Upload
mildred-york
View
228
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1111Chapt
er
Chapt
er Risk and ReturnRisk and Return
Slides Developed by:
Terry FegartySeneca College
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 2
Chapter 11 – Outline (1)
• Why Study Risk and Return? The General Relationship Between Risk and Return Portfolio Theory—Modern Thinking about Risk and
Return The Return on an Investment Returns, Expected and Required Risk—A Preliminary Definition
• Portfolio Theory Review of the Concept of a Random Variable The Return on a Share Investment as a Random
Variable Risk Redefined as Variability Risk Aversion
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 3
Chapter 11 – Outline (2)
Decomposing Risk—Systematic (Market) and Unsystematic (Business-Specific) Risk
Portfolios Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When
Shares Are Added Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta Using Beta—The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) The Security Market Line (SML) The Validity and Acceptance of the CAPM and SML
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 4
Why Study Risk and Return?
• Returns to equity investments (common shares) historically much higher than return to debt investments Equity returns have averaged more than 10% while
debt returns average between 6% and 7%• Inflation also averaged about 4.5% during same time period
• Returns on equity investments much more volatile than returns on debt instruments in short-run
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 5
Why Study Risk and Return?
• Since equity earns much higher return but with higher risk, it would be nice if we could invest and earn high return but reduce risk associated with such investments Investing in portfolios of securities can help manage
risk• Portfolio—collection of financial assets by investors
• We wish to capture the high average returns of equity investing while limiting associated risk as much as possible
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 6
The General Relationship Between Risk and Return • Risk in finance is often considered as
probability of losing some or all of money invested Generally investments that offer higher returns
involve higher risks
• Suppose you could invest in a share that would either return you 15% or a loss of everything (-100%) Also, suppose chance of losing everything is 1% and
chance of earning 15% is 99% Risk associated with this investment is 1% chance of
losing everything
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 7
The General Relationship Between Risk and Return• Investors more or less expect to receive
positive return but they realize there is risk associated with share investments and the chance that they can lose their money
• How much risk is associated with given level of return? Need to define risk in a measurable way
• The definition has to include all probabilities of loss
Have to relate that measurement to return
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 8
Portfolio Theory—Modern Thinking about Risk and Return
• Portfolio theory defines investment risk in a measurable way and relates it to expected level of return from an investment Has had major impact on practical investing
activities
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 9
Modern Portfolio Theory
Harry Markowitz William F. Sharpe Merton Miller
Modern portfolio theory was introduced by Harry Markowitz in 1952. Markowitz, Sharpe & Miller were co-recipients of the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1990 for their pioneering work in portfolio theory
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 10
The Return on an Investment
• The return is what investor receives divided by amount invested
• One-Year Investments The return on a debt investment is:
The return on a share investment is
Interest paid
Loan amountk
1 1 0
0
D +(P -P )
Pk
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 11
Returns, Expected and Required
• Expected return on a share is return investors feel is most likely to occur based on currently available information Anticipated return based on dividends
expected as well as expected future price No rational person makes investment without
some expectation of return
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 12
Returns, Expected and Required
• Required return on a share investment is minimum rate at which investors will purchase or hold shares based on their perceptions of its risk People will only invest if they believe expected return
is at least equal to required return• Different people have different levels of both expected and
required return• Significant investment in a company’s shares occurs only
if expected return exceeds required return for substantial number of investors
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 13
Risk—A Preliminary Definition
• Preliminary definition of investment risk —probability that return will be less than expected Definition includes both negative returns and
positive returns that are lower than expected
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 14
Risk—A Preliminary Definition
• Feelings About Risk Most people have negative feelings about
bearing risk (risk aversion) Risk averse investors prefer lower risk when
expected returns are equal Most people see a trade-off between risk
and return Risk isn't to be avoided, but higher risk
investments must offer higher expect return to encourage investment
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 15
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable
• In statistics, a random variable is the outcome of a chance process and has a probability distribution
•Probability distribution—a representation of all possible outcomes and probability of each
Discrete variables can take only specific variables
Continuous variables can take any value within a specified range
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 16
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable• The Mean or Expected Value—most
likely outcome for the random variable• For symmetrical probability
distributions, mean is the centre of the distribution
• Statistically, mean is weighted average of all possible outcomes
n
i ii=1
X = XP X
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 17
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable—Example
1.0000
0.06254
0.25003
0.37502
0.25001
0.06250
P(X)X
The mean of this distribution is 2, since it is a symmetrical distribution.
