Upload
jaida-lighter
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
ECE 221Electric Circuit Analysis I
Chapter 12Superposition
Herbert G. Mayer, PSUStatus 2/26/2015
2
Syllabus
Source Goal Remove CCS Remove CVS Currents Superimposed Conclusion Exercise
3
Source
First sample taken from [1], pages 122-124
4
Goal
Linear electrical systems allow superposition: compute separate electrical units for each source, then add them after individual computations
This does not apply when dependent sources are included!
Goal of the stepwise removal is the reduction of complex to simpler problems, followed by the addition of partial results
5
Goal
Linear system means, that all currents in that system are linear functions of voltages
Or vice versa: Voltages are linear functions of currents
But never functions of a different power than 1, meaning different exponent!
Finally, when all separate sources have been considered and computed, the final result can simply be added (superimposed) from all partial results
6
Goal With Circuit C1
Goal in Circuit C1 below is to compute currents i1, i2, i3, and i4
Step1: When first the CCS is removed, we compute 4 sub-currents, i’1, i’2, i’3, and i’4, solely created by the remaining CVS
Removal of a CCS requires the connectors to be left open at former CCS; since the current through the CCS is created by solely that CCS
Step2: The CCS is added again, and the CVS is removed
Removal requires the CVS connectors to be short-circuited; since voltage at its terminals is solely created by that CVS
Then compute 4 sub-currents, i’’1, i’’2, i’’3, and i’’4, solely created by the remaining CCS
In the end, superimpose all i’ and i’’
7
To Remove CCS from C1
A Constant Current Source provides the same, constant current to a circuit
Regardless of the circuit loads With varying loads, a CCS causes a different voltage
drop at that same, constant current Regardless of other constant power sources, each
causing voltage drops or currents or both Removing a CCS means, leaving the 2 CCS
terminals open Then no current flow, yet a voltage drops is possible
at the now open terminals, regardless of other sources and circuit elements
8
To Remove CVS from C1
A Constant Voltage Source provides the same, constant voltage to a circuit
Regardless of the circuit loads With varying loads, a CVS causes a different current
at that same, constant voltage Regardless of other constant power sources, each
causing voltage drops or currents or both Removing a CVS means, short-circuiting the 2 CVS
terminals open Then no voltage drops, yet a current flow is possible
at the now connected terminals, regardless of other sources and circuit elements
9
Original Circuit C1
10
Removed CCS from C1
11
Removed CCS from C1
Once we know the Node Voltage across the 3 Ω resistor, we can easily compute all partial currents i’
We name this voltage along the 3 Ω v1
We compute v1 via 2 methods: first using Ohms’ Law and Voltage Division; secondly using the Node Voltage Method
v1 drops across the 3 Ω resistor, but also across the series of the 2 Ω + 4 Ω resistors
The equivalent resistance Req of 3 Ω parallel to the series of 2 Ω + 4 Ω is: 2 Ω
Try it: 3 // ( 2+4 ) = 3 // 6 = 3*6 / ( 3+6) = 18 / 9 = 2 Ω
12
Removed CCS, v1 Via Voltage Division
Req = 2Ω
v1 = 120 * 2 / ( 2 + 6 )
v1 = 120 * 1/4 = 30 V
13
Removed CCS, v1 Via Node Voltage
v1/3 + (v1-120)/6 + v1/(2+4) = 0 // *6
2*v1+ v1 + v1= 120
4*v1 = 120
v1 =120/4
v1 =30 V
14
Removed CCS, Compute Currents i’i’1 = (120 - v1) / 6
i’1 = 90 / 6
i’1 = 15 A
i’2 = v1 / 3
i’2 = 10 A
i’3 = v1 / 6
i’3 = 5 A
i’4 = i’3
i’4 = 5 A
15
Removed CVS from C1
16
Removed CVS from C1
Now we compute the node voltages in the two nodes 1 and 2 via two methods:
First via Ohm’s Law Then using the Node Voltage Method Both nodes have 3 currents, which later we
compute using the Node Voltage method We name the voltage drop at the 3 Ω
resistor v3 And the voltage drop at the 4 Ω resistor v4
17
Removed CVS from C1, Use Ohm’s
At node 1:
6 || 3 = 2 Ω
At node 2:
2 + 2 = 4 Ω
4 || 4 = 2 Ω
yields:
v4 = -2 * 12 = -24 V
v3 = v4 / 2 = -12 V
18
Removed CVS from C1, Use Node Voltage
At node 1:
v3/3 + (v3-v4)/2 + v3/6= 0
At node 2:
v4/4 + (v4-v3)/2 + 12= 0
v4 * ( 1/4 + 1/2 )= -12 + v3/2
v4 = 2*v3/3 - 16
yields:
v3 = -12 V
v4 = -24 V
19
Partial Currents Superimposed
i”1 = -v3/6 = 12/6 = 2 A
i”2 = v3/3 = -12/3 =-4 A
i”3 = (v3-v4)/2 = 6 A
i”4 = v4/4 = -24/4 =-6 A
i1 = i’1+i”1 =15+2 = 17 A
i2 = i’2+i”2 =10+-4 = 6 A
i3 = i’3+i”3 =5+6 = 11 A
i4 = i’4+i”4 =5-6 = -1 A
20
Conclusion
Superposition allows breaking a complex problem into multiple smaller problems that are simpler each
Applicable only in linear systems Resistive circuits are linear! The same principle also applies to circuits
with capacitances and inductances But not to circuits that contain dependent
power sources, Op Amps, etc.
21
Exercise Use superposition in the circuit below to
compute the currents in the 3 resistors First short-circuit only the 7 V CVS, and
compute currents i1’, i2’, and i4’ There is no i3 Then short-circuit only the 28 V CVS, and
compute currents i1’’, i2’’, and i4’’ Finally superimpose the two reduced circuits
to add up i1, i2, and i4 But consider the opposite current directions
for: i1’ vs. i1’’, and for i4’ vs. i4’’ Not used for i2 !! Those 2 currents add up!
22
Exercise: Original Circuit
23
Exercise: Remove 7 V CVS
24
Exercise: Remove 7 V CVS
With the 7 V CVS removed, the equivalent resistance of the 3 resistors is:
1 Ω || 2 Ω + 4 Ω = 2/3 + 4 = 14 / 3 Ω Hence i4’ = 28 / ( 14 / 3 ) = 6 A Current-division of 6 A in the 1 Ω and 2 Ω
results in i2’ = 2 A, and i1’ = 4 A
25
Exercise: Remove 28 V CVS
26
Exercise: Remove 28 V CVS
With the 28 V CVS removed, the equivalent resistance of the 3 resistors is:
1 Ω + 2 Ω || 4 Ω = 4/3 + 1 = 7 / 3 Ω Hence i1’’ = 7 / ( 3 / 3 ) = 3 A Current-division of 3 A in the 2 Ω and 4 Ω
results in i4’’ = 1 A, and i2’’ = 2 A
27
Exercise: Final Result
i1 = i1’ - i1’’ = 4 A - 3 A
i1 = 1 A
i2 = i2’ + i2’’ = 2 A + 2 A
i2 = 4 A
i4 = i4’ - i4’’ = 6 A - 1 A
i4 = 5 A