Optimization The Use of Artificial Lighting at Architectural Design Studios in Architecture Study Program of Universitas Syiah Kuala

Muhammad Heru Arie Edytia1, Erna Meutia2, Zulhadi Sahputra3, Muhammad AlmuhtadiBillah4, Putroe Shafwa5

12345 Architecture, Department of Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala

muhammad.heru@unsyiah.ac.id

Urban Retrofitting: Building, Cities and Communities in The Disruptive Era

The 20th

International Conference on

SustainableEnvironment

& Architecture

Supported By:Organized By:Presenter Affiliation:

INTRODUCTION & LITERATURE REVIEW

Architecture students of Unsyiah conduct workshops which require illuminance at least600 lux at three studio, studio A, studio C, and studio D

Based on the results of the evaluation conducted by Jamil (2018) about natural lightingand further artificial lighting measurement, the existing lighting was not optimal.

Therefore, this study aims to optimize the use of artificial light in architectural designstudio more effectively and efficiently.

2

Supported By:Organized By:

INTRODUCTION & LITERATURE REVIEW

Figure 1. (a) Studio A interior; (b) Studio C interior; (c) Studio D interior

3

Supported By:Organized By:

METHODS

4

Supported By:Organized By:

This optimization study was carried out through the (1) existing 3D modeling, (2) measurement of illuminance, (3) model exploration, and (4) simulation using Dialux evo9.0.

METHODS

5

Supported By:Organized By:

This optimization study was carried out through the (1) existing 3D modeling, (2) measurement of illuminance, (3) model exploration, and (4) simulation using Dialux evo9.0.

1.310 cm

850 cm

360 c

m

360 cm

1.310

cm1.690 cm

1.310

cm

850 cm

360 cm

Figure 2. existing 3D modelling

METHODS

6

Supported By:Organized By:

This optimization study was carried out through the (1) existing 3D modeling, (2) measurement of illuminance, (3) model exploration, and (4) simulation using Dialux evo9.0.

Figure 3. Lux meter measurement position in (a) Studio A; (b) Studio C; (c) Studio D

METHODS

7

Supported By:Organized By:

This optimization study was carried out through the (1) existing 3D modeling, (2) measurement of illuminance, (3) model exploration, and (4) simulation using Dialux evo9.0.

Figure 4. Rearrangement of drawing table position in (a) Studio A; (b) Studio C; (c) Studio D

METHODS

8

Supported By:Organized By:

This optimization study was carried out through the (1) existing 3D modeling, (2) measurement of illuminance, (3) model exploration, and (4) simulation using Dialux evo9.0.

Figure 5. (a) Set model location (b) choosing lamp fitting in light menu (c) Result on surface feature

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

9

Supported By:Organized By:Table 1. (a) Illuminance Measurement at Studio A (b) Illuminance Measurement at Studio C (c) Illuminance Measurement at Studio D

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

10

Supported By:Organized By:Figure 6. (a) Illuminance simulation result at studio A (b) Illuminance on drawing table surface (c) exploration of lighting at studio A

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

11

Supported By:Organized By:Figure 7. (a) Illuminance simulation result at studio C (b) Illuminance on drawing table surface (c) exploration of lighting at studio C

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

12

Supported By:Organized By:Figure 8. (a) Illuminance simulation result at studio D (b) Illuminance on drawing table surface (c) exploration of lighting at studio D

CONCLUSIONS

13

Supported By:Organized By:

The illuminance existing of artificial lighting in the three studios on the drawing tablesurface were minimum 280 lux and maximum of 600 lux.

Through 3D modelling simulated by Dialux evo 9.0, rearrangement of drawing tableconfiguration, lamp type and position exploration without changing space height, it couldget the desired illuminance (600 – 750 lux) according to the standard.

The type of lamp used was the Philips Maxos Fusion LL512X 1 xLED31S / 940 DA25W.Lighting was placed in the middle of the cluster consist of 4 drawing table so that it need24 units in Studio A, 42 units in studio C, and 24 units in studio D.

REFERENCES

14

Supported By:Organized By:

Jamil, A., Sari, L.H., Meutia, E., Evaluation of Natural Light Levels in Architectural Design Studio, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Rebuilding Place; 2018; 338-344

Chandra, T., & Amin, A. R. Z. (2017). Simulasi Pencahayaan Alami dan Buatan dengan Ecotect Radiance pada Studio Gambar; Kasus Studi: Studio Gambar Sekolah Tinggi Teknik Musi Palembang. Jurnal Arsitektur KOMPOSISI, 10(3), 171. https://doi.org/10.24002/jars.v10i3.1112

Husain, F.H., Husri, Z., Amani, F., Environmental Psychology: An Analysis on Lighting Efficiency of the Architecture Studio in UiTM Perak, Proceedings of Postgraduate Conference on Global Green Issues (Go Green); 2015; 113-118

Che-Ani, A. I., Tawil, N. M., Musa, A. R., Yahaya, H., & Tahir, M. M. (2012). The Architecture Studio of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia(UKM): Has the Indoor Environmental Quality Standard Been Achieved? Asian Social Science, 8(16), 174.https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p174

Mandala, Ariani. (2019). Lighting Quality In The Architectural Design Studio (Case Study: Architecture Design Studio at UniversitasKatolik Parahyangan, Bandung, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 238. 012032. 10.1088/1755-1315/238/1/012032.

Satwiko, P. (2009). Fisika Bangunan. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.

Anonim. SNI 03-2396-2001, Tata Cara Perancangan System Pencahayan Alami Pada Bangunan Gedung.

Thank You

The 20th International Conference on Sustainable Environment & Architecture

Supported By:Organized By:Presenter Affiliation: