Upload
ansley-ewart
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
3
Methamphetamine Methamphetamine (Meth) Was Once Located In Rural Towns And On The
West Coast, Has Erupted Across The United States And Is Now
Devastating Countless Families, Children And Neighborhoods.
4
What is Methamphetamine Methamphetamine (Meth) Is A Powerfully Addictive Stimulant That Has A High Potential For Abuse And Dramatically Affects The Central Nervous
System.
5
Is Meth Addictive?
Meth Is Addictive, And Users Can Develop A Tolerance Quickly,
Needing Larger Amounts To Get High.
6
Did You KnowIn Some Cases, Users Forego Food And Sleep And Take
More Meth Every Few Hours For Days, 'Binging' Until They Run Out Of The Drug Or Become Too Disorganized To
Continue.
7
Did You KnowImmediately After Smoking Or Injection, The User Experiences An Intense Sensation, Called A “ Rush” Or "Flash," That Lasts Only A
Few Minutes And Is Described As Extremely Pleasurable.
8
Did You KnowOther Possible Immediate Effects Include Increased Wakefulness And Insomnia, Decreased Appetite, Irritability/Aggression, Anxiety,
Nervousness, Convulsions And Heart Attack.
9
Did You Know"More Than 12 Million Americans Have Tried
Methamphetamine, And 1.5 Million Are Regular Users."- David J. Jefferson, "America's Most Dangerous Drug" Newsweek August 8, 2005
“Meth Addicts Are Pouring Into Prisons And Recovery Centers At An Ever-increasing Rate, And A New Generation Of 'Meth Babies' Is Choking The Foster-care System In Many States."- David J. Jefferson, "America's Most Dangerous Drug" Newsweek August 8, 2005
Rock Meth
12
Meth Initiation, 1965 to 2003(National Data from TEDS )
Number of First Time Users, in Thousands
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2001199119801971
New users who fuel our current meth epidemic.
13
Meth Prevalence, 2000 to 2004
Number of Past Month Users, in Thousands
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
1993
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
1994
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
1995
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
1996
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
1997
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
1998
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
1999
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
2000
KEY YEAR: 1992Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
KEY YEAR: 1992
2001
Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
24 or more
< 3
3 - 9Incomplete data
10 - 23
Primary methamphetamine/amphetamine admission rates by State: TEDS 1992-2002(per 100,000 population aged 12 and over)
KEY YEAR: 1992
2002
Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Did You Know
"Untold Families Who Bought Homes In Recent Years Live In Former Meth Labs.” Some, Upon Discovering Their Homes Were Filled With
Residue From Acetone, Red Phosphorus And Other Toxic Agents, Have Fled, Losing Their Investment And A Life's Worth Of Treasured Possessions."- Richard Jerome "Home Toxic Home?" People August 8, 2005
Meth is a triple-whammy:
• Law Enforcement Costs
• Treatment and Societal/Family Costs
• Meth Lab Clean-up Costs
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
KEY YEAR: 1995
Total Lab Seizures in 1995 = 912
Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
KEY YEAR: 1995
Total Lab Seizures in 1996 = 2,509
Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
Total Lab Seizures in 1997 = 2,813
KEY YEAR: 1995
DC
Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
Total Lab Seizures in 1998 = 3,811
KEY YEAR: 1995Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
Total Lab Seizures in 1999 = 6,781
KEY YEAR: 1995Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
Total Lab Seizures in 2000 = 6,992
KEY YEAR: 1995Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
Total Lab Seizures in 2001 = 8,546
KEY YEAR: 1995Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
Total Lab Seizures in 2002 = 9,180
KEY YEAR: 1995Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
100 or more
1 < 50
50 - 99
None
Methamphetamine Lab Seizures by State: DEA, Federal Seizures Only, 1995-2003(Number of Seizures)
Total Lab Seizures in 2003 = 8,502
KEY YEAR: 1995Data Source: El Paso Intelligence Center, National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System
Charts prepared by Carnevale Associates, LLC
34
Good News! - 67% Reduction in Labs(Salt Lake County Metro Data)
59
105
262 272
226
169
132
96 90
37
0
5 0
10 0
15 0
2 0 0
2 5 0
3 0 0
FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05
DEA METRO NARCOTICS TASK FORCEFiscal Year Clandestine Laboratory Seizures
( FY 0 5 Dat a R an ge: 10 / 0 1/ 0 4 - 0 4 / 19 / 0 5 )
Bad News! – Meth is now being trafficked in from Mexico as it is cheap and easy to produce.
35
Who is Using Meth and Why?
• Remember that drug abuse is a complex issue that is highly impacted by a person’s environment and genetic make-up.
• For those that use drugs it is all about the “market”:– Cost of the drug on the street– Availability of the drug– Risk in the use of the drug
36
Gender of People in Substance Abuse Treatment
61.6%
82.1%
38.4%
17.8%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Perc
en
t o
f P
eo
ple
Serv
ed
.
