Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
RegularMeeting#1791UNIFacultySenate
April10,2017(3:30-5:07p.m.)ScholarSpace(LIB301),RodLibrary
SUMMARYMINUTES
1.PressIdentification:Nomembersofthepresswerepresent.
2.CourtesyAnnouncements PresidentNookcommentedonthreeareasandansweredSenator’squestions.Topicsincluded(a)TheUniversitybudget(b)OngoingworktofillthevacancyintheMissouriValleyConference’sleftbyWichitaState,and(c)ChangestotheCommencementceremony.(Seepages3-9) ProvostWohlpartsaidheisimpressedby“thedepth,thethoughtfulness,andthephilosophicalnatureofwhat’sbeingengaged”inthecreationoftheFacultyHandbook. FacultyChairKiddandFacultySenateChairGouldhadnocomments3.MinutesforApproval:March,2017(O’Kane/Fenech)Passed.4.ConsiderationofCalendarItemsforDocketing1327 MotiontodocketatheadoforderandmovetoExecutiveSessionforthe purposeofdiscussionofRegentsAwardforFacultyExcellence (McNeal/Walter) https://senate.uni.edu/current-year/current-and-pending-business/regents-award-faculty-excellence-1
1328ConsultativeSessionwithMartyMark,ChiefInformationOfficer,regarding emailaccountcreationanddeactivationparameters(Tobedocketedfor April24,2017Senatemeeting)(Pike/Zeitz)https://senate.uni.edu/current- year/current-and-pending-business/consultative-session-marty-mark-chief-information-0
1329 EmeritusRequestforAlanSchmitz,Music(Campbell/Cooley) https://senate.uni.edu/current-year/current-and-pending-business/emeritus-request-alan-schmitz-music
5.ConsiderationofDocketedItems
2
1327/1217?MotiontodocketatheadoforderandmovetoExecutiveSessionfor thepurposeofdiscussionofRegentsAwardforFacultyExcellence (McNeal/Walter)Motionpassed.https://senate.uni.edu/current-year/current-and-pending-business/regents-award-faculty-excellence-11320/1211EmeritusRequestforMaryElizabethBoes,SocialWork,andFred Abraham,Economics(Hakes/Burnight)Motionpassed. https://uni.edu/senate/current-year/current-and-pending-business/emeritus-request-mary- elizabeth-boes-social-work-and-fred
1322/1212EmeritusRequestforHansIsakson,Economics;andPatriciaGross, FamilyServices.(Hakes/Walter)Motionpassed. https://senate.uni.edu/current-year/current-and-pending-business/emeritus-request-hans- isakson-economics-and-patricia-gross
1312/1213ProposaltorevisePolicy6.10,newlytitledAcademicFreedom, SharedGovernanceandAcademicResponsibility(previouslyreferred totheEPC)(Pike/Walter)MotiontomoveintothePolicyReview Process.MotionPassed.https://senate.uni.edu/current-year/current-and-pending- business/proposal-revise-policy-610-newly-titled-academic-freedom
1324/1214UniversityLevelStudentLearningOutcomesforConsideration (Zeitz/Burnight)MotionPassed.https://senate.uni.edu/current-year/current- and-pending-business/university-level-student-learning-outcomes-consideration
1325/1215Proposal:Eliminationoftheadditionalthirty-twocredithour requirementforUNIstudentsseekingaconcurrentundergraduate doubledegree(twodifferentdegrees,suchasaB.S.andaB.A.ora B.A.andaB.Music)(Walter/Pike)MotionPassed. https://senate.uni.edu/current-year/current-and-pending-business/proposal-elimination- additional-thirty-two-credit-hour
**Motiontoextendsessionby5minutes(Pike/Swan)**Motiontoextendsessionby10minutes(Burnight/Walter)6.Adjournment:(Burnight)5:12p.m.
NEXTMEETING:
Monday,3:30p.m.April24,2017:RodLibrary,ScholarSpace(LIB301)
Fulltranscriptof48pageswith0addendumfollows
3
FULLTRANSCRIPToftheUNIFacultySenateMeeting#1791April10,2017(3:30–5:12p.m.)
AllPresent:SenatorAnnBradfield,JohnBurnight,RussCampbell,Seong-inChoi,LouFenech,ChairGretchenGould,DavidHakes,TomHesse,BillKoch,RamonaMcNeal,SteveO’Kane,AmyPetersen,JoelPike,JeremySchraffenberger,NicoleSkaar,GloriaStafford,LeighZeitz,SenateSecretaryJesseSwan,Vice-ChairMichaelWalter.Also:PresidentNook,AssociateProvostsNancyCobbandKavitaDhanwada,ProvostJimWohlpart,FacultyChairTimKidd.NotPresent:NISGRepresentativeTristanBernhard.Guests:JeffFunderburk,ScottPeters,PaulShand,IraSimet,DianeWallace,ColinWeeks.Gould:GoodafternoononthisveryhotMondayintheScholarSpace.Iwantto
makeacallforpressidentification.Isanybodyherefromthepress?Seeingno
press,IwillmoveontocommentsfromPresidentNook.
Nook:Thankyou.Gretchen(Gould)andItalkedalittlebit,andItalkedwithTim
(Kidd)aswell,aboutthepossibilityofmeattendingasregularlyasIcan,justto
makeafewcomment,butnotnecessarilytotakeuptimeonyourmeetings,but
moreimportantly,togiveyouanopportunitytoaskmequestionsifyou’vegot
them,andpickanitemortwotohelpyouunderstandwherethingsaregoingin
theUniversityandthenbeabletoansweryourquestions.IknowJim(Wohlpart)
doesagreatjobatthat,butsometimesthere’sthingsinareasoutsideof
AcademicAffairs,andit’salwaysnicetoknowthatyou’vegotaccesstothe
Presidenttoatleastaskhimquestionsifthingsaregoinginawaythatyoudon’t
understand.
4
SoIwanttotalkaboutreallyjustacoupleofthingstoday.Weareinthemiddleof
puttingtogetherbudgetsfor2018,butwedon’tknowtargetsyetfromtheState.
WhatwehaveistheGovernor’sbudget,andweknowthatitisnotgoingtobe
whatcomesouttheotherend.WhatweknowintheGovernor’sbudgetisthat
the$2.5millionthatwehadtogivethembackthisyearisgonefornextyear—is
what’sisinhisbudget,plusanotherhalfmillion--$577,000.Sowe’dbelookingat
athreemillion-dollaradjustmentthere.Actually,you’vegottokeepthatin
perspectiveofa$175,000,000budget,soit’sacoupleofpercent.Thelegislature,
theHouseinparticular,takesthatandtheGovernorhastosendthemone,and
theyroutinelyignoreit,andputtheirowntogether.Rightnow,what’scomingout
isthey’resaying,“Hedidn’tmakebigenoughcutstotheentireState,”andthere’s
another$20milliontheywanttoputintoplay,ascomingoutofthepossible
expenses.Buttheyhavenotmadeanycommentsyetaboutwhereit’sgoingto
comefrom.There’salotmorenoiseaboutK-12,aboutprivateHigherEd,the
IowaTuitionGrants;otherprogramsanddepartmentsandthings.Sorightnow,
wedon’tknow.We’rehopingthosetargetsforeachoftheRegentialinstitutions
comeoutinthenextcoupleofdays;certainlybytheendofthisweek,sothatwe
canstarttoworkonreallyputtingourbudgetstogether.There’ssomeexpenses
toothatwereallyneedtokindofwatch:thingsaroundhealthcarecosts;those
sortsofthings,thatallofthoseincreasesinessence,ifwecouldkeepthoseall
around,we’vegottopaythem.Thoseendupbeingcutstoourbudgetaswell.
We’vegottofindthemoneytopaythoseaswell.Soallofthosecouldimpact
this.It’salittletooearlytoputanumberonthisthing.Ican’tbelievewe’regoing
tobeabletomoveforwardwiththebudgetthatwethoughtwewouldbemoving
5
forwardwith.Wewillhavesomecutstoit.Whatwedon’tknowishowbigitisat
thispoint.Idon’tevenwanttospeculateonwhatitmightbe,becausewejust
don’tknowenoughatthispoint.TheVicePresidentshavebeenworkingwith
peopleonsortofbringingsomescenariostogether,andstartinginonthat
process,sothatwhenwegetanumberwecanmovealittlebitmorerapidly.
LetmechangethesubjecttoAthletics.EverybodyshouldhaveheardthatWichita
Statehasmovedoutofourconference.Thattakesusdowntonineteams.The
MissouriValleyConferenceisreallyputtogetheraroundmen’sbasketball
becauseoftherevenuethatgeneratesforus.Wegetabout$1,000,000fromthe
MissouriValley,viatheNCAAandothersforourparticipationintheconference.
Wegetthatmoneybecausetheconferenceputsmen’sbasketballteamsintothe
NCAAtournament.That’sadriver,right?Themoregameswewin--meaningany
memberoftheconference,thebetteroffweare.Right?Sowhatwehavestarted
todo,asthepresidentsoftheMissouriValley,istostarttolookatwhatour
optionsaretoinviteotherstojointheMissouriValleyConference.We’renotfar
enoughalongthereyettosaytoomuch,andyouwanttosortofkeepitquiet.
Right?Thisislikewhenyou’reintheeighthgrade,andyou’regoingtoask
somebodyoutforadate.Youdon’ttellanybodyuntilyoufindoutiftheysay‘yes’
ornot.[Laughter]It’shardenough.Sowe’rekindofinthatwe’veidentifiedsome
people.We’llbetalkingwiththem,andwehopetohaveanewpartnerbythe
endofthesummer;probablyalotearlierthanthat.Therearealotofdetailsthat
needtobeworkedoutwiththatotherschool,andalotofthingsthatneedtobe
thoughtthroughasweselectwhowegooutandtalkto.Soagain,we’llkeepyou
postedbutwereallydon’tatthistimehaveanythingmorethanwearevery
6
seriousaboutthis.It’sabigdealbecauseoftherevenuesthataregeneratedand
comebacktotheUniversity.OurAthleticsProgramofcourseisnotrevenue-
positive,butbeinginthisconferencewithasmanyteams—twoteamstypically,
gettingintotheNCAAtournament,andtherevenuesthatthatgenerates,we’rein
alotbettershapethanwewereatmostDivisionIIschoolsandmostDivisionI
Conferencesthataren’tinthatsortofpower.
