WELCOME!

Science and Traditional Ecological KnowledgeEcological Knowledge (S‐TEK) working group webinar

August 13 2014August 13, 2014

For technical questions, contact Bridger Wineman (bwineman@enviroissues.com or call mobile: 503.267.9688)

Adobe Connect webinar tips

(Screen shot of adobe connect with circle for raise h d d h f i )

Click here to “raise your hand”your hand and chat functions)raise your hand

Type commentsType comments here

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

Today’s agenda topics3

C itt d t Committee updates

Long list review Long list review

Prioritization criteria

Impact matrix exercise

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/20148/13/2014GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group

Committee updatesp

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

TEK guiding principle/LCC goal5

Support the  Objective: Encourage dialogue on shared ppexchange of western and 

conservation goals between indigenous communities, local peoples and other practitioners, informed by best practices 

traditional science to further basin 

p , y pfor considering traditional knowledges.

Obj ti D l d l fconservation priorities and 

Objective: Develop models for engagement of tribal membership and traditional practitioners of TEK.p

directly benefit tribal issues and  Objective: Apply Protocols to ensure 

protection of TEK and strategies to protectcircumstances. 

protection of TEK and strategies to protect treaty rights and trust resources.

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/20148/13/2014GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group

Call for volunteers‐ proposal review 6

CategoryNumber of proposals

V t ti 17Vegetation 17Other (unique proposals, some may be beyond our scope) 9Sage grouse and other birds 6g gMultiple Categories 5TEK 4Mammals 4Fi 3Fire 3Grazing 2

•Review period closes on August 29th.Review period closes on August 29 .•TEK reviewer conference call on Thursday Aug. 14th from 2:00 to 3:00pm (Pacific Time).•Results conference calls (not mandatory):( y)

•Science Review Panel – Tuesday, Sept. 2 from 11:00 am to 12:30 pm (Pacific Time)•TEK Review Panel – Thursday, Sept. 4 from 3:00 to 4:30 pm (Pacific Time)

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/20148/13/2014GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group

Long list reviewg

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

Prioritization criteria

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

NP LCC impact matrix criteria9

Th d t hi h i f ti t The degree to which information or support related to a topic is needed to support natural 

t d i i i th LCCresource management decisions in the LCC The magnitude or importance of the effect of the 

driver on the resource The level of uncertainty about those impacts The necessity and ability of resource 

management agencies to mitigate, adapt, ormanagement agencies to mitigate, adapt, or respond to the anticipated changes

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/20148/13/2014GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group

Impact matrixp

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

h f d l h

Low scores are RED, high scores are GREENImpact matrix example

Primary Climate Drivers Secondary Climate Drivers

North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative Climate Change Impact Matrix

ic Compo

sition

atu

re

on

ndition

ough

ts

Regim

e

rrents

ter Q

uality

er Quali

ty

ss B

alanc

eic

Change

Diseas

e, Pests

me

Valued natural and cultural resources Atm

osph

eric

Air tem

perat

Precipi

tation

Sea Le

vel

Storms

Ocean

Con

dFloo

ds/D

roug

Hydrol

ogic R

Marine

Curr

eMari

ne W

ateFresh

Wate

rGlac

ier M

ass

Geomorp

hicInva

sives

, DFire

Reg

ime

Pheno

logy

TotalValued natural and cultural resourcesHabitats Forest 2 9 11 0 2 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 4 12

Alpine 1 6 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 6Lowlands 0 3 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 4

Islands 0 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5Islands 0 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5Riparian 1 3 5 1 0 0 7 9 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 9

Lake/Wetland 1 6 6 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 6River/Stream 1 7 7 0 1 0 8 15 0 0 9 3 6 1 2 1 15

Marine Shoreline 0 1 0 12 6 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 12Marine Nearshore 0 1 1 7 4 3 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 7

Estuaries 1 0 3 12 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 1 5 0 0 0 12G d t 0 1 5 1 0 0 4 10 0 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 10Groundwater 0 1 5 1 0 0 4 10 0 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 10

SpeciesMammals 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 5PopulationsMammals 0 5 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 5

Seabirds 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3Land/water birds 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3

Anadromous Fish 1 3 2 1 1 4 5 12 3 4 10 0 1 1 2 0 12Forage fish 0 0 0 3 1 3 0 2 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 3

Ground/rockfish 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2Herps 0 2 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 3

Shellfish/Invertebrates 0 1 1 3 1 6 0 1 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 6Epiphytes 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Othermmunities 2 8 5 3 1 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 3 6 8Food Webs/Productivity 2 5 5 2 2 4 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 6 1 4 6

Connectivity 1 5 4 2 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 5Connectivity 1 5 4 2 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 5Carbon Storage 2 3 3 1 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 6 0 6

Traditional Resources 2 4 5 5 1 2 2 4 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 2 5Sites 1 2 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 6

Total 2 9 11 12 6 6 8 15 4 4 10 4 6 11 12 6Courtesy North Pacific LCC

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

Impact pmatrix results 

(“short list”)(“short list”)RED h t t l i tRED, shows total points, BLUE shows scoring participation

Courtesy North Pacific LCC

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

y

13

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/20148/13/2014GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group

Next steps: S‐TEK member tasks14

Complete impact matrix exercise N t bi S t 19 i i Next webinar: Sept. 19, review exercise 

results and identify our “short list” 

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/20148/13/2014GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group

15

S‐TEK Strategy process overviewgy pInventory and “Long list” of LCC‐wide needs

Ph 1

“Sh li ” Evaluation

Science needs Management needsPhase 1

Ph 2 “Short list”Science 

Evaluation criteria and 

balancing factors

Phase 2

priorities

Guiding gPrinciplesPhase 3

S‐TEK Strategic Plan Future Implementation

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

Phase 2: prioritization17

“Impacts Matrix” exercise:Identify important topics for NPLCC to address (criteria

Change agents/drivers

Identify important topics for NPLCC to address (criteria focused on resource management relevance)“Long list” of 

needs g g /

esd resourc

“Short list”

Valued

“ h ”“Short List”:Top Ranked Driver‐ Resource Pairs

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/20148/13/2014GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group

Phase 3: determine priority topics S‐TEK Working Group 

p y p

“ h li ” evaluates all pairs using criteria/balancing f t

“Short list”

factors

Topic DTopic CTopic BTopic A

Science

Topic X

Topic DScience priorities

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Topic X

Priority Score

GBLCC S‐TEK Working Group 8/13/2014

y