Upload
venkata-dendukuri
View
231
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
1/64
Enhanced Interior GatewayRouting Protocol
(EIGRP)
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
2/64
Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
Successor to Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP)
Cisco proprietary hybrid protocol
Both Distance Vector and Link State (Active Adjacency)behaviour
Really Advanced Distance Vector
Classless protocol
Supports VLSM and summarization
What is EIGRP?
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
3/64
Guarantees loop-free topology
Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL)
Fast convergence Fastest of all IGP in certain designs
Reliable & Efficient Updating
Forms active neighbor adjacencies
Guarantees packet delivery with Reliable TransportProtocol (RTP)
Supports partial updates
Not all neighbors need all routes
Why Use EIGRP?
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
4/64
Multiple routed protocol support
IPv4, IPX, & Appletalk
Legacy now, but originally important in non-convergednetworks
Granular Metric
Hybrid metric derived from multiple factors
(bandwidth -K1, reliability -K2, delay -K3, load -K4, MTU -K5)
Seamless Connectivity across all data link layerprotocols and topologies
No special configuration is required
Why Use EIGRP? (cont.)
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
5/64
Unequal Cost Load Balancing
Only IGP that supports true load distribution
Control Plane Security
Supports MD5 based authentication
Why Use EIGRP? (cont.)
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
6/64
EIGRP sends out five different types of packets
Hello (5): Identifies neighbors and serves as a keep-alive
mechanism Update (1): Reliably sending route information
Query (3): Reliably requests specific route information
Reply (4): Reliably responds to a query
Ack (8): Non reliable packets used to acknowledgeupdate, query and replies
In detail
EIGRP Packet types
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
7/64
Hello packets are used for neighbor discovery andrecovery process
Sent as multicast
Unreliable Do not need acknowledgement packets
5 Seconds on Fast network links
60 seconds on Slow links (< T1 links)
3 times hello times is dead Can be changed using
ip hello-interval eigrp / ip hold-time eigrp interface command
Hello Packets
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
8/64
Hello packet Capture
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
9/64
Convey Route information
Sent to communicate routes that a router has used toconverge
Update is sent to affected routers
Updates are sent as multicast when a new route isdiscovered and convergence is completed
Updates are sent as unicast during synchronization oftopology tables at startup sequence
Updates are sent reliably
Update Packet
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
10/64
Update Packet
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
11/64
Query packet is generated when performing
Route computation
No Feasible successor Sends query packet to its connected neighbors if they
have a successor to the destination
Queries are multicast, can send unicast in certain
conditions Reliable packet and needs an acknowledgement
Query Packet
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
12/64
Reply is generated and sent across in response to a
query packet Reply packets are always unicast
Only reply to the originator of the query
Reliable packet, and needs an acknowledgement
Reply Packet
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
13/64
Used to ACK updates, queries and replies
Unicast hello packets contain a nonzeroacknowledgement number
Hello packet and ACK packet do not requireacknowledgements
A reliable packet is not acknowledged, EIGRPperiodically retransmits packet to neighbor as unicast,
EIGRP window size = 1, no other traffic is sent to thisneighbor
16 unacknowledged retransmissions, neighbor isremoved from neighbor table
Acknowledgement Packet
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
14/64
EIGRP uses three data table structures
Neighbor table: built from EIGRP Hellos and used for reliabledelivery
show ip eigrp neighbors [listed devices are ready to exchangetopology information]
Topology table: contains EIGRP routing information for thebest paths and loop-free alternatives
Show ip eigrp topology all-links
Show ip eigrp topology
Entry for a prefix can exists in two forms Active / Passive
Routing table: Places best routes from its topology table intothe common routing table
EIGRP Data Table Structures
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
15/64
Route is passive when the router is not performing
re-computation on that route Route will be active when it is undergoing re-
computation (looking for an alternate path)
Note: Passive state is operational and Stable state
A route will never go into active state if there arefeasible successor
Passive Vs. Active Routes
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
16/64
