Upload
melinda-gordon
View
227
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
1/21
2012
Liew
1
Local Buckling &
Section Classification
CE5509 RLiew
2
Introduction
ClassesofCrossSections
MaximumWidthtoThicknessRatiosforCompressionPartsInternalCompressionPartsOutstandCompressionPartsAngles&TubularSections
EffectiveCrossSectionforClass4Sections
Class3Web+Class1or2Flange
Examples
ExampleSC
1(Section
classification
for
combined
bending
and
compression)
ExampleSC2(EffectiveareaofaClass4compressionmember)ExampleSC3(SectionwithClass3webandClass1flanges)
Outline
CE5509 RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
2/21
2012
Liew
3
Steel members are generally composed of thin elements for structuralefficiency.
The slender elements are prone to local instabilities under compressivestress, even before the yield strength is reached.
The effects of local buckling are accounted for in EC3 by classifying thecross-section into Classes 1, 2, 3 or 4.
Cross-section classification is made by comparing actual width-to-thickness ratios of the plate elements with a set of limiting values.
The classification of the overall cross-section is taken as the leastfavourable of the constituent elements.
IntroductionCE5509 RLiew
Local BucklingWhen the section is not standard section but fabricatedfrom thin elements, the section element may bucklelocally before fy is reached due to slenderness
4
RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
3/21
2012
Liew
Local Buckling and Section Classification
Factors Influencing Local Buckling
Boundary conditionsinternal elements or outstands
Local Slenderness d/t internal element (eg. web) b/T outstand (eg. flange)
Youngs modulus Yield strength Stress distribution Strain (deformation) requirement Residual stresses
b
t
5
Elements to be classified
For a Hot finished RHScf= (b-2r - tw)/2 cw=h-2(tf+ r)
Universal Beam
cf= b-2(tw+r) cw=h-2(t + r)
6
RLiew
cf
hcw
b
tWeb
Flange
Outstand
cf
Internal element
cw
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
4/21
2012
Liew
RLiew
7
Classes of Cross-Sections
Why classify ?
Class 1
Rotation, Moment
Mpl
Mel
Rotational capacity
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
MM
Neutral
axis
Neutralaxis
Bending stress distributions at maximum moment capacity
Class 2
fy
Class 3
fy
Class 4
fy
Class 1
fy
8
RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
5/21
2012
Liew
9
StrainStress
fy
Classes of Cross-Sections
Class 1Cross sections with both plastic moment capacity and plastic hinge rotation
capacity.M
c,Rd
= fy
Wpl
/M0
Class 2Cross-sections with plastic moment capacity but limited plastic hinge
rotation capacity.Mc,Rd= fyWpl /M0
Class 3Cross-sections in which the stress in the extreme compression fibre canreach the yield strength, but only the elastic moment capacity can bedeveloped.
Mc,Rd= fyWel /M0
Class 4Cross-sections in which local buckling will occur before the attainment of
yield stress.Mc,Rd= fyWeff/M0
Class 1
Rotation, Moment
MplMel
Rotational capacity
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
RLiew
10
Maximum Width to Thickness Ratiosfor Compression Parts
CE5509 RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
6/21
2012
Liew
RLiew
11
Internal COMPRESSION Parts
ClassPart subjectto bending
Part subj ect tocompression
Part subject to Stress distributionb end in g an d co mp res si on (c om pr es si on +v e)
1
2
3
Max Width-to-Thickness Ratios for Compression Parts
Web
InternalFlange
EN 1993-1-1 (Table 5.2)
12
Consider the case ofI orH section subjected to compression and major axis bending, wherethe neutral axis lies within the web.
+
The ratio of the tensile stress to the compressive stress
at the extreme fibers, , can be calculated as follows:
The ratio of the compressed width to the total width
of the element, , can be calculated as follows:
+
tf
tw
RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
7/21
2012
Liew
13
ClassPart subject to Stress distributioncompression (compression +ve)
Part subject to bending and compression
Tip in Stress distribution
compression (compression +ve)
Tip in Stress distribution
tension (compression +ve)
1
2
3
Outstand COMPRESSION Parts
Max Width-to-Thickness Ratios for Compression Parts
OutstandFlange
Determination ofBuckling Factork
c
+ 12
c
+ 12 -
=2/1 1 0 -1 1 -3
k
0.43 0.57 0.85 0.57 - 0 .21+ 0.072
c
+ 21
c
+ 21
-
=2/1 1 1 0 0 0 -1 -1
k
0.43 0.578/(+ 0.34) 1.70 1.7 -5+ 17.12 23.8
21 21
EN 1993-1-1 (Table 5.2)
EN 1993-1-5 (Table 4.2)
RLiew
14
Class Section in compression
1
2
3
Angles(not in continuous contact with other components)
Max Width-to-Thickness Ratios for Compression Parts
Tubular Sections
Class Section in bending and/or compression
1
2
3
EN 1993-1-1 (Table 5.2)
RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
8/21
2012
Liew
15
Effective Cross-Sectionfor Class 4 Sections
CE5509 RLiew
16
Effective Cross-Section for Class 4 SectionsEN 1993-1-5 Clause 4.4
Stepsindeterminingthereductionfactorforplatebuckling
Determine the stress distribution
AdditionalrulesforelementsofIsectionandBoxGirder
For flange elements, use the gross cross-sectional area to determine the stress distribution.
