1
Paula Thiem, Stephan Ludwig, Alexander Villinger and Wolfram W. Seidel* Synthesis, Basicity and Coordination Chemistry [3] U. Beckmann, D. Süslüyan, P. C. Kunz, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2011, 186, 2061–2070. [4] K. Helmdach, S. Dörk, A. Villinger, W. W. Seidel, Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 11140–11144. [1] A. J. Carty, A. Efraty, Can. J. Chem. 1968, 4, 1598–1599. [2] B. C. Ward, J. L. Templeton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 1532–1538. α-P-Alkyne Complex Ligands INSTITUT FÜR CHEMIE| Universität Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 3a | 18059 Rostock | Germany Seidel Group W C Br N N N B H O H H W C Br N N N B H O P R 2 H W C Br N N N B H O PR 2 PR 2 Electrophilic substitution after coordi- nation of the unsubstituted acetylene allows functionalization whereas the side-on binding mode is maintained. While investigation of P-substituted acetylene compounds is usually restricted to those of bis(diphenyl- phosphino)acetylene (dppa), this synthesis enables variation of the substituents on the phosphorus. Due to stabilizing π- interactions between one phenyl group and the scorpionate ligand, the first substitution step is regioselective with diphenyl- phosphine while synthesis of 2a gives two regioisomers in a ratio of 39 % (H ) syn to 61 % (H ). anti Basicity of the Phosphine Synthetic Approach Introduction Use as Chelating Ligand Alkynes substituted by donor atoms in both α-positions offer the opportunity to combine a redox-active complex moiety with a potentially chelating unit. This makes them valuable building blocks for polynuclear compounds with short metal-metal distances and interesting redox behavior. Coordination of those donor alkynes is possible via the donors or via the triple bond, but the coordination behavior of P-substituted acetylenes is strongly dominated by the phosphorus. Therefore coordination of diphosphinoalkynes to a metal-precursor mostly leads to 1 [1] 2 κ -P-coordination as seen in the example by Carty and Efraty. The η - [2] mode as in the compound published by Templeton is obtained less often. [4] In previous works we prepared polynuclear compounds by coordination of diphosphanes 3 to transition metals as Pt(II) while binding to first row transition metals could not be achieved so far due to a lack of basicity of commonly used 3b. However, the newly investigated, more basic diphosphine 3a is able to coordinate Cu(I) and Ni(II) giving complexes stable in solution. The Ni(II) complex can also be obtained with 3b, though the lower donor strength is reflected in the strongly reduced stability. 1 2 R= iPr (a), Ph (b) [{3a}CuPhen]BF 4 vs. • stable in solution • air stable as solid • dissociation in solution The pK value of phosphines shows a linear correlation with B 31 77 the P- Se-coupling constant of corresponding P-selenides, [3] which is therefore used as an indirect measur. Interestingly, both regioisomers of 2a differ strongly in their basicity, with 2a (H ) even lying in the range of 2b. In the diphosphanes 3 anti both phosphane positions also show a slight difference in this regard. It is known that the substituents of a phosphine strongly affect its basicity. Here, the replacement of phenyl substituents by isopropyl groups leads to an increase of the phosphine basicity by several orders of magnitude. 1 J PSe est. pK B Monophos 2a H syn 701.2 7.3 2a H syn 740.2 12.4 2b 738.5 12.2 Diphos 3a 697.1 691.9 6.7 6.0 3b 769.9 764.7 16.3 14.3 Hydrido-tris(trimethylpyrazolyl)borate 3 R= iPr (a), Ph (b) [{3a}Cu Br]BF 2 4 [{3a}NiCl ] 2 [{3b}NiCl ] 2 61 % 39 % 11 % 89 % W P Ph 2 P Ph 2 S S S S Et 2 N Et 2 N CO Carty and Efraty Templeton The significant difference in basicity between the isomers of 2a is confirmed by methylation of the phosphorus. The inversion of the isomer ratio is based on the more rapid methylation of the H syn isomer and rotation of the alkyne. [{3a}CuPhen]BF 4 [{3a}Cu Br]BF 2 4 3a Cu1-P1 [Å] 2.694(13) 2.282(2) - C2-C1-P1 121.5(4) 135.8(4) 153.9(2) P1-P2 [Å] 3.271 3.834 4.41 1) nBuLi, -80 °C 2) Cl R , rt 2 P 1) nBuLi, -80 °C 2) Cl R , rt 2 P 2a H anti 2a H syn X= Cl, Br, NO 3 P P Cu Cu X X 3 Ph 2 Ph 2 pK = 7.3 B pK = 12.4 B W C Br N N N B H O H P i Pr 2 W C Br N N N B H O P i Pr 2 H DCM, rt, 16 h + W C Br N N N B H O H P i Pr 2 Me BF 4 W C Br N N N B H O P i Pr 2 H Me BF 4 + [Me 3 O][BF 4 ] M M D D M' D D M M' D D N N B N N N N H N N N B H = W C Br N N N B H O PR 2 R' W C Br N N N B H O P R 2 R' toluene, rt Se excess Se R = i Pr, Ph R'= H, PR 2

-P-Alkyne Complex Ligands...Paula Thiem, Stephan Ludwig, Alexander Villinger and Wolfram W. Seidel* Synthesis, Basicity and Coordination Chemistry [3] U. Beckmann, D. Süslüyan, P

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: -P-Alkyne Complex Ligands...Paula Thiem, Stephan Ludwig, Alexander Villinger and Wolfram W. Seidel* Synthesis, Basicity and Coordination Chemistry [3] U. Beckmann, D. Süslüyan, P

Paula Thiem, Stephan Ludwig, Alexander Villinger and Wolfram W. Seidel*

Synthesis, Basicity and Coordination Chemistry

[3] U. Beckmann, D. Süslüyan, P. C. Kunz, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2011, 186, 2061–2070.[4] K. Helmdach, S. Dörk, A. Villinger, W. W. Seidel, Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 11140–11144.