Q: If you toss a coin four times what is the chance of receiving heads (x)?
A: The mean of the distribution is:
Exa
mpl
e
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 18
Figure 11.1: Discrete Probability Distribution
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 19
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable• Standard Deviation
Variability—how far a typical observation of the variable is likely to deviate from the mean
• There's is a great deal of difference in variability around the mean for different distributions
• Telephone poles don't vary much in height from pole to pole—actual pole heights are closely clustered around the mean
• Office buildings do vary a great deal in terms of height—widely dispersed around the mean
• Standard deviation indicates how far from the mean a typical observation is likely to fall
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 20
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable• Variance and Standard Deviation
Variance —the average squared deviation from the mean. Variance formula:
n 22
x i ii=1
Var X X X P X
n 2
X x i ii=1
SD X X P X
Standard deviation—the square root of the variance. SD formula:
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 21
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable—Example
1.00SD X =
1.00Var X =
0.250.0625424
0.250.2500113
0.000.3750002
0.250.25001-11
0.250.06254-20
(Xi – )2 x P(Xi)P(Xi)(Xi – )2 Xi X
Since the variance is 1.0, the standard
deviation is also 1.0.
Q: If you toss a coin four times what is the chance of receiving heads (x)?
A: The variance and standard deviation of the distribution is:
Exa
mpl
e
X(Xi – ) X
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 22
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable
• The Coefficient of Variation—the ratio of the standard deviation of a distribution to its mean A relative measure of variation
CV formula:
• For example, if the CV = 0.5, then the typical variation is 50% the size of the mean, or ½
XCVX
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 23
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable—Example
0.5CV =
1.00SDX =
0.250.0625424
0.250.2500113
0.000.3750002
0.250.25001-11
0.250.06254-20
(Xi – )2 x P(Xi)P(Xi)Xi X
The standard deviation is 1.0, the mean is 2, thus the CV is 0.5
Q: If you toss a coin four times what is the chance of receiving heads (x)?
A: The coefficient of variation of the distribution is:
Exa
mpl
e
(Xi – ) X X(Xi – )2
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 24
Review of the Concept of a Random Variable
• Continuous Random Variable Can take on any numerical value within some
range We talk about the probability of an actual
outcome being within a range of values rather than being an exact amount
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 25
Figure 11.2: Probability Distribution for a Continuous Random Variable
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 26
The Return on a Share Investment as a Random Variable• In portfolio theory, the return on a
share investment is considered a random variable Return is influenced by future price of shares
and expected dividends•Both variables uncertain
• Return is a continuous random variable with a low value of -100% but no limit to the high value
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 27
The Return on a Share Investment as a Random Variable• The mean of the distribution of returns is
the share's expected return• The variance and standard deviation
show how likely it is that an actual return will be some distance from the expected value Actual return in a distribution with a large
variance is likely to be different from the mean
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 28
Figure 11.3: The Probability Distribution of the Return on an Investment in Shares of X
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 29
Risk Redefined as Variability
• In portfolio theory risk is defined as variability in return (= standard deviation)
• A high-risk share has high probability of earning return that differs significantly from mean of distribution Low-risk share is more likely to earn return similar to
the expected return
• In practical terms, risk is probability that return will be less than expected
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 30
Figure 11.4: Probability Distributions With Large
and Small Variances
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 31
Figure 11.5: Investment Risk Viewed as Variability of Return Over Time
While both shares have the same expected return, the
high risk share has a greater variability in
returns.
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 32
Risk Aversion
• Risk aversion means investors prefer lower risk when expected returns are equal
• When expected returns are not equal, choice of investment depends on investor's tolerance for risk
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 33
Figure 11.6: Risk Aversion
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 34
Example 11.1: Risk Aversion
Q: Michael Okafor is looking for a single company in which he'll make a substantial investment. He's narrowed his search to two firms, Emera Inc. (a public traded utility) and Astro Tech Corp. (a new high-tech company).
Utility companies are low-risk shares, particularly if they are regulated monopolies
High tech firms are high-risk because new technical ideas can be enormously profitable, complete failures, or anything in-between
Michael has made a discrete estimate of the probability distribution of returns for each share as follows:
Exa
mpl
e
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 35
Example 11.1: Risk Aversion
Evaluate Michael’s options in terms of statistical concepts of risk and return.
Exa
mpl
e
0.151300.0514
0.20300.1512
0.30150.6010
0.2000.158
0.15-100%0.056%
P(kA)kAP(kE)kE
Astro TechEmera Inc.
