Upload
khangminh22
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
surface finishing guidebook
2
Fueled by more active lifestyles and increased life expectancy,
the market for knee, hip, and other replacement body joints
is on the rise. With more than $19 billion in annual worldwide
sales, implants for joint reconstruction make up nearly 40 per-
cent of all orthopedic product sales.
Thanks to significant advancements in materials and new or im-
proved surface finishing technologies, today’s artificial hips and
knees can last more than 20 years, giving the recipient decades
of comfort and agility.
Parts that are finished using modern mass finishing and shot
blasting methods are playing a key role in extending the life
span of orthopedic implants. Steps that include cleaning, de-
burring/edge radiusing, surface smoothing, post-casting sur-
face preparation, machining, CNC grinding, and of course final
finishing are making big differences in the quality and perfor-
mance of such products.
Executive Summary
In this guidebook, we will offer a primer on mass finishing and
shot blasting technologies, including a look at the equipment
and methods specifically used in the surface refinement of joint
reconstruction implants. To highlight the versatility of the two
surface finishing methods, we will illustrate in further detail how
mass finishing and shot blasting processes add value in the
production and processing of specific types of implants.
Please contact us for other guidebooks that cover
spinal implants, trauma implants, or medical instruments.
orthopedic implants
3
Why quality matters for orthopedic implants p 4
Types of orthopedic implants commonly used in joint reconstruction p 4
Required quality and performance characteristics of orthopedic implants p 5
Materials used for manufacture of joint reconstruction implants p 6
The finishing quality of joint reconstruction implants must meet the most stringent standards p 7
The benefits of mass finishing and shot blasting for finishing the surface of orthopedic implants p 8
The smooth and perfectly polished results of the mass finishing process p 9
How shot blasting cleans and prepares surfaces and extends implant life spans p 11
Mass finishing and shot blasting results support improved quality and efficiency p 13
A look at the most common finishing applications for joint reconstruction implants in more detail p 14
Orthopedic Implants: A Look Ahead p 19
Contents
surface finishing guidebook
4
It would come as no surprise to most casual observers that
quality standards for orthopedic implants are among the most
demanding to be found in any manufacturing operation. Due
to the need to facilitate millions of movements between mul-
tiple parts, joint reconstruction implant requirements are es-
pecially rigorous.
Aside from choosing the right materials and producing these
parts to exacting, minimal dimensional tolerances, surface fin-
ishes, too, must be honed to perfection. This often involves
two distinct finishes on the same component. For example, the
front surface section of an artificial knee femoral must be ex-
tremely smooth, as it has to move freely on the tibia plate; con-
versely, on the backside of these implants, a textured, some-
As the name already suggests, the purpose of orthopedic joint
reconstruction implants (also called “endoprosthetics”) is to re-
place damaged joints by inserting a manufactured replacement
into the body. The most common of these replacement joints
are artificial knees and hips, which constitute almonst 90 per-
cent of the worldwide demand of joint implants. But, as a result
of various technological breakthroughs, other extremity joint
implants for ankles, shoulders, elbows, hands, feet, and jaws,
have been growing at an accelerated rate.
Unlike trauma implants, which may be removed after a bone
has healed, the goal for joint reconstruction implants is to re-
main permanently in the body to restore normal, pain-free
function of the respective joint. The longevity of these implants
has been constantly improved, with a working life today of
more than 20 years.
Why Quality Matters for Orthopedic Implants
what rougher surface must be used to allow osseointegration
of the implants into the bone.
In fact, orthopedic implants may have to undergo multiple fin-
ishing operations during the manufacturing process. These
operations can range from simple cleaning, deburring/edge
radiusing and surface smoothing after casting, forging and ma-
chining; to surface texturing, preparation for special coatings
and, frequently, high-gloss polishing. Some implants are even
shot peened to induce a compressive residual stress that will
further extend their service life
Types of Orthopedic Implants Commonly Used in Joint Reconstruction
Joint reconstruction can be a particularly challenging process,
because the implants must allow free movement of the joint
and, at the same time, must be firmly attached to the respec-
tive bones.
orthopedic implants
5
BiocompatibilityThe implants must be compatible with the living tissue by not being toxic, injuri-ous, or physiologically reactive and not causing immunological rejection. This includes corrosion resistance to prevent reaction with bodily fluids.