[1] A. J. Carty, A. Efraty, Can. J. Chem. 1968, 4, 1598–1599.[2] B. C. Ward, J. L. Templeton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 1532–1538.

α-P-Alkyne Complex Ligands

INSTITUT FÜR CHEMIE| Universität Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 3a | 18059 Rostock | Germany

Seidel Group

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

H

H

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

PR2

H

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

PR2

PR2

Electrophilic substitution after coordi-nation of the unsubstituted acetylene allows functionalization whereas the side-on binding mode is maintained. While investigation of P-substituted acetylene compounds is usual ly restricted to those of bis(diphenyl-phosphino)acetylene (dppa), this synthesis enables variation of the substituents on the phosphorus.Due to stabi l iz ing π- interact ions between one phenyl group and the scorpionate ligand, the first substitution step is regioselective with diphenyl-phosphine while synthesis of 2a gives two regioisomers in a ratio of 39 % (H ) syn

to 61 % (H ). anti

Basicity of the Phosphine

Synthetic ApproachIntroduction

Use as Chelating Ligand

Alkynes substituted by donor atoms in both α-positions offer the opportunity to combine a redox-active complex moiety with a potentially chelating unit. This makes them valuable building blocks for polynuclear compounds with short metal-metal distances and interesting redox behavior. Coordination of those donor alkynes is possible via the donors or

via the triple bond, but the coordination behavior of P-substituted acetylenes is strongly dominated by the phosphorus. Therefore coordination of diphosphinoalkynes to a metal-precursor mostly leads to

1 [1] 2κ -P-coordination as seen in the example by Carty and Efraty. The η -[2]mode as in the compound published by Templeton is obtained less often.

[4] In previous works we prepared polynuclear compounds by coordination of diphosphanes 3 to transition metals as Pt(II) while binding to first row transition metals could not be achieved so far due to a lack of basicity of commonly used 3b. However, the newly investigated, more basic diphosphine 3a is able to coordinate Cu(I) and Ni(II) giving complexes stable in solution. The Ni(II) complex can also be obtained with 3b, though the lower donor strength is reflected in the strongly reduced stability.

1

2 R= iPr (a), Ph (b)

[{3a}CuPhen]BF4

vs.

• stable in solution • air stable as solid

• dissociation in solution

The pK value of phosphines shows a linear correlation with B31 77the P- Se-coupling constant of corresponding P-selenides,

[3]which is therefore used as an indirect measur. Interestingly, both regioisomers of 2a differ strongly in their basicity, with 2a (H ) even lying in the range of 2b. In the diphosphanes 3 anti

both phosphane positions also show a slight difference in this regard. It is known that the substituents of a phosphine strongly affect its basicity. Here, the replacement of phenyl substituents by isopropyl groups leads to an increase of the phosphine basicity by several orders of magnitude.

1JPSe est. pKB

Monophos 2a Hsyn 701.2 7.3

2a Hsyn 740.2 12.4

2b 738.5 12.2

Diphos 3a 697.1691.9

6.76.0

3b 769.9764.7

16.314.3

Hydrido-tris(trimethylpyrazolyl)borate

3 R= iPr (a), Ph (b)

[{3a}Cu Br]BF2 4

[{3a}NiCl ]2

[{3b}NiCl ]2

61 % 39 % 11 % 89 %

W

PPh2

PPh2S

S

S

S

Et2N

Et2N CO

Carty and Efraty Templeton

The significant difference in basicity between the isomers of 2a is confirmed by methylation of the phosphorus. The inversion of the isomer ratio is based on the more rapid methylation of the H syn

isomer and rotation of the alkyne.

[{3a}CuPhen]BF4 [{3a}Cu Br]BF2 4 3a

Cu1-P1 [Å] 2.694(13) 2.282(2) -

C2-C1-P1 121.5(4) 135.8(4) 153.9(2)

P1-P2 [Å] 3.271 3.834 4.41

1) nBuLi, -80 °C2) Cl R , rt2P

1) nBuLi, -80 °C2) Cl R , rt2P

2a Hanti 2a Hsyn

X=

Cl,

Br,

NO3

P P CuCu XX

3Ph2 Ph2

pK = 7.3BpK = 12.4B

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

H

PiPr2

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

PiPr2

H

DCM,

rt,

16 h

+ W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

H

PiPr2

Me

BF4

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

PiPr2

H

MeBF4

+[Me3O][BF4]

M M

D

D

M' D DM M'

D

D

N

N

B

N

NN

N

H

N

N N

BH

=

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

PR2

R'

W

CBr

N

N N

BH

O

PR2

R'

toluene, rt

Se

excess

Se

R

=

iPr, Ph

R'=

H,

PR2