Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
May 2014
1
Regulation Changes that Impact You
New and Proposed FCA Guidance
Abby Wegner, Director of Financial Reporting
Angie Moldestad, Senior Financial Reporting Analyst
May 13, 2014
• Senior Officer Compensation Disclosures – Recent Updates
• Regulatory Capital Changes on the Horizon
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Agenda
2
Discussion regarding changes to Regulatory Capital Ratios is based onexpectations from participants in the System Work Group prior to the
May 8, 2014 action by FCA. Information is consistent with thatpresented at the 2013 AgriBank CFO Conference as no further updates
have been discussed.
May 2014
2
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Senior Officer Compensation DisclosuresRecent FCA updates
3
• On March 13, 2014 the FCA Board approved an interim final rule toremove all requirements related to nonbinding, advisory votes atFarm Credit System institutions.
• The interim final rule removes only the requirements related tononbinding, advisory votes.
• Other recently implemented rules related to Senior OfficerCompensation remained in affect:– Enhanced transparency of compensation disclosures for CEOs and senior officers
– Enhanced responsibilities of the Compensation Committee of the Board ofDirectors
AgriBank District and Association Annual Reports issued on or after March 13, 2014modified the ‘Information Required by Regulations’ section for this change.
All AgriBank District and Association Quarterly Reports prepared by AgriBank FinancialReporting modified the Q1 2014 MD&A to notify shareholders of the change.
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonBackground
4
• Why are capital requirements changing?– Basel III is a result of the financial crisis in 2008; regulators believe one of the
reasons for the crisis was inadequate capital reserves at many financialinstitutions
– Enhanced comparability of Farm Credit System capital to commercial bankswhich may alleviate some of the perceived premium on System third partycapital (subordinated debt and preferred stock)
• Capital Work Group representing System institutions is coordinating withFCA
• Guiding Principles of the Capital Work Group:– FCA’s revised capital framework must not adversely impact the FCS’s cooperative
business model– FCA should not get ahead of other regulators’ capital rulemakings– Implementation of a Basel III framework for the FCS should focus on
permanency of capital available to absorb losses
May 2014
3
• Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1): Highest quality capital,must be the predominant form of Tier 1 capital
• Additional Tier 1 Capital: Must meet specific criteria;absorbs losses without the institution becoming insolvent
• Tier 2: Absorbs losses in insolvency before other creditors
• Non-risk-based Leverage Ratio: Backstop to risk-basedmeasures
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonPrimary Capital Measures
5
• Risk Adjusted Capital Ratios
• Leverage Ratio
CONFIDENTIAL
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonPrimary Capital Measures
6
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital / Risk Adjusted Assets
Tier 1 Capital / Risk Adjusted AssetsTier 1
Capital Ratio
Total Capital / Risk Adjusted AssetsTotal Capital
Ratio
Tier 1 Capital / AssetsTier 1
Leverage
CommonEquity Tier 1
Ratio
May 2014
4
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonPrimary Capital Measures
7
• Overview of Potential Capital Requirements
*Subject to determination by FCA
– Common Equity Tier 1 and Tier 1 Capital Ratio (excluding Conservation Buffer)targeted for 2015 implementation
– Total Capital Ratio (excluding Conservation Buffer) 8.5% - no phase-in date
Total Capital Ratio Subordinated Debt
Tier 1 Capital Ratio Non-cumulative Preferred Stock
Capital Conservation Buffer
Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio Allocated Surplus*Nonqualified Allocated Surplus*Unallocated Retained EarningsAssociation Investment in District Bank*Paid-in-CapitalCommon Stock-Protected*Common Stock-Allocated*Common Stock-Purchased
10.5%
8.5%
7.0%
4.5%
• Capital Conservation Buffer required above the minimum capital requirement in
Basel III to lessen bank vulnerability to financial cycles
• If the buffer falls short of the 2.5% requirement, association/bank is subject to
restrictions on payout in form of patronage or discretionary bonus payments as
a percent of eligible retained income, as shown in the table below
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonPrimary Capital Measures
8
• The maximum payout amount would be calculated as of the last day of the prior
quarter and restrictions applied during the current quarter.
