXCEED .
THE MAXIMUM ANTICIPATED SERVICE
REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
(2) ASSURANCE THAT ANY EXTRAPOLATION OR
INFERENCE BE JUSTIFIED BY ALLOWANCES FOR
KNOWN POTENTIAL FAILURE MODES AND THE
MECHANISM LEADING TO THEM
EXHIBIT IIIB-15
I EEE 323-1974
PVNGS OS IO
(3) ON-GOING QUALIFICATION TESTING OF INSTALLED
EQUIPMENT WHOSE QUALIFIED LIFE IS LESS THAN
THE DESIGN LIFE OF THE EQUIPMENT
ON-GOING QUALIFICATION
PROGRAMS ARE DISCOURAGED
(4) DOCUMENTATION FILES WHICH PROVIDE THE BASIS
FOR QUALIFICATION
DOCUMENTATION WILL BE
PROVIDED,
(5) QUALIFICATION TEST DATA AS REQUIRED FOR
ON-GOING QUALIFICATION TESTING
(6) QUALIFICATION OF ANY INTERFACES ASSOCIATED
WITH CLASS IE EQUIPMENT
EXHIBIT IIIB-16
I EEE 525-1974
B, SEVERAL DEMONSTRATION METHODS ARE ACCEPTABLE,
SERVICE CONDITIONS, SIZE, AND AGING ARE
FACTORS WHICH DETERMINE THE DEMONSTRATION
METHOD TO BE USED TO ASSURE PROPER
QUALIFICATION,
~ METHODS OF QUALIFICATION
PER TABLE 1
C, IDENTIFICATION OF CI ASS IE EQUIPMENT ~ CLASS IE EQUIPMENT IS
IDENTIFIED BY SYSTEM
AND ITEM
EXHIBIT IIIB-17
I EEE 323-1974
PVNGS POS IO
D, METHODS OF QUALIFICATION
~ TYPE TESTING OF ACTUAL EQUIPMENT USING
SIMULATED SERVICE CONDITIONS IS THE
PREFERRED METHOD, TESTING SHALL
DEMONSTRATE THAT EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE
MEETS OR EXCEEDS SPECIFICATION REQUIRE-
MENTS, USING A PLANNED SEQUENCE OF TEST
CONDITIONS THAT MEET OR EXCEED THE
EXPECTED OR SPECIFIED SERVICE CONDITIONS,
INCLUDING MARGIN, UNDER NORMAL AND
ABNORMAL OPERATION,
~ TYPE TESTING IS PRE-
FERRED FOR 1E ITEMS IN
CONTAINMENT AND OTHER
HARSH ENVIRONMENT AREAS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-18
0
0
I EEE 323-1974
PVNGS POS ION
~ OPERATING EXPERIENCE, EQUIPMENT THAT HAS
OPERATED SUCCESSFULLY CAN BE CONSIDERED
QUALIFIED FOR EQUAL OR LESS SEVERE SERVICE,
THE VAI IDITY OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE SHAI L
BE DETERMINED FROM THE TYPE AND AMOUNT OF
DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING THE SERVICE .
CONDITIONS AND EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE,
~ USE OF OPERATING
EXPERIENCE ALONE IS
DISCOURAGED, CAN BE
USED IN CONJUNCTION
NITH OTHER METHODS WHEN
PROPERLY DOCUMENTED,
EXHIBIT IIIB-19
I EEE 323-1974
V G POS I
~ ANALYSIS, QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS REQUIRES
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A VALID MATHEMATICALMODEL
OF THE ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT TO BE QUALIFIED,
THE VALIDITYOF THE MODEL SHALL BE JUSTIFIED
BY TEST DATA, OPERATING EXPERIENCE, OR PHYSICAL
LAWS OF NATURE ~
~ QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS
MUST BE SUPPORTED BY SOME
TYPE TESTING, OR DOCU-
MENTED OPERATING
EXPERIENCE,
DATA USED SHALL BE PERTINENT TO THE APPLICATION
AND IN AN AUDITABLE FORM,
EXHIBIT IIIB-20
,
I EEE 323-1974
PVNGS P
~ ONGOING QUALIFICATION USED IN THE EVENT
EQUIPMENT HAS QUALIFIED LIFE LESS THAN
ANTICIPATED INSTALLED LIFE,
(1) AGING AND TESTING OF IDENTICAL
EQUIPMENT OR COMPONENTS MAY CONTINUE
DURING THE QUALIFIED LIFE PERIOD
OF THE INSTALLED EQUIPMENT,
~ AN ONGOING QUALIFICATION
PROGRAM USING IDENTICAL
EQUIPMENT HAVING AN
IDENTIFIED QUALIFIED
LIFE IS ACCEPTABLE,
(2) ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT COULD BE
INSTALLED BESIDE THE REQUIRED
EQUIPMENT, REMOVED BEFORE THE END
.OF THE QUALIFIED LIFE PERIOD, AND
BE TYPE TESTED TO DETERMINE ITS
ADDITIONAL QUALIFIED LIFE,
EXHIBIT IIIB-21
'
I EEE 323-1974
VN S POS 0
3) OTHER METHODS WITH PROPER JUSTIFICATION
MAY BE FOUND EQUIVALENT,
~ COMBINED QUALIFICATION, EQUIPMENT MAY
BE QUALIFIED BY TYPE TEST, PREVIOUS
OPERATING EXPERIENCE, ANALYSIS, OR ANY
COMBINATION OF THESE METHODS,
~ COMBINATION QUALIFICA-
TION PROGRAMS ARE
ACCEPTABLE,
EXHIBIT IIIB-22
I EEE 323-1970
PVNGS POS T 0
~ DOCUMENTATION, .DOCUMENTATION SHALL
YERIFY THAT EACH TYPE OF ELECTRIC
EQUIPMENT IS QUALIFIED FOR ITS
APPLICATION AND MEETS ITS SPECIFIED
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS, THE BASIS
OF QUALIFICATION SHALL BE EXPLAINED TO
SHOW THE ADEQUACY OF THE COMPLETE
EQUIPMENT, DATA SHALL BE ORGANIZED IN
AN AUDITABLE FORM,
IN AGREEMENT WITH DOCUMENTA-
TION REQUIREMENTS. PROPRIETARY
DATA MAY REQUIRE AUDIT IN
SUPPLIER'S FACILITY,
EXHIBIT IIIB-23
4
0
IEEE 323-1974
PVNGS POS I
~ AGING, THE OBJECTIVE OF AGING IS TO
ACHIEVE END-OF-LIFE CONDITION, PREVIOUS
AGING CAN BE UTILIZED PROVIDED DATA ARE
APPLI CABLE AND JUSTIFIABLE, ACCELERATED
THERMAL AGING PRODUCES SOME DETERIORATION
AND, WHEN FOLLOWED BY VIBRATION, MAY
PRODUCE REALISTIC FAILURE MODES, RADIATION
SHALL BE ADDED WHERE APPROPRIATE, MARGINS
SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE APPLICATION OF EACH
INFLUENCE, ELECTROMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE OPERATED TO SIMULATE EXPECTED
MECHANICAL WEAR AND ELECTRICAL CONTACT
DEGRADATION, AN ACCELERATED RATE FOR THE
NUMBER OF CYCLES EQUAL TO THE REQUIRED
NUMBER DURING THE DESIGN LIFE MAY BE
UTILIZED,
~ AGING MUST BE CONSIDERED
REGARDLESS OF THE QUALI-
FICATION METHOD USED,
EXHIBIT IIIB-24
I EEE 523-1974
PVN S POS TIO
FOR INSULATING MATERIALS, A REGRESSION
LINE (SEE IEEE STD 101-1972, GUIDE FOR
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THERMAL LIFE
TEST DATA) MAY BE USED AS A BASIS FOR
SELECTING THE AGING TIME AND TEMPERATURE,
SAMPLE AGING TIMES OF LESS THAN 100 HOURS
SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED,
~ ARRHENIUS METHODOLOGY IS
CONSIDERED AN ACCEPTABLE
METHOD OF ADDRESSING
ACCELERATED AGING,
OTHER METHODS ARE
POSSIBLE,
IN AGREEMENT WITH AGING
REQUIREMENTS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-25
I EEE 323-1970
PVNGS PO I IO
o TEST SEQUENCE, TYPE TESTS SHALL BE
RUN ON THE EQUIPMENT IN A SPECIFIED
ORDER, THE SEQUENCE USED SHALL BE
JUSTIFIED AS THE MOST SEVERE FOR THE
ITEM BEING TESTED,
~ TYPE TESTING SHOULD BE
DONE IN SEQUENCE ON THE
SAME ITEM EXCEPT IF
IMPRACTICAL,
(1) INSPECTION, THIS INSPECTION SHALL
NOT BE DIRECTED TO SELECT A SPECI-
FIC UNIT FOR TYPE TESTING,
IN AGRFEMENT.
EXHIBIT IIIB-26
,
IEEE 323-1974
PVNGS POS IO
(2) OPERATION UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS
TO PROVIDE A DATA BASE FOR COMPARISON
WITH PERFORMANCE UNDER MORE HIGHLY
STRESSED CONDITIONS,
IN AGREEMENT,
(3) OPERATION TO THE EXTREMES OF ALL
PERFORMANCE AND ELECTRICAL CHARACTER-
ISTICS EXCLUDING DESIGN BASIS EVENT
AND POST DESIGN BASIS EVENT CONDITIONS
DATA FROM OTHER TESTS ON IDENTICAL OR
ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR EQU I PMENT ARE
ACCEPTABLE,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-27
'
IEEE 323-1974
PVNGS POSI IO
(4) EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AGED TO PUT IT IN A
CONDITION WHICH SIMULATES ITS.EXPECTED
END-OF-QUALI F IED-LIFE CONDITION INCLU-
DING THE EFFECT OF RADIATION (DESIGN
BASIS EVENT RADIATION MAY BE INCLUDED),
IF THE REQUIRED RADIATION LEVEL CAN BE
SHOWN TO PRODUCE LESS EFFECT THAN THAT
WHICH WOULD CAUSE LOSS OF THE EQUIPMENT'S
CLASS IE FUNCTION, RADIATION NEED NOT BE
INCLUDED AS PART OF AGING, CERTAIN KEY
MEASUREMENTS SHOULD BE MADE FOLLOWING
AGING TO DETERMINE IF THE EQUIPMENT IS
PERFORMING SATISFACTORILY PRIOR TO
SUBSEQUENT TESTING,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-28
I EEE 323-1974
PV G POS
(5) AGED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO
MECHANICAL VIBRATION AS WILL BE SEEN
IN SERVICE, THIS SHOULD INCLUDE S IMU-
LATED SEISMIC VIBRATION, SELF-INDUCED
VIBRATION, OR VIBRATION FROM OTHER
CAUSES (SUCH AS MIGHT BE SEEN BY
PIPE-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT),
IN AGREEtIENT,
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
QUALIFICATION BEING
REVIEWED FOR
COMPLIANCE,
(6) OPERATE AGED EQUIPMENT WHILE EXPOSED TO
THE SIMULATED DESIGN BASIS EVENT
(RADI ATION MAY BE EXCLUDED IF INCORPO-
RATED IN (4) ABOVE), FUNCTIONS WHICH MUST
BE PERFORMED DURING THE SIMULATED DESIGN
BASIS EVENT SHALL BE MONITORED,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
QUALIFICATION BEING
REVIEWED FOR
COMPLIANCE,
EXHIBIT IIIB-29
'
IEEE 323-1974
PVNGS 0 10
(7) OPERATE EQUIPMENT WHILE EXPOSED TO
THE SIMUI ATED POST ACCIDENT CONDITIONS
(FOLLOWING EXPOSURE TO ACCIDENT
CONDITIONS), FUNCTIONS WHICH MUST
BE PERFORMED FOLLOWING THE SIMULATED
DESIGN BASIS EVENT SHALL BE MONITORED,
IN AGREEMENT, .
(8) DISASSEMBLE, TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY
FOR INSPECTION OF THE STATUS AND
CONDITION OF THE EQUIPMENT AND RECORD
THE FINDINGS,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-30
I EEE 323-1974
VNGS POS I IO
~ MARGIN IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
MOST SEVERE SPECIFIED SERVICE CONDI-
TIONS OF THE PLANT AND THE CONDITIONS
USED IN TYPE TESTING TO ACCOUNT FOR
NORMAL VARIATIONS IN COMMERCIAL
PRODUCTION OF EQUIPMENT AND REASONABLE
ERRORS IN DEFINING SATISFACTORY
PERFORMANCE, THE QUALIFICATION TYPE
TESTING SHALL INCLUDE ADEQUATE MARGIN,
~ MARGIN MUST BE INCLUDED
IN ALL TYPE TEST PRO-
GRAMS AND IN ANALYSIS
OF MATERIALS AND
COMPONENTS,
IN AGREEMENT WITH
MARGIN REQUIREMENTS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-31
'
I EEE 323-1974
PVNGS PO 0
SUGGESTED FACTORS TO BE APPLIED TO SERVICE
CONDITIONS FOR TYPE TESTING ARE AS FOLLOWS:
(1) TEMPERATURE: +15 F (8 C)
(2) PRESSURE: +10 PERCENT OF GAUGE,
BUT NOT MORE THAN 10 tap/IN
(3) RADIATION: +10 PERCENT (ON
ACCIDENT DOSE),
(4) VOLTAGE: +10 PERCENT OF RATED
VALUE,
EXHIBIT IIIB-32
I
I EEE 323-1974
PVNGS P SI IO
(5) FREQUENCY: +5 PERCENT OF RATED
VALUE,
(6) TIME: +10 PERCENT OF THE PERIOD
OF TIME THE.EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED
TO BE OPERATIONAL FOLLOWING THE
DESIGN BASIS EVENT,
(7) ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSIENTS: THE
INITIALTRANSIENT AND THE DWELL
AT PEAK TEMPERATURE SHALL BE
APPLIED AT LEAST TWICE,
LOCA AND MSLB PROFILES DO
NOT CONTAIN TWO PEAK
TRANSIENT PERIODS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-33
IEEE 525-1974-
(8) VIBRATION: +10 PERCENT ADDED TO
THE ACCELERATION OF THE RESPONSE
SPECTRUM AT THE MOUNTING POINT OF
THE EQUIPMENT,
NOTE: NEGATIVE FACTORS SHALL BE APPLIED WHEN LOWERING THE VALUE OF THE SERVICE CONDITIONS
INCREASES THE SEVERITY OF THE TEST,
EXHIBIT IIIB-54
IEEE 334-1974
IEEE STANDARD FOR TYPE TESTS OF CONTINUOUS DUTY CLASS IE
MOTORS FOR NUCLEAR POWER GEf'lERATING STATIONS
~ TEST PROCEDURES TO DEMONSTRATE
ADEQUACY FOR TllE REQUIRED CLASS 1E
FUNCTIONS REQUIRE KNOWLEDGE OF MOTOR
CONSTRUCTIOI'J AND THE PARTICULAR FEA-
TURES UPON WHICH EXPECTED PERFORMANCE
DEPENDS,
EQUIPMENT COVERED BY SPECIFICATION MM-093
IS BEING QUALIFIED USING IEEE-334 IN
CONJUNCT IOI'1 WITH IEEE-323,
THE SPECIFICATION REQUIRES -FULL COMPLI-
ANCE WITH THESE IEEE STANDARDS,
(NOTE: I'10 CONTINUOUS DUTY MOTORS INSIDE
CONTAItlMENT)
EXHIBIT IIIB-35
l
tI EEE 379-1972
IEEE TRIAL-USE GUIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION
TO NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATION PROTECTION SYSTEMS
THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION IS A BASIC
PRINCIPLE IN THE DESIGN OF RELIABLE SYSTEMS,
SINGLE FAILURES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE
SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION, REGARDLESS OF
WHETHER OR NOT THEY VIOLATE THE SINGLE-
FAILURE CRITERION, ARE CLASSIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
TYPE 1: A DETECTABLE FAILURE RESULTING
FROM ONE FAILED COMPONENT OR MODULE OR
FROM A CIRCUIT FAULT
THERE ARE OTHER APPROACHES TO HIGH SYS-
TEM RELIABILITY, NOT INCLUDED IN THIS
GUIDE, SUCH AS EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION,
PERIODIC TESTING, AND THE SETTING AND
ACHIEVEMENT OF RELIABILITYGOALS,
(QUALIF I CATION PRECLUDES CONSIDERATION
OF COMMON NODE)
EXHIBIT IIIB-36
1
l
I EEE 379-1972
TYPE 2: MULTIPLE DETECTABLE FAILURES
RESULTING FROM A SINGLE CAUSE EXTERNAL
TO THE PROTECTION SYSTEM
TYPE 3: 'MULTIPLE DETECTABLE FAILURES
RESULTING FROM A SINGLE CAUSE WITHIN THE
PROTECTION SYSTEM
THE MULTIPLE FAILURES OF TYPES 2 AND 3 ARE
EXAMPLES OF COMMON-MODE FAILURES, OTHER
COMMON-MODE FAILURES RESULTING FROM MANUFAC-
TURING AND MAINTENANCE.ERRORS, CERTAIN UNANTIC-
IPATED DESIGN SHORTCOMINGS, AND FACTORS NOT
CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN BASIS SHOULD BE
-CONSIDERED,
EXHIBIT IIIB-37
I
IEEE 382-1972
IEEE TRIAL-USE GUIDE FOR TYPE TEST OF CLASS I ELECTRIC VALVE
OPERATORS FOR flUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
~ GENERAL, THE TYPE TEST SHALL DEMONSTRATE
THAT THE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF
THE VALVE OPERATOR ADHERE TO THE EQUIP-
MENT SPECIFICATIONS, THE TEST FOR THE
SAMPLE VALVE OPERATOR SHAI L CONSIST OF
SUBJECTING IT TO THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE
OF COHDITIOf]S TO SIMULATE THE DESIGN
BASIS SERVICE CONDITIONS OF THE OPERATOR,
(1) AGING, (2) SEISMIC, AflD (3) ACCIDENT
OR OTfkER SPECIAL ENVIRONMENT 'AS APPLICABLE,
~ EQUIPMENT COVERED BY SPECIFICA-
TIONS JM-601A, JM-601B, JM-603,
JM-605, PM-221A, PM-221B AND PM-221C
ARE BEING QUALIFIED USING IEEE-382
IN CONJUNCTION 'krITH IEEE-393, EACH
REQUIRES FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THESE
IEEE STANDARDS,
NOTE: IEEE 382-1980 HAS BEEN
APPROVED, BUT IS NOT YET AVAILABLE
ON DISTRIBUTION,
EXHIBIT I I IB-38
I EEE 382-1972
Q
~ INSPECTION
UPON COMPLETION OF THE TESTS THE VALVE
OPERATOR SHALL BE DISMANTLED AND
VISUALLY INSPECTED, THE CONDITION OF
COMPONENTS SHALL BE RECORDED,
IN AGREENENT WITH THF. INSPECTION
REQUIREMENT,
~ DOCUMENTATION
THE TYPE TEST DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE
SUFFICIENT TO VERIFY THE EQUIPMENT
MEETS ITS SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
REQUIREMENTS,'
DOCUMENTATION PER IEEE 323-1974
REQUIRED,
EXHIBIT IIIB-39
1
i
IEEE 383-1974
IEEE STANDARD FOR TYPE TEST OF CLASS IE ELECTRIC CABLES, FIELD SPLICES,. AND CONNECTIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
o TYPE TESTS AS QUALIFICATION METHOD
TYPE TESTS ARE THE PREFERRED METHOD TO
DEMONSTRATE OR ASSIST IN DEMONSTRATING THAT
ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT IS CAPABLE OF MEETING
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SERVICE CONDITIONS
WHICH INCLUDE NORMAL AilD DESIGN BASIS EVENT
ENVIRONMENTS, TO PERFORM TYPE TESTS FOR- CABLE,
FIELD SPLICES, AND CONNECTIONS REQUIRES:
(1) IDENTIFICATION OF CABLE, (2) DESCRIPTION
OF SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT, AND
(3) DESCRIPTION OF CABLE PERFORMANCE REQUIRED
THESE, WITH ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE
IN INSULATING MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS FORM A BASIS
FOR DESIGNING TYPE TESTS TO DEMONSTRATE THE
G POS 0
EQUIPMENT COVERED BY SPECI-FICATIONSNS
EM-021, EM-022,
EM-035A, EM-051, EM-057,
EM-058, EM-060, EM-061,.
