52
1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

1

Modern Technologies forTracking the Baseball

Alan NathanUniversity of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

Page 2: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

2

Here’s what I’ll talk about:

• Brief review of baseball aerodynamics

• The new technologies– Camera-based systems:

• PITCHf/x and HITf/x:

– Doppler radar-based systems:• TrackMan

• Using these technologies for analysis– Lots of examples

Page 3: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

3

Review of Baseball Aerodynamics Forces on a Spinning Baseball in Flight

D2

D C1

ˆF = - ρAv v2

2LM

1ˆ ˆF = ρAv (ωC v)

2

v

ω

mgFD

FM

• Drag slows ball down

• Magnus + mg deflects ball from straight line

See Michael Richmond’s talk

Page 4: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

4

Example: Bonds’ record home run

Page 5: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

5

Familiar (and not so familiar) Effects:

• Drag– Fly balls don’t travel as far (factor of ~2!)– Pitched balls lose ~10%

• Magnus– Movement on pitches (many examples later)– Batted balls

• Backspin longer fly balls; tricky popups• Topspin nosedive on line drives; tricky

grounders• Sidespin balls curve toward foul pole

Page 6: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

6

PITCHf/x and HITf/xTwo video cameras @60 fps• “high home” and “high first”• tracks every pitch in every MLB ballpark

– data publicly available

• tracks initial trajectory of batted ball– data not publicly available

Image, courtesy of Sportvision

Marv White, Physics,UIUC, 1969

Page 7: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

7

PITCHf/x and HITf/x• Used for TV broadcasts, MLB Gameday, analysis,…• See http://www.sportvision.com/baseball.html

Page 8: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

8

Camera Registration• T(x,y,z) screen coordinates (u,v)• 7 parameters needed for T

– Camera location (xC,yC,zC)– Camera orientation (pan, tilt, roll)– Magnification (focal length of zoom lens)

Page 9: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

9

Details of Tracking Process

• Each camera image determines LOP

• If cameras were synchronized– LOP intersection (x,y,z)

• Cameras not synchronized– Need a clever idea

Page 10: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

10

Sportvision’s Clever Idea

• Physics trajectory is smooth• Parametrize smooth trajectory mathematically

– e.g., constant acceleration (9 parameters)

• Adjust parameters to fit pixel data– We then have full trajectory

1

z

y

x

T

1

v

u

k

Page 11: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

11

Possible Parametrizations

• Constant acceleration– x(t) = x0 +vx0t + ½axt2 (etc. for y,z)– Solve simultaneous linear equations for 9P– This is scheme used in PITCHf/x

• Constant “jerk”– x(t) = x0 +vx0t + ½ax0t2 +1/6jxt3

– Solve simultaneous linear equations for 12P

• “exact”– Non-linear least-squares fit to get 9P*

x0,y0,z0,vx0,vy0,vz0,Cd,Cl,

Page 12: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

12

9P vs. Exact Trajectory

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

t

-135

-130

-125

-120

-115

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

vy (ft/s) v

t (sec)

x(t) vy(t)

Many studies like this show that 9P works extremely well

Page 13: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

13

z vertically up

All useful parameters derived from 9P• Release point NOT measured

• x0,z0 are locations at y0=50 ft• easily extrapolated to 55 ft

• Derived parameters• v0, vf = speed at y=50,HP• px, pz: = location at y=HP• pfxx, pfxz = movement y=40-HP• spin axis = related to direction of movement• Cd, Cl related to vf/v0 , pfx

• Spin rpm is NOT measured• but approximate value inferred from pfx values

Page 14: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

14

PITCHf/x Precison:A Monte Carlo Simulation

• Start with exact trajectories

• Use cameras to get pixels

• Add random “noise” (1 pixel rms)

• Get 9P and derived quantities

• Compare with the exact quantities

Page 15: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

15

• Central values close to exact 9P works well

• 1 pixel rms rms on following quantities:v0 : 0.23 mph ; x0, z0 : 0.4” ; px, pz: 0.7” ; pfx_x, pfx_z: 1.6”

v0

x0px

pfx_xexact-inferred

Page 16: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

16

Some Comments on Registration • In-game monitors

– “blue-field” vs. actual field– LOP error

Page 17: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

17

Registration Studies in Progress

• Could accuracy be improved with additional “pole” calibrations?

