53
Questions from Lectures, with answers provided by Ron Lee. The list was kindly compiled by a student in the class. Note that there is duplication in the iClicker questions in the following list. I have answered some questions multiple times. Answers are highlighted in red.

16. Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

  • Upload
    duyen

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Questions from Lectures, with answers provided by Ron Lee. The list was kindly compiled by a student in the class. Note that there is duplication in the iClicker questions in the following list. I have answered some questions multiple times. Answers are highlighted in red. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Questions from Lectures, with answers provided by Ron Lee.

The list was kindly compiled by a student in the class.

Note that there is duplication in the iClicker questions in the following list. I have

answered some questions multiple times. Answers are highlighted in red.

Page 2: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 2

16. Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175March 11, 2011

Page 3: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 3

Q. In our simple economy, population growth will always

A. Lead to lower wages.B. Lead to higher rents on land.C. Sometimes lead to lower wages and higher

rentsD. It is impossible to sayE. Two of the above statements are true.(After reaching point of land scarcity where diminishing returns to labor begin).

Page 4: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 4

Lecture 17. Surplus, Optimal Population, and Malthus

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175March 15, 2011

Page 5: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 5

Q1. Outside the region of abundant land, and before the MPL=s, when the population is larger, the income going

to landowners is:A. GreaterB. UnchangedC. SmallerD. Impossible to say

Page 6: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 6

Q2. According to the theory discussed in the last lecture, serfdom or slavery:

A. Can only arise if the land is densely settled. B. Might not arise when the land is sparsely

settled. C. Cannot occur when population is sparse if

there is also a landowning class that does not work.

D. None of the above.

Page 7: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 7

Q3. Which statement about surplus is correct?

A. Total surplus is the difference between total output and the per capita subsistence needs of the population.

B. Surplus always increases as population increases. C. Surplus is greatest at some intermediate size of

population. D. If the weather is bad for agriculture some year, we

would expect surplus to be higher.

Page 8: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 8

Q4. Which statement is true about the optimal size of population under our assumptions?

A. The average person is always better off if the population is smaller.

B. Landowners will always be better off if the population is larger.

C. Workers will always be better off if the population is smaller.D. The population that maximizes military power will always be

larger than the population that maximizes per capita incomeE. The population that maximizes total surplus is less than or

equal to the population that maximizes per capita income.

Page 9: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 9

Q5. If the whole mortality curve is higher, then what happens to w*, the wage at which

population growth is zero?

A. w* will be lower due to the worse health conditions.

B. w* will not change, because it depends on other forces.

C. w* will be higher because fertility will have to be higher to achieve zero population growth.

D. None of the above.

Page 10: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 10

Q6. The Malthusian system is stable which means that if a temporary shock does not

change the relationships, then:

A. All the variables will gradually return to their original values.

B. It will not be displaced even temporarily from equilibrium.

C. It will return to equilibrium, but not necessarily to the same values as before.

Page 11: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 11

Lecture 18. Malthus (cont.)

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175March 17, 2011

Page 12: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 12

Q. The germ theory of disease is accepted and everyone starts washing their hands and boiling

water. At the same time, a law is passed reducing the legal age at marriage from 21 to 18. What happens?

A. The equilibrium wage rises.B. The equilibrium wage falls. C. Either is possible; we can’t say.

Page 13: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 13

Lecture 19. Boserup

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175March 29, 2011

Page 14: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 14

Q. According to Malthus, would a program of breaking up the estates of large land owners and distributing the land to landless workers improve human welfare in the

long term?

A. Yes, poverty would be reduced.B. This program would temporarily reduce poverty but

in the long term, wages would be the same as before. C. The number of poor people would be increased. D. Two of the above. E. All of the above.

Page 15: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 15

Q. A foreign aid program introduces a family planning program and a health care program to a poor Third

World country. What effect on human welfare should we expect from a Malthusian or other perspective?

A. Due to more rapid population growth from lower mortality, welfare will decline.

B. Better health and lower mortality will be of great value in themselves to the people, so their welfare will rise.

C. Population growth rates will fall due to lower fertility, so welfare will be better than otherwise.

D. Each of these three could be defended as an answer, but not all at the same time.

Page 16: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 16

Q. Following Boserup’s thinking, more dense populations might lead to technological progress because

A. Transportation and communications are cheaper in a denser population.

B. The rewards to innovation are greater when population is dense.

C. A denser population can sustain an urban population, which is more likely to be technologically innovative.

D. All of the above. E. Two of the above.

Page 17: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 17

Lecture 21. Pop and Environment (cont.) and start Pop Aging

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 5, 2011

Page 18: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 18

Q. Boserup argues that as population growth makes a resource become more scarce, society defines new

property rights in that resource. Which of the following are examples?

