; wN SCALE: 1: 2OOOf2/2/82 —

\_ • .- " .—*• - / . I /»«•'

/ XN; w

<s

SCALE: 1": 2OOOf

PROJECTSITE

-> V *.- - r!=y-- * —*• \ . iHope

•t «•^^-\VoodJa* ni

-. -, , >x'•** •_'•

'V rr>7rV -- :'"r^ A:i C »

-. >:XX "/ • so-

GENERAL LOCATION MAPFIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

CHECKED Jr. VMBIPROJKT NO= 81C8017 A iDATeVyF»b_82WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS

CONSULTING ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS ANO EHVmOUMEHTfr,L SCtEHTlSTS

I*vv

9CE-81-0200

S Scale 1" : 40'kJO / ,, /

CE-81-(i-02or&-1° /CELL/

/ V/ H*8^ #•CE-

Iron Pin 2

Key:

iîoag'^

~" "" —— ' — \

TransferStation ——?

-A*^y — Boring and Monitoring Well LocationCE-81-0195 - State Permit Number _

«••«•_ Approximate Boundary of Cell AMOTET- (based on information provided by Fire stone andUV 1 » *** 4 ~*t ftl«...f.M«i\' w — State ot Maryland)Monitoring Wells and Existing Facilities Located by PELSA, Elkton , MarylandWell 4 Installed In Previous WCC Investigation ; Welt 1 Installed by PLn4K8T-.

BORING AND MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAP* ' °° ! i'MFIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

DRAWNBY: MWK|CHECKED BY: VMBJPROJECT NO: 81C8017A DATE: QFeb'82 IPIOURE NO 2WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS

CONSULTING ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS

j

*

2" PVC CAP OR PLUG

1/8" DIAM. WEEP HOLE

4' DIAM. STEEL CASINGW/HINGED, LOCKING CAP

CEMENT-BENTONITEGROUT

2* PVC RISER PIPE

BENTONITE SEAL

THREADED FLUSH JOINTS(THREADS WRAPPED TFE TAPE)

SAND PACK

2" PVC WELL SCREEN

ARJOOI78TYPICAL MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DESIGN

FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILLDRAWN sv:MWK ICHECKED BY:VMB PROJECT NO= 81C8017A JDATE:3Feb'82 FIGURE NO: 3

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTSCONSULTING ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS

480--I-J________ _10_ I \ l..«.:-. •» -T-« -. -r

S 460u.

§ 440S»5

420

400-j

»&-.-_-

.

,:S.v«"*£;.:.~*xi.,'>•&'.••

•

:>*•:; . »,?33$s•:>T:5->- *£'-'£i;.—_—_—_—_ r_— _— _ -~ r—~ ~—-"—""— - — "isT— "i.' __ _ — . — — • — .— • - • .;,.-, .'- -: ,v, . -..: •••,-.•• • ',. . - -:•I S' fe4, a.s:;,-/v:-;i .:€;*: ; .y:-.- -;... .s-v-fy's ,;:;-:..v te %::"s.>;;v, ; S ^

i ilSC ---& " ' '%'!K;

?V ~ .'?$$••;•••'?•.••• *.v.:.:Xt»_-lj' . _ _ _ J >£jr-.:--=:-,-_ _ - _ * -— .^>.'' • ' . . Vf • • ' • . . - .i ,. •••• •». •• -•. ••: .v. •• -..;>:,-, c'-i&.-.-.Vi.o::'",.. -•;;;:.y.f vV m'itKli. i&••••'•?rft'':.-:,'\ ';r%i;Sv :tfiiif

>;-•':->-T"-. . /',v••Jr..-. •:,•'*<; <'••: •'s

480-

• 460-.

440-

Seal* 1" : 40*

8 48°' • • ••-''•'--'•'•*;i •:•!•:•-;i'':--:*'jt"-"*- * M

i-'r ••V* ' ^ ^ S? . -i——*•• ? 460-

e ..- 44OM

5 420-O**

| 420-2

400-

ED CELL A RLL

§S| FILL

l--:£vl BRYN MAWR (sllty sand & gravel)

IB I POTOMAC GROUP (clayey silt isilty sand)

lf • \ SAPROLITE («Hty sand)Refer to Logs of Borings for more complete descriptions.

GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTIONS AT SITE________________FiRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL______________DRAWN BY: MWK [CHECKED BY: VMB|PROJECT NO: 81C8017A (DATE: 26 Mar'82 FIGURE NO: 4

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTSCONSULTING ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS

Approx Boundary of Cell «-^-• \

403.4

Approx Boundary of Cell C

Scale 1*:100'Contour Interval: 1'

Transfer Station

CALCULATED FLOW DIRECTION(1) WELL NUMBER

,«- - GROUNDWATER FLOW LINES—— GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS403.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION M WELL

NOTE: Contours and flow line* bo*4§ B ffuftsfte)n&tr)obtained on 2 February 1982.; TonfVuH exPofwIotedbetween welli and moy vary from what it 'shown.

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURSFIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

RAWN BY: MWK CHECKED BY: VMB PROJECT NO: 81C8017A DATE : 8 MAR '82 FIGURE NO: 5

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS

Woodward-Clyde Consultant

I I FIGURE 6* •• , MONITORING WELL FIELD SAMPLING RECORDS

FIRESTONE CELLS A AND B/C - WOODLAWN LANDFILLCECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND

*\ ce-st-oiis•• - oils

— -o/<?<:

i

7 ™

Jir

J

'MiJ

J

J

Jf

J

6<ce>on 4 eiceotjf,MIX

V76.T5/of23V?6J-8to

IOCATIOR

^ r"JI/ formsCfJIC

Ctts c

Ctil C

£C$/A

Ct-l/AA) rf<bd/iV/xi .S-Xf

x;«a/- tfuy/y

OtFTH TOuca lonoM«.*'

W.97*.7'f/.?'76.3'n.z'7t.«'

37.2'3f.0r

Ot'TX TOSTATIC MTII

«?'

HI. 7'

3*?'flT '

70.!'

*£*'&8.(.'30.0'ZH.Z

67-3"tl'-l'*i*ZH'-n'</£'-3$'To'(.S'

•OilMEwoecoV/

/%yMztJ&J.113J4181

"T«i52« * /To*11 TIME

CKLtCTtD

1338(ZSZ

HloH2DIH3SHSO

^ g. Betsey

H£SC»V*TIV£5

/ Ovr

^

(udl'l UôUJ i- l d botV ; 7> ,*>.*'

™tZc£tff*'t2i£*MtiUP.L10.

ft3

I.OC1TIW

.'

ocnn TOuru IOTTW OIFTH TOST1TIC U<TC*

67-^'Z9-^"»'-»V

S5SS

FICLO fllT{R£0f«l H*

*

\

DATE

MM.ISISlEQKKtO

K%A%

i fi u i ^t * »t Jtouj" "tep CM CA* ,»M 1r o/

JA.l?LE«J / gg/Z6.yj / g ftftSet.H. £*-<J-+g.HEIt 1 (i-Lf)

UWA.E"0.

TIMECOtLtCTtO

/fooisioIS2S

MCSCV «WtS

/USAJf

1

/

riCLD Hilt It EDrts f*

X

1

)

AR

DAT I

UOUilS

»•<;«, 75', H**t,tJififf tftnlfI/CM, To>,

VCH, Tot,

IOOI8

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

TABLE 1ELEVATIONS OF MONITORING WELLS


' Well Elevation of Elevation ofNumber Top of Well Casing (ft) Ground Surface (ft)

4 470.25 468.3

I5 446.97 445.0

6 437.25 435.9

' 7 443.S9 441.7

* 8 473.42 471.3

| 9 471.64 470.2

| 10 468.84 467.2

• I 474.28 472.1

- 2 430.33 429.0

3 420.72 419.7I

Note: Base elevation datum is mean sea level n n i oo

TABLE 2 Woodward-Clyde Consultants

I

I

I

I

ELEVATIONS OF STATIC WATER LEVELSIN MONITORING WELLS


Well 1

Well 2

Well 3

Well 4

Well 5

Well 6

Well 7

Well 8

Well 9

Well 10

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

DepthElev.

26 Jan. '82——

——

____

67.1403.2

45.4401.6

35.4401.9

41.7402.2

70.1403.3

_«»•»•

65.7403.1

28 Jan. '82

——

— — _ -

67.1403.2

45.4401.6

35.5401.8

•41.9402.0

70.1403.3

——

____

2 Feb. '82

70.9403.4

30.2400.1

24.5396.2

67.2403.1

45.6401.4

35.7401.6

41.9402.0

70.3403.1

68.8402.8

65.8403.0

11 Feb. '82

....

401.4

397.0

403.8

402.3

402.4

402.8

403.9

403.7

403.8

18 Feb. '82

——

29.3401.3

23.9396.8

67.2403.1

45.2401.8

35.2402.1

41.7402.2

70.2403.2

68.6403.0

65.8403.0

Note: Depth measurements in feet from top of well casing.Elevation datum is mean sea level.Measurements by Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.

