16
2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group [email protected] Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007 Summary Methodology / Realization Factor Trends – Mass / Transponders Operator Assessment Macro Economics Summary

2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group [email protected] Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

2007 Commercial GSO Demand

Forecast

May 2007

Beth King

COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group

[email protected]

Cover art by John Sloan/FAA

2007 Summary

Methodology / Realization Factor

Trends – Mass / Transponders

Operator Assessment

Macro Economics

Summary

Page 2: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 2COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

2007 GSO Summary

2007 Commercial GSO Satellite Demand Forecast Effectively The Same As 2006 Forecast

21.0 Average Satellite Demand15.3 Average Launch Demand

0

5

10

15

20

25

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Nu

mb

er

of

Sa

tell

ite

s/L

au

nc

he

s

2007 Satellite Demand Forecast

2007 Launch Demand Forecast

Page 3: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 3COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Report History

Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast– Updated Annually Since 1993– Methodology Has Been Consistent Over Time, With Ongoing

Enhancements To Final Product– 10-year Forecast Horizon (2007-2016)

2007 Report Presents Updates On– Realization Factor – Growth In Satellite Mass And Transponders Per Satellite– Industry Developments That May Affect Demand– Respondents’ Views On Factors Affecting Demand

Page 4: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 4COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Working Group Participation

Beth King (2007 GSO Forecast Chair) - Lockheed Martin

Dr. Alexander Liang (T&IWG Chair) - Aerospace Corporation

Darren Chambo – Lockheed Martin

Lisa Hague – Aerospace Corporation

Doug Howe / Josef Lore - The Boeing Company

John Sloan - FAA AST

Veronica Johnson / Greg Caudel – United Launch Alliance

David Keslow - Orbital Sciences Corporation

Debra Facktor Lepore - AirLaunch LLC

Joanna Malvino / Bill Hayes / Kathy Shockey - Space Systems / Loral

Jennifer Miceli - Tecolote Research / USAF/SMC/MV

Chris O’Connell - Sea Launch

Chris Sanders - Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne

Page 5: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 5COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Forecast Data Request

GSO Satellite Launch Demand Requested For 2007-2016

From 85 Companies Worldwide

– Comprehensive:

• 6 U.S. And 3 International Satellite Manufacturers /

Launch Service Providers

– Individual:

• 13 Demand Inputs From Satellite Operators

Questionnaire On Factors Affecting Market Demand

– 12 Satellite Operators Responded To Questions On How

Various Factors Affected Their Plans To Procure New

Satellites

Page 6: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 6COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Forecast Methodology

Near-term (2007-2009) Mission Model– “Bottoms-up” By Name

– Timing And Likelihood Of Launches Assessed

Long-term (2010-2016) Demand Forecast– Average Of Comprehensive Domestic Forecasts By Mass

Categories

Only “Addressable” Commercial GSO Satellites– Defined As Those Open For Internationally Competitive

Launch Service Procurement

Page 7: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 7COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Satellite and Launch Forecast

Reflects Increase Of Dual Launch Capacity By Ariane

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Nu

mb

er

of

Sa

tell

ite

s/L

au

nc

he

s

Dual Manifest Launches

Single Manifest Launches

Satellites

Actual Long-Term

Demand Forecast

Near-

Term

Manifest

Page 8: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 8COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Historical Forecast Comparison

2007 Forecast More Stable Than 2006

10

15

20

25

30

35

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Num

ber of

Sat

ellit

es 2002 satellite Demand Forecast

2003 Satellite Demand Forecast

2004 Satellite Demand Forecast

2005 Satellite Demand Forecast

2006 Satellite Demand Forecast

2007 Satellite Demand Forecast

Page 9: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 9COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Satellite Launch “Realization” vs. Demand

The COMSTAC GSO Forecast Projects Demand For Satellite Launches

Several Factors Can Affect The Execution Of A Scheduled Launch In A Given Year, Including:

– Satellite Delays– Launch Vehicle Delays– Manifesting Delays

A “Realization” Factor Is Calculated Based On An Historical

Analysis Of Forecast Vs Actual Satellite Launches For The First And Second Year Of The Forecast