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 36
Example 11.1: Risk Aversion
A: First calculate the expected return for each company--the mean of each distribution.
15.0%10.0%
130
30
15
0
-100%
kA
0.7
1.8
6.0
1.2
0.3%
kE* P(kE)
19.50.150.0514
6.00.200.1512
4.50.300.6010
0.00.200.158
-15.0%0.150.056%
kA* P(kA)P(kA)P(kE)kE
Astro TechEmera Inc.
Exa
mpl
e
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 37
Example 11.1: Risk AversionE
xam
ple
1.7%SD kE =
2.8Var kE =
0.80.0516414
0.60.154212
0.00.600010
0.60.154-28
0.80.0516-4%6%
(kE – )2 x P(kE)P(kE)(kE – )2(kE – )kE Ek Ek Ek
A: Next, calculate the variance and standard deviation of the return on each of the company’s shares
Emera Inc.
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 38
Example 11.1: Risk AversionE
xam
ple
63.7SD kA =
4,058Var kA =
1,9840.1513,225115130
450.202251530
00.300015
450.20225-150
1,9840.1513,225-115%-100%
(kA – )2 x P(kA)P(kA)(kA – )2(kA – )kA Ak Ak Ak
E AE A
E A
σ σ1.7 63.7CV = = = 0.17 CV = = = 4.25
10.0 15.0k k
Finally, calculate the coefficient of variation for each share's return.
Astro Tech
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 39
Example 11.1: Risk Aversion
A: If Michael considers only expected return, he’ll certainly choose Astro. However, with Emera his investment is relatively safe while with Astro there is a substantial chance he’ll lose everything.
No one but Michael can make the decision as to which investment he should choose. It depends on his degree of risk aversion.
Exa
mpl
e
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 40
Decomposing Risk—Systematic (Market) and Unsystematic (Business-Specific) Risk
• Fundamental truth of investment world Returns on shares tend to move up and down
together• Not exactly together or proportionately
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 41
Decomposing Risk—Systematic (Market) and Unsystematic (Business-Specific) Risk
• Events and Conditions Causing Movement in Returns Some things influence all shares (market
risk)• Political news, inflation, interest rates, war, etc.
Some things influence only particular firms (business-specific risk)
• Earnings reports, unexpected death of key executive, etc. Some things affect all companies within an
industry• Labour dispute, shortage of raw material
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 42
Decomposing Risk—Market and Business-Specific Risk
Comparison of IBM, Boeing and the S&P500
020406080
100120140
10/1
0/20
00
11/1
0/20
00
12/1
0/20
00
1/10
/200
1
2/10
/200
1
3/10
/200
1
4/10
/200
1
5/10
/200
1
6/10
/200
1
7/10
/200
1
8/10
/200
1
9/10
/200
1
10/1
0/20
01
Date
Sto
ck
Pri
ce
02004006008001000120014001600
IBM Boeing S&P500
Ind
ex V
alu
e
Market reopens after World Trade
Center collapses
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 43
Decomposing Risk—Market and Business-Specific Risk
• Movement in Return as Risk Total movement in a share's return is the total risk
inherent in the share
• Separating Movement/Risk into Two Parts A share's risk can be separated into systematic or
market risk and unsystematic or business-specific risk
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 44
Portfolios
• A portfolio is an investor's total share holdings
• Risk and Return for a Portfolio Each share in portfolio has its own expected return
and its own risk Portfolios have their own risks and returns
• Return on a portfolio is a weighted average of returns of individual shares in portfolio
• The risk of a portfolio is variance or standard deviation of probability distribution of portfolio's return
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 45
Portfolios
• The Goal of the Investor/Portfolio Owner Goal of investors: to capture high average
returns of equities while avoiding as much risk as possible• Generally done by constructing diversified
portfolios to minimize portfolio risk for a given return
Investors should be concerned with how shares impact portfolio performance, not with shares' individual performance
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 46
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added
• Diversification means adding different (diverse) shares to a portfolio Can reduce (but not eliminate) risk in
portfolio
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 47
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added
• Business-Specific Risk and Diversification Business-specific risk—series of random
events that push returns of individual shares up or down• Effects cancel each other out when added
together over substantial number of shares• Can be diversified away
• Shares within the portfolio must be from fundamentally different industries
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 48
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added• Market Risk and Diversification
If returns of all shares move up and down more or less together, not possible to reduce risk completely• Market risk can be reduced but never entirely
eliminated
The Portfolio• If we have portfolio that is as diversified as the
market, its return will move in tandem with the market
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 49
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added
Risk
Business-Specific
Risk
Number of Securities
Portfolio Risk
Market Risk
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 50
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added
• The Impact on Portfolio Risk of Adding New Shares If we add a share to portfolio which has
returns positively correlated with portfolio, it will generally add risk to portfolio
If we add a share that is negatively correlated with the portfolio, it will decrease risk of portfolio
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 51
Figure 11.7: Risk In and Out of a Portfolio
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 52
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added
• The Risk of the New Additions By Themselves and in Portfolios Shares with equal stand-alone risk can have
opposite risk impacts on portfolio because of timing of variation in their returns
A share's risk in a portfolio sense is its market risk
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 53
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added• How do we diversify to reduce market
risk in a portfolio? Add shares that move counter cyclically with
the market• Ex; gold mining shares• Unfortunately it's difficult to find many shares that
are negatively correlated with the market• However numerous shares exist that have returns
that are less than positively correlated with the market
• Adding these shares to the portfolio will generally reduce risk somewhat, but will not eliminate it
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 54
Correlation & Risk Reduction
B
AkA
σA σB
kBPerfect Negative Correlation
Perfect Positive Correlation
Less thanPerfect Correlation
To minimize portfolio risk, choose assets that have very low correlations with each other.
