058. Froebel Research Committee William Macintyre at Ditchley

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 058. Froebel Research Committee William Macintyre at Ditchley

    1/4

    Homepage News The Foundations Conferences History Hire ofDitchley Photos Contact Us

    e-Commerce: its effect on business and government

    ANote by the Director (Ditchley 2000/12)

    In association with Andersen Consulting

    1-3 December 2000

    Over the first weekend of December we looked at the effect of e-commerce on business and

    Government and whether and how it might be regulated. We asked whether we were living

    through a real revolution or just another technological development. We concluded that never

    had any technology been diffused so rapidly on a global scale with such profound effects and

    with relatively modest capital costs. It was a real revolution akin to the industrial revolution

    whose ultimate effects we could only guess at.

    In looking at the influence of e-commerce on business we thought that the main winners so far

    had been the high-tech companies which had provided its infrastructure, and the main benefit an

    extraordinary reduction in the cost of electronic data transmission. It was, however, much harder

    to identify the effects of all this at a macro level in the economy. B2B exchanges were expected to

    rise in five years to some 6 tril lion dollars. But, it was pointed out, the cost of the goods involved

    formed a major part of the exchange. Perhaps a stock market was a better analogy where

    enormous volumes of transactions took place with only modest profit for the enablers.

    Nevertheless it was claimed that, between 1994 and 1998, the information and communications

    industries had lowered US and UK inflation by 0.5% a year and would increase sustainable

    growth by 0.5% a year over the next decade.

    In looking at the relative weight of B2B exchanges over B2C, we found that B2Bs lead was

    unsurprising. Business transactions had traditionally been characterised by the need to

    exchange large volumes of data for which the internet and IT systems were ideally suited. Its

    transparency offered competitive advantages to many suppliers and allowed for buyers toaggregate their purchasing power. This was, however, a basic approach. As buyers and

    suppliers, particularly of sophisticated products, became more integrated and interdependent so

    open market bidding would decline. In contrast B2C was a complex area where local cultural

    factors played a greater part, as did confidence and trust in the system two themes which ran

    through the conference.

    Would e-commerce prove a globalising influence? We noted its characteristics of speed, not just

    for businesses but also for Governments whose failure, for example, to cut red-tape could

    materially affect advances in e-business in their countries. The cost was modest and the

    technology was easy to operate, factors which had assisted the spread of e-technology and

    commerce. But we also noted, on the downside, that speed brought with it the possibility of rapid

    global contagion as the Love-Bug had demonstrated. It raised problems of exclusion both

    between developed and developing countries as well as within developed countries and it greatly

    facilitated certain sorts of crime.

    The other key issues were payments, security and language. The latter seemed to pose the

    least difficulty in that English was already well established as the language of most common

    use. And for those who wished, automatic translation would soon be available. Payments and

    security were currently much greater problems. In both these areas the potential gains were so

    great that we felt the market would produce better solutions than Government intervention.

    We looked at the role of Governments and the desirability or otherwise of national strategies. We

    identified education as perhaps the single most important issue in ensuring that society

    generally was able to benefit from the e-revolution and that some sectors of society were not

    excluded (children would in future be e-literate or illiterate). Sweden was quoted as an example

    of a country which had, as a matter of Government policy, decided to make Pcs available widely to

    its citizens of all ages. We attached, however, equal importance to the training of teachers and

    the provision of good soft-ware programmes which would allow the hardware to be used

    effectively. We saw a role for business in helping schools where children were capable of

    learning quickly net skills appeared to be intuitive. At the other end of the spectrum we were

    told that certain cities were already in fierce competition for elite talent, and that Government

    policies on taxation and emigration could determine the outcome.

    Some of us suggested that Governments should regard themselves as businesses. The

    rovision of overnment services on the net could roduce ma or benefits for the ublic in terms

    Conferences

    Future Programme

    Typical Timetable

    Past Programme

    2010 - 2019

    2000 - 2009

    2009

    2008

    2007

    2006

    2005

    2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

    Kosovo

    Fisheries

    Devolution

    Illegal drugs

    Accountability of

    NGOs

    Multicultural

    societies

    Restorative justice

    Ditchley Lecture

    XXXVII

    Defence industrialbase

    The new Luddites?