EM-062, EM-064, EM-064A,
EM-106A, EM-106B, EM-117,
JM-104, JM-105, JM-108,
JM-111, JM-200, JM-311,
JM-359 AND JM-391 ARE BEING
QUAI IFIED USING IEEE-383 IN
CONJUNCTION WITH IEEE-323
EACH REQUIRES FULL COMPLI-
ANCE WITH THESE IEEE
STANDARDS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-40
l
IEEE 387-1977
P S OS 0
CAPABILITIES, QUALIFICATION OF ONE CABLE
HAY PERNIT EXTRAPOLATION OF RESULTS TO QUALIFY
OTHER CABLES OF THE SANE TYPE,
FACTORY REPAIRS AND
l'1ANUFACTURING SPLICES ARE
REQUIRED TO BE TESTED,
FLANE TESTS PER SEC-
'ION 2,5, GAS BURNER
NETHOD ARE REQUIRED USING
AT LEAST 70,000 BTU
BURNER INPUT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-COA
I EEE 383-1974
A SAMPLE FIELD SPLICE OR CONNECTION OR BOTH MUST BE
TYPE TESTED WITH THE CABLE TO DEMONSTRATE ITS ELEC-
TRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITY IN THE
ENVIRONMENTS.
~ DOCUMENTATION
PROVIDE DATA NECESSARY TO DOCUMENT SATISFACTORY COM-
PLIANCE, CERTIFICATION OF PRIOR TEST RESULTS WILL BE
PROVIDED WHEN REQUIRED,
~ DOCUMENTATION PER
IEEE 323-1974
REQUIRED, PRIOR
TEST RESULTS
ACCEPTABLE IF THESE
ENVELOPE PVNGS
CONDITIONS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-41
IEEE 387-1977
IEEE STANDARD CRITERIA FOR DIESEL GENERATING UNITS APPLIED AS STANDBY PONER
SUPPLIES FOR NUCLEAR POl<ER GENERATING STATIONS
~ THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO THE APPLICATION OF DIESEL GEN-
ERATOR UNITS OR INDIVIDUALUNITS OF THE STANDBY POttER
SUPPLIES IN STATIONARY NUCLEAR PONER GENERATING STATIONS,
~ ITEMS INCLUDED — SEE FIG 387-1,
~ RATINGS
CONTINUOUS — 8760 HOURS PER YEAR
SHORT TIME - 2 HOURS IN ANY 24 HOURS WITHOUT EXCEEDING
MANUFACTURER RATINGS
EXHIBIT IIIB-42
I
CLASS IE A.C.DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
CTREMOTEPROTECTIVESYSTEM
O.C.POWERSUPPLY
NEMO'TE CONTROLa SURVEILLANCESYSTEM
EXHAUST'SINK
PT
GENERATORTERMINALS
CPS CPS
LUBE OILSYSTEM
LOCALCONTROL,PROTECTION B,
SURVEILLANCESYSTEM ICPS)
I
II
I
CPS
EXHAUSTSYSTEM
EXCITER GVOLTAGE REG.ULATOR SYSTEM
GENERATORFLY.WHEEL
DIESEL ENGINE GOVERROR
CPS
STARTINGENERGYSYSTEM
STARTINGSYSTEM
CPS
COMBUSTIONAIR SYSTEM
COOLINGWATERSYSTEM
I CPS
FUEL OILSYSTEM
LILIITOFSCOPE OFDIESEL ~
GENERATORUNIT
SERVICEENVIRONMENT
DIESEL ~ GENERATOR UNITFOUNDATION
DIESEL ~ GEN.ERATOR UNITENCLOSURE
COOLINGAIR
VENTILA.TINGSYSTEM
AIRSUPPLY
COOLINGWATERSUPPLYSYSTEM
FUEL OII.STORAGEBISUPPLY
LEGEND:ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS (CONTROL, AUXILIARYPOWER, ETC;MAINPOWERI
NON ELECTRICALCHANNELS (OIL, AIR, EXHAUST, ETC; DRIVE)
EINI'IOf SCOPE OF NIECES.CEIIEIIAtOANNltWIININtERFACE (+)CONTROL PROTECTION AND SURVEILLANCESYSTEMS
FIGURE 387-1
l
IEEE 387-1977
~ TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTING PROCEDURES AND METHODS
DIESEL-GENERATORS OF TYPES NOT PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED AS
A STANDBY POltER SOURCE FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING
STATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A TYPE QUALIFICATION
TESTING PROGRAM CONSISTING OF LOAD CAPABILITY QUALIFI-
CATION, START AND LOAD ACCEPTANCE QUALIFICATION, AND
MARGIN QUALIFICATION, QUALIFICATION TESTS MAY BE
PERFORMED ON ONE OR MORE UNITS, ALTHOUGH QUALIFICATION
OF ONE UNIT HILL QUALIFY LIKE UNITS OF THAT TYPE FOR
EQUAL OR LESS SEVERE SERVICE, IF START AND LOAD
ACCEPTANCE QUALIFICATION TESTS ARE PERFORMED USING
MORE THAN ONE IDENTICAL UNIT, THEN EACH OF THESE UNITS
MUST BE TESTED FOR LOAD CAPABILITY QUALIFICATION AND
MARGIN QUALIFICATION,
~ THE DIESEL-GENERATORS
COVERED BY SPECIFICA-
TION MM-018 ARE BEING
QUALIFIED USING
IEEE 387 IN CONJUNC-
TION WITH IFEE-323,
THE SPECIFICATION
REQUIRES FULL COM-
PLIANCE i'IITH TflESE
IEEE STANDARDS,
TESTS IN MANUFAC-
TURERS FACILITY
PREFERRED,
EXHIBIT I I IB-43
8
I
I EEE 387-1977
TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTS ON THE COMPLETE DIESEL-GENERATOR UNIT
SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ADDITION TO SEISMIC ANALYSIS OR SEISMIC
TESTING BY THE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
IEEE STD 344-1975,
TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED FOLLOWING SUCCESS-
FUL COMPLETION OF THE DIESEL BREAK-IN RUld, AND THE FACTORY
PRODUCTION TESTS,
FOLLOWING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTS
THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFAC-
TURER'S STANDARD PROCEDURE, AND INSPECTION RESULTS SHALL BE
DOCUMENTED,
~ DOCUMENTATION
TESTS SHALL BE COMPLETELY DOCUMENTED, INCLUDING RECORDS OF
FAILURES, THEIR REPAIR AND RETESTING,
'N AGREEMENT WITH THE
DOCUMENTATION
REQUIREMENTS,
NOTE: P387/D4 OF JULY 1, 1980 HAS BEEN PROPOSED, AMONG OTHER CHANGES, THIS DRAFT PLACES
ALL QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN ONE SECTION AND USES METHODS AND PRINCIPALS OF
I EEE 323-1974,EXHIBIT IIIB-44
'
IEEE 535-1979
IEEE STANDARD FOR QUALIFICATION OF CLASS 1E LEAD STORAGE BATTERIES
FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIOf'lS
~ QUALIFICATION REQUIRED IN ANSI/IEEE
STD 279-1971 AND IEEE STD 308-1978, CAN BE
DEMONSTRATED BY USING THE PROCEDURES PROVIDED
IN THIS STANDARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH IEEE
STD 323-1974,
~ BATTERIES COVERED BY
SPECIFICATION El"l-050 ARE
BEOG QUALIFIED USING
IEEE-535 IN COiilJUVCTIO'3
WITH IEEE-323, THE SPECI-
FICATION REQUIRES FULL
COMPLIA'NCE L'(ITH THESE IEEE
STANDARDS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-45
IEEE 535-1979
~ PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF QUALIFICATION
THE CAPABILITY OF CLASS 1E I EAD STORAGE BAT-
TERIES AND RACKS, INCLUDING INTERFACES, TO
PERFORM THEIR REQUIRED FUNCTIONS SHALL BE
DEMONSTRATED,
IN AGREEMENT WITH THE
PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF
QUALIFICATION,
~ TYPE TESTING
EQUIPMENT TO BE TESTED IS AGED TO AN
ANTICIPATED QUALIFIED LIFE SUBJECTED TO ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES KNOWN TO AFFECT
PERFORMANCE AND OPERATED UNDER SIMULATED
CONDITIONS
e IN AGREEMENT WITH TYPE
TESTING REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT IIIB-06
0
IEEE 555-1979
~ OPERATING EXPERIENCE
BATTERIES AND RACKS THAT HAVE OPERATED
SUCCESSFULLY CAN BE CONSIDERED QUALIFIED
FOR EQUAL OR LESS SEVERE SERVICE,
THE VALIDITYOF OPERATING EXPERIENCE AS
A MEANS OF QUALIFICATION SflALL BE DETER-
MINED FROM THE TYPE AND AMOUNT OF DOCU-
MENTATION SUPPORTING THE SERVICE
CONDITIONS AND TllE PERFORMANCE OF THE
BATTERY AND RACK DURING THIS TIME,
pi
~ IN AGREEMENT WITH TflE
OPERATING EXPERIENCE
PIIILOSOPHY,
EXHIBIT IIIB-07
4
IEEE 555-1979
~ ANALYSIS
QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS SHALL REQUIRE THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A VALID MATHEMATICALMODEL,
THE VALIDITYOF THE MATHEMATICALMODEL SHALL
BE JUSTIFIED BY TEST DATA, OPERATING EXPERIENCE
OR PHYSICAL LANS OF NATURE,
~ NOT CONSIDERED
ACCEPTABLE DUE TO
INABILITYTO CON-.
STRUCT ADEQUATE
MATHEMATICALMODEL,
EXHIBIT IIIB-48
l
S
IEEE 555-1979
e ACCELERATED THERMAL AGING FACTORS ~ IN AGREEMENT WITH TflE ACCEL-
ERATED THERMAL AGING FACTORS,
PLATE
CONSTRUCTION
LEAD CALCIUM—
PASTED 20 10
TEST DAYS AT TEST DAYS AT
62,8 C (145 F) 71 C (160 F)
TO EQUAL 1 YR AT TO EQUAL 1 YR AT
25 C (77 F) 25 C (77 F)
LEAD CALCIUM BATTERIES ARE
USED, SPECIFIED POSITIVE
PLATE POTENTIAL (RELATIVE TO
ELECTROLYTE) DIFFERENTIAL
BETWEEN OPEN CIRCUIT AND
CHARGING CONDITIONS IS MAIN-
TAINED DURING ACCELERATED
AGING AT 160~F,
EXHIBIT IIIB-49
IEEE 555-1979
o DOCUMENTATION
DOCUMENTATION SHALL VERIFY THAT THE BATTERY
AND RACK ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE APPLICATION
AND MEET SPECIFIED PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS,
IN AGREEMENT WITH TllE
DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS,
~ THE USER SHALL MAINTAIN A QUALIFICATION
FILE,
~ IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-50
0
IEEE 627-1980
STANDARD FOR DESIGN QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
USED IN NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
ANDA 0 R Q
o A DESIGN QUALIFICATION PROGRAM FOR SAFETY SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
USED IN A NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATION SHALL INCLUDE
THE FOLLOWING:
(1) QUALIFICATION CRITERIA
(2) A QUALIFICATION PROGRAM TO DEMONSTRATE SATISFACTION OF
QUALIFICATION CRITERIA BY ANALYSIS, TEST, OPERATING
EXPERIENCE OR A COMBINATION'OF THESE,
(3) EVIDENCE OF SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF QUALIFICATION
(4) DOCUMENTATION FILE CONTAINING (1), (2) AND (3),
IN AGREEMENT, IEEE-627
WILL BE USED TO QUALIFY
NON-ELECTR ICAL EQUIPMENT
EXHIBIT IIIB-51
IEEE 627-1980
S 0
FUND H N A U
a TO ESTABLISH EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, IT- SHALL BE DEMON-
STRATED THAT TflE EQUIPMENT CAN PERFORM THE SAFETY FUNC-
TION(S) REQUIRED WHEN OPERATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL
LOADS ARE IMPOSED ON THE EQUIPMENT BY OCCURRENCE OF ANY
POSTULATED SERVICE CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SPECIFICATIONS,
~ IN AGREEMEWT WITH THE
FUNDAI'lENTAL QUALIFI CA-
TION REQUIREMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-52
IEEE 627-1980
APO
o EQUIPMENT SHALL BE QUALIFIED TO VERIFY THAT ITS SPECIFI- ~
CATION CRITERIA ARE SATISFIED, THE CRITERIA GENERALLY
COVER A SINGLE APPLICATION, BUT MAY ENVELOP MORE THAN
ONE APPLICATION, A FAMILY OF EQUIPMENT MAY BE QUALIFIED
BY QUALIFYING ONE OR MORE MEMBERS AND EXTENDING THE
QUALIFICATIOil ACROSS THE FAMILY BY ANALYTICALMETHODS OR
COMPLIANCE WITH GUIDE INES GIVEN IN SPECIFICEQUIPMENT'OCUMENTS,
SUCH ANALYSIS REQUIRES CONSIDERATION OF
SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETERS TO ESTABLISH THE
SIMILARITY OF THE QUALIFIED MEMBER(S) TO THE FAMILY
OF EQUIPMENT.
IN AGREEMENT.WITH TflE
QUALIFICATION
APPROACHES,
EXHIBIT IIIB-55
S
I EEE 627-1980
t
~ THE PRESSURE COfJTAIflNENT INTEGRITY AND PASSIVE STRUCTURAL
REQUIRENENTS OF NECIIANICAL EQUIPNENT COVERED BY ASNE, AISC
OR ACI CODES ARE CONSIDERED QUALIFIED BY ADHERENCE TO
THOSE CODES,
~ DOCUf"lENTATIOf'f
THE QUALIFICATION OF THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DOCUNEHTED BY
QUALIFICATION FILE IN AUDITABLE FORN,
IN AGREENEHT
IN AGREENENT WITff THE
DOCUNENTATION
REQU IRENENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-54
,
IEEE 650-1979QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE STATIC BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS
FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS
1) DESCRIBES METHODS FOR QUALIFYING STATIC BATTERY CHARGERS AND
INVERTERS FOR CLASS lE INSTALLATIONS IN El'lVIRONMENTALLYCON-
TROLlED AREAS OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT, THE PURPOSE OF THIS
STANDARD IS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC PROCEDURES TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE STD 323-1974, QUALIFICATION MAY BE
ACCOMPLISHED IN SEVERAL WAYS: TYPE TESTING, OPERATING
EXPERIENCE, OR ANALYSIS. THESE METHODS MAY BE USED INDIVIDU-
ALLY OR IN COMBINATION, THE QUALIFICATION METHODS IN THIS
STANDARD EMPLOY A COMBINATION OF TYPE TESTING AND ANALYSIS,
OPERATING EXPERIENCE IS A METHOD OF LIMITED USE AS A SOLE
MEANS OF QUALIFICATION, QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS SHALL
INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION OF METHODS, THEORIES, AND ASSUMPTIONS
USED, IN GENERAL, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS ARE TOO
COMPLEX TO BE QUALIFIED BY ANAI YSIS Al ONE ALTHOUGH IT IS
EFFECTIVE IN THE EXTRAPOLATION OF TEST DATA AND DETERMINA-
~ BATTERY CHARGERS
AND INVERTERS
COVERED BY SPECI-
FICATIONS EM-051
AND EM-054
RESPECTIVELY,
ARE BEING
QUALIFIED USING
IEEE-650 IN CON-
JUNCTION WITH
IEEE-323, EACH
SPECIFICATION
REQUIRES FULL
COMPLIANCE WITH
THESE IEEE
STANDARDS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-55
4lI
i
IEEE. 650-1979
TION OF THE EFFECTS OF MINOR DESIGN CHANGES TO
EQUIPMENT PREVIOUSLY TESTED,USE OF THE METHODS
OF THIS STANDARD
ARF CONSIDERED
APPLICABLE TO
OTHER EQUIPMENT
CONTAINING
ELECTRONIC COM-
PONENTS, ASSEMBLIES,
AND NODULES,
EXHIBIT IIIB-55A
''
IEEE 650-1979
2) THE EFFECT OF AGING ON THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS IS NOT
SIGNIFICANT WITHIN THE MAXIMUM QUALIFIED LIFE OBJECTIVE
OF THE EQUIPMENT (TYPICALLY 00 YEARS) WHEN USED WITHIN
THEIR DESIGN RATING:
(A) SILICON SEMICONDUCTORS
(B) RESISTORS
(C) TANTALUM DRY ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS
(D) CERAMIC. CAPAC ITORS
(E) DRY PAPER AND PLASTIC FILM CAPACI'TORS
(F) MICA CAPACITORS
(G) GLASS CAPACITORS
(H) INTEGRATED MICROELECTRONIC DEVICES
(I) HYBRID MICROCIRCUITS
~ IN AGREEMENT WITH
THE AGING STATEMENT,
STRESS CALCULATION
REQUIRED,
EXHIBIT IIlB-56
I I I. 8,4 REGULATORY GUIDE 1.52
CRITERIA FOR SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRIC P01<ER SYSTENS
FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
R QU
THE QUALIFICATION REQUI REf'1ENTS
OF IEEE 508-1974 SHALL BE NET,
IN CONPLIANCE WITH QUALIFICATION
PROVISIONS OF IEEE 508-1974,
EXHIBIT I I IB-57
'
0
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,40
QUALIFICATION TESTS OF CONTINUOUS-DUTY NOTORS INSTALLED
INSIDE THE CONTAINNENT OF MATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
THE QUALIFICATION REQUIRENENTS OF IEEE 334-1971
SHALL BE NET, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
1, AUXILIARYEQUIPNENT THAT WILL BE PART
OF THE INSTALLED NOTOR ASSENBLY SHOULD
ALSO BE QUALIFIED,
NOT APPLICABLE, THERE ARE
NO SAFETY-RELATED CONTINUOUS-
DUTY NOTORS INSTALLED INSIDE
THE CONTAINNENT,
2, TESTS SHOULD S INULATE ALL DESIGN BASIS
EVENTS WHICH AFFECT OPERATION OF THE NOTOR'S
AUXILIARYEQUI PNENT,
EXHIBIT IIIB-58
0'
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,53
APPLICATION OF THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION TO
NUCLEAR PONER PLANT PROTECTION SYSTEMS
THE QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 379-1972
SHALL BE MET,
IN AGREEMENT WITH QUALIFICATION
PROVISIONS OF IEEE 308-1974,
EXHIBIT IIIB-59
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,63
ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES IN CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
FOR LIGHT-HATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
THE QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 317-1976 SHALL BE MET,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
SECTION 6.A.~, "DIELECTRIC-STRENGTH TEST," SHOULD BE SUPPlE-
MENTED, FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING ONLY, BY THE FOLLOWING:/
(3) EACH MEDIUM-VOLTAGE POMER CONDUCTOR SHALL BE GIVEN
AN IMPULSE WITHSTAND TEST BY APPLYING A 1,2 X 50 S IMPULSE
VOLTAGE TEST SERIES CONSISTING OF THREE POSITIVE AND THREE
NEGATIVE IMPULSE VOLTAGES, IF FLASHOVER OCCURS ON ONLY ONE
TEST DURING ANY GROUP OF THREE CONSECUTIVE TESTS, THREE MORE
SHALL BE MADE, IF NO FLASHOVER OCCURS IN THE SECOtlD GROUP
OF TESTS, TllE FLASHOVER IN THE FIRST GROUP SllALL BE CON-
SIDERED RANDOM FLASHOVER AND THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED
AS HAVING PASSED THE TEST,
EXHIBIT I I IB-60
IN AGREEMENT HITH
QUALIFICATION
PROVISIONS OF
IEEE 317-1976,
IN AGREEMENT WITH
REQUIREMENT 1,
1,63
THE TEST VOLTAGES FOR THE ABOVE SHALL BE BASED ON THE VOLTAGE
RATING OF THE CONDUCTOR IH ACCORDANCE MITH TflE FOLLOMING TABLE:
CO U
OS
300 AND 600
1000
5000
8000
15,000
60,000
95,000
95,000
2) THE 500-HOUR AGING TIME AT MINIMUM AGING TEMPERATURE OF SEC-
TION 6.3.3 IS A PRINTING ERROR AND SHOULD BE CHANGED TO
5000 HOURS,
~ IN AGREEMENT
HITH REQUIRE-
MENT 2,
EXHIBIT IIIB-61
- REGULATORY GUIDE 1,73
QUALIFICATION TESTS OF ELECTRIC VALVE OPERATORS INSTALLED
INSIDE THE CONTAINNENT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
THE REQUIRENENTS OF IEEE 382-1972 SHALL BE NET, SUBJECT TO
THE FOLLOWING:
1, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, AUXILIARYEQUIPNENT (E,G„
LINIT SWITCHES) THAT IS NOT INTEGRAL WITH THE VALVE
OPERATOR NECHANISM BUT MILL BE PART OF THE INSTALLED
VALVE OPERATOR ASSEMBLY SHOULD BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE SUBJECT STANDARD,
2, THE TEST SEQUENCE DESCRIBED IN SECTION 4,5,2 OF THE
STANDARD SHOULD BE USED UNLESS THE ANTICIPATED ACTUAL
SERVICE OPERATING SEQUENCE FOR THE VALVE OPERATOR IS
EXPECTED TO CREATE A 'NORE SEVERE OPERATING CONDITION
THAN DESCRIBED IN SECTION 4.5.2. IN SUCH CASE, THE
ACTUAL SERVICE SEQUENCE SHOULD BE USED IN THE TEST,
IN AGREENENT
WITH REQUIRE-
NENT 1,
IN AGREEMENT
WITH REQU IRE-
NENT 2,
EXHIBIT IIIB-62
TO ASSURE THAT THE VALVE OPERATOR IS TESTED UNDER AN
ENVIRONMENT OF SUFFICIENT SEVERITY, THE MAGNITUDE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (E, 6 „TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE,
RADIATION, HUMIDITY) THAT SIMULATE THE CONDITIONS TO
WHICH THE VALVE OPERATOR IS EXPECTED TO BE EXPOSED DURING
AND FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT (SECTION 4,4, SECOND
PARAGRAPH) SHOULD BE BASED ON CONSERVATIVE CALCULATIONS,
THE RADIOLOGICAL SOURCE TERM FOR QUALIFICATION TESTS IN
A NUCLEAR RADIATION ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE BASED ON THE
SAME SOURCE TERM USED IN REGULATORY GUIDE 1,7, "CONTROL
OF COMBUSTIBLE GAS CONCENTRATIONS IN CONTAINMENT FOLLOWING
A LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT," FOR BWRS AND PWRS, THE
CONTAINMENT SIZE SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR EACH
CASE, FOR EXPOSED ORGANIC MATERIALS, CALCULATIONS SHOULD
TAKE INTO ACCOUNT BOTH BETA AND GAMMA RADIATION,
IN AGREEMENT
WITH REQUIRE-
MENT 3,
IN AGREEMENT
WITH REQUIRE-
MENT 4,
(BETA DOSES ARE
UNDER REVIEW)
EXHIBIT IIIB-63
'
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.89QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE EQUIPMENT FOR NUCLEAR PGL'lER PLANTS
R ~
THE REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 323-1974 SHALL
BE MET SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
IN COMPLIAI'lCE AS CLARIFIED BELOW; REFER TO
FSAR SECTIONS 3,10 AND 3,11,
2)
THE SPECIFIC APPLICABILITY OR
ACCEPTABILITY OF IEEE STD 344 WILL BE
COVERED SEPARATELY If'l OTHER REGULA-
TORY GUIDES WHERE APPROPRIATE,
THE RADIOLOGICAL SOURCE TERM FOR
QUALIFICATION TESTS IN A NUCLEAR RADIA-
TION ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE BASED ON THE
SAME SOURCE TERM AS THAT USED IN REGULA-
TORY GUIDE 1.7 (I,E„ 100% OF THE NOBLE
GASES, 50% OF THE HALOGErfS, AND 1% OF .