A. LandB. WaterC. Ozone layerD. BiodiversityE. Two of the above

Page 19: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 19

Q. Nonrenewable resources are finite and can be used up, like oil, but renewable resources last forever. True or False?

A. TrueB. FalseC. It depends…

Page 20: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 20

Q. Which of the following would not be an example of natural capital?

A. The hole in the ozone layer.B. A rain forest.C. Sunlight falling on the earth.D. Top soilE. A fishery

Page 21: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 21

Q. Public policy should seek to maximize which of the following, in your opinion?

A. Per capita income.B. A mix of population size and per capita income,

say U=Pop1/2y1/2 .C. A mix of population size, per capita income, and

biodiversity or well-being of other species of plants and animals.

D. Any of the above, but only at a sustainable level.E. Some other criterion.There is no single right answer; this is just asking for your personal view.

Page 22: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 22

Lecture 22. Population Aging

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 7, 2011

Page 23: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 23

Q. Which one of the following statements is true?

A. If one more year of work leads to a higher pension thereafter, then the pension accrual is positive.

B. If pension accrual is positive, then one more year of work leads to a higher pension thereafter.

C. If the implicit tax is positive then pension accrual must be negative.

D. All of the above.E. Two of the above (B and C).

Page 24: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 24

Q. The tax force to retire

A. Is bigger if the implicit tax is generally higher.B. The tax force to retire is higher if the payroll

tax is lower.C. is positively associated with labor force

participation at older ages.D. All of the above.

Page 25: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 25

Q. If the analysis of Gruber and Wise is correct, then which of the following actions

would be expected to raise labor force participation at older ages?

A. reduce payroll tax rates. B. raise the pension benefit level for each

additional year a person works. C. Both of the above.

Page 26: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ron Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 26

Lecture 23. Economics of Aging and Retirement (2)

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 12, 2011

Page 27: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ron Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 27

Q. Which one of the following statements is true? (duplicates an earlier question)

A. If one more year of work leads to a higher pension thereafter, then the pension accrual is positive.

B. If pension accrual is positive, then one more year of work leads to a higher pension thereafter.

C. If the implicit tax is positive then pension accrual must be negative.

D. All of the above.E. Two of the above. (B and C)

Page 28: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ron Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 28

Q. The tax force to retire

A. Is bigger if the implicit tax is generally higher.

B. The tax force to retire is higher if the payroll tax is lower.

C. is positively associated with labor force participation at older ages.

D. All of the above.

Page 29: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ron Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 29

Q. If the analysis of Gruber and Wise is correct, then which of the following actions would be expected to raise

labor force participation at older ages?

A. reduce payroll tax rates. B. raise the pension benefit level for each

additional year a person works. C. Both of the above.

Page 30: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Lecture 23. Finish Retirement, Start Pension Theory

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 19, 2011

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 30

Page 31: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ron Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 31

Q. The tax force to retire

A. Is bigger if the implicit tax is generally higher.

B. The tax force to retire is higher if the payroll tax is lower.

C. is positively associated with labor force participation at older ages.

D. All of the above.

Page 32: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Ron Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 32

Q. If the analysis of Gruber and Wise is correct, then which of the following actions would be expected to raise

labor force participation at older ages?

A. reduce payroll tax rates. B. raise the pension benefit level for each

additional year a person works. C. Both of the above.

Page 33: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Q. In a stationary population, the rate of return is:

A. ZeroB. Minus 100%C. Plus 100%D. UndefinedE. None of the above

(True only if there is no productivity growth.)

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 33

Page 34: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Q. The implicit rate of return

A. Will be higher if the benefits are reduced and the contribution rate stays the same;

B. Will be higher if benefits stay the same and the contribution rate is reduced;

C. Will be higher if mortality is higher and contributions and benefits are the same;

D. None of the above.

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 34

Page 35: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

Q. A defined contribution pension system is

A. A system in which each contributor has his or her own account backed up by real assets, like a IRA.

B. A system in which each contributor pays defined amounts into the system.

C. A system in which each contributor gets a specified benefit level regardless of the contributions he or she has made.

D. A system with a guaranteed implicit rate of return.E. Two of the above. (Note that in a Notional Defined Contribution system, NDC, there are no real assets, however.)

