9
Rings and Slings Revisited Brandon M. Smith, MD a, *, Jimmy C. Lu, MD a,b , Adam L. Dorfman, MD a,b , Maryam Ghadimi Mahani, MD b,c , Prachi P. Agarwal, MBBS, MS c INTRODUCTION Vascular rings and pulmonary artery slings are rare congenital anomalies of the aortic arch branches or pulmonary arteries that often present with symptoms of tracheal or esophageal compression during childhood. Diagnosis of these conditions can be made using various imaging modalities, including radiography, esophagography, echocar- diography, CT, and MR imaging. 1 The purpose of this review is to highlight the advantages of MR im- aging for the diagnosis of vascular rings and pul- monary artery slings and to provide an insight into the diagnosis of specific vascular ring types using case examples. ADVANTAGES OF MR IMAGING MR imaging possesses unique advantages over other imaging modalities in the diagnosis of vascular rings and pulmonary artery slings. Chest radiography can detect a right aortic arch or tracheal compression, and barium esophagogra- phy may demonstrate esophageal compression, 2 but these modalities do not directly image vascular structures and cannot provide conclu- sive anatomic diagnosis, which can be essential for surgical planning. 3 Echocardiography can diagnose aortic arch sidedness and branching pattern, double aortic arches, and pulmonary artery anatomy. Tracheal and esophageal compression cannot be evaluated, however, and due to suboptimal acoustic windows may limit diagnostic accuracy for vascular rings. 4 Angiography can image patent vascular struc- tures but cannot demonstrate tracheal and esophageal compression, requires invasive vascular access with a potential for complica- tions, and requires ionizing radiation and nephro- toxic contrast agent. Disclosures: No financial relationships or conflicts of interest to disclose. a Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michi- gan, 1540 East Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; b Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; c Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA * Corresponding author. University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, 1540 East Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-4204. E-mail address: [email protected] KEYWORDS MR imaging Vascular ring Pulmonary sling Pediatrics KEY POINTS Vascular rings and pulmonary artery slings present with symptoms of tracheal and esophageal compression during infancy and childhood. Double aortic arch and right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and left patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) are the 2 most common types of vascular ring. Atretic segments cannot be directly visualized on MR imaging, but their presence can be inferred from other indirect imaging signs. MR imaging/magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can diagnose these vascular anomalies and evaluate the airway and esophagus without the use of ionizing radiation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 23 (2015) 127–135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2014.09.011 1064-9689/15/$ – see front matter Ó 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. mri.theclinics.com

Rings and Slings Revisited

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Rings and SlingsRevisited

Brandon M. Smith, MDa,*, Jimmy C. Lu, MDa,b, Adam L. Dorfman, MDa,b,Maryam Ghadimi Mahani, MDb,c, Prachi P. Agarwal, MBBS, MSc

KEYWORDS

� MR imaging � Vascular ring � Pulmonary sling � Pediatrics

KEY POINTS

� Vascular rings and pulmonary artery slings present with symptoms of tracheal and esophagealcompression during infancy and childhood.

� Double aortic arch and right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and left patent ductusarteriosus (PDA) are the 2 most common types of vascular ring.

� Atretic segments cannot be directly visualized on MR imaging, but their presence can be inferredfrom other indirect imaging signs.

� MR imaging/magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can diagnose these vascular anomalies andevaluate the airway and esophagus without the use of ionizing radiation.

INTRODUCTION

Vascular rings and pulmonary artery slings are rarecongenital anomalies of the aortic arch branchesor pulmonary arteries that often present withsymptoms of tracheal or esophageal compressionduring childhood. Diagnosis of these conditionscan be made using various imaging modalities,including radiography, esophagography, echocar-diography, CT, and MR imaging.1 The purpose ofthis review is to highlight the advantages of MR im-aging for the diagnosis of vascular rings and pul-monary artery slings and to provide an insightinto the diagnosis of specific vascular ring typesusing case examples.