HR100I83


TABLE 3ESTIMATED AQUIFER HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITIES

BASED ON FIELD SLUG TEST DATAFIRESTONE CELLS A AND B/C - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

CECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Hydraulic ConductivityNo- (cm/sec) (ft/day)

4 9.1xlO-6 0.03

5 2.1 x 10- 5 0.06

1.2x10-" 0.33

2.0x10-" 0.58

1.4xlO-5 0.04

8.6xlO-6 0.02

10 1.2x10-" 0.35

ARIOOI81*

*r;*3'-':-wav-*-*

1

I

I

I

I

Woodward-Clyde Consultantsi'i

, TABLE 4MONITORING WELL SAMPLE TEST RESULTSFIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

CECIL COUNTY, MARYLANDSAMPLING DATE: 2 FEBRUARY 1982

PARAMETER

Arsenic

Barium

Cadmium

Chromium (Total )

Lead

Mercury

Selenium

Silver

Vinyl Chloride (ppb)

Benzene (ppb)

Toluene (ppb)

WELL 8

<0.002

<0.1

<0.001

0.01

<0.01

<0.001

<0.002

<0.005

<1

2

2000

WELL 9

<0.002

<0.1

<0.001

<0.01

<0.01

<0.001

*0.002

<0.005

<1

4

4250

WELL 10

<0.002

<0.1

<0.001

0.01

<0.01

<0.001

<0.002

<0.005

<1

3

3160

MCL*

0.05

1.0

0.01

0.05**

0.05

0.002

0.01

0.05

2f0.66t350 tt

1430Qttt

infcL•

Note: Concentrations expressed in mg/1 except as noted.* - Maximum Contaminant Level for metals (Primary Drinking Water Standards)**- MCL for Cr+st - 10-6 Health Risk Criterion (Federal Register - 28 November 1980)ft - 7 day Suggested No Adverse Response Level (SNARL)

tff - Ambient Water Criterion (Federal Register - 28 November 1980)

A R I O O I 8 5


1I

I1

1

i

1

f

TABLE 5SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTSFOR VOLATILE COMPOUNDS


"•s Parameter^ X ^

Well No. ^

Well 1

Well 2

Well 3

Well 4

Well 5

Well 6

Well 7

Well 8

Well 9

Well 10

ConcentrationLimits

VINYL CHLORIDESample Period2/2/82

--

25

2

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

2/11/82

--

32

2

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

<1

2*

BENZENESample Period2/2/82

—

<1

53

3

2

2

2

2

4

3

2/11/82

—

<1

54

4

<1

1

2

1

4

2

0.66* ; 350**

TOLUENESample Period2/2/82

—

1

133

3460

48

1310

1410

2000

4250

3160

2/11/82

—

3

203

2650

30

1310

1080

1390

3650

2620

14300f

jtf Note: Results expressed in parts per billion (ppb)

* - 10-6 Health Risk Criterion (Federal Register - 28 November 1980)[• ** - 7 day Suggested No Adverse Response Level (SNARL)

t - Ambient Water Criterion (Federal Register - 28 November 1980)

1AR I 00 I 86

UNIFIED SOIL. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

1 Major dS»«ion»

"ZM

i§?0\M^1siSi

"51|

IF

In

i-

gr

et

na

d toi

li(Mora than

half of

malarial lt

*ma/fer t

han No. 200 i

lava)

Gravatt '

IMora than

half of co

ana fraction

largar

than No

. 4 ila

va il

ia

Sandt

(Mora than

half of

coarca fr

action

It tmalltr than No

. 4 ilava i

lia)

Claan g

ravalf

l(LI

ttIa o

r no

flnaa

tGravali w

ith t

inat

(Appreciable amount

of fi

nai)

Claan undi

ILIttI

a or n

o fkie

i)th fi

nal

la amount

Ml

*•*£*l**l

Silti

and c

layi

(Liquid lim

it tan t

han G

O)Sll

ti and c

layi

(Liquid lim

it gr

aatar t

han GO)

•H-|&1S o

Group• flflBOtS

GW

GP

dGM — —

u

GC

SW

SP

dSM ——

u

SC

ML

CL

OU

MH

CM

OH

Pt

Typical namaa

WalKgradad grwals. gravaNandmixture*, linla or no finas

Poorly gradad gravak. grava*-sand mixtures. Krta or no f inaa

Silty grawals. graval land airtmixtura*

/

Oayay uraoaU. graval aand claymixturaa

•Wall-graded sands, gravellysands, littt* or no finas

Peorfy gradad sands, gravellysands, littie or no fines

Sitty sands, sand-silt mixtures

Clayey sands, sand-day mix-tuns

Inorganic silts and very finesends, rock ftour.silty or day-ay fin* sands or dayay siltswith slight plaaticrtyInorganic days of low to me-dium plasticity, gravelly days.sandy days, sUty days, leandays

Organic sirts and organic sirtydays of low plasticity

Inorganic silts, micaceous ordiatomaceous fine sandy Ksilty soils, elastic silts

Inorganic days of high plea-ticity. fat days

• Organic days of medium tohigh plasticity, organic silts

Peat and other highly organicsoils

Laboratory daasification criteria aflaek

Determine percentage of

sand an

d graval from grain-lira cu

rve.

Depending on pe

rcentage of

f inn (fr

action

tmallar t

han No. 200 i

lava a

lia), co

araa-gralncd

tolli ar

a clawlf led a

s followi:

Less th

an 5 pe

r cent . .................

.GW.GP.SW.SP

Morathin

12parcant ................

.GM.GC.SM.SC

60

SO

40

i*MSa.

20

10740(

j

>

i

I!

it

ii•«sD

0,0 <°*>>*Cu-j-graatar than 4; VO|OXD«B bttVM**fl t " 3

Not maating all gradation requirements for GW

Atterberg limits below "A"line or PJ. lest than 4

Attarberg limits above "A"Una with P.I. graatar than 7

Above "A" line with PJ.batwaan 4 and 7 are tordar/int cases requiring useof dual symbols

0«o tDyat*C.- —— graatar than 8: C-- -•• ' batM*an 1 and 3do 0ioXJD»

Not maating all gradation raquiramanfflor SW

Attartoarg limits balow "A"lint or P.I. l«i than 4

Anarbafg limits abova "A"lint with P.I. graatar than 7

Limits plotting m tugMfczone with P.I. betw Band 7 are bordtHintC^trequiring use of dual synvbols.

I

jUaoi1 Or*1 — At— hat

fia•vr

ni*

r daesiflcstion of fit and fin* fractionined soils.tarbarg Limits pichad araa ara bordtiitiona raquiring u«nbois.nation of A-tine:PI-0.73 «LL:20»

ZL-M&

-CL-

f*

s/f-ML»

na*gntof coa

ottin;•linadii of c

o..r.//f

dOL.

raa- ""

in

f ———s

i5>V

I-i

sf._ 7/.,_/s—— ——

t 1f/f

jf/

OHanaMH, ,— _,„..

e-f- SHV -fi-n-D-4- J-U- -O-/ -=r) 10 2O 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 H?

Liquid LimitPlasticity Chart

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTSAim CUUIOflUUCMTll

1

<

<

i

i 1W *EPTH|?-

:i5-

g jQD BLOWS nFQrRIPTinW we LL PL(%Ra5OCf>rtT "^ Ca» a/ a/ 11 • 1 1 1 V»/ IM «V iV ' ttj» ^ •• *• a* •) \f \f 1 a» ^ 9

7 ô VERY STIFF, MOIST, BROWN, SILTY

UNIFIED SOIL. CLASSIFICATION^

————— NUMBER OF BLOWS REQUIRED TOADVANCE SAMPLER ONE FOOT , ,

• ———————————— ; ————— ROCK CORING: >'ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION

PERCENT RECOVERY

U/ATCB «t«\aive>«v . , . „

ATTERBERQ LIMITS ——————————————

UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ————————

ucs DRY"C* DEN*•' pcf

P *SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONS-*-2-IN.O.D. SPLIT- BARREL SAMPLER DRIVEN BY A 140- Ib HAMMER FALLING 30-IN.

V .^.UNDISTURBED SAMPLES TAKEN WITH HYDRAULICALLY PUSHED 3-IN. O.D.THIN-WALLED TUBE SAMPLER

i "*~BAG SAMPLE

• —-NX SIZE DOUBLE TUBE CORE BARREL

I 13 SACK SAMPLE OF SOIL

AR 00 88i

KEY TO BORING LOGSFIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

DRAWN BY: MWK CHECKED BY: VMB| PROJECT NO: 81C8017A JDATE: 3Feb'82 FIGURE NO: A-2

WOODWARD.™ VHP

LOCATIKEY TOSURFAC

DEPTH

_

5:

10-

15 —

20—

-

25—

30—

J5—

0 —

Ul

fiin

UJ

*.4<fl

\

I

I

I

I

I

ON See Figure 2 DATE DRIILED ih-I'j Januarv 1982 1BORING LOGS See Figure A-2 WATER i PVPL See Table 2 |E ELEVATION -1*71.3' DATP MEASURED 1*ROD%REC

DRAWN BY: MWK

BLOWSFOOT

37

k

2

27

29

25

36

1*0

DESCRIPTION

Soft, moist, brown and gray clayey SILT (ML)with sand and trace gravel - FILL

'

Medium dense, moist, brown, silty SAND (SM)with gravel - FILL

Medium dense to very dense, damp, brown,gray, white, black, red, silty fine SAUD (SM)

Decomposed Bedrock

we

A

LL

U

PL

)0

ucstef

89

DRYDENpcf

LOG OF BORING 8FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

CHECKED BY: VMB PROJECT NO: 81C8017A DATE: 3Feb'82 f'(CURE NO: A-"*

>

45-H

so H

55-

65-H

75-H

80H

Ul

Medium dense to very dense, danp, brown,gray, white, black, red, silty fine SAND (SM)

Decomposed Bedrock

31

50

51

1*8

Termination Depth 76.5'

LOG OF BORING 8 (CONTINUED)FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

DRAWN BY: MWK__ —— ———— i ————— • „., erti-r *CHECKED BY: VMS PROJECT NO: 81C8Q1/ACHEC BY ^J ———————— ————

______YVOODWARO-CLYDE CONSULTANTS

1 —— -

~3P$&5Z%

1

1

**-••A

'&• • .

'..|-;

•.•:'"•

* .•*'_ .

•f\

'•' f -

I-I-:

'.'**'

j:

-;;:•'_•

•'•".<:"*•'•'/ '*

1

r

—

Il

:''~.7RS*. • 4 ——————

w —— ~•'*: *. _

• •;' ' « —————————

%•"

1" >

i•::+ ———

j' -, , ..

i1i•i«%:~.\v-v .

