2
New data for North American property companies and funds show significant variation in health and well-being practices. Many companies are working to promote the health of their employees. A smaller fraction of participants complement these internal efforts with strategies to actively promote the health of customers through their products and services. GRESB Aspects Office Industrial 2014 2013 2012 2011 2015 2016 Region Score Carbon Management Health & Well-being Stakeholder Engagement GRESB Model Reporting carbon intensity data Offsetting carbon emissions Reporting carbon emissions data Data management system in place Risk assessments include carbon emissions Due diligence process includes carbon emissions Carbon emission target ESG policy includes carbon emissions External review of carbon emissions data 100% 0% % of entities 2016 Improvements 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Global Average Australia/NZ Asia Europe North America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Number of carbon management practices reported % of entities Leaders (>= 7 indicators) Renewable Energy (generated on-site) Region Score 59 100 178 155 151 115 94 60 56 36 18 15 5 22 6 New participants Churn Existing participants 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 32 26 41 36 52 40 Australia/NZ Asia Europe North America E T S C E T S C E T S C E T S C Employees E Tenants T Supply chains S Communities C 2016 Improvement 2016 Decline Average Score/Type 2014 284 GWh 383 GWh 2015 0.2% of total energy consumption in North America 0.1% of total energy consumption in North America H&W Entities North America 0 50 100 50 0 100 Promotion of health of employees Promotion of health through products and services Leading in operations Leading in products/services Leading in both operations and products/services H&W North America Response Rate Development GRESB Industry Partners NAREIT encourages the ongoing sustainability efforts of REITs and supports continued engagement with best practices tied to energy, water, waste and greenhouse gas reductions across all industry sectors. Steven A. Wechsler - President & CEO, NAREIT The annual GRESB Assessment process has become an important management tool for our members, and REALpac applauds the sustained progress and superior performance of Canadian companies to date. Michael Brooks - CEO, REALpac GRESB provides a solid benchmark for both investors and fund managers to measure real estate efficiencies and ESG best practices alongside financial performance. PREA is proud of our many members ranked amongst the top GRESB entities, and we fully support the industry’s sustainability efforts. Gail Haynes - CEO, PREA The average GRESB Score of North American companies and funds improved from 54 in 2015 to 59 in 2016. North American office portfolios continue to have the highest average GRESB Score. GRESB includes 11 indicators addressing the engagement of property companies and funds with employees, tenants, supply chain, and community. Each circle represents a point available for these 11 indicators. GRESB indicators can be examined individually or as functional groups to understand management and performance in key areas, such as carbon, water, waste, and health. The charts below illustrate average responses to individual carbon management indicators and the cumulative achievement of the set of carbon management strategies. The GRESB Assessment provides data on year-over-year growth in on-site renewable energy. The dark shading indicates renewable energy generated by companies and funds based in the region. The light shading indicates renewable energy generated elsewhere in the world. 75 50 25 2016 2015 Performance Indicators Building Certifications Stakeholder Engagement Management Policy & Disclosure Risks & Opportunities Monitoring & EMS 77 70 64 65 46 45 64 Real estate is central to the health of the North American economy, its natural environment, and its people. There is growing appreciation that the financial performance of real estate investments is intimately tied to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Economically, real estate is an essential part of investment portfolios for institutional and private investors, historically providing attractive total returns and low correlations with other asset classes. Environmentally, commercial and residential real estate have significant impacts, consuming 81% of total U.S. electricity use and contributing directly to 12% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. There is also growing recognition that real estate plays a central role in shaping public health, as well as providing comfortable and productive indoor environments. Institutional investors have begun to recognize these issues as sources of value and risk. As a result, investors are increasingly requesting high quality information about the ESG performance of their investments. GRESB meets this growing need with systematic assessment, objective scoring, and peer benchmarking. This year’s 2016 GRESB snapshot for North America illustrates continued growth in GRESB participation with 178 companies and funds providing information about ESG performance. Entities reporting over multiple years demonstrate steady year-on-year improvements in overall ESG performance. Diving deeper, the new data show that overall performance is underpinned by increasing engagement from senior leaders, more formal policy commitments, new environmental management systems and increasingly sophisticated information systems. For example, 2016 GRESB participants provided asset-level operational performance data for more than 22,000 individual buildings worldwide, often feed directly from third-party tools. Ultimately, these trends matter because they show that, on average, North American property companies are acting to improve ESG performance – reducing greenhouse gas emissions, saving energy, conserving water, and providing healthier indoor environments. Leading North American companies are rewarded with more efficient, more desirable properties, while their investors benefit from higher returns and lower risk. 2016 GRESB Snapshot - North America

