Upload
whitney-alexis
View
41
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CAMS/HIST 180CAMS/HIST 180CAMS/HIST 180CAMS/HIST 180
Ancient WarfareAncient WarfareAncient WarfareAncient Warfare
PossibilitiesPossibilitiesPossibilitiesPossibilities ““Operational” definition would Operational” definition would require adanced organizationrequire adanced organization Warfare unlikely before NeolithicWarfare unlikely before Neolithic
““Attitudinal” definition Attitudinal” definition allows Palaeolithic warfareallows Palaeolithic warfare Issue of population densitiesIssue of population densities
Can these propositions be Can these propositions be tested against prehistoric tested against prehistoric evidence?evidence? risks circularity of argumentrisks circularity of argument
““Operational” definition would Operational” definition would require adanced organizationrequire adanced organization Warfare unlikely before NeolithicWarfare unlikely before Neolithic
““Attitudinal” definition Attitudinal” definition allows Palaeolithic warfareallows Palaeolithic warfare Issue of population densitiesIssue of population densities
Can these propositions be Can these propositions be tested against prehistoric tested against prehistoric evidence?evidence? risks circularity of argumentrisks circularity of argument
ArchaeologyArchaeologyArchaeologyArchaeology No written records before ca. No written records before ca. 3000 BC3000 BC
Prehistory restricted to Prehistory restricted to physical remainsphysical remains
Three classes of evidence for Three classes of evidence for early warfareearly warfare Human remains with traumaHuman remains with trauma Weapons/imagesWeapons/images fortificationsfortifications
No written records before ca. No written records before ca. 3000 BC3000 BC
Prehistory restricted to Prehistory restricted to physical remainsphysical remains
Three classes of evidence for Three classes of evidence for early warfareearly warfare Human remains with traumaHuman remains with trauma Weapons/imagesWeapons/images fortificationsfortifications
Human TraumaHuman TraumaHuman TraumaHuman Trauma Very ancient damaged bones are Very ancient damaged bones are knownknown Breaks, fractures, puncture woundsBreaks, fractures, puncture wounds Evidence for warfare?Evidence for warfare?
Some wounds correspond to size and Some wounds correspond to size and shape of stone artifactsshape of stone artifacts
HowHow was wound inflicted? was wound inflicted? Animal attack?Animal attack? Ritual?Ritual? Clumsy accident?Clumsy accident?
Violent death in groups is bestViolent death in groups is best
Very ancient damaged bones are Very ancient damaged bones are knownknown Breaks, fractures, puncture woundsBreaks, fractures, puncture wounds Evidence for warfare?Evidence for warfare?
Some wounds correspond to size and Some wounds correspond to size and shape of stone artifactsshape of stone artifacts
HowHow was wound inflicted? was wound inflicted? Animal attack?Animal attack? Ritual?Ritual? Clumsy accident?Clumsy accident?
