2015-2016 LEGISLATIVE REVIEW › wp-content › ...2015-2016 LEGISLATIVE REVIEW AMERICANSFORPROSPERITY.ORG @INDIANAAFP FACEBOOK.COM/AFPIN. ... the majority of the students in the same

LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD

2015-2016 LEGISLATIVE REVIEW

AMERICANSFORPROSPERITY.ORG

@INDIANAAFP

FACEBOOK.COM/AFPIN

http://americansforprosperity.org

http://twitter.com/afp_newjersey

http://facebook.com/afpnj

Dear Concerned Taxpayer,

Our goal in producing this “Taxpayer Scorecard” is to promote ideas of economic freedom that will lead to greater prosperity for all citizens. Establishing an assessment of legislators’ performance and educating citizens, we hope to make a difference for future generations and protect these freedoms we hold so dear.

In order to have accountability, we must have an engaged citizenry. Thank you for being involved in the legislative process and taking time to better understand the issues. Together, we’ll move Indiana forward!

Best,

Justin StevensJustin Stevens, Indiana State Director

- SENATE -Senator Banks, J. ----------- 100%

Senator Schneider ---------- 90%

Senator Walker -------------- 87%

Senator Yoder --------------- 87%

Senator Delph --------------- 86%

- HOUSE -Representative Judy ------- 90%

Representative Wesco ---- 90%

Representative Culver ----- 86%

Representative Nisly ------ 83%

Representative Zent ------- 82%

Representative Morris ------ 81%

Representative Rhoads ---- 81%

CHAMPIONS OF PROSPERITY SCORECARD KEY- Pro-Economic Freedom Vote

- Anti-Economic Freedom Vote

- Excused Absence

- No Vote

- Not Legislative member at thetime of vote

✔

✘

E

NV

Top scores from each chamber

PROMOTING FREEDOM IN EDUCATIONHOUSE BILLSHB 1056: STUDENT TRANSFERSSUMMARY: Provides that a student may transfer to a school corporation if the student’s parent is an employee of the school corporation and the school corporation has the capacity to accept the student. Provides that an elementary school student who attended an accredited nonpublic elementary school in the attendance area of a school corporation in which the student does not have legal settlement may attend a high school in the school corporation if the school corporation has the capacity to accept the student and the majority of the students in the same grade as the transferring student at the accredited nonpublic school have legal settlement in the transferee school corporation.

AFP POSITION: SUPPORT

REASON: AFP Indiana supports the right of every child to attend the school of his or her family’s choice, regardless of zip code, income, or other unrelated factors to parental choice. This bill permits more educational freedom, allowing families to choose the school they deem the best fit for their child.

STATUS: Passed House 96-0; Passed Senate 50-0; Signed by Governor

PROMOTING WORKPLACE FREEDOMSENATE BILLSSB 197: CHAUFFEUR’S LICENSE EXEMPTIONSUMMARY: Authorizes an individual to transport: (1) a recreational vehicle; or (2) a towing vehicle and recreational vehicle; without a chauffeur’s license in certain circumstances.


REASON: Removes an unnecessary burden for transporting personal

property.


SB 287: MICROBREWERY BARREL LIMITSSUMMARY: Changes the amount of the barrels of beer that a microbrewery may manufacture in a calendar year for sale or distribution within Indiana from 30,000 to 60,000. Makes conforming changes to brewery provisions. Makes a technical correction.


REASON: Allows Mircobrews to expand production of their product. This allows small businesses to grow and create more jobs as well as expanding consumer choice and lowering costs.

STATUS: Passed Senate 43-7; Passed House 90-5; Signed by Governor

SB 460: COMPREHENSIVE CARE HEALTH FACILITIESSUMMARY: Prohibits the state department of health from approving: (1) the licensure of comprehensive care health facilities; (2) new or converted comprehensive care beds; or (3) the certification of new or converted comprehensive care beds for participation in the state Medicaid program; through June 30, 2018. Makes exceptions for certain facilities that are: (1) under development; (2) small house health facilities; (3) replacement facilities; (4) continuing care retirement communities; (5) facilities located in counties whose comprehensive care bed occupancy rate exceeds 90%; and (6) facilities that undergo a change of ownership for certain purposes. Limits small house comprehensive care health facilities. Prohibits the state department of health from approving: (1) the licensure of comprehensive care health facilities; (2) new or converted comprehensive care beds; or (3) the certification of new or converted comprehensive care beds for participation in the state Medicaid program; through June 30, 2018. Makes exceptions for certain facilities that are: (1) under development; (2) small house health facilities; (3) replacement facilities; (4) continuing care retirement communities; (5) facilities located in counties whose comprehensive care bed occupancy rate exceeds 90%; and (6)

BILL EXPLANATIONS2015 Votes




facilities that undergo a change of ownership for certain purposes. Limits small house facilities to 100 new licensed or Medicaid certified comprehensive care beds per year.