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 55
Diversification—How Portfolio Risk Is Affected When Shares Are Added• The Importance of Market Risk
Modern portfolio theory is based on the assumption that investors focus on portfolios rather than on individual shares• How shares affect portfolios depends only on
market risk
• Market Return Small investor with limited investment funds
may diversify by buying Index Participation Units (IPUs) or mutual funds
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 56
Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta
• Share's beta (coefficient) measures its market risk It measures the variation of share's return
which accompanies market's variation in return
Beta does not measure business-specific risk
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 57
Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta
Business-Specific or Unsystematic
Risk
Business-Specific or Unsystematic
Risk
Market or Systematic
Risk
Diversifiable Non- Diversifiable
Total Risk /Standard Deviation
The market will compensate us for market risk, measured by
beta
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 58
Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta• Developing Beta
Beta is developed by determining historical relationship between share's return and return on a market index, such as the S&P/TSX Composite Index
Share's characteristic line reflects the average relationship between its return and the market
•Beta is slope of characteristic line
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 59
Figure 11.8: The Determination of Beta
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 60
Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta
• Beta > 1.0 means the share tends to move more than the market
• A beta 0 - 1.0 means the share moves with the market, but less
• A beta < 0 means the share tends to move against the market Shares in gold mining companies are a real-world
example of negative beta shares
• Beta for a Portfolio Beta for portfolio is weighted average of betas of
individual shares within portfolio
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 61
Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta
Characteristic Line for IBM
y = 1.3037x + 0.0009
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06
Return on S&P500
Ret
urn
on
IBM
Characteristic line determined using data from Slide 38. IBM’s
beta
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 62
Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta
• Projecting Returns with Beta Knowing share's beta enables us to estimate
changes in its return given changes in market's return
However, betas are developed from historical data• May not be accurate if fundamental change in the
business environment occurs
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 63
Example 11.2: Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta
Q: Conroy Corp. has a beta of 1.8 and is currently earning a return of 14%. The stock market in general is reacting negatively to a new crisis in the Middle East. Experts estimate that the return on an average share will drop from 12% to 8%.
Estimate the change in the return on Conroy shares and its new price.
Exa
mpl
e
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 64
Example 11.2: Measuring Market Risk—The Concept of Beta
A: Beta represents the past average change in Conroy’s return relative to changes in the market’s return.