– Notwithstanding the above, agencies retain their authority to permit banks to make
capital distributions or discretionary bonus payments consistent with safety and
soundness.
Capital Conservation Buffer Maximum Payout RatioGreater than 2.5% No Limitation
1.875% < CCB <= 2.5% 60%
1.25% < CCB <= 1.875% 40%
0.625% < CCB <= 1.25% 20%
Less than or equal to 0.625% 0%
May 2014
5
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonImpact to Risk Adjusted Assets
9
• Adjustments to Risk Adjusted Assets (RAA)– Residential Mortgage Loans – Maintains current treatment (50%)
– Rural Electric Loans – Risk-weight may increase – TBD (currently 50%)
– Loans Past Due 90+ and Nonaccrual Loans – Risk-weight 150% (currently100%)
– Retail Unfunded Commitments < 14 mo – Risk-weight 20% (currently notincluded)
– Certain acquisition development and construction loans – Risk-weight 150%(currently 100%)
• Basel III Approach: Final Rule resorts back to current practice– 50% risk weight for prudently underwritten residential mortgages
– 100% for other residential mortgages and Nonaccrual loans or past due 90+days loans
– More regulations expected
• Implication to FCS: Most rural home loans today are 50% riskweighted
• Workgroup Recommendation: Adopt the Basel III approach
• Estimated Impact on RAA: Impact is a very little to modestincrease in RAA– Less than 50bps increase to RAA on average
– 13 associations have greater than a 1% increase in RAA (1.2% - 7.8%)
– 10 of these are in the AgFirst District
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Rural Residential Mortgages
10
May 2014
6
• Preparation by AgriBank Financial Reporting:– Project Implemented in October 2013 to capture via Hyperion member
rather than memo accounts
• Other Potential Changes:– Additional bifurcation will be needed for delinquency and accrual status for
all Rural Residential Mortgages – exists in Hyperion District Reporting Cube,but does not exist in the Hyperion Finance Cube
– Modification of Monthly Management Report Model, Shareholder ReportModel, and related Hyperion members to reflect the change in riskweighting
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Rural Residential Mortgages
11
• Basel III Approach: Not specifically addressed; therefore, woulddefault to 100% risk weighting
• Implication to FCS: Currently the FCA allows 50% weighting for asignificant portion of loans to Rural Electric Co-ops
• Workgroup Recommendation: Preserve the 50% weighting giventhe low risk profile of these loans
• Estimated Impact on RAA: The risk weighting would double forthose System institutions with Rural Electric loans.– 28 associations have rural electric exposures and their RAA would increase
by 0.5% on average (range from 0.2% to 1.5%)
– Eight Associations in AgriBank District affected
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Rural Electric Loans
12
May 2014
7
• Preparation by AgriBank Financial Reporting:– Project Implemented in October 2013 to capture via Hyperion member
rather than memo accounts
• Other Potential Changes:– Modification of Monthly Management Report Model, Shareholder Report
Model, and related Hyperion members to reflect the change in riskweighting
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Rural Electric Loans
13
• Basel III Approach: Loans (excluding residential mortgages loans)90+ days past due or in nonaccrual must be risk weighted 150%– Portions secured by financial collateral may be assigned a risk weight
applicable to that collateral (e.g., 0% for cash collateral)
• Implication to FCS: An increase in the risk weight for past due andnonaccrual loans as the current risk weight is 100%.
• Workgroup Recommendation: Adopt Basel III approach
• Estimated Impact on RAA: Modest increase in RAA given theSystem’s generally low level of nonperforming loans– Increase in RAA of 0% - 5% with an average of 0.3% for Banks and 0.8% for
Associations.
