Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Investor DayFit for complexity
1 3 D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 6
2
Eni’s unique business model
Fit for complexity
2014-2016 STRATEGY EXECUTION
A DISTINCTIVE MODELFOR VALUE GENERATION
FOCUS ON NEW PROJECTS
FPSO ready to sail off for Block 15/06
515
433
400
450
500
550
2008 2016
A challenging scenario
Brent | $/bl EU gas demand | bcm OECD EU refining
* Jan-Oct 2016
-16%-60%
5
Hub volumes
25% 74%*
15,5
13,9
0
2
4
6
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
2008 2016
$/b
bl
Mb
oe
/d
Oil demand Refining margin
6
Strategy execution and main milestones
PROFITABLE GROWTH
Transformationinto a fully integrated O&G Upstream enhancement
Restructuringmid-downstream
Cost efficiency
Capex -33%Opex -23%G&A -33% (vs. 2014)
Mid-downstream FCF positive
Kashaganstart-up
CoralEni
Investmentapproval
Zohr disposal• 10% stake to BP• 30% stake to
Rosneft
Neworganisation
Take-or-pay renegotiations
G&Asavings
Upstreamgrowth +10%
Noroos and Zohrdiscoveries
Refining and Chemicalsback to EBIT breakeven
Galp and Snamdisposals
Dividendrebased
Reducedrefiningcapacity
Launch Capexand opexsaving plan
Saipemdeconsolidation
Zohr FID
Goliatstart-up
Gasrenegotiation
2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6
MILESTONES
On equity accounting
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
Transformation into afully integrated O&G company
Exploration & Production DIVISION
Gas & PowerDIVISION
Refining & Marketing
DIVISION
Consolidated companies
Versalis 100%
43%Saipem 8.5% Snam
16% Galp
Eni 2014
CORPORATE HOLDING
On Equity accountingConsolidated company
Versalis 100% 30.5% Saipem
Eni 2016
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
Exploration & Production Gas & Power
Refining & Marketing
Energy Solutions
7
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
CASH IN FROM TRANSFORMATION
€ 10BLN
SAVING FROM REORGANIZATION
€700 MLN/YEAR
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2013 2014 - 2016
Restructuring mid-downstream
RefiningBreak-even margin EBIT adj | $/bl
ChemicalsEBIT result | € bln
4.2
7.5
0.3
ToP Recovery
Make-up gas
8
Gas & PowerToP recovery | € bln
2013 2016 exp.
-0,4
0,3
2013 2016 exp.
9
Cash flow generated by mid-downstream restructuring
∆ CFFO 2014-2016 VS 2011-2013: ~€ 9 Bln
-0,3
-3
-0,4-0,2
3,1
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 exp
> 2
€ bln
0
4
8
12
16
2013 2016 exp.
1450
1500
1550
1600
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
2013 2016 exp. 2016exit volume
10
Delivering on upstream enhancement
Cash flow per barrel | $/boe
30
25
20
2013 2016 exp.
@ 109 $/bl
+20%
+15%
Production | kboed
>30%
Operating Cash Flow | € bln
HISTORICAL RECORD OF PRODUCTION AND ENHANCED CASH FLOW
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2014 2016
11
Improving portfolio cost structure
Technical costs | $/boeNew projects breakeven | $/boe
OPEX
Development
Exploration
-30%
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2013 2014 2015 2016
12
Cost optimization
CUMULATIVE COST SAVING € 10 Bln
G&A costs | € blnGroup Capex | € bln Upstream Opex | $/boe
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2014 2015 2016 exp.
Majors
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2014 2016 exp.
-33%
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
2014 2016 exp.
-33%
2011-13 2014-16
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
13
An effective strategy to halve cash neutrality
127
50
40
60
80
100
120
140
2013 2014 2015 2016 exp.