Male Female
Gender Trends
37
METH Use Among Women is Higher Than with Men
(Utah Data)
Number of Admissions by GenderFY2002
13526
1830 1845
6520
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
Male Female
Nu
mb
er o
f A
dm
issi
on
s
Total Admissions Meth Admissions
38
Patient Admissions for Alcohol vs. Drug DependenceFY1991 to FY2005
16.6%
68.4%
83.4%
31.6%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Per
cent
of T
otal
Adm
issi
ons
.
All Drugs Alcohol
Alcohol vs. Drugs
39
Top Four Illicit Drugs of Choice by Year (Excluding Alcohol)FY1991 to FY2005
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Perc
ent of Tota
l Adm
issio
ns
.
Methamphetamine
Marijuana
Heroin
Cocaine/Crack
40
Women, Children and Methamphetamine
• Methamphetamine (METH) continues to be the drug of choice among SLCo’s women of childbearing age who use and abuse illegal drugs.
• Reasons for the preference for METH among this population are many and complex, and include:
– difficulties in juggling family and personal responsibilities– women who use METH are typically depressed, dependent on a male for financial
support, lacking in marketable vocational skills, and overwhelmed with child care responsibilities.
• Of particular concern is the fact that two-thirds (68%) of these women* have young, dependent children. METH appears to be appealing to young women in the short term for several reasons:
– It is cheap and easy to get;– Individuals report that the effects of the drug are extremely appealing– It gives them the energy they need to take care of their children;– It gives them the energy to maintain a home;– It gives them the energy to keep working; and– It helps women lose weight (often referred to as the “Jenny Crank” drug).
*Most of these women must rely, in part, on a male relative or other man to help them subsidize the care of their children. One of the consequences of this reliance is that they must “party” with this man. Because METH is one of the most addictive drugs, once women (or anyone) begin to use METH, they can quickly become physically and psychologically dependent and may not be able to control their use and abuse of the drug. AP&P reports that 90% of women supervised for drug violations began using drugs given to them by their male partners.
41
Drug/Gender
Male Female TotalAlcohol 36.8% 22.2% 31.2%Marijuana/Hashish 18.4% 12.5% 16.1%Heroin 11.5% 8.6% 10.4%Other Opiates/Synthetics 3.4% 6.4% 4.5%Club Drugs 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%Other Hallucinogens 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%Cocaine/Crack 6.0% 7.2% 6.4%Methamphetamine 21.0% 38.3% 27.6%Other Stimulants 0.3% 0.6% 0.4%Benzodiazepines 0.3% 1.2% 0.6%Other Sedative-Hypnotics 0.0% 0.4% 0.2%Inhalants 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%Over-the-Counter 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%Other 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%None/Missing 1.8% 2.3% 2.0%
Total: 11,742 7,243 18,985
FY2005Primary Substance by Gender
42
Under 18 18 to 25 26 to 35 36 to 45 46 to 65 66 and over Missing TotalAlcohol 472 1,213 1,326 1,568 1,298 38 10 5,925Marijuana/Hashish 1,343 904 495 229 89 0 4 3,064Heroin 18 558 556 470 364 2 0 1,968Other Opiates/Synthetics 18 250 295 183 108 1 0 855Club Drugs 6 13 5 1 1 0 0 26Other Hallucinogens 7 17 12 5 2 0 0 43Cocaine/Crack 44 231 339 436 172 0 1 1,223Methamphetamine 187 1,624 1,998 1,126 291 0 9 5,235Other Stimulants 1 18 24 19 14 0 0 76Benzodiazepines 2 27 29 40 18 0 0 116Other Sedative-Hypnotics 1 3 11 9 6 0 0 30Inhalants 11 5 3 0 0 0 0 19Over-the-Counter 3 7 1 0 1 0 0 12Other 2 5 5 4 3 0 0 19None/Missing 240 26 23 18 9 0 58 374
Primary Substance of Abuse by Age GroupingFY2005
Drug/Age
43
Dependent Children
Percent of all Patients with
Children
Average Number of Children (of Patients with
Children)
Percent of Women with
Children
Average Number of Children
(of Women with Children)
Bear River 29.5% 2.15 38.3% 2.09Central Utah 48.2% 2.05 55.7% 2.12Davis County 54.4% 2.06 65.8% 2.05Four Corners 47.0% 2.29 59.8% 2.34Northeastern 81.1% 1.98 86.2% 1.90Salt Lake County 36.7% 2.15 54.3% 2.20San Juan County 9.3% 1.75 23.1% 2.00Southwest Center 57.6% 2.78 71.2% 2.88Summit County 23.7% 2.31 25.5% 1.85Tooele County 43.7% 2.17 61.3% 2.35U of U Clinic 60.6% 2.34 65.9% 2.42Utah County 47.6% 2.41 64.6% 2.40Utah State Prison 35.8% 2.23 49.5% 2.24Wasatch County 56.3% 2.65 62.8% 2.78Weber Human Services 45.3% 2.10 58.8% 2.22
Total: 41.0% 2.21 56.9% 2.25
Patients with Dependent ChildrenFiscal Year 2005
44
METH Use Peaks in Child-bearing Years
Top Four Illicit Drugs of Choice by Age GroupsFiscal Year 2002
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
Under18
18 to24
25 to34
35 to44
45 to64
Nu
mb
er o
f A
dm
issi
on
s
Cocaine/Crack
Marijuana/Hashish
Heroin
Methamphetamine
45
What is the Meth Epidemic Costing Us?