2016 GRESB Snapshot - North America · New data for North American property companies and funds show significant variation in health and well-being practices. Many companies are working

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2016 GRESB Snapshot - North America · New data for North American property companies and funds show significant variation in health and well-being practices. Many companies are working

New data for North American property companies and funds show significant variation in health and well-being practices. Many companies are working to promote the health of their employees. A smaller fraction of participants complement these internal efforts with strategies to actively promote the health of customers through their products and services.

GRESB Aspects

Office

Industrial

2014

20132012

2011

2015

2016 Region Score

Carbon Management

Health & Well-being

Stakeholder Engagement

GRESB Model

Reporting carbon intensity data

Offsetting carbon emissions

Reporting carbon emissions data

Data management system in place

Risk assessments include carbon emissions

Due diligence process includescarbon emissions

Carbon emission target

ESG policy includes carbon emissions

External review of carbon emissions data

100%0% % of entities

2016 Improvements�

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Global Average

Australia/NZ

Asia

Europe

North America

9876543210Number of carbon management practices reported

% o

f ent

itie

s

Leaders(>= 7 indicators)

Renewable Energy (generated on-site)

Region Score

59100

178

155151

11594

6056

36 18 15 522

6

New participants ChurnExisting participants

2016201520142013201220112010

32

2641

36

52

40

Australia/NZ

Asia

Europe

NorthAmerica

E

T

S

C

E

T

S

C

E

T

S

C

E

T

S

C

EmployeesE TenantsT Supply chainsS CommunitiesC

2016 Improvement�

2016 Decline�Average Score/Type

2014284 GWh 383 GWh

2015

0.2% of totalenergy consumption

in North America

0.1% of totalenergy consumption

in North America

H&W EntitiesNorth America

0 50 100

50

0

100

Pro

mot

ion

of h

ealt

h of

em

ploy

ees

Promotion of health through products and services

Leading in operations

Leading in products/services

Leading in both operations and products/services

H&W North America

Response Rate Development

GRESB Industry PartnersNAREIT encourages the ongoing sustainability efforts of REITs and supports continued engagement with best practices tied to energy, water, waste and greenhouse gas reductions across all industry sectors.Steven A. Wechsler - President & CEO, NAREIT

The annual GRESB Assessment process has become an important management tool for our members, and REALpac applauds the sustained progress and superior performance of Canadian companies to date.Michael Brooks - CEO, REALpac

GRESB provides a solid benchmark for both investors and fund managers to measure real estate efficiencies and ESG best practices alongside financial performance. PREA is proud of our many members ranked amongst the top GRESB entities, and we fully support the industry’s sustainability efforts.Gail Haynes - CEO, PREA

The average GRESB Score of North American companies and funds improved from 54 in 2015 to 59 in 2016.

North American office portfolios continue to have the highest average GRESB Score.

GRESB includes 11 indicators addressing the engagement of property companies and funds with employees, tenants, supply chain, and community. Each circle represents a point available for these 11 indicators.

GRESB indicators can be examined individually or as functional groups to understand management and performance in key areas, such as carbon, water, waste, and health. The charts below illustrate average responses to individual carbon management indicators and the cumulative achievement of the set of carbon management strategies.