• Can the data themselves be used to recalibrate the cameras?– An example follows

Page 18: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

18

Drag Coefficient: Anaheim, 2009

Camera registrations changed between days 187,188

188187

187188*

Page 19: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

19

Some Remarks on Hitf/x

• Pixel data fit to constant velocity (6P)– Not enough of trajectory to do any better

• Impact location inferred from intersection of pitched and batted ball trajectories

• BBS and VLA are systematically low due to drag and gravity– Not a big effect– One could correct for it fairly easily

• Balls hitting ground in field of view are somewhat problematic

Page 20: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

20

Phased Array Doppler Radar: TrackMan

Page 21: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

21

TRANSMITTER

RECEIVER

FTX

FTX

FRX

V

VR

fd

fd = FTX-FRX = 2*VR*FTX/c

Measurement principle IDoppler Frequency

fD = Doppler Shift = FTX - FRX = 2FTX(VR/c)

Example: FTX = 10.5 GHz; c=0.67 Gmph; VR=90 mphfD = 2.82 kHz

Page 22: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

22

Doppler shift Radial velocity

Time

Pitched ball

Batted ball

Frequency/Velocity vs. Time

Bat

Bounce

Page 23: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

23

Measurement principle IIPhase Shift

TRANSMITTER

RECEIVER 1

FTX

FTX

FRX1fd1

(fd1 ) - (fd2) = 2**sin()*D*FTX/cRECEIVER 2FRX2

fd2

FTX

D

Phase shift = 2DFTXsin()/c

Measurement principle IIPhase Shift

Page 24: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

24

1

2

3

1-2: Vertical angle

1-3: Horizontal angle

Measurement principle IIPhase Shift

Page 25: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

25

Spin Measurement principle

w*r

w*r

VradRadar

Strong reflection

Weaker reflection

Weaker reflection

rw

Vtot = Vrad - w*r

Vtot = Vrad + w*r

Vtot = Vrad

Conclusion:A Doppler radar does not only see one velocity, but avelocity spectrum.

The velocity spectrum turns out to have discretefrequency components spaced with the spin frequency w.

Doppler frequency modulated by rotation frequency sidebands

Page 26: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

26

• Doppler radar measures radial velocity– VR R(t) = distance of ball from radar

– …provided initial R is known

• 3-detector array to measure phase– two angles (t), (t) location on sphere

• R(t), (t), (t) gives full 3D trajectory• Spin modulates to give sidebands

– spin frequency

Summary of Technique

Page 27: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

27

Additional Details

• Need location and orientation of TM device (just like PFX)

• Need R(0)

Page 28: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

28

TrackMan Capabilities I

• Full pitched ball trajectory– Everything PITCHf/x gives plus….

• Actual release point perceived velocity• Total spin (including “gyro” component)• Many more points on the trajectory

But given smooth trajectory, additional points are not necessarily useful

Page 29: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

29

Comment about Spin

• Tracking (either TM or PFX) only determines component of spin in the x-z plane– No deflection due to y (gyro) component

• Many pitches have a gyro component– Especially slider

• Combining TrackMan total spin with the indirect determination of x-z component gives 3D spin axis– …a potentially useful analysis tool

Page 30: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

30

TrackMan Capabilities II

• Full batted ball trajectory, including…

• Batted ball speed, launch & spray angles– Equivalent to HITf/x– Landing point coordinates at ground level and

hang time• Equivalent to Hittracker

– Initial spin– and more, if you want it

Page 31: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

31

TrackMan Data Quality I

• Comparisons with Pitchf/x– Pitch-by-pitch comparisons from May 2010 in

StL and Bos look excellent– Comparable in precision and accuracy to PFX– Our Red Sox friends could tell us more, if we

ask them really nicely!