Violent death in groups is bestViolent death in groups is best
Ofnet, Germany (Mesolithic)
Ofnet, Germany (Mesolithic)
Jebel Sahaba (10,000 BC)Jebel Sahaba (10,000 BC)
Jebel Sahaba StatsJebel Sahaba Stats
AgeAge
children (6 children (6 mos-12 yrs)mos-12 yrs) 11 11adolescentadolescent 2 2young adultyoung adult 5 5adultadult 15 15middle-agedmiddle-aged 1818oldold 8 8
SexSex
female female 21 male 21 male
20 20
undetermined: undetermined: 1818
Violent DeathViolent Death
w/ artifacts w/ artifacts 28 (4 28 (4 uncertaiuncertain)n)
w/out artifacts w/out artifacts 31 31
Talheim Deposit (5000 BC)Talheim Deposit (5000 BC)Talheim Deposit (5000 BC)Talheim Deposit (5000 BC) Excavated in 1983-1984 in Excavated in 1983-1984 in GermanyGermany
34 skeletons (18 adults, 16 34 skeletons (18 adults, 16 children)children)
Skeletons Skeletons Showed signs of violent death, Showed signs of violent death, most from behindmost from behind
Multiple blows were commonMultiple blows were common All buried jumbled up, entagledAll buried jumbled up, entagled no grave goodsno grave goods
Excavated in 1983-1984 in Excavated in 1983-1984 in GermanyGermany
34 skeletons (18 adults, 16 34 skeletons (18 adults, 16 children)children)
Skeletons Skeletons Showed signs of violent death, Showed signs of violent death, most from behindmost from behind
Multiple blows were commonMultiple blows were common All buried jumbled up, entagledAll buried jumbled up, entagled no grave goodsno grave goods
ArtifactsArtifactsArtifactsArtifacts Stone tools: axes, arrow- and Stone tools: axes, arrow- and spearheads, javelins, spear-spearheads, javelins, spear-throwers (throwers (atl-atlatl-atl), bows), bows
All could be used for huntingAll could be used for hunting Two exceptions:Two exceptions:
MaceMace DaggerDagger
BUT, could be ceremonialBUT, could be ceremonial Iconography (from ca. 25,000 BC)Iconography (from ca. 25,000 BC)
Stone tools: axes, arrow- and Stone tools: axes, arrow- and spearheads, javelins, spear-spearheads, javelins, spear-throwers (throwers (atl-atlatl-atl), bows), bows
All could be used for huntingAll could be used for hunting Two exceptions:Two exceptions:
MaceMace DaggerDagger
BUT, could be ceremonialBUT, could be ceremonial Iconography (from ca. 25,000 BC)Iconography (from ca. 25,000 BC)
HuntingBowmenHuntingBowmen
Hunting AccidentHunting Accident
Cougnac, ca.
13,500 BC
Cougnac, ca.
13,500 BC
Cougnac DetailCougnac Detail
Castellon, Spain (7-4,000 BC)Castellon, Spain (7-4,000 BC)
Castellon, Spain
Castellon, Spain
Castellon, Spain
Castellon, Spain
IconographyIconographyIconographyIconography Seems to be incontrovertible evidence Seems to be incontrovertible evidence for warfarefor warfare
““Pincushioning” attested in other Pincushioning” attested in other culturescultures
But we do not know exactly how to But we do not know exactly how to read these imagesread these images
We do not know conventions of We do not know conventions of neolithic iconographyneolithic iconography
How would our art be interpreted by How would our art be interpreted by scholars 6-9,000 years from now? scholars 6-9,000 years from now?
Seems to be incontrovertible evidence Seems to be incontrovertible evidence for warfarefor warfare
““Pincushioning” attested in other Pincushioning” attested in other culturescultures
But we do not know exactly how to But we do not know exactly how to read these imagesread these images
We do not know conventions of We do not know conventions of neolithic iconographyneolithic iconography
How would our art be interpreted by How would our art be interpreted by scholars 6-9,000 years from now? scholars 6-9,000 years from now?
Jericho (7000 BC)Jericho (7000 BC)
Jericho (site)Jericho (site)
Jericho’s WallsJericho’s Walls
Jericho: Tower
Jericho: Tower
Jericho’s WallsJericho’s Walls
Jericho:
Flints
Jericho:
Flints
Çatal Hüyük (6500 BC)Çatal Hüyük (6500 BC)
Çatal HüyükÇatal Hüyük
Çatal Hüyük: headless (?) corpses and
vulture
Çatal Hüyük: headless (?) corpses and
vulture
Kuruçay
Archaeology AgainArchaeology AgainArchaeology AgainArchaeology Again Evidence open to multiple Evidence open to multiple interpretationsinterpretations
Less evidence => more possible Less evidence => more possible interpretationsinterpretations
No written sources to guide usNo written sources to guide us Lack of clarity about cultural Lack of clarity about cultural context of depositscontext of deposits