THE REMAINING SOLIDS), THE CONTAINMENT
SIZE SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN
EACH CASE, FOR EXPOSED ORGANIC MATE-
RIALS, CALCULATIONS SHOULD TAKE INTO
ACCOUflT BOTH BETA AND GAMMA RADIATION.
A, FOR EQUIPMENT THAT HAS BEEN SEISMICALLY
QUALIFIED BY TlfE TESTING PROCEDURES
REFERENCED IN FSAR SECTIOf'l 3.10, PRIOR
TO QUALIFICATION TESTING TO IEEE
323-1974, THE SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF
IEEE-323-1974 OF THE AGED EQUIPMENT IS
BY ANALYSIS USING THE TESTING OUTLINED
IN FSAR SECTIOI'l 3,10 AND, IF NECESSARY,
APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTAL TESTS AS A
BASIS FOR THE ANALYSIS, THIS COMBINED
QUALIFICATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTIONS 5,3 AND 5,4 OF IEEE 323-1974,
JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION OV
EQUIPMENT Ifl T>fIS MANNER WIlL BE PRO-
VIDED ON AN INDIVIDUALBASIS If'l QUALI-
EXHIBIT IIIB 64
B, OBJECTIVES AND METHODS DESCRIBED FOR
AGING ARE DIFFICULT TO APPLY TO MUCH OF
THE EQUIPMENT, THE USE OF THERMAL AND
VIBRATIONALTECHNIQUES TO SIMULATE AGING
MAY BE VALID FOR SOME COMPONENTS (CABLE
OR MOTOR INSULATION), BUT IS NOT VALID
OR PRACTICAL FOR MANY ITEMS, ANY VARI-
ATION IN AGING METHODS OR PROCEDURES
HILL BE IDENTIFIED AND JUSTIFIED ON AN
INDIVIDUALBASIS IN QUALIFICATION
REPORTS,
EXHIBIT IIIB-65
0
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,131
QUALIFICATION TESTS OF ELECTRIC CABLES, FIELD SPLICES, AND CONNECTIONS
FOR LIGHT-WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
THE REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 383-1974 SHALL BE MET, SLlBJECT TO THE
FOl LOWING:
1) ALL DESIGf'l BASIS EVENTS SllOULD BE COf'ISIDERED AS APPLICABLE
TO THE FUfkCTION OF TllE CONPONEflT,
2) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CHARACTERIZATION. OF PRESSURE,
TEMPERATURE, RADIATIOf'l, ETC, SHALL BE PLAl'lT SPECIFIC OR
ACCEPTABLY ENVELOPE PLANT SERVICE CONDITIONS,
3) IF THERE IS NOT SUFFICIEflT EVIDENCE THAT ACCELERATED AGING
TECHNIQUES CAN RELIABLY PRODUCE END-OF-LIFE CONDITIONS, AN
ONGOING QUALIFICATIOfl PROCEDURE SHOULD BE USED, IF ON-GOING
QUALIFICATION DEMONSTRATES THAT THE QUALIFIED LIFE IS LESS
THAN THE DESIGN LIFE, A PERIOD REPLACEMEf'lT Pl AN SHOULD BE
INSTITUTED,EXHIBIT IIIB-66
IN AGREEMENT WIT[i
QUALIFICATION PRO-
VISIONS OF
IEEE 383-1974,
IN AGREEMENT WITH
REQUIREMENT 1
IN AGREEMENT WITff
REQUIREMENT 2,
IN AGREEMEHT WITH
REQUIREMENT 3
RADIoLoGICAL souRCE TERM sHALL BE CONSISTENT MITH
REGUL'ATORY GUIDE 1,89,
5) FLAME RESISTANCE TESTING SHALL INCLUDE BOTH AGED AND UNAGED
CABLE SPECIMENS,
6) INDIVIDUALFIRE TESTS ARE USEFUI TO SCREEN OUT INADEQUATE
MATERIALs, INDIVIDUALTEsTs SHouLD NOT BE CothsTRUED As
QUALIFYING A GROUPED ARRANGEMENT,
7) THE GAS BURNER FLAME SOURCE SHALL RELEASE APPROXIMATELY
70,000 BTU/HR, BURLAP BAG FIRE TESTING IS NOT ENDORSED,
IN AGREEMENT HIT>I
REQUIREMENT LI,
IN AGREEMENT WITH
REQUIREMENT 5,
IN AGREEMENT MITII
REQUIREMENT 6,
PVNGS CABLES ARE
TESTED AT 70,000
BTU BURNER INPUT
OR HIGHER,
EXHIBIT I I IB-67
III,B,5 NUREG-0588
INTERIM STAFF POSITION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF
SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
~ POSITIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO PLANTS THAT ARE, OR HILL BE, IN THE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
(CP) OR OPERATING LICENSE (OL) REVIEW PROCESS AND THAT ARE REQUIRED TO SATISFY THE
REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN EITHER IEEE-323-1971 OR 1974,
~ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RESULTING FROM REVIEl< OF THE THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 2 EVENT ARE
NOT INCLUDED,
POSITIONS PROVIDE GUIDANCE ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SERVICE CONDITIONS, METHODS OF QUALI-
FICATION AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS, SEISMIC QUALIFICATION IS NOT COVERED,
~ EQUIPMENT REFERS TO SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR ACCIDENT MITI-
GATION, POST ACCIDENT MONITORING AND SAFE SHUTDOWN,
~ PVNGS MUST COI'lFORM HITH STAFF POSITIONS OF NUREG 0588 CATEGORY 1 (IEEE 323-1974),
EXHIBIT IIIB-68
NUREG-0588
S
~ CALCULATE LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT TEMPERATURE AND
PRESSURE ENVIRONMENT USING CONTEMPT-LT OR EQUIVA-
LENT INDUSTRY CODES, ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FROM SRP
SECTION 6,2,1,1, A (NUREG-75/087),
~ MAIN STEAM LINE BREAK INSIDE CONTAINMENT ENVIRON-
MENTAL PARAMETERS SHOULD BE CALCULATED FROM PLANT
SPECIFIC MODEL REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY STAFF,
o CHEMICAI SPRAY SHOULD BE ADDRESSED FOR EQUIPMENT
QUALIFICATION,
~ RADIATION ENVIRONMENT.SHOULD BE BASED ON THE
NORMAL RADIATION ENVIRONMENT PLUS THAT ASSOCI-
ATED YlITH THE MOST SEVERE DBA, DBA OCCURS AT
END OF EQUIPMENT QUALIFIED LIFE, BETA RADIATION
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED,
IN COMPLIANCE, COPATTA
CODE HAS USED (DERIVED
FROM CONTEMPT),
~ PLANT SPECIFIC PARAMETERS
ARE USED,
~ IN AGREEMENT THAT CHEMICAL
SPRAY BE ADDRESSED,
~ IN AGREEMENT,
BETA EFFECTS ARE UNDER
REVIEW,
EXHIBIT IIIB-69
'
NUREG-0588
~ FOR EQUIPMEl'lT INSIDE CONTAINMENT TYPE
TESTING SHOULD BE EMPLOYED FOR
QUALIFICATION,
~ TEMPERATURE OF EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE
DEFINED BY THERMOCOUPLE READING ON OR
NEAR EQUIPMENT SURFACE,
o EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO OPERATE HITHIN
SECONDS OR MINUTES INTO DBA MUST BE
OPERABLE FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 1 HOUR
IN EXCESS OF THE TIME ASSUMED IN THE
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS,
e AGING EFFECTS SEIOULD BE CONSIDERED AND
INCLUDED IN QUALIFICATION PROGRAMS,
o ARRHENIUS METHODOIOGY IS CONSIDERED AN
ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF ADDRESSING AGING
EXHIBIT IIIB-70
~ IN AGREENENT I'IETHODS AND
SEQUENCE OF IEEE 323-1979 ARE
SPECIFIED,
~ SEPARATI Of'1 PRECLUDES FAILURE
OF REDUNDAN7 EQUIPMENT,
~ IN AGREEMENT
IN AGREEMENT THAT AGING EFFECTS
BE CONSIDERED AND INCLUDED IN
QUALIFICATION PROGRAMS,
~ IN AGREEMENT THAT THE ARRHENIUS
METHOD IS ACCEPTABLE FOR AGING,
NUREG-0588
G S
~ - PERIODIC SURVEILLANCE TESTING UNDER
NORMAL SERVICE CONDITIONS IS NOT
CONSIDERED AN ACCEPTABLE METHOD FOR
ONGOING QUALIFICATION,
~ DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE
323-1970 ARE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE,
~ IN AGREENENT, 'PERIODIC
TESTING OF EQUIPMENT WITH
SOME PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
QUALIFIED LIFE IS ACCEPTABLE
FOR AN ONGOING PROGRAM,
o IN AGREEMENT WITH DOCUMENTA-
TION REQUIREMENTS,
(NOTE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ON NUREG 0588 DOCUMENTATION
REQUIREMENTS AND PVNGS
PRESENTATION FORMAT IS PRO-
VIDED IN PART V),
EXHIBIT IIIB-71
0
I I I,B,6 COMMISS ION ORDER CLI-80-21
ALL APPLICANTS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
OF NUREG 0588,
IN AGREEMENT,
WILL FOLLOW GUIDANCE OF
CATEGORY I ( IEEE 323-74)
EXHIBIT IIIB-72
S
I I I .B,7 IE BULLETIl'l 79-01B
1) COMPLY WITH NUREG 0588, IN AGREENENT — CATEGORY j. OF NUREG 0588
APPLIES,
2) REVIEti FSAR SERVICE CONDITIONS FOR DBA
AND ENSURE ALL SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT
IS QUALIFIED FOR DBA. SPECIFICALLY
REVIEW THE FOLLOHING SERVICE CONDITIONS:
A, TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE STEAM
CONDITIONS
~ FSAR TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE
SERVICE CONDITIONS ARE CORRECT,
IN AGREEMENT,
B, RADIATION (CONSIDER GAMMA AND BETA
DOSES UNLESS BETA DOSE IS LESS THAN
10% OF GAMMA DOSE,)
~ (A) GAMMA DOSES IN FSAR REFLECT
TID 14800 SOURCES,
IN AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT IIIB-75
0,
IE 79-018
(B) BETA DOSES NOT INCLUDED IN
FSAR, EFFECT OF BETA DOSE
ON METALLIC COMPONENTS (PIPES,
VALVES, CABINETS) IS NOT SIG-
NIFICANT. EFFECT OF BETA
DOSES ON NON-METALLIC COMPO-
NENTS IS UNDER REVIB,
C, SUBMERGENCE
D. SPRAY CHEMICAI S
~ SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL COMPO-
NENTS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CONTAINMENT
FLOOD LEVEL,
~ SPRAY CHENISTRY IS INCLUDED IN
ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION FOR
QUALIFICATION.
EXHIBIT IIIB-7Q
I
0
III,B.8 10CFR50 APP B,
QUALITY ASSURANCE CRITERIA
EVERY APPLICANT FOR AN OPERATING LICENSE
IS REQUIRED TO INCLUDE INFORMATION
PERTAINING TO MANAGERIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
CONTROLS TO BE USED TO ASSURE SAFE
OPERATION,
~ PVNGS MEETS FULL REQUIREMENTS OF
lOCFR50 APPENDIX B,
~ THE APPLICANT SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT AND EXECUTION
OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE
PROGRAM,
EXHIBIT IIIB-75
4i
I I I, 8, 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATION
1, PARAMETER VALUES MERE CALCULATED BY APPROPRIATELY CONSERVATIVE ANALYSES.
2, VALUES HAVE BEEN GROUPED ON THE BASIS OF PLANT ARRANGENENT TO FORM MAXIMUM LIMITS
FOR EACH IDENTIFIED AREA,
EXHIBIT IIIB-76
4I
0'
MAINSTEAM SUPPORT STRUCTURE
CONTAINMENTBLDG
TURBINE BUILDING
AUXILIARYBLDG
FUEL BLDG
RADWASTE BUILDING
II
rI
DIESEL GENBUILDING
CONTROL BUILDING
LAUNDRY'ECONTAMINATIONFACILITYIUNIT1 ONLYI
PLANT NORTH
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
FIGURE 12
0
ENVIRONMENTALDESIGNATORS
0II:
M.S.S.S.
CONT'M'T.o BLDG~0 0Qoa
AUX. BLDG.
nIII-
. o H
Q
-0 9 'jj
LCD (CD CD
o ~ ~ a
CONTROL BLDG.
'~i~= '0r Q
DIESEL GEN
BLDG
FIGURE i3
i
CONDITION DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)
PARAMETER
TEMPERATURE 50 — 120
(F)
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
LOCA
350350
302302-270270-200
370
350
302302-270
270-200
4 MIN
8 MIN
8 HR
42 HR
2 MK
NsLB DUUi50N
PRESSURE
(PSIG)
RELATIYE
HUMIDITY
(K)
ATM,
20 — 90%-
60
55
25
10
STEAM/AIR MIXTURE
12 MIN
8 HR
42 HR
2 MK
RADIATION - 1 x 10(RADS)
(40 YEAR
INTEGRATED
DOSE)
CHEMICALS
3,3 x 10 GAMMA
2 x 108 BETA (NON-SPRAYED
ENCLOSURES)
1 x 10 BETA (ALL OTHER
AREAS)
~ 4400 PPM BORON
~ 50 PPM HYDRAZINE
~ pH ADJUSTED TO 7,0-8,5AFTER 4 HOURS USING
TR I SODIUM PHOSPHATE
TABLE 2 (SHEET j. OF 2)
0
0
CONDITION
CONTAINMEHT BUILD I HG— ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR I
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
PARAMETER
SUBMERGENCE NONE
LOCA/MSLB
BELOW PLANT EL, 91'.
DUST 1,52 vG/M~ 650 vG/M~
SEISMIC 2 OBE'S
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
1 SSE
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR
LIFE FOR EHVIROtJMENTAL
PARAMETERS
EQUIPMENT MUST BE.
QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR
LIFE PLUS DBA FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
TABLE 2 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
e,
0
0
CONDITION
PARAMETER
MAIN STEAM SUPPORT STRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR II
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
LOCA/MSLB
TEMPERATURE
(F)
PRESSURE
(PSIG)
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
(%)
RADIATION
(RADS)
(40 YEAR
INTEGRATED
DOSE)
CHEMICALS
28 — 120
ATM
20 — 90X
(103
NONE
300 (ABOVE 100')
21 (ABOVE 100')
STEAM/AIR MIXTURE
(ABOVE 100')
106 (ABOVE 100')
TABLE 3 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
0
0
P
MAIN STEAM SUPPORT STRUCTURE — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR II
COND IT ION
PARAMETER
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
LOCA/MSLB
SUBMERGENCE NONE NONE
DUST
- SEISMIC
1,52 vG/M (BELOW EL, 100')61,3 vG/M3 (ABOVE EL, 100')
2 OBE'S
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
.650 vG/M (BELOW EL, 100')131 MG/M3 (ABOVE EL, 100')
1 SSE
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PARAMETERS
EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE PLUS DBA FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
TABLE 3 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
e
0
CONDITION
AUXILIARYBUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR III
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
PARAMETER
TEMPERATURE
(F)
PRESSURE
(PSIG)
50 -104
ATM
LOCA/MSLB
50 — 104
ATM
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
(%)
RADIATION
(RADS)
(40 YEAR
INTEGRATED
DOSE)
CHEMICALS
20 — 90%
5,5 X 10 (ACCESSIBLE AREAS)
1,25 X 10 (VOLUME CONTROL
TANK)
2,7 X 109 (PURIFICATION ION
EXCH,)
NONE
20 — 90%
1 X 10 (ACCESSIBLE AREAS)
1,25 X 10/ (VOLUME CONTROL TANK)
2,7 X 109'. (PURIFICATION ION
EXCH,)'ONE
TABLE 4 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
I
AUXILIARYBUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR I I I
COriDITION
PARAMETER
SUBf'lERGENCE
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
LOCA/NSLB
DUST 1,52 vG/N~ 650 vG/N~
SEISMIC 2 OBE'S
(REFER TO SEISNiIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
1- SSE
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
DYfIIAI'lIC REFER TO EQUIPf'1ENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIRENENTS
REFER TO EQUIPNENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIRENENTS
EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR
LIFE FOR ENVIRONfIENTAL
PARAMETERS
TABLE LI (SHEET 2 OF 2)
EQUIPNENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR
LIFE PLUS DBA FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PARANETERS
0
0
CONTROL BUILDING - ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR IV
CONDITION
PARAMETER
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
(INCI UDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)
LOCA/MSLB
TEMPERATURE
(F)CONTROL ROOM 75+5
ELEC, EQUIP, ROOMS
(EL, 100') 60-77
OTHER 40-104
CONTROL ROOM 75+5
ELEC, EQUIP, ROOMS
(EL, 100') 60-104
OTHER 40-104
PRESSURE
(PSIG)
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
(%)
RADIATION
(RADS)
(40 YEAR
INTEGRATED
DOSE)
CHEMICALS
ATM
CONTROL AND ELEC, EQUIP,
ROOMS (EL, 100') 40-60%
OTHER 20 — 90%
(IP5
NONE
. ATM
CONTROL AND ELEC, EQUIP, ROOMS
(EL, 100') 40-60%
OTHER 20 — 90%
(10
NONE
TABLE 5 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
e,
0
CONDITION
PARAMETER
CONTROL BUILDIiNG — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG[3ATOR IV
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
LOCA/MSLB
SUBMERGENCE NONE NONE
DUST 1,52 iG/M~ 420 i G/M~
SEISMIC 2 OBE'S
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
1 SSE
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
.REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PARAMETERS
TABLE 5 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE PLUS DBA FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
0
0
COND IT ION
PARAMETER
DIESEL GENERATOR BUII DING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR V
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
LOCA/MSLB
TEMPERATURE.
