Determines Final Rating CalibratesRecommends Results of the
Assessment OPCR
Slide 8
Slide 9
Slide 10
Slide 11
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
Slide 15
Slide 16
Slide 17
Slide 18
Slide 19
Slide 20
Slide 21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
Slide 24
Sample SPMS RATING SCALE for Efficiency N umerical
AdjectivalDescription 5Outstanding 130% & above of the targeted
quantity acted 4 Very Satisfactory 115% to 129.99% of the targeted
quantity acted 3Satisfactory 100% to 114.99% of the targeted
quantity acted 2Unsatisfactory 51% to 99.99% of the targeted
quantity acted 1Poor 50% & Below of the targeted quantity
acted
Slide 25
Sample SPMS RATING SCALE for Timeliness
NumericalAdjectivalDescription 5Outstanding Task completed ahead of
the planned time by 30% 4 Very Satisfactory Task completed ahead of
the planned time by 15% to 29.99% 3Satisfactory Task completed on
deadline or planned time or earlier but not more than 14.99% of the
planned time. 2Unsatisfactory Task completed after the deadline or
planned time by 51% to 99.99% 1Poor Task not completed fater the
deadline or planned time by 50.99% or more
Slide 26
How to compute the final rating of the office/individual
performances? Example: If the agency adopts the following weight
allocation: Strategic Priorities 45% Core Functions 45% Support
Functions 10%
Slide 27
Sample Computation 45% Strategic Priorities (Roadmap &
PGS), 45% Core Functions, and 10% Support Functions
CategoryMFORating SP4 1+1+1+2 = 5/4 = 1.25 x 45% =.56 Core Function
2 1 + 3 = 4/2 = 2 x 45% =.9 Support Function 1 4 x 10% =.4
Total/Final Overall Rating.56 +.9 +.4 = 1.86 Final Average Rating
N/A Adjectival Rating Unsatisfactory
Slide 28
28 Performance Rewarding and Development Planning Performance
Planning and Commitment Performance Monitoring and Coaching
Performance Review and Evaluation