ADVANTAGES OF MR IMAGING

MR imaging possesses unique advantages overother imaging modalities in the diagnosis of

Disclosures: No financial relationships or conflicts of intea Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatgan, 1540 East Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USRadiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical CeCardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, UniAnn Arbor, MI 48109, USA* Corresponding author. University of Michigan CongenEast Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-4204.E-mail address: [email protected]

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 23 (2015) 127–135http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2014.09.0111064-9689/15/$ – see front matter � 2015 Elsevier Inc. All

vascular rings and pulmonary artery slings. Chestradiography can detect a right aortic arch ortracheal compression, and barium esophagogra-phy may demonstrate esophageal compression,2

but these modalities do not directly imagevascular structures and cannot provide conclu-sive anatomic diagnosis, which can be essentialfor surgical planning.3 Echocardiography candiagnose aortic arch sidedness and branchingpattern, double aortic arches, and pulmonaryartery anatomy. Tracheal and esophagealcompression cannot be evaluated, however,and due to suboptimal acoustic windows maylimit diagnostic accuracy for vascular rings.4

Angiography can image patent vascular struc-tures but cannot demonstrate tracheal andesophageal compression, requires invasivevascular access with a potential for complica-tions, and requires ionizing radiation and nephro-toxic contrast agent.

rest to disclose.rics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michi-A; b Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department ofnter Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; c Division ofversity of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive,

ital Heart Center, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, 1540

rights reserved. mri.th

eclinics.com

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of Edward’s hypotheticaldouble aortic arch. The 2 arches give rise to therespective carotid and subclavian arteries and ductusarteriosus. AA, ascending aorta; DA, descendingaorta; LCCA, left common carotid artery; LD, left duc-tus arteriosus; LSA, left subclavian artery; PA, pulmo-nary artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery; RD,right ductus arteriosus; RSA, right subclavian artery.

Smith et al128

Due to the ability to delineate vascular anatomywith multiplanar and 3-D reconstruction, andsimultaneously demonstrate tracheal and esopha-geal compression, CT and MR imaging havebecome the preferred imaging modalities for thediagnosis of vascular rings and pulmonary arteryslings. MRA can demonstrate vascular anatomysimilar to CTwithout using ionizing radiation, whichis particularly desirable in this young population.5

MR IMAGING PROTOCOL

MR imaging protocol for vascular ring and pulmo-nary artery sling evaluation typically consists ofgadolinium-enhanced angiography and ECG-gated black blood and bright blood sequences.

� Black blood imaging in axial and oblique cor-onal (oriented along the trachea) planes isuseful for assessment of vascular anatomy,tracheobronchial tree, and esophagus.

� Unless contraindicated, 3-D gadolinium-enhanced MRA provides comprehensiveassessment of vascular anatomy.

� ECG and respiratory navigator-gated 3-Dsteady-state free precession (SSFP) imagingcan simultaneously assess vascular, airway,and esophageal anatomy in a 3-D data setwithout the need for gadolinium.

VASCULAR RINGS

A vascular ring is defined as an abnormality of theaortic arch, its branches, or remnants that resultsin encircling of the trachea and esophagus withvariable degrees of compression. Vascular ringsrepresent 1% to 3% of congenital cardiac anoma-lies6 and may remain asymptomatic or present atvarious times throughout childhood with stridor,dyspnea, chronic cough, wheezing, recurrent res-piratory infection, or dysphagia, which may berelieved by surgery.7

Normal Aortic Arch Development

Normal aortic arch development involves variableregression of 6 paired aortic arches from the aorticsac to the paired dorsal aortae. The first, second,and third arches form parts of the maxillary, stape-dial, and common carotid arteries, respectively.8

Remnants of the fourth arch form the distal leftaortic arch and proximal right subclavian artery.The fifth arches usually regress, and the sixtharches form parts of the pulmonary arteries anddistal ductus arteriosus. The spectrum of aorticarch anomalies and vascular rings can be easilyunderstood using the Edwards hypothetical dou-ble arch system (Fig. 1). Normal left arch anatomy

occurs after involution of the distal right fourth archand regression of the right ductus (Fig. 2).Abnormal patterns of regression of these pairedaortic arches can result in a vascular ring.Aortic arch sidedness is defined by the location

of the aortic arch in relation to the trachea (left,right, or double) as it passes over the mainstembronchus (Fig. 3).9 On echocardiography andangiography, this determination is indirect andmay be inaccurate. MR imaging directly visualizesboth the aorta and tracheobronchial tree, thus al-lowing conclusive diagnosis.The spectrum of vascular rings (Table 1), with

their distinctive MR imaging appearance, isdescribed later.

Double Aortic Arch

Double aortic arch, a persistence of the right andleft 4th embryonic arches, is the most commonform of vascular ring, comprising approximately50% of cases, and often presents from birththrough childhood with respiratory symptoms,

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of development of the leftaortic arch with normal brachiocephalic branching.The right arch (between the right subclavian arteryand descending aorta) involutes along with regres-sion of the right ductus arteriosus (dashed lines).AA, ascending aorta; DA, descending aorta; LCCA,left common carotid artery; LD, left ductus arteriosus;LSA, left subclavian artery; PA, pulmonary artery;RCCA, right common carotid artery; RD, right ductusarteriosus; RSA, right subclavian artery.