For web elements, use the effective area of the compression flange and the gross area of the web todetermine the stress distribution.
Determine stress ratio 2/1 and buckling factork
This depends on whether it is internal or external compression element.
The effective area Aeff should be determined assuming that the cross section is subjectonly to uniform axial compression.
The effective section modulus Weff should be determined assuming the cross section is subjectonly to bending moment.For biaxial bending, effective se ction moduli should be determined about both main axes.
whereAc and bc are respectively the area of the section and the width of the element in compression.
CE5509 RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
9/21
2012
Liew
17
2
1
2
1
InternalCompressionElements
1 0 1k 4.0 7.81 23.9
Common values of
OutstandCompressionElements
1
212
2
1
2
1
1 0 1k 0.43 0.57 0.85
Common values of
Tipunderlarger compressivestress
1 0 1k 0.43 1.70 23.8
Common values of
Tipundersmaller compressivestress
k1 0 8.2/(1.05 + )
0 1 7.81 6.29+ 9.782
1 3 5.98(1 2)
k1 3 0.57 0.21+ 0.072
k1 0 0.578/(+ 0.34)
0 1 1.7 5+ 17.12
Stress ratio and buckling factork
CE5509 RLiew
18
Calculatebw for websb for internal flange elements (except RHS)
b 3t for flanges of RHS
c for outstand flanges
h for angles
Calculate
Internalcompressionelements
Outstandcompressionelements
CE5509 RLiew
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
10/21
2012
Liew
19
21
2
1
InternalCompressionElements
OutstandCompressionElements
1
2
12 2
1
2
1
Tipunderlarger compressivestress Tipundersmaller compressivestress
21
Effective Width for Class 4 Elements
CE5509 RLiew
Cold formed steel sections
These sections aremade from thin- steelsheets.
They are prone tolocal buckling.
Effective sectionproperties are needed.
20
SSEN 1993-1-3
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
11/21
2012
Liew
21
Class 3 Web + Class 1 or 2 Flange
CE5509 RLiew
CE5509 RLiew
22
Class 3 Web + Class 1 or 2 Flange
EN 1993-1-1 (Cl 5.5.2(11) & Cl 6.2.2.4)
Cross-sections with Class 3 webs and Class 1 or 2 flanges can be classified as
effective Class 2 cross-sections with the compressed portion of the web being
replaced by a part of 20tw adjacent to the compression flange (measured from the base
of the root radius for rolled section and the base of the weld for welded section), with
another part of 20tw adjacent to the plastic neutral axis of the effective cross-section.
b
20tw
h
tw
20twCompression
Tension
Plastic neutral axis
fy
fy
+
Neglectedineffectivearea
20tw
20tw
tw
b
40tw
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
12/21
2012
Liew
8/14/2012
23
Implications for Design
Class 1. Plastic mustbe used in plasticdesign, can sustain high strain. Can beusedwithoutrestriction in normaldesign
Class 2 Compact can be used with theplastic modulus in bending
Class3 Semi-compact when inbending the elastic modulus or aneffective plastic modulus mustbe used
Class 4 Slender Effective sectionproperties must be used
Section and Design Tables
Steel building design:Design data,Publication P363, TheSteel Construction
Institute and the
British Constructional
Steelwork Association
UK, 2009.
24
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
13/21
2012
Liew
8/14/2012
25
Based on Steel buildingdesign: Design data
n limit =NE,d/ Npl,Rd
Class 2 limit
Class 3 limit
8/14/2012
26
General Guidancewhen using the Deign TablesSteel building design: Design data, Publication P-363, jointly published by
The Steel Construction Institute and the British Constructional SteelworkAssociation UK, 2009 (IVLE).
None of the universal beam and column sections ingrade S275 and S355 are class 4 under bending only.
None of the universal columns can be class 4 underpure compression; but some universal beams andhollow sections can be class 4. Sections that can beclass 4 under pure compression are marked with * in
the design tables. None of the UC or UB sections l isted in the design
tables are slender due to the flange being class 4.Under combined axial compression and bending, thesection would be Class 2 or Class 3 up to given n =NEd/N pl,Rd limits.