We’regoingtoprobablymakesomesmallchangestoCommencement,but
nothingthatwillimpactmostofyou.I’veheardthattherearealargenumberof
peopleonthestage,anditgetskindofcrowded,sowhatIthinkofasthe
‘platformparty.’We’lltrytopullthatbackalittlebittopeoplethatreallyneedto
beupthere.TheothersIstillwanttoattend,andbeseatedandgownedand
robedup,andthosesortsofthings,butmakesurethatwe’renottoocongested
onthestage.Itmakesitalittleeasierforthestudentstogetacrossthestageand
theparentstoseethemandthosesortsofthings.Letmestopthere.I’dbehappy
toansweranyquestionswithinthetimethatyouwanttogive.
Gould:AnyquestionsforPresidentNook?Hakes:Dowealreadyhaveatemporaryhiringfreezefornextyear?What’sour
situationonthat?Arewejustonhold?
Wohlpart:Wedon’t,David(Hakes),soyouallhopefullyknowthis:within
AcademicAffairs,the$2.5milliondollarcutthatwehadtotakethisyear,$1.923
wasinAcademicAffairs,wetookthatcentrally,outoftheAcademicAffairs
Provost’sOffice.WhatI’veaskedthedeanstodoistoworkwiththedepartment
headsandwiththeCollegeSenatestogeneratealistofprioritizedfacultylines
7
forFall‘18.Wehaven’tstoppedthehiresthatarecomingfortheFallof’17,and
we’restillintheprocessofmakingthosehires.Tocreatethatprioritizedlist
whichwewillthenvetattheDean’sCouncil.WewillprobablywaituntilAugust
orSeptemberwhenweknowwhatourenrollmentis,whichisalargepartofour
revenue,tobeabletodecidewhatofthoselineswouldgoforwardforFallof’18.
TheotherthingthathappenshereatUNI,perhapsit’scommonelsewhere--isthat
wefindoutsometimesinAugustthatpeoplearegoingtoretireinthefallorwill
retireattheendofthatyear,sothere’salotofmovementinandout,sowehave
totrackthataswell.Sowehavenotfrozenhiring,we’regoingtobeverystrategic
inwhatwedowithourhiringprocesses.
Nook:Wehaven’tfrozenthemintheotherunitseither.Ibelieveyouneedto
makestrategiccuts,ifyoudoneedtomakecutsininvestments—youneedtodo
thatstrategically,andnotjustbecauseapositionisopen.Right?Oneofmysort
offundamentalwaysoflookingatbudgetingisifyou’reinthatrealmwhereyou
havetomakesomereductions,youdon’thavethemoneytoinvestinthe
Universitythatyou’dliketohaveorusedtohave,thenyoudoeverythingyoucan
tolimittheimpactonstudents.Youhavethemostpositiveoutcome.Youinvest
thebestpossible.Andifyoureallybelievethat,andyoulookattwoprogramsand
oneisgrowing,gettingmorestudentsout,moremajors,hasgrowingSCH
(SemesterCreditHours),hasgrowingpublications--everythingaboutitlooksgreat
andtheyhappentohavearetirement,andinanotherprogram,allthosethings
aremovingintheotherdirection,doyoureallytakethatposition?Isthatwhat
youwanttodobecausethenyou’regoingtohurtmorestudentsthantakingone
8
fromaprogramthat’snot.Thatgetshard.Butthatisn’tjustanacademicthing.
That’sacrosstheboard.
Youlookatwhereyourmoneyisgoingtogetyouthebestreturn--forour
students,inthiscase.AndsoIdon’tliketomakeopportunistic,andIalsodon’t
liketomakeacross-the-board,forexactlythesamereason.Ithinkacross-the-
boardcutsareanadministrator’seasywayout.Youdon’thavetojustifyit.
Everybodytakesthesamething.
Zeitz:Insomecases,whereyoudon’thaveacriticalmassoffacultythough,you
endupwhereyou’reteachingandyou’reworkinganddoingalltheotherservice
worksoyoudon’tgetyourpublicationsdone.Soinsomecases,Ithinkthatneeds
tobeconsidered.
Nook:Italwaysis.Ithastobeaholisticlookatthings.Butifyoudon’thavea
criticalmasstoevenbeteachingtheclassesandapositioncomesopen,then
that’saneed.
Zeitz:Thankyou.Gould:Thankyou,PresidentNook.Nook:Youbet.Thankyou.Cooley:Asyouweretalkingaboutthesestrategicchoices,dotuitionincreases
comeintothestrategyoftheequation?Canyouspeaktothatatall?
Nook:Yes,weknowthatwe’vegota2%tuitionincreasealreadyapproved.I
wouldnotatallbesurprisedthattheRegentsconsiderexpandingthat;makingit
9
evenbigger.It’smyfeeling,we’vegotacurrentRegentpresidentwhoseterm
endsinlessthan30days,whosebeenclearabouttryingtokeeptuitionincreases
steady,andnotsomethingthat’sgoingtoshockstudents,right?Sokeepsmall
steps;butconstantsmallstepsyearafteryearafteryear,insteadofflattening
thingsoutandthenhavetonail‘emforayear,right,assomepeoplewouldsay.
Ithinkthat’sprobablyagoodplan.It’ssafer.Yougofiveyearswithoutatuition
increase,yougetawholebunchofpeoplethatgetitprettyeasy,andthenyou
slamawholebunchofotherstudentswitha10%.I’mnotexpectingthattheywill
comeinandsay“Let’sfillthehole,theentirehole,”becausetheentireholecould
meandoublingthat2%ormore,andI’mnotholdingmybreaththatthisgroupof
Regentswoulddothat.ButIalsodoexpectthattheywillhaveaveryserious...At
theAprilBoardofRegentsmeetingwhichisnextweek,itcouldbediscussed.It
can’tbeapproved.Itactuallytakestwomeetingstoactuallygetatuitionincrease
approved.
Gould:Thankyou,PresidentNook.Nook:Thankyou.Next,commentsfromProvostWohlpart.Wohlpart:IthinkI’mgood.Everything’scovered,unlessthere’sanyquestions,
anythingelsethatyoufolksarethinkingabout.I’vebeenreviewingdraftsofthe
FacultyHandbookpiecesthathavebeencoming,andthey’rejustawesome.I’m
justreally,reallyimpressedandpleasedwiththedepth,thethoughtfulness,the
philosophicalnatureofwhat’sbeingengaged,andIdidn’texpectthatbecauseit’s
suchashorttimeframeandsuchcomplicatedissues.Ithinkeverybodywillbe
extremelyhappy.That’smysense.
10
Gould:Thankyou.CommentsfromFacultyChairKidd?Kidd:No.I’djustliketoechothatwehaveagoodworkingrelationshipwiththe
FacultyHandbook,soIthinkthingsaregoingwell.That’saboutitthough.
Gould:Thankyou.Ihavenocommentssinceeverybodyelsehascovered
practicallyeverything.So,movingon,weneedtoapprovetheminutesfromthe
March27thSenatemeeting.CanIhaveamotiontoapprove?Somovedby
SenatorO’Kane,secondedbySenatorFenech.Allinfavorofapprovingthe
minutesfromtheMarch27thmeeting,pleasesay“aye,”opposed,“nay,”abstain,
“aye.”Motionpasses.MovingontoConsiderationofCalendarItemsfor
Docketing.AsFacultyChairKiddmentionedatthelastmeeting,wewouldtakeup
theRegentsAwardforFacultyExcellenceattoday’smeeting,sincetheawardsare
tobeissuedverysoon.SowewillgointoExecutiveSessionforaveryshorttime
atthebeginning,somayIhaveamotiontodockettheRegent’sAwardforFaculty
ExcellencegoingintoExecutiveSession?SomovedbySenatorMcNeal,seconded
byVice-ChairWalter.AllinfavorofgoingintoExecutiveSessionfortheRegents
AwardforFacultyExcellenceatthebeginningofthedocket,pleasesay,“aye,”all
opposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.NextupwehaveaConsultative
SessionwithMartyMarkforApril24th.Shewantstocomeandtalktothefaculty
abouttheemailaccountandsomeissuesandproblemsthatthey’vehadanda
proposalformovingforward.SocanIhaveamotiontodocketthat?Somovedby
SenatorPike,secondedbySenatorZeitz.Allinfavorofdocketingtheconsultative
sessionwithMartyMark,pleasesay,“aye,”opposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”
Campbell:We’redocketingitforaparticulardate,thatshouldbenoted?
11
Gould:Yes.Yes.ShouldIrephrasethemotion?[No]
Campbell:It’sontheagenda.
Gould:Abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.Andthelastthingtobeconsideredfor
docketingistheEmeritusRequestfromAlanSchmitzintheMusicDepartment.So
movedbySenatorCampbell,secondedbySenatorCooley.Allinfavorof
docketingtheemeritusrequestforAlanSchmitzinMusic,pleasesay,“aye,”
opposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.Okay,nowweareatthe
ConsiderationofDocketedItems,sowewillbegoingintoexecutivesessionfor
ten,maybefifteenminutesorless.
Swan:ImovethatweaccepttheslateofcandidatesfortheRegentsAward
presentedbyFacultyChairKidd.
Gould:SenatorBurnightseconded.Allinfavorofapprovingtheslateof
candidatesfortheRegentsFacultyAwardforExcellence,pleasesay,“aye,”
opposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Themotionpasses.Sonextupwehavean
emeritusrequestforMaryElizabethBoesfromSocialWorkandFredAbraham
fromEconomics.Doesanybodyhaveanycomments?
Hakes:IwillspeakonbehalfofFred[Abraham]briefly—butIshouldspeaklonger
sincehe’sbeenherefor44years.Idon’tknowhowmanypeopleknowFred.