Rings and Slings Revisited 129

such as stridor, asthma, and recurrent croup.8 As-sociation with other cardiac anomalies is uncom-mon, but approximately 10% to 15% of patientsmay have a chromosome 22q11 deletion.10

When both arches are patent (whether codomi-nant or asymmetric in size), imaging diagnosis isstraightforward (Fig. 4), and associated tracheal

Fig. 3. Axial (A) and coronal (B) cine SSFP MR images demright main stem bronchus (arrow).

compression is often present. Dominant rightarch with hypoplastic or atretic left arch is mostcommon (prevalence 70%–75%1), whereas domi-nant left arch or codominant aortic arches are lesscommon (prevalence 20% and 5%, respec-tively11). Determining the dominant aortic arch isimportant for surgical planning, because thoracot-omy is performed on the side of the nondominantarch.12 Also, it is important to recognize a hypo-plastic but patent arch, because a thoracoscopicapproach may not be preferred with a patentnondominant arch due to risk of bleeding.

The imaging diagnosis of double aortic arch withdistal left arch atresia can be more challenging.The embryologic basis for this anomaly is atresia(with a residual fibrous cord) between the left sub-clavian artery and descending aorta. If the atresiaoccurs between the left ductus and left subclavianartery, both the atretic cord and ligamentum atta-ch to the descending aortic diverticulum (Fig. 5)and need to be addressed at surgery. If the regres-sion abnormality is in the segment after the ductus,however, only the fibrous cord completes the ringand attaches to the aortic diverticulum. The ductusthen arises from the anterior left arch (Fig. 6).

Right aortic arch with mirror image branchingalso involves regression of the segment after theductus (Fig. 7), with the ductus arising from theinnominate artery. The only difference from thepreviously described double aortic arch is thatthe involution is complete, with no residual fibrouscord and thus no vascular ring. On imaging, a dou-ble aortic arch with atretic left arch can mimic aright aortic arch with mirror image branchingbecause the atretic segment itself cannot bedirectly visualized. The 2 most important differen-tiating features seen in a double aortic arch includethe 4-vessel sign (symmetric arrangement of thecarotids and subclavian arteries from the 2 arches)and a diverticulum from the descending aorta.13

onstrate a right aortic arch (asterisk) crossing over the

Table 1Vascular ring and pulmonary artery sling types

Vascular Ring TypeTotal VascularRings (%)

Association with CHD orSyndromes

Typical Age atPresentation

DAA1,8 50 Usually isolated anomaly Birth–childhoodRight dominant 70–75 of DAALeft dominant 20 of DAACodominant 5 of DAA

Right aortic arch withaberrant leftsubclavian4,14,15

30 Usually isolated anomaly Infancy–adulthoodMay remain

asymptomaticdue to loose ring

Right aortic arch withmirror image branchingand retroesophagealductus arteriosus19

5 Commonly associatedwith other CHDs, suchas tetralogy of Fallot,truncus arteriosus,ventricular septal defect

Infancy–childhood

Circumflex aortic arch20,21 Rare 50%–60% Associatedwith CHDs, such asventricular septaldefect, double-outletright ventricle, andcoarctation

Birth–childhood

Abbreviations: CHD, congenital heart disease; DAA, double aortic arch.

Smith et al130

Another subjective sign is a more posteriorly posi-tioned incomplete left arch compared with theinnominate artery in a right arch with mirror imagebranching (Fig. 8). Similarly, a double aortic archwith atresia between the left carotid and leftsubclavian arteries can simulate the imagingappearance of right arch with retro esophagealdiverticulum of Kommerell.

Fig. 4. Double aortic arch. Axial black blood image (A) demthe right arch the larger of the 2. Note the narrowed tracharches is well seen on the volume-rendered reconstruction

Right Aortic Arch with Aberrant LeftSubclavian Artery and Left Ductus Arteriosus

Right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian ar-tery and left ductus arteriosus is the secondmost common form of vascular ring, comprisingapproximately 30% of cases,4 and is also usuallyan isolated finding, with a 5% to 15% prevalenceof associated congenital heart disease.14 The

onstrates bilateral patent aortic arches (arrows), withea (asterisk). The complete ring formed by the 2 patentfrom the gadolinium-enhanced MRA (B).