The new return can be estimated as
kConroy = 14% - 7.2% = 6.8%
Conroy ConroyConroy
M
Conroy
k kb or 1.8
k 4%
k = 7.2%
Exa
mpl
e
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 65
Using Beta—The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• CAPM helps us determine how share prices are set in the market
• The CAPM's Approach People won't invest unless a share's expected return
is at least equal to their required return The CAPM attempts to explain how investors'
required returns are determined
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 66
Using Beta—The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)• Rates of Return, The Risk-Free Rate and Risk
Premiums The risk-free rate (kRF)—rate for which there is no
chance of receiving less than what is expected• Current rate of interest on 3-month Treasury bills
Investing in any other investment is risky; thus investors will require return greater than risk-free rate
• Investors want to be compensated for extra risk taken via rate known as the risk premium (kRP)
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 67
Using Beta—The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)• Rates of Return, The Risk-Free Rate and
Risk Premiums Required rate of return is risk-free rate
plus risk premium CAPM attempts to explain how risk premium
in required rates of return is determined
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 68
The Security Market Line (SML)
• SML proposes that required rates of return are determined by:
where: kx is the required return on stock X kRF is the risk-free rate
kM is the return on the market x is stock X’s beta coefficient
X RF M RF X
Market Risk Premium
Stock X's Risk Premium
k k k k b
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 69
The Security Market Line (SML)
• The SML
Market Risk Premium:• Risk premium for an investment in the market as a whole • Reflects investment community's level of risk aversion
Risk Premium for Stock X:• Beta for stock X times the risk premium of the market• Says that risk premium for a share is determined only by the
share's relationship with the market as measured by beta
X RF M RF X
Market Risk Premium
Stock X's Risk Premium
k k k k b
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 70
Figure 11.9: The Security Market Line
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 71
The Security Market Line (SML)
• The SML as a Portrayal of the Securities Market • The SML can be viewed as a straight line:
X RF M RF X
y = b + xm
k k k k b
Slope of the SML reflects general level of risk aversion
Vertical intercept of SML represents investment in risk-free short-term government securities
Given a stock’s beta, we can find its required return by moving up to the SML and left to the return axis
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 72
The Security Market Line (SML)
• The SML as a Line of Market Equilibrium
If, for every share on the SML, expected return equals required return, SML represents equilibrium
If share's expected return becomes less than required return
• Owners of share would want to sell while potential buyers would no longer be interested
• Share price would drop• Expected return would increase, driving it back toward
equilibrium
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 73
The Security Market Line (SML)
• Valuation Using Risk-Return Concepts SML allows us to calculate minimum required rate of
return for a share Return can then be used in the Gordon model to
determine intrinsic value for share
• The Impact of Management Decisions on share Prices Since managers can influence share's beta and
future growth rates, management's decisions impact share price
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 74
Example 11.5: The Security Market Line (SML)
Q: The Kelvin Company paid an annual dividend of $1.50 recently, and is expected to grow at 7% into the indefinite future. Short-term Treasury bills are currently yielding 6%, and the S&P/TSX Composite Index is yielding 10%. Kelvin shares are relatively volatile. Their return tends to move in response to political and economic changes about twice as much as does the return on the average stock. What should Kelvin sell for today?
A: The required rate of return using the SML is:kKelvin = 6 + (10 – 6)2.0 = 14%
Plugging this required rate of return along with the growth rate of 7% into the Gordon model gives us the estimated price:
Exa
mpl
e
00
D 1 g $1.5 1.07P $22.93
k g .14 .07
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 75
Example 11.6: The Security Market Line (SML)
Q: The Kelvin Company has identified a new field into which it can expand using technology it already possesses. The venture promises to increase the firm's growth rate to 9% from the current 7%. However, the project is new and unproven, so there's a chance it will fail and cause a considerable loss. As a result, there's some concern that the stock market won't react favorably to the additional risk. Management estimates that undertaking the venture will raise the firm's beta to 2.3 from its current level of 2.0. Should Kelvin undertake the new project if the firm’s current share price is $22.93?
Exa
mpl
e
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 76
Example 11.6: The Security Market Line (SML)
A: The new required rate of return will be:
kKelvin = 6 + (10 – 6)2.3 = 15.2%Plugging this rate of return along with the higher growth rate of 9% into the Gordon model gives us the new estimated price:
The new estimated price is higher than the $22.93 price before the project. Thus, the venture looks like a good idea.
Exa
mpl
e
00
D 1 g $1.5 1.09P $26.37
k g .152 .09
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 77
The Security Market Line
• Adjustments to Changing Market Conditions Response to change in risk-free rate
• If all else remains the same, increase in the risk-free rate causes corresponding increase in market rate
• Share prices will fall Response to change in risk aversion
• Increase in risk aversion causes increase in risk premium and market return
• Share prices will fall
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 78
Figure 11.10: A Shift in the Security Market Line to Accommodate an Increase in the Risk-Free Rate
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 79
Figure 11.11: A Rotation of the Security Market Line to Accommodate a
Change in Risk Aversion
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited 80
The Validity and Acceptance of the CAPM and SML• CAPM is abstraction of reality designed to help
make predictions Its simplicity has led to its popularity
• Relates risk and return in an easy-to-understand concept
• However, CAPM not universally accepted Continuing debate exists as to its relevance and
usefulness• Fama and French found no historical relationship between
returns on shares and their betas
Risk measured by CAPM (beta) is market risk only