The GRESB Assessment provides data on year-over-year growth in on-site renewable energy. The dark shading indicates renewable energy generated by companies and funds based in the region. The light shading indicates renewable energy generated elsewhere in the world.

75

50

25

2016 2015

PerformanceIndicators

BuildingCertifications

Stakeholder Engagement

Management

Policy &Disclosure

Risks &Opportunities

Monitoring & EMS

77

70

64

6546

45

64

Real estate is central to the health of the North American economy, its natural environment, and its people. There is growing appreciation that the financial performance of real estate investments is intimately tied to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance.

Economically, real estate is an essential part of investment portfolios for institutional and private investors, historically providing attractive total returns and low correlations with other asset classes. Environmentally, commercial and residential real estate have significant impacts, consuming 81% of total U.S. electricity use and contributing directly to 12% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. There is also growing recognition that real estate plays a central role in shaping public health, as well as providing comfortable and productive indoor environments. Institutional investors have begun to recognize these issues as sources of value and risk. As a result, investors are increasingly requesting high quality information about the ESG performance of their investments.

GRESB meets this growing need with systematic assessment, objective

scoring, and peer benchmarking. This year’s 2016 GRESB snapshot for North America illustrates continued growth in GRESB participation with 178 companies and funds providing information about ESG performance. Entities reporting over multiple years demonstrate steady year-on-year improvements in overall ESG performance. Diving deeper, the new data show that overall performance is underpinned by increasing engagement from senior leaders, more formal policy commitments, new environmental management systems and increasingly sophisticated information systems. For example, 2016 GRESB participants provided asset-level operational performance data for more than 22,000 individual buildings worldwide, often feed directly from third-party tools.

Ultimately, these trends matter because they show that, on average, North American property companies are acting to improve ESG performance – reducing greenhouse gas emissions, saving energy, conserving water, and providing healthier indoor environments. Leading North American companies are rewarded with more efficient, more desirable properties, while their investors benefit from higher returns and lower risk.

2016 GRESB Snapshot - North America

Page 2: 2016 GRESB Snapshot - North America · New data for North American property companies and funds show significant variation in health and well-being practices. Many companies are working

© 2016 GRESB BV

Property type Entity nameRetail- Listed The Macerich Company

Retail - Private Pine Tree

Office - Listed Kilroy Realty Corporation

Office - Private MetLife/Norges Bank Investment Management Joint Venture - MetLife Investment Management

Industrial Prologis

Residential - Listed Equity Residential

Residential - Private Rose New Jersey Green Affordable Housing Preservation Fund - Jonathan Rose Companies

Residential - Private Leslie York Mills (MLYM Inc.) - The Minto Group

Residential - Private Greystar Equity Partners Fund VIII - Greystar Investment Management

Residential - Private Invesco Real Estate

Diversified Invesco Real Estate 🌐

Diversified - Retail/Office Oxford Properties Group (OMERS) - Oxford Properties Group

Diversified - Residential/Office Multi-Employer Property Trust/MEPT Edgemoor - Bentall Kennedy Group 🌐

ListedAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. � AvalonBay Fund II Communities Boston Properties �♥

Brandywine Realty Trust �♥

Brookfield Property Partners �Camden Property Trust � Corporate Office Properties Trust ♥Cousins Properties Incorporated ♥DiamondRock Hospitality Company Equity One �Equity Residential Essex Property Trust Federal Realty Investment Trust ♥First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. � Forest City Realty Trust, Inc. Franklin Street Properties General Growth Properties Government Properties Income TrustH&R Real Estate Investment TrustHCP, Inc. �Hersha Hospitality Trust � Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. ♥Kilroy Realty Corporation �♥

Kimco Realty Corporation �Laramar Multi-Family Value Fund �LaSalle Hotel PropertiesLiberty Property Trust �Monogram Residential Trust, Inc. �Paramount Group, Inc. �Parkway Properties, Inc. ♥