AFP POSITION: OPPOSE

REASON: SB 460 effectively creates a state moratorium on the construction of new nursing home facilities for seniors. This represents an unwise intrusion of government into the free market and unfairly restricts the choices available to seniors when it comes to obtaining nursing home care. This legislation would contribute to a more captive market by insulating those already in the nursing home market from potential rivals, and the market forces that come along with increased competition.

STATUS: Passed Senate 36-12; Passed House 52-40; Became Law without Signature

PROTECTING TAXPAYERSHOUSE BILLSHB 1019: COMMON CONSTRUCTION WAGESUMMARY: Repeals the common construction wage statute. Repeals related statutes superseded by the repeal of the common construction wage statute. Makes conforming amendments.


REASON: AFP Indiana supports efforts to make taxpayer-funded infrastructure projects more affordable and eliminate market-distorting wage laws that increase labor costs beyond market-based levels. This bill will save significant taxpayer dollars, allowing that money to be invested more directly into projects from which they stand to benefit.

STATUS: Passed House 54-40; Passed Senate 27-22; Signed by

Governor

SB 113: DIRECT WINE SALES

SUMMARY: Removes certain requirements for the issuance of a direct wine seller’s permit concerning: (1) filing of surety bonds or depositing cash in escrow; and (2) wine distribution through wholesalers. Removes requirements that before a direct wine seller may sell wine to a consumer: (1) the consumer must provide information in one face-to-face transaction at the seller’s place of business; or (2) under certain circumstances, the consumer must provide a verified statement that the consumer is at least 21 years of age, and the seller must provide the name and address of the consumer to the alcohol and tobacco commission. Allows a direct wine seller to sell and ship wine directly to a consumer if the consumer provides: (1) the consumer’s name; (2) a valid delivery address and telephone number; (3) proof of age by a state government issued or federal government issued identification card showing the consumer to be at least 21 years of age; and (4) a verified statement that the consumer satisfies certain requirements.


REASON: Removes burdensome and unnecessary regulations on direct wine sellers. This allows direct wine sellers to directly sell to consumers cutting costs and increasing consumer choice.

STATUS: Passed Senate; Referred to House

HB 1044: ROCKVILLE FOOD AND BEVERAGE TAXSUMMARY: Authorizes the town of Rockville to adopt a town food and beverage tax. Provides that the tax rate may not exceed 1%. Specifies the purposes for which the food and beverage tax may be used.


REASON: AFP Indiana opposes efforts to increase the burden of government on our state’s families. Rockville residents already pay enough in taxes to fund the essential services of local government. Instead of asking taxpayers for more, Rockville should seek to reform and cut spending. Food and beverage taxes are unnecessary and regressive, and the legislature should not permit them in Rockville.

STATUS: Passed House 51-44; Passed Senate 35-13; Became Law



without Signature

HB 1142: TAX ISSUESSUMMARY: Specifies that the legislative services agency (rather than the commission on state tax and financing policy or its successor committee, under current law) shall before October 1 of each year conduct the review, analysis, and evaluation of all tax incentives under House Enrolled Act 1020-2014, according to a schedule developed by the legislative services agency. Requires the legislative services agency to submit the results of the review, analysis, and evaluation to the legislative council and the interim study committee on fiscal policy. Requires the interim study committee on fiscal policy to hold an annual public hearing after September 30 and before November 1 of each year at which: (1) the legislative services agency presents its review, analysis, and evaluation of tax incentives; and (2) the interim study committee receives information concerning tax incentives. Requires the interim study committee on fiscal policy to submit to the legislative council any recommendations made by the interim study committee that are related to the legislative services agency’s review, analysis, and evaluation of tax incentives prepared under this section. Requires the legislative services agency to provide information to be used by the general assembly to make certain determinations regarding tax incentives. (Current law requires the legislative services agency to make these determinations.) Requires the legislative services agency to prepare and publish a tax expenditure report before November 1 of each even numbered year. Specifies the required elements of the tax expenditure report. Repeals the home insulation deduction and the solar powered roof vent and fan deduction.


REASON: AFP Indiana opposes all market-distorting tax incentives. They represent corporate welfare that allows government, not consumers, to pick winners and losers. This bill adds badly-needed transparency and accountability


HB 1264: LOCAL GOVERNMENT INTERNAL CONTROLS

SUMMARY: Requires the legislative body of a local government to ensure appropriate training of personnel concerning the internal control system. Requires the attorney representing a local government to annually certify that certain internal controls of the local government are in place. Specifies certain reporting and follow-up related to a report of misappropriation of local government funds. Prohibits the department of local government finance approval of a local government budget until receipt of certification that applicable training has been completed.


REASON: Providing greater transparency and financial controls on local governments is a prudent move to protect taxpayers.