(F)
PRESSURE
(PSIG)
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
(%)
.RADIATION(RADS)
(40 YEAR
INTEGRATED
DOSE)
CHEMICALS
50 — 122 (D,G, CONTROL ROON)
50 — 140 (D,G, AREA)
ATM
<10
NONE
50 - 122 (D,G, CONTROL ROON)
50 — 140 (D,G. AREA)
ATM
<105
NONE
TABLE 6 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR V
CONDITION
PARAMETER
SUBMERGENCE
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
LOCA/MSLB
DUST
SEISMIC
1,52 ~G/M3 (D,G, CONTROL ROON)
61,3 ~G/M3 (D,G, AREA)
2 OBE'S
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
420 ~G/M3 (D,G,CONTROL'OOM)
131 MG/M3 (D.G, AREA)
1 SSE
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
'REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PARAMETERS
TABLE 6 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE PLUS DBA FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
0
1
CONDITION
FUEL BUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR V I
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
PARAMETER
TEMPERATURE
(F)
PRESSURE
(PSIG)
RELATIVE
HUMID]TY
(%)
'ADIATION
(RADS)
(40 YEAR
INTEGRATED
DOSE)
CHEMICALS
50 — 104
ATM
20 — 90%
<10
LOCA/MSLB
50 — 104
ATM
20 — 90%
10'ONE
TABLE 7 (SflEET 1 OF 2)
0
0
FUEL BUILDING - ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR VI
CONDITION
PARAMETER
SUBMERGENCE
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
NONE
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
LOCA/MSLB
NONE
DUST 1,52 ~G/M 650 vG/M~
SEISMIC 2 OBE'S
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
1 SSE
-(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
. REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIfICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PARAMETERS
TABLE 7 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
EQUIPMENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE PLUS DBA FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
0
0
CONDITION
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)
OUTSIDE AREAS — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR YII
PARAMETER
TEMPERATURE
(F)
PRESSURE
(PS!G)
RELATIYE
HUMIDITY
(%)
RAD IATION
(RADS)
(40 YEAR
INTEGRATED
DOSE)
CHEMICALS
25 — 116
ATM
U .— 100%
(103
NONE
LOCA/MSLB
25 — 116
ATM
13 — 100%
(103
TABLF 8 (SfIEET 1 OF 2)
0
hi
),I
0
0OUTSIDE AREAS — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR VI I
COND ITION
PARAMETER
SUBMERGENCE
NORMAL/ABNORMAL
DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT
LOCA/MSLB
NOr<E
DUST 61,3 ~e/M3
(GEOMETRIC MEAN)
131 ve/M3
SEISMIC 2 OBE'S
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
1 SSE
(REFER TO SEISMIC
RESPONSE SPECTRA)
DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT
, SPECIFICATIONS FOR
REQUIREMENTS
REFER TO EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
- REQUIREMENTS
AGING EQUIPttENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PARAMETERS
. TABLE 8 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
EQUIPNENT MUST BE
QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR
LI'FE PLUS DBA FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
e
e
l
li
PVNGSSITEINVESTIGATION
SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA
FREE-FIELD SPECTRAREG
GUIDE'l.60
IN-STRU CTURESEISMIC DATA
REG
GUIDE1.61
REG
GUIDE1.29
EQUIPMENTSPEC IF I CATIO NS
STANDARDIZEDSEISMICQUALIFICATIONREQUIREMENTS
SUPPLIERPROGRAM
SEISMIC QUALlFICATION
FIGURE 14
0
EVEHT
SEISMIC LEVEL
SELECTED BASED
ON SITE II'lVESTIGATION
SEISMIC LEVEL
USED IN DESIGN OF
STRUCTURES R EQUIPMENT
SAFE SHUTDOI'JH EARTHQUAKE (SSE) 0,20G 0,2SG
OPERATIHG BASIS EARTHQUAKE (OBE) 0,10G 0,15G
PVNGS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA
TABLE 9
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,60
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR SEISMIC DESIGN
OF NUCLEAR POHER PLANTS
G 0
1) THE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL COMPONENT GROUND DESIGN
RESPONSE SPECTRA, WITHOUT SOIL-STRUCTURE INTER-
ACTION EFFECTS, OF THE SSE, 1/2 TklE SSE, OR THE
OBE Old SITES UNDERLAIN BY ROCK OR BY SOIL SHOULD
BE LINEARLY SCALED FROM TIIEIR RESPECTIVE
HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL DESIGN RESPOI'1SESPECTRA'RESENTED
IH THE REG, GUIDE IN 1,60-1 IN
PROPORTIOtl TO THE MAXIMUM flORIZONTAL GROUND
ACCELERATIOlh SPECIFIED FOR THE EARTllOUAKE
CHOSEN,
II AGREEMENT, FIGURE 1,G0-1 I
SHOMS THE PVNGS llORIZONTAL
RESPONSE SPECTRA IN COM-
PARISON TO TklE REG GUIDE
SPECTRA,
EXHIBIT I I IC-1
0
0
.0
1000
500
200
100
CQCh
50
20Cl
O10
Og
C~C~
Pgb'n
++c+
~oDISPLACEMENT = 36 in.FOR 1.0g MAX GROUNDACCELERATION
DAMPING FACTOR,%
0.5
2
5
7
10
o
~o
10
20
50
100
,I
0.5
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.1 0.2 0.5 "'2 5
FREQUENCY, cps
10 20 50 100
PVNGS 0;25 g DESIGNSPECTRA FOR 2% DAMPING
HORIZONTAL DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRA —SCALED TO 1g HORIZONTAL
GROUND ACCELERATION
FIGURE 1.60.l
0'
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.61
DAMPING VALUES
(PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING)
STRUCTURE OR COMPONENT
OPERATING BASIS
EARTHQUAKE OR 1/2 SAFE
SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE
SAFE SHUTDOWN
EARTHQUAKE
EQUIPMENT AND LARGE-DIAMETER PIPING SYSTEMS,
PIPE DIAMETER GREATER THAN 12 IN,
SMALL-D-IANETER PIPING SYSTEMS, DIAMETER EQUAL
TO OR LESS THAN 12 IN,
WELDED STEEL STRUCTURES ,
BOLTED STEEL. STRUCTURES ,
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES ,
REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
TABLE 10
5.6DAMPING
0.5%
, 4.81%
4,02%
3.2tDI-cC
~ Z.4
5%
10%
1.6
0.80.56g
0.01 0.10
PERIOD (SEC)
1.00 10.00
'.-AUXILIARYBUILDING SSE HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION
RESPONSE SPECTRA EL 100'.0'0, ROOF -,
FIGURE 15
30
20f
10
4
'IRC)
2cCCC
1.0
0.8
' I~ I
NOTE -,
3
I ~
I I ~
I I I l I
NOTE; .
I 2 MII
I i II, I ~
= NOTES:
,-f 'I. SSE GROUND ACCELERATION = 025g.'-'. DAMPING ~2%
"', 3. DAMPING ~3%
.. 4. ELEVATION HIGHEST EQUIPMENTFLOOR LEVEL (178 FT)
.". 5. APPLICABLETO BOTH HORIZONTALAND VERTICAL DIRECTIONS, ALLBLDGS '.
I
~lf~ I
'I ~ +
I I ~
~ Q
-.: ZPA (ZERO PERIOD ACCELERATION)
:: WALL-MOUNTEDAND FLOOR-MOUNTED.=.—,. " CONTROL PANEL ASSEMBLIES
0.4~
'.2
l
0 1
1 4 6 8
I i I ~
I I II ~ I I l ~ I ~
10 20 40 70 100 200 400 600 800
FREQUENCY IN HZ
.:REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM (RRS) FOR SSE FOR PALO VERDE
NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ...„.:,,'..., .'...« ~ I .fflI >* " ',III'..~ . ~ ~ l -..«I ~, ~
FIGURE 16
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,29
SEISMIC DESIGN CLASSIFICATION
1) SPECIFIES THE STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS
OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REQUIRED TO BE DESIGNATED
AS SEISMIC CATEGORY I AND WHICH MUST BE DESIGNED
TO WITHSTAND THE EFFECTS OF THE SSE AND REMAIN
FUNCTIONAL, Tl-lE PERT INENT QUALITY ASSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS OF APPENDIX B TO 10 CFR PART 50
SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ALL ACTIVITIES AFFECTING THE
SAFETY-RELATED FUNCTIONS OF THESE STRUCTURES,
SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS,
IN AGREENEIIT, A LISTING
OF ALL SEISMIC CATEGORY I
STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND
COMPONENTS FOR PVNGS IS
PROVIDED IN FSAR TABLE 5,2-1, .
EXHIBIT IIIC-2
0
0h
0STANDARDIZED SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX 4E SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC
CATEGORY I ACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
APPENDIX 4H TECH'AICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE EQUIPMENT
E.PPENDIX 4J SEISHIC QUALIFICATIO,"I FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I '.lOAACTIVE MEClkAihICAL
EQUIP ME'AT
EXHIBIT IIIC-5
0
0
STANDARDIZED SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)
APPENDIX 4T SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL AND
INSTRUMENTATION DEVICES
APPENDIX 4U SEISMIC QUAI IFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL PANEL
ASSEMBLIES
APPENDIX 4V QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, DEVICES,
AND INSTRUMENTATION
EXHIBIT IIIC-4
0
SAFETY SYSTEMSEISMIC QUALIFICATION
STANDARDREVIEWPLAN3.9.2, REV 1
STANDARDREVIEWPLAN3.9.3, REV 0
STANDARDREVIEWPLAN3.10, REV 0
REGULATORYGUIDES
GENERALDESIGNCRITERIA
GENERALDESIGNCRITERIA
GENERALDESIGNCRITERIA
RG 1.60
RG 1.61
GOC1
GDC2
GDC4
GDC14
GD C-1
GOC-2
GDC4
IEEE 344-1975
GOC2
IEEE 344-1975
RG 1.92
RG 1.100
RG 1.124
RG 1.130.
GDC 15
REGULATORYGUIDES
REGULATORYGUIDES
RG 1.48
RG 1.20 RG 1.67
RG 1.68
FIGURE 17
0,
III, C,2 STANDARD REYIEW PLAN ",9,2, REY, j.
DYNAMIC TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND EQUIPMENT
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
1) A TEST PROGRAM IS REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE ABILITY OF
ALL SEISMIC CATEGORY I MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO
FUNCTION AS NEEDED DURING AND AFTER AN EARTHQUAKE
OF MAGNITUDE UP TO AND INCLUDING TflE SSE,
A, ANALYSIS WITHOUT TESTING IS ACCEPTABLE IF
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ALONE CAN ASSURE THE
INTENDED FUNCTION, WHEN A COMPLETE SEISMIC
TEST IS IMPRACTICABIE, A COMBINATION OF
TEST AND ANALYSIS IS ACCEPTABLE,
I~i AGREEMENT.
(TESTING PREFERRED)
EXHIBIT I I IC-5
SRP 5,9,2
B, EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE TESTED IN THE OPERATIONAL
CONDITION, LOADINGS SIMULATING THOSE OF
PLANT NORMAL OPERATION, SUCH AS THERMAL AND
FLOW-INDUCED LOADINGS, IF ANY, SHOULD BE
CONCURRENTLY SUPERIMPOSED UPON THE SEISMIC
LOADING. OPERABILITY SHOULD BE VERI F I ED
DURING AND AFTER THE TEST,
I.'l AGREEMENT,
C, THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SEISMIC INPUT
MOTION SHOULD BE SPECIFIED BY RESPONSE
SPECTRUM, POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY FUNCTION,
OR tIME HISTORY,:
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-6
SRP 3,9,2
D, THE TEST INPUT MOTION SHOULD-- BE CHARACTERIZED
IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE SEISMIC INPUT
MOTION, AND THE CONSERVATISM IN AMPLITUDE AND
FREQUENCY CONTENT SHOULD BE DEMONSTRATED,
Il AGREEMENT,
E, SEISMIC EXCITATIONS GENERALLY HAVE A BROAD
FREQUENCY CONTENT, MULTI-FREQUENCY INPUT
MOTION SHOULD BE USED IN THE TESTING,
I:l AGREEMENT,
(1-33 HZ)
F, THE TEST INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE APPLIED TO
ONE VERTICAL AXIS AND ONE PRINCIPAL HORIZONTAL
AXIS (OR THO ORTHOGONAL HORIZONTAL AXES)
SIMULTANEOUSLY UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED
THAT THE EQUIPMENT RESPONSE IN THE VERTICAL
DIRECTION IS NOT SENSITIVE TO THE VIBRATORY
MOTIOrl IN THE HORIZONTAL DIRECTION, AND
VICE VERSA, EXHIBIT I I IC-7
I.'l AGREEMENT,
e
0
SRP 3,9,2
G, DYNAMIC COUPLING BETWEEN THE EQUIPMENT AND
RELATED SYSTEMS, IF ANY, SUCH AS CONNECTED
PIPING AND OTHER MECHANICAL COMPONENTS,
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED,
IN AGREEI'1ENT,
H, THE FIXTURE DESIGN SHOULD SIMULATE THE ACTUAL
SERVICE MOUNTING AND CAUSE NO EXTRANEOUS
DYNAf'1IC COUPLING TO THE TEST ITEM,
IN AGREEMENT,
I. THE IN SITU APPLICATION OF VIBRATORY DEVICES
TO SUPERIMPOSE THE SEISMIC VIBRATORY
LOADINGS ON A COMPLEX ACTIVE DEVICE FOR
OPERABILITY TESTING IS ACCEPTABLE IF IT IS
SHOWN THAT A flEANINGFUL TEST CAN BE MADE
IN Tl-lIS WAY.
IN AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT IIIC-8
4
1
SRP 5,9,2
GS 0
J, THE TEST PROGRAM f'lAY BE BASED UPON SELECTIVELY
TESTING A REPRESENTATIVE NUMBER OF MECHANICAL
COMPONENTS ACCORDING TO TYPE, LOAD LEVEL,
SIZE, ETC., ON A PROTOTYPE BASIS,
IN AGREEMENT,
ANALYSES OR TESTS SHOULD BE PERFORl'lED FOR ALL
SUPPORTS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO ASSURE
THEIR STRUCTURAL CAPABILITY TO WITHSTAND
SEISMIC EXCITATION, THE ANALYTICALRESULTS
MUST INCLUDE CHARACTERIZATION OF REQUIRED
INPUT MOTIONS TO THE MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, AND
EVIDENCE THAT THE COMBINED STRESSES OF THE
SUPPORT STRUCTURES ARE MITHIN THE LIMITS OF
THE ASME CODE, SUBSECTION NF, "COMPONENT
SUPPORT STRUCTURES,-
- IN AGREEMENT,
EXH IBIT I I IC-9
4
SRP 5,9,2
L, SUPPORTS SHOULD BE TESTED WITH EQUIPMENT
INSTALLED OR WITH AN EQUIVALENT MASS THAT
SIMULATES THE EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC COUPLING TO
THE SUPPORT,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-10
0
e
STANDARD REVIEW PLAN 3,9,3
ASME CODE CLASS 1, 2, AND 3 COMPONENTS, COMPOjNENT SUPPORTS
AND CORE SUPPORT STRUCTURES
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
1) QUALIFICATION TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SRP
OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH IEEE 344-1975 AND
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,100,
IN AGREEMEllT,
2) PUMP AND VALVE SUPPORT STRESS LIMITS SHALL BE
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ASME CODE, SUBSECTION NF,
COMPONENT SUPPORT STRESS LIMITS SHALL MEET THE
CRITERIA OF REGULATORY GUIDES 1,124 AND 1,130,
I"l AGREEMENT, HOWEVER,
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,130
IS NOT APPLICABLE SINCE
THERE ARE NO CLASS 1
PLATE-AND-SHELL SUPPORTS
FOR BOP COMPONENTS
EXHIBIT I I IC-11
0
0
SRP 3.9,3
EQU
3) THE REQUIREf1ENTS OF REGULATORY GUIDE 1,67 SHALL
BE NET.
REGLATORY GUIDE 1,67
ADDRESSES DESIGN CONCERNS
ONLY AND IS THUS NOT
APPlICABLE TO THIS
PRESENTATION,
EXH IBIT I I IC-12
0
0
STANDARD REVIB< PLAN 3,10, REV, 0
SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CATEGORY I INSTRUMENTATION AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
1) SE
A, TESTS AND ANALYSES ARE REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE
FUNCTIONAL OPERABILITY OF ALL SEISMIC CATEGORY I
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION DURING
AND AFTER AN EARTHQUAKE OF MAGNITUDE UP TO AND
INCLUDING THE SSE, ANALYSES ALONE, lr(ITHOUT
TESTING, ARE ACCEPTABLE AS A BASIS FOR SEISMIC
QUALIFICATION ONLY IF THE NECESSARY FUNCTIONAL =
OPERABILITY OF TViE INSTRUMENTATION OR EQUIPMENT
IS ASSURED BY ITS STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ALONE,
NHEN COMPLETE SEISMIC TESTING IS IMPRACTICAL,
A COMBINATION OF TESTS AND ANALYSES IS ACCEPTABLE,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-13
e
P
SRP 3,10
B, THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE REQUIRED (SEISMIC)
INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE SPECIFIED=BY RESPONSE
SPECTRUM, POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY FUNCTION, OR
TIME HISTORY METHODS. THESE CHARACTERISTICS,
DERIVED FROM THE STRUCTURES OR SYSTEMS SEISMIC
ANALYSIS, SHOULD BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
SEISMIC INPUT MOTION AT THE EQUIPMENT
MOUNTING LOCATIONS,
IN AGREEMENT,
C, EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE TESTED IN THE OPERATIONAL
CONDITION, OPERABILITY SHOULD BE VERIFIED
DURING AND AFTER,THE TESTING,
IN AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT I I IC-14
O
0
I
0l
SRP 3,10
D. THE ACTUAL (TEST) INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE
CHARACTERIZED IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE, REQUIRED
INPUT MOTION, AND THE CONSERVATISM IN AMPLITUDE
AND FREQUENCY CONTENT SHOULD BE DEMONSTRATED.
IN AGREENE'-tT,
E, RANDOM VIBRATION INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE USED,
HOWEVER, SINGLE FREQUENCY INPUT MOTIONS ARE
ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
REQUIRED INPUT MOTION INDICATE THAT THE MOTION
IS, DOMINATED BY ONE FREQUENCY, THE ANTICIPATED
RESPONSE OF THE EQUIPMENT IS ADEQUATELY REPRESENTED
BY ONE MODE, OR THE INPUT HAS SUFFICIENT INTENSITY
AND DURATION TO EXCITE ALL MODES TO THE REQUIRED
AMPLITUDES SUCH THAT THE TESTING RESPONSE SPECTRA
MILL ENVELOPE THE CORRESPONDING RESPONSE SPECTRA
OF THE INDIVIDUALMODES,
EXHIBIT IIIC-15
IN AGREEMENT,
e'
t
SRP 5,10
F, THE TEST INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ONE
VERTICAL AXIS AND ONE PRINCIPAL HORIZONTAL AXIS
(OR TWO ORTHOGONAL flORIZONTAL AXES) SIMULTANEOUSLY
UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE EQUIPMENT
RESPONSE IN THE VERTICAL DIRECTION IS NOT
SENSITIVE TO THE VIBRATORY MOTION IN THE
HORIZONTAL DIRECTION, AND VICE.VERSA,
IN AGREEMENT,
G. THE FIXTURE DESIGN SHOULD SIMULATE THE ACTUAL
SERVICE MOUNTING AND SHOULD NOT CAUSE ANY
EXTRANEOUS DYNAM.IC COUPLING TO THE TEST ITEM.