Danger of circular reasoningDanger of circular reasoning Evidence for intraspecies Evidence for intraspecies killing IS securekilling IS secure
Evidence open to multiple Evidence open to multiple interpretationsinterpretations
Less evidence => more possible Less evidence => more possible interpretationsinterpretations
No written sources to guide usNo written sources to guide us Lack of clarity about cultural Lack of clarity about cultural context of depositscontext of deposits
Danger of circular reasoningDanger of circular reasoning Evidence for intraspecies Evidence for intraspecies killing IS securekilling IS secure
Ethnography: UseEthnography: UseEthnography: UseEthnography: Use One approach: ethnographic dataOne approach: ethnographic data Researchers look to modern Researchers look to modern “primitive” societies for “primitive” societies for patterns that explain patterns that explain archaeological evidencearchaeological evidence ““Pincushioning”Pincushioning” Yanomamo and MaringYanomamo and Maring Kelly’s “attitudinal” modelKelly’s “attitudinal” model
All of these assume modern = All of these assume modern = AncientAncient
One approach: ethnographic dataOne approach: ethnographic data Researchers look to modern Researchers look to modern “primitive” societies for “primitive” societies for patterns that explain patterns that explain archaeological evidencearchaeological evidence ““Pincushioning”Pincushioning” Yanomamo and MaringYanomamo and Maring Kelly’s “attitudinal” modelKelly’s “attitudinal” model
All of these assume modern = All of these assume modern = AncientAncient
Ethnography: ProblemsEthnography: ProblemsEthnography: ProblemsEthnography: Problems Some critics of this approachSome critics of this approach Hard view: all observation Hard view: all observation changes behaviorchanges behavior A version of the Heisenberg A version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty PrincipleUncertainty Principle
Modern “primitives” not cavemen, Modern “primitives” not cavemen, bypassed by evolutionbypassed by evolution
Behavior deeply influenced by Behavior deeply influenced by contact with settled populationscontact with settled populations
Environment also has changed Environment also has changed (constrained)(constrained)
Response: What is being compared?Response: What is being compared?
Some critics of this approachSome critics of this approach Hard view: all observation Hard view: all observation changes behaviorchanges behavior A version of the Heisenberg A version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty PrincipleUncertainty Principle
Modern “primitives” not cavemen, Modern “primitives” not cavemen, bypassed by evolutionbypassed by evolution
Behavior deeply influenced by Behavior deeply influenced by contact with settled populationscontact with settled populations
Environment also has changed Environment also has changed (constrained)(constrained)
Response: What is being compared?Response: What is being compared?
Sociobioly & EthologySociobioly & EthologySociobioly & EthologySociobioly & Ethology Universality of war is striking Universality of war is striking
of 563 known cultures, 8 are warlessof 563 known cultures, 8 are warless Cultural and contextual explanations found Cultural and contextual explanations found to be wantingto be wanting
Humans not the only violent animal Humans not the only violent animal (ant wars)(ant wars)
Perhaps violence and war are Perhaps violence and war are hardwired behaviors?hardwired behaviors? Sociobiology; E.O. Wilson (1975)Sociobiology; E.O. Wilson (1975) EthologyEthology
Jane Goodall, Gombe Chimpanzee Jane Goodall, Gombe Chimpanzee Reserve, tanzania Reserve, tanzania 1960s - present1960s - present
Universality of war is striking Universality of war is striking of 563 known cultures, 8 are warlessof 563 known cultures, 8 are warless Cultural and contextual explanations found Cultural and contextual explanations found to be wantingto be wanting
Humans not the only violent animal Humans not the only violent animal (ant wars)(ant wars)
Perhaps violence and war are Perhaps violence and war are hardwired behaviors?hardwired behaviors? Sociobiology; E.O. Wilson (1975)Sociobiology; E.O. Wilson (1975) EthologyEthology
Jane Goodall, Gombe Chimpanzee Jane Goodall, Gombe Chimpanzee Reserve, tanzania Reserve, tanzania 1960s - present1960s - present
Chimp WarsChimp WarsChimp WarsChimp Wars Chimps closest ancestorChimps closest ancestor