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Loans Past Due 90+ and Nonaccrual Loans
14
May 2014
8
• Preparation by AgriBank Financial Reporting:– Project Implemented in May 2014 to capture via Hyperion member rather
than memo accounts
• Other Potential Changes:– Identification of delinquency by collateral type
– Modification of Monthly Management Report Model, Shareholder ReportModel, and related Hyperion members to reflect the change in riskweighting
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Past Due and Nonaccrual
15
• Basel III Approach: 20% weighting for unfunded commitments<12 months; 50% for >12 months; 0% weighting forunconditionally cancelable commitments– Unconditionally Cancelable Commitments: commitment where funding may
be withheld for any reason and without cause
• Implication to FCS: Change will increase RAA. Current riskweighting is 0% for unused commitments with original maturity<14 months; 20% for trade-related contingencies; 50% for unusedcommitments >14 months
• Workgroup Recommendation: Adopt Basel III approach, butextend definition of short term commitment to <14 months
• Estimated Impact on RAA (assuming 14 month break point):Increases RAA for all System institutions.– Ranges from an RAA increase of less than 0.25% to about 10% at CoBank
– On average, associations seem to have about a 2% increase in RAA
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Retail Unfunded Commitments
16
May 2014
9
• Preparation by AgriBank Financial Reporting:– Project Implemented in October 2013 to capture Unfunded Commitments
less than 14 months
– Project has provided a completeness check to Total Commitments
• Other Potential Changes:– If FCA uses the Basel III threshold of 12 months, Hyperion logic will need to
be revised and likely new Hyperion members will need to be created
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight: Retail Unfunded Commitments
17
• Unless specifically identified, loans are risk weighted 100%
• High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Loans – 150%
– Exception for agricultural land if valuation based on agriculturaluse and does not take into account potential non-agriculturaluse
– FCA will look for “curbs and utilities” in timber loans
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight - Other
18
May 2014
10
• Preparation by AgriBank Financial Reporting:– No Changes to Date
• Other Potential Changes:– If High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Loans need to be bifurcated and
risk weighted differently, this will require a project to identify appropriatecoding in the loan system, development of Hyperion members, and likelyupdates/changes to all Financial Reporting Models used in the BusinessService
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonRisk Weight - Other
19
• Basel III approach: Detailed on next slide
• Implication to FCS: Detailed on following slide
• Workgroup Recommendation: Follow Basel III and eliminateprovisions that are clearly not applicable to FCS. Initial reviewindicates only two risk weights are applicable to Systeminstitutions: (1) 20% risk weight for GSE equity investments (i.e.,Farmer Mac); and (2)100% risk weight for equity exposures notsubject to numerator deduction and adjustment provisionsrelating to intra-System investments in unconsolidated financialinstitutions (i.e., banks and associations).
• Estimated Impact on RAA: Insignificant impact today.
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonEquity Exposures
20
May 2014
11
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonEquity Exposures
21
Investment Current FCA Regs Basel IIIFarmer Mac Common 20% risk weight 20% risk weight
100% RW for Preferred Stock425 Service Corp Full deduction
§615.5207(f)100%
Funding Corporation 20% 100%Captive Insurer 100% 100%Building Association 100% (akin to premises
& equip)615.5211(d)(5)
100%
AgDirect(associated with lending soshould be full deduct)
Full deduction Full deduction
Unincorporated BusinessEntities
100% 100% (non‐significant equity exposures)
Rural Bus Invest Co 100% 100% (akin to communitydevelopment fund & SBIC)
Rural Equity Fund 100% 100% (akin to communitydevelopment invest & non‐ significant exposures)
• Basel III approach: Complex requirements around significant and non-significant investments in unconsolidated financial institutions (i.e., banks andassociations)
• Implication to FCS: Significantly favorable given under Basel III deductions arealways less than the current requirement for full deduction
• Workgroup recommendation: Continue with current regulatory approach offull deduction of Intra-System investments between banks and associationsgiven the interconnected and financial interdependency of the System
• Estimated impact on RAA: None, based on workgroup recommendation
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonInvestments in Unconsolidated Financial Institutions
22
Investment in: FCA Regs Propose for new RegsAssn investment in Bank Full deduction Full deduction
Bank investment in Assn Full deduction Full deduction
Bank investment in Bank Full deduction Full deduction