IN AGREEMENT,
EXH IBIT I I IC-16
0
SRP 5,10
01
H, THE IN SITU APPLICATION OF VIBRATORY DEVICES TO
SUPERINPOSE THE SEISNIC VIBRATOR NOTIONS ON A
COMPLEX ACTIVE DEVICE FOR OPERABILITY TESTING
IS ACCEPTABLE MHEN IT IS SHOMN THAT A NEANINGFUL
TEST CAN BE HADE IN THIS MAY,
IN AGREENENT,
I. THE TEST PROGRAN MAY BE BASED UPON SELECTIVELY
TESTING A REPRESENTATIVE NUNBER OF CONPONENTS
ACCORDING TO TYPE. LOAD LEVEL. SIZE. ETC, ON
A PROTOTYPE BASIS,
IN AGREENENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-17
1;
SRP 5,10
2) S
A. ANALYSES OR TESTS StlOULD BE PERFORMED FOR ALL
SUPPORTS OF SEISMIC CATEGORY I ELECTRICAL
EQUIPMENT AthD INSTRUMENTATION TO ASSURE THEIR
STRUCTURAL CAPABILITY TO WITHSTAND SEISMIC
EXCITATION,
IN AGREEMENT,
B, THE ANALYTICALRESULTS SHOULD INCLUDE THE REQUIRED
INPUT MOTIONS TO THE MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AS OBTAINED
AND CIIARACTERIZED IN THE MANNER STATED IN A(2),
ABOVE AND THE COMBIl'lED STRESSES OF THE SUPPORT
STRUCTURES SHOULD BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE ASME
CODE, SECTION III, SUBSECTION NF, "COMPONENT
SUPPORT STRUCTURES",
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-18
SRP 5,10
V G
C, SUPPORTS Sl-IOULD BE TESTED WITH EQUIPMENT
INSTALLED OR WITH A DUMMY SIMULATING THE
EQUIVALENT EQUIPMENT INERTIAL.MASS EFFECTS AND
DYNAMIC COUPLING TO THE SUPPORT, IF THE EQUIP-
f'lENT IS INSTALLED IN A NONOPERATIONAL MODE FOR
THE SUPPORT TEST, THE RESPONSE IH THE TEST AT
THE EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATION SHOULD BE
MONITORED AND CHARACTERIZED IH THE MANNER AS
STATED If1 A(2), ABOVE, IN SUCH A CASE, EQUIP-
MENT SHOULD BE TESTED SEPARATELY FOR OPERABILITY
AND THE ACTUAL INPUT MOTION TO THE EQUIPMENT IN
THIS TEST SHOULD. BE MORE CONSERVATIVE IN
AMPLITUDE AND FREQUENCY CONTENT THAN THE
MONITORED RESPONSE FROf'I THE SUPPORT TEST,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-19
0
0
N
SRP 3,10
3) DOCUNENTATION REQUIRED TO DENONSTRATE EQUIPNENT
SEISNIC QUALIFICATION SHALL BE RETAINED,
IN A6REEHENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-20
0
J
0
III, C,5 10CFR50 APP A,
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹1, QUALITY
STANDARDS AND RECORDS
STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IMPORTANT
TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGtxiED, AflD TESTED TO
QUALITY STANDARDS COMMENSURATE WITH THE
SAFETY FUNCTION TO BE PERFORMED. APPROPRIATE
RECORDS OF TESTItlG SflALL BE MAINTAINED
THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE UNIT,
o QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
OF APP, B TO 10CFR50 ARE MET.
EXH IBIT I I IC-21
lOCFR50 APP A,
PGS
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION P2, DESIGN BASES
FOR PROTECTION AGAINST NATURAL PHENOMENA
STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IMPORTANT
TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE
EFFECTS OF NATURAL PHENOMENA WITHOUT LOSS OF
CAPABILITY TO PERFORM THEIR SAFETY FUNCTIONS,
~ STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT IMPOR-
TANT TO SAFETY ARE DESIGNED TO
SEISMIC CATEGORY l REQUIREMENTS,
EXHIBIT IIIC-22
0
0
10CFR50 APP A,
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION P4,
ENVIRONf'1ENTAL AND MISSILE DESIGN BASES
STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS
IMPORTANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED
TO ACCOMMODATE THE EFFECTS- OF ENVIRON-
MENTAL CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED YlITH NORMAL
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, TESTING AND
POSTULATED ACCIDENTS INCLUDING LOSS
OF COOLANT ACCIDENTS.
IN AGREEMENT, Ifl ADDITION, THE
FOLLOWING DESIGf'3 FEATURES ARE
PROVIDED:
SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS OUTSIDE
CONTAINMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY ARE
PROVIDED WITH REDUNDANCY,
PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE HAS BEEN
PROVIDED FOR REDUNDANT EQUIPMEHT TO
PRECLUDE FAILURES IN ONE TRAIN FROM
ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE REDUNDANT
TRAIN,
EXHIBIT IIIC-23
S
V GS S 395
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹14
REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY
THE REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY SHALL
BE DESIGNED, FABRICATED, ERECTED, AND
TESTED SO AS TO HAVE AN EXTREMELY LOW
PROBABILITY OF ABNORMAL LEAKAGE, OF
RAPIDLY PROPAGATING FAILURE, AND OF
GROSS RUPTURE,
NOT APPLICABLE TO SEISMIC QUALIFICA-
TION OF BOP COMPONENTS,
EXHIBIT IIIC-24
6
GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹l5,REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM DESIGN
THE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED AUXILIARY,
CONTROL, AND PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
WITH SUFFICIENT MARGIN TO ASSURE THAT THE DESIGN
CONDITIONS OF THE REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY
ARE NOT EXCEEDED DURING ANY CONDITION OF NORMAL
OPERATION, INCLUDING ANTICIPATED OPERATIONAL
OCCURRENCES,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-25
l
8,
t
I I I, C,9 IEEE 344-1975
IEEE RECOf"ff'1EHDED PRACTICES FOR
SEISf"fIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS lE EQVIPNEf'kT FOR
rdUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS .
1) GENERAL
A, THE SEISNIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS 1E EQUIPNENT
SHOULD DENONSTRATE AN EQUIPMENT'S ABILITYTO
PERFORN ITS REQUIRED FUNCTION DURING AND AFTER
THE TINE IT IS SUBJECTED TO THE FORCES RESULTING
FRON ONE SSE, IN ADDITION, THE EQUIPNENT NUST
WITHSTAND THE EFFECTS OF A NUNBER OF OBES PRIOR
TO THE APPLICATION OF AN SSE AS FOLLOWS.
I'3 AGREEI"IENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-26
IEEE 344-1975
~ FOR QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS —.5 OBES
(UNLESS A LESSER SITE SPECIFIC VALUE
CAN BE JUSTIFIED)
IN AGREEMENT,
~ FOR QUALIFICATION BY TEST — 1 OR MORE
OBE TESTS THAT PRODUCE THE EQUIVALENT
EFFECT OF 5 OBES (UNLESS A LESSER SITE
SPECIFIC VALUE CAN BE JUSTIFIED)
IN AGREEMENT,
B, QUALIFICATION SHOULD BE BY ANALYSIS, TEST,
OR COMBINATION,
IN AGREEMENT,.
C, MARGINS SPECIFIED IN IEEE 323-1974 SHALL BE
EMPLOYED WHERE APPLICABLE,
IN AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT,IIIC-27
„
IEEE 344-1975
2) ANALYSIS
A, FOR STATIC ANALYSIS, THE RESPONSE OF THE
EQUIPMENT IS ASSUMED TO BE THE PEAK OF THE
RRS AT A CONSERVATIVE AND JUSTIFiABLE VALUE
OF DAMPING. THIS RESPONSE IS THEN MULTIPLIED
BY A STATIC COEFFICIENT OF 1,5,
IN AGREEMENT,
B, FOR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS, THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
MODELED TO REPRESENT MASS DISTRIBUTION AND
STIFFNESS CHARACTERISTICS, THIS MODEL IS USED
TO DETERMINE IF THE EQUIPMENT IS RIGID OR
FLEXIBLE, AND UPON THIS DETERMINATION DEPENDS
THE SUBSEQUENT ANALYTICALSTEPS, IF THE MODEL
HAS NO RESONANCES IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE BELOtt
THE HIGH-FREQUENCY ASYMPTOTE (ZPA) OF THE RRS IT
IS CONSIDERED RIGID AND ANALYZED STATICALIY,
EXHIBIT IIIC-28
IN AGREEMENT,
0
I EEE 344-1975
IF FLEXIBLE, THE NODEL CAN BE ANALYZED USING THE
RESPONSE SPECTRUN NODAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE OR A
TINE HISTORY ANALYSIS, THE RESPONSE OF INTEREST
IS DETERNINED BY CONBINING EACH NODAL RESPONSE
CONSIDERING ALL SIGNIFICANT NODES BY THE SQUARE
ROOT OF THE SUN OF THE SQUARES, THE ABSOLUTE
SUN OF SINILAR EFFECTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR
CLOSELY SPACED IN-PHASE NODES,
IN AGREENENT,
IN THE ANALYSIS, THE EFFECTS OF EACH OF THE TWO
f'lAJOR HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONS AND THE VERTICAL
DIRECTION SHOULD. BE CONSIDERED,
IN AGREENENT,
EXHI BIT I I IC-29
0
IEEE 344-1975
3) TESTING
A, SEISMIC TESTS SHOULD BE PERFORMED BY SUBJECTING
EQUIPMENT TO VIBRATORY MOTION MHICfl CONSERVA-
TIVELY SIMULATES Tl-lAT POSTULATED AT THE
EQUIPMENT MOUNTING DURING AN SSE. EQUIPMENT
SHOULD BE TESTED TO CONSERVATIVELY ACCOUNT FOR
MULTIDIRECTIONALEFFECTS OF THE EARTHQUAKE,
IN AGREEMENT,
8, THE EQUIPMENT TO BE TESTED SHALL BE MOUNTED ON
THE VIBRATION GENERATOR IN A MANNER THAT
SIMULATES THE INTENDED SERVICE MOUNTING,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-30
4
IEEE 304-1975
C. SUFFICIENT MONITORING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED TO
EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EQUIPMENT BEFORE,
DURING, AND AFTER TflE TEST. IN ADDITIOf'l, ENOUGH
VIBRATION MONITORING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED TO
ALLOW DETERMINATION OF THE APPLIED VIBRATION LEVELS,
IN AGREEMENT,
D. EXPLORATORY VIBRATION TESTS AID IN TtlE DETERMINING
OF TtjE TEST METHOD THAT HILL BEST QUALIFY OR
DETERMINE TIRE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
EQUIPMENT,
IN AGREEMENT,
E, SEISMIC QUALIFICATION TESTS ON CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE PERFORf'lED WITH THE EQUIPMENT SUBJECTED TO
fuORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS.
IN 'AGREEf'lENT,.
EXHIBIT IIIC-31
IEEE 544-1975
F, THE CHOICE BETWEEN SINGLE AND MULTI-FREQUENCY
TESTING SHALL BE MADE AS FOLLOWS:
~ WHEN THE SEISMIC GROUND MOTION HAS BEEN
FILTERED DUE TO ONE PREDOMINANT
STRUCTURAL MODE, A SHORT DURATION
STEADY-STATE VIBRATION CAN BE A CON-
SERVATIVE INPUT EXCITATION TO THE SHAKE
TABLE.
~ WHEN THE SEISMIC GROUND MOTION HAS NOT
BEEN STRONGLY F ILTERED, MULTI-FREQUENCY
TESTING IS APPLICABLE FOR QUALIFICATION,
~ IN AGREEMENT,
e IN AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT IIIC-52
0
0
IEEE 544-1975
G, SINGLE-AXIS TESTS ARE ALLOWED IF THE TESTS ARE
DESIGNED TO CONSERVATIVELY REFLECT THE SEISMIC
EVENT AT THE EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS OR
IF THE EQUIPMENT BEING TESTED CAN BE SHOWN TO
RESPOND INDEPENDENTLY IN EACH OF THE THREE
ORTHOGONAL AXES OR OTHERWISE WITHSTAND THE
SEISMIC EVENT AT ITS MOUNTING LOCATION. OTHER-
WISE, MULTIAXIS TESTING SHOULD BE USED, THE
MINIMUM IS BIAXIALTESTING WITH SIMULTANEOUS
INPUTS IN A PRINCIPAL HORIZONTAL AND THE
VERTICAL AXES,
'NAGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT I I IC-SS
IEEE 544-1975
4) COMBINED ANALYSIS AND TESTING
WHERE EQUIPMENT IS T00 LARGE OR COMPLEX OR NHERE
A NUMBER OF SIMILAR CONFIGURATIONS EXIST, A
COMBINATION OF ANALYSIS AND TEST MAY BE USED,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-54
i
III,.C,5 REGULATORY GUIDE 1,20
COMPREHENSIVE VIBRATION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
FOR REAC|OR INTERNALS DURING
l'REOPERATIONAL AND INITIALSTARTUP TESTING
V G
A COMPREHENSIVE VIBRATION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SHOULD
Bk. ESTABLISHED FOR IHE REACTOR INTERNALS,
NOT APPLICABLE TO SEISMIC
QUALIFICATION OF BOP
COMPONENTS,
EXHIBIT IIIC-55
0
REGULATORY GUIDE j.,48
DESIGN LIMITS AND LOADING COMBINATIONS FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I
FLUID SYSTEM COMPONENTS
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
THIS REGULATORY GUIDE SETS FORTH DESIGN LIMITS AND
LOADING COMBINATIONS FOR VARIOUS ASME SECTION IIICLASS 1, 2, AND 5 t;OMPONENTS,
LOADING. COMBINATIONS ARE
PRESENTED IN FSAR
CHAPTER S,9, DESIGN
LIMITS ARE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ASME SECTION I I I,
EXHIBIT IIIC-56
l
I(
REGULATORY GUIDE l,67
INSTALLATION OF OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION DEVICES
THIS GUIDE PROVIDES REQUIRENENTS FOR THE ANALYSIS
AND DESIGN OF PIPING FOR PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE
STATIONS,
NOT'APPLICABLE TO SEISNIC
QUALIFICATION OF
,EQUIPmENT.
EXHIBIT IIIC-37
j,
'jIj
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,68
INIr IAC TEST PROGRAMS FOR HATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
EACH APPLICANT OR LICENSEE SHOULD PREPARE AND
CONDUCT AN INITIALTEST PROGRAM TO DEMONSTRATE
THAT THE PLANT CAN BE OPERATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY. SUITABLE
TESTS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED TO VERIFY THF PERFORMANCE
CAPABILITIES OF SAFETY RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS,
AND COMPONENTS, .
NOT APPLICABLE FOR SEISMIC
QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-58
,
0
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,92
COMBINING MODAL RESPONSES
j.) COMBINATION OF MODAL RESPONSES
A, IN A RESPONSE SPECTRUM MODAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
WITHOUT CLOSELY SPACED MODES, TIIE MODAL
RES[ ONSES SHOULD BE COMBINED USING THE SQUARE
ROOT OF THE SUM QF THE SQUARES METHOD (SRSS).
IN AGREEMENT,
B, IN A RESPONSE SPECTRUM MODAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
WITH CLOSELY SPACED MODES, THE MODAL RESPONSES
SHOULD BE COMBINED USING ONE, OF THE FOLLOWING
NETHODS: GROUPING METHOD, TEN PERCENT METHOD,
OR DOUBLE SUM METHOD.
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-39
R,G, 1,92
2) COMBINATION OF EFFECTS DUE TO THREE SPATIAL
COMPONENTS OF AN EARlHQUAKE
A. IN A RESPONSE SPECIRA METHOD, THE RESPONSES TO
tACH OF THE THREE COMPONENTS OF EARTHQUAKE
MOTION SHOULD BE COMBINED BY TAKING fHE SQUARE
ROOT OF THE SUM OF THE SQUARES METHOD,
IN AGREEMENT,
B, IN A TIME-HISTORY ANAI YSIS HHEN THE RESPONSES
DUE TO EACH OF THE THREE COMPONENTS OF EARTH-
QUAKE MOTION ARE CALCULATED SEPARATELY, THE
RESPONSES SHOULD,BE COMBINED BY TAKING THE
SQUARE ROOT OF THE SUM OF THE SQUARES METHOD,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-40
0
1
R.G, 1,92
C. IN A TIME-HISTORY ANALYSIS WHEN THE RESPONSES
FROM EACH OF THE THREE COMPONENTS OF THE
EARTHQUAKE MOTION ARE CALCULATED BY THE
STEP-BY-STEP METHOD AND COMBINED ALGEBRAICALLY
AT EACH TIME STEP, THE MAXIMUM RESPONSE CAN BE
OBTAINED FROM THE COMBINED TIME SOLUTION.
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-01
0
0
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,100
SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRIC
EQUIPMENT FOR NUCLEAR POHER PLANTS
USE OF IEEE STD 344-1975 FOR CONDUCTING SEISMIC QUALIFICATION
OF CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT, IN CONJUNCTION MITH REGULATORY
GUIDE 1,89, PROVIDES AN ADEQUATE BASIS FOR COMPLYING WITH
DESIGN VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF
ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
4
1, THE USE OF 1,5 AS THE STATIC COEFFICIENT IS
ACCEPTABLE FOR VERIFYING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF
FRAME-TYPE STRUCTURES, FOR EQUIPMENT HAVING
CONFIGURATIONS OTHER THAN A FRAME-TYPE STRUCTURE,
JUSTIFICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR USE OF A
STATIC COEFFICIENT,
IN 'AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT IIIC-42
0
R,G, 1,100
. ~
2, IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE TRS CLOSELY ENVELOP THE
APPLICABLE PORTION OF THE RRS TO VERIFY THE
ADEQUACY OF TEST INPUT MOTION,
IN AGREEMENT
IN THE ABSENCE OF JUSTIFICATION, THOSE PORTIONS OF
SECTION 6,6.2,5, "SINE SWEEP TEST," WHICH INDICATE
THAT, FOR QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT USING THE SINE SWEEP
TEST INPUT, THE TRS MUST ENVELOP THE RRS ACCORDING
IO THE CRITERIA DESCRIBED IN SECTIONS 6,6,2 AND 6,6,2;1
SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE,
IN AGREEMENT,
EXHIBIT I I IC-45
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,124
SERVICE LIHITS AND LOADING CGPlBINATIOfjS
FOR CLASS 1 LINEAR-TYPE CONPONEHI SUPPORTS
THE GUIDE REQUIRES CONPLIANCE MITH SUBSECTION NF OF SECTION IIIOF ASNE BRPV CODE AS NODIFIED NITHIN THE GUIDE FOR DIFFERENT
STRESS AND LOAD VALUES,
IN AGREEf'1ENT,
EXHIBIT IIIC-44
REGULATORY GUIDE 1,130
SERVICE LIMITS AND LOADING COMBINATIONS
FOR CLASS 1 PLATE-AND-SHELL-TYPE COMPONENT SUPPORTS
THIS GUIDE DELINEATES ACCEPTABI E LEVELS OF SERVICE
LIMITS AND APPROPRIATE COMBINATIONS OF LOADINGS
ASSOCIATED WITH NORMAL OPERATION, POSTULATED
AC.CIDENTS, AND SPEC'IFIED SEISMIC EVENTS FOR THE
DESIGN OF CLASS 1 PLATE-AND-SHELL-TYPE COMPONENT
SUPPORTS AS DEFINED IN SUBSECTION NF OF SECTION IIIOF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
(ASME) BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE.,
NOT APPLICABLE SINCE THERE
ARE NO CLASS 1 PLATE,-'AND-
'SHELL SUPPORTS FOR BOP
COMPONENTS,
EXHIBIT IIIC-45
0
APS/BECHTEL EQUIPMENTSUPPLIER
DESIGNC RITE RI'A
SPEC IF I CATI 0 NS
INSPECTION/HOLD/WITNESS PLAN
SUPPLIERDESIGN ANDMANUFACTURING
QUA LIF ICAT I 0 N
TEAMREVIEW
QUALIFICATIONPLANS/PRO CEO URES
QUAL IF ICATIONAUDIT OFTESTING TESTING'NALYSIS
QUAL IF I CATIONTEAMREVIEW
SUPPLIERQU AL IF I CATI 0 N
REPORT
FSAR DATASUMMARY
PVNGS SITERECORDS
QUALIFICATI0NDOCUMENTATION
I
~EQUIPMENT QUAI.IFICATION PROCESS
FIGURE 7 .
e
PURPOSE
e COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN CRITERIA
COMPLIANCE WITH QUALITY REGULATIONS, CODES AND STANDARDS
~ COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS
EXHIBIT IV-j.