Step 1 - Discover EIGRP Neighbors
Step 2 - Exchange Topology Information Step 3 - Choose Best Path via DUAL
Step 4 - Neighbor and Topology Table Maintenance
How EIGRP Works
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
17/64
EIGRP uses multicast HELLO packets to discover neighbors onEIGRP enabled attached links Transport via IP protocol 88 (EIGRP) Destination address 224.0.0.10
Hello packets contain Autonomous System Number Hold Time (do not have to match) Authentication Metric Weightings (K values)
Neighbors found are inserted into EIGRP neighbor table show ip eigrp neighbors
Neighbors that agree on attributes and exchange updates formactive adjacency
Step 1 -- Discovering EIGRP Neighbors
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
18/64
Once neighbors are found, EIGRP UPDATE messages used to exchangeroutes Sent as multicast to 224.0.0.10 or as unicast
RTP uses sequence numbers and acknowledgements (ACKs) to ensuredelivery Update messages describe attributes of a route Prefix + Length Next-Hop Bandwidth Delay Load Reliability
MTU Hop Count External Attributes
All routes learned from all neighbors make up the EIGRP topology table show ip eigrp topology
Step 2 -- Exchanging TopologyInformation
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
19/64
Once topology is learned, DUAL runs to choose loop-free best path toeach destination
Unlike other protocols, EIGRP uses complex composite metric tochoose best path
Composite metric calculated from Administrative Weighting Bandwidth Delay Load Reliability
MTU Path with lowest composite metric is considered best and installed in IP
routing table One or more backup routes can also be pre-calculated per destination Only best route is advertised to other EIGRP neighbors
Step 3 -- Choosing The Best Path
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
20/64
Unlike RIP or IGRP, active EIGRP neighbor adjacencyreduces convergence time in event of network failure
Adjacent neighborshello packets contain hold time If no hello is received within hold time, neighbor declared
unreachable
When neighbor is lost Paths via that neighbor are removed from topology and
routing table
If backup routes exist, they become new best paths and areinserted in routing table In this case EIGRP can have sub-second convergence
If no backup routes exist, DUAL must run again
Step 4 -- Neighbor and TopologyTable Maintenance
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
21/64
When best path is lost and no backup routes exist, route goes intoactive state and active timer starts Stable routes not in active state are considered passive
EIGRP QUERY message is reliably sent to remaining neighbors
asking if there is an alternate route QUERY is propagated to all neighbors within EIGRP query
domain or flooding domain More on this later
Neighbors respond with EIGRP REPLY packet indicating ifalternate route is available If alternate route exists, DUAL recalculates new best path If no alternate route, prefix removed from topology table If active timer expires and no REPLY received, route is declared
Stuck-In-Active (SIA) and removed from topology table
DUAL Reconvergence
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
22/64
EIGRP guarantees loop-free topology through usage
of Split Horizon
Dont advertise routes out the link they came in on
DUAL Feasibility Condition
If your metric is lower than mine, you are loop-free
EIGRP Loop Prevention
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
23/64
Successor Nearest router to a destination
Feasible Distance (FD) Composite metric of best path
Feasible Successor (FS) Next nearest router to adestination
Advertised Distance (AD) Composite metric learnedfrom neighbor
Local Distance (LD) Composite metric to reach localneighbor
Feasibility Condition (FC) Criteria for valid backuppaths
DUAL Terms
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
24/64
Local Distance
1520
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
1
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
25/64
Local Distance
15LD =20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
1
LocalDistance costto reach R3 is
20
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
26/64
Local Distance
LD=15LD =20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
1
Local Distance
cost to reach R1 is20 and R5 is 15
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
27/64
Local Distance
LD=15LD=20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
LD=1
Local Distancecost to reach R3is 15 and VLAN X
is 1
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
28/64
Advertised Distance
LD=15LD=20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
LD=1
Local Distancecost to reach
VLAN X is 1
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
29/64
Advertised Distance
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
Local Distancecost to reach
VLAN X is 1
Advertiseddistance by R5 toreach VLAN X is 1
LD =15LD =20 LD =1AD VLAN X = 1
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
30/64