Post Properties, Inc. � Prologis �♥

Public Storage Regency Centers Corporation �Simon Property Group, Inc. �Taubman The Macerich Company ♥TIER REIT ♥U.S. General Services Administration ♥Ventas, Inc. �♥

Vornado Realty Trust �♥

Washington Real Estate Investment TrustWeingarten Realty Welltower, Inc. ♥

PrivateAbacus Capital Group LLC AEW Capital Management ♥Alberta Investment Management Corporation ♥American Realty Advisors Avison Young Bentall Kennedy Group �♥

BlackRock Cadillac Fairview Carr Properties CBRE Global Investors CIM Group �Clarion Partners �♥

Colony Capital, Inc. CommonWealth Partners ♥Cornerstone Real Estate Advisers

Crocker Partners LLC DDR �Deutsche Asset Management �DivcoWest �Exeter Property Group �Fairfield Residential Company LLC � Federal Capital Partners GenCap Partners Gerding Edlen Investment Management GI Partners �Greystar Investment Management Greystone Managed Investments Inc. GWL Realty Advisors ♥Harrison Street Real Estate Management, LLC Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan ♥Heitman Hermes Real Estate

Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation INP Retail, LP �♥

Invesco Real Estate �Ivanhoe Cambridge J.P. Morgan Asset Management �♥

Jamestown Properties ♥Jonathan Rose Companies KingSett Capital ♥LaSalle Investment Management MacFarlane Partners Investment Management �♥

Madison Marquette Manulife Real Estate John Hancock Real Estate

MetLife Investment Management ♥Morgan Stanley �National Real Estate Advisors LLC NBIM Normandy Real Estate Partners Oxford Properties Group �♥

Parmenter Realty Partners PGIM Real Estate �♥

Pine Tree ♥Principal Real Estate Investors � Prologis �

Rockefeller Group Investment Management Corp. RXR Realty Savanna �Scott Brown SDA Sentinel �Shorenstein Properties, LLC Stockbridge Capital Group TA Realty LLC The Blackstone Group The Minto Group TIAA TIAA-CREF �TIM ♥Time Equities, Inc Tishman Speyer �♥

Trinity Real Estate Triovest Realty Advisors Inc. ♥UBS Global Asset Management �USAA Real Estate Company �

2016 GRESB Participants - North America

GRESB Global Partners

Premier Partners - North America

Partners - North America

Sector Leaders - North America

Performance Indicators

� 5-year participant ♥ Health & Well-being Module completed

🌐 Global Sector Leader

About GRESBGRESB is an industry-driven organization committed to assessing the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of real assets globally, including real estate portfolios (public, private and direct), real estate debt portfolios, and infrastructure. More than 200 members, including 58 pension funds and their fiduciaries, use GRESB data in their investment management and engagement process, with a clear goal to optimize the risk/return profile of their investments. For more information, visit www.gresb.com.

Institutional capital represented by GRESB's 58 Investor Members$7.6 trillion

Like-For-Like Change 2014-2015 (relative) Equivalent of ChangeFootprint 2015 (absolute)

2.88%

806,456MWh

3.29%

402,253tonnesCO2

1.04% 2,367,024

m3

56,436,599MWh

74% AveragePortfolio Coverage

16,206,588tonnes CO2

80% AveragePortfolio Coverage

280,407,477m3

81% AveragePortfolio Coverage

3,419,848tonnes

67% AveragePortfolio Coverage

967,842tonnes

diverted34% Diverted fromlandfill

ENER

GY

⌁ Equivalent of 70,520 homes

CAR

BO

N E

MIS

SIO

NS

WAT

ER

💧

WA

STE

trash

Equivalent of 83,418

passenger cars

Equivalent of 9,897

Olympic pools

Equivalent of 107,000

truck loads

GRESB defines “like-for-like” as the fraction of a portfolio continuously owned by an entity for at least 24 months. Like-for-like measurements represent a relatively stable sub-set of a portfolio, and they may better reflect management action to improve performance. GRESB like-for-like metrics do not directly account for variation in weather, occupancy, and other factors.