Fig. 5. Schematic diagram showing embryologic basis ofa double aortic arch with distal left arch atresia. Due toabnormal regressionbetweenthe leftductusand left sub-clavian artery, both the atretic cord and ductus attach tothe descending aortic diverticulum. AA, ascending aorta;DA, descending aorta; LCCA, left common carotid artery;LD, left ductus arteriosus; LSA, left subclavian artery; PA,pulmonary artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery;RD, right ductus arteriosus; RSA, right subclavian artery.

Fig. 6. Schematic diagram showing embryologic basisof a double aortic arch with distal left arch atresia. Dueto atresia of the segment after the ductus, only thefibrous cord completes the ring and attaches to theaortic diverticulum. AA, ascending aorta; DA, descend-ingaorta; LCCA, left commoncarotidartery; LD, left duc-tus arteriosus; LSA, left subclavian artery; PA, pulmonaryartery; RCCA, right common carotid artery; RD, rightductus arteriosus; RSA, right subclavian artery.

Fig. 7. Schematic diagram showing embryologic basisof a right aortic arch with mirror image branching.There is complete involution of the segment (dashedlines) after the ductus with the ductus arising fromthe innominate artery. AA, ascending aorta; DA, de-scending aorta; LCCA, left common carotid artery;LD, left ductus arteriosus; LSA, left subclavian artery;PA, pulmonary artery; RCCA, right common carotid ar-tery; RD, right ductus arteriosus; RSA, right subclavianartery.

131

presentation is variable, with approximately 40%of patients experiencing symptoms.15 Right aorticarch with aberrant left subclavian artery resultsfrom regression of the left aortic arch segment be-tween the left common carotid and subclavian ar-teries (Fig. 9). Although the ligamentum arteriosumcannot be directly identified, its position can be in-ferred by noting an increased caliber of the prox-imal left subclavian artery from the descendingaorta (referred to as Kommerell diverticulum)(Fig. 10). Kommerell diverticulum is related toflow from the PDA through the proximal aberrantleft subclavian artery during fetal circulation. Thisincreased flow creates the caliber difference ofthe proximal aberrant left subclavian artery withtapering to a normal caliber9 distal to the pre-sumed site of ductus arteriosus. In the absenceof a left ductus, the aberrant left subclavian arteryhas uniform caliber throughout (Fig. 11) and isoften seen in association with conotruncalanomalies. In these circumstances, there is novascular ring.

If symptomatic, usually presenting from child-hood to adult age with swallowing difficulty rather

Fig. 8. Double aortic arch and distal left arch atresia. Axial black blood images (A–C) and volume-rendered recon-struction from gadolinium-enhanced MRA (D) depict the anatomy of the vascular ring. Note the 4-vessel signwith symmetric arrangement of carotid and subclavian arteries from the ipsilateral arches (A). Slightly morecaudally (B), a dominant right (R) arch is seen with atresia of distal left arch. The atretic arch itself is not directlyvisualized. Also, note the diverticulum (arrow) from the aorta (C, D). LCCA, left common carotid artery; LSA, leftsubclavian artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery; RSA, right subclavian artery.

Fig. 9. Schematic diagram showing embryologic basisof a right aortic arch with retroesophageal divertic-ulum of Kommerell. There is involution of thesegment (dashed lines) of left arch between the leftcarotid and left subclavian artery with regression ofthe right ductus. AA, ascending aorta; DA, descendingaorta; LCCA, left common carotid artery; LD, left duc-tus arteriosus; LSA, left subclavian artery; PA, pulmo-nary artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery; RD,right ductus arteriosus; RSA, right subclavian artery.

Fig. 10. Coronal oblique gadolinium-enhanced MRangiogram of a right aortic arch with retroesophagealdiverticulum of Kommerell (asterisk). Note the changein caliber of the aberrant left subclavian artery (arrow)after the diverticulum (asterisk) at the presumed site ofleft ductus. This anomaly comprises a vascular ring.

132

Fig. 11. Coronal oblique gadolinium-enhanced MRangiogram of a right aortic arch with aberrant leftsubclavian artery and no left ductus. Note the uniformcaliber of the left subclavian artery (arrow) and theabsence of retroesophageal diverticulum of Kommer-ell. This entity does not constitute a vascular ring.

Fig. 12. Schematic diagram showing embryologic basisof a right aortic arch with mirror image branching andretroesophageal ductus. There is involution of thesegment (dashed lines) of left arch between the left duc-tus and left subclavian artery. AA, ascending aorta; DA,descending aorta; LCCA, left common carotid artery;LD, left ductus arteriosus; LSA, left subclavian artery; PA,pulmonary artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery;RD, right ductus arteriosus; RSA, right subclavian artery.