Fred’sheadofthedepartmentandhasbeenfor27years,andhe’sretiringin
August.EverymemberofthedepartmentwashiredbyFredexceptone,andIwas
hisfirstofficialhireafterhebecameactualhead,frombeinginterimhead.So,
he’sactuallyconstructedtheentireEconomicsDepartmentassuch.He’san
excellentteacher.I’mveryfortunatetohavealwayshadadepartmentchairthat
12
wasanexcellentteacher,becauseIcan’timaginehowawkwardthatwouldbeif
yoursupervisingfirstlevelwasaverypoorteacher.He’sbuiltthedepartment
basedonthat.He’sanexcellentteacher.He’shad14,000studentsofhisown,
teachinglargeclassesineconomics,andbuiltthedepartmentfromessentially
veryfewmajorstocruisingat150majorsandequalormoreminors,andIthink
he’sproudestofthefactthatwhenhetookover,weonlyhadoneendowed
scholarship,andnowwehaveten,andtheendowedscholarshipsfromstudents.
Sowehavenurturedsomeveryproductivestudentswho’vegoneoutandhad
excellentcareers,andhavegivenbacktotheUniversityandhavesizable
endowedscholarships--allcreatedfrompaststudents.Itallfitstogetherwithhis
concernforteaching,andthepeoplethathehiredandhimselfkeepingavery
tightrelationshipwithallofourpastgraduates,placingthemwell,oraidingtheir
placementingraduateschoolsandlawschoolandsoon.Andthentakingthem
outtolunchwhenthey’rebackintown,becausethat’saverydangerousthing
whenFredasksyououtforlunch,becauseyouknowit’sgoingtocostyou.That’s
notafreelunch,aswesay.[Laughter]Ithinkthathe’shadaveryhonorable
careerhere,andhehiredme,andI’mpleasedwithhismanagementofthe
department.AndIcertainlyhopethatwegethislineback.
Wohlpart:Ibelieveyou’rehiring.Hakes:Wellweare,butnoonewantstofollowFred(Abraham).Gould:Thankyou,SenatorHakes.Anyothercomments?Campbell:Justatechnicalnote:Isn’thealsoheadofFinanceatthispointintime?Hakes:You’reright,atthistimeheisalsoheadofFinance;foraboutthelastfour
years,soheisadualdepartmenthead.Thetwodepartmentsarestill
13
independent.TheyeachhavetheirownPAC,[ProfessionalAssessment
Committee]andsohegoestodoublemeetingsandhandlesthepromotions,and
inasensetheyhavetheirowndecision-makingbodies,andthenheistheheadof
bothdepartments.Butthat’safairlyrecentphenomenon—thelastfouryears,I
believe.Soinfact,sincehetookonthatrole,histeachingloadhasbeendropped,
whichisashame.Itisalwaysadebate:Doyouwasteyourbestteacherasan
administrator(nooffense)[Laughter]youpullthemoutoftheclassroom,but
we’realsooffendedwhenwehaveaverypoorteachersupervisingotherpeople
whoareexcellentteachers.Soitisalwaysadilemma.There’snoanswertothat
question.Infact,he’sanexcellentteacherwhohascontinuedtoteachlarge
sectionsandbeheavilyinvolveduntilthelastmaybetwoorthreeyears,andwe
misshimintheclassroom.Hecouldteachforever.We’dinvitehimback,butI
don’tthinkthat’sgoingtohappen,butwecertainlywould.Yes,thankyoufor
bringingthatup.
Gould:AnyothercommentsoneitherDr.AbrahamorDr.Boes?Seeingnone,
mayIhaveamotiontograntemeritusstatustoMaryElizabethBoesfromSocial
WorkandFredAbrahamfromEconomics?MovedbySenatorHakes,secondby
SenatorBurnight.Allinfavor,pleasesay,“aye,”opposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”
Motionpasses.Nextupisanothersetofemeritusrequests.ThisisforHans
IsaksonfromEconomicsandPatriciaGrossfromFamilyServices.Doesanybody
wanttosayanythingabouteitherofthesetwoprofessors?
Hakes:Hans(Isakson)isretiringaswellandconnectstotheFinanceand
EconomicsDepartment.ManyofyouknowHans.He’sprobablymostnotedfor
hisserviceonthiscampus.He’sbeenpastChairoftheSenate,andhe’spast
14
presidentofUnitedFaculty.Heactuallywasbroughthereinthefinance
departmentasheadofrealestate.Thereweresomechangesmadeinrealestate.
HisPh.D.isinEconomics.Whenthattookplace,IthinkwemadeatradeforHans
(Isakson)withtwoprofessorstobenamedlaterinafuturedraftchoiceor
something.Itwasactuallyabetterfitinourdepartment,andit’sworkedoutvery
nicely,forbothHansandfortheEconDepartment.Hansisalsoinvolvedinagreat
dealofexternalconsulting,sohe’sverynicetohavearound,andwehopewecan
stillhavecontactwithHansandkeephislinealso.[Laughter]
Gould:Ihopeyoumadenoteofthat.Thankyou.Doesanybodyelsewishtospeak
onbehalfofeitheroftheseemerituscandidates?Seeingnooneelsewishesto
speak,IwillaskforamotiontoapprovetheemeritusstatusforHansIsakson
fromEconomicsandPatriciaGrossfromFamilyServices.MovedbySenator
Hakes:DidyouraiseyourhandMichael(Walter)?
Walter:Yes.
Gould:AndsecondedbyVice-ChairWalter.Allinfavorofgrantingemeritus
statustoHansIsaksonandPatriciaGross,pleasesay,“aye,”opposed,“nay,”
abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.
Walter:Remindmenevertoattendahorseauction.[Laughter]
Gould:Nextup,wehavetheproposaltorevisePolicy6.10,newlytitledAcademic
Freedom,SharedGovernanceandAcademicResponsibility.Thiscamebeforethe
Senatelastfall.WereferredittoEPC,andrequestedtheyconsultwiththe
AdministrationandAnitaGordon.Theyhavedonethat,soScott(Peters)isback
withanupdate.Isthistheversion?Theredlineversion?
Peters:Yes.
15
Gould:Okay.Sowouldyouliketomakeanycomments?Peters:Sure,justbriefly.Thanksforhavingmeback.I’mhereonbehalfofthe
EducationalPoliciesCommission.I’mVice-Chairofthatcommittee.Welookedat
thereferral,madeveryfewchangestoit.WedidconsultwithAdministration,in
fact,suggestedlanguagetostrengthentheguaranteeofacademicfreedom.Ifyou
noticeinthethirdparagraphofthePurposeStatement,thelanguagenowsays,
“TheUniversitythereforemustguaranteeacademicfreedomforitsfaculty.”The
word‘guarantee’wassuggestedbyProvostWohlpart,andsoAdministrationhas
beenverysupportive.WeconsultedwithAnitaGordonandtheCenterfor
AcademicEthics.She,alongwithAdministration,expressedconcernthatthe
responsibilitiessideofthepolicyneedstobeupdated.EPCagreeswiththat.
Giventheimportanceofthetopicandthetenorofthetimes,wefeelthatit’san
importantstatementfortheUniversitytomakerightnowaboutourcommitment
toacademicfreedom,andasVice-ChairoftheEPC,I’mhereonbehalfoftheEPC
tosaythatwewilltakeuptheresponsibilitysideoftheequationnextyear,and
doamoreholisticreviewofnotonlythispolicy,butalsotheacademicethicsand
researchpolicy,andalsothestudentacademicethicspolicy,whichAnita’s
(Gordon’s)Center[theCenterforAcademicEthics]recentlydidasurveythat
indicatedthatthere’squiteabitofmisunderstandingaboutthatpolicyandit
needstoberevisitedaswell.IthinkifanythingsinceIlastcametotalktoyou,
eventssincethattimehavemadeadoptionofthispolicyevenmoreimportant.
TheUniversityneedsastrongstatementofacademicfreedom,andtheroleit
playsininstitutionsofHigherEd.Inourpolicy.Wealwaysneededtomakeit
stronger,Ithink.ButIthinkthat’sevenmoreimportantnow,giventhe
16
restrictions,sotospeakoftheMasterAgreement,andgivensomeofthethings
we’reseeingnationallyintermsofrealchallengestothevaluesofacademic
freedom.
Gould:DoesanybodyhaveanyquestionsforScott(Peters)?Swan:DoesthisrequireustochangeourFacultyConstitution?So,forexample
rightnowIdon’tknowiftenure-lineassistantprofessorsarebarredfrombeing
ChairoftheFacultySenate,forexample,buttermfacultyare.Adjunctfacultyare.
Thispolicysoundslikethatwouldbeinviolationofthispolicy.Itcertainlyseems
tomewouldbeinviolationofthespiritofthismoreacademicfreedomformore
people,thatisinformingthis.SoIwonderaboutyourviewofthat.
Peters:I’mnotsurethatthatrequiresthattohappen,butIthinkitallowsitto
happen.Ifyou’llnoticethelanguageinRomanNumeralTwo,whichsaysthat,
“TheUniversityshallstrivetointegrateallfacultyintothesharedgovernanceof
theUniversity,consistentwiththetermsoftheircontract.”Ithinkthatallowsfor
alevelofprotectionofparticipationinsharedgovernancethatwouldallowthe
Universityfaculty,ifitchoosesto,toexpandvotingrightstothosewhoplayarole
inthatsharedgovernance,whoaren’talreadymembersofthevotingfaculty.So
basicallythatwouldbetherelativelysmallhandfulofadjunctfacultywhohave
someserviceresponsibility,andthesomewhatlargernumberoftermfaculty,I
wouldthink,manyofwhomalreadydothosethings.Butthat’sultimatelyupto
theUniversityfacultytodecide.Itwouldhavetobeafacultyamendmenttothe
FacultyConstitution.
17
Hakes:Soyou’resaying,someonecouldbeChairoftheFacultySenateand
couldn’tsitonaPAC?Isthatcorrect?