Page 32: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

32

TrackMan Data Quality II

• My Safeco Field experiment, October 2008– Project fly balls with pitching machine– Track with TrackMan– Measure initial velocity and spin with high-

speed video camera– Measure landing point with a very long tape

measure (200-300 ft)

Page 33: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

33

Landing: TrackMan vs. Actual

200

220

240

260

280

300

320

340

200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340

actual distance (ft)

Tra

ckM

an

dis

tan

ce (

ft)

Landing Point Comparison

TrackMan high by about 2.5 ft.: Could be R0 issue

Page 34: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

34

spin: TrackMan vs. video

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

video spin (rpm)

Tra

ckM

an s

pin

(rpm

)Spin Comparison

Page 35: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

35

Summary of Safeco Results

• Initial velocity vector excellent

• Initial spin mostly excellent– But sometimes off by an integer factor (?)

• Landing point correlates well– But systematic difference ~2.5 ft

Page 36: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

36

One final point about batted balls

• We need a convenient way to tabulate batted ball trajectories

• Current TM scheme:– Initial velocity vector– Landing point and hang time, both

extrapolated to field level

• Constant jerk (12P) might work

Page 37: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

37

Some Examples of Analysis

• Pitched ball analysis– Dan Brooks will do much more

• Batted ball analysis

Page 38: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

39

"Every time that I come here to San Diego, it's always good. Everything moves different. The breaking ball is really nasty, and my fastball moves a lot. So I love it here."

Ex 2 Ubaldo Jimenez Pitching at High Altitude

Denver

vf/v0

DenverDenverDenver

Page 39: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

40

Ex 2 Ubaldo Jimenez Pitching at High Altitude

Denver

vf/v0

DenverDenverDenver

San Diego

San Diego

Denver

Denver

vf/v0

Page 40: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

41

Ex 3: Effect of batted ball speed and launch angle on fly balls: TrackMan from StL, 2009

R vs. v0 R vs. 0

USEFUL BENCHMARK400 ft @ 103 mph

~5 ft per mph

peaks @ 25o-35o

Page 41: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

42

Ex 4: What Constitutes a Well-Hit Ball? Hitf/x from April 2009

w/o home runs

HR

BABIP V0>90 Basis for outcome-independent batting metrics

Page 42: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

43

Combining HITf/x with Hittracker

• HITf/x (v0,,)

• Hittracker (xf,yf,zf,T)

• Together full trajectory– HFX+HTT determine unique Cd, b, s

– Full trajectory numerically computed

• T b

• horizontal distance and T Cd

• sideways deflection s

Page 43: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

44

How well does this work?Test experimentally (Safeco expt)

010203040506070

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350distance (ft)

My Safeco Experiment w/TrackMan

It works amazingly well!

Page 44: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

45

Some examples of HFX+HTT Analysis

• Windy Yankee Stadium?

• Quantifying the Coors Field effect

• Home runs and batted ball speed

Page 45: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

46

HITf/x + hittracker Analysis: The “carry” of a fly ball

• Motivation: does the ball carry especially well in the new Yankee Stadium? • “carry” ≡ (actual distance)/(vacuum distance)

for same initial conditions

(379,20,5.2)

Page 46: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

47

HITf/x + Hittracker Analysis:4354 HR from 2009

Denver

Cleveland Yankee Stadium

Page 47: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

48

Average Relative Air Density

Denver

Phoenix

SF

Page 48: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

49

The Coors Effect

~26 ft

Page 49: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

50

Phoenix vs. SF

Phoenix +5.5 ft

SF -5.5 ft

Page 50: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

51

Home Runs and BBS

• 4% reduction in BBS– 20 ft reduction in fly ball distance (~5%)– 50% reduction in home runs– NOTE: typical of NCAA reduction with new bats

Page 51: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

52

Now that you (think you) understand everything…

Slo-mo video here

Page 52: 1 Modern Technologies for Tracking the Baseball Alan Nathan University of Illinois and Complete Game Consulting

53

My Final Slide

• Lots of new information from tracking data

• We have only just begun to harvest it

• These new data will keep us all very busy!