0
SPECIFICATION
INSPECTION/HOLD/WITNESS PLAN
a INPLENENT DESIGN CRITERIA
e ESTABLISHNENT OF HOLD AND TEST POINTS
o REYIEH BY RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER AND SPECIALISTS AS REQUIRED
~ RESIDENT/PERIODIC INSPECTION
EXHIBIT IV-2
SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION PLANS/PROCEDURES
~ DESCRIPTION OF QUALIFICATION METHODS
TESTING
ANAI YS IS
OPERATING EXPERIENCE
ONGOING QUALIFICATION
COMBINATION OF METHODS
DESCRIPTION OF QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES
EXHIBIT IV-5
f
it
QUALIFICATION TEAM REVIEW
~ PLANS AND PROCEDURE
APS CHECKLIST
BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST
BECHTEL SEISMIC CHECK LIST
SPECIALISTS REVIEW AS REQUIRED
UPGRADING TO NUREG 0588
~ QUALIFICATION REPORTS
APS REYIE'W
BECHTEL RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER AND SPECIALIST
REVIEW AS REQUIRED
REVIEW OF DOCUMENTATION
FSAR AMENDMENT
COMPLIANCE TO NUREG 0588
EXHIBIT IV-0
0
SUPPLIERSU 8MITTAL
QUALIFI CATION'REVIEWTEAM
BECHTEL APS
SEISMICREVIEWERS
ENVIRONMENTALREVIEWERS
NUCLEARSERVICESREVIEWGROUP
STRESSREVIEWERS(AS REQ'D)
RfSPONSIBLE ENGINEER
COMMENT COORDINATION
COMMENTR ESO LUTI0N
NOTACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
RECORDSRETENTION
QUALIFICATIONINFORMATION REVIEW
QUALIFICATIONTEAM REVIEWFIGURE 18
8'
APS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SEISMIC CHECK LIST
I, GENERAL
DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT
APPLICABLE SPEC IF I CAT ION APPENDIX
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS
LIFE LIMITING COMPONENTS
I I, IEEE 323-1974. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION METHOD
IDENTIFICATION OF METHOD AND EXCEPTIONS
III, IEEE-344-1975 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION METHOD
IDENTIFICATION OF METHOD AND DESCRIPTIONS
IV SPECIAL MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE
V IEEE-323-1974 TYPE TEST PROGRAM/PLAN
DESCRIPTION, PROCEDURE, TEST PLAN, REQUIREMENTS, PERFORMANCE LIMITS, FAILURE
DEF IN IT ION, DOCUMENTATION
vi IEEE-323-1974 OPERATING EXPERIENCE PROGRAM/PLAN
IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC FEATURES TO BE DEMONST>ATED, PAST HISTORY OF
PERFORMANCE AND SERVICE CONDITIONS, ENVELOPE FOR OPERATING EXPERIENCE
INCLUDES EQUIPMENT TO BE QUALIFIED,
EXHIBIT IV-510-09-80
f
0
VII IEEE-525-1974 ANALYSIS TEST PROGRAM/PLAN
ASSUMPTIONS, EMPIRICALLY DERIVED VALUES, MATHEMATICALMODELS AND JUSTIFICATIONS
DESCRIPTION OF METHODS
BASIS FOR EXTRAPOLATION
FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS IDENTIFICATION
V I I I IEEE-525-1970 ON-GOING QUALIFICATION PROGRAM/PLAN
EXHIBIT IV-5A10-09-80
0
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (BECHTEL)
GENERAL
DESCRIPTION R LOCATION OF. COMPONENT
OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS
DESIGNATOR, DBA, TIME, OPERATION, FUNCTION
DESIGNATED ENVIRONMENT
FROM FSAR
QUALIFIED ENVIRONMENT
FROM SUPPLIER
MARGIN
FROM SUPPLIER
EQUIPMENT MOUNTING AND ORIENTATION
EXHIBIT IV-6
I
~
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (BECHTEL) (CONTINUED)
VII. QUALIFICATION METHOD
TYPE, SEQUENCE, SPECIMEN, INSTRUMENTATION, AGING METHOD, HUMIDITY AGING,
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC MONITORING, INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION, COMPONENT
INTERFACES,
V I I I, EVALUATION
IX. DEFICIENCIES
EXHIBIT IV-7
,
0
EXHIBIT 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER
COIITIO( ÃSIQ OASIS ACCIKÃT(ACES 40 TEAR IRIE6RATEO)
PKSSO(E(PSI6)
KIATIYEIRRII0 ITT(5)
RAOIATIOI(R405)(10 TEAR
IRTESRAIEO
l05E)
OUI)CALS
EXHIBIT 2
QUALIFICATION MARGIN
CÃIITIOI
PRANKSTER
TOPE RATORE
(P)
P%55VRE
(PSI6)
RELATIVE
I(PI I 0 IT T
(6)
RAOIATIOt(RAOS)
(40 TEAR
IRTE6RATEO
OOSE)
06(I(ALS
KSI6R IASIS ACCICOIT
(IRCLIIKS 40 TEAR IRTE6RATEO)
EXHIBIT IV-8
SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (BECHTEL)
I, COMPONENT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
I I, EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHOD
III, VIBRATION INPUT
LOADS, RESPONSE SPECTRA, REQUIRED ACCELERATION
IV, QUALIFICATION TEST DATA
FREQUENCY, AXIS, NO, OF TESTS, FREQUENCY RANGE, TRS, LAB MOUNTING, VERIFICATION OF
FUNCTIONAL OPERABILITY, TEST RESULTS,
V, ANALYSIS TEST DATAl
METHOD MODEL TYPE, COMPUTER CODES, COMBINATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSES, DAMPING,
SUPPORT CONSIDERATIONS, CRITICAL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS.
VI, DEFICIENCIES
EXH IBIT IV-9
i
0
SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION TEST I NG/ANALYSIS
o TESTING
ACTUAL EQUIPMENT OR PROTOTYPE
LAB PROCEDURES
SEQUENCE — ENVIRONMENTAL, SEISMIC, LOCA
SCHEDULE
o ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTION OF METHOD
o DESCRIPTION OF OTHER METHODS
OPERATING EXPERIENCE
ONGOING QUALIFICATION
COMBINATION OF METHODS
EXHIBIT IV-10
AUDIT OF TESTING
~ CONDUCTED BY SUPPLIER QUALITY REPRESENTATIVE (SQR)
~ REVIEW TEST PROCEDURES, PLANS AND REPORTS FOR COMPLIANCE
W ITH SPECIFICATION
e REVIEW REPORT DATA
e REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING TESTS, COLLECTING AND
REDUCING DATA
~ VERIFY CAPABILITY OF TEST EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION
TO'ERFORM TESTS
~ VERIFY INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION TRACEABLE TO NBS
e VERIFY TEST PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURES AND
DEVIATIONS NOTED
~ VERIFY EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER
TEST
~ VERIFY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS REFLECT TEST DATA
o EXAMINE INTERNAL REVIEW PROCESS, SIGN OFF PROCEDURES
AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
~ VERIFY EXISTENCE OF "AGING LIBRARY" OR "EXTENSIVE
LITERATURE DATA BANK." IF REFERENCED,
EXHIBIT IV-11
1
~
0
SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION DOCUNENTATION
o BECHTEL LOG NO„REPORT NO, AND SUBJECT TITLESTATUS j.
o PROPRIETARY INFORNATION
'SUBJECT
LOCATION
EXHIBIT V-j.
i
0
SITE RECORDS
o COMPLETENESS OF RECORDS
o REFERENCE TO LOCATION OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
EXHIBIT V-2
FSAR DATA SUMMARY
o TYPE OF EQUIPMENT (COMPONENT)
o EQU IPMENT LOCATION
o BUILDING
o ELEVATION
o MANUFACTURER
o MODEL NUMBER
o PVNGS SPECIFICATION NUMBER
o ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR
o QUALIFICATION METHODS
o QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENT
o TIME BASE
o SEISMIC QUALIFICATION
o QUALIFICATION METHOD
o EXCITATION METHOD
o FREQUENCY RANGE (HZ)
o OPERABILITY
o . TIME WHEN REQUIRED
o DEMONSTRATED
EXHIBIT V-3
,
o ACCURACY
o REQUIRED
o DEMONSTRATED
o ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT/REVISION NUMBER
o QUALIFICATION LIFE (YEARS)
EXHIBIT V-0
f
I /I
CHECK LIST
ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION
I General
This checklists is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met.- Completeone checklist sheet for IE components. Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.
Type ofEquipmentComponent
EquipmentLocation
Bldg. Elev. ManufacturerModelNumber
PVNGSSpec.
P VNGS
TagNumbers
ho~ ex~~~ colum ~ iso'eNeaatATa hah L
f~ jSQA~ COQ~ -+AS -4045
Additional Information
Environ«mental
Designator
DesignBasis
Accident
Time WhenReq'd T 0
9 Initiationof DBA
Natureof
OperationEquipment Function
Lo CA
+',/LB0-30 hh lM. <Pal Ir4zegp
B4F AC3 u.at.ioQLo hO
PE'gvEN C.l N +
Additional Information
III Desi nated Environment
Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization
EXHIBIT VI-1
0
Page -2-
IV uglified Environment
Complete exhibit 1 ~ Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?
I
Q Yes — Proceed to item VNo — Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences will
impair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)
HAD jWT'ioN EFFE'cd N oT CoH SIQEAE'0
Qxc Ea vi~~
V ~Mar in
Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if. any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements- Are marginsacceptable?
0 Yes — Proceed to item VI e
Q No - Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences aresignificant
Q Significant P) Not Significant
Justification: AM EFFEC L C 6PT RADIAT<6N
(5es <ram M Hp Vt. ulcc,c iW
EXHIBIT VI-2
Page -3-
VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientationh
1) Was .equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc.)? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~
g Horizontal (egeg floor)Q Vertical (egeg wall)Q Canted at degrees fram vertical (eg., piping)
No orientation requirementOther — Clarify
2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. )
Was test mount same as intended site installation?
Q Yes — Proceed to item VIIQ Nn - Explain
A. Identify qualification method:
g Type Test - Report 8 F Il5
Q Analysis - Report 8
Q Operating Experience Report //
Q OnWoing Qualification - Report P
Q Combination of Methods (check all that apply)
B. Describe qualification method- What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.
Zero 323- t>7q ~pe. res(
EXHIBIT VI-3
Page -4-
C. Were tests conducted in the folloving sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.
1. Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3.'peration (extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic6. DBA Operation7. Post DBA Operation8. Inspeection
Was actual test sequence
s
Q Yes Proceed to DK,,„„„,„~rsc fAP g(flu a4'7" A+PLJEP l~ Sl El 5C 4AJP 7 >T+Cg HJI5E IP E'WIT(d4i
equal to or more sever than this sequence?
Q Yes - ExplainP Nc - Equipment is not qualified
D. Provide additional test data as noted:
1) ieisnic testing consisted of ~~ OBE s bet'reo/ d neo~oSSEs'singthe required response spectra/required input motion noted in PSAR
Section 3 7.l- I-
2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:
8 Yes - Proceed to 3
P No - Explain:
3) Test temperatures vere measured by
Q Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4
g Other - Explain and Justify UdAd DEC C'EVIEAJ
4) Heat aging ves conducted by
Q Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5
P Other - Explain and Justify E~l <R.ATd88 C.VZLIWG,.
Jl P/lb'/7 4)AS 7 EWE EC'ATTIRE O'Yd~> /gyT/uE5 +5 gRpoF
ns td'ctoss' $0~~Crsis FRo vinzS c40 Pp+ OC I + ~++Qg~ ~p~~pgg+7+g)+id co~a irrn~~uc fdrcueESQ
EXHIBIT VI-4
0
0"
fIf
Page -5-
5) Humidity aging'as conducted by:
6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?
C3 Yes - Proceed to 7
a)No — Justify: 'Ehl- 6N t
7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored were:
Pe%. Lo |c- 6 RwY'ice
8) The performance characteristics monitored were:
PkoPeR Lo + < c- oPe~~i orq
9) Performance characteristics during testing were monitored
5g ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at intervalsg Not applicable - Justify:
~V Nuou 'b u.iN GEE'i AND hS E H AseuNe
AnJD GX~mP EPOCH ~D AF~w ACr(M+
10) Does test report identify that instrumentation was in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?
Rj Yes - Proceed to llQ No - Justify:
EXHIBIT VI-5
0
Page -6-
11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc-) simulate installed condition?
g Yes — Proceed to VIIIQ No — Justify:
VIII Evaluation
Qualified lifetime is:
40 yearsOther - Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):
Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:
BechtelLog No.
ReportNo Subject
Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of report)
Ytog —So
Clod -'786'-tl5-7'-
t l5-709
PE'tP&t C.
Gatv I kOH-%FAT'AL
Evalua tion Approval:
Reviewing Engineer:
Group Supervisor:
EXHIBIT VI-6
EXHIBIT 1
ENVIR'OhMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER
~III%
TE)PENT)DEe)
i%SINEesl6)
%1ATITEAID ITTIS)
ILIA)I(%INAOS)
t10 TEAA
INESNATGIR50
06IIEAIS
+o -/ov/rm a5
%SIN 0NS IS KEITENT
t)KIDDO 00 TEAN IDIE6NATED)
ZucA +5~9+o-r~w
4'ism
Og
EXHIBIT 2QUALIFICATIOh'ARGIN
CXIITIOI
TE)DE NATONAL
IT)
I%SQlfesto
%LATIVENRIDITTIS)
DADIATII))INAOS)
Il0 TEAN
IÃTESNATG)
00SE)
r +~+
/0 >'+9~
0
KSI60 IASIS K(IDENIIKUm N0 TEAN INTE6AATED)
/ neh m 5~cP
+ 2Q
Io r 0+$
EXHIBIT VI-7
ualif ication Summar of E ui ment
I. Plant Name: Pl/A/6'6 l I Pg
). Utility:Type:
2. NSSS: C'. A/E: Bechtel B4'R
I I . Com onent Name: agP A@I+)N<ggEP <ABET'} FEAVVEM ACTAA7IN/SYS7EW
I. Scope: [ ) NSSS [ pf BOp
Pa2. Numbe r: ELE~~OO47 Quant ity:
ELQ4HW
3. Vendor: LECT S D
If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included: L 0~« ~~~R'-<g ANnlua'CIAT& RELAY AG7uAT>oh( f8'Physical Description a. Appearance
jl II I/b. Dimeasions~O DE
c. Veight
6. Location: Building:
Elevation:
Field Mounting Conditions [ ) Bolt (No. , Size
)
8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
I I
9. a. Functional Description: Eb. Is the equipment required for [ ) Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdown
[Vf Both
10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: -ir 8(ne wo)
EXHIBIT YI-8
III. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in tbe plant: [ p[ Y
IV. E ui ment uali fxcation Method: Test:
Analysis:
Combination of Test and Anal'>'sis:
Test and/or Analysis by LE L 0 0(Name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.)
V. Vibration In ut:
1. Loads considered: l. [4 Seismic only 2. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
3. f ) Explosive only 4. [ ) Ot.her (Specify)
5. [ ) Combination of
6. Method of combining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS [ ](other, specify.i
2. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
3. Required Accelerat.ion in Each Direction:/58 s~ I,g~~z~t S/S =,0 OSE F/B =~, 47
VI. If uglification b'est then Com lete:
I,5g ssco86
l. [ ) Single Frequency
2. f ] Single Axis
[ ~random[v(Multi-Frequency: [ ) sine beat
f )
f ~Multi-Axis
3. No. oi Qualiiication Tests: OSE [3 SEE~Other(specify)
4. Frequency Range: F 0 g Z o ZS4ZTRS enveloping RRS using Mluti-ireq uecny Test [b[iyes [plot TRS on RRS graphs)
f ) No
EXHIBIT VI-9
N
g.09 ops ZOg08~ 2'0 o8EJAN~ z,~ mE'. Input tt-level Test at S/S = F/B = '
V .= Z~f SSd
7. Laboratory Mounting: L a 3 E Ez =%2 /Jacks
l. [ ) Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ )
6. Functional operability verified: [Q Yes [ ) No [ ] Not Applicable
!('. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including resultsj:
Vi!. If ualxficataon bv Ana'is or b "the Combination of Test and Analysis ther.
C~nm let.e
l. Description of Test including Results:
.'!echo" cf Analysis
Static Analysis) Dynamic Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysxs[ ] Time-History[ ) Response Spectrum
3- Rode! Taupe: [ ) 3D f ) 2D
) Finite Element [ ) Bean
[)lD[ ) Closed Form Solution
[ ] Computer Codes:a
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:
] Hand Calculations
."method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS
] Other:(specify)
6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerations in the model:
EXHIBIT VI-10
4
0
BOP
8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Loador Response
A. Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress
To talStress
StressAllowable
B. Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional
0 erabilit
VIII. uglification Deficiencies
The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:
Work orders written:
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer 7 ~ l4<< +6
Group Supervisor
EXHIBIT YI-11
0.09.08.07.06.0
5.0
4.0
I'
E: ~:.:I'
~ ~
~ ~ I
".:.I i'.i~ '.'
P ~
I. MI
3.0
2.0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I ~ i
ZPA ~ 1.6 0
1.0Ec 0.9
0.8 .tAA4J 0.7
rL: I
t"--"-'-IF—=—4==.-E=i -''1=-IE-'I'-
0.5
0.4
~ ~ -I=L'.3
0.2~ - I ~
~ PI
I ~
0.12 3 4 5 6 78910
FRElgENCY (HZ)
20 30 40 50 60 100
NOTES: I, OAIIPINC 3~+
2. APPLICABLE TO BOTH HORIZONTAL ANO VERTICAL DIRECTIONS
Fig, 4. Required response spectrum for SSE
II GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY
SIZE CODE IDENT. NO. DWD. NO.
A 32334SCALE' EV.
ELA 342-'0061
SHEET 8 of 23
Bo-ifORhl OAIOZeA-2
BH IBIT YI-12
7.06.0
5.0
4.0
~ .'
( I
I I
~ ~
i ~
I ~
I !I I i
3.0
2.0
1.0,0.90.8 '.
0 7
0 ~ 6
0.5
0.4
~ id I I, i i
~ ~
0.3
0.2
0.12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 100
FREQUENCY (HZ)
NOTES: I. DAMP.ING 2>2 ~ APPLICABLE TO BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIRECTIONS
Fig. 3. Required response spectrum for OBE
Og GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANYWa ee Co me~
ISCALE RE Y. B SHEET
FORM OAIO24A-2
Sl?E COOK lOEHT. HO. OWO. HO.
3 9 3 3 4 ELA 342-0061
0
CHECK LIST
ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION
I General
This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components. Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.
Type ofEquipmentComponent Bldg. Elev.
EquipmentLocation
ManufacturerModelNumber
PVNGS
Spec.
PVNGS
TagNumbers
~c.a/ Mc<-QoliN'ttD
QQLlfo
r
Q-Rp,-eQ,A,Q+gg -cOWP
Additional Information + WC4 NU~l SFR. ~ MOME-ES A4E LLS~D OP4
hl7hC.RED <6Rl-I P I C AR oH
Environ-mental
Designator
DesignBasis
Acc'dent
Time WhenReq'd T 09 Initiation
of DBA
Natureof
OperationEquipment Function
8'5T l REDbh CON~N W6~
P~ ~~ A0N ll 0RdN+~b CgN~L
Additional Information
III Desi nated Environment
Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization
EXHIBIT VI-14
,
Page -2-
IV uglified Environment
Complete exhibit 1. Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier.'s qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?
Q Yes —Proceed to item V
Q No - Describe the differences'ndicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)
R.aDi~YloN ez u OetZ. kEvi ~u.~ <O LE4eLS COnlSiD~~D H < H H~~io iT
Ghl 4 Y Hi~ gu~ i Di7 >g Wo~ P4~4<~W4
THAN L~~ .