HB 1270: HORSE RACING MATTERSSUMMARY: Provides that the minimum salary per diem for a member of the Indiana horse racing commission equals the maximum per diem amount that an employee of the executive branch of the federal government receives. Removes the prohibition that certain funds distributed to the horsemen’s association cannot be used for lobbying purposes. Changes the appointment process for members of breed development advisory committees and the process to appoint new members. Changes the distribution of funds to promote horses and horse racing.


REASON: The state of Indiana should not be in the business of subsidizing the horse racing industry. Moreover, dollars collected for the promotion of horse racing should never be used for lobbying purposes.

STATUS: Passed House 71-21; Passed Senate 38-12; Vetoed by Governor

HB 1273: INDIANAPOLIS SOCCER STADIUMSUMMARY: Marion County economic development. Establishes an additional professional sports development area (APSDA) in Marion



County. Requires the metropolitan development commission to establish a tax area before July 1, 2017, according to the procedures for the establishment of an economic development area. Authorizes capital improvements to be made. Provides that the APSDA may include the site or future site of a facility or complex of facilities that includes a hotel, a multipurpose stadium, and a facility used to manage and operate the professional team that would use the stadium. Requires participation in contracts for all capital improvements by minority, women and veteran owned business enterprises. Permits the adoption of a 10% Marion County admissions tax rate for any event held in the APSDA. Provides that, if adopted, the 10% admissions tax also applies until 2020 to any event held in a facility that hosts professional soccer events and that is not located in the existing professional sports development area. Allows up to $5,000,000 of state revenue to be captured each year, for 32 years, from the APSDA. Requires the owner of a professional soccer franchise that would be the primary tenant of the facility or complex of facilities constructed in the tax area, the professional soccer franchise, or the professional soccer league in which the professional soccer franchise competes (or any combination of these) to guarantee at least 50% of the amount that is financed for the facility or complex of facilities that includes a soccer stadium. Provides that if the capital improvement board, the county convention and recreational facilities authority, and one more sublessees have entered into an agreement concerning a capital improvement in the APSDA: (1) the metropolitan development commission shall expand a tax increment financing allocation area in Marion County; and (2) subject to the policies and guidelines governing the metropolitan development commission, deposit at least $10,000,000 from property taxes allocated to the commission into a neighborhood stabilization fund during the 20 years after the parties enter into the agreement. Specifies the purposes for which these revenues may be used and the area in which these revenues may be used. Provides that upon approval by the legislative body of a county containing a consolidated city, the county executive may submit an application to the budget committee for review and recommendation to the budget agency, requesting the designation by the budget agency of the White River revitalization district. Provides that: (1) the income tax increment and the sales tax increment for a district shall be

deposited during each state fiscal year into a state incremental tax financing fund established for the district; and (2) this incremental tax revenue shall be distributed to the county for use within the district for specified purposes. Provides that not more than $5,000,000 in tax revenues may be captured by the district over the life of the district.


REASON: Without any independent study or analysis, supporters of an Indianapolis soccer stadium are seeking to retain tax dollars generated at their place of business for the purposes of financing the construction of a new stadium. Without any guarantee of future revenue, taxpayers are the ones who seem to ultimately hold the risk of this venture. In a free market, consumers (taxpayers) should be the ones making the decision on what is essential to their community

STATUS: Passed House 73-22; Passed Senate with Amendments; Dissented in House

HB 1349: VARIOUS TAX MATTERSSUMMARY: Eliminates the double direct test for the gross retail tax exemption for various transactions involving various types of tangible personal property. Specifies that the exemption applies if the tangible personal property is acquired for direct use or consumption in the production of tangible personal property when the person acquiring the property is occupationally engaged in the business of producing tangible personal property. Eliminates various adjustments to income for purposes of determining Indiana adjusted gross income. Eliminates various income tax exemptions, deductions, and credits.


REASON: Reduces the complexity in the tax code by removing tax credits which ultimately benefit a small number of people at the cost of others. AFP-IN supports a simpler tax code with lower rates for a broader base of taxpayers.

STATUS: Passed House 68-26; Passed Senate 50-0; Dissented in House



HB 1351: RESTRICTIONS ON RULEMAKINGSUMMARY: Voids state administrative rules, guidelines, and other policies or standards that are not specifically authorized by state statute or do not implement a federal requirement. Establishes the office of regulatory accountability in the legislative services agency to review administrative rules for compliance with regulatory goals specified by the general assembly.


REASON: This is an important measure to protect Indiana taxpayers from excessive regulatory rulemaking.

