Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0
20000
40000
60000
20162015201420132012
Num
ber
of A
sset
s R
epor
ted
Asset Data
Portfolio Data
New Construction
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% Other methods- Manual–visual readings- Provided by tenant - Other
Entities ranked by % of portfolio monitored LowHigh% o
f cov
erag
e by
type
of m
onito
ring
Automatic Meter
Readings
Basedon
Invoices
! "
70
60
50
40
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
75
50
25
2016 2015
PerformanceIndicators
BuildingCertifications
Stakeholder Engagement
Management
Policy &Disclosure
Risks &Opportunities
Monitoring & EMS
75
64
6648
44
64
83
Australia/NZ
Asia
Europe
NorthAmerica
E
T
S
C
E
T
S
C
E
T
S
C
E
T
S
C
EmployeesE TenantsT Supply chainsS CommunitiesC
2016 Improvement!
2016 Decline"Average Score/Type
2014438 GWh 592 GWh
2015
0.6% of totalenergy consumption
GRESB RatingThe GRESB Rating is an overall measure of how well ESG issues are integrated into the management and holdings of real estate companies and funds. The rating is calculated relative to the global performance of reporting entities.
2016 GRESB Snapshot
0 50 100
50
0
100
Prom
otio
n of
hea
lth
of e
mpl
oyee
s
Promotion of health through products and services
Leading in internal operations
Leading in products/services
Leading in both internal operations and products/services
GRESB H&W Average
174Entities
Average Score
58100
Leaders
62
OfficeListed
Australia/NZ
20112012
2013
20142015
2016
GRESB Model GRESB Aspects
Health & Well-being
Portfolio vs. Asset Data
Monitoring Energy Consumption in Buildings
$2.8 trillionThe total gross asset value (GAV) of companies and funds reporting to GRESB Real Estate in 2016.
201 entities are publicly traded, the remainder are private equity funds and accounts.
The 2016 GRESB Real EstateAssessment covers 66,000 assets across 63 countries on 6 continents.
759 Entities 63 Countries
Carbon Management
External review of carbon emissions data
Reporting carbon intensity data
Offsetting carbon emissions
Reporting carbon emissions data
Data management system in place
Risk assessments include carbon emissions
Due diligence process includescarbon emissions
Carbon emissions target in place
ESG policy includes carbon emissions
2016 Improvement
100%0% % of entities
!
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Global Average
Australia/NZ
Asia
Europe
North America
9876543210
Leaders(>= 7 indicators)
Number of carbon management practices reported
% o
f ent
ities
ESG Performance Dynamics
Key Performance Indicators (Total Footprint)Renewable Energy(generated on-site)
Stakeholder EngagementThe GRESB Real Estate Assessment provides stakeholder engagement indicators addressing employees, tenants, supply chains and communities.
99TWhEnergy!
3.5 months of the total electricity supply in the UK
27.9MtCO2"
3.5% of the CO2 emissionsfrom all global flight activity in
2015
0.47km3
Water#
20,000 times the volume of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting
Pool
15.5MtWaste$
2.5 times the weight of the Great Pyramid of Giza
GRESB provides systematic assessment, objective scoring and peer benchmarking of real asset investments around the world. GRESB’s unique data on the environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance of property companies and fund managers allows investors to better manage ESG risks and to enhance returns.
Overall GRESB scores continued to increase. The average GRESB Score increased from 55 to 60.
Australia/NZ entities outperformed all other regions with an average score of 74.
Office companies and funds outperformed other property types with an average score of 66.
Listed property companies outperformed private equity funds by 6 points.
Companies and funds reporting to GRESB significantly improve over time. Entities reporting for 7 years outperform the global average by 12 points.
In 2016, 227 entities reported data on 22,000 individual assets through automated data connections (APIs) or the GRESB Asset spreadsheet. The remainder of the GRESB data was reported at the portfolio level.
The GRESB Assessment aggregates information about data coverage (i.e., the fraction of a portfolio for which data is available) and data collection strategies (e.g., meters, invoices, etc.). GRESB participants use a mixture of automated meters, invoices and other methods to collect electricity consumption data. Approximately half of GRESB participants have electricity consumption data for their entire portfolio.
GRESB Carbon Management indicators can be considered individually (left panel) or as a set (right panel).
Key Performance Indicators GRESB Investor and Bank Members
AN OMERS WORLDWIDE COMPANY
© 2016 GRESB BV
About GRESBGRESB is an industry-driven organization committed to assessing the environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance of real assets globally, including real estate portfolios (public, private and direct), real estate debt portfolios and infrastructure. More than 200 members, including 58 pension funds and their fiduciaries, use GRESB data in their investment management and engagement process, with a clear goal to optimize the risk/return profile of their investments. For more information, visit www.gresb.com.
GRESB defines “like-for-like” as the fraction of a portfolio continuously owned by an entity for at least 24 months. Like-for-like measurements represent a relatively stable sub-set of a portfolio, and they may better reflect management actions to improve performance. GRESB like-for-like metrics do not directly account for variation in weather, occupancy or other factors.
GRESB provides two complementary measures of portfolio-level resource productivity, including environmental impact (energy, GHG, water and waste) per floor area and per dollar of gross asset value (GAV). Resource productivity varies between property types. Lower intensities indicate relatively less environmental impact per unit floor area or per dollar of asset value.
Institutional capital represented by 58 GRESB Investor Members
$7.6 trillion
Like-For-Like Change2014-2015 (relative)
Intensities2015
-1.2%-997GWh
ENER
GY
!Equivalent of
73,988 homes
OtherHotelResidentialIndustrialOfficeRetail
kWh/m2
GRESB Averages
MWh/$1M GAV
158 171 158
34 4290
44 31
1043734
102
357
279
-2%
-427kt
CAR
BO
N E
MIS
SIO
NS
"Equivalent of
90,197passenger cars
OtherHotelResidentialIndustrialOfficeRetail
kg/m2
GRESB Averages
tonnes/$1M GAV
40
66
45
4 1229
4 7
281410
27
97
63
-1.9%
-3hm3
WAT
ER
#Equivalent of
1,200 Olympic pools
OtherHotelResidentialIndustrialOfficeRetail
l/m2
GRESB Averages
m3/$1M GAV
1,088
571 810
146 229152203
410644
128239
921
2,236
512
Change in % of landfill waste
-1.97%
-135kt
WAS
TE
$
Equivalent of 14,963
truck loads
OtherHotelResidentialIndustrialOfficeRetail
kg/m2 GRESB Averagestonnes/$1M GAV
32
65
1 1621 2 3627 7 11 14
127