Advertised Distance
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
Local Distancecost to reach
VLAN X is 1
Advertiseddistance by R5
to reach VLAN Xis 1
LD =15LD =20 LD =1AD VLAN X = 1
Advertiseddistance by R3 toreach VLAN X is
15 (LD), 1(AD)
AD VLAN X = R3sLD + R5s AD
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
31/64
Feasible Distance
LD =15LD =20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
LD =1
Local Distancecost to reach
VLAN X is 1
AD for VLAN X is 1cost to reach
VLAN X is LD+AD
AD VLAN X = 1
Feasible Distance: Metric of Successor + LD (END to END Cost)
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
32/64
Feasible Distance
LD =15LD =20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
LD =1
Local Distancecost to reach
VLAN X is 1
AD VLAN X = 1
FeasibleDistance
is AD + LD
Feasible Distance: Metric of Successor + LD (END to END Cost)
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
33/64
Feasible Distance
LD =15LD =20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
LD =1
Local Distancecost to reach
VLAN X is 1
AD VLAN X = 1
Feasible Distance forVLAN X is
LD to R3 + AD by R3 for
VLAN X
Feasible Distance: Metric of Successor + LD (END to END Cost)
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
34/64
Feasible Distance
LD =15LD =20
R1 R3 R5
VLAN X
LD =1
Local Distancecost to reach
VLAN X is 1
AD VLAN X = 1
Feasible Distance forVLAN X is
LD to R3 + AD by R3 for
VLAN X
Note: It is FD that affects the selection of the best routes forincorporation in the routing table. AD is used only to calculate FD
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
35/64
Neighboring router to reach prefix
The route installed in routing table Least path cost to prefix
Has lowest FD of all possible paths to a prefix
Many entries in topology table with equal cost FD for a
prefix All successors (up to 4) for that destination in routing table
Successor
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
36/64
A EIGRP router with a back up route to the prefix
Route must be loop free Must not loop to current successor
FS are selected when successors are identified
FS paths are placed in topology table
Topology table retains multiple FS for a prefix
Requirements: Must Qualify Feasibility condition
Feasible Successor
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
37/64
The Neighborsadvertised distancemust be less thanfeasible distance ofthe current successorfor a prefix
Feasibility condition
10.1.1.0/24
Cost to10.1.1.0/24 is
1000
Cost to10.1.1.0/24
is 1500
LD = 1000
LD = 1000
FD for 10.1.1.0/24via A is 2000
FD for 10.1.1.0/24via B is 2500
A
B
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
38/64
Feasibility condition
10.1.1.0/24
A is theSuccessor
Cost to10.1.1.0/24
is 1500
LD = 1000
LD = 1000
A
B
Cost to10.1.1.0/24 is
1000
B is the
FeasibleSuccessor
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
39/64
Once adjacency occurs and update messages are
exchanged, path selection begins Each update includes the metric the upstream router
uses to reach destination (AD)
Local router knows the metric to reach each
upstream router (LD) Best path (successor) is chosen based on lowest AD +
LD
DUAL Path Selection in Detail
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
40/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
20
1015 20
20
R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
41/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
20
1015 20
20
R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
11
1
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
42/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
20
1015 20
20
R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
11
1
R2R5 x = 11R2R3R5 x = 26
11
11
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
43/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
20
1015 20
20
R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
11
1
11
11
R2R5 x = 11R2R3R5 x = 26
R3R2R5 x = 21R3R5 x = 16
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
44/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
11
1
11
11
R2R5 x = 11R2R3R5 x = 26
R3R2R5 x = 21R3R5 x = 16R3R4R5x=31
R4R3R5 x = 26R4R5 x = 21
21
21
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
45/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
11
1
11
11
R2R5 x = 11R2R3R5 x = 26
R3R2R5 x = 21R3R5 x = 16R3R4R5x=31
R4R3R5 x = 26R4R5 x = 21
21
2116
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
46/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
11
1
11
11
R2R5 x = 11R2R3R5 x = 26
R3R2R5 x = 21R3R5 x = 16R3R4R5x=31
R4R3R5 x = 26R4R5 x = 21
21
2116
AD for R1:11 vs. 16 vs. 21
FD to x:11+10 vs. 16+20 vs.21+15
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
47/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
11
1
11
11
R2R5 x = 11R2R3R5 x = 26
R3R2R5 x = 21R3R5 x = 16R3R4R5x=31
R4R3R5 x = 26R4R5 x = 21
21
2116
R1
R2
R5
x = 21R1R3R5 x = 36R1R4R5 x = 36
l
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
48/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