Rings and Slings Revisited 133

than respiratory distress, surgical division of theligamentum arteriosum via thoracotomy is theusual management.3,7 Rarely, a left aortic archwith aberrant right subclavian artery and right-sided ductus arteriosus or ligamentum arteriosummay cause a mirror image vascular ring of the rightaortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery.16

Right Aortic Arch with Mirror ImageBranching and Retroesophageal PatentDuctus Arteriosus

Right aortic arch with mirror image branching hasa reported 66% to 98% reported incidence ofassociated congenital heart disease accompa-nying intracardiac abnormalities, such as tetralogyof Fallot and truncus arteriosus.2,17,18 This classi-cally does not form a vascular ring (see Fig. 7).Infrequently, however, a right aortic arch withmirror image branching may form a vascular ring

due to a ductus or ligamentum arteriosum fromthe proximal descending aorta that courses poste-rior to the trachea and esophagus prior to insertinginto the left pulmonary artery (Fig. 12).19 MR imag-ing and MRA again aid in identification of an aorticdimple (tapered blind-ending outpouching), which,in conjunction with symptoms or evidence oftracheal or esophageal compression, help confirmthe diagnosis. Division of the ductus/ligamentumarteriosum is the treatment of this lesion.16

Because this lesion is less common than doubleaortic arch with atretic left arch, however, sur-geons should also inspect for an atretic left aorticarch segment, which, if present, also needs to bedivided to relieve the ring.

Circumflex Aortic Arch

Circumflex aortic arch is a rare vascular anomalyconsisting of an aortic arch with a retroesophagealsegment and proximal descending aorta contra-lateral to the arch (Fig. 13). A vascular ring occurswith a right circumflex aortic arch and left PDAfrom the descending aorta to the left pulmonary ar-tery or with a left circumflex aortic arch and right

Fig. 13. Circumflex right aortic arch with left descending aorta and aberrant left subclavian artery (LSA). Axialcine SSFP images (A–C) demonstrate circumflex right arch (R) with retroesophageal (asterisk) segment and leftdescending aorta (DA). The left subclavian artery is aberrant and arises as the last branch. The retroesophagealvessel is the arch itself, however, and not the subclavian artery with a diverticulum of Kommerell. Volume-rendered image (D) demonstrates the anatomy of the circumflex right arch with retroesophageal (asterisk)segment and the aberrant left subclavian artery (LSA) with a diverticulum of Kommerell (arrow).

Smith et al134

PDA. An aberrant subclavian artery may alsooccur, although this entity differs from a rightarch and aberrant left subclavian artery with diver-ticulum of Kommerell in that the aorta itself is ret-roesophageal and not the subclavian artery.There is 50% to 60%prevalence for additional car-diac anomalies.20,21 Chest radiography and echo-cardiography have shown poor sensitivity for thisdiagnosis, whereas MR imaging can accuratelydefine the aortic arch anatomy for surgicalplanning.20

Fig. 14. Pulmonary artery sling. Axial black blood im-age demonstrates left pulmonary artery (L) arisingfrom the proximal right pulmonary artery andcoursing posterior to the trachea (asterisk). AA,ascending aorta, DA, descending aorta.

PULMONARY ARTERY SLINGS

A pulmonary artery sling is an anomalous origin ofthe left pulmonary artery from the right pulmonaryartery with a course between the trachea andesophagus (Fig. 14). Presenting symptoms, oftenduring the neonatal period or infancy, include stri-dor, respiratory distress, and recurrent respiratoryinfection.22 A type I sling is just above the carina atT4-5 level and is usually associated with a normal

trachea. Type II slings are located more caudallyadjacent to a low T-shaped carina at T5-6 leveland often have long segment tracheal stenosisdue to complete cartilaginous tracheal rings,22,23

resulting in an O-shaped trachea with absent

Rings and Slings Revisited 135

pars membranacea. Because the trachealobstruction is primary and not just by extrinsiccompression, the surgical treatment involves tra-cheoplasty in addition to addressing the vascularabnormality. MR imaging can clearly demonstratethe origin and course of the anomalous left pulmo-nary artery.24 Although airways can be visualizedon MR imaging, CT may be better suited for pre-cise airway assessment.

