Upload
edgar-copeland
View
235
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
111GG/Sales Support/ March 2013
ERJ 190
Sukhoi SSJ100 Embraer ERJ 190
Airbus A319Operational
and Economic Comparison
A319
SSJ100
222
Introduction
This study compares the SUKHOI Regional Jet Aircraft SSJ100-95 with some other aircraft: The EMBRAER ERJ 190 (98-seat standard configuration) its direct competitor; The AIRBUS A319 (134-seat all-economy configuration) not considered a direct
competitor, being different in weight and capacity,
from operational and cost points of view.
This comparison applies to general and details design, weights and performance.
The Cabin layouts considered for comparison are the basic one in all-economy configuration, offering the same comfort:
98 seats at 32” pitch for SSJ100-95 98 seats at 32” pitch for ERJ 190 134 seats at 32” pitch for A319
333
Comparable Configurations
Manufacturer’s source
Basic VersionsE. C. January 2012
US $ mill.
SSJ100/95 98 seats / 32” pitch 35.40
(5-abreast)
ERJ 190 98 seats / 32” pitch 42.80
(4-abreast)
A319 134 seats / 32” pitch80.70
(6-abreast)
Sukhoi(Russia)
Embraer(Brazil)
Airbus(EU)
List Price
444
Aircraft Characteristics
Weights and Power Plant
555
Aircraft Characteristics
Dimensions
666
Cabin configurations
Standard Single Class98 seats at 32” pitch
5-abreast
Standard Single Class98 seats at 32” pitch
5-abreast
A319
Single Class all-economy134 seats at 32” pitch
6-abreast
Single Class all-economy134 seats at 32” pitch
6-abreast
SSJ100
ERJ 190
Standard Single Class98 seats at 32” pitch
4-abreast
Standard Single Class98 seats at 32” pitch
4-abreast
777
Cabin Cross Sections Comparison
Largest cabin in its Market Segment…and comparable with existing Narrow Body Aircraft
SSJ100
ERJ 190
888
Cabin Cross Sections Comparison
Largest cabin in its Market Segment…and comparable with existing Narrow Body Aircraft
SSJ100 A319
999
Operational Assumptions
Operating Techniques: ISA Conditions, still air
Taxi Time Allowances: 14 minutes
Engine start and taxi-out 9 minTaxi-in 5 min
Fuel for taxi-in is taken out of reserves.
Long Range Cruise (LRC) speed at best altitude
Fuel Reserve Allowances:
Fuel to 100 NM alternate at long range cruiseContingency Fuel: 5% of trip fuelHolding Fuel: fuel for 30 minutes holding at 1 500 ft above alternate airport elevation
Passenger plus Baggage Weight: 100 kg (220 lb)
101010
Aircraft Performance
Block Time & Block Fuel
111111
Economic Assumptions
Economic Analysis
121212
Economic Assumptions
Annual Utilisation per aircraft 2 800 Block hours
Depreciation 15 years with 10% of residual value
Insurance 1% of aircraft price per year
Fuel 1 086.5 USD / tonne (IATA source – March 2013)
Maintenance According to aircraft jets experience
Landing Charges 6.40 USD / tonne Basis: MTOW
Air Navigation Charges EUROCONTROL Formula Unit rate: 65.00 EUR
Cockpit Crew Cost 235 USD / Block Hour(1 Crew = Captain + First Officer)
Flight Attendant Cost 40 USD / Block Hour
Number of Cabin Attendants per A/C 2 attendants from 51 to 100 seats3 attendants from 101 to 150 seats
131313
Indirect Operating Costs (IOC) 50% of Cash Operating Costs (COC)
Airfare ticket 200 US $ per pax for 500 NM
(Full Fare – Economy Class)
320 US $ per pax for 1 000 NM
Ticket Commission 8% of ticket fare
Exchange Rate 1 Euro = 1.3034 US $ (E. C. March 2013)
Cash Operating Cost: Fuel + Crew + Maintenance + Landing / Handling / Navigation Charges Direct Operating Cost: Cash Operating cost + Depreciation + Insurance Total Operating Cost: Direct Operating Cost + Indirect Operating Cost
Economic Assumptions
141414
Economic Analysis 500 nm Sector
151515
Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector
161616
Cash Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector
C.O.C. per Seat Comparison
On a cost per seat basis, the SSJ100 has a 5.5% advantage over the ERJ 190 and about 13% disadvantage over the A319, largest in size and weight compared to SSJ100.
171717
Direct Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector
D.O.C. per Seat Comparison
SSJ100: lowest D.O.C. per available seat
181818
Total Operating Cost Comparison: 500 nm Sector
T.O.C. per Seat Comparison
SSJ100: lowest T.O.C. per available seat respect to ERJ 190 and equivalent to A319
191919
Profitability ComparisonBreak-Even Load Factors Comparison
500 NM Sector Distance
SUPERJET100 means profitability.Thanks to its low operating costs, it provides significant cost advantages over its direct competitors.
50 pax46 pax
68 pax
202020
Economic Analysis 1 000 nm Sector
212121
Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector
222222
Cash Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector
C.O.C. per Seat Comparison
On a cost per seat basis, the SSJ100 has a 6.2% advantage over the ERJ 190 and about 7% disadvantage over the A319, largest in size and weight compared to SSJ100.
232323
Direct Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector
D.O.C. per Seat Comparison
SSJ100: lowest D.O.C. per available seat
242424
Total Operating Cost Comparison: 1 000 nm Sector
T.O.C. per Seat Comparison
SSJ100: lowest T.O.C. per available seat
252525
Profitability ComparisonBreak-Even Load Factors Comparison
1 000 NM Sector Distance
SUPERJET100 means profitability.Thanks to its low operating costs, it provides significant cost advantages over its direct competitors.
46 pax
41 pax59 pax