    EU's CFSDP

    Euro and other

    currencies

    e-Commerce

    1990 - 1999

    1980 - 1989

    1970 - 1979

    1962 - 1969

    Annual Lectures

    http://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/286/eus-cfsdp.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/91/2000.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/88/2003.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/81/2004.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/83/2000---2009.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/360/2010---2019.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/82/past-programme.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/248/annual-lectures.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/87/1962---1969.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/86/1970---1979.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/85/1980---1989.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/84/1990---1999.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/287/euro-and-other-currencies.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/286/eus-cfsdp.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/285/the-new-luddites.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/284/defence-industrial-base.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/289/ditchley-lecture-xxxvii.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/283/restorative-justice.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/282/multicultural-societies.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/281/accountability-of-ngos.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/257/illegal-drugs.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/256/devolution.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/255/fisheries.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/254/kosovo.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/91/2000.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/90/2001.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/89/2002.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/88/2003.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/81/2004.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/78/2005.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/96/2006.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/276/2007.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/323/2008.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/339/2009.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/83/2000---2009.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/360/2010---2019.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/82/past-programme.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/49/typical-timetable.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/48/future-programme.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/41/contact-us.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/40/photos.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/39/hire-of-ditchley.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/37/history.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/38/conferences.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/36/the-foundations.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/news.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/http://www.ditchley.co.uk/
  • 8/8/2019 058. Froebel Research Committee William Macintyre at Ditchley

    2/4

  • 8/8/2019 058. Froebel Research Committee William Macintyre at Ditchley

    3/4

    Andersen Consulting for their help and support for this conference.

    This report reflects the Directors personal impressions of the conference. No participant is in

    any way committed to its content or expression.

    PARTICIPANTS

    Chairman : Ms Mary ATolan

    Managing Partner for Growth and Strategy, Andersen Consulting.

    CANADA

    Dr Charles Freedman

    Deputy Governor, Bank of Canada.

    Mr Martin J Lippert

    Vice-Chairman, Royal Bank of Canada.

    Dr Peter J Nicholson

    Chief Strategy Officer, BCE Inc.

    EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

    Mr Michael Niebel

    Adviser on e-commerce issues, DG INFSO Directorate C, European Commission.

    FRANCE

    M Francis Lorentz

    Director General LaSer, Galeries Lafayette.

    M Christian Menanteau

    Director General and Editor, La Tribune.

    M Jean-Marc Nol

    Managing Director, Trusted Shops GmbH.

    GERMANY

    Dr Karl Wilhelm Pohl

    Founder and partner, Pohl & Merrem Solicitors.

    Mr Patrik Zeigherman

    Member of the Executive Board, net.IPO AG.

    IRISH REPUBLIC

    Ms Vivienne Jupp

    Partner Government Market Unit, Andersen Consulting.Mr Brendan Tuohy

    Secretary General, Department of Public Enterprise.

    UNITED KINGDOM

    Mr Robert Ayling

    Senior International Adviser, Dorsey & Whitney LLP.

    Mr Alastair Ballantyne

    Executive Director, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.

    Mr Ian Blair QPM

    Deputy Commissioner, Metropolitan Police.

    Mr Jonathan Cornthwaite

    Partner and Head of e-commerce law, Wedlake Bell, Solicitors.

    Dr Amelia Fletcher

    Frontier Economics.Mr Mike Gannaway

    Director of Marketing & Communications, Andersen Consulting.

    Dr DeAnne Julius

    Member, Monetary Policy Committee, Bank of England.

    Dr Raymond Knott

    Market Infrastructure Division, Bank of England.

    Mr William Macintyre CB

    Director, Communications & Industries Directorate, Department of Trade and Industry.

    Miss Judith Mayhew

    Special Adviser to the Chairman, Clifford Chance, Limited Liability Partnership.

    Mr Hugh Morris

    Partner Communications & High Tech, Andersen Consulting.

    Mr Rommel Pereira

    Head of Chasedotcom, EAME.

    Dr David H Sambar

    Chairman, British American Capital Inc.

    Mr Peter Settle

    Client Director, Strategic Partnerships, I-Solutions, Electronic Data Systems.

    Mr John Spencer

    Head of E-Business Strategy, HM Customs & Excise.

  • 8/8/2019 058. Froebel Research Committee William Macintyre at Ditchley

    4/4

    Copyright The Ditchley Foundation. All Rights Reserved. Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

    Mr Ian Taylor MBE MP

    Member of Parliament (Conservative), Esher and Walton.

    Mr Chris Yapp

    ICL; Director, Internet Society of England.

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Ambassador David L Aaron

    Senior International Advisor, Dorsey & Whitney LLP.

    Mr Gary Bengier

    Chief Financial Officer, eBay Inc.

    Dr Michael S Greve

    Director, Federation Project, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Ms Candace Johnson

    Founder and President of Board of Directors, Europe Online Networks SA.

    Mr Sarwar AKashmeri

    Co-founder, Publisher and CEO, EbizChronicle.com, Inc.

    Mr George M Newcombe

    Head, Palo Alto, Californian Office, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.

    Mr Paul S Raines

    Vice President Internet Security, New York Federal Reserve Bank.

    Mr Randall Rothenberg

    Editor-in-Chief, Strategy & Business, New York.

    Mr Fred L Smith Jr

    President and Chief Executive Officer, Competitive Enterprise Institute.

    Web Design by Chameleon Studios

    http://www.chameleonstudios.co.uk/http://www.ditchley.co.uk/sitemap.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/73/privacy-policy.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/72/terms-of-use.htmhttp://www.ditchley.co.uk/page/71/accessibility.htm