SUMMARY

Vascular rings and pulmonary artery slings are arare group of vascular anomalies, often presentingwith symptoms of tracheal or esophagealcompression during childhood. Despite the num-ber of variations, these anomalies can be betterappreciated with an understanding of their embry-ology and can be comprehensively evaluated withMR imaging, without ionizing radiation.

REFERENCES

1. Dillman JR, Attili AK, Agarwal PP, et al. Common and

uncommon vascular rings and slings: a multi-

modality review. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41(11):1440–54

[quiz: 1489–90].

2. Hernanz-Schulman M. Vascular rings: a practical

approach to imaging diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol

2005;35(10):961–79.

3. van Son JA, Julsrud PR, Hagler DJ, et al. Surgical

treatment of vascular rings: the Mayo Clinic experi-

ence. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68(11):1056–63.

4. van Son JA, Julsrud PR, Hagler DJ, et al. Imaging

strategies for vascular rings. Ann Thorac Surg

1994;57(3):604–10.

5. Azarow KS, Pearl RH, Hoffman MA, et al. Vascular

ring: does magnetic resonance imaging replace

angiography? Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53(5):882–5.

6. Marmon LM, Bye MR, Haas JM, et al. Vascular rings

and slings: long-term follow-up of pulmonary func-

tion. J Pediatr Surg 1984;19(6):683–92.

7. Oddone M, Granata C, Vercellino N, et al. Multi-mo-

dality evaluation of the abnormalities of the aortic

arches in children: techniques and imaging spec-

trum with emphasis on MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2005;

35(10):947–60.

8. Kellenberger CJ. Aortic arch malformations. Pediatr

Radiol 2010;40(6):876–84.

9. Weinberg PM. Aortic arch anomalies. J Cardiovasc

Magn Reson 2006;8(4):633–43.

10. McElhinney DB, Clark BJ 3rd, Weinberg PM, et al.

Association of chromosome 22q11 deletion with iso-

lated anomalies of aortic arch laterality and branch-

ing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37(8):2114–9.

11. Kimura-Hayama ET, Melendez G, Mendizabal AL,

et al. Uncommon congenital and acquired aortic dis-

eases: role of multidetector CT angiography. Radio-

graphics 2010;30(1):79–98.

12. McFaul R, Millard P, Nowicki E. Vascular rings

necessitating right thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardio-

vasc Surg 1981;82(2):306–9.

13. Schlesinger AE, Krishnamurthy R, Sena LM, et al.

Incomplete double aortic arch with atresia of the

distal left arch: distinctive imaging appearance.

AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(5):1634–9.

14. Shuford WH, Sybers RG. The aortic arch and its mal-

formations; with emphasis on the angiographic fea-

tures. Springfield (IL): Thomas; 1973.

15. Suh YJ, Kim GB, Kwon BS, et al. Clinical course of

vascular rings and risk factors associated with mor-

tality. Korean Circ J 2012;42(4):252–8.

16. Kussman BD, Geva T, McGowan FX. Cardiovascular

causes of airway compression. Paediatr Anaesth

2004;14(1):60–74.

17. Zidere V, Tsapakis EG, Huggon IC, et al. Right aortic

arch in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;

28(7):876–81.

18. Kersting-Sommerhoff BA, Sechtem UP, Fisher MR,

et al. MR imaging of congenital anomalies of the

aortic arch. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149(1):9–13.

19. McElhinney DB, Hoydu AK, Gaynor JW, et al. Pat-

terns of right aortic arch and mirror-image branching

of the brachiocephalic vessels without associated

anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol 2001;22(4):285–91.

20. Philip S, Chen SY, Wu MH, et al. Retroesophageal

aortic arch: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

of a rare vascular ring. Int J Cardiol 2001;79(2–3):

133–41.

21. Ergin MA, Jayaram N, LaCorte M. Left aortic arch

and right descending aorta: diagnostic and thera-

peutic implications of a rare type of vascular ring.

Ann Thorac Surg 1981;31(1):82–5.

22. Pawade A, de Leval MR, Elliott MJ, et al. Pulmonary

artery sling. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54(5):967–70.

23. Berdon WE. Rings, slings, and other things: vascular

compression of the infant trachea updated from the

midcentury to the millennium–the legacy of Robert

E. Gross, MD, and Edward B. D. Neuhauser, MD.

Radiology 2000;216(3):624–32.

24. Eichhorn J, Fink C, Delorme S, et al. Rings, slings

and other vascular abnormalities. Ultrafast

computed tomography and magnetic resonance

angiography in pediatric cardiology. Z Kardiol

2004;93(3):201–8.