Upload
emile
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2012 Student Achievement Report. Board of Education Meeting October 25, 2012. Format and Purpose of the Report. Evaluate learning in: Communication Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies Integrate results of multiple assessments Look at achievement by content and grade span, not test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
2012Student Achievement Report
Board of Education MeetingOctober 25, 2012
Format and Purpose of the Report
Evaluate learning in: Communication Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies
Integrate results of multiple assessments
Look at achievement by content and grade span, not test
Answer the following questions: How much growth are students making? (Value-Added) How high is student achievement? (Comparisons) What is the trend in student achievement? (Trend)
Elementary School Middle School High School
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120123456789
101112131415
Average Above AverageBelow Average
What is Value-Added?
Grade
Grad
e Eq
uiva
lent
1 grade equivalent of growth for every year in school
1.2 grade equivalents of growth for every year in school
0.8 grade equivalents of growth for every year in school
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12404550556065707580
Average Above Average
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Grade
What is Value-Added?
Explanation of Comparisons
Park H
ill
Platte
County
Ray-P
ec
Libert
y
Lees
Sum
mit
Blue S
pring
s
Parkway
Mehlvi
lle
Wen
tzville
55.0
57.0
59.0
61.0
63.0
65.0
67.0
Park H
ill
Platte
County
Ray-P
ec
Libert
y
Lees
Sum
mit
Blue S
pring
s
Parkway
Mehlvi
lle
Wen
tzville
55.0
57.0
59.0
61.0
63.0
65.0
67.0
Park H
ill
Platte
County
Ray-P
ec
Libert
y
Lees
Sum
mit
Blue S
pring
s
Parkway
Mehlvi
lle
Wen
tzville
55.0
57.0
59.0
61.0
63.0
65.0
67.0
LowMiddle
High
How are trends evaluated?
Use at least 3 data points
Identify source of variation: Cohort differences Changes to the test Normal measurement error Student population shifts Instructional changes
Achievement at a Glance
VACT-Based Analysis by Content Area and Grade Span
Primary Intermediate Middle School High School
VA C T VA C T VA C T VA C TCommunication Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
66% 62% 48% 51% 70% 73% 80% 19% 36% 52% 44% 30% 25% 18% 14% 2% 0% 5% 0% 2% 2%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201220
30
40
50
60
70
80
Comm Arts
Comm Arts Achievement at a Glance
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201220
30
40
50
60
70
80
Math
Math Achievement at a Glance
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201220
30
40
50
60
70
80
Comm Arts Math State
Achievement at a Glance
Park Hill Implications…
If an average student (50th percentile) started in Park Hill in Kindergarten and achieved the average growth for Park Hill students in 2012, what percentile would they end up in when they finished high school?
Pre K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2 Mathematics Communication ArtsHigh SchoolPrimary Intermediate Middle School
Growth by Grade Span – 201293rd percentile
89th percentile
Expected Growth z = 0.050th percentile
Pre K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2 Mathematics Communication ArtsHigh SchoolPrimary Intermediate Middle School
Statistically, what should we expect?
Pre K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1145
55
65
75
85
95
2011-2012
Expected Growth 50th Percentile
Overall Growth 91st percentile
1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 7 Years 9 Years 11 Years
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95C
orre
spon
ding
Per
cent
ile R
ank
Benefit of Staying in Park Hill
Opportunities for Improvement
• Transition successfully into MSIP 5
• Continue enhancing assessment plan to have data in Science, Social Studies, and early grades
• Although 2012 showed better growth results for Middle Level, greater growth at Middle Level is still desired
Establishing a culture of all-time-bests 19 assessment scores were best ever
Primary – 5 Intermediate – 3 Middle school – 8 High school – 3 2nd grade and 7th grade – highest
scores ever in every subject!
31 assessment scores were top 2 scores historically
Park Hill Achieves 19 All-Time Bests!
Park Hill Achieves 17 Personal Bests!In Addition
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Comm. Arts 4th 1st 2nd 1st 4th
Mathematics 3rd 1st 1st 1st 1st
Science 3rd 1st 1st 1st 1st
End-of-Course Exam Comparative Rank
New Comparison Group
CSIP Goal A1.1 Objective: Improve MAP scores
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
55
60
65
70
75
80
Park HillGoal
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
CSIP Goal A1.2 Objective: Improve MAP score for specific groups
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Park HillGoal
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Gender Comparisons
3 4 5 6 7 8 HS0
0.20.40.60.8
1Communication Arts
3 4 5 6 7 8 HS
MathematicsMale Female
5 8 HS0
0.20.40.60.8
1Science
CSIP Goal A2 Objective: Educational Relevancy
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-201350
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
FallSpringGoal
Perc
ent S
tron
gly
Agr
ee o
r A
gree
Plans for Improvement• Curriculum aligned with Common Core,
increasing rigor– Increased text complexity– Algebra earlier– Focus on academic vocabulary
• Instructional Frameworks Implemented– Reader’s and Writer’s workshop– Mathematics
• Focus on 21st century skills– FLiP– Training for teachers and administrators
• Integrated At-Risk Supports
Growth is average to above average in almost every area.
Achievement is high in all areas.
We are continuing to find areas to improve.
Achievement is high relative to local, state, and national comparisons.