17
2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th , 2011 1

2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

1

2011 Annual Performance Review

Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst

City of Vancouver, Washington May 16th, 2011

Page 2: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

2

Community Strategic Indicators - 2010 Report

Summary of Changes

Trends and Analysis

Changes on the horizon

Performance Snapshot Workshops

Timeline of presentations

Changes on the horizon

Agenda

Page 3: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

3

• Citizen designed• Staff produced• No numbers,

charts• Six outcomes,

each with eight measureswww.cityofvancouver.us/

strategicindicators

- Healthy, Livable & Sustainable

- Transportation, Mobility & Connectivity

- Financial Health & Economic Vitality

- Accountable, Responsive Government

- Safe & Prepared Community- Active, Involved Community

Page 4: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

4

Strategic Indicators: Economy & Safety are the drivers

www.cityofvancouver.us/strategicindicators

Page 5: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

5

Page 6: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

Star means data comes from community survey

6

Page 7: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

7

Page 8: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

8

Page 9: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

9

Page 10: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

10

Page 11: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

11

• Community is more active in many ways

• Residents generally satisfied with service levels although some core services are degrading

• External financial conditions: still negative

• City is managing the financial situation well

• Quality of life: noticeable erosion by early 2010

• Perception of safety is good, but crime is up

• Traffic safety was a high point

Community Strategic Indicators -Trends

Page 12: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

12

•Reduce time and effort to populate

data

•Reset some goals where appropriate

•Communicate more, improve context

•Survey focus: Should it be how well

we meet expectations or satisfaction?

• Adjust indicators with public input…

Community Strategic Indicators -Future

Page 13: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

13

Community (Informational) Outcomes & Indicators

Used to inform the public, inform strategic directions

Tend to focus on annual (or longer) trends

Often include a more complete view of the processes

Organizational (Management) Outcomes & Indicators

Used to inform decisions, manage the organization

Annually, quarterly, monthly

Focus on our part of the process

Time intensive

An Emerging Issue: The Community vs Management View of Information

Page 14: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

14

Indicator: Emergency Medical Response time

•Organization view: Department response time• Time from department notification to arrival of their first unit (only our specific unit responses)

•Community view: Total community response time• Time from initial call to 911 center to arrival of any help on scene

Issue Example: EMS Response

Page 15: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

15

Positives about business plans

- Departments understand their businesses better

- Quantify deliverables, outcomes desired, key processes

- Plan for the future based on the expected environment

- Nearly all direct services have completed one, many others

Negatives:

- Very time intensive

- Depend on a relatively stable future to be effective, and that is not the case now

- Resources not available to work Business Plans and evolve to BI over next two years; One needs to be “on hold”

Business Plans: Near term hold on new work

Page 16: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

16

2011 Presentations:

May 16 – Public Works (Today)

June 13 – Police

July 11 –Law & Fire

Future of Performance Reporting:

Oracle Business Intelligence: a leap

Dramatically reduce effort for basic data

Timely, data-informed analysis & decisions

Annual Performance Reporting “Snapshots”

Page 17: 2011 Annual Performance Review Tom Nosack, Performance Analyst City of Vancouver, Washington May 16 th, 2011 1

17

Questions?

 

Tom NosackPerformance AnalystCity of Vancouver, Washingtonphone: (360) 487-8474 Email: [email protected]

"In the absence of clearly-defined goals, we become strangely loyal to performing daily trivia until ultimately we become enslaved by it." - Robert Heinlein