Upload
kathleen-evans
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
NW Regional Public Utility Behavior Based Energy Efficiency Programs Conference Call September 29, 2011
“Western Mass Saves” Program Overview“Western Mass Saves” Program Overview
Tony FornutoTony FornutoResidential Program AdministratorResidential Program AdministratorWestern Massachusetts Electric Co.Western Massachusetts Electric Co.
Facilitated by Summer Goodwin, BPA
““Western Mass Saves” Western Mass Saves” Program OverviewProgram Overview
Tony FornutoTony FornutoResidential Program AdministratorResidential Program Administrator
Western Massachusetts Electric Co.Western Massachusetts Electric Co.
Service Territory and Target AreaService Territory and Target AreaService Territory
• Customers: 182,000+ residential
• Communities: 59 cities and towns
• Service area: 1,500 square miles
Target Area (initial)
• Treatment territory includes 8 communities:
• Agawam• Amherst/Pelham• Easthampton• Ludlow• Montgomery• Springfield• Sunderland• West Springfield
4
More savings & less cost through deep customer engagement
Direct recruitment of customers online for ongoing engagement through personalized savings recommendations and information
Rewards given to customers based on energy saved
Aggregate and individual savings tracked on a monthly basis using best practice bill analysis with comparison control groups
4
Program OverviewProgram OverviewMulti-channel approach to capture broad and deep savings
Direct mail
Targeted email communication
Advanced web experience
Local community teams, contests and prizes
55
Program OverviewProgram Overview
Goal: engage 5,000 customers Online platform goes live
November 2010 25,000 customers selected to
receive reports 25,000 customer selected as
“control” (do not receive reports)
Reports designed to drive to online engagement
Example: Western Mass Saves Challenge
Towns compete to achieve 3% kWh savings
Local messaging, events and prizes
Online community pages and leader boards
Winning towns receive free solar panels on public building
Community Engagement: Towns and CitiesCommunity Engagement: Towns and Cities
8
Example: Amherst Classroom Challenge
Students sell EE products and acquire households into program
Revenue goes back to school EE efforts
Classrooms and schools compete based on total EE delivered and number of households acquired into online program
Community Engagement: Schools and ClassroomsCommunity Engagement: Schools and Classrooms
9
10
““Surround Sound” MarketingSurround Sound” Marketing
Local media Schools challenges
Teams Rewards merchant collateral
Press Web ads
Community events Search engine marketing
ENERGY STAR Lights Catalog Social media
Opportunistic campaigns Refer-a-friend
15
Opportunistic Messaging Drives Deeper Engagement…Opportunistic Messaging Drives Deeper Engagement…
Using Direct Mail as a Tool for EngagementUsing Direct Mail as a Tool for Engagement
Benchmark Mailer-“Usage Comparison”
resulting in a 0.51% conversion
rate
Using Direct Mail as a Tool for EngagementUsing Direct Mail as a Tool for Engagement
Online Rewards 6% conversion rate
23
Points Offered/Converted CustomersPoints Offered/Converted Customers
Points Offered ConversionRate
<150 3.05%
151-300 3.39%
301-450 4.69%
451-600 4.94%
601-750 5.91%
The number of reward points offered is the largest factor in convertingcustomers from direct mail to active engagement
Energy Savings: Direct Mail Impact
Verified kWh savings (%) est. 0.98% as of 6/15
Projected annual kWh savings (%) est. 1-2%
Households 59,019 / 99,019*
Conversion to online 0.2 – 5.9%
Opt-out rate 0.1% (61 total)
* “Households” receiving mail at least once
Energy Savings: Online Participants Online program
Verified kWh savings (%) est. 4.2% as of 6/15
Projected annual kWh savings (%) est. 3.5 – 6.5%
Online members 6,142
Ways to save marked as “doing” or “done” 14 per member
Customer satisfaction increase 7-11%
Monthly email open rate 53%
Percent of members who say WMS has led to taking efficiency measures
94%
26
Positive Customer ReactionsPositive Customer Reactions“The thing that I like most about Western Mass Saves is the ability to save money and even earn prizes if successful. The competitive edge in me likes those kinds of challenges. I also enjoy saving money and look at it as a challenge as well.
We had Jeff come out and go through our house for the free energy audit and that was wonderful. He told us things about our home that we didn’t even know.
We also were able to replace all our light bulbs with the CFL ones, so I anticipate that will show up as a reduction on future electric bills… Participating in this program makes me feel closer to WMECo and that maybe I have some control over the costs.”
-Teresa B., Pittsfield, MA
27
Positive Customer ReactionsPositive Customer Reactions
“The program is a great way for the Company to interact with its customers… I think it tells me the Company is trying to work with customers to try to find ways for all of us to save.”
“I like the fact the site provides ideas on ways to save electric use. Many I had already adopted but there were several that allowed me to increase my potential savings.”
“I’d really like to see more options available for the customer in terms of uses for the points we earn in the savings process.”
-Tom N., West Springfield, MA
Online channel seems more cost-effective and scalable than printed report channel
Rewards seem to be driving increased customer satisfaction and increased energy efficiency benefits for online participating customers
Strong engagement with customers (over 50% email open rate) but very little discernible call center impact due to vendor program support management
Third party evaluation needed to confirm savings and persistence
Expand local business, non-profit and service organization engagement with energy saving “teams”
Lessons Learned and Next Steps
28
Large-Scale Data Analysis leverages usage data and other data sources to provide accurate, timely and robust verified energy savings
Best practice Experimental and Quasi-Experimental design
“Opt-in” analysis eliminates selection bias through “rolling control” method
Data being reviewed by academics at Harvard and Stanford
Program being evaluated Opinion Dynamics, and ACEEE
Planning independent interim and final evaluations for pilot period
Evaluation OverviewEvaluation Overview
30
Statistical tests determine heterogeneity in participant versus control bills
Regressions run for mean usage, geography, property characteristics, demographic characteristics, etc. to filter any biases
Temporal constraints imposed for rolling control group, with minimum of 500 control customers in each period
Bills normalized for duration through daily use values
“Passive” savings from customers who receive direct marketing, but do not sign up online executed through traditional experimental design, with random assignment
Control Group ConsiderationsControl Group Considerations
31
Gross Verified Electricity Savings: Program participants versus control group (difference of differences analysis)
Gross Deemed Savings: Total Deemed Savings from program participants
Net Deemed Savings: Total Deemed Savings minus difference of deemed savings between program participants and control group
Net Verified Electricity Savings: Gross Verified Electricity Savings minus Net Deemed Savings
Resource MetricsResource Metrics
32
Acquisition Metrics
Website hits
Web sign-ups from Mailer and No-Mailer customers
Mailer customer opt-outs
Activation Metrics
Rewards program registration
Savings plan commitments
Engagement Metrics
Cross program referrals
Number and most common committed actions
Estimated resource savings from committed actions
Non-Resource (Process) Metrics
33
Contact Info:Contact Info:
Tony FornutoWestern Massachusetts Electric Co.Telephone: 413.787.9329Email: [email protected]