Peters:Well,Idon’tknowbecausewedon’tknowbecausewedon’tknowwhat
PACSaregoingtolooklikeunderthenewFacultyHandbook.
Hakes:IwouldthinkthatnoonewouldbesittingonaPACthat’snottenure-
track.
Peters:IactuallysaidnothingaboutwhocouldbeChairoftheUniversityFaculty.
AllIsaidwasthatifthefacultychose,itcouldexpandvotingrights,knowingthat
byexpandingvotingrights--knowingthatindoingso,thosepeoplewhoit’sgiving
votingrightswouldhavesomeprotectionintheirparticipationinfaculty
governance.Rightnow,thoseofuswhoareontenureortenure-tracklinesenjoy
theprotectionoftenure,right?Wehavepeople,includingpeopleatthistable,
whodoservice,butwhodon’tenjoycurrentlyanyreallevelofprotectionfrom
theirengagementinthatserviceunderUniversitypolicy.Thiswouldgivethem
somelevelofprotection.
Hakes:AmImistakenoristhatnotprotectionearnedbyhavingatenure-track
line?Whatyou’resayingisatenure-trackpersonhastogothroughhurdlesand
jumpsandleapsandsupervision,andonandontogainthatindependence,but
someonewho’sjusthiredatamomentandjustinstantlyhasit?
Peters:I’mmakingnoclaimsaboutwhattheFacultyConstitutionwilllooklikeor
whowillbeabletohavevotingrights.Thatisupultimatelytothefacultyto
decide.Personally,Idon’tbelievethatthetenuresystemsetsupaclasssystem
18
thatdeniestoanentirecategoryofpeopletheabilitytoparticipatemeaningfully
inthecommunitythattheychoosetobeapartof,butsomefacultymembersdo
believethat.
Hakes:Don’twerestrictvotingoncertaincommitteesandallsortsofthingsto
tenuredfacultywhenwedothat?
Peters:Again,IwouldsaythatthatisultimatelyuptotheUniversityfacultyto
decide,andwecanhavethatdebate.ThisdoesnotcompeltheUniversityfaculty
tomakethatdecision.
Hakes:Thoseindividualswouldnothavetherighttobeonthatcommitteedueto
this?
Peters:Duetothischangealone?No.IftheUniversityfacultychosetoexpand
thoserights,thischangewouldgivesomelevelofprotection,thatwouldmake
thatparticipationmoresecureandmoremeaningfulforthem.
Pike:I’mjusttryingtoclarifyhere.Sothispolicyisaboutextendingacademic
freedomprotectionstofacultywhoarenotnecessarilycurrentlycoveredbythe
policynow?Itencouragesthesharedgovernance,butitdoesn’treallyaddress
howthatwouldbeimplemented,orhowthatsharedgovernancemeans.Thisis
moreaboutextendedtheprotectionsofacademicfreedom?AmIgettingthat
correct?
Peters:IwouldagreewiththatandIwouldmakeoneslightchangetoit,andthat
isthatatthemoment,andIhaven’tseendraftsofthehandbook,soIhaveno
19
cluewhattheHandbooksays,orwhatitwillsay—butatthemoment,whenthe
MasterAgreementexpires,thereisnothinginUniversitypolicythatindicatesany
levelofprotectionofacademicfreedomatthemoment.Okay?Tome,thatis
fundamentallywrongforaUniversitytohavenostatementsinitspolicyabout
theimportanceandcentralityofacademicfreedomtotheenterpriseinwhich
we’reengaged.SowhatIwouldsaythatslightlychanges,isthatthispolicy
protectseverybody’sacademicfreedom.
Wohlpart:IfIcouldjustclarify,itprotectsallfacultymember’sacademicfreedom
indoingtheirduties,theirresponsibilities?
Peters:Absolutely.Yes.Wohlpart:Let’sjustbeclear,itdoesnotextendittostaff,professionaland
scientificstaff,ormeritstaff.AndIwanttopointoutthatthereisdistinction
betweenacademicfreedomandsharedgovernance.Thisisperhapsopeningthe
doortobroadenthecultureofwho’sincludedinsharedgovernancewhichgoes
David,(Hakes)toyourquestion.Itdoesnotdecidetheanswertothatquestion,
butitopensthedoortothepossibility.Itdoesnotsaythatsomeonewho’snotin
aPAC,nottenured,canallofasuddendoX,Y,&Z,butitdoesopenthedoorfor
youalltohavethoseconversations.AndwhatIappreciateaboutthis,istheidea
thatsuddenlyaclassoffolkswhomaynothavebeenincludedincertainshared
governancepractices,nowcanbe,andit’sreallyuptothefacultytocome
togethertodecidewhatthatmeans.Iwilljustgiveyou—thisisnotanimposition
onthefaculty—IwouldagreewithwhatScott(Peters)said,Idon’tseeanyreason
whyyoushouldnotextendthatcourtesytoallfacultywhoaredoingthecore
20
workofteachingourstudents,indifferentways.Butthat’suptothefacultyto
decide.
Swan:I’mgladyoupointedouttheSectionTwobecauseIthinkthat’sthenubof
whatwe’rediscussinghere.Thisisapolicy,right?Andsoitwillbeincumbent
upontheAdministrationtoexecutethispolicy,anditsoundstomethatFaculty
Constitutionisinviolationofthispolicy.Butyou’resayingthatit’snot.Thatwe
cancontinuewiththecurrentFacultyConstitution,ifthat’swhatwedecide.And
itsoundstomethatwecan’t.AndI’msupportiveofchangingtheFaculty
Constitutiontodothis,butIwantittobeclearherethatthisbody--the
representativesoftheFaculty,areputtingintopolicy--somethingthatmakestheir
Constitutionobsoleteorinviolation,andinneedofupdating,changing,
embracingtheincreasedacademicfreedomformorepeople;thesesortsof
things.SoIdon’tthinkthatit’sgoodforustosaythatitdoesn’tdothat.Wecan
continuetobeatodds,butwewouldbeatodds.Wethefacultyrepresentatives,
saythisisgood,andourConstitutiondoesneedtobechanged,andweshould
addressthatinthefall,itseemstome.
Peters:Iunderstandwhatyou’resaying.I’vehavealwaysbeen—I’lladmitthat
I’vealwaysbeenalittle…Idon’tknowwhattherightwordis—confused,Iguess,
foralackofabetterword,abouttherelationshipbetweentheFaculty
ConstitutionandUniversitypolicies.I’vecertainlyheardfacultymembersexpress
theviewwhichIunderstand,thattheFacultyConstitutionandthebylawsofthe
Senateisfundamentallyaboutwhatthefacultywanttodo.Wecanreorganize
ourselves,andinsenseourorganizationofthefacultydoesn’tdependonthe
Administration,right?It’sindependentofthat.Wegettogetherasafacultyand
21
wemakeourdecisions.ButIdohearwhatyou’resayingaboutasrepresentatives
ofthefacultypassingthis.ThatcouldsuggestthattheFacultyConstitutionneeds
tobechanged.Asyouknow,whatpromptedthiswasinfactarecognitionthat
acrosscampusforsometime,therehadbeenacademicunitsthataren’t
followingtheFacultyConstitution,andthatperiodicallyleadstopeoplewhoare
involvedandengaged,gettingelectedtoUniversitycommitteesandthenwehave
togobackandholdnewelections,becausethey’renoteligibletobeonthe
Universitycommittees.Ourlargestcollegegrantsvotingrightstopeoplewho—
it’sConstitution,itsbylaws,grantsvotingrightstopeoplewhoarenotvoting
membersoftheUniversityfaculty--namelytermfacultymembers.AndsoIthink
thatpersonally,IsupportsomechangetotheFacultyConstitutionthat
guaranteesthatthosewhohaveserviceobligations;thosewhoaresomething
morethanjust…Idon’tknowwhatthelanguagewouldlooklike.Butinmymind,
it’snotnecessarilytheStateSenatorthatwehiretoteachaclassonceevery
otheryear,butfacultymemberswhoaretrulymembersofthecommunity,
shouldhavetheabilitytoparticipatemeaningfullyinthatcommunity.
Swan:TofollowupwiththatScott,(Peters)thepolicies—andthat’swhatthisis
beforeus,aretheresponsibilityoftheAdministrationtoexecuteandmakesure
they’reabidedby.WhereastheFacultyConstitutionistheresponsibilityofthe
facultytomanagethatandguaranteethat.So,withthispolicy,thesedecisions
arebeingputultimatelyinthehandsoftheAdministration?Isthatcorrect?
Peters:Idon’tknowananswertothatquestion,honestly.Doyouseelanguage
thatyouthinkcouldbechangedthatwouldresolvethat?
22
Swan:I‘mnotsurethatthat’snecessarilyabadthing.Therecouldbegood
things.
Campbell:Asapolicy,whenwearepassingthisweareendorsingthis,butit’sthe
Administrationwhichisgoingtoapproveit.Theymaydosomewordsmithing
beforetheyapproveit,andthePresident’scabinetisgoingtohavetoapprove
this.WhereastheFacultyConstitutionIbelieve—thatbelongstothefaculty.Is
thatcorrect?
Peters:Correct.Campbell:ThisisaUniversitypolicy.ItdoesnotgointoeffectuntilthePresident’s
cabinetapprovesit.
Wohlpart:Yes,wecantalkaboutprocess,whichwouldbeimportanttodo.This
wouldgotothePolicyReviewCommittee.ItwillgototheCabinet.ItgoestoEMT
[ExecutiveManagementTeam].Weareprobablysixmonthsofffromthisbeing
approved,atleast.Maybelonger.Everythingisaprocess,andIappreciatethe
factthatit’scomingtoyouallfirstforyourconsideration.Thisnotyourlast
chancetocommentonthis.Youactuallywillgetotherchances,becauseweput
allpoliciesupforUniversityreview.