• Remember – we pay one way or another for Meth– Law Enforcement– Prisons/Jail– Courts – Child Welfare– Hospital/ER – Safe and Healthy Communities
46
National Average Societal Issues with National Average Societal Issues with Substance Abuse Contributing Factor Substance Abuse Contributing Factor
70% of
Teen Suicides
Traffic
50% of
Fatalities
52% of Murders
68% of
Manslaughter
Charges
55% of
Burglaries
51% of Auto Thefts
80% of Child
Abuse
51% of Assaults
45% of Rapes
Alcohol and Drugs are Associated
With
Note: These figures are national, however the Salt Lake County
Sheriff’s Department estimates that 75-85% of all crime in Salt Lake
County is substance-related
47
31%37%
50%53% 55% 59%
66%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
CY 98 CY 99 CY 00 CY 01 CY 02 CY 03 CY04
Percent of Children Placed in Custody with Alcohol/Drug Contributing Factors
48
Cost of Treatment
• It costs SLCo about $26,000 per year to treat a three member family.
• Since the cost to fund each family treatment episode is financed with a variety of other funds, the SLCo/State general fund share is about 25% or $6,500 per family treatment episode.
• This is a favorable figure when compared to all the costs of incarceration– cost of incarceration for a woman is about $30,000 per year– to keep a child in state foster care for one year is about $33,000
(total family cost for incarceration and two foster care placements is about $100,000 per year in state and county general funds)
• The $26,000 for family treatment is our most expensive treatment modality, costs range from $3,500 per slot for single men to the $26,000 for a three member family in family treatment. Therefore, the cost savings to the taxpayer to treat rather than incarcerate a mother of two children is significant.
50
Number of Adults who Need Treatment Compared to the Current Public Treatment Capacity
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Bea
r R
iver
Centra
l Uta
h
Davi
s B
ehav
iora
l Health
Fou
r Cor
ner
s
Northe
aste
rn
Sal
t Lake
Coun
ty
San
Juan
Coun
ty
Sou
thw
est
Cen
ter
Sum
mit
Cou
nty
Too
ele C
oun
ty
Uta
h C
ount
y
Wasa
tch
County
Webe
r H
S
Nu
mb
er o
f A
du
lts
X
Need Capacity
(38,769)
Treatment Gap – Utah is Very Representative of the U.S.
51
“Substance Abuse is a Chronic Relapsing Disease” Nat’l Institute of Drug Abuse
• This is a health care issue!• Insurance plans should cover treatment and intervention as a part of
a health care policy.• Employers should make sure that treatment and intervention are
included in their health care plans.• The treatment capacity is at about 25% of the need – provide
incentives to the private treatment system and they will respond by building more capacity.
• Provide more public treatment funding for the individuals who do not have insurance (employer-based, Medicaid, etc.)
• Develop more and better prevention and intervention programs designed to inform the public – “de-stigmatize” addiction.
53
Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant(SAPT Block Grant)
Foundation of Substance Abuse Treatment in the U.S.
2002 United States Public Expenditures for SA Treatment
$1,633,665,433
$328,225,472
$1,665,277,159
$174,013,017
$46,892,629
$49,079,776
SAPT BG (Fed)
Medicaid
State
Other Fed.
Local (county/city)
Other Funds
* Medicaid is one of the major funding sources for women's’ substance abuse treatment in the U.S.
*
54
What You Can Do!!!• Talk with your elected officials (federal, state, county and city).• Tell them we need a coordinated strategy that includes these five
elements:– Harden our borders to keep international traffickers out.– Ask your federal representatives (Congress) to enter into
discussions with international producer countries of Meth precursor drugs.
– Help advocate for more treatment slots for Meth addicts.– Talk with your federal and local officials about standards for Meth
lab cleanup.– Talk with your federal and state officials about tighter control of
Meth precursor drugs (behind the counter and logs).• Start talking and advocating for treatment to be a part of the
discussion on health care policy.• Work in your communities to develop messages aimed at preventing
substance abuse – especially Meth use.• Let your elected official know that we can’t “punish” our way out of
this problem.