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
14/21
2012
Liew
8/14/2012
27
Summary of design procedure
1 Select, from experience, a suitable sectionbased on the factored load effects
2Determine the section classification
3 If necessary calculate effective plasticmodulus for Class 3 (semi-compact) sections
4 If necessary calculate effective sectionproperties for class 4(slender sections)
5 Proceed with design procedures suitable for
the section classification
RLiew
28
Examples
CE5509
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
15/21
2012
Liew
RLiew
29
Design Strengthtw = 7.7mm, tf= 10.9mm.
Maximum thickness = 10.9mm < 16mm (EN 10025-2)
For S275 steel, fy = 275N/mm2
Example SC-1: Section classification fo r combined bending and compression
A member is to be designed to carry combined bending and axial load. In the presence of a
major axis (y-y) bending moment and an axial compression of 300kN, determine the cross-
section classification of a 406x178x54UB in grade S275 steel.
CE5509
RLiew
30
Section Classification
First, classify the cross-section under the most severe loading condition of pure compression todetermine whether anything is to be gained by more precise calculations.
Cross-section classification under pure compression
Classification of Flange
= (235 /fy)0.5 = 0.92
Flange is Class 1.
Classification of Web
Web is Class 4.
Under pure compression, the overall cross-section is therefore Class 4.Material efficiency are therefore to be gained by using a more precise approach.
CE5509
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
16/21
2012
Liew
RLiew
31
Cross-section classification under combined loading
Flange classification remains the same as Class 1.
Classification of Web
Web is Class 2.
Under combined loading, the overall cross-section is therefore Class 2.
CE5509
CE5509 RLiew
32
Page C-149n =300/1900=0.16
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
17/21
2012
Liew
8/14/2012
33
Example 2
S275 steel 457x152x52 UBGrade S275
A) Subject to bending about
its major axis
B) Subject to 800kN axial load
and bending about its major
axis
C) Subject to 1500kN axial
load and bending about its
major axis
8/14/2012
34
Class 2 if n < 0.169 or
NEd < 0.169 x 1830 = 309kN
Class 3 if n < 0.586 or
F < 0.586 x 1830 = 1073 kN
Page C-147
Based on Steel buildingdesign: Design data
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
18/21
2012
Liew
8/14/2012
35
a) Pure bending about its major axis
S275 steel 457x152x52 UB Grade S275
A) Subject to bending about its major axis
n = 0, therefore class 2
B) Subject to 800kN axial load and bending about its major axis
n = 800/1830 = 0.437 > 0.169 class 3
C) Subject to 1500kN axial load and bending about its major axis
n = 1500/1830 = 0.82>0.586 class 4
Npl,Rd =fyAeffMel,Rd = fyWeff
Npl,Rd =fyA
Mpl,Rd = fyWpl,Rd
Npl,Rd =fyA
Mel,Rd = fyWel,Rd
8/14/2012
36
Summary
For optimum design of welded section, thedesigner has the following choices
1. Eliminate local buckling by ensuringwidth-to-thickness ratio is sufficientlysmall
2. If higher width-to-thickness is used, usestiffeners to reduce plate width
3. Determine section capacity allowing forlocal buckling
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
19/21
2012
Liew
8/14/2012
37
Q1 What happen when the limiting plateslenderness ratios are exceeded?
Cross section strength cannot be fully developed.
i.e., cross section strength is governed by local bucklinginstead of yielding.
Q2 How can we prevent local buckling of a plate
component?
Ensure that b/t ratio is compact. Provide plate stiffener
Questions
8/14/2012
38
Q3 What effect does a slender andunstiffened element have on the strengthof compression member as opposed tothat of a non-slender element?
Slender element reduces the compression
resistance of the compression memberbecause of local buckling effect
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
20/21
2012
Liew
8/14/2012
39
8/14/2012
40
Quiz
Which of the followings are considered to bean internal elements?
1. leg of an angle
2. flange of a channel
3. Web of a I section
4. Wall of HSS
7/30/2019 2 Local Buckling and Section Classification - 2011
21/21
2012
8/14/2012
41
Q5 Determine the section classification ofthe following sections with S355 steel:
UC 254 x 254 x 89 S275 subject to axial load.
Answer: at least class 2
UC 203 x 203 x 46 S355 subject to bending.
Answer: at least class 2
UB 457 x 152 x 60 S355 subject to bending.
Answer: at least class 2
UB 457 x 152 x 60 S355 subject to axial force1500kN.
Answer: class 4