FD to x:Via R2 (21) vs. Via R3 (36) vs. R4(36)
Successor
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
49/64
Once best path is chosen, additional paths areexamined for backup routes
Feasibility Condition (FC) finds loop-free backup
routes via logic If AD < FD, path is loop-free and viable backup
e.g. if your metric is lower than mine, you are closer tothe destination and loop-free
Paths that meet the FC are Feasible Successors (FS) Only Feasible Successors can be used for unequal cost
load balancing
Feasibility Condition in Detail
l
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
50/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
R3R2R5 x = 21R3R5 x = 16R3R4R5x=31
R4R3R5 x = 26R4R5 x = 21
2116
R1
R2
R5
x = 21R1R3R5 x = 36R1R4R5 x = 36
Successor
DUAL E l
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
51/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
R3R2R5 x = 21R3R5 x = 16R3R4R5x=31
R4R3R5 x = 26R4R5 x = 21
2116
R1R2R5 x = 21
R1R3R5 x = 36R1R4R5 x = 36 FD = 21
Find path with AD < 21
Successor
X via R3 = 16
X via R4 = 21
DUAL E l
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
52/64
DUAL Example
10
10
15
10
1015 20
20R1
R2 R3 R4
R5
VLAN x
Local DistanceAdvertised DistanceFeasible Distance
R5 x = 1
R4R3R5 x = 26R4R5 x = 21
2116
R1R2R5 x = 21
R1R3R5 x = 36R1R4R5 x = 36 FD = 21
Find path with AD < 21
Successor
X via R3 = 16
X via R4 = 21
FeasibleSuccessor
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
53/64
Composite Metric - EIGRP
256 1 +2
256 + 3
5
+ 4
bw = 107 / minimum path bandwidth in kbps delay = interface delay in secs / 10
The concept of composite metric is always misunderstood
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
54/64
Bandwidth: Slowest between Source and Destination
Load: Worst load on a link between Source andDestination
Delay: Cumulative Delay along the path
Reliability: The worst reliability along the path
MTU: Smallest MTU on the path (not used in metriccalculation)
In detail
Metric Parameters
Composite Metric Calculation in Detail
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
55/64
Unlike other IGPs hop count or BW-based cost, EIGRP metric is a hybrid valuecomprised of
Lowest bandwidth along path in Kbps scaled by 107 * 256
Cumulative delay along path in tens of microseconds (s) scaled by 256
Worst load along path
Worst reliability along path Composite metric is computed as
metric = [k1 * bandwidth + (k2 * bandwidth)/(256 - load) + k3 * delay]
If k5 != 0, metric = metric * [k5/(reliability + k4)]
K values allow for manual administrative weighting
Must match for adjacency to occur Default K values are K1 = 1, K2 = 0, K3 = 1, K4 = 0, K5 = 0
Implies default composite is bandwidth + delay
Reliability and load typically not used since they are constantly changing
Composite Metric Calculation in Detail
d d h
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
56/64
Bandwidth
Bandwidth: Slowest between Source and Destination
100,000 Kbps
1544 Kbps
R1 R2 R3 R4
107 / BW = 10,000,000 / 1544 = 156250
Bandwidth is taken from configured interface BW
R1#sh int serial 0/0 | in BW
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
R1#sh int ethernet 0/0 | in BW
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
R1#sh int fastEthernet 0/0 | in BW
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
1544 Kbps100,000 Kbps 100,000 Kbps
Link Type Bandwidth Delay
10 Mbps Ethernet 10000 Kpbs 1000
100 Mbps Ethernet 100000 Kpbs 100
1 Gbps Ethernet 1000000 Kbps 10
Serial (
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
57/64
Worst load on a link between Source and Destination
Huge file transfer, load will vary
Load constantly keeps changing and DUAL calculatesfor successor, feasible successor
Not advised to use in metric calculation
R1#sh int fastEthernet 0/0 | in load
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Load
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
58/64
Delay: Cumulative Delay along the path
Represented in 10s microseconds R1 R2 100secs / 10 == 10
R2 R3 20000secs / 10 == 2000
R3 R4 100secs / 10 == 10
10 + 2000 + 10 = 2020
Delay
R1 R2 R3 R4
1544 Kbps100,000 Kbps 100,000 Kbps
100 secs 100 secs20000 secs
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
59/64
Reliability
The worst reliability along the path
Most of the times it is 255
Depends on keep alive between neighbors
Link flaps will change the reliability of the link
Not advised to use in metric calculation
Reliability will be calculated and informed to upper layerby Physical layer algorithms
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
60/64
MTU Smallest MTU on the path
maximum size of IP packet that can be transmittedwithout fragmentation
Media Maximum TransmissionUnit (bytes) Notes
Internet IPv4 Path MTU At least 68Practical path MTUs are generally higher. IPv4 links must be able to
forward packets of size up to 68 bytes. Systems may use Path MTU
Discovery to find the actual path MTU. This should not be mistaken
with the packet size every host must be able to handle, which is 576.