* Organic coverage of Capex through CFFO
-60%
Price of cash neutrality* | $/boe Cumulative Operating Cash Flow | € bln
Brent / $/bl37
Snam
Avg. Brent 110 $/bl 64 $/bl
34
Noroos, Egypt
15
A distinctive strategy on exploration
Thinking out of the box
Our people
Technology and Big Data
Unconventional Focus On Conventional plays
Ownership and high stake
Early mover approach
Risk diversification on multiple plays
Rapid Resource conversion
Main drivers of exploration strategy
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cumulative Yearly additions
16
Key metrics of our success
Accelerating conversion to reserves and economic value | bln boeCumulative discovered resources | bln boe
3P or under study
FID
under disposal
disposed
13 13
17
Map of exploration discoveries since 2008
Oil
Gas
Jangkrik
Merakes
Johan Castberg
Zohr
Great Nooros
Sankofa
Marine XII
15/06
Oglan
Perla
Hadrian/Lucius
Coral/Mamba
Nyonie Deep
18
“Designing to cost” from exploration to development
exploration
exploration
reservoir studies
reservoir studies
engineering design
procurement and operations
procurement and operations
Traditional project schedule
Eni phased / fast track project schedule
FID
exploration
reservoir studies
engineering design
procurement and operations
FID
FIRST OIL
Strong integration from exploration to start-up thanks to leading edge technology
From a sequential to a parallel approach
Project phasing to reduce subsurface risks
3D reservoir models before exploration well for critical projects
Continuous reservoir updates and scenarios’ analysis
exploration
reservoir studies
engineering design
procurement and operationsprocurement and operationsFIRST OIL
front endloading
19
Ultra fast-tracking Zohr
• 6 wells + 26’’ line
• 1 control platform + 1 umbilical
• new onshore plant
• 14 additional wells + 2 x 30” export lines
• 2 umbilicals + Extension of new onshore plant
• 5 additional wells + additional 2x30” export lines
• 1 umbilical + Onshore compression
executionon
0.3 years 2 years
FID
April June August October Today
Zohr 2 Zohr 3 Zohr 4 Zohr 5 Zohr 6 Zohr 7
December 2017(accelerated start-up)
2.3 years2017 plan: re-entry & completion of first 6 wells
Discovery
Feb. 2016
Aug.2015
2016
ACCELERATED START-UP
RAMP-UP TO PLATEAU
PLATEAU EXTENSION
Zohr 1
20
Time-to-market of recent and ongoing main projects
Block 15/06 - West HubAngola
JangkrikIndonesia
PerlaVenezuela
Block 15/06 - East HubAngola
OCTPGhana
ZohrEgypt
Avg Time to Mkt
Discovery to FID: 2 years vs industry avg 4 yearsFID to Start up: 2.5 years vs industry avg 4.5 years
20102009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Project Progress
Marine XII - NenèCongo
Great NoroosEgypt
Discovery
FID (Final Investment Decision)
Start up
Legenda
60%
90%
35%
87%
100%
100%
65%
88%
21
Contribution to growth and cash flow
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2016 2017 2018
2016-2018 CUMULATED CFFO € 7.7 BLN
kboedCFFO € 4.3 bln
in 2018 @ $60/bl
43,5 50 60Brent$/bl
Contribution from Block 15/06, Jangkrik, Perla ,OCTP, Marine XII, Great Noroos, Zohr, Goliat and Kashagan
22
Increased upstream capital efficiency
E&P Capex* vs production Reserve Replacement Ratio | %
Max 131%
Min -12%
-50
0
50
100
150
2013 2014 2015
Majors
€ bln kboed
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
6
8
10
2013 2016 2017
E&P CAPEX Production
* Before disposal
23
Our strategy to unlock portfolio value
20% Mozambique (2013) 3.4 € bln
40% Zohr (2016) 2 € bln
bln €
0
5
10
15
20
Transformation Dual exploration model
Galp, Snam,other
Saipem
Disposed stakes
Further disposals
Production (Mb/d) 1.6 >1.85
2013 TODAY
Projects breakeven ($/boe) 45 27
Organization IntegratedDivisional
Business model O&G focusConglomerate
Refining breakeven ($/bl)
Chemicals ebit
80% oil >70% hub
>8 4.2
FCF and EBIT negative
Structural break-even and self-financing
Capex coverage neutrality($/boe)
127 50
Inactive capital (bln €) 24 16
LT contracts G&P
24
Conclusion
CORPORATE & FINANCIALS
UPSTREAM
MID-DOWNSTREAM