2
1617.4 - Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure for Seismic Design of Buildings cenews.com /article/4081/1617.4%ef%bf%bdequivalent_lateral_force_procedure_for_seismic_design_of_ buildings October 2005 » Columns » CODE SIMPLE The International Code Council’s 2003 International Building Code (IBC) Section 1617.4 refers to the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. S. K. Ghosh, Ph.D. 1617.4—Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure for Seismic Design of Buildings The International Code Council’s 2003 International Building Code (IBC) Section 1617.4 refers to the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7- 02) Section 9.5.5 for the commonly used equivalent lateral force procedure. At the end of ASCE 7-02 Section 9.5.5, there is a very important, and often overlooked provision, which reads as follows: For regular structures 5 stories or less in height and having a period, T, of 0.5 sec or less, the seismic response coefficient, Cs, shall be permitted to be calculated using values of 1.5g and 0.6g, respectively, for the mapped maximum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations Ss and S1. This section allows lesser mapped spectral response acceleration values to be used in the case of regular structures five stories or less in height having a period of 0.5 seconds or less. The darkened areas on the maps in Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate those areas of the 48 contiguous states where the reduced values apply. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 As most readers would recall, the Uniform Building Code (UBC), which was published by the International Council of Building Officials, traditionally truncated the value of the seismic zone factor, Z, to 0.4, thereby truncating the effective peak acceleration to 0.4g. The performance record of structures in UBC Seismic Zone 4, which satisfied the restrictions in the paragraph quoted from ASCE 7-02, has by and large been quite satisfactory. The provision under discussion essentially continues this truncation for structures that fall under this restriction. Effective peak acceleration of 0.4g corresponding to the design earthquake of the UBC (10 percent probability of nonexceedance in 50 years) is being taken equivalent to short- and long-period spectral response accelerations corresponding to the Maximum Considered Earthquake of the IBC and ASCE 7 of 0.4g x 1.5 x 2.5 = 1.5g and 0.4g x 1.5 = 0.6g, respectively.

16174 - Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure for Seismic Design of Buildings.pdf

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure Explained

Citation preview

Page 1: 16174 - Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure for Seismic Design of Buildings.pdf

1617.4 - Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure forSeismic Design of Buildings

cenews.com /article/4081/1617.4%ef%bf%bdequivalent_lateral_force_procedure_for_seismic_design_of_buildings

October 2005 » Columns » CODE SIMPLE

The International Code Council’s 2003 International Building Code (IBC) Section 1617.4 refers to theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers’ Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.

S. K. Ghosh, Ph.D.

1617.4—Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure for Seismic Design of Buildings

The International Code Council’s 2003 International Building Code (IBC) Section 1617.4 refers to theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers’ Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-02) Section 9.5.5 for the commonly used equivalent lateral force procedure. At the end of ASCE 7-02Section 9.5.5, there is a very important, and often overlooked provision, which reads as follows:

For regular structures 5 stories or less in height and having a period, T, of 0.5 sec or less, the seismicresponse coefficient, Cs, shall be permitted to be calculated using values of 1.5g and 0.6g, respectively, forthe mapped maximum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations Ss and S1.

This section allows lesser mapped spectral response acceleration values to be used in the case of regularstructures five stories or less in height having a period of 0.5 seconds or less. The darkened areas on themaps in Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate those areas of the 48 contiguous states where the reduced valuesapply.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

As most readers would recall, the UniformBuilding Code (UBC), which was publishedby the International Council of BuildingOfficials, traditionally truncated the value ofthe seismic zone factor, Z, to 0.4, therebytruncating the effective peak acceleration to0.4g. The performance record of structuresin UBC Seismic Zone 4, which satisfied therestrictions in the paragraph quoted fromASCE 7-02, has by and large been quitesatisfactory. The provision underdiscussion essentially continues this truncation for structures that fall under this restriction. Effective peakacceleration of 0.4g corresponding to the design earthquake of the UBC (10 percent probability ofnonexceedance in 50 years) is being taken equivalent to short- and long-period spectral responseaccelerations corresponding to the Maximum Considered Earthquake of the IBC and ASCE 7 of 0.4g x 1.5x 2.5 = 1.5g and 0.4g x 1.5 = 0.6g, respectively.

Page 2: 16174 - Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure for Seismic Design of Buildings.pdf

Answers to FAQs:

Q: My project is a two-story office buildingof masonry (Seismic Use Group I) and islocated in a very seismically active citywhere SS = 2.05g and S1 = 0.911g. Thesite class is B and Fa = 1.0 and Fv = 1.0.Because my building is less than fivestories and has a period less than 0.5second, can I use SS = 1.5g and S1 = 0.6gfor the purpose of assigning the seismicdesign category?

A: Yes, provided your structure isregular.Table 1 provides a comparison ofseismic design category assignments for the different cases.