State Permit No. CE-81-0199

Fievation of top of riser pipe l*T3-1;2 .__ M

Ground elevation !*71t3

I.D. off surface easing . U-inchType of surface casing STEEL ,.,. ,„„.PIPE WITH LOCKING CAP

I.D. of riser pipe 2-inchTyp« of '**«' p'p« PVCplamater of borehole j*-inch ,„..,., .,.

Type Of backfill CEMENT-BEHTONITEGROUT

Type of seal BENTONITE 4jDepth of top of sap| 6.1 FT ^

Depth of top of sand pack 63_.FT .

n^pth «f t«p of screen 6"5 FTType of screened section 0.015-in.

slot PVC

I.D. of screened section 2-inch

Depth of bottom of well 76.5 FT

Depth of hot* 76.5 FT

ftRioomREPORT OF MONITORING WELL 8 ^1FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL 1

ORAWNBY:MWK JCHECKED BY. VMB | PROJECT NO: 81C8017A (DATE: 9Feb'82 JFIGURE NO: A-l*

..__........ ..... CONSULTANTSCONSULTING ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK

A.RI60I92

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK

ARIQQI93

HRHDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.Soils oncf foundation fnginwt

tlCORD OF SOIL EXPLORATIONTB-2

Baring •Job. HA82009

Cecil County, Maryland!

j !_<( El«u 429 -Q Ft. M__.. u,.. 30 u. R.ck C«.. D.. Uti

i1 -j _ik :k~j••LF ^

_1 z

••MH l

h 5va_i

fc-•*•

* :•WH

d r

i" -!j -r -

f

euev.

415.4

429.9 ft. HMWH« Uro..3/3/82 „. rip. si>. 2 IB. R»..«f

9OIL DESCRIPTION STRACal«r,H»iMur«. Dmsiijr. PlaKicity. Sis* OCPTl-

Black, multi-coloredwet landfill debris

White and tan, moist.very stiff to hardmicaceous SILT withlittle sand, tracerock fragments

L4 5

u..k.j HSA D.,,

DEPTH SAMPLESCALE Cond

D

D

10—. ——D

•low*/*" 1

4-3-9

10-2-4

3-3-11

15— ——D

20-.D

25-1 —D

30-» ——D

6-7-14

6-8-9

7-10-15

8-11-16

35-. ——D

40

SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS OROU

o% • oMivcN SPLIT >POON o . oniMTceMATco *' COM»T • PKCStCD »MKL,»V TU»K I. INTACT »rTt*.e« . CONTIMUOU* ru»«MT »uo«n 0 . UNOISTUWBCO »rTt*

8-16-20

4*.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

TXM i

DS «

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

ND WATER DEPTH...r. DRY* rT

"•* 'T..... DRY**,,

Ue

'

2

10

4

8

6

8

>

- —— i

M>

crocwe

•ORING*S/H»»UNGNOTES

*Caved at 46.0***Caved at 45.5*

MET!

IPeNET«*T,ON TEST-OR.V.MG 2" OD SAMPLER .' «.TH !«• HAMMER r*LL.NG 30": COUNT Q g j g

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTLancaster Laboratories... ^ I-LI s™*^ <* ww <.r*nB

Date RePOT'tod S/S5/8Date Bubrni ' ted £.'1 i/82D i sc;3 rd D..J -„c? T / 4/G2

Fires tone Tire &. Rubber Co. P. O. No. AH 1417

Woodlawn Landfill Well #2Sample collected 2/11/82 by LLI

ANALYSIS AS RECEIVED LAB CODE

Vinyl chloride '32. ppb 999-70-O5QOGBenzene < 1 • PPb 999-70-G50OOToluene 3. ppb 999-70-QOSOO

Well tt2

Well sampled without purging at 0.5 m above uiell bottom using a Kemmerer^Nrnplsr, E/ll/BE by LLI. The above analyses were performed on samplescollected in three baked, teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon site.

Concrete pad: 4S9.6S' MSLSWL : 4O1.41' MSL

2 COPIES TO Firestone Tire &. Rubber Co. Attn: George Markert1 COPY TO CHEM II

ARI 00195 _

1NV TU- F-irestone Tire & Rubber 105.GO 373 Respectfully submittedLancaster Labur,, tones, Inc."-o-

MAIN LABORATORY:- ' 2425 New Hollanc) Pike- Lancaster, Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301

FRANKUN DIVISION: •PO, Box 467. 5424 Buchanan Trail East R,• .W . -• f I':. :; i . ,-. • . M £. .

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTLancaster *. '-LJ ""•-'« *< * ^

D u t e K p L j ; • t e >., J.! / 5 fr, / Cui;Date? iubvni ite'J £.« ,1/or'Di<:::c.-ird LVi i a 5,- *..-O2

Fires tone Tire & Rubber Co. P. u. No. ;'iH 41-4-17

Wood lawn Land F i l l Well 1*3Sarnp le collected ,£ / 1 1 / Gc.


Vinyl chloride 2. ppb 999-70-Q5OOOBenzene 54. ppb 999-7O-O5OOOToluene 203. ppb 999-7O-OO50O

Well #3

Well sampled without purging at 0.5 m above well bottom using .a Kemmerersampler, 2/11/B2 by LLI. The above analyses were performed on samplescollected in three bakt.'d. teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon sits.

e t e pa d : 450 .40' MSL: 397.03' MSL

2 COPIES TO Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Attn: George Markert1 COPY TO CHEM II

INV TO- Firestone Tire & Rubber 105.00 ?^3 respectfully submittedLcinc.av;. tuT" Labors tot i ivs , Inc:.A• j-*** >

MAIN LABORATORY:AJV. 2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster. Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301f/.' FRANKLIN DIVISION:

i) „ r~ DOfsf&t [~ 'tfz

/ / /' — ' *

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT^|> Lancaster Laboratories ^ u.r s^ * > „ , w 173.so.

» v ~ - ' i ' ' I'ale Repcir'ted eV2'>/B2|j«te> Sub..--., r • .:.,-j S/: ;/82

I- . Discard Date.- B/ •'i/EJc!Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. ,,-•/_-<• P- L"'' ^Q> ^J--^"'

Wood lawn Landfill Well 4*4Sample collected 2/11/82 by LLI


Vinyl chloride < I. ppb 999-70-05OOOBenzene 4. ppb 999-70-05OOOToluene 2650. ppb 999-7O-O050O

Well #4 I.D. CE-S1-O195 Near entrance road

Well sampled without purging at 0.5 m above well bottom using a Kemmerersampler, S/ll/82 by LLI. The above analyses were performed on samplescollected in three baked, teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon site.

Casing Top: 470.55' MSL5WL : 4O3-.33' MSL

2 COPIES TO Firestcne Tire & Rubber Co. Attn: George Markerti COPY TO CHEM II

BR100197

IMV TO- Firestonfc? Tire & Rubber 1O5.OO SVJf- Pt.-;'if<e'~' "ul 3 / subnu t tt?dL.-iTiCM-j.ter LabC'i',.-i'.urie-:-, Inc.

>v MAIN LABORATORY:v MAIN LABORATORY: /j p'- 2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301 IdOr T [~ [ZfZf}, FRANKLIN DIVISION:

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTLancaster Laboratories, -... •,, *••<- > 3™p^ «•<

D:vte Submitted i/ll/OEDiscard Date 3/ 4/82

r i res tone' Ti re & Rubber Co.. P. (J. No. AH 41417

Wood lawn Landfill Well ttSSample collected 2/11/S2 by LLI


Vinyl chloride < 1. ppb 999-70-O5OOOBenzene < 1 . ppb 999-7Q-05OOOToluene 3O. ppb 999-7O-O05OO

•Jell ttS I.D. CE-S1-O198 SE Corner of Cell C

Well sampled without purging at 0.5 m above well bottom using a Kemmerersampler, 2/11/82 by LLI. The above analyses were performed on samplescollected in three baked,' teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon site.

TCP: 446.97' MSLSWL : 4O2.3O' MSL

E COPIES TO Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Attn: George Markert1 COPY TO CHEM II

A R I O O I 9 8

INV TO- F"irestune TireT& Rubber 105.00 393 Respectfully submittedv,^ Lfijncflst£?r Laboratory c?s, Inc.

,r/u£- MAIN LABORATORY: {-)!jy.j):'; 2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301 A. r><S/r /_

EL*

-Ju!o 1

'Uo<u_

oo

7±**#&

T?

\

ifIII

'

I

4

LCKi

IPpom

5-

•M

•Ml

10-•••

•••

^

«•

15—

|:20—

25-

30—

35—

Jt _

W ~~~

>CATION See Firure 2 DATP DRILLED 25 Januarv 108?•Y TO BORING LOGS See Figure A-2 WATCP LEVEL _ SPP Talnlp ?RF CE ELEVATION 470.2' __ _ RAT* ueAcimpn

SAMPLE

1 NO

I4<fl

I

I

%

^

I

vA

v/A

/

ROD%REC

BLOWSFOOT

17

100

41

86

32

34

49

42

DESCRIPTIONDense to very dense, moist, red-brown, siltySAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM)

Dense, moist, yellow-brown, silty fineSAIfD (SM)

Dense, moist, red, brown, tan, black,silty fine SAND (SM)

Decomposed

gray,

Bedrock

we%

\R

LL%

0

PL«

32

ucsUf

30

DRYDENpel

| LOG OF BORING 9FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAV/N LANDFILL

, DRAWN BY: MWK (CHECKED BY: VMB PROJECT NO: 8 1 C80 1 7 A DATE: 3Feb'82 FIGURE NO: A-5


LOCATKKEY TOSURFAC

EPTH

-

-

-TW """""

•0-

-

_

so—

-

65—

70-

.'5—

jo-

u

SAMPLE!