Internet IPv6 Path MTU At least 1280 Practical path MTUs are generally higher. Systems must use PathMTU Discovery to find the actual path MTU.
Ethernet v2 1500 Nearly all IP over Ethernet implementations use the Ethernet V2frame format.Ethernet (802.3) 1492
Ethernet Jumbo Frames 1500-9000The limit varies by vendor. For correct interoperation, the whole
Ethernet network must have the same MTU. Jumbo frames are
usually only seen in special purpose networks.WLAN (802.11) 2272
Token Ring (802.5) 4464FDDI 4352
Composite Metric
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
61/64
All Links are Fast EthernetBW = 100,000 KbpsDLY = 100 Sec
Loopback = 10,000,000Kbps
DLY = 5000 Sec
Advertised DistanceFeasible Distance
Composite Metriccalculation
Loopback R1
R2 R3 R4
R5 Loopback: 5.5.5.5/32
256 1 +2
256 + 3
5
+ 4
Composite Metric
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
62/64
All Links are Fast EthernetBW = 100,000 KbpsDLY = 100 Sec
Loopback = 10,000,000Kbps
DLY = 5000 Sec
Advertised DistanceFeasible Distance
Composite Metriccalculation
Loopback R1
R2 R3 R4
R5 Loopback: 5.5.5.5/32
256 1 +2
256 + 3
5
+ 4
R5s Metric Calculation to reach 5.5.5.5/32Values: K1 = K3 = 1 (default)
bw =07
0,000,000=
0,000,000
0,000,000 = 1
delay =000
0= 500 Sec
Substituting bw and delay into the give formula
256 * ( 1*1 + 1* 500) = 256 * ( 1 + 500) = 256 * (501) = 128256
Composite Metric
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
63/64
All Links are Fast EthernetBW = 100,000 KbpsDLY = 100 Sec
Loopback = 10,000,000Kbps
DLY = 5000 Sec
Advertised DistanceFeasible Distance
Composite Metriccalculation
Loopback R1
R2 R3 R4
R5 Loopback: 5.5.5.5/32
256 1 +2
256 + 3
5
+ 4
CostforLoopbackis128256(AD)
Composite Metric
8/3/2019 03 - Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
64/64
All Links are Fast EthernetBW = 100,000 KbpsDLY = 100 Sec
Loopback = 10,000,000Kbps
DLY = 5000 Sec
Advertised DistanceFeasible Distance
Composite Metriccalculation
Loopback R1
R2 R3 R4
R5 Loopback: 5.5.5.5/32
2 5
CostforLoopbackis128
256(AD)
R2s Metric Calculation to reach 5.5.5.5/32Values: K1 = K3 = 1 (default)
bw =07
00,000=
0,000,000
00,000 = 100
delay =000
0= 500 Sec
Substituting bw and delay into the give formula
256 * ( 1*100 + 1* 500) = 256 * ( 1 + 500) = 256 * (501) =8 6