Hakes:Iamabitconfused.Weopenedthediscussionasifthisisjustabout
spreadingacademicfreedomacrossmoreofourfacultymembers.Butthenthe
discussionsayswhatinitiatedthiswasgettingvotingrightsforpeople.Andyou’re
going,“That’swhatIthought.”Yousee,thosetwo…that’swhatIthought.The
objectiveisundertheguiseofacademicfreedomforeverybody.We’regoing
23
to…itwon’thappenimmediately,butitwillopenupthediscussionforvoting
rightsfortermpeople,whichiswhatitseemstome.
Peters:Iwouldobjecttothecharacterizationofitas“undertheguiseof
academicfreedom.”It’sexpandingtheabilityofpeoplewhodolaborandteach
ourstudents,andparticipateinoursharedgovernancetovoicetheiropinionsis
notaguise.That’savalue.Andit’safundamentalvaluethatIwouldhopewe
wouldallshare.
Hakes:It’swhatinitiated…Peters:Whatinitiatedit…Hakes:Whatinitiatedwasthefactthatwehadpeoplesittingoncommitteesthat
wereeitherviolatingtheConstitution,andwewantedtogetthatfixed.I’mjust
saying…I’mjustrepeatingbacktoyouwhatyousaid.
Peters:Iwouldsaythat’sclosetowhatIjustsaid,whichiswhatinitiateditwasa
recognitionthatourcurrentpoliciesdonotprotectthewaysthatinmanycases
ourfacultycurrentlyparticipateinsharedgovernance.
Pike:Soitdoesseemtomethatthereisaconflictinthepolicythat’sbeing
presentedtous.Inthelastparagraph,afterRomanNumeralOne,Academic
Freedom,thereisasentencethatsays,“Allfaculty,regardlessofrankor
appointment,shallbeentitledtoprotectionoftheiracademicfreedom,”and
then“andshallbeprovidedtheopportunitytofullyparticipateinshared
governance.”ThenRomanNumeralTwosays,talksaboutacommitment,“shall
strivetointegrateallfaculty,”butitdoesn’treallysayhowthatshouldbedone.
24
AndIthinkthat’swheretheissueis.There’ssomeconflict.Inoneplaceit
proscribeshowthatshouldbedone,andthisparagraphjustsays,“Weshould
strivetodothat.”AndthinkingaboutthepotentialconflictwiththeFaculty
Constitution.Doesthatmakesense,thatthere’ssortofaconflictthere?
Peters:Iunderstandwhatyou’resaying.Thatparagraphyoupointto,thefirst
paragraphunder“Policy.”Ican’trememberforsure…Yeah,thatwasnotin
the…thatmaynothavebeeninthedraftthelasttimeIcametoyou.Mynotesare
alittleincompletehere,butIfeellikethatmighthavebeeninsertedasaresultof
ourfirstdiscussionwithyou.
Pike:ItdoeslooklikeitcomesfromtherecommendationoftheAAUPreport.I’m
justpointingoutthere’salittlebitofacontradictionthereintermsofwhether
wewanttotalkaboutstrivingandbeingopen;howwe’regoingtoaccomplish
thatgoalasspecified.
Hesse:Isstriveconsistentwiththetermsofourcontract?Pike:Right,butagainthatotherparagraphsaystheyshouldallbevoting.They
shouldallparticipate.“Shallbeprovidedtheopportunitytofullyparticipatein
sharedgovernance.”
Hesse:Itdoesn’tsayvotingrights.Wohlpart:That’snotvotingrights.Howyoudeterminesharedgovernanceisuptoyou.Pike:Maybethat’swheretheconfusionis.
25
Wohlpart:IfIcouldmakeacomment:OneofthethingsthatIactuallytalked
aboutwhenIinterviewedandinthefirstyearthatIwashere,wasthatwedon’t
reallyhavearobustenoughunderstandingofsharedgovernanceonthiscampus,
inmyopinion.Ithinkwecrossthelinesinallsortsofwayswithshared
governance.Iwouldencourage—Ithinkthisissuchahealthyconversation,butI
don’tthinkyouallaregoingtogettowhereyouneedtobetoday,becauseIthink
whatyou’retalkingaboutisapotentialcultureshift,whichisawesomethat
you’retalkingaboutthat,butthisisnotaplacetoshiftculture.Andapolicy’snot
aplacetoshiftculture.SoIwouldencourageyouallto,andIhatetodothisto
Scott(Peters)becausehe’sworkedreallyhardonthis,istohavemaybeamore
robustconversationoutsideofRobert’sRules,whereyouguyscanreallytalk
aboutwhereyou’reheaded.
Peters:TheproblemwiththatiswehaveamajorCatch22,andthatisthatthe
cultureshiftdiscussionisfundamentallyaboutthekindofthingsthatSenator
HakesandIhavebeentalkingabout.Butthatdiscussionisalmostmootifpeople
whocurrentlyaren’trecognizedundertheFacultyConstitutionasvoting
membershavenoprotectionfortheirparticipationinthefirstplace.Soit
becomesasortofchickenandeggquestion.Somethingjustoccurredtome,andI
don’tknowwhyitneveroccurredtomeinthemonthsthatwe’veworkedonthis
indifferentcommittees,butratherthanthelanguageinRomanNumeralTwo
about,“integratingallfacultyintosharedgovernanceoftheUniversity,consistent
withthetermsoftheircontract,”Iwonderiftherecouldbelanguageinthere
thatsayssomethinglike,“integratingallfacultyrecognizedbytheFaculty
Constitutionasvotingmembers.”Thatwouldgivetheprotectiontoallvoting
26
membersinUniversityPolicy,andthenwouldallowthebroaderdiscussionof
whoshouldbeavotingmembertohappen.Idon’tknowwhatSenatorHesseor
SenatorKochthinksofthatpossibility.Idon’tknow.It’shonestlysomethingthat
justoccurredtome.
Hesse:I’mnotafanofthis.Isupportthepolicy.I’mnotafanofwhatwasjust
proposed.IwasinvolvedinanearlydraftofthisandthenIleftthegroup.Andthe
contextforthisis,wetalkaboutacademicfreedom,academicresponsibilityand
sharedgovernance,butwereallydon’thaveanysetpoliciesorclearexplanations
aboutwhatthesetermsactuallymean.Sowhatwedidiswetriedtograbwhat
wehadfromanyresourcesavailableatUNI,lookatotherschools,lookatAAUP
andcombinethemalltogetherinadocumentwhichwehaverighthere.Thetopic
ofextendingvotingrightsisavery,veryimportanttopic,butthat’saseparate
topicthanthis.Thisisjustapolicystatementonacademicfreedom,academic
responsibility,andsharedgovernance.Inparticular,protectingpeoplewho
choosetoserveoncommitteeswhohaveadjunctorparttimestatus.Roman
NumeralTwothere,SharedGovernance.AndsoI’mconcernedthatthe
discussion’sgettingblurredbetweenthispolicyandextendingvotingrights.I
wouldconsiderthosetobedefinitelyseparateissues.Thevotingrightsextension
willbeprobablydiscussedinthefuture,butthekeythingis—it’sinthefuture.
Peters:Actually,yourcommentjuststruckhomeanotherpointthatwe’vekindof
overlooked,andthat’sthatevenifthefacultyweretokeepthecurrentdefinition
of“votingfaculty,”therestillarecircumstances,asontheSenate,wherenon-
votingfacultyparticipateinsharedgovernance.Therearenon-votingfaculty
membersinvariouscommittees.
27
Hesse:There’satleastonecommitteeononecampuswhereadjunctsarea
majorityofthemembersonthecommittee.Theworldischanged,andsothisis
designednottoextendvotingrights,buttoextendsomeprotectionsforthe
peoplewhochoosetoserveUNI,andofteninvolvegoingbeyondwhattheir
contractstipulates.
Campbell:I’mjustthinkingthatIthinkit’stooproactiveforsomepeople.Again,
underpolicy,“Shallbeentitledtoprotectedacademicfreedom,shallbeprovided
theopportunitytofullyparticipateinsharedgovernance.”Ithinkyouwanted
somethingmorelike,“Whichwillprotectthemwhenparticipatinginshared
governance.”AnddownunderTwo,“Shallstrivetointegrateallfacultyinto
sharedgovernance.”Again,thatisamorepowerfulstatementthanmanypeople
wouldlikeatthispointintime.“Shallprotectfacultywhileservinginshared
governance,”ratherthan“Strivingto”bringthemintosharedgovernance.
Swan:Ithinkthatpartoftheissue,andyouwerehittingonitverynicely,isthat
someofthewords,suchas“fullparticipants.”Whenwereadthat,whatdoesthat
mean?Toalotpeoplethatwouldmean—oh,well--voting.Thatifyoudon’tvote,
you’renotgiventheopportunitytofullyparticipate.Althoughunderourcurrent
systemofsharedgovernanceasconstructedbytheFacultyConstitution,non-
votingfacultymembersdofullyparticipatewhentheyengagetheroleasanon-
votingfacultymember.Ithinkthat’spartofwhatyou’reunderstanding.You’re
understandingthefullnessofthehistoryofUNI,andthegoverningdocuments
andthissortofthing,that’swhyyouthinkofthis,butlotsofotherpeopledon’t
seeanon-votingfacultymemberfullyparticipatingasnon-votingfacultymember,
28
asfullparticipants,becausesomepeopleseevotingasnecessarytothedefinition
offullparticipation.Ithinkthat’serroneous,butotherpeopledon’t,right?And
that’spartofthedifferences,andwhywehavetokeephavingdiscussionslike
this.Whenyou’retalking,itsoundslikeyou’representingthisassaying,and
SenatorHessehassaidthis,thatvotingisaseparateissue.Andthat’swhyIcan
see,votingisaseparateissue,becausenon-votingfacultymemberscurrentlyfully
participateasnon-votingfacultymembers.Ifwewantedtochangethatshared
governancesystemwecould,butwedon’thaveto.Butotherpeopledon’t
understanditthatway.SoIthinkthat’spartoftheissue,ishowpeoplethink
aboutfullparticipation.