A

S

1

X

I

I

IN See Firure ? DATE DRILLED PS .TnnnnY-y 10,82BORING LOGE ELEVATIONROD%REC

.-

BLOWSFOOT

35

36

46

23

36

47

58

s' See Figure A-2 WATER LEVEL s** Ta>,i o ?M70.2' DATE ME

DESCRIPTIONASURED (

Dense, moist, red, brown, tan, black, gray,silty fine SAND (SM)

Decomposed Bedrock

Medium dense to dense, moist, yellow-brown,silty fine SAND (SM)

Decomposed Bedrock

Dense to very dense, tan, black, white,red silty fine SAND (SM)

Decomposed Bedrock


we

fl

LL

\\

PL

30

ucstsf

-°

DRYDENpcf

I

LOG OF BORING 9 (CONTINUED)FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAV/N LANDFILL

DRAWNBY;MWK CHECKED BY: VMS PROJECT NO: 81C8017A DATE:3Feb'82 [FIGURE NO: A-5


ff '

i

II '

1f

•$..•fe' ,*»"

• r'**'

XH

S&

IH•«v;

W-

————=

——=SI S

•J....—

-•

•

• *"•'•'.'

r- i. A'. • •.•*<i '. •: , j•' '* V

•'• r'.

-~ -

lii|

State Permit No. CE-81-O2OO

' Elevation of too of riser pipe 471.61*

Ground elevation 1+70 ?

t I.D. Of surface casing 4-inch ^Type of surface casing STEELPIPS WITH LOCKING CA?

I.D. Of riser pipe 2-inc,hTyp* P* rfs«r p'p«» pvc

L Diameter of borehole U-inch

Type of backfill CEMENT-BENTONITEGROUT

< Type of seal . BEKTOBITEDepth of top of seal 61 FT

^ ———— Depth of top of sand pack ———— 63_EI ——

—————— Depth Of top «* screen 65 FT .Type of screened section 0.015-inchslot PVC


Depth of bottom of well 75 FTHo nth nf hrtlo 75 FT

ARI00202|| REPORT OF MONITORING WELL 9

FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILLDRAWNBY:MWK CHECKED BY VMS PROJECT NO: 81C8017A DATE: 9Feb'82 FIGURE NO: A-6

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTSCOf.'SULTlH3 ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENViRCJA'.ENTM. SCIENTISTS

IIIIIII1fln.nn

n.1

LOCATKKEY TOSURFAC

DEPTH

-

5 —

10 —

15 —

20—

25—

30—

35--

40-

UlSA

MPLE

X

y

I

I

E

X«M

K

v /

UN See Fifure 2 O&TFOP'LLED 22, -25 Januarv 108?BORING LOGE ELEVATIONROD%REC

BLOWSFOOT

21

35

62

38

lU

51

«,,32

e See Figure A-2 WATER LEVEL See Table 2467.2' DATE MEASURED

DESCRIPTIONModerately compacted, damp to moist, brown,gray, black silty SAND (SM) with gravel andtrash - FILL

Dense to very dense, moist, red-brown siltySAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM)

Stiff moist, red and gray, clayey SILT (ML)

•

Dense to very dense, damp, red, gray, black,tan fine sandy SILT (ML)

Decomposed Bedrock

... becomes silty, fine SAND (SM)

A

— —we

11

us

LL

00

033

PL

20

BMMMI

ucst«f

3LOG OF BORING 10

pefT

1

P-

FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILLDRAWNBY:MWK CHECKED BY: VMB PROJECT NO: 81C8017A DATE: 3Feb'82 FIGURE NO: A-7n WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS

LOCATIKEY TO

^M IIOCA r

)EPTH

1

™

45-

50-

55—

P:'60—65—

-

70 —

f c* o —

1:

Ul

»..

Uf

1II

I

1I

E

E39

ON See Fifrure ? DATE DRILLED 22-21? ,1BORING LOGS See Fieure A-2 WATER

ranua^v 1Q8?LEVEL See Table 2

E ELEVATION 467.2' DATE MEASUREDROD%REC

BLOWSFOOT

Ul

30

U8

70

»,,

81

50/.4'

50/.2'

DESCRIPTIONDense to very dense, damp, red, gray, black,tan, silty, fine SAND (SM)

Decomposed Bedrock


we LL PL

10

ucsttf

)20

DRYDENpel

k

LOG OF BORING 10 (CONTINUED)FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILL

DRAWN BY: MWK CHECKED BY: VMB PROJECT NO: 8 1 C80 1 7 A DATE: 3Feb'82 FIGURE NO: A-7

wnnnwARn.r.iYDF CONSULTANTS

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTx-» 7

Date Roport*d 2/ S/'32Date SuLir.i !:!•:•<•] ."•/ 3/E2Dn-c.3rL3 Ll-iiU.' £Yl£/32

Woodward-C 1 -dt1 Consul tints r3. G. No.

Woodlaum landfill nor.i taring well # 10Sample collected 2/2/S2 1455 by LLI.WCC


Arsenic :'. O.OO2 mg/1 245-4Q-O1800Barium < 0.1 mg/1 P.46-40-0120O-JCadmium s 0.001 mg/1 249-40-01000Chron-dum 0.01 ing/I 2S1-4Q-01QQOLead < 0.01 mg/1 255-40-010OO'.jMercury < 0.001 mg/1 E59-40-02000Selenium < 0.002 mg/i 264--40-O2000Silver < 0.005 ing/I E66-40-01OOQ1Vinyl chloride < 1. ppb 999-70-O5OOOJBenrene 3. ppb 999-70-OSOOOToluene 3160. ppb 999-70-O0500*

Well #10 I.D. CE-S1-Q2Q1 West side of Cell A _ ——*Well purged by Vydas Brizgys and Mark Gallagher of 7 liters* £/ci/S2 AMusing a stainless/teflon bailer. Sample cc-llected by LLI, 1.5 feetabove well bottom using a 2" Ketntnerer sampler* 2/2/82 14:55 afterrecharge. Static u.i;iter level at time of sair.pliny: 6fi' 0" beloutap of 5" PVC casing.

1The groundiuater sample was vacuum filtered through a O.45 micronmembrane? filter 2/E/S2 18:00 immediately on receipt at the laboratory*acidified with Ultrex nitric: acid* and refrigerated. The above metalsanalyses tuere performed on this filtered sample.Three baked, teflon-sealed vials were filled without headspace on site?these samples mere u-ned for volatile organics analysis.

PVC casing top 468.84' MSLSWL 403.84' MSL2 COPIES:. TO Woodward-Clyde? Consultants Attn: Vydas Brizgvs2 COPIES TO Firestone Tire &. Rubber Co. Attn: George 5. MarUfert

ARI00205

INV TO- Woodward-Clvue Consul tan 215. DO 1154 Respectfully -;.".-* >ITU t ted« ~.,. L n c 3 7: t c-? i Lei L >.:• r- :• t c.) r -;. es * In c:*£§&- MAIN LABORATORY:

.nlttJJ--' 242S New Holland Pike, Lancaster, Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301<JlL/? FRANKLIN DIVISION:

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT' Lancaster Laboratories.. ,,,.,<„ -M• Dole Ri"f!«..:r t...ci •?/ F/r-s

Date Submit :/:?d .?,' 3/92

d&" Consul tcants . P. 0. No.

Wood 1 s-ujn ' 1 a n d f ill man 1 1 a r i n g we 1 i tt 7Sample i.ol Icctad 2/2/82 1.505 by LLI/WCC


Arsenic < 0.002 mg/i 245-4O-O1SOOBarium < 0.1 mg/1 E46-4O-O12OOCadmium < 0.001 my /I 249-40-O1OOGChromiumLeadMercury

O.O1 mg/i 251-40-O1OOO0.01 mg/1 255-40-01OOO:!O.001 mg/1 259-40-0200O

Selenium < O.OQ2 mg/1 264-40-02OOOSilver < O.O05 mg/1 S66-40-010OOVinyl chloride- < 1. ppb 999-70-05OOOBenzene 4. ppb 999-7O-05OOOToluene 4250. ppb 799-70-OO5QO

..

ell #9 I.D. CE-Sl-OEOO North side of Cell A11 purged by Vydas Brisgys and Mark Gallagher of 3 liters. 2/2/82 AM

using a stainless/teflon bailer. Sample collected by LLI, 1.5 feetabove well bottom using a S" Kemmerer sampler, 2/2/82 15:05 afterrecharge. Static a<-j let level at time of sampling: 67' 9.5" bolowtop of 2" PVC casing.

The groundwater sample was vacuum filtered through a O.45 micronmembrane filter 5/2/32 18:00 immediately on receipt at the laboratory*acidified with Ultrex r-iitric acid? and refrigerated. The above metalsanalyses were performed on this filtered sample.Three baked, teflon-sealed vials were filled without headspace on site,these samples were usesd for volatile organics analysis.

PVC casing top 471.64' MSLSWL 403.84' MSL2 COPIES TO Woodmard-Clyde Consultants Attn: Vydas, Erizq>s2 COPIES TO Firestcnc Tire & Rubber Co. Attn: George B. Markert

ARI00206'V TO- Woodward-Clyde Consultan 255.00 31r34 Resp€»ctfu 1 3. y submitted

£v MAIN LABORATORY:rM\ 2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301/-* FRANKLIN DIVISION:

i7/5--." P.O. Box 467, 5424 Buchanan Trail East

Lancasier LcjL'or

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT"Lancaster Laboratories*. ,.,,„,,, Ll

Da to P.C!p'.;:'t>.-J 2 •' Sj/bDate- Bubn,., -t \.:>!.\ "d.' 3/BDiscard Da l« £.' l^/L'

Wood ward-Clyde- Consultants P. 0. No.