STATUS: Passed House 78-18; Died in Senate

HB 1481: PUBLIC RETIREMENT PLANSSUMMARY: Provides that after December 31, 2015, an eligible employee of the state becomes a member of the public employees’ defined contribution plan. Provides that an eligible employee of a political subdivision that participates in the plan becomes a member of the plan. Provides that after December 31, 2015, a political subdivision may not begin or expand participation in the public employees’ retirement fund. Provides that the employer of an individual who is a member of the plan shall match the individual’s contribution to the plan to a limit of 7.5% of the individual’s compensation. Grants cost of living adjustments in 2015 and 2016 for certain members of the: (1) public employees’ retirement fund; (2) Indiana state teachers’ retirement fund; (3) state police pre-1987 benefit system; and (4) state police 1987 benefit system.


REASON: State pensions are a huge liability for taxpayers. HB 1481 makes reforms that will reduce the burden for Hoosier taxpayers.

STATUS: Passed House 95-0; Died in Senate

SENATE BILLS

SB 252: USE OF BREED DEVELOPMENT FUNDS TO PROMOTE HORSE RACINGSUMMARY: Requires the Indiana horse racing commission (IHRC) to promote the horse racing industry in Indiana. Provides that promotional costs may be paid from the breed development funds. Increases the amount of money in the breed development funds that may be used for IHRC expenses from 2% to 4%. Provides that not more than 50% of that amount may be used to pay costs incurred to promote the Indiana horse racing industry. Requires the IHRC to annually report and account for its promotional actions and expenditures.


REASON: Requires the Indiana horse racing commission (IHRC) to promote the horse racing industry in Indiana. Provides that promotional costs may be paid from the breed development funds. Increases the amount of money in the breed development funds that may be used for IHRC expenses from 2% to 4%. Provides that not more than 50% of that amount may be used to pay costs incurred to promote the Indiana horse racing industry. Requires the IHRC to annually report and account for its promotional actions and expenditures.

STATUS: Passed Senate 39-10; Passed House 91-6; Became Law without Signature

SB 379: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATIONSSUMMARY: Allows the legislative body of Monroe County and the Bloomington public transportation corporation to expand the corporation’s service area to include the entire county by adopting substantially identical ordinances. Allows the fiscal body of Monroe County to adopt an ordinance to impose a county economic development income tax rate to fund the expansion. Provides that the rate must be at least 0.1% but not more than 0.25%.


REASON: This bill would increase taxes on hard working families who



are still struggling to recover from the economic recession.

STATUS: Passed Senate 41-9; Died in House

SB 436: STATE AND LOCAL TAXATIONSUMMARY: Provides that if a taxpayer has personal property subject to assessment in more than one township in a county or has personal property that is subject to assessment and that is located in two or more taxing districts within the same township, the taxpayer shall file a single tax return with the county assessor. Provides a property tax exemption for taxpayers with less than $20,000 of total business personal property in a county. Removes the requirement in current law that such an exemption is effective in a county only if adopted by the county income tax council. Provides that the 30% valuation floor does not apply to Pool 3 equipment and Pool 4 equipment for property tax assessment purposes.


REASON: Simplifies the tax system for personal property decreasing compliance costs for taxpayers. Furthermore, it essentially eliminates the personal property tax for those with less than $20,000 of total business personal property.


SB 441: ELIMINATES CERTAIN TAX DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITSSUMMARY: Eliminates the World War I veteran property tax deduction for property taxes imposed for an assessment date after 2015. Eliminates the enterprise zone investment deduction for qualified investments made after May 1, 2016. Eliminates the double direct test for the gross retail tax exemption for various transactions involving various types of tangible personal property. Specifies that the exemption applies if the tangible personal property is acquired for direct use or consumption in the production of tangible personal property when the person acquiring the property is occupationally engaged in the business of producing tangible personal property. Eliminates various add backs for purposes of determining Indiana adjusted gross income. Provides that business income is all income apportionable to the state under the Constitution of the United

States. Eliminates various income tax deductions and exemptions. Broadens the add back to Indiana adjusted gross income related to intercompany interest expenses. Eliminates various income tax credits. Provides for a tax amnesty program. Makes technical corrections and conforming amendments.


REASON: Eliminates a number of unneeded and costly tax credits. This will save taxpayers money and see that funds are spent on projects for the general good as opposed to special interests.


SB 478: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION FUNDSUMMARY: Transportation funding. Provides that a redevelopment commission of a municipality may provide revenue to a public transportation corporation from property tax proceeds allocated to the redevelopment commission in a tax increment financing area.


REASON: Would allow property tax proceeds may be provided to “a public transportation corporation fund” as opposed to funding the fund through transportation related revenue.


SB 492: VARIOUS PENSION MATTERSSUMMARY: Provides that an individual who is a first time full-time employee of the state or a participating political subdivision after June 30, 2015, becomes a member of the public employees’ defined contribution plan unless the individual makes an explicit election to become a member of the public employees’ retirement fund (PERF). (This reverses the presumption under current law) Provides that a political subdivision may participate in the public employees’ defined contribution plan.