Peters:Inlightofthosecomments,Iwouldencouragepeople—Ican’toffer
amendments,I’mnotamemberofthisbody.Youguysare.Youcanmake
decisions,soifyouwanttopasssomethingthataffirmsourcommitmentto
academicfreedomandsharedgovernance,byallmeans,makeamendments,and
lesspasssomething.
Gould:Yes.Yes.Swan:Wouldyoubeopentoreceivingwordingfrompeople,andwewould
handlethisfirstthingatournextmeetingwiththenewwordingthatcomesto
you?
Peters:Iwouldbewillingtodothat,sure.Swan:Sothat’sonepossibility,butwecouldchangethingstoonow,asyou
suggested.
29
Gould:Didyouwanttomakeamotion?Swan:Ican’ttellwhatotherpeoplewant.Gould:Whatwouldyouguysliketodomovingforward?Campbell:Iwouldmovetotable,becauseIthinkthewordsmithingisnotgoingto
getdoneatthismeeting.
Swan:Wait,soshallwe,becauseProfessorPetershasworkedonthisforyears,
andtablingcanbeindefinite.Couldwemakeamotionsaying,“Thiswillbethe
firstthingunderdocketedbusinessatournextmeeting,withthenewwording
that’sbeenproposedthathe’sworkedwithandintegrated?Doesthatsound
okay?Ipreferthattotablingit.
Hesse:Canwegetagreementonnewwordingintwoweeks?Swan:Ihatetomakeitlonger.I’mthinkingofProfessorPetersandhowmany
yearshe’sactuallybeenworkingwiththis,butIdon’tknow.ProfessorPeters,can
wegetthisdoneintwoweeks,doyouthink?Reallyaweek--isn’tit?Becausewe
sendthingsoutaweekaheadforconsideration.
Wohlpart:Ijustalsowanttomakethepointreallyquicklythatyouallarenot
approvingthispolicy.Youdon’thavetheauthoritytoapprovepolicies.That’s
actuallythePresidentandtheEMT.Whatyou’redoingissendingthisforward
intothepolicyprocess,whereyouwillhavelotsofopportunitytohavemore
feedback.Thatwillhappeninthefallsemester.Youallknownowsomeofthe
conceptsthatareinhere,thatperhapsrubupagainstyourConstitution.You
30
shouldlookbackatyourConstitutioninthefall,andseeiftheyfallinline.That
willengendersomeconversationaboutnewlanguagethatyoucouldproposeas
thisgoesthroughthepolicyprocess.Youallarenotapprovingthis.It’snotdone
today.Youdon’thavetheauthoritytodothat.You’resaying,“Thisisgreatwork.
Let’smoveitforwardintothepolicyprocess.”That’sallyou’redoing.
Kidd:Iwouldsay,getitdonerightnow.Idon’twanttowaituntilafterthis
semester,tobehonest.Wedon’twanttogoforwardwithoutthispolicypassed
insomeformifwecanhelpit.Butifyouwanttodiscussacoupleofwords,not
majorchanges,butabitofthewording,Iwon’tmind.
Pike:I’mgoingtoproposeasmallamendment.Isomewhatdisagreewithyou.I
havenoproblemwiththisparagraphasittalksabout“strivingtointegrate.”
That’sagreatthing.That’sagoal.Maybejustacoupleofwordstoclarify
protectiontothoseinthatparagraphaboutfullyparticipate,“theprotectionis
extendedtoallthosewhoareparticipatinginsharedgovernance,”fortheir
participation.Somesmallclarificationthere…
Gould:Whichsectionareyou…?Pike:Theparagraphrightabovethat,“Asfurtherdefinedbelow—Allfaculty,
regardlessoftheirprotectionofacademicfreedomandshallbeprovidedthat
protectionastheyparticipateinsharedgovernance.”Doesthat?It’sasmall
change.Doesthatclarifyatallthatit’sabouttheprotection,andwecandecide
laterabouttheextenttowhichwewanttolookattheFacultyConstitutionabout
participatingandvoting.
31
Funderburk:Listeningtothisontheside,itstrikesmethatyou’rehungup
primarilyontheword‘fully.’Soifyou’retryingtomovethisforward,youcould
justdeletetheword‘fully.’“Shallbeprovidedtheopportunitytoparticipatein
sharedgovernance,”ifyou’retryingtowordsmiththat.
Hakes:Ididn’tknowthiswasadocumentaboutprovidingopportunitiesfor
sharedgovernance.It’ssaying,“Ifyou’reinvolvedinsharedgovernance,you
deservetheprotectionsofacademicfreedom.”Thoseareseparatethings.One
hasbeenstated,veryproactiveastowhatweimaginethefuture,asopposedto
justsaying,“Ifyou’recalledtoserveonacommittee,youshouldbeprotected.”
That’sadifferentthingbetweensayingyouhavefullrightstofullyparticipateand
beon…Idon’tknowwhereyou’regoingwiththat.Andthere’snoreasontoeven
gothereifyou’reobjectivewastoprotectacademicfreedomofpeoplecalled
uponintouchyspotstoserveoncommittees,tobeabletosaywhattheyneedto
say,thenlet’ssaythat.Idon’tthinktakingthatword‘fully’outisevenclose.
Swan:Ithelps.Hakes:We’renotprovidingopportunities,we’resaying,“Ifyou’recalledupon,
youdeserveprotection.Isn’tthatwhatweoriginallythoughtwe’redealingwith?
Unlesswe’retryingtodosomethingelse,too.
Zeitz:Sowhatyou’resayingisthatifsomebodysays,“No,”they’renotgoingto
bereceivinganykindof...
Hakes:Soiftheysay“no”aboutwhat?
32
Zeitz:Soinotherwords,ifthey’recalledtoserve,andtheysay“No,Idon’twant
toserve.”Isthatwhatwe’retalkingaboutwithacademicfreedomhere?
Hakes:I’mtalkingaboutwhenthey’reserving,theycansaywhattheywantto
say.
Zeitz:Isee.Hakes:I’mthinking…Ijustthinkabouthowcarefully...Thereasonthisbothersme
is,Ithinkofhowcarefullywehireassistantprofessors,andhowcarefullywe
placethemintosituationswheretheycouldhaveaproblem.AndthenIknow
howdifferentthatisfromwhenwehireadjuncts,andhow…YouseewhatI’m
saying?Icannothelpbutthinkthatthereisgreaterprotectioninasense,being
providedtosomeoneinstantly,thanthewaywetakecareofsomeonewhosean
assistantprofessorrank.Ifindthistobesooutofbalance,thatallI’msayingis
thatifwe’regoingtohavesomeoneserve,andit’spartoftheircontracttoserve
sometimes,thentheyshouldbegrantedacademicfreedom.ButIdon’tknowthat
weshouldgofurtherandsay,“thatpositionhasrights”toanythingyet.Idon’t
knowwhywe’reevengoingthere.
Pike:I’mgoingtotryandbringthistoaclose.IfIcouldmakeamotionthatwe
approvethispolicyaspresentedwithonechange,thatinsteadof“shallbe
providedtheopportunitytofully,”changethatto“duringparticipationinshared
governance.”Soitsaysitbasicallyjustsaysthey’reentitledtoprotectionoftheir
academicfreedomduringparticipationinsharedgovernance,andshallbe
expectedtofulfilltheiracademicandethicalresponsibilities,”andjustmoveit
forwardfromhere.
33
Peters:MayIsuggestjustoneadditionalword?Pike:Sure.Peters:“entitledtoprotectionoftheiracademicfreedom,protectionduringtheir
participationinsharedgovernance,”tomakesurethatit’sclearthatacademic
freedomisnotonlyaboutsharedgovernance.
Pike:CanImakethatmotion?Gould:Youcanmakethemotion.CanIhaveasecond?SomovedbySenator
Zeitz.Okay,allinfavor…
Swan:Nowwediscusstheamendment.Gould:Okay.Discussionontheamendment.Campbell:IhaveaquestionforSenatorHakes.I’mstilllookingatRomanNumeral
Two:SharedGovernance,andareyoubotheredbythat,“shallstrivetointegrate
allfacultyintothesharedgovernance”?
Hakes:Yes.Idon’tthinkthatthiswaswhatabout.Ithoughtthatthiswasabout
extendingacademicfreedomtothosethatarecalledupontoserve.That’swhatit
wasoriginallyproposed.Peoplearecalledupon,sometimescontractually,tobe
involvedinserviceobligationsthatarecontractuallyrequiredofthem,andthey
don’thaveacademicfreedomprotection.That’sthewayitwassoldtousfrom
DayOne.That’swhatwe’redealingwith.Isee.Ifit’sinyourcontractthatyou
havetoparticipateonthese,thenyes—thatmakessense.Itdidn’thaveanything
todowithadvancingotherissues.Soyeah,Iwouldhaveaproblemwiththat,too.
34
ButIagreewiththefirststep.Again,youcanpassthiswithoutme.I’mjustsaying
howthiswasapproachedatthebeginninghadnothingtodowithmaking
statementsaboutinclusion,anditallhadtodowithinfact--thatwastheexample
given--thatpeoplewhoareadjunctshavecontractsthatrequirethemtoservein
certainwaysthatcanbetouchy.That’sthewayitwasbroughttous,andthat’s
thewayitwasbroughttous.That’sthewayitwas.
Kidd:Justaquestion:IthoughtIcouldchangethewordingjusttoreflectthe
proposedamendment.CouldyoupleaserepeatthatScott(Peters)?
Peters:IthinkSenatorPike’samendmentwas…Pike:“Aprotectionwhileparticipatinginsharedgovernance.”Wasn’tthatit?And
therestofthatwastakenout.
[FacultyChairKiddreworksproposaloncomputer]Pike:Ithinkthat’swhatScottasked--wastoclarify…”protectionoftheiracademic
freedom,”IthinkthatwasthesuggestionfromScott(Peters)afterminewasto
addacomma.
Zeitz:Replacethecommawithan‘and.’
Skaar:Didn’tScott(Peters)suggestreplacing‘and’with“duringshared
governance”?
Zeitz:Shouldn’titbe“protectionoftheiracademicfreedomwhileparticipatingin
sharedgovernance”?Sogetridof‘and’‘protection’and‘while’.