Woodlawn landfill monitoring u»eil S E-Sample collected 2/2/82 1445 b/ LLI, UiCC


Arsenic < 0.002 mg/1 245-4O-O180OBarium < O.I mg/1 246-40-O120O'Cadmium < 0.001 mg/1 249-40-O1OOOChromium 0.01 mg/1 251-40-O1OQOLead ' < 0.01 mg/1 255--4O-G1OOC'Mercury < Q.001 mg/1 259-40-O20OO.Selenium < 0.002 mg/1 264-4Q-O2QOOSilver < O.005 mg/1 266-4O-Q1OOOVin.l chloride < 1. ppb 999-7O-O5OOOBens^ne 2. ppb 999-70-O5OOOToluene 2000. ppb 999-70-OO50O-

Well #3 I.D. CE-31-0199 East side of Cell A .Well purged by Vydas Brizgys and hark Gallagher of 2.75 liters, 2/2/82 AMusing a stainless/teflon bailer. Sample collected by LLI, 1.5 feetabove well bottom using a 2" Kemmerer sampler, 2/2/82 14:45 afterrecharge. Static water level at time of Sampling: 70' 0" belowtop of 2" PVC casing.

The groundwater sample was vacuum filtered through a O.45 micronmembrane filter 2/2/82 18:00 immediately on receipt at the laboratory,acidified with Ultrox nitric acid, and refrigerated. The above metalsanalyses were performed on this filtered sample.Three baked, teflan-sealed vials were filled without headspace on site-;these samples were used for volatile organics analysis.

PVC casing top 473.42' MSLSWL 403.42' MSLE COPIES TO Woodward-Clyde? Consultants Attr,: Vvdas F3ri^:?y~.2 COPIE7S TO Firestone Tire ft. Rubber Co. At tn: George; B. M^rê^t

ARI00207INV TO- Woodward -Cl /de Consul, tan 215.00 115- Respect ful 1 i ---lui-.m). ttod

L n n c: a s t >? r L. A tie- r a t o r i ?..-:;, I n r .MAIN LABORATORY: (~\ 32425 New Holland Pike. Lancaster, Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301 f>v£x.>r- /- 4**< />

,/.-• FRANKLIN DIVISION: JXtpT T 1&UV+P.O. Box 467, 5424 Buchanan Trail East**'* *» w -..« OA <7OCO • /?<^* ^CO fVl**^

f<ppfpJrfr 1

i

i

i

i

1

I

i

i L,; «

State Permit No. CE-8 1-0201

I

1

jr.;

• '"'.•'*.

'$.;'.

V>'

_-_•

W

:

.?#

t~m~mi

^ ^

l ~

-L-""1——_ l-

B•-jJS

====• '

^

•r' *1

1î

i

T' ..,.,. Elevation of top of riser pipe

_ Ground elevation

, I.D. of surface easing l*-inchType of Riirfar* easing STEELPIPE WJTII J.OCKING CAP

I.D. of riser pipe 2-i chType of riser pipe PVC

L niameter of borehole U-inc^

Type of backfill CEMENT-BENTONITEGROUT

^ Type °f seal . wjNTQNITEDepth of top of seal

4 ———— '• Depth of top of sand pack

.„,,,._,.., Depth of top of screenType of screened section 0.015-irslot PVC


Death of bottom of wellw t~r j•:* j P* npnth nf hnlp

fc—— ————————————————————————————P REPORT OF MONITORING WELL 10

FIRESTONE CELL A - WOODLAWN LANDFILLJRAWNBYiMWK CHECKED BY. VMB PROJECT NO: 81C8017A DATE: 9F

1*68. QU

1*67.2

60 FT^

65 FTi.

75 FT

75 FT

BRI00208

:eb'82 FIGURE NO: A-8WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS

CONSULTING ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTLancaster Laboratories ,,;-, u.i E™M..- - ,73i&>

Dale Re PC .. p t v»d 2 /' S. E!> / 82D;ate ?."»ub7Ti.i • loci c-' / i 1 / £35

Fires tone Tire & Rubber Co. P. 0. No. nH '+1417

Uoodlaum Landfill Well #6Sample collected 2/11/82 by LLI

ANALYSIS AS RECEIVED ' LAB CODE/

Vinyl chloride < 1. ppb 999-7G-05OQOBenzene 1 . ppb 999-7G-Q50OOToluene 1310. |apb 999-7O-G050Q

Well #6 I.D. CE-S1-0197 S of center of Cell C

Well sampled unthout purging at 0.5 m above ujell bottom using a Kemmerersampler, £/11/82 by LLI. The above analyses tuere performed on samplescollected in three baked, teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon site.

Casing TOP: 437.25' MSLSwL : 4G2,4E' MSL

2 COPIES TO Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. A.ttn: George Markert1 COPY TO CHEM II

ARI00209

TO- Firesxone Tire & Rubber 1O5.OO 393 Respectfully submittedLabi-'rato1 i«s. Inc.

MAIN LABORATORY: i_x r v2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster. Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301 A-CreC'iT t hfiiftFRANKLIN DIVISION:PO Box 467

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT'& Lancaster Laboratories,, , LLI -*«-•* N- •<»>i731-3

Date Reported £/£S/82Date Suijini-i-ted 2/11/82D i s. c: rj r d D -:> t e 3 / 4 / \~-3.

Firestone TIP*? ft Rubber Co. F. 0. No. AH 41417

Wood 1awn Land F i11 We11 #7Sample collected 2/11/82 by LLI

AS RECEIVED LAB CODE

Vinyl chloride < 1. ppb 999-7O-O5OQQBenzene 5. ppb 999-7O-05OOOToluene 1OBO. PPb 999-7O-O050O

We.ll 4+7 I.D. CE-81 SW corner of Cell C

Well -rampled without purging at 0.5 in above well bottom using a Kemmerersampler? £/ll/8£ by LLI. The above ancilyses were performed on samplescollected in three baked, teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon site.

•"•asing Top; 443.89' MSL: 4O2. 7B ' MS-'-L

5 COPIES TO Fire?stane Tire &. Rubber Co. Attn: George Markert1 COPY TO CHEM II

INV TO- Fires ton.:? Tire ;• Rubber 105.00 393 Respectfully cjbmi tted•v- Lancaster L.jbcTatC'pies. i'nc:

, V'AY"' MA'N LABORATORY: J_) r f' Jft-¥i' 2425 New Holland P'ke. Lancaster, Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301 tf CfkziT f n&*

FRANKLIN DIVISION: fl (/P.O. Box 467. 5424 Buchanan Trail Fast /!-•, .1.., ... :- (~ rj

.'

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTLancaster Laboratories. — > ->* <*• '•>•••• ^ --.

F'rjle Report. 1 .";.'2F..-32Di-rt.e !vubmi tt*-. --.1 3,' 11/8,7.I, a1:. card Da ' o ;•{/ /; ,/E.;2

Firestone Tire- £ Rubber Co. F'. u. Nu . AH 4 In- 17

Wood lawn Landfill Well 4*8Sample collected 2/11/B2 by LLI


Vinyl chloride < 'l. ppb 999-70-05OOOBenzene 1 . ppb 999-70-050GOToluene . 1390. PPfa 999-70-00500

Well #8 I.D. CE-S1-0199 East side of Cell A

Well sampled without purging at 0.5 m above mell bottom using a Kemmerersampler^ 2/11/82 by LLI. The above analyses were performed on samplescollected in three baked, teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon site.

Casing Top: 473.42' MEL3WL : 403.92' MSL

2 COPIES TO Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. At tn : George Markert1 COPY TO CHEM II

ftR!002ll

INV TO- Fires tone- Tire & Rubber 1G5.OO 393 Respect f u 1 ] y submittedLancaster Laboi a tor ies-» Inc.

J3E&S MAIN LABORATORY:vbf\}V 2425 New Holland Pike. Lancaster. Pa. 17601 • (717) 656-2301,«»l J}. FRANKL/N DIVISION.

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTi> Lancaster Laboratories... .„..„..,„ I..I..I Snuip.li--1 No WW 17

Date Reported S/25/SS ]Date Submit-ted 5/11/82Discard D;,rte 3/ 4/82

Firestone Tire &. Rubber CD. P. Q. No. AH 41417

Woodlaum Landfill We1, i #<•/Sample collected 2/ll/t/'ci by L.LI


Vinyl chloride < i. ppb 999-7O-O5OOOBenzene " 4. ppb 999-70-OSOOOToluene 3650. ppb 999-70-OO50O

Well #9 I.D. CE-S1-O2GO North side of Cell A

Well sampled without purging at O.5 m above well bottom using a Kemmerersampler, 2/11/62 by LLI. The- above analyses were performed on samplescollected in three baked, teflon-sealed vials filled without headspaceon site.

Top: 471.64' MSL: 403.68' MSL

S COPIES TO Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Attn: George Markart1 COPY TO CHEM II

ARIQ02I2

INV TO- Firestone Tire S- Rubl.or 105.00 393 Respectfully submittedLancaster Laboratories, Inc.

MAIN LABORATORY:/MVs 2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster. Pa. 17601 • (?17) 056-2301jfe FRANKLIN DIVISION:

:?l'/:JO- i'7 "S - •/ - •> Y

LABORATORY ANALYSIS Rff>ORT> loafer Afonaorw .