REASON: Correctly places first-time public employees into a defined contribution plan unless they express otherwise. This practice will



save taxpayer dollars.


PROMOTING FREEDOM IN EDUCATIONHOUSE BILLSHB 1005: EDUCATION MATTERSSUMMARY: Specifies that if a choice scholarship student changes schools during the school year after the December 1 count of special education pupils, any choice scholarship amounts paid to the choice scholarship student for the remainder of the school year after the choice scholarship student enrolls in a different eligible school shall not include amounts that a school corporation would receive as a special education grant for the choice scholarship student. Removes a provision that provides that if the eligible choice scholarship student leaves the eligible school for which the eligible choice scholarship student was awarded a choice scholarship and enrolls in another eligible school, the eligible choice scholarship student is responsible for the payment of any tuition required for the remainder of that school year. Provides that the department shall accept applications for choice scholarship students from September 2 through January 15 for the spring semester of the current school year.


REASON: AFP Indiana is committed to giving students and their parents more educational options. This bill provides additional flexibility for students and parents using the Choice scholarship by allowing students to receive vouchers for the first time in the 2nd semester.


SENATE BILLSSB 334: CHOICE SCHOLARSHIPS

SUMMARY: Specifies that if a choice scholarship student changes schools during the school year after the December 1 count of special education pupils, any choice scholarship amounts paid to the choice scholarship student for the remainder of the school year after the choice scholarship student enrolls in a different eligible school shall not include amounts that a school corporation would receive as a special education grant for the choice scholarship student. Removes a provision that provides that if the eligible choice scholarship student leaves the eligible school for which the eligible choice scholarship student was awarded a choice scholarship and enrolls in another eligible school, the eligible choice scholarship student is responsible for the payment of any tuition required for the remainder of that school year. Provides that the department of education shall accept applications for choice scholarship students from September 2 through January 15 for the spring semester of the current school year.


REASON: AFP Indiana is committed to giving students and their parents more educational options. This bill provides additional flexibility for students and parents using the Choice scholarship by allowing students to receive vouchers for the first time in the 2nd semester.

STATUS: Passed Senate 40-9; Passed House 60-33; Added to HB 1005

PROMOTING WORKPLACE FREEDOMHOUSE BILLSHB 1053: REGULATION OF PACKAGING MATERIALSSUMMARY: Amends the home rule statute to prohibit a local government unit from: (1) regulating: (A) certain activities with respect to reusable or disposable auxiliary containers designed for one time use or for transporting merchandise or food from food or retail facilities; or (B) a manufacturer of, a distributor of, or a food or retail facility that sells, provides, or otherwise makes use of, auxiliary containers, in connection with certain activities involving



auxiliary containers; or (2) imposing any prohibition, restriction, fee, or tax with respect to auxiliary containers or to a manufacturer of, a distributor of, or a food or retail facility that sells, provides, or otherwise makes use of, auxiliary containers, in connection with certain activities involving auxiliary containers.


REASON: Bans, taxes, and fees on auxiliary containers (such as takeout containers and plastic bags) drive up the costs for consumers when they purchase merchandise and food from retailers. Low-income consumers especially cannot afford increased food and retail costs.


HB 1082: ENVIRONMENTAL RULES AND STANDARDSSUMMARY: Prohibits the environmental rules board from adopting a rule or standard that is more stringent than the corresponding regulation or standard established under federal law.


REASON: Indiana has no reason to create environmental rules or standards that are even more stringent than the federal EPA. Federal EPA standards are already too strict and have economic costs greater than their environmental benefit.

STATUS: Passed House 64-33; Passed Senate 48-2; Vetoed by Governor

HB 1169: BUSINESS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONSUMMARY: Replaces the requirement that a taxpayer that is eligible for the business personal property tax exemption submit to the county assessor a notarized statement each year affirming the taxpayer’s eligibility for the exemption, subject to penalties for perjury, with a requirement that the taxpayer indicate on the taxpayer’s personal property return that the taxpayer is eligible for the exemption for the assessment date. Reduces the maximum local service fee that may be imposed on a taxpayer each year that qualifies for the exemption from $50 per year to $25 per year. Eliminates the $25 penalty applicable to a taxpayer that fails to file a notarized statement

with the county assessor affirming the taxpayer’s eligibility for the exemption. Changes the basis for valuing personal property for the exemption from acquisition cost to assessed value.


REASON: AFP Indiana supports reducing undue burden on taxpayers through cumbersome requirements and fees.


HB 1263: TELEMEDICINESUMMARY: Requires the secretary of family and social services to provide information concerning the Medicaid program, the healthy Indiana plan, and the children’s health insurance program to the legislative services agency upon request for the purposes of doing analysis related to those programs. Sets forth requirements that must be met before: (1) a physician; (2) a physician assistant; (3) an advanced practice nurse; or (4) an optometrist; with prescriptive authority may issue a prescription to a patient receiving telemedicine services. Provides that certain drugs and devices may not be prescribed through the use of telemedicine. Specifies jurisdiction for out-of-state providers providing health care services to patients located in Indiana through the use of telemedicine and requires these providers and entities that employ or contract with these providers to certify certain information with the Indiana professional licensing agency.