– This Years Model Changed Realization Factor To Last 5 Years Historical

– Funding– Weather– Regulatory Delays

Page 10: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 10COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

2006 Actual Launches vs. Forecasted Demand

2006 GSO Planned Actual23 19

Satellite (2)Launch Vehicle (1)Satellite / Launch Vehicle (1)Schedule – Dual Manifest (1)Early Launch 1

83% Actual vs. ForecastRealization Factor Predicted 13-20 Launches

Page 11: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 11COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Forecast with Realization

Since Implementation Of The Realization Factor Actual Satellites Launched Has Fallen Within Adjusted Band

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

Sa

tell

ite

s

Historical 1st Year SatelliteDemand Forecast2007 Satellite DemandForecastActual Satellites Launched

= Expected Realization

Historical 1st Yr

ForecastLong-Term Demand Forecast

Near-Term Manifest

Actual

Page 12: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 12COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Forecast By Satellite Mass Class

2007 Forecast Indicates Stability In Average Satellite Mass

Number Of Small Satellites Continues To Shrink

Below 2,200 kg (<4,850 lbm)

2,200 to 4,200 kg (4,850 - 9,260 lbm) 4,200 to 5,400 kg

(9,260 - 11,900 lbm)

Over 5,400kg

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

Nu

mb

er

of

Sa

tell

ite

s L

au

nc

he

d Actual Long-Term Demand Forecast

Near-Term Manifest

Page 13: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 13COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Spacecraft Trends: Transponders

Transponder Peaks With Number of Launches

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

of

C/K

u/K

a T

ran

sp

on

de

rs L

au

nc

he

d p

er

Ye

ar

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Av

era

ge

Tra

ns

po

nd

ers

pe

r S

ate

llit

e L

au

nc

he

d

Total Number of Transponders per YearAverage Transponders per Satellite

Page 14: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 14COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Satellite Operator AssessmentSignificant Negative Impact

Some Negative Impact

No Effect Some Positive Impact

Significant Positive Impact

Compared to 2006 = more pos = more neg

Regional or global economic conditions 0% 42% 33% 17% 8%

Demand for satellite services 0% 25% 8% 50% 17% -

Ability to compete with terrestrial services

0% 17% 50% 17% 17%

Availability of financing 8% 17% 58% 17% 0%

Availability of affordable insurance 0% 33% 50% 17% 0%

Consolidation of service providers 9% 27% 64% 0% 0%

Increasing satellite life times 0% 17% 83% 0% 0% -

Availability of satellite systems that meet your requirements

8% 8% 58% 17% 8%

Reliability of satellite systems 0% 27% 45% 27% 0% -

Availability of launch vehicles that meet your requirements 17% 42% 33% 0% 8%

Reliability of launch systems 0% 50% 33% 17% 0%

Ability to obtain required export licenses 17% 42% 42% 0% 0%

Ability to obtain required operating licenses 0% 8% 83% 0% 8%

Legend

Large # positive

Large # negative

Slightly positive or negative

Page 15: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 15COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Satellite Operator Assessment - Macro Economics

Availability / Reliability of Launch Vehicles

– Sea Launch Failure – Full Manifests

Economic Conditions

– Continue To Improve, Caution For Potential Financial Bubble

U.S. Government Regulatory Environment

– Continues to drive foreign operators away from U.S. providers

New Commercial Competitors In Launch Market

– Land Launch, Soyuz From French Guiana, Japan and India Launch

Vehicles

Rollout Of New Services

– Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), Ancillary Terrestrial Component

(ATC)

42%

42%

50%

Page 16: 2007 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast May 2007 Beth King COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group beth.king@lmco.com Cover art by John Sloan/FAA 2007

5/18/2007 16COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2007 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast

Summary of Findings

GSO Demand Forecast

– Average Annual Satellite Launch Demand Of 21.0 Per Year

– 2007 Demand For 23, Between 15 And 19 Realization

Continued Trend Towards Heavier Satellites, Decrease In Demand Of <2,200 Kg Satellites

Availability And Reliability Of Launch Vehicles, And Export Licensing, Are Largest Business Factors

New Broadband Services May Spur Growth In Demand In Coming Years

– HDTV

– DAR

– ATC

– MSS