Ronald Lee, UC Berkeley, 2011 35

Page 36: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 36

Lecture 25. Social Security

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 19, 2011

Page 37: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 37

Q. The implicit rate of return

A. Will be higher if the benefits are reduced and the contribution rate stays the same;

B. Will be higher if benefits stay the same and the contribution rate is reduced;

C. Will be higher if mortality is higher and contributions and benefits are the same;

D. None of the above.

Page 38: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 38

Q. A defined contribution pension system is

A. A system in which each contributor has his or her own account, usually backed up by real assets, like an IRA.

B. A system in which each contributor pays defined amounts into the system.

C. A system in which each contributor gets a specified benefit level regardless of the contributions he or she has made.

D. A system with a guaranteed implicit rate of return.E. Two of the above (A and B).

Page 39: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 39

Q. Which of the following statements is true?

A. Our Social Security system is in worse shape than the French system.

B. To fix our system by increasing revenues, we would need to raise the payroll tax by about 8%, starting immediately.

C. Because the US Social Security system is Pay As You Go, it does not have a trust fund.

D. All of the above. E. None of the above.

Page 40: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 40

Q. Which of the following statements are false?

A. The Social Security replacement rate is about 40%.B. The Trust Fund is projected to be exhausted around

2037. C. The payroll tax rate for Social Security is around

25%.D. It violates economic rationality to invest in

government bonds earning only 3% real rate of return when it is possible to earn an average return of 7% in the stock market.

E. Two of the above. (C and D).

Page 41: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 41

Q. Which of the following policy options is really a cut in benefits?

A. Raising the normal age at retirement.B. Reducing the size of the cost of living

adjustment. C. Raising the early age at retirement.D. Indexing the benefit level to inflation rather

than to the nominal wage level. E. All of the above.

Page 42: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 42

Lecture 26. Social Security, and Which Generations Win or Lose Through

Public Transfers?

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 21, 2011

Page 43: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 43

Q. Which of the following statements is true?

A. Our Social Security system is in worse shape than the French system.

B. To fix our system by increasing revenues, we would need to raise the payroll tax by about 8%, starting immediately.

C. Because the US Social Security system is Pay As You Go, it does not have a trust fund.

D. All of the above. E. None of the above.

Page 44: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 44

Q. Which of the following statements are false?

A. The Social Security replacement rate is about 40%.B. The Trust Fund is projected to be exhausted around

2037. C. The payroll tax rate for Social Security is around

25%.D. It violates economic rationality to invest in

government bonds earning only 3% real rate of return when it is possible to earn an average return of 7% in the stock market.

E. Two of the above.

Page 45: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 45

Q. Which of the following policy options is really a cut in benefits?

A. Raising the normal age at retirement.B. Reducing the size of the cost of living

adjustment. C. Raising the early age at retirement.D. Indexing the benefit level to inflation rather

than to the nominal wage level. E. All of the above.

Page 46: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ronald Lee, 2011 46

27. Population and Economic Growth

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 26, 2011

Page 47: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ronald Lee, 2011 47

Q. In a steady state with no technical progress, which growth rates are equal?

A. Per capita income and populationB. Population and total outputC. Capital and PopulationD. Capital and per capita incomeE. Two of the above (B and C)

Page 48: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ronald Lee, 2011 48

Q. Other things equal, if the population growth rate is more rapid then, in steady state,

A. Per capita income is lowerB. Capital per worker is lessC. Per capita income falls without limitD. Total output rises more rapidlyE. One of the above is false (C)

Page 49: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 49

Lecture 28. The Theoretical Basis for Population Policy

Ronald LeeEcon/Demog 175

April 28, 2011

Page 50: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 50

Q. Which Soc Sec policy change would be enough to solve the long term imbalance?

A. Index benefits to prices rather than wagesB. Raise the payroll tax by four percentage

points.C. Raise retirement age from 67 to 70. D. Eliminate the income cap for payroll tax.E. Two of the above. (A and B).

Page 51: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 51

Q. The case for laissez faire regarding fertility rests on which of the following statements?

A. Social welfare is nothing more than the sum of the individual utilities of its members.

B. Individuals strive to maximize their own utilities through the choices they make, including choices about fertility.

C. Parents are altruistic towards their children, so the decisions they make about fertility also reflect their children’s interests.

D. All of the above.E. Two of the above.

Page 52: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 52

Q. What feature of the commons was essential to Hardin’s argument?

A. It was owned in common, so each herder was free to choose how many cows to graze on it.

B. The marginal social cost of adding a cow was greater than the marginal individual cost.

C. When all herders were done making their choices, the total social cost of the last cow exceeded the total social benefit.

D. All of the above.

Page 53: 16.  Consequences of Population Size in Relation to Land

UC Berkeley, Ron Lee, 2011 53

Q. The case for government intervention (against laissez faire) rests on which of the

following statements?

A. The costs and benefits faced by individuals choosing fertility are different than the full social costs and benefits of their fertility.

B. Potential parents will take into account the taxes their children will pay as adults, helping to pay the costs of Social Security.

C. All of the aboveD. None of the above.