REASON: AFP Indiana supports increasing consumer choice through the use of telemedicine.


PROTECTING TAXPAYERSHOUSE BILLSHB 1001: ROAD FUNDING



SUMMARY: Provides that a county may impose the county motor vehicle license excise surtax and the county wheel tax at higher rates if the county uses a transportation asset management plan approved by the department. Authorizes an eligible municipality to impose a municipal motor vehicle excise surtax and a municipal wheel tax. Increases the gasoline tax from the current rate of 18 cents per gallon to an indexed rate to be determined by the department of revenue. Increases the special fuel tax from the current rate of 16 cents per gallon to an indexed rate to be determined by the department of revenue. Increases the motor carrier surcharge tax from the current rate of 11 cents per gallon to an indexed rate to be determined by the department of revenue. Increases the cigarette tax to $1.995 per pack and uses the additional revenue for reimbursements of Medicaid providers. Requires a person who registers an electric vehicle to pay a supplemental registration fee of $100. Makes appropriations for various highway and bridge maintenance purposes.


REASON: AFP Indiana opposes this bill because it increases the burden for Hoosier taxpayers. Prioritizing spending should be the focus of the legislature through the regular budget process. The tax increases included in this bill far outweigh the promised cuts that would be enacted over the next decade.

STATUS: Passed House 61-36; Passed Senate w/ Amendments; Signed by Governor

SENATE BILLS

SB 15: FRESH FOOD INITIATIVESUMMARY: Establishes the food desert grant and loan program within the state department of health’s division of nutrition and physical activity to assist new businesses, existing businesses, and other legal entities to offer fresh and unprocessed foods within a food desert. Defines “food desert”. Requires the division to establish: (1) criteria for awarding grants and making loans under the program; and (2) terms and conditions for recipients of the grants and loans. Provides that the recipient of a grant or loan: (1) may use the proceeds only

to acquire, repair, or renovate property or equipment to be used in offering fresh and unprocessed foods within a food desert; and (2) shall not use the proceeds to acquire food to be sold. Establishes the food deserts fund for purposes of awarding grants and loans under the program.


REASON: AFP Indiana opposes government loan programs. These programs may have good intentions, but often have poor results. Failed loan programs end up being direct expenditures and often cronyism influences who receives financing.


SB 126: POLITICAL SUBDIVISION INFORMATION ON THE INTERNETSUMMARY: Requires local governments and school corporations to provide information for posting on the Indiana transparency Internet web site as follows: (1) Expenditures categorized by personal services, other operating expenses or total operating expenses, and debt service, including lease payments, related to debt. (2) A listing of fund balances, specifically identifying balances in funds that are being used for accumulation of money for future capital needs. Requires the department of local government finance after July 31, 2017, to publish an annual financial and operational summary of each political subdivision on the transparency web site.


REASON: Provides additional transparency for taxpayers, creating a more direct way to evaluate expenditures of local governments and school corporations.


SB 128: MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT FUNDINGSUMMARY: Allows the fiscal body of Monroe County to adopt an ordinance to impose an additional local income tax rate to fund one or more county transit projects. Provides that the rate must be at least 0.1% but not more than 0.25%.




REASON: AFP Indiana opposes a potential $7 million tax increase on Monroe County families.


SB 165: HEALTHY INDIANA PLANSUMMARY: Repeals the prior healthy Indiana plan statutes and makes revisions to the currently operating healthy Indiana plan. Repeals statutes governing the high risk Indiana check-up plan.


REASON: This bill codifies Medicaid expansion, a significant burden to taxpayers which consumes a large portion of our state budget.


SB 327: TRANSPARENCY PORTALSUMMARY: Allows the fiscal body of Monroe County to adopt an ordinance to impose an additional local income tax rate to fund one or more county transit projects. Provides that the rate must be at least 0.1% but not more than 0.25%.


REASON: AFP Indiana opposes a potential $7 million tax increase on Monroe County families.


SB 333: ROAD FUNDING AND REGIONAL CITIESSUMMARY: Provides that a county may impose the county motor vehicle license excise surtax and the county wheel tax at higher rates if the county uses a transportation asset management plan approved by the department. Authorizes an eligible municipality to impose a municipal motor vehicle excise surtax and a municipal wheel tax. Increases the gasoline tax from the current rate of 18 cents per gallon to an indexed rate to be determined by the department

of revenue. Increases the special fuel tax from the current rate of 16 cents per gallon to an indexed rate to be determined by the department of revenue. Increases the motor carrier surcharge tax from the current rate of 11 cents per gallon to an indexed rate to be determined by the department of revenue. Increases the cigarette tax to $1.995 per pack and uses the additional revenue for reimbursements of Medicaid providers. Requires a person who registers an electric vehicle to pay a supplemental registration fee of $100. Appropriates $42,000,000 from the Indiana regional cities development fund for the purpose of funding a third grant under the regional cities initiative.