• ' Date Reported 2/E5/82r, , , r: ' e bu orn i t '*-eel ? / T i /n -.Jirestone Tire d Rubber Co. Discard Date v*^LI--, -i P' °' No- AH 4141^ ' °CWoodlawn Landfill Well #10Sample collected 2/U/82 by LLI

ALYSISAS RECEIVED

nyl chloride x ' LAB CODEnsene . '" * • ppb-luene 2. ppb "9-70-O5OOO

2620. ppb 999-70-05000999-70-O050O

I-D. CE-Sl-OPrn ,,_...ide of Cell A

1 sampled without purging at ompler, 2/11/RP hv M T ?,. m-»-- »-

TOP: 468.84' MSL: 403.84' MSL

Attni.vtti

I>•>•".*-

" 11P-* ""«*«"• '0 -00 3,3 aespectFuny sub|n;tMAIN LABORATORY- Mncastnr L .ilir-,,. f,.,, •"" "*rrrr- ~. * -. „,, EK.2M, ft f - y- -i- »- •

*

f

WOODLAWN LANDFILL

SUBSURFACE SOILand

WATER EVALUATION

HA82009

J

J 'j RECEIVED

April, 1982

rr--•>:•? 5"r/v''v\' .-'i-.. V '.yJ_yk

APPENDIX G

iiiL

ARI002I5I

HARDIN ASSOCIATES, INCConsulting Engineers

POST OFFICE BOX 163' SOILS EXPLORATION ASSOCIATESGOVERNOR RITCHIE HIGHWAY MATERIALS TESTING _____PASADENA. MARYLAND 21122 - CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION JACK HARDIN

(301) 647-0400 THOMAS L. BROWN

April 13, 1982

Cecil CountyDepartment of Public WorksCourthouse Room 308Elkton, Maryland 21921

Attention: Barry G. Belford, Director

Re: Woodlawn LandfillSubsurface Soil andWater EvaluationOur Number HA82009

Gentlemen:

In accordance with our proposal of January 4, 1982 and recommendations ofMr. Pittman in the Environmental Health Administration, we completed seven (7)standard penetration test borings and installed five (5) observation wells onthe referenced site. The location of test borings and observation wells areshown on Plate Number 1. The locations and elevations shown on Plate Number 1were furnished at our request by the Pelsa Company, 115 East Main Street, Elkton,Maryland 21921.

Locations designated OW-1 through OW-4 were drilled and sampled to a depthof 10 feet below the elevation at which water was encountered with the exceptionof OW-4 where hard rock was encountered before water. OW-4 was originallyplanned as a 4-inch observation well, but was changed to a 2-inch observationwell since no water was encountered during drilling.

After completion of the sampling, a 2-inch diameter PVC screen and riser pipewere installed to the bottom of the hole to allow long term observation of thewater level. The elevation at which water was encountered during drilling wasrecorded at completion and at 24 to 48 hours after completion.

! Ti Locations TB-1 and TB-2 were drilled through the existing landfill to deter-i mine the depth and character of the fill and the type of soils below the fill.

At the.suggestion of Mr. Pittman, observation wells were not installed throughthe existing landfill to allow long term observation of water levels. TB-1 wasdrilled to a depth of 10 feet below the elevation at which water was encountered,

"R100216

Woodlawn Landfill-Soil/Water Evaluation-Page 2-

but TB-2 was terminated on rock at 52.0 feet. Water was encountered in thisboring at 51.0 feet.

Location SW-1 was drilled and sampled to rock at 44.5 feet. Water was en-countered at a depth of 29.0 feet and a 4-inch diameter well was installed toa depth of 39.0 feet.

SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The subsurface soil conditions are summarized on two profiles along linesA-A and B-B as shown on Plate Number 1. The profiles are shown on Plates 3 and4. A summary of the subsurface water levels is shown on Plate Number 2.

Based on the results of seven test borings, the site contains from 15 to 20feet of miscellaneous debris fill. Since only two test borings penetrated thefill, the general or typical characteristic of the fill was not determined. Attwo locations the fill did not contain free water, no apparent chemicals wereencountered, no unusual odor or fumes were observed. Below the fill to approx-imately elevation 380 is a residual soil or weathered rock. The distinctionbetween residual soil and weathered rock is the standard penetration resistancewith blows greater than 100 blows/foot typically used to designate weatheredrock. Laboratory tests on representative samples indicate that both the resid-ual soils and weathered rock are silty very fine sands to sandy silts. Augerrefusal indicating relatively sound rock was encountered at three locations;TB-2, OW-4 and SW-1 at elevations 370 to 380.

Based on the results of five observation well readings on April 3, 1982,approximately one month after completion, the ground water flow is northeast tosouthwest below the site. From these data a preliminary groundwater contour maphas been constructed as shown on Plate 2. We have proposed that the study under-way for Firestone be available for our review. The data obtained from the Fire-stone study should be used to test and further define the groundwater profile inthe northeast portion of the site.

WATER QUALITY

As of this date, analysis of water samples from the observation wells havenot been completed. Sampling by Gascoyne Laboratories and the EnvironmentalHealth Administration are planned for April 14, 1982. We anticipate results fromGascoyne Laboratories will be available on April 21, 1982. The results will besubmitted as an addendum to this report as they become available. Another sampl-ing will be scheduled on/or about May 15, 1982.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

From the results obtained from this study to date, we can draw the followingconclusions in response to the order number C-0-82-083 issued by the Office of

fiRI00217

Woodlawn Landfill/Soil/Water Evaluation-Page 3-

Environmental Programs dated December 10, 1981.

1. We have concluded that groundwater flows from northeast to south-west beneath the Woodlawn Disposal Site. The maximum groundwaterelevation is estimated to be 410 at the northeast corner of thesite and about elevation 370 at the southwest corner of the site.

2. We have concluded that the bottom of the landfill material is atabout elevation 430 in the northeast section of the site and atabout elevation 415 in the southwest section of the site. We havetherefore concluded that the bottom of the fill is separated fromgroundwater by a minimum of 20 feet of medium dense residual soilor very dense weathered rock. We have estimated from grain sizecharacteristics and density of the material between the bottom ofthe landfill and the water table that the material has an averagevertical permeability not greater than IO"6 cm/sec (1 foot/year).

3. From consideration of the lack of free water encountered in thelandfill, the relatively low permeability of the residual soil orweathered rock below the landfill, the low moisture content of thesoil below the landfill and the depth of the groundwater below thebottom of the landfill, we have concluded that the possibility ofgroundwater contamination on this site is remote.

4. We recommend that the results of chemical analysis from the April15 and May 15, 1982 sampling be evaluated to determine if additionalinvestigation is required. On/or about June 1, 1982 we recommend ameeting with the Environmental Health Administration to review theavailable data from this study and the Firestone study.For long-term monitoring we recommend another well in the vicinityof our OW-3 to be extended to elevation 350 or to rock whichever ishigher and a well between our OW-4 and our SW-1. The location ofthe well between OW-4 and SW-1 will have to be determined by trialborings to find a location where groundwater is encountered at least10 feet above rock.

We are available to discuss our findings with you and the Environmental HealthAdministration. We request that you furnish any data which becomes available fromthe Firestone study and we grant permission to furnish our data to the Firestonestudy.

Very truly yours,HARDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.

Hardin, P. E.

JH/mt y

HARDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.Soils and Foundation fngineers

RECORD OF SOIL EXPLORATION

C*M'*C'«4 VIPr»j»er»N^n

Surf. -!•«. _0«t* $••"•-

447.53/2/82

Cecil CountvWood lawn T-anrlfiTI

Cecil Counts Marvland ————————————SAMPLER

Ft. H_**->-' !«•-- 30 i-. Rack Cor. P.- *""

»;„-<:.- 2 '- »...._!_..._. HSA

Boring •Jok .

OW-1HA82009

Sheet 1 of 2

willey__3/2/82

*-

w —••M

••••

k-i _ ___ .

•MM

••••

^

——

^mm

fc» ' ^MV

^ ~

ta __

- IH —

"••

n

-*

429.5

Colrx.MoiMuf*. Owtiiy. PlMtieiix. SiztProportion*

Pink and red, moist,medium stiff to verystiff SILT with someclay, little finesand

-

Red, brown with blacklenses, moist, verystiff to medium stiffSILT with little clay,trace fine sand andmica

oe~r>

18.0


• I

5 -J ——• I

10-J ——• I

isJ-

20-J ——• I

a7

t• i40

Blo~»/_"

2-3-3

9-7-8

7-9-11

7-10-10

5-6-10

5-7-13

3-5-8

4-4-6

No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Trp.

OS

OS

OS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

R.c

5

3

6

6

18

18

12

12

•OMINC « SAMPLINGNOTES

6" TOPSOILat surface

*Caved at 53.0***Caved at 48.5'

ARI002I9 —— l.AMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WA T£ R DEPTH BORING METHOD

|.|NT_CT _«TC- ———————— f-».————————.FToe

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST-DRIVINC 2" OD SAMOUE« .• w.T- i_O- -AMMER PA^L.NG 3O" COUNT MADE AT 6"9 *

HARDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.Soils and Foundation Engineers


e...i *!_„ 447.5, 3/2/R3

Q*t+ '••**•• J/ * / ° —

uecii. countyWoodlawn T.and-1Cecil Countv.

SAMPLERH*«*m-r *»..

Ft. H«mm*r Un»l

fillMary land ———————————————————

140 L_.. H.I. D. —— ... 8"

r,__Q '«• R-e(l c— n—

___ Baring •Jofc.

F_,.--»

___ Imped*'

HAS 200 9Sheet 2 of 2

M. Willey. —

.1... 3/2/82

—_—.—

————•MM)

•m**

••••••I

•v

•—— «

•••_

••"•B

••_

ELEV.

391.0

XHL DESCRIPTIONC*l«r.M*i*tur«. Owicity. Plasticity. Six*

Brown and black, verymoist very stiff tohard SILT, trace micaand sand

Bottom of test holeat 56. 51

STRAOEPTV

56.5

DEPTHSCALE

SAMPLECond

• I

45-J ——• I

• I50-J ——• I

Jl• I

60 ——

-

—

•l*wi/_"

5-6-10

7-9-10

6-11-12

9-16-17

8-10-11

7-7-40

N*.