35
Pike:Wellthenthatlimitsittoonlyprotectingitwhilethey’reparticipatingin
sharedgovernance.
Campbell:It’savailableotherplaces.Wohlpart:Attheheadofyourpolicyyou’renowlimitingacademicfreedomto
justparticipationinsharedgovernance.
Cobb:Idohopethateverybodyknowsthattherearesomanychances—doyou
knowhowthepolicyreviewprocessworks?Jimmentionedit,butit’sjustlike
saying,“NowScott,youcanputthisforward.”Thenit’sposted,andsomebody
canreallyfigureouttheperfectwordingforit,andallthosegobacktoScott.
Theygetsenttopolicyreview.
Peters:They’llgotoGretchen(Gould)becauseit’stheSenate’spolicyCobb:Andthenthere’sanotherchancefortheFacultySenatetoactuallyapprove
orsendforwardthepolicythathastobedoneattheUniversitylevel,but--I
agreewithTim(Kidd)thatit’snicetogetitforward,buttherearesomany
chances,andIjustthoughtIshouldsaythat.
Gould:Thankyou.Scott(Peters)?Swan:Ihadaprocedurequestionwiththatthen.Socouldwepassthisasgeneral
ideasthatlotsofthefacultythinkmightbegood,butnotendorsingtheverbiage
asit’sgoingforwardtosenditthroughthisprocessthatyou’retalkingabout,that
thenwouldcomebacktotheFacultySenatetobeapprovedorrejectedafter
that?Sowecouldhavethatmotion,whichisquitedifferentthanmostpeople
36
havebeenthinkingaboutit,evenProfessorPeters.Butthatmightbeagoodway
tomoveforwardtoday.
Burnight:Thisissosad.[Laughter]Couldwejustforpurposesofgrammatical
sentence,couldwejusthaveacommaafterfreedom,andthenjustsay,
“includingprotectionwhileparticipatinginsharedgovernance”?
Pike:Whilehe’stypingthat,Ididhaveamotiononthefloortoapprovethis.I
wouldacceptafriendlyamendmenttochangethewordingtowhatyousuggest.
I’llmakethemotionthatwearepassingthisalongintothepolicyapproval
processforfurtherreviewfartherdowntheroad.Andthen,Iwouldlookfora
second.
Gould:IthasbeenmovedbySenatorPikeandsecondedbyVice-ChairWalter
thatwearemovingtoputthisintothepolicyreviewprocess.
Swan:Andjustfortherecorder,whathashappenedisthatthepersonwho
sponsoredamotiontoamendhasremovedthat,andhehasreplaceditwiththis
motion.Isthatcleartotherecorderfortheminutes?Good.
Gould:Allinfavorofthemotionputforthonthefloor,pleasesay,“aye,”all
opposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.
Swan:VerygoodProfessorPeters.Thisreallyhasbeenmanyyearsofalotof
workwithalotofpeople,soIcommendyouandthankyou.
37
Gould:Sowehavefiveminutesleft,unlessthereisamotiontoextendthe
meetingforfifteenminutesorevenless,fiveminutes?
Swan:Wecan’tdowhatweneedtodoinfiveminutesobviously.
Pike:Let’sgetgoingandseehowfarweget.Dhanwada:There’sstilltwoitemslefttobediscussed.Gould:AssociateDeanFunderburk,sorry.[Laughter]Let’sstartonthis
conversation.
Funderburk:Haveyoubeenabletopulltheseup?Haveyouseentheselearning
outcomes?They’vebeenoutthere.Theverycondensedversionisthatwe’ve
recommendedthreeUniversity-levellearningoutcomesthatamounttocritical
thinking,communication,andprogramcontentknowledge.Thesehavebeen
endorsedwiththiswordingfromallCollegeSenates.They’vebeenreviewedby
theUniversityCurriculumCommittee,theCouncilofDepartmentHeads,the…
Peters:they’vebeenreviewedinwriting.Wegotsomefeedbackfromthe
UniversityWritingCommittee,andtheywerealsosentinwritingtothedeansand
theassistantcouncil.
Funderburk:thisisaboutasvettedasanythingI’veeverseencometotheSenate
thusfar.Withtheideabeingthatourcommitteewentafterthelowhanging
fruit—thethingswethoughteverybodywouldbeabletoagreeon,andeasily
relatetheirprogram’slearningoutcomestothese,becauseatsomepoint,each
38
departmentwillhavetosay,“Howareweaddressingthis?”andwhatdoesthis
meantous?Sothat’swhatIhavetopresent.
Pike:Ijustwanttomakesure,becauseIrememberinCollegeFacultySenate,one
ofourdiscussionswas,theseareUniversity-level,soourdepartmentcouldfor
examplesay,“Wewanttomorespecificallydefinewhatcriticalthinkingisforus
andimplementthatasanobjective.”Soagain,thesearejustgeneral,University-
level,University-wide,so…nothing’sgoingtoconstrainattheCollegeorSchool
level?
Funderburk:Westruggledtomakethewordingasbroadaspossiblesoevery
departmentcoulddowhatevertheyfeltwastherightthingintheirparticular
area.
Pike:Consistentwith,andpotentiallyinadditiontothese.Funderburk:Exactly.Wohlpart:Thatwillbethenextstep,istoaskdepartmentstoinfactfleshout
whatthismeans,asJeff(Funderburk)said,toyourprogram.
Swan:So,somethinglikeimagination,wouldthatgounderprogramcontentfor
certaindisciplineswhoverymuchengageinimagination,techniquesof
imagination—developingthat?
Funderburk:Icouldseethatasprogramcontentundersomeareas.Withmy
ActingArtDepartmentHeadon,it’sprobablyundervisualcommunicationwith
meatthemoment.
39
Peters:Or,letmejustthrowthisoutaswell,whichisthatprogramsarefreeto
decidethattheyhavetheirownoutcomesthattheywishtoassess,aboveand
beyondthethreethatthey’rerequiredto--thethreethatalldepartmentswillbe
requiredto.
Swan:Canoneormoreofthoseadditionalonesbemoreimportantthananyor
allofthese?
Peters:Idon’tknowtheanswertothat.Wohlpart:They’reallthesame.Facultywillgettodecide.Everybodywilldo
criticalthinking,communicationandtheneachprogramwillsay,“Here’sthe
knowledgethat’simportantinhistory,philosophy,elementaryed.Here’sthe
skillsimportantinmydiscipline.”
Zeitz:What’sthereasonforcreatingthese?Withallthestandardsandeverything
thatwehavetocontendwith,andallofthemhaveallthisstuffinit,whyisit
doneonaUniversity-levelaswell?
Wohlpart:HigherLearningCommissionisexpectingthis.It’srequired.Funderburk:Becauseofourcondensedversion,thatwasthefirstslideinmy
PowerPoint.“Here’swhy.”
Pike:Sinceit’sabout4:59,canImakeamotiontoextendthemeetingforfive
minutes?
40
Gould:IhaveamotionbySenatorPikesecondedbySenatorSwanthatwe
extendthemeetingforfiveminutes.Allinfavor,pleasesay“aye,”allopposed,
“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.Wewillextendmeetingforfiveminutes.
Swan:Onelastquestion:Forexample,undercommunicationsattheend,“as
appropriatefortheirdisciplines,”sothatcouldbereallyquitesmall,isthat
correct?Eventhoughit’soneofthethreemajorcompetencies,foradiscipline,
thatcouldbevery,verysmall?Theywouldhavetodosomething,butitcouldbe
small?
Funderburk:I’mnotsayingthisistrue.Let’ssaymyareawasceramics,maybeI’m
satisfiedwiththewritingrequiredattheLAClevel,somyfocusisonamuchmore
rigorousvisualcommunicationstandardthanperhapsyourareawouldbe.
Swan:Andtocontinuewiththatthoughwiththeceramics,oftenthat’snotto
communicateanything.It’stoexpresswithoutnecessarilycommunicationinthe
art,andsothat’swhyitcouldbeevensmallerforthem.Isthattrue?Soit’s
appropriatefortheirdiscipline?
Funderburk:Exactly.That’swhatwe’retryingtogetat.Ithinkit’sclearthatoral
andwrittenarerequiredforeverysingleprogram.That’sintheLAC,soclearlywe
haveastandardthere.Wedon’thaveavisualcommunicationstandard,but
that’s…
Swan:SotheLACcanfulfillthisformanyprogramsthen?Wohlpart:Itcannot.
41
Peters:InresponsetoProvostWohlpart,Iwouldsaythatwasonepieceof
feedbackwegotfromCollegeSenates,wasthatpeoplewillneedmore
clarificationonwheretheLACfitsintothese,orhowtheLACfitsoverallinto
University-wideassessment.
Wohlpart:Oneofthethingsyoumustdowhenyougothroughaccreditationis
demonstratethatyourgraduatesmeetyouruniversitylearningoutcomes.And
manyofourstudentscometousfromotherinstitutions,perhapswithanAA.So
allyougetthemforisyourmajor.Sowhateveritisthatyoudoinyourmajor,
yourlearningoutcomeswillhavetomeettheUniversity-widelearningoutcomes.
That’sthereasonformakingthesebroad.YoucannotrelyontheliberalArts
Core,becauseyoudon’tknowthatyourstudentswilltaketheLiberalArtsCore.
NorwillyouknowwhattheyhadgottenintheirLiberalArtsCoreiftheyhavean
Associate’sdegree.Buthowyoudefinethem,inyourmajor,willbeuptoyou.
Skaar:Andthisisforgraduatestudentsandundergraduates?Wohlpart:Itwillbeforallprograms.Thatiscorrect.Allprograms.Zeitz:Willwehavetobedefininghowit’sbeingassessed?Wohlpart:Yes,whichwe’realreadydoing--butyes.Thiswillgiveusaformatforthat.Zeitz:Thankyou.Peters:Weexpectedwhenwedrewtheseupthatmostprogramsthatare
alreadydoingassessmentwillprobablybeabletopointtospecificoutcomesthat
they’vealreadyidentifiedandfitthemwithinthese,andthentheymayhave
42
somebeyondtheseaswell.Butwedidnotanticipate,infactwedesignedthis
intentionallyasmuchaswecould,sothatifprogramswerealreadydoing
assessment,theywouldbeabletoseewhatthey’redoingintherequirements.