V ~Mar ia
Identify margins,.if any, pro'ded by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to,IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?
C3 Yes — Proceed to item VIQ No — Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences are
significant
Q Significant
Justif ication: KM 1 >g Not Significant
1T VAC<V i SO Al ~ 9<0~ RH
~C l P~ 04 NPt. ~N 5 i
EXHIBIT VI-15
I
Page -3-
VI E ui nent Mountin and Orientation
1) Was equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc )? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible).
IZ Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg., wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg., piping)
No orientation, requirementOther — Clarify
2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc-)
Was test mount same as intended site installation?
0 Yes — Proceed to item VIIQ Nn — Explain So <~a - AgA<Ys<s
Wv.Sr<pi~S A~ rAei Li
VII uglification Method
A. Identify qualification method:
gg Type Test — Report 8 Q<AASll l5 Ig t 19 ~ Z7>M>33 3>f'j
V 8,88~ Co J ham a,c AAA LeQ Analysis - Report 0 A AOS G& Q,+AWSO'i t QO94
Q Operating Experience Report 8
Q On-Going Qualification — Report /!
g Combination of Methods (check all that apply)
B. Describe qualification method. What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.
tNObu<P A. Gab t ieiC.Mian U.Sih ATuMLLAWD (W > 4AC 6 Du. Le4 AN C~P.RENr-
Lo Dg c. l o &obu L.G
EXHIBIT VI-16
Page -4-
C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.
1. Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3. Operation (extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic6. DBA Operation7. Post DSA Operation8. Inspeection
g Yes — Proceed to D
Q No - Explain test sequence
Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?
Q Yes - ExplainQ No — Equipment is not qualified
D. Provide additional test data as noted:
I) Seismic testing consisted of 5 ORE's before/after ~ SSE'susing the required response spectra/ noted inFEAR Section B~7I.
2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment: „
l3 Yes - Proceed to 3 lsNo — Explain: . PN AL'/>lb ~< 5 iM i LAR." gP~~
3) Test temperatures were measured by
0 Direct Mounted Thermocouple — Proceed to 4
Q Other — Explain and Justify @NOD~ kE'llP~
4) Heat aging was conducted by
Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5Other - Explain and Justify iVATc444c. A6-ih(
QHIBIT YI-17
R
0
Page -5-
5) Humidi'ty aging,was conducted by: NA >RML. A IN
6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?
C3 Yes — Proceed to 7
g No — Justify: Na RAD1WT')@hi BXPOSQkE
7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored vere:
6<vpu.r SH'ww
8) The performance characteristics monitored vere:
84>'Pu.l- SA i P T
9) Performance characteristics during testing vere monitored
Q Continuously l0tLklH AQ Intermittently at intervalsD Not applicable — Justify:
10) Does test report identify that instrumentation vas in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?
D Yes — Proceed to llQ No - Justify: i+~EK Re'Vl~
EXHIBIT VI-18
01
Page -6-
ll) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc-) simulate installed condition?
H Yes — Proceed to VIIIQ ho — Justify:
VIII Evaluation
Qualified lifetime is:
40 yearsOther - Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s): FATS V~~~
5t= M~lvhcD To I O yehrz.S By Wlvh<Ys <S
Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:
BechtelLog No.
ReportNo Subject
Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of report)
WLLi-L l5 ENV L Loh)&NIALSgl SWLLC
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer:
Group Supervisor:
EXHIBIT YI-19
S
I
EXHIBIT 1
ENVIRONHENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER
CONITIOI
TE)PEAATIOE(F)
l%SSNE(lS!6)
KUTIYEIl)II0 (IT(S)
RNIATIOI(AAOS)
W) TEAA
IlIESAATEOlOSE)
RN%JAOKAW.
+O-/o+
KSI(N OASIS KCIOEAT(IKUICES AO TEAA IIITESAATEO)
@ISO(-"A m 5C++'n -ioy
47 WAS
AJAVQ
EXHIBIT 2
QUALIFICATION MARGIN
(NO ITIOI
tMhlEKA
TE)PEAATINE(f)
l%SSOAEPSI6)
KIATIVEIl)II0 ITT(S)
AAOIATI(W(AAOS)
(AO TEAR
IIITE6AATEO
OOSE)
-'3o~ +Co
(PiuE) + 4$
'ESIN OASIS KCIOEIIT
(IKUNES AO TEAA IAIESAATEO)
r i'W5z+4
G'vow
i +IS
EXHIBIT VI-20
1
ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REPORT - ENVIRONMENTAL
1. Purchase Order Number 10407 13-JM-ill.
2. Arizona Public, Service Company - Palo Verde Nuclear GeneratingStation Units 1, 2 and 3.
3. Safety related rack mounted devices supplied by Foxboro:
Device alification Re ort Rev. W//I—
2AC-M32AI-Z2V2AI-I3V2AZ-T2V
'AO-L2C-R
2AO-VAZ ECEP 92062AO-V3I2AP+ALM-AR2AP+ALM-AS2AP+SQE2ARPS-A62ANU-D2AX+DZO2AX+DP102AX+DS12AX+VE2AX+AM
QOAAA05QOAAB35QOAAB13QOAAB28QOAAB60QOAAB44QOAAB11QOAAB33QOAAB19QOAAB48QOAAB25QOAAB58QOAAA05QOAAB14QOAAB18QOAAA05QOAAB27
5. Test plans, specifications and objectives are containedand QOAAA02.
6. Test results are contained in the Qualification Reports
4.. Equipment performance specifications are defined in theReports (See Ztem 3).
Qualification
F$'/8
B 9aA 9'9A //7A /OJB 92,A /00A gdB lo&A 9'7
A /OQA '88BBA 88A yy %.
'~ >
in QOAAA01
(See Itexr 3).
7. Supporting data are contained in QOAAB01. (To be submitted)
8. Analysis data are contained in QOAAA05 and QOAAA06. -zz/-z
9. P rril'r4.APPROVED DATE
pl~~ i(g OF I,;~4»
C. »»»I
CHl!.OS
g Ni» 2GG73 o /j~'o "'C, @~i'".F
tvrNiEXHIBIT VI-21
ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REPORT - SEISMIC
Purchase Order Number 10407 13-JM-ill;
Arizona Public Service Company - Palo Verde Nuclear GeneratingStation Units 1, 2 and 3.
Safety-related rack-mounted devices supplied by Foxboro:
Device alification Re rt, Rev.
2AC-M32AI-Z2V2AI-Z3V2AI-T2V2AO-L2C-R2AO-VAI ECEP 92062AO-V3I2AP+ALM-AR2AP+ALM-AS2AP+SQE2 ARPS-A62ANU-D2AX+DZO2AX+DP102AX+DS12AX+VE2AX+AM2ES-BXXX RackVeldable Base
Devices cualified by type
QOAAA05QOAAB35QOAAB13QOAAB28QOAAB60QOAAB44QOAABllQOAAB33QOAAB19QOAAB48QOAAB25QOAAB58QOAAA05QOAAB14QOAAB18QOAAA05QOAAB27QOAAA20 PlActon Report 14096
similarity to tested
AABAAABAABAAABBAAA0
devices:
wP//Ptp 39'9
//7/o//OOO'Cp
/0297
/o3ge
Ps88588$
~ //a
Similar Device'ested Device ification Re rt2AX+DZO2AX+VE2AC-M3
2AX+DS12AX+P2AC-M2
QOAAB18QOAAB21QOAAB27
Rev. BRev. BRev. A
v5/$ 0
Rp
Test response spectra, acceptance criteria, and test results forQ-Class (Seismic Class 1) devices are contained in the individualtype test reports and in QOAAA20, Parts 1 and 2. Test response -F'~/ -Vjspectra, acceptance criteria, and test results for R-Class (SeismicClass 9) devices are contained in QOAAA20, Part 1. The model -F52AO-L2C-R experienced contact chatter at the Foxboro generic SSFresponse spectra but did not chatter at the generic OBE responsespectra which exceed the project SSE floor response spectra forelevation 140 feet. See SDDR No. 1902, attached.
EXHIBIT VI-22
6. Test response spectra are contained in QOAAA20 and Qualification -Z'5 i~->0Reports.
. 7. Devices are to mounted in Model N-2ES racks or as shown ondimensional dravings.
8. Device specifications and physical properties are contained inQOAAA05 and Qualification Reports.
9. Test facility:
10.
Acton Environmental Testing CorporationActon, Massachusetts
Test equipment information is contained in QOAAA20 and Qualifies- -PS/- h'0tion Reports.
~ ]'I, Test method is described in QOAAA04.
Test data are contained in QOAAA20.
-aj~-iW
pg r'PP
13. Test results are contained in QOAAA20 and Qualification Reports.
14. Identification of the device features that vere qualified bygeneric tests and justification and certification of similarityto the tested devices are contained in QOAAA05.
15. Approved:
~<as OF i+r+i;cP CgC~
ZOSEPHg/ wC.
CHILDS.,~ IIO. 2u673 O
i
jiiwm'ate
EXHIBIT VI-23
ualification Sumnar of E ui ment
' I. plane liame: PpN g 5 ( Z eI. 3l. Utility: AP I %DNA, PUB L IC SERVIC 6
Type:
PWR X
NSSS: C E 3. A/E: Bechtel BUR
11. Com onent Name: BC' N LO (NS'TRUDGENP- %ZA - co z. A
%ZA COdaNo o'-s - co
Scope: [ ] NSSS [vJ BOP
2. Hadal Number: 2 E5-B Quantity: ~darNtT
3. Vendor: THE Fc )C BQ RO CON PAW
4. 1f the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included: SEE A PEND(
5. Physical Description a. Appearance MALo (nl T'g CA& WENT
a ~
b. Dimensions 32. w' 3' D X t I 8 H
c. 't eight [ 0 Sc> ~
6. Location: Bui lding: Co+TR o L.
Elevation: (4.o -0
Field Mounting Conditions [ g Bolt (No. >, Size /a Zo ) To BAspBoLTBD 'T> wet'Ass [ Q Veld (Length I 8" )WaLDeD To >LooR [ ]
8. Natural Frequencies, in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
S/S: F/B: i3 iC V: (~,S
9. a. Functional Description: S~wcTt'aLATaP GONTINLJoUS PRoCB'55 MoglloC(~
b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[X] Both
10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 3 3'itA WAIT(~g F INAL GUALIFt CATION D>C AMKQT
EXHIBIT VI-24
'
l]1. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: [M) Ye;
I'V. E ui ment ualafxcation Method: Test:
Ko
Analysis:
Combination of Test. and Analysis:
V. Vibration In ut
Test and/or Analysis by AC o Vl os ~ A aS rN ~RP.(Name of Company or Laborat.ory 6 Report No. )
T~sr ma
pohcy
0 I+~2, 2A HALT's r 5 R6poRY W I 4 o g Q
l. Loads considered: I [X) Seismic only 2. [ ) Hydrodynamic only
3. [ ) Explosive only 4. [ ) Other (Specify)
5. [ ) Combination of
6. Method of combining RRS: [ ) Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS [ )(other, specifv)
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): SEr 4 r aaDrx'r
3. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: + F'A, 5 sE
S/S =~ S g
VI. If ua'.ifacation b 'est then Com lete:
l. [ ) Single Frequencyg] random
[X) Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat.)
2. [ ) Single Axis [g) Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other(specify)
4. Frequency Range: ).2,5 — Ioo IIa.
5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) }'es (plot TRS on RRS graphs)[g No r art<sr.y'z I 4 2.g H~.
AWAr r(aC7 FrnlAL Q tARr-r r=r cP'TroN >ocular+
EXHIBIT VI-25
0
e. 1aPvt S-level Test at S/S = RR& F/B = RRS V = PRsa
7. Lahnra tory Mounting: 0 LTED Vv'(THouT )MELD Ches&
1. [2) Bol t (No. Q, Size i2 ) [ ] Meld (Length ) [ ]
8. Functional operability verified: [X) Yes [ ) No [ ] Not Applicable
9. Test Results including modifications made: V~IX> lmC/Rt /O tJ S
1t . Othe r tests performed (such as fragxlity test, including results1:
1 f ua.'> f>cat>on bv Ana'is or b the Combination of Test and Analysis ther.
~Com ! ete:
Description of Test including Results: 8 l —Ax(AL Ad~ N 9 oC AS IS4!=TS
.'1e.r.: 'f Analyses: tO tJ vl C Ard L s>S o wCLO BAsC & t Y
Static Analysis[>() Dynam:c Analysis
[ ] Equivalent Static Analysxs[ ] Tame-History[ ) Response Spectrum
3. Node 'y~e: [>,') 3D ) 2D
[/) Finite Element [ ) Beam
[ ] lD
] Closed Form Solut>or.
) Computer Codes: fFrequency Range and ho. of modes considered:
[ ] Hand Calculations
Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [' Absolute Sum [X) SRSS
[ ] Other:(speci fy1
6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerations in the model:
(7 tSQ Ft<AL gt Ai<F I MTiSBnJ P OC tS ~=g T
EXHIBIT VI-26
0
BOP
8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Loador Response
A. Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress
To talStress
StressAllowable
B. Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional
0 erabilit
+ AHAJTN/4 Filv'AL Q4lALIP'l B'AV(an/ 8o
VIII. alification Deficiencies
The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:
cwork orders written:
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer
Group Supervisor
EXH IBIT V I-27
0
CHECK LIST
ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION
I General
This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components- Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on .the same sheet.
Type ofEquipmentComponent
EquipmentLocation
Bldg. Elev. ManufacturerModelNumber
PVNGSSpec.
PVNGS
TagNumbers
FLEGTRIG6 E~ECAroR
VlfSfc.
QlfSFL lao PARs~v-Pf~'8c Fs4-I/099 WA-oi g
Dt' -8oiDcy Ho I
Additional Information
II 0 erabilit Re uirements
Environ-mental
Designator
DesignBasis
.Acc'dent
Time WhenReq 1 T 0
9 Initiationof DBA
Natureof
OperationEquipment Function
ioch/WS~8
g&T iRF-a84 g~riuuo ug
gpugghrE ENEPAFwc.V
poaEC
Additional Information
III Desi nated Environment
Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization
EXHIBIT VI-28
Page -2-
IV uglified Environment
Complete'exhibit 1. Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?
Q Yes - Proceed to item V
g) No - Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable-(Attach additional sheets as required.)
gtoa 1'w~ OuwER QEVEaoP~E~7-
V ~Man in
Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?
0 Yes — Proceed to item VIg No — Describe differences and indicate. whether or not differences are
significant
Q Significant Q Not Significant
Justif ication: i 8~5 C'8& ON>EK'E'VE<ul ~ E~t
EXHIBIT VI-29
Page -3-
VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientation
1) . Was equipme'nt qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc )? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~
0 Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg-, wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg., piping)
No orientation requirementOther - Clarify PRO 8 UIVVEJC 'DELJEC.Ol &EAl 7
2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. )
Was test mount same as intended site installation?
C3 Yes - Proceed to item VII|2 No — Explain i 806r84/N L)~>E8 PF O'QOf~E~T
VII uglification Method
A. Identify qualification method:
R Type Test - Report 8
R Analysis — Report Pr
Q Operating Experience Report 8
Q On-Going Qualification - Report 8
R Combination of Methods (check all that apply)
B. Describe qualification method. What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis; or inspection.
RP448~ uA'PER DEvEcolwE~r
EXHIBIT VI-30
0
l
l
Page -4-
C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence~ (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.
1- Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3. Operation (extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic6. DBA Operation7. .Post DBA Operation8. Inspeection
Q Yes — Proceed to D
gg No — Explain test sequence U~<+ >~~~<4'~~~~
Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?
Q Yes - ExplainQ No — Equipment is not qualified
D- Provide additional test data as noted: PRMtWW ON>CC PF VG~f~E~I) Seismic testing consisted of Ogg's before/after SSE's
using the required response spectra/required input motion noted inFSAR Section
2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:
Q Yes — Proceed to 3
Q No — Explain:
3) Test temperatures were measured by
0 Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4
P Other - Explain and Justify
4) Heat aging was conducted by
Q Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5
Q Ocher — Explain and Justify
EXHIBIT V I-31
0
0
l
Page -5-
5) Humidity aging was conducted by:
6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?
C3 Yes — Proceed to 7
Q No - Justify:
7) The per formance characteristics required to be monitored vere:
8) The performance characteristics monitored were:
9) Performance characteristics during testing vere monitored
Q ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at
g Not applicable — Justify:intervals
10) Does test report identify that instrumentation vas in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?
0 Yes - Proceed to llQ No - Justify:
EXHIBIT VI-32
e
Page -6-
11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc.) simulate installed condit'ion?
P Yes — Proceed to VIIIQ No - Justify:
VIII Evaluation
Qualified lifetime is:
40 yearsOther — Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):
QVAQ(F Id.ATIo~ 8/D7 C orbs PIETE
Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:
BechtelLog No.
ReportNo Subject
Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of rep'ort)
MoMEhdAiC.Z8c, E
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer:
Group Supervisor:
EXHIBIT V I-33
EXHIBIT 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER
CRITIII %SIN l(6IS CCIKÃl(IKUCES C l%% IDTESAATED)
t'Rc ( em~U&ee. e
PEv Fc.or
aMT'%ZQK
(DSli)
ITIVEWflDITT(S)
WIATltÃ(DADS)IIO TEAA
IDTKSAAIED
N)SE)
06)I(NS
EXHIBIT 2
QUALIFICATION MARGIN
CRITIC KSIR DASIS KCITEXT(IKLllKS«) TEAA INESAATED)
KPEAATIA(E(T)
l%$QJK(DS16)
%1NIYEI(DIIDITT(S)
DADIATIO((AADS)
W TEAA
IDTESAATED
N)SE)
()GII(A(S
EXHIBIT YI-54
0
e
ualif ication Sugar of E ui ment
Plant Name: PVP W Q1. '= Utility:2. NSSS: 3. A/E:
Type:
Bechtel BWR
Quantity
11. Con onent Yienr: pi[/+ C pede'pdB A~o sg
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS JIP BOP
2. Model Number: L, - 0
3. Vendor: Et EC T KoOoc.VSAH.Zo~ —S c C6<C;5 E'L.Ec TIr rc Pko Doc T5)
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included:
Physical Description a. Appearance
b. Dimensions loCs E'u C 0
REC, 7+a r Mg,
c. Weight
6. Location: Building: D I M E'ER, AT-c
Elevation: M SZ.
3APieid Nonnting C ndioti so[op Bolt (No., Site~
[ ) Weld (Lengt l[ )
8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):S /APok Cy, cB Co. o6 fee i . i '~F': T&
9. a. Functional Description: tPKovl og BmC c Ere'c. PogE~
b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
(g Both
10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: /< 4 -/> -4 -
0/8'XHIBIT
VI-35
e
111. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: Ye.
IV. E ui ment ualxfxcation Method: Test:
! No
hna lysis:
Combination of Test and Analysis:
Test and/or Analysis by AlSS C.o Sc c.7Am' - //~f(Name of Company or Laboratory 6 Report No.)
V. Vibration In ut:
Loads considered: 1. (P Seismic only 2. [ ) Hydrodynamsc on)y
5. [ ) Combination of 4
e'
6. Method of combining RRS: [ ) hbsolute Sum [ J SRSS ( J
(other, specxfylCea r e~ C]VE AC.y
Required Response Spectra {at tach the graphs):
3. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
S/S = F/B "-
VI. I! ua.'i f>cation" b Test then Com Iete:
1. [ ) Single Frequency J Multi-Frequency:J random) sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-hxis
3. No; of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other(speci fy)
4, Frequency Range:
5. TRS enveloping RRS.using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) Yes (plot TRS on RRS graphs)[ ] No
EXHIBIT VI-56
e!
I
0g
l
Input g-level Test at S/S =
7. Lahnratory Mounting:
i/B = V =
1. f ) Bolt (No. , Size ) f ) Me)d (Length ) f )
S. Functional operability verified: f ] yes f ) No f ] Not Applicable
9".. Test Result,s including modifications made:
ll, Ot.her tests performed (such as fragility test, including resultsj:
Vi.'. lf Qualification bv Ana'is or b the Combination of T'est and Analysis t.her.
