11
РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ НЕФТИ и Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА ГАЗА OpEx Russia & CIS 2014 «Operational Excellence in Oil, Gas & Petrochemicals » Gubkin Russian State University of oil and gas Technological processes automation department Participants: V. Severenko, A. Krotov, S. Zyev, V. Yuzhanin, R. Barashkin, O. Antipov A. Stepura, A. Chuvilin Simulation unit development for oil&gas industry facilities control algorithms testing

Simulation unit development for oil&gas industry facilities control algorithms testing

  • Upload
    gubkin

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

OpEx Russia & CIS 2014

«Operational Excellence in Oil, Gas & Petrochemicals»

Gubkin Russian State University of oil and gas

Technological processes automation department

Participants: V. Severenko, A. Krotov,

S. Zyev, V. Yuzhanin,

R. Barashkin, O. Antipov

A. Stepura, A. Chuvilin

Simulation unit development for

oil&gas industry facilities control

algorithms testing

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Problem description

Problem:

• Insufficient functional preparation of control system during

implementational works

Consequences:

• Increase of commissioning time

• Increase of accident rate during commissioning, start-up and

exploitation

• Increase of the cost of control system implementing

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Solution

Simulation unit using allows:

• Software, hardware debugging and troubleshooting before delivery to the site

• Control system fine adjustment realization

Productive-economic effect:

• Decrease of commissioning time

• Decrease of accident rate during commissioning works and exploitation

• Increase of profitability by improving control system performance properties

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Simulation unit requirements

• Unit model should simulate the movement of the real object to required

accuracy

• Cooperation supplying between control system and equipment at the

level of physical communication channels

• Automated testing option

• Simulation unit mobility for testing control algorithms at the site

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Block diagram of simulation unit and control

system for gas-measuring station

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Simulation model requirements

• Calculation main process variables in dynamics

• Main mode of exploitation modeling

(start-up, shutdown, the transition from mode to mode)

• Equipment malfunction imitation

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Simulation model

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Human machine interface

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Control system test manager

• Setting scripts for the object

• Verification of control system algorithms execution

• Reports generation of tasting results

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА

Benefits

• Decrease of commissioning time

• Decrease of accident rate during commissioning,

start-up and exploitation

• Increase of economical effect by improving control

system performance properties

РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ

НЕФТИ и

Имени И.М.ГУБКИНА

ГАЗА