27
New directions in research on well-being: psychological process in everyday contexts Irene Petruccelli Rome, February 25 th 2021

2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    15

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

New directions in research on well-being: psychological process in everyday contexts

Irene Petruccelli

Rome, February 25th 2021

Page 2: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Behaviorist Orientation

• Theories on behaviorism are derived from several different theorists• Edward L. Thorndike, B.F. Skinner, and others.

• Assumptions include:• Environment shapes behavior• Reinforcement increases probability of desired action being

repeated2

Social Cognitive Learning Theory

Albert Bandura

Page 3: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA
Page 4: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA
Page 5: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Learning Styles

5

There are many different learning styles.

Observational learning and enactive learning.

Bandura’s social cognitive learning theory suggests that people can learn through observation but do not necessarily have to repeat the observed behavior.

Page 6: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Learning Styles

q Observational learning¡ Attention¡ Retention (memory)¡ Behavioral reversal ¡ Motivation

6

q Enactive learningLearning from the outcomes of a person’s personal actions

Page 7: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Bobo Doll Experiment

7

In 1963 Bandura conducted the Bobo Doll experiment.

This experiment showed that people will model what they see. The children viewed aggressive actions in a video and when left in the room with the Bobo doll, they exhibited the same aggressive behaviors.

According to Bandura, the behaviors were repeated 88% of the time. The behavior of the children is a result of modeling a behavior.Two groups of children watched the adult beat the bobo doll.One group saw the lady rewarded and the second saw her punished.

Page 8: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf3-tRpmGmY

Bobo Doll Experiment

Page 9: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

The Reciprocal ConceptBandura’s theory of learning takes into account three things:

9

Triadic Reciprocal Determinism

Page 10: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Human agency

Page 11: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

11

Page 12: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Self-Efficacy Appraisal

• Among the types of thoughts that affect action, none is more central or pervasive than people's judgments of their capabilities to exercise control over events thataffect their lives. • The self-efficacy mechanism plays a central role in human agency (Bandura,

1982; 1986). • Self- judgments of operative capabilities function as one set of proximal

determinants of how people behave, their thought patterns, and the emotionalreactions they experience in taxing situations. • In their daily lives, people continuously have to make decisions about what

courses of action to pursue and how long to continue those they haveundertaken. • Because acting on misjudgments of personal efficacy can produce adverse

consequences, accurate appraisal of one's own capabilities has considerablefunctional value.

Page 13: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Self-regulation

• The self-regulation of conduct is not entirely an intrapsychic affair. • Rather, it involves a reciprocity of influence between thought,

conduct, and a network of social influences. • Under social conditions in which transgressive behavior is not easily

self-excusable, conduct is likely to be congruent with more standards. • But self-regulation of moral conduct can be weakened or nullified by

exonerative moral reasoning and social circumstances.

mechanisms of moral disengagement

Page 14: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Selective Activation and Disengagement of Internal Control

Moral JustficationPalliative ComparisonEuphemistic Labeling

Minimizing, Ignoring, orMisconstruing The

Consequences

DehumanizationAttribution of Blame

Displacement of ResponsibilityDiffusion of Responsibility

ReprehensibleConduct

DetrimentalEffects Victim

Page 15: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

BANDURA: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT

• SELF-CRITICISM IS UNCOMFORTABLE

•RELAXED SELF-STANDARDS ARE USED

Page 16: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

WEAK LINKS OF DEFENSIVENESS

•DETRIMENTAL CONDUCT•INJURIOUS EFFECTS•OPPONENTS, VICTIMS

Page 17: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

TAKING THE “BAD” OUT OF BAD BEHAVIOR

•MORAL JUSTIFICATION•EUPHEMISTIC LABELING•ADVANTAGEOUS COMPARISON

Page 18: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

DOWNPLAYING PROBLEMATIC CONSEQUENCES

•RESULTS MINIMIZED, IGNORED, MISCONSTRUED

•RESULTS DENIED, DISTORTED

Page 19: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

DEMONIZING THE OPPOSITION

•VICTIM DE-HUMANIZATION

•DISPARAGING, DENIGRATING CRITICS

Page 20: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

MINIMIZING ACCOUNTABILITY

•ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME

•DISPLACEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY

•DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY

http://professoralbertbandura.com/albert-bandura-videos.html#moral-disengagement

Page 21: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA
Page 22: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Self-Efficacy (Albert Bandura)

• What’s the difference between self-esteem and self-efficacy?• How competent we feel on a task

• Leads us to set challenging goals and to persist• Competency + persistence = accomplishment / self confidence

• …if you have control over the outcome!

22

Perceived Self-Control

Page 23: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA
Page 24: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Locus of Control (Julien Rotter)

Locus of control is the degree to which people believe that they have control over the outcome of events in their lives, as opposed to external forcesbeyond their control. Understanding of the concept was developed by Julian B. Rotter in 1954, and has since become an aspect of personality studies. A person's "locus" (plural "loci", Latin for "place" or "location") isconceptualized as internal (a belief that one can control one's own life) or external (a belief that life is controlled by outside factors which the personcannot influence, or that chance or fate controls their lives).Individuals with a strong internal locus of control believe events in their life derive primarily from their own actions: for example, when receiving examresults, people with an internal locus of control tend to praise or blamethemselves and their abilities. People with a strong external locus of control tend to praise or blame external factors such as the teacher or the exam.

24

Page 25: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Social Learning TheoryExamples of social learning situations include television commercials.

• Commercials make suggestions that viewers will become as beautiful as the model on the screen if they use a particular product. Wash your hair with Dove shampoo and your hair will be just as soft, full, and beautiful as that of the model on the commercial.

• Bandura’s social cognitive learning theory suggests that people can learn through observation but do not necessarily have to repeat the observed behavior.

• So if a person sees a commercial for a product that espouses wonderful outcomes, the viewer of the commercial will not necessarily run out to purchase the product.

25

Page 26: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Exercise

• Can you think of a time when you saw a commercial for a new product?

• Did you purchase the product based on the claims of the commercial alone?

Page 27: 2. lesson Petruccelli Bandura 25.2 - LUMSA

Motivators

27

Exercise!!!

What motivates you to learn?