REASON: AFP Indiana opposes this bill because it increases the burden for Hoosier taxpayers. Prioritizing spending should be the focus of the legislature through the regular budget process. The tax increases included in this bill far outweigh the promised cuts that would be enacted over the next decade.

STATUS: Passed House 57-35; Senate dissented from House amendments

LEGISLATIVE VOTES : MEMBERS OF THE SENATE

SENATORDi

stric

t

Scor

e

SB 8

0

SB 25

2

SB 4

41

SB 4

78

HB 10

19

SB 11

3

HB 10

44

HB 10

56

HB 10

65

HB 11

42

HB 12

70

SB 19

7

SB 29

7

SB 4

36

SB 4

60

HB 12

64

HB 13

49

SB 37

9

SB 4

92

SB 15

SB 12

6

SB 12

8

SB 16

5

SB 32

7

SB 33

4

HB 10

05

HB 10

53

HB 10

82

HB 11

69

HB 12

63

Alting 22 63% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Arnold 8 60% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Banks, J 17 100% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Bassler 38 67% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Becker 50 53% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Boots 23 63% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Bray 37 73% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Breaux 34 50% ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Broden 10 57% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Brown 15 80% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Buck 21 70% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Charbonneau 5 63% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Crider 28 63% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Delph 29 86% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Eckerty 26 73% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Ford 39 67% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Glick 13 67% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Grooms 46 67% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Head 18 60% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Hershman 7 70% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Holdman 19 77% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Houchin 47 83% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Kenley 20 71% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ NV ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Kruse 14 73% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Lanane 25 50% ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

NV=Not Voting, E=ExcusedNV & E are not counted in the scorecard

LEGISLATIVE VOTES : MEMBERS OF THE SENATE

SENATORDi

stric

t

Scor

e

SB 8

0

SB 25

2

SB 4

41

SB 4

78

SB 10

19

SB 11

3

SB 10

44

SB 10

56

SB 10

65

SB 11

42

SB 12

70

SB 19

7

SB 29

7

SB 4

36

SB 4

60

SB 12

64

SB 13

49

SB 37

9

SB 4

92

SB 15

SB 12

6

SB 12

8

SB 16

5

SB 32

7

SB 33

4

SB 10

05

SB 10

53

SB 10

82

SB 11

69

SB 12

63

Leising 42 67% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Long 16 70% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Merritt 31 73% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Messmer 48 75% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ NV ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Miller, Pat 32 73% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Miller, Pete 24 73% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Mishler 9 66% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Mrvan 1 52% ✔ E E ✘ ✘ ✘ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ E ✘ E ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘

Niemeyer 6 73% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Perfect 43 80% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Raatz 27 70% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Randolph 2 47% NV ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ NV E ✔ ✘ ✔ E E ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Rogers 3 57% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Schneider 30 90% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Smith 45 83% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Steele 44 67% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Stoops 40 41% ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ NV

Tallian 4 47% ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Taylor 33 47% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ NV ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔

Tomes 49 67% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Walker 41 87% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Waltz 36 70% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Yoder 12 87% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Young 35 80% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Zakas 11 73% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

NV=Not Voting, E=ExcusedNV & E are not counted in the scorecard

REP.Di

stric

t

Scor

e

HB 8

0

HB 11

3

HB 25

2

HB 4

41

HB 19

7

HB 29

7

HB 4

36

HB 4

60

HB 10

19

HB 10

44

HB 10

56

HB 10

65

HB 11

42

HB 12

70

HB 12

73

HB 12

64

HB 13

49

HB 13

51

HB 14

81

HB 15

HB 12

6

HB 16

5

HB 32

7

HB 33

3

HB 10

01

HB 10

05

HB 10

53

HB 10

82

HB 11

69

HB 12

63

Arnold 74 63% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Austin 36 60% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Aylesworth 11 61% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔

Bacon 75 66% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E

Baird 44 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Bartlett 95 71% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✘ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Bauer 6 66% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Behning 91 71% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E

Beumer 33 60% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔

Borders 45 77% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Bosma 88 NA NV NV NV ✔ NV NV NV NV ✔ NV NV NV NV ✔ NV NV NV NV ✔ NV ✔ ✘ NV ✘ ✘ ✔ NV NV NV ✔

Braun 63 80% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Brown, C. 3 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ E

Brown, T. 41 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E E ✔ E ✔ ✘ NV E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ E