9

10

11

12

13

14

T,M

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

R.c

10

18

6

6

14

8

•ORING* SAMPLINGNOTCS

Water encounteredat 44. 51

Water sample flobtained insideaugers at completion

•[

*Caved at 53.0***Caved at 48.5'ftR!00220

yyi SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORING METHOD

»T r »t,T.».. 47.0* rrO» • OKI V CM »»_IT S»OON O . OIllNTtCK* TED " M»A . HOUUOW STCM AuCC MSPT - VMCSSCO »M«C-Y TUBB I- INTACT >---• ^-» rT cf A . CONTINUOUS FUIOMTCA • COMTINUOU* r_ICMT -ueCH U . UNOIITU-BCO »FTC" j^ _,„, 47 .0**, OC • DKIVIMC CA»INC"C • nocx co«e u . _O»T —~"—™"~ MO • MUD OHILUINC

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST.DRIVING 2" OD SAMPLER 1' WITH J40» HAMMER FALLING 30"; COUNT MADE AT 6" INTERVALS

HABDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.Soils and Foundation Engineers


»...i FI.. 434.1r... «.-.,._ 3/2/82

Cecil CountyWoodlawn LandfillCecil County, Maryland

SAMPLERH_<~-~. w. 140

Ft. HWMMM Uro» °Pi.. *s._ 2

_L.».__u.

In.

Hol« Oi«-l*t»r__

R*ek C»r, D'«_

8"~

HSA

.„„_.., B«""9 • OW-2J«. . HA82009

Sheet 1 of

?_.-«,_« M. Willey

2

TI* ""1 —

f—f .— •

r -••Br :

A=~-r^r ='r~i ——

'(• ~

j """

k I

L-:1 -

ELEV.

433.1• I\l_

416.1

•SOIL DESCRIPTIONColor.Moi.Wro. Oon*ltX. PIlMiCitX. Six*

P«ap*rtion«

Brown, moist, loos*fine to coarse SANDand GRAVEL with somesiltOrange-brown, moist,stiff to very stifffine sandy SILT,trace mica

Brown, moist, verystiff to hard SILTwith little sand,trace mica and finerock fragments

STRADEPTH

1.0

18.0


*T

5-. ——I

10-, ——I

15-. ——I

20--| ——I

25-. ——I

30— |I

35-.I

40

•lows/ ft"

3-4-4

4-6-9

9-13-15

7-11-12

7-11-12

9-16-20

10-17-20

10-12-27

No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Typo

OS

DS

OS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

Roe

3

6

5

5

5

8

8

4

SORING ft SAMPLINGNOTES

48vU)02£l-SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORING METHOD

STANDARD PENET«_T,ON TEST.ORIX/.NG r« OO SAMPLER ,' W.TH I.O. HAMMER FALLING JO": COUNT MADE AT 6" .NTERVALS

J HflHDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.Soils and Foundation Engineers


C«nt,ocM>4 Wit

•

Surf. Elo-

k --

._

434.13/2/82

cecii countyWoodlawn LandfillCecil County,SAMPLER

j ^ ^ Wt

__ Ft. Hommor Urop_J

Maryland

*0 t552

In.In.

Hal,RockBorin

8"Oi ••«-»-•.__.._Cor

HSA

OW-2HA82009

Sheet 2 of

M. Willey—

,!_.__ 3/2/82

r2

ELEV.

363.9

SOIL DESCRIPTIONColor.Moiswro. Dmstly. PI-Mlcity, Sixo

Proportions

Brown, moist, hardfine sandy SILT,trace rock fragments

(decomposed)

Bottom of test holeat 70.2'

STRADEPTV

70.2

DEPTHSCALE

1 SAMPLECon«

m i

45-J ——a i

50-J ——• I

55 — •• ———

«

-

60-1

•*«

•

•

_

70~»

__,

———

75 —

I

I

I

I

___

I

•lows /ft"

30-j>l3"

40-513"

6-16-513

17-516"

512"51lr

517*

511"

512"

No.

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Typo

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

Roc

8

8

10

6

2

1

3

1

2

SORING & SAMPLINGNOTES

Hard auger ingfrom 52. O1 to 70.0'

Water encounteredat 59.0'

Water sample flobtained from insideaugers at completionof boring.Note; only 6" of ^water in augers aURcompletion

Hole caved atcompletion at 67.0'

Water sample 12obtained afteraugers pulled out ofhole.

wnu««L^

jjj

JJd

SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORING METHOD• T go^»LgTio»j 57.0

0» . D-IVCN S-LIT SPOON O • OISINTCCW A TCO 48 46 . 0 —— ' «SA . HOLLOW STEM AUCCKl-T . nncsico SHCL-V TUOC |. INTACT AFTC-. ————— r-ns... ———— rr crA . CONTINUOUS LIOHT AUCC-»c* . CONTINUOUS FLIGHT Aosen u . UNDIITU--EO »rTe- i. _*• 47.0*_, oc • oniviNC CASING•c.-ocKCone C.LOST *rTe" a* M<" ————— " MO . MUD O-..-.NC

b HARDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.Soils and Foundation Engineers

, RECORD OF SOIL EXPLORATION

..... PU. 394.2. •* /e /QO

D*t+ St***--™ _________ '** -

• Cecil CountyWoodlawn Landfill

Bering •

,„,.. ,•»•!« -Cecil County, MarylandSAMPLER

H.m».r W,. 140 L»».pit

Hal* Q._m.t«»____ °Rack C_r. Oi-*.,.., M..k.J , HSA

__ Intpoctorn... Cf-i

OW-3HAS 200 9

Sheet 1 of 1

M. Willey—

.1... 3/5/8?

«*•••

••H

•••

VOW

••••B

••01

———— _——— .

—————

—————————

_____

•••••••

——

———

——

————

——

ELEV.

383.2

370.2

SOIL DESCRIPTIONCelor.MoiKuro. Don Hey. PlMtieity. Sito

Proportions

Brown, moist, softto hard clayey SILT,trace rock fragments

Green, dry, hard SILT,trace sand, mica androck fragments

(decomposed rock)

Auger refusal at 24.0'

STRAOEP1>

11.0

24.0

DEPTHSCALE

SAMPLEGood

I °

54rT

10-1

•15 —•-Oi

20 ——•

•i25 ——

-

30 —

-

I

I H**«

•HM BH

L

mmm^—m

L

•^•••i

L

i«i«a n

L

Blows/ft"

2-1-2

10-13-12

7-17-511"

512"

510

510"51o-

51

No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Typo

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

Roc

6

4

12

2

0

0

0

0

/

•ORING & SAMPLINGNOTES

Water encounteredat 13.0'

Hard augering from11.0' to 24.0'

RI00223

f-

k SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORING METHOD»T ****** ma.. DRY rr

O* • OOIVCN SPLIT »— OON O • OISINTC.n.TEO Hf A • HOLLOW STCU AU6CK*»T . PHCSSCO SHILOV Tu-C i-INTACT -rTcn__—_r«-*______'••' cr» . CONTINUOUS FLICHT AUCCHSCA . CONTINUOUS FLICMT AUCCM u • UNOISTUHOCO -FTEO i« «a» ____ r oe ' OWIVINC CASINCnc • nocH cone L • LOST '"" uo • MUO OMILLINC

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST.DRIVING 2" OO SAMPLER 1* WITH I «0» HAMMER FALLING 3O"; COUNT MADE AT 6" INTERVAt

Ij HABDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.I Soils and Foundation Engineers

RECORD OF SOIL EXPLORATIONI ______Cecil County _________________Bo,,__. OW-4

i -*""*.!!*.i—~ Woodlawn Landfill J-w. HA82pogI . j. ..__________Cacil County; Maryland————————————————————————Sheet 1 of

SAMPLER^ —— Hon«%., Wt._i____L.». H.I. D.--..... 8______ P-,--.-» M. Willey

I ||. 415.6 Ft. Hom-or u.-P 30 <„. R.ek Cor. Dio————— "" ln»p.etorOoM) Stort _3 itS2— —.—.— *;r*- *'-- — *"• >—»._f t-_«k_d p_t»

—

——

—____

—

—

••>•

•MB

•MB

•«•

•Vl

ELEV.

406.6

378.6

SOIL DESCRIPTIONCo1or.Moioi.ro. OonMty. PtooUemr. Sizo

Proportions

Brown, moist to dryloose to medium dense.fine to coarse SANDand GRAVEL, trace clay

Brown to green, dryto moist stiff tohard fine sandy SILTtrace mica and rockfragments

(decomposed rock)

Auger refusal at 37.0*

STRAOEPT>

9.0

J7.0

DEPTH SAMPLESCALEl Cond

• D

]5-J ——I D

10 j I

15-J ——I D

20-J ——

13 VI35-J ——

J L

40 "1

•I0<"*/ft"

2-3-3

5-9-14

6-5-8

LO-11-15

10-51

516"

51

511"510"

No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Typo

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

Roc

4

10

5

5

4

5

4

1

0

•H

•ORING «, SAMPLINGNOTES

No water encountered

Hard drilling from18.0' to 37.0*

•

*Caved at 35.0'**Caved at 35.0'

• I f i l l ' J J I

AT -»^»1 • TIQig DRY rT • ' ^ Ik)OS • OMIVCN S»LIT SPOON O - OISINTE6NATEO ————_—————__ Ml A • HOLLOW ST CM ' ~ ~ ~ ^»T - VHCS1CO SHCLOV TUOC I-INTACT ArTEM, H*S.. . ,rT c r A . CONTINUOUS "LICHTCA . CONTINUOUS 'LtCMT AU«CK U • UNOISTunOEO »FTE»» »A -» DRY**< oc • OKIVINC CASING«C - HOCK CO"t _ . LOST M ' MO • MUO O~ILLINO

STANDARD PENETRATION, TEST-DRIVING 2" OO SAMPLER 1* WITH 140* HAMMER FALLING 3O"; COUNT MADE AT 6" INTERV/J

J HARDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.' Soils and Foundation Engineerst RECORD OP SOIL EXPLORATION

f«...• «_„ 414.5

Cecil CountyWoodlawn LandfillCecil Countv. Marvland

SAMPLER

Ft. Hommor »•-• 30Pi.. *:.- 2

,L_1. Hal. Dtmmmlmi °

_ln. Rock Cor. D'O„ i.. *_,.., M..k__ „„.„_ J*SA__III_

SW-1HA82009

Sheet 1 of 2

M. Willey~

_...: 3/4/82

••MM

•m

•OM

^ MM

~

E

_

—

E__—

MM

_

ELEV.

