13
1 eGovernment research: the making of a success story E-Learning on the rescue Research Programmes Division ALTEC S.A., Greece

1 eGovernment research: the making of a success story E-Learning on the rescue Research Programmes Division ALTEC S.A., Greece

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

eGovernment research: the making of a success story

E-Learning on the rescue

Research Programmes Division

ALTEC S.A., Greece

2

What is common wisdom (elsewhere?...)

• The Biggest Successes are Often Bred from Failures!• What distinguishes a research project is not its

successes, but the way in which it deals with failures.  • The central issue is about experimentation, innovation,

and taking new risks. • Only projects that can deal with failure and still make

money can exist in this environment.  • What is usual is to face many, many failures and a few

extraordinary successes.

3

Reality check

• we are not facing a lack on enabling technologies but • we are indeed facing a lack on paradigms to successfully

deploy them

• In this context we turned to capacity building, in order to provide the means for public organizations to develop a set of relevant capacities that will help them adopt our solutions

4

Capacity building…

• What is different from e-Learning?– Or: Is it different from e-Learning?

• Let’s look at our (ALTEC’s) experiences…

5

ALTEC’s capacity building portal

• We used moodle– Why? No cost, much experience out there, good

support

• We selected material from all e-Gov projects that ALTEC participated and organised it in sessions in order to facilitate learning processes

• Till this point, everything runs like in a conventional e-Learning project!

6

http://research.altec.gr/cp

7

From e-Learning to Capacity Building: The case of the IST OneStopGov project (1/2)

• What the project is about?

• Introduction of a life-event model and the corresponding IT solution to address e-Government service needs in the enlarged Europe

8

From e-Learning to Capacity Building: The case of the IST OneStopGov project (2/2)

• Situation as is:– A small team from each Public Administration

participates in the project activities– Either high-rank officers or temporary

employed for the needs of the project

• Result: after the project ends, no – or limited - intellectual capital remains at the PA side

9

OneStopGov and e-Gov service Coaching

30 – 40 Standard Operating Procedures

12 – 15 working hours per week

1 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) per week

1st F2F*

(3 days)

2nd F2F

(3 days)

3rd F2F

(3 days)

ca. 8 months coaching and training1 8

Teaching

professionals

Management

and CEOs **

Online Reporting & Coaching on Organisational Development

3 – 6 Standard Operating Procedures

5 – 8 working hours per week

ca. 1 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) per month

1st F2F

(1-2 days)

2nd F2F

(1-2 days)

3rd F2F

(1-2 days)

OneStopGov

readiness

assessment

Start:

Structure for capacity building on OneStopGov service development

10

Experiences…

• It is difficult to impose this process on a voluntary base– Example: in one project, none of the involved PAs exhibited any interest

in communicating the existence of the portal to its employees. The case is typical.

• Capacity building efforts should be tightly coupled with the dissemination and exploitation activities of all consortium members

• Reluctance to access and use the portal from the PA sides can unveil much about the real value they get from the research projects

• We are fully committed in continuing our investments in this direction – it is a one-way for increasing the value of our research within the end users’ communities

11

Pathway to future projects

• Users should be encouraged to organise themselves into Communities

• The Communities should be helped to express their needs

• Technology should be naturally implemented and not part of a head-fake exercise (I have the solution – show me the problem!)

• The importance of helping the users build their own capacities should become a natural part of all e-Gov projects

12

Two ideas for future projects

• Our effort is repository-based (like a repository of best practices for e-Gov etc.)

• One idea is to research the area of networks of best practice for e-Gov

• A second idea is for setting up a laboratory for e-democracy that would help organisations (local or regional or central government) to converge into practices that are optimal for application and use in different contexts

13

Follow-up

• Idea nr 1: Network of e-Gov best practices– Mail_to: Adamantios Koumpis ([email protected]

) and Garyfallos Fragidis ([email protected])

• Idea nr 2: De-Lab (e-Democracy Laboratory)– Mail_to: Apostolos Vontas ([email protected]) and

Francesco Molinari ([email protected])