Burton 58 75% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ E ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Carbaugh 81 77% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Cherry 53 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✘ E E E ✔ E E E ✔

Clere 72 80% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Cook 32 63% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Cox 85 73% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Culver 49 86% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E

Davisson 73 77% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

DeLaney 86 60% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Dermody 20 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

DeVon 5 72% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E

LEGISLATIVE VOTES : MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE NV=Not Voting, E=ExcusedNV & E are not counted in the scorecard

REP.Di

stric

t

Scor

e

SB 8

0

SB 11

3

SB 25

2

SB 4

41

SB 19

7

SB 29

7

SB 4

36

SB 4

60

HB 10

19

HB 10

44

HB 10

56

HB 10

65

HB 11

42

HB 12

70

HB 12

73

HB 12

64

HB 13

49

HB 13

51

HB 14

81

SB 15

SB 12

6

SB 16

5

SB 32

7

SB 33

3

HB 10

01

HB 10

05

HB 10

53

HB 10

82

HB 11

69

HB 12

63

Dvorak 8 64% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Eberhart 57 59% ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ E ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Ellington 62 64% ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Errington 34 59% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ E

Fine 12 68% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Forestal 100 66% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Friend 23 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Frizzell 93 78% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ E

Frye 67 76% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

GiaQuinta 80 63% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Goodin 66 77% ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Gutwein 16 71% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Hale 87 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Hamm 56 71% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ E ✔ ✘ E ✔ ✔

Harman 17 72% ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔

Harris 2 68% NV ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ E E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✔ E ✘ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Heaton 46 73% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Huston 37 79% ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Judy 83 90% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Karickhoff 30 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Kersey 43 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Kirchhofer 89 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Klinker 27 68% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ E

Koch 65 73% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Lawson 1 57% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ NV ✘ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔


REP.Di

stric

t

Scor

e

SB 8

0

SB 11

3

SB 25

2

SB 4

41

SB 19

7

SB 29

7

SB 4

36

SB 4

60

HB 10

19

HB 10

44

HB 10

56

HB 10

65

HB 11

42

HB 12

70

HB 12

73

HB 12

64

HB 13

49

HB 13

51

HB 14

81

SB 15

SB 12

6

SB 16

5

SB 32

7

SB 33

3

HB 10

01

HB 10

05

HB 10

53

HB 10

82

HB 11

69

HB 12

63

Lehe 25 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Lehman 79 66% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Leonard 50 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Lucas 69 77% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Lyness 68 64% ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Macer 92 71% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Mahan 31 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Mayfield 48 73% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

McNamara 60 69% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Miller 76 79% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Moed 97 63% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Morris 84 81% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔

Morrison 42 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Moseley 10 73% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Negele 13 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Niezgodski 7 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Nisly 22 83% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Ober 82 77% ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Olthoff 19 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔

Pelath 9 64% NV ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Pierce 61 57% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Porter 96 62% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Price 47 72% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Pryor 94 60% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Rhoads 70 81% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E


REP.Di

stric

t

Scor

e

SB 8

0

SB 11

3

SB 25

2

SB 4

41

SB 19

7

SB 29

7

SB 4

36

SB 4

60

HB 10

19

HB 10

44

HB 10

56

HB 10

65

HB 11

42

HB 12

70

HB 12

73

HB 12

64

HB 13

49

HB 13

51

HB 14

81

SB 15

SB 12

6

SB 16

5

SB 32

7

SB 33

3

HB 10

01

HB 10

05

HB 10

53

HB 10

82

HB 11

69

HB 12

63

Richardson 29 72% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Riecken 77 79% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E E ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔

Saunders 54 62% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔

Schaibley 24 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔

Shackleford 98 59% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ E

Slager 15 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔

Smaltz 52 76% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Smith, M. 14 75% ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ E ✔ E ✔

Smith, V. 59 69% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ E ✔ E ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ E

Soliday 4 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Speedy 90 77% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Stemler 71 72% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ E ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

Steuerwald 40 69% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Sullivan 78 77% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Summers 99 61% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✘ ✘ E ✘ NV ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ E E

Thompson 28 77% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Torr 39 72% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ NV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Truitt 26 63% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔

VanNatter 38 79% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Washburne 64 79% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Wesco 21 90% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Wolkins 18 74% E ✘ ✔ E E E E E E ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ E ✔ E E E ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Wright 35 67% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔

Zent 51 82% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ E

Ziemke 55 70% ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔



@INDIANAAFP

FACEBOOK.COM/AFPIN

http://twitter.com/afp_newjersey

http://facebook.com/afpnj

Documents

2015-2016 LEGISLATIVE REVIEW › wp-content › ...2015-2016 LEGISLATIVE REVIEW AMERICANSFORPROSPERITY.ORG @INDIANAAFP FACEBOOK.COM/AFPIN. ... the majority of the students in the same