Zeitz:Thankyou.
Swan:SoalotofprogramsintegratetheLACintotheirprogramsalreadyand
we’renowsayingthat’snotpossible?Wecan’tdothat?
Wohlpart:Thatiscorrect.Swan:SowhatistheLACfornow,forourgraduates?Wohlpart:Thewaythatlearningshouldbedoneisdevelopmentally.TheLiberal
ArtsCorewillalsohavetotakethisonasaprogram,andsay,“Ourlearning
outcomesfortheLiberalArtsCore,isX,Y,andZ,”andwillhavetoincludecritical
thinkingandcommunication,andthenotherthingsthatthefacultywilldecide,
andpresumablythatwillcreateafoundationalsetofknowledgethatyouwill
thenbuildoninyourmajors.
Swan:Yousaidwecan’tusetheLACanymore.Wohlpart:YoucannotusethelearningoutcomesthataredevelopedintheLACin
yourmajors.Youwillhavetoassesscriticalthinking,communication,and
whateverprogramknowledgeandskillsyousay,atwhateverlevel.
Gould:Seeingthatitis5:03,doesanybodywanttoputamotionforthwhetheror
nottotableit,tovoteonit,continuediscussionatthenextmeeting?
43
Zeitz:Imovewevoteonit.Gould:DoIhaveasecond?MovedbySenatorZeitzandsecondedbySenator
BurnighttoapprovetheUniversity-wideStudentLearningOutcomes.Allinfavor,
pleasesay“aye,”allopposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.CanIhavea
motiontoadjourn?CanIhaveamotiontoextendfortheB.A./B.Sthirty-twohour
requirement?It’sbeenmovedbySenatorBurnighttoextendthemeetingten
minutesandsecondedbyVice-ChairWalter.Allinfavor,pleasesay“aye,”
opposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Motionpasses.Ira,(Simet)pleasecomeup.
Simet:Thanksforaddingsometimetogettothisone.Aswementionedatthe
lastmeeting,we’vediscoveredthere’sabigdifferencebetweendoublemajors
anddoubledegreesintermsofrequirementsimposedbytheUniversity,andthat
differenceisa32-houradditionifyouwerepursuingadoubledegree,which
wouldbeintheexamplethatweweremostawareof,aBachelorofArtsanda
BachelorofScience.Wetriedtodoalittleresearchtoseewhatthejustification
wasfortheadditional32hours.Itgoesbackalongway,andwecouldn’tfindany
ofourowndocumentsthatspoketothat.Sowe’redecidingitmightbethe
residueofaresidencyrequirement,whichwetypicallyhaveforaseconddegree,
whenstudentscomebackhavingcompletedone.Or,theotherpossibilityisthat
thefacultyfeltatsometimethat32hourswastheminimumcontentneededfor
whatyouwouldcalladegree.Whicheverofthoseitis,welookedtosomeother
universitiesforsomeguidanceaboutthis.IowaStatehasthesamerequirement
aswedoessentially,buttheUniversityofIowarequiresnoadditionalhours.So
youcansee,therearetwoextremes.Andlookingatthetenpeerinstitutionsas
44
indicatedbytheRegents,therearefourorfivewhohaverequirementssimilarto
ours.Oneortwothathavenorequirementwhatsoever,andoneortwothat
don’tevengrantdoubledegrees--itdoesn’tevenappearintheircatalog,which
wetookaslicensetogoaheadandmakeaproposalforwhatwethoughtwas
right,andwhatwethingweshoulddoistoeliminatethe32additionalhoursfor
peopledoingconcurrentdoubledegree.Thisdoesn’tapplytopeoplewhoare
goingtofinishadegree,andthenayearortwolaterdecidethey’dlikeanother
degree,andtheywouldcomebackandharvestsomeextrahourstheyhadleft
overandusethose.Ifthatcasehappens,thenwhat’salreadyinthebooksis
separate,andthey’llhavetogoforaseconddegreecompletelyindependently.
We’retalkingaboutstudentswhoaretryingtogetbothdegreesatthesametime
Colin(Weeks)andIhavebeenworkingonthis.Evenatarandomlook—wedidn’t
evenhavetohuntveryhard,wefoundmanyexampleswhereyoucouldfinisha
BachelorofArtsandaBachelorofScience,thepairwewerelookingat,
completelyunderneaththeumbrellaofthe126hoursthatarerequiredforthe
B.S.,forexample.Sothose32hourswouldn’tevencontributetoeitherofthe
degreesyou’dbeenworkingon.Sowethoughtthatkindofdefeatedthepurpose
of32extrahoursasacontentofadegree,becausethecontentofthedegreeis
alreadythere.Andcertainlyanybodydoingconcurrentdegreeshasmetthe
residencyrequirement,sowethoughtthe32hourslookedlikeasurplus
requirementthatweshouldn’timposeanymore,andthat’swhywebroughtthis
proposaltoyou,toseehowyoufeelabouteliminatingthe32-hour,Iliketocallit
thesurcharge--forstudentstryingtodosomethingalittlemoreambitiousand
effectivelybeingpunishedforit.
45
Gould:AndyouhavevettedthiswiththeUndergraduateCurriculumCommittee
andtheRegistrar’sOffice?
Simet:Yes.FromtheRegistrar’sOffice,DianeWallaceisheretosupportthat,and
we’vealsogonearoundtoalltheCollegiateSenates.Weheardnoobjections.In
fact,weheardmurmursofsupport.Theonlyobjectionsweheardwerekindof
logisticalobjectionstothestructuredproposalactually,tomakesurethatallof
thepeerinstitutionswererepresented,thingslikethat.Butmostpeoplethought
itwasagoodidea.
Swan:Soeliminatingthesehours,therequirements--sowhat’sthemore
ambitiousthingthatthestudentisdoingingettingthetwodegrees?Iunderstand
thatwiththehourswehave,it’sveryambitious.Butnow,what’sthemore
ambitiousthing?
Simet:Wesee—IthinkmostpeopleseeaBachelorofScienceforexample,asa
morerigorousdegreethanaBachelorofArts.Certainlyinourdepartment,there
areadditionalcourses.It’slongerbysixhours.Thereareallkindsofarguments
thattheB.S.isamorerigorousdegree,andyetunderthetermsofthis,youcan
gettwoB.S.’smoreeasilythanaB.S.andaB.A.Wethinkthat’sbackwards.So
thatwasoneofthejustifications.
Swan:SoyourB.S.studentwillnowbeabletoalsogetaB.A.fordoingnothing
else?Justputtingittogether?
46
Simet:Well,ifthey’vecompletedtherequirementsforthatB.A.—nowtheycan’t
doitinourdepartment.TheoneweseemostoftenisaB.S.inBiologyandBAin
Chemistry.Sotheyhavetocompletetherequirementsforboth.Theydon’tget
offthehookforthat.Butwithdoublecountingandwithoverlapofcourses,it’s
nowpossibletofinishapairofdegreesandstillbewithinthe126hours.Sowe
don’tseethatthere’sajustificationfor32additionalhours,whichwouldn’teven
beinthosetwodisciplines.
Swan:Rightnowyousaidit’seasiertogettwoB.S.’sortwoB.A.’sandyou’rejust
tryingto…Isee.
Zeitz:Whatyou’resayingisthatyou’redoubledippingontheLACs?Onthe
LiberalArtsCourses?
Simet:Moststudentsalreadydothatifthey’redoingadoublemajororadouble
degree.This32-hoursisadditionaltoeverythingthat’salreadyproscribedto
them--theLACandalltherequirementsfortheirtwodegrees.Theycanstilldo
thatinunder126hours.Sowedon’tseeajustificationforanother32.
Zeitz:Iagreewithyou.IjustwanttomakesureIunderstand.Campbell:Ira,didyoulookbacktothetimewhenwefirstapprovedtheB.S.
degreetoseeiftherewasanythingfromthattimewhichreferredtowhyitwas
putin?
Simet:AllofthedocumentsthatIcouldfindabouttheB.S.werestrictlyfocused
ontheB.S.anddidn’tevenaddressthepossibilityofthistypeofdoubledegree.I
47
thinkthenotionatthetimewasthatstudentswouldsubstituteaB.S.foraB.A.,
sotheycouldaccessthemorerigorouscurriculum,andsothere’snotalkabout
thisatall.
Campbell:ButthatwasinthecatalogimmediatelyaftertheB.S.wasapproved?Simet:Thewordingofthisdidnotappearinthecatalogforawhile,ormaybe
Diane(Wallace)cancorrectmeonthat.Theformalwordingdidn’tshowupuntil
recently.Itwasapolicy,butitwasn’tformalizeduntilrecently,whenanumberof
studentswhowereseekingtodoitbegantogrow.Then…
Dhanwada:Ijustwanttosaythatthisisactuallyimpactingalotofstudents,and
it’sprohibitingthemfromcompleting,becausetheyarealmostdone,ortheyare
done,andbecausetheyhavetodotheadditional32hourstogetanotherdegree
whichisgoodforthemastheymoveforward,theyarenowchoosingnotto,
becauseit’sgoingtotakethemanextrayear.Thisisinfavorofstudentsaswell.
Studentsareforegoinganentiredegreebecausewe’reaskingthemtodo32
additionalcredits.
Walter:Imovethatweputtheproposaltoavoteimmediately.Gould:IthasbeenmovedbyVice-ChairWalter,andsecondedbySenatorPike
thatwevoteontheproposaltoeliminatetheadditional32-hourcredit
requirementforundergraduatesseekingaconcurrentundergraduatedouble
degree.Allinfavor,pleasesay“aye,”allopposed,“nay,”abstain,“aye.”Motion
passes.MayIhaveamotiontoadjourn?SomovedbySenatorBurnight.