~corn ) etc:
1. Description of Test including Results:
Me h: 'f Ana.'ysis
! Static AnalysisDynamic Analysis
f ] Equivalent St,at.ic Analysis) Time-History
f ) Response Spectrum
3. Mode: Tpge: f]3D f ) 2D f)lD) Finite Element f ) Beam
f ) Computer Codes: g5'requencyRange and No. of modes consider'ed:
] Hand Calculat,ions
] Closed Form Solution
Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: f ) Absolute Sum f ] SRSS
f ) Other:(speci fy)
6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerations in the model: 8 I~IOL Un/ F
Q p V/Bh/
EXHIBIT VI-57
0
BOP
8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Loador Response
A. Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress
To talStress
StressAllowable
B- Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional
0 erabilit
~h/ REVi<~
VIII'lificationDeficiencies
The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:
Work orders written:
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer
Group Supervisor
EXHIBIT VI-38
0
I
I
e
ualif ication Summar of E ui ment
I. Plant Name;,P Y/[[/'6S
) .;, Uti )it'y:Type:
pw x
3. A/E.: Bechte) Bt'R
II. Com onent Name:
l. Scope: I J NSSS (gJ BOPs
2 . Node) Numbe r: Quan t i ty: ~sf ~Zu~ir )
3. Vendor:
4. lf the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included:
5. Physical Description a. Appearance
b. Dimensions
c. freight ~ O
6. Location: Building:
Elevationg4
7. Field [iounting Conditions [i[] Bolt (go.~ , gize~y )
[ J Veld (Length )! J
8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
S/S: F/B: V:
9. a. Functional Description: M vc ~e mc A C i~v
b. Is the equipment required for fQ Hot Standby JA) Cold Shutdown
fXJ Both
10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 'D4'd7 -/3- AP-o/g
EXHIBIT VI-39
e
Ill. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: [P] Ye=
IV. E ui ment uglification Method: Test:
! No
Analysis:
Combinat.ion of Test and Analysis:
Test and/or Analysis by C" > V/-(Name of Com ~ or Laboratory 6 Report No.)
V. Vibration In ut:
1. Loads considered: l. [g Seismic only 2. [ ) Hydrodynamic only
3. [ ] Explosive only 4. [/) Other (Specify)
5. P<) Combination of
o/'gwvi Q
6. Met.hod of combining RRS: [jQ Absolut.e Sum [ ) SRSS [(other, specify)
14'.
Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): ~Pe'r ™c
3. Required Accelerat,ion in Each Direct.ion:
S/S = F/B =
VI. If uglification b Test t.hen Com let.e:
I. [ ] Single Frequency) random
] Multi-Frequency: [ ) sine beat.
[ ]
2. [ ] Single Axis J Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Ot.her(speci fy)
4. Frequency Range:
5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) Yes (plot TRS on RRS graphs)[ ] No
EXHIBIT V I-40
i
~ ~
~ ~, ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I ~
~ ~ I ~
~ ~ ' ~ I ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~' ~
~ ~
~ ' . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . II ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
I . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
0
t
BOP
8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Loador Response
A Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress
To talStress
StressAllowable
B., Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional
0 erabilit
+ ~N ae~iE~
VIII alification Deficiencies
The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:
Work orders written:
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer
Group Supervisor
EXHIBIT V I-42
0
e
ualification Suaxna of E ui ment
~ 1. Plant Name: / V+l . Uti 1 ity:2. NSSS:
Type:
3. A/E: Bechte) BUR
I I . Com oaent Name: g~y~g ggg~gpgg gggggp~ gggj/Scope: f ] NSSS ]Q BOP
Hwo- 8 1-7/dS-SS'odel
Number: Quaniiry: ~MO&it)ck+~ ~A~rwzc ~~A'~~
Vendor:~4sz~y TEA'r>SIf the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the
devices included: ~ 4 >9rgnrsuu rb'ZF~.
Physi cal Descripti on a. Appearance /de jgg 73@~~
b. Dimens ions 7+& g W$ ~ 8 4 /<~c. 4'eight
6. 'Location: Building:
Elevation
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. , Size )Veld (Lengt ) arcedt) ac 7Fdrll.W4'L~
8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
g~~~dul4 AT F/B: W V:7pgg 7j'/$E ZA/7ZOL . SNZP~nfcy'Z5SZ
9. a. Functional Description: i2
b. Is the equipment required for t ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown
Both
10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: -D/g
id+~ p g6 k'TS P /~~+)
EXHIBIT VI-C5
0
I
J
CHECK LIST
ENVIRONMENTAL UALIFICATION
I General
This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components- Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.
Type ofEquipmentComponent Bldg» Elev.
EquipmentLocation
ManufacturerModelNumber
PVNGS
Spec.
PVNGS
TagNumbers
7owcR. ~~ VER.SI
AqOMClS, INC. ~0 ~E'- pw - Hli<- er.c.—ua,6-PL% - Qia
Additional Information
Environ-mental
Designator
DesignBasis
Accident
Time @henReq'd T 06 Initiation
of DBA
Natureof
- OperationEquipment Function
(VLOC.~
MSW
Ehf7lRZ
Dew CoN l-lHuo«T'0 CHa~ CLP ss16
~ 5<rt ea,i es<+HYlN4LSVRL$
Additional Information
III Desi nated Environment
Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization
EXHIBIT V I-44
e
Page -2-
IV uglified Environment
Complete exhibit 1 ~ Compare exhibit 1 to PSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the PSAR requirements?
Q Yes — Proceed to item V
{g No - Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)
rVOPM kL RAWIAT'I4~ A/07 C'&5 / PE'R'ED . 5EE'7-Em
Z
V ~Mar in
Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?
0 Yes - Proceed to item VIg No - Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences are
significant
Q Significant g Not Significant
Justif i~~tio~: f.gC55U gC. 8 > ~AL gAZ gRriOM Pa
~or /Ayah Af+gA>M. SimCE ghr<EteY cHACQER
IA) V&JT]<ATES we~ fXEssoP2(+zs 0'die wrac,PRE5SuC'E ROE'5 Wa r gEeuiRE mWRc i~. D8A
RADr47'I om >aug'g+L Egc GEps ~nEwAcg~P]+7-]0< POSE g Y 84&4'5T ~
PEP''R'4
0 urrov E,
EXH IBIT V I-45
0
Page -3-
VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientation
1) Was 'equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc.)? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~
El Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg-, wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg., piping)
No orientation requirementOther - Clarify
2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. ) UWR PZ CEO'iE AJ
Was test mount same as intended site installation?
C3 Yes - Proceed to item VIIQ Nn — Explain
VII ua1ification Method
A. Identify qualification method:
g Type Test - Report 8 44 ia ++
Q Analysis — Report
Q Operating Experience Report P
Q OnWoing Qualification - Report />
Q Combination of Methods (check all that apply)
B. Describe qualification method. - What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope 'and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.
T.EKE 9%5- t g Z6E~ 3g -l97%QgF~ 450 —l +$ +E't P ~ —(97 f
EXHIBIT VI-46
0
Page -4-
C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.
1. Inspection. 2. Operation (baseline)
3. Operation (extremes)4. Aging5 ~ Seismic6. DBA Operation7. Post DBA Operation8. Inspeection
Pg Yes —'roceed to D
Q No — Explain test sequence
Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?
C3 Yes - ExplainQ No - Equipment is not qualified
D. Provide additional test data as noted:
1) Seismic testing consisted of ~ OBE's before/~~ l SSE'susing the required response spectra/required input motion noted in'FSAR Section 3~
2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:
El Yes — Proceed to 3
Q No — Explain:
3) Test temperatures were measured by
0 Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4
g Other - Explain and Justify DK R6 I KVJ
4) Heat aging was conducted by
QArrhenius Methods — Proceed to 5
g Other - Explain and Justify hJDGR R.CUIT'uJ
EXHIBIT VI-47
0
0
Page -5-
5) Humidity aging was conducted by: 5 /A
6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?
CI Yes - Proceed to 7
Q No — Justify:
7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored vere:
V e LT'A GuPuT')
The performance characteristics monitored were:
R.
9) Performance characteristics during testing vere monitored
Q ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at
g Not applicable — Justify:intervals
hJ V 1 euJ
10) Does test report identify that instrumentation was in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?
0 Yes - Proceed to llg No - Justify: QhJDER. V l 6'4J
EXHIBIT V I-48
0
Page -6-
11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc.) simulate installed condition?
El Yes - Proceed to VIIIQ No - Justify:
VIII Evaluation
Qualified lifetime is,:
40 yearsOther — Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):
Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:
Bechtel'og
No.Report
No SubjectProprietay (Yes/No)
(If proprietary identify location of report)
Gs I Q7+uAl.LfSCAT(I4
QR. I+OO ~ MASAN i66Am ea>
'tes +~c.~ma >.t). <. Gn
~
~ ~
o~ea. <a~vCmiM PR.»><>~qa C. ~v. «vs'.~ i~M T~
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer:
Group Supervisor:
EXHIBIT YI-49
0
0
0
EXHIBIT 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER
~ITIR
NN%1U
T9VENlLKe)
l%$SNKesto
%&TIVEIkklI0 ITT(S)
lOIATIR(Ok(51W TEAA
IOTE6kATEO
15E)
OflllCA(S
32- I Q.Q.
ATMOS
0 - 9s
%AIR RSIS CCIIEÃT(lated e me IOTENATEO)
LOCO mS t.tk
3L I RQ
kronos
0 — 9S
Jo
EXHIBIT 2
QUALIFICATION MARGIN
(tw)ITIR KSISA OASIS kCCICO(T
(IO(UCES AO lEAk INTE6kATEO)
TE)PEAATIOK
e)
esl6)
DATIVEWIIOITT(1)
OAOIATtR(kAOS)(lO TEAR
INTE6kATEO
N)SE)
C)6(l CAIS
i lS
~20 +5
0
-8 &lan0
1'
9 p lo
N/A
EXHIBIT V I-50
0
a
ualification Sunxnar of E ui ment
I
Pr'h'GS >I. Utility:
Type:
Q PVR
2. NSSS:. 3. A/E Bechtel BVR
Il. Com onent
'3
Namr: g /~AIF~+Ag g(Ynganlsivz~
C~)-Nndet Number: 0 — r;m= Quantity:
rMJ ~>-0 Ce
Vendor: / dA'f
the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included: je
Physical Description a. Appearance
Jlb. Dimensions
c. Veight
Location: Building:
Elevation:
A A?dl.
e
Field Mounting Conditions, [ ] Bolt (}o., SizeVeld (Len th
I ]
Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical);
S/S: F/B: v: /a. , Functional Description:
CLA55 18 S rx7/OW gg~mi~b. Is the equipment required for I ] Hot Standby
~ Both
] Cold Shutdown
10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
C4) wEs7- spaz~ gpPwnrki~ ~ DPc7~K~ Wg4 ~/n/C ~~~~+
F-/)p'EA i. IK Wd T /A/cd~&~.EXHIBIT VI-51
0'
III. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: ~ Yt = Kotlat.E ui ment ugly fxcation Method: Test:
Analysis:
Combination of Test and AnaIysis: lAPgTy
Test andior Analysis by
V. Vibration In ut:
O'T-/me ~f ompany or Laboratory & Report ho.)~~ zdN rdPz~ EPWS-v r
1. Loads considered: l." [g Seismic only 2. f ] Hydrodynamic only
3. [ ) Explosive only 4. [ ] Other (Specify)
5. [ ) Combination of
6. Method of combining RRS: [ ) Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ]
Z. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):
(other, specify,l
//@ af
3. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:
s(s = .4/ F/B =~,If ua.'if>cation b 'est then Com lete:
I
1, [ ) Single Frequencyrandom
[Q Multi-Frequency: [ ) sine beat[ ]
2. [ ) Single Axis ~ Multi-Axis~-F9/v z-Fd/y
3. lio. of Qualification Tests: OBE~ $$/y SEE~I-SS Other(specify)
nFrequency Range:
TRS enveloping RRSeusing Multi-Frequency Test Q Yes (plot TRS on RRS graphs)) No
EXHIBIT V I-52
Qi
t. Input s-level .Test at s/s =~ p/B = ~st v = ~7. Lal oratory Mounting: Zc5 7 8
1 ~/We7S. Functional operability verified: ~ Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
Test Results including modifications made:7 4
;!. lf
Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results!:
4' P Szx 'Egu~~~r~r~7-i~w ~z7. QPmP4+rE.ualiFication bv Ana'is or b 'he Combination of Test and Analvsis ther.
C~am lets: pg y /Ir/ppgyg+Qm~Description of Test including Results:t '')eth; ' f Ana.'ysis:
l Static Analysis) Dynam c Analysis
f ) Equivalent. Static Analysis[ ] Ti.me-History[ ) Response Spectrum
3. Node'pge: [ ] 3D t)2D[ ) Finite Element [ ) Bear.
[)lD) Closed Form Sclutio..
[ ) Computer Codes:
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:
] Hand Calculations
method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other:(specify)
e
6. Damping:r
Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerations in the model:
EXHIBIT VI-53
e
e
l
BOP
8- Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Loador Response
A. Identification - Location CombinationSeismicStress
To talStress
StressAllowable
B Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional
0 erabilit
VIII. alification Deficiencies
The following- is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:
Work orders written:
Evaluation Approval:
Reviewing Engineer
Group Supervisor
EXHIBIT VI-50
0
CHECK LIST
ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION
I General
This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components- Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.
Type ofEquipmentComponent
Q oo V. Pinup gCASvcS
Bldg.
Cunt/8zN-rAEJVj
Elev.
EquipmentLocation
ManufacturerModelNumber
V<gewp u.
PVNGSSpec.
l)-GM-OS8
PVNGS
TagNumbers
N le
Additional Information CA6LC hS CWSS- t (QKe5 PoL, El K LeHE'
6$,a~~ og
Environ-mental
Designator
Design, BasisAccident
Time WhenReq'd T 0
9 Initiationof DBA
Natureof
OperationEquipment Function
l oca
M. S t.E
mriRePs+ C4nll raw y~
DEMI&~/ dwEKcg+$ $ ,
lE'4
cePneuw
Additional Information
III Desi nated Environment
Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization
EXHIBIT VI-55
0
0
Page -2-
IV uglified Environment
Complete exhibit 1. Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?
g Yes — Proceed to item V
0 No — Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function- Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)
R Yes — Proceed to item VIQ No - Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences are
significant
Q Significant Q Not Significant
t V ~Mar ia
Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?
Justification:
EXH IB IT VI-56
0
i
Page -3-
VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientation
1) Was equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc.)? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~
Cl Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg., wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg , piping)
No orientation requirementOther - Clarify
e
2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. )
Was test mount same as intended site installation?
0 Yes — Proceed to item VIIg Hn — Explain nfo7- haec.i CAd C.e
VII uglification Method
A- Identify qualification method:
g Type Test - RepetrpP.sett pyty RGpoCT g+M~ C/aK/7$
Q Analysis - Report 0
Q Operating Experience Report P
Q OnWoing Qualification — Report 8
Q Combination of Methods (check all that apply)
B. Describe qualification method. What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from, test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualification'is used, describe program and identify scope =and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.
~GGE ~~~ -)9~V z-eeE ~53- !579
EXHIBIT VI-57
0
i I
Page -4-
C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable)'equence specif ied in IEEE 323-1974.
1. Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3. Operation {extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic g Yes - Proceed to D6. DBA Operation Q No - Explain test sequence7. Post DBA Operation8- Inspeection
Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?
C3 Yes - ExplainQ No — Equipment is not qualified
D. Provide additional test data as noted:
1) Seismic testing consisted of — OBE's before/after ggg'susing the required response spectra/required input motion noted inFSAR Section
2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:
g Yes « Proceed to 3
Q No - Explain:
3) Test temperatures were measured by
Q Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4
R Other - Explain and Justify ANDES. 6PVleuJ
4) Heat aging was conducted by
E Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5
@Other- Explain and Justify
EXHIBIT VI-58
0
e
Page -5-
5) Humidity aging was conducted by:
6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?
0 Yes - Proceed to 7
Q No — Justify: tAHOGR Rr 1 ew
7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored were:
t'riN 5(STANCs N 0 tMSNLA'TlaN
I 1
8) The pe'rformance characteristics monitored were:
VMOea ~i ewer
9) Performance characteristics during testing. were m'onitored
Q ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at
g Not applicable — Justify:intervals
10) Does test report identify that instrumentation was in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?
Cl Yes - Proceed to 11
R No - Justify:
EXHIBIT VI-59
0
Page -6-t11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supports
etc.) simulate installed condition?
QYes - Proceed to VIIIg No — Justify: Vle&
VIII Evaluation
Qualified lifetime is:
40 yearsOther - Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):
Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:
BechtelLog No.
ReportNo Sub)ect
Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of report)
Ec 5'8 —i~gbc~g~ QuAVl'<ch7l CW
RePo Az'F F(ILcwh~c/aa.he cM4E4
Evalua tion Approval:
Reviewing Engineer:
Group Supervisor:
EXHIBIT VI-60
0
0
EXHIBIT 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED{TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER
tsK)ITIa
DAAAIUEA
TUSE'IAIEtT)
lKSSLREPSI6)
KLATI)E)ASIIDITTIS)
M!AT laWt)S)W TEAA
IDTESAATED
DOSE)
EK)IItALS
l ed
/y/0
KSIID IASIS CEIKÃ1tIKLXES a TEAA IDIENATED)
LOCA ASKED
370
stew~ / A)4.AtixruKF
g.3 )ceo 7
~ P+M aims~ ter) HyOrblKihl6'P
EXHIBIT 2
QUALIFICATION MARGIN
ttDD)It la
TAAIKTEA
19'AIWEtf)
DKSSNEPSI6)
KLATIYE
lthlDITTtS)
DAD)AT)aIAADS)IID TEAR
INTE6AAIED
DE)SE)
DUIIEALS
+JO
KS I6)) DAS IS KEIDOITIIDELDEES DD IEAA IN1ESAATED)
oem n Sc.8
+t84E) PPAA hokoa
EXHIBIT YI-61
0
EM-051
BATTERY
CHARGERS
POWER
CONVERSION
PRODUCTS
SAFETY-RELATED DESIGN PROBLEMS WITH BATTERY CHARGERS
HAVE PREVENTED SHIPMENT TO THE SITE AND'WILL
REQUIRE REWORK, TELEX SENT TO PCP 8/22/80 ADDRESS-
ING QUALIFICATION AREAS TO BE RESOLVED,
JM-108 SESS
(SAFETY EQUIP-
MENT STATUS
SYSTEM)
BETA PRODUCTS TEST PLAN DUE TO BE RESUBMITTED BY 8/8/80 HOT YET
RECEIVED. SUPPLIER IS NOT RESPONSIVE,
JM-601A NUCLEAR CONTROL
SERVICE- VALVES COMPONENTS,
INC.
START OF TESTING AT HYLE LABORATORIES DELAYED PEND-
ING BECHTEL REVIEW OF REVISED QUALIFICATION PLANS
NOW FORECAST TO BE RETURNED TO VENDOR AS STATUS 2
ON 9/22/80, FINAL AGREEMENT HAS NOT BEEN REACHED
WITH VENDOR ON Af'lOUNT OF ADDITIONAL COSTS,
EXHIBIT VII-1
(CONTINUED)
P 0
JM-601B NUCLEAR F ISCHER
SERVICE CONTROL CONTROLS
VALVES
SUPPLIER HAS NOT RESOI VED BCP COMMENTS ON ITT-GC
FINAI REPORT FOR THE VALVE ACTUATOR, FISCHER.CON-
TROLS IS NOT BEING RESPONSIVE,
MM-018 DIESEL
GENERATOR SET
COOPER ENERGY BPC IS STILL WAITING FOR CES DOCUMENT TRANSMITTALS,
SERVICES A LETTER WAS SEI'LT TO CES ON 9/4/80 REQUESTING A
TEST PROGRAM SCHEDULE BY 9/10/80 AND A TEST PROGRAM
BY 11/1/80, NO RESPONSE TO DATE,
MM-021 BINGHAM-
AUXILIARYFEED W I LLAMETTE/
WATER PUMPS TERRY
PM-221A DRESSER/
NUCLEAR SERVICE ROTORK
VALVE
BINGHAM-WILLAMETTEHAS BEEN REQUESTED TO PREPARE A
COST ESTIMATE AND SCHEDULE TO COMPLETE THE QUALIFI-
CATION PROGRAM, ESTIMATE DUE 8/15/80 NOT YET
RECEIVED,
AGING TEST OF ROTORK ACTUATOR DUE TO START 8/20/80
NOT YET STARTED, TEST PLAN STILL NOT FORMALLY SUB-
MITTED, TWX SENT TO EXPEDITE,
EXHIBIT VII-2