411.5

SOIL DESCRIPTIONCol.r.Moistur*. Oonsity. Plosttcity. Six.

Proportions

Tan , moist , soft•ilty CLAY

Tan to green, dry tomoist very stiff tohard fine sandy SILTwith little rockfragments , trace mica

—

(decomposed rock)

STRAOEPTV

•vn


• I

5 P

10-J ——1 °

15-J ——• D

20-J ——^ D25-J ——

H D

30-J— —J D

3 D

35--J 3 D•• ——- D

40

•lows/ft"

1-2-3

6-7-10

9-12-15

25-51r

516"

51•5"

51T*"

513"

514"

51T'

No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Typo

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

Roc

5

5

5

6

5

5

2

3

2

1

•ORING & SAMPLINGNOTES

2" GRAVELat surface

Hard augering from18.0* to 44.5'

Water encounteredat 29.0*

.

_*££yed at 40.0'A£!4&£2§o'

Jr

J

SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORING METHOD

OS-0-IVENSI.HT S-OON O. DISINTEGRATED »T COM»LETION_A_S—————FT. ^ HOLLOW »TEM AOGE HI»1 - -»C»CD SHEUOV TUOC I. INTACT AFTE« ——————— H"i.——————^FT C FA . CONTINUOUS FLICH T AlCA. CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUCCN u - UNOISTunOEO _rTe« 24 HIM 22,0**r, OC • OHIVING CASING

? «C • -OCK CO»E L . LOST AFTCW *4H***»tV F> _ _ __......MO - MUO OniLLINC

*^t STANOA"° PENETRATION TEST-DRIVING 2" OD SAMPLER I' WITH 1*0. HAMMER FALLING 30"; COUN|IM*Oe AW* INT



fY__. H

,.... ir|_. 414.5QftM St**** J/H/Q^S

Cecil CountyWoodlawn Landfill

_ Baring •

Jok .

Cecil Countv. MarvlandSAMPLER 8"_ LW». H.I. Qi .......

,1. *....,«_...- HSA

___ For.mon.Inspector

sw-i fltHA82009 EW

Sheet 2 of 2

M. Willev—

_,_..; 3/4/82Ii

—

—

—

——

•M

•••

MiM

<*H

«••

WOI

•••Hk

•n

ELEV.

370.0

SOIL DESCRIPTIONColor.MoiK.r.. OOTS«IX. Plosttciiy. Si.o

Green, dry, harddecomposed BOCK

Auger refusal at 44.5*

STRAOEPTh

44.5

OEPTHSCALE

H

—

-

50 —

—

••••*•

•H

*•

•1

OHW^

SAMPLECend

L

••••••M

L

L

•lows/ ft"

51

510"

510"

No.

11

12

13

Typo

DS

DS

DS

Roc

0

0

0

•ORING * SAMPLINGNOTES

Water sample flobtained atcompletion

^

*Caved at 40.0***Caved at 34.0'

H D 1 rv-rvst,** _»SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORING HttwatP, JBb

—

—

-

—

JL

E

—

-

_ 28.0* .OS • OKIVEN SOLIT S»>OON O • DISINTEGRATED HSA • HOLLOW STEM AuCCMS ^"^»T . r>-E*»CO SHELOY TUOC I 'INTACT »rTE«»__ —— "•» FT c FA • CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AU.CnSCA . CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUCEH U . UNOISTUMOCD »rTE» It. ~n« 22. OS? OC • OKIVING CASINGKC . -OCX COME L - LOST " " MO • MUD DRILLING

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST-DRIVING 2" OD SAMPLER »' WiTn («0« HAMMER FALLING M"; COUNT MADE AT ft" INTERVAL1

00226



C.ntr.et.4 WiProioclsNomo

Ooto Stortoo1 _

•-

_

451.43/3/82

Cecil CountvWoodlawn TjindfiLlCecil

Boring *Job.

Countv. MarylandSAMPLER„ ___ . w. 140

Ft. HwMH-r Uroo 30_Lb*.

„„„..'"-

Hoi.RockBormf M.rhod___

ft" -0 F.r.m.n

— — Into.ctor.

TB-1HA82O09

Sheet 1 of

M. Willev—

2

HSA n_i_e_«Pi-"- 3/3/82

f•_-_»

1 «"»™

••««

r-P-P:Jk'1r1

—f If -

f'E» -• — -

1 __te

ELEV.

••• «•

«..

431.9

SOIL DESCRIPTIONCotor.Moistitro. Oonsicy. Plostieity. Sit.

Proportions

Brown, moist, mediumdense to dense , fine 'to coarse GRAVEL withsome fine to coarsesand, little silt(trace wire, bricks.paper , -misce llaneousfill- with sandyclay layer from11.0' to 13.0')

_

Tan, dry, hard finesandy SILT, trace micaand fine rock fragments

STRADEPTH

19.5


• O

5-TfT

10-J ——• D

15-J ——I D

20 J

i°"

35 J _3

40 "j

Blows/ ft"

3-6-7

6-7-14

10-5-2

25-17-15

516fl

516"

14-14-17

51

No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Typo

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

Roc

5

6

4

8

6

6

10

2


Hard augering from19.5* to 70.0'

*Caved at 65.5*|**Caved at 65.0'«R f nnoo--

"""* * w^*l.S»/SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORING METHOD

.» /\ .t rTiftt. D? . U____^TOS - OftlVEN S»LIT SPOON O • DISINTEG«ATED -•-«• -- w ——————————• MS A • HOLLOW ITEM AUGCKS•T . »»E»ED SHELOV TuOE |. INTACT ..»«•- w»t rT c p _ • CON TINUOU* FLIGH T AUCEMSCA . CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGEM u • UNDISTUHOED 57 0** DC • DHIVING CASING"C . MOCM COME L • LOST AFTE" J« M>» -" -^ ri MO . MUO OWILLING

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST-DRIVING 2" OD SAMPLER I' WITH 1«0» HAMMER FALLING 3O": COUNT MADE AT 6" INTERVALS



C.ntroct.J WithPfoj.eliNomo_L.c.ti.n.,

Suit. Elow __

Cecil CountyWbodT.awn Landfill ———————————————————————

. Boring *Jab .

Cecil Countv. Marvland

451.43/3/82

SAMPLERHomm.r Wt. 140

Pi._ *i._ 2

.Lot. Hot. Di.">.».r___ln. Rock Cor« DIO

8"——

HSA

___ F.r.m.n- lnso.ct.r_

TB-1 HHA82009 """•"Sheet 2 of 2

M. Willey—3/3/82

*—MM-

__

——

—

——

__

—

•>•>

•MB

OMM^

•••

• K

•MB

•

**~**m

m*m

HB

«<M

EL6V.

381.2

SOIL DESCRIPTIONColor.Moiotero. Donslty. Ploscieity. Six.

Proportions

Tan and white, dry tomoist, hard finesandy SILT with somemica and rock fragments

(decomposed)

Bottom of test holeat 70.2'

STRADEPTV

70.2

DEPTHi50-J-

55-J

60-J

1/u H75 ——

—

—

~

SAMPLECond

~D~

D

D

D

D

~D"

D

•IHM BM

D

L

•lows/ft"

51•gtr

51m \\6

51

515"

51

51

51

512"512"

No.

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Typo

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

DS

R.c

i

>

4

5

1

2

2

2

0

A


Water encounteredat 60.0' [

„.

Water sample #1taken at completionof boring

Backfilled boring

31.0' to 65.0*Bentonite and cuttings

16.0' to 31. 01 JBIpure bentonite

0' to 31.0' cuttings

,

COCNJCNJO

!l_cc:

*Caved at 65.5''pjTfT o65*01SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE CONDITIONS GROUND WATER DEPTH BORINC

59.0* rTDS • DRIVEN SPLIT SPOON O . OISINTECd. TEO . . - Ml* • HOLLOW STEM AUCEHS»T . -nCSSEO SHELOV TUOE |. INTACT *»TC- •*•« _" T C FA . CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUCEH'CA . CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER u • UNOISTunOED _.__ .. _. C.1 n** DC • DMIVING CASING"C-noC-CO-E L-LOST »FTC- 2« --» _iL*U_? 1 «O • MUD O-ILLING

STANDARD PENETRATION TEST-DRIVINC 2" OD SAMPLER f WITH 1_0« HAMMER FALLING 3O"; COUNT MADE AT 6" INTERV

oCO

Mt/>V)<CL,

O t^ •«• <N n vo00 ^ O\ CO f** f»

c oo m -rO> ON ON ON

O O Oo o en en oON iH rH O\ O\ H

tao

ta £V) C-3geu M

gHsscrs

uci

IslSB

C N J r - l t N i - l f N f O t N i - H i H

in in in m in m m in m in in m inV O i - 4 i H i H r 4 v ? r H i n r H V D « J i n V O V O i n f HT r c M n ^ r H o j i n . c M f o m . I H C N • rnT i l l i 1 1 ^ 0 1 I I V D I L'-'J.i n o o o o i n o i o in in i m in i o- r c j r n V i H C M i n i n c N r o m i n i - i f N i n i H

CMa CQ _j irt r* i—* rv> \.n, cn

I OO

-I§1O £3O

ARI00229

m ^ , •. \• ,r - , ...

APPENDIX H

ARI00230

"*•&? ' \

APPENDIX I

ARI0023I

I;•••ii•

si

. <o oO (M —

si

J.

a qON) <D''X i

s * l« * ~2i-i "<5 iS "9

. » *** • » « * Q . * . . . — — T"" l

i-j3z8

TES INC

CATION

0 =Jr OO 2TW•2 QZ

Z <Is£i

az2>_s<_0_

ARI00232

- 2

PSf QO i,

<§Z <O V)

ARI00233

7

I'fIIIIIIIIIIIII ARI00235

\

Documents

; wN SCALE: 1: 2OOOf2/2/82 —