We share 98% of their genetic codeWe share 98% of their genetic code Shared ancestor ca. 5 million years agoShared ancestor ca. 5 million years ago
Internal violence and huntingInternal violence and hunting In 1974 remarkable discoveryIn 1974 remarkable discovery
1970-1973: Chimps fractured into two bands1970-1973: Chimps fractured into two bands Border patrolsBorder patrols Organized raids of 6-8 males; marked by Organized raids of 6-8 males; marked by stealthstealth
Any “neighbor” chimp caught alone was Any “neighbor” chimp caught alone was brutally killedbrutally killed
One band wiped out neighbors in three One band wiped out neighbors in three yearsyears
Chimps closest ancestorChimps closest ancestor We share 98% of their genetic codeWe share 98% of their genetic code Shared ancestor ca. 5 million years agoShared ancestor ca. 5 million years ago
Internal violence and huntingInternal violence and hunting In 1974 remarkable discoveryIn 1974 remarkable discovery
1970-1973: Chimps fractured into two bands1970-1973: Chimps fractured into two bands Border patrolsBorder patrols Organized raids of 6-8 males; marked by Organized raids of 6-8 males; marked by stealthstealth
Any “neighbor” chimp caught alone was Any “neighbor” chimp caught alone was brutally killedbrutally killed
One band wiped out neighbors in three One band wiped out neighbors in three yearsyears
Reading Chimp WarsReading Chimp WarsReading Chimp WarsReading Chimp Wars Violence of chimps is establishedViolence of chimps is established Is brutality hardwired into us?Is brutality hardwired into us?
““Male coalitional violence”Male coalitional violence” Problems:Problems:
Contrast with Bonobo chimps, where females Contrast with Bonobo chimps, where females are equal; no violenceare equal; no violence
Does modern chimp = 5/6 mill. ancestor?Does modern chimp = 5/6 mill. ancestor? 15 years before violence erupted at Gombe15 years before violence erupted at Gombe Modern chimps constrained, hunted (Gombe Modern chimps constrained, hunted (Gombe is 12.35 sq. miles)is 12.35 sq. miles)
““Naïve” chimps found at Goualougo Naïve” chimps found at Goualougo Triangle, Congo in 1999Triangle, Congo in 1999
Violence of chimps is establishedViolence of chimps is established Is brutality hardwired into us?Is brutality hardwired into us?
““Male coalitional violence”Male coalitional violence” Problems:Problems:
Contrast with Bonobo chimps, where females Contrast with Bonobo chimps, where females are equal; no violenceare equal; no violence
Does modern chimp = 5/6 mill. ancestor?Does modern chimp = 5/6 mill. ancestor? 15 years before violence erupted at Gombe15 years before violence erupted at Gombe Modern chimps constrained, hunted (Gombe Modern chimps constrained, hunted (Gombe is 12.35 sq. miles)is 12.35 sq. miles)
““Naïve” chimps found at Goualougo Naïve” chimps found at Goualougo Triangle, Congo in 1999Triangle, Congo in 1999
ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusions Hardwired argument is unprovenHardwired argument is unproven
In all cultures, warfare needs In all cultures, warfare needs justificationjustification
Interesting that chimps and humans Interesting that chimps and humans react with coalitional violence when react with coalitional violence when circumscribed and resources are scarcecircumscribed and resources are scarce
Violence and war => propensity Violence and war => propensity elicited by circumstanceelicited by circumstance Not an inevitable destinyNot an inevitable destiny
Archaeology shows intraspecies killing Archaeology shows intraspecies killing goes back millenniagoes back millennia
Definition of warfare resurfaces to Definition of warfare resurfaces to constrain conclusionsconstrain conclusions
Hardwired argument is unprovenHardwired argument is unproven In all cultures, warfare needs In all cultures, warfare needs justificationjustification
Interesting that chimps and humans Interesting that chimps and humans react with coalitional violence when react with coalitional violence when circumscribed and resources are scarcecircumscribed and resources are scarce
Violence and war => propensity Violence and war => propensity elicited by circumstanceelicited by circumstance Not an inevitable destinyNot an inevitable destiny
Archaeology shows intraspecies killing Archaeology shows intraspecies killing goes back millenniagoes back millennia
Definition of warfare resurfaces to Definition of warfare resurfaces to constrain conclusionsconstrain conclusions