2 2 Reactive services Proactive Services Architecture Design
Review Operational Readiness Review Performance and Stability
Review Field Services Enablement Key Learnings Field PM Customer
Advisory Team Customer Response Engineering CX Field Engagement
Teams Field and Partner Resources CSS, Premier Field Engineering,
Partners CSS, Premier Field Engineering, Partners MCS, PFE,
Partners, Virtual TS MCS, PFE, Partners, Virtual TS TS & SSP
Partners, Virtual TS TS & SSP Partners, Virtual TS Opportunity
development Sales Assistance Readiness and Training POC, Pilot
Virtual TS team ADS District Planning Product Escalations QFE &
DCR Service Packs Beta Support Serviceability Institutionalized
services delivered by specialized product team to support field and
partner resources in the sale, delivery and on-going support of
BizTalk projects
29 Vs. Logical Port Orchestration Inline Sends
Orchestration
Slide 30
Slide 31
Test Concurrent Test Client Users Messages Per Second Avg
Response (s) % < 3 seconds Messages Per Day Test Length Test
Case 1 Baseline R2 32 Bit Orch 10045.42.2494.36 ~1,309,000 10
minutes 2009 - 64 bit Orch 10034.32.8975.45 ~987,000 10 minutes
Test Case 1 Optimized R2 64 bit Orch 10058.061.6997.5 ~1,672,000 10
minutes 2009* 64 Bit Orch 10060.641.6197.97 ~1,746,000 10
minutes
Slide 32
Test Concurrent Test Client Users Messages Per Second Avg
Response (sec) % < 3 seconds Messages Per Day Test Length
Logical Ports 2009 100 initial increasing by 100 every 4 minutes
64.96.5118.43 ~1,869,000 30 minutes Inline Sends 2009 100 initial
increasing by 100 every 4 minutes 148.15 0.2399.98 ~4,262,000 30
minutes Test Concurrent Test Client Users Messages Per Second Avg
Response (sec) % < 3 seconds Messages Per Day Test Length
Logical Ports 200910060.641.6197.97 ~1,746,000 10 minutes Inline
Sends 2009100 236.96 0.2499.98 ~6,824,000 10 minutes
Slide 33
Test Concurrent Test Client Users Messages Per Second Avg
Response (s) % < 3 seconds Messages Per 8-hour Day Test Length
Logical Ports on Optimized Platform 2009 10060.641.6197.97
~1,746,000 10 minutes 2009 Hyper-V 10052.961.8694.8 ~1,520,000 10
minutes Inline Sends on Optimized Platform 2009100 236.96 0.2499.98
~6,824,000 10 minutes 2009 Hyper-V 100223.540.2899.87 ~6,438,000 10
minutes Hyper-V provides ~87% throughput* Hyper V ~15% worse
latency* *Note: Calculated from Logical Ports Test
Slide 34
Microsoft BizTalk Server Performance Optimization Guide
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc558617.aspx Microsoft
BizTalk Server Operations Guide
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc296643.aspx BizTalk
Server 2006 R2 Hyper-V Guide
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc768518.aspx BizTalk
Server Database Optimization
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb743398.aspx Developing
Integration Solutions using BizTalk Server 2006 and Team Foundation
Server
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=ed7bd
0ee-1385-4041-8f2a-354594ee88f3&DisplayLang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=ed7bd
0ee-1385-4041-8f2a-354594ee88f3&DisplayLang=en Using the
Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) Adapters in BizTalk Server
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=a976dc
7d-2296-4f88-be4d-0d314fca9e59&displaylang=en&tm
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=a976dc
7d-2296-4f88-be4d-0d314fca9e59&displaylang=en&tm
Slide 35
Slide 36
2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft,
Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be
registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other
countries. The information herein is for informational purposes
only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of
the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to
changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a
commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee
the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this
presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR
STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.