May 2014
12
Preliminary & Estimated Risk Adjusted Assets (data from June 30, 2013)
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonPotential Impact to Associations
23
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
Risk Adjusted Assets - Current
Risk Adjusted Assets - Basel III
GreenStone
ACAAgStar
ACA
NorthDakota
ACA Delta ACAMandan
ACA
FarmCreditIllinois
ACA
FCS ofAmerica
ACAMidsouth
ACA
WesternArkansas
ACABadgerland
ACAAgHeritage
ACAProgressive
FCS, ACAAgCountry
ACA
1st FarmCredit
Services,ACA
UnitedACA
FCSFinancial,
ACA
FarmCreditMid-
AmericaACA
1% 4% 1% 3% 3% 2% 5% 3% 0% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2%
• Calculating impact to Permanent Capital Ratio (PCR)
– Assume Association PCR is currently 15.0%
– Due to implementation of new Basel III definitions and riskweights, Risk Adjusted Assets increase by 3.0%
– New PCR = 15/103 = 14.56%
– PCR would decline by .44% due to changes in RAA
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonPotential Impact to Associations
24
May 2014
13
• The largest issue for the System is treatment of cooperative capital
• Basel III defines Common Equity Tier 1 based on 13 specific criteria– Some of these criteria are not applicable or not appropriate for cooperative
organizations
• Basel III allows regulators to take into consideration the uniquecharacteristics of cooperative’s capital, and to define conditionsunder which cooperative capital will qualify as Common EquityTier 1
• FCA indicates they view the lesser of 2% or $1,000 purchased stockas Common Equity Tier 1– European regulators have allowed purchased member stock of immaterial
amounts relative to the size of loans to be counted as CET1
• Treatment of allocated equities are to be determined
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonCapital – Cooperative Equities
25
• System Cooperative Equities– Allocated stock: allocations of capital stock classes resulting
from patronage distributions– Qualified allocated surplus: earned surplus outstanding that has
been specifically allocated to the reporting institution’sstockholders which resulted from patronage distributions
– Nonqualified allocated surplus: All patronage allocations orother allocations of earnings designated to the institution’sstockholders, and were not deducted from the gross taxableincome of the allocating institution
• Approximately 20%-25% of System Net Worth is comprised ofCooperative Equities– Exclusion of this equity could be detrimental to many Farm Credit
Institutions
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonCapital – Cooperative Equities
26
May 2014
14
• Basel III Approach: Total Capital includes Allowance for Loan andLease Losses up to 1.25% of Risk Adjusted Assets (part of Tier 2Capital)
• Implication to FCS: Current Regulatory Capital Ratios do not countAllowance as capital
• Workgroup Recommendation: Adopt the Basel III Approach
• Estimated Impact: Under current accounting rules, overall minimalimpact
– AgriBank District Allowance is approximately 0.35% of RiskAdjusted Assets
– Association Allowance as percentage of Risk Adjusted Assetsranges from 0.11% to 0.69% of RAA
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonCapital – Allowance
27
• Basel III Approach:
• Implication to FCS: Conceptually similar to current regulatory approach,with Preferred Stock and Subordinated Debt appropriately treated basedon their relative quality for absorbing losses– Noncumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock is currently part of Core Surplus, but it
will not be included in CET1– Subordinated debt receives capital treatment in the NCR, but not in the Basel III
Leverage Ratio
• Workgroup Recommendation: Adopt the Basel III Approach• Estimated Impact: Overall minimal impact in the treatment of third
party capital, except Noncumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock will nolonger be treated as the highest quality capital as it is today andSubordinated Debt will not provide relief for the Leverage Ratio
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonCapital - Preferred Stock and Subordinated Debt
28
Perpetual Noncumulative Preferred Tier 1 Capital
Perpetual Cumulative Preferred Tier 2 Capital
Subordinated Debt Tier 2 Capital
May 2014
15
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT
Regulatory Capital Changes on the HorizonSummary Potential Impact to Associations
29
• Higher capital requirements– Common Equity Tier 1 – 4.5%– Total Capital – 8.0%– Capital Conservation Buffer adds 2.5% to above minimum ratios– Leverage Ratio – 4.0%– Risk-Adjusted Assets will increase (generally)
• Increased financial disclosures and additional data in Call Reportslikely
• Implementation date may be contingent on FCA’s treatment ofcooperative shares– May 8, 2014 FCA Board meeting is expected to take action and provide rules
for comment
DISTRIBUTION: AGRIBANK DISTRICT 30
For questions or comments, please contact:Angie Moldestad at [email protected] or 651-282-8313
Abby Wegner at [email protected] or 651-282-8732
May 2014
16
The next presentation will begin in a moment!