High tensile strength and long life spanJoint reconstruction implants are exposed to considerable static and dynamic loads. They must withstand these loads for a lifetime without ever breaking.
Low friction at the joint contact areasThis requires very smooth, polished surfaces of those joint areas that are moving against each other. e.g. between femoral and tibia or femoral head and lining of the acetabular cup.
No sharp edges. All edges must be rounded
Sharp edges can cause ruptured blood vessels and blood clots during insertion and the healing process.
High osseointegration at surface areas, which are implanted into the bone
This requires a somewhat textured, rougher surface to allow the bone tissue at-taching itself to the implant.
Low dimensional tolerancesThe implant components must be very precise so that the fit and function of the joint is not compromised.
Joint reconstruction implants are subject to the same zero-
defect performance and reliability standards as any other
implants. However, because two components are always in-
Required Quality and Performance Characteristics of Orthopedic Implants
teracting with each other, dimensional accuracy is of particu-
lar importance. Other characteristics of orthopedic implants
include:
surface finishing guidebook
6
To date, the most common materials have been titanium,
titanium alloys and cobalt-chromium alloys. Both materials are
very tough, resistant to corrosion, highly biocompatible, and
absolutely reliable.
While stainless steel often is used for trauma implants, it is not
very common in joint reconstruction implants because of its
limited long-term ability to withstand corrosion in the human
body. Plastics, primarily polyethylene (for example, UHMWPE),
have also increased in favor for joint reconstruction implants.
Materials Used for Manufacture of Joint Reconstruction Implants
The interface between two joint sections can consist of metal-
on-plastic, metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-plastic or ceramic-on-
ceramic.
For example, the section of the knee tibia plate that interacts
with the femoral component is protected with a polyethylene
liner. Likewise, the acetabular cup of a hip implant can be
lined with polyethylene, whereas the femoral head on the
hip stem interacting with the acetabular cup may be made of
metal.
Let’s take a closer look at some alternative materials sometimes used in the manufacturing process:
Because of its excellent wear
characteristics and the best
biocompatibility among the known
implant materials, ceramic is
quickly becoming an excellent
alternative to titanium and
cobalt chrome.
Ceramic
Plasma coating is primarily used to
promote osseointegration on those
surface areas of implants that must
bond with the surrounding bone
tissue. To ensure perfect adhe-
sion of the coating, the respective
surface area must be textured
(“roughened”) by shot blasting.
Plasma Coating
Joint reconstruction implants
frequently receive a PVD coating,
mainly with titanium nitride (TiN).
Such coatings provide numerous
technical advantages, including:
� Improved wear resistance
� Reduced friction
� High biocompatibility
� Decorative colors
PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition)
orthopedic implants
7
The Finishing Quality of Joint Reconstruction Implants must Meet the Most Stringent Standards
Additive manufacturing is rapidly evolving from a purely
prototyping method into a full-fledged manufacturing sys-
tem, and there’s little doubt this trend will continue. This
trend has also reached the orthopedic implant industry.
Hip implants, but also knee and other joint replacements
already are made through additive manufacturing.
No doubt, this trend will continue over the coming years.
But additive manufactured components still pose enor-
mous finishing challenges: Not only must the support
structures and sintered metal particles be successfully re-
moved, but also a significantly higher surface roughness
be overcome. The initial surface roughness of a 3D print-
ed component can be as high as Ra = 2,000 microinches
(= 50 µm), while the initial surface roughness of a cast or
Joint reconstruction implants are subject to rigorous finishing
standards. Though choosing the right implant material is of
utmost importance, the significance of optimum surface treat-
ment cannot be overstated. This relates not only to the right
surface finish, but also total compliance with the specified tight
dimensional tolerances.
The functionality of a joint implant in the body is determined
by the perfect match between the various implant compo-
nents. This depends to a large extent on the surface treatment
procedure(s). The most important finishing requirements for
joint reconstruction implants are:
� No sharp edges or burs, to prevent rupturing of blood ves-
sels and blood clots during implantation and to expedite
the healing process
� An extremely smooth, polished surface on the implant ar-
eas that are interacting with each other, with Ra readings of
less than 1.0 microinches (= 0.025 µm)
� A textured, somewhat rougher surface finish on those ar-
eas that are implanted into the bone, to promote osseo-
integration
� Absolutely clean surfaces, without any contamination to
prevent infections
� A slightly textured surface as preparation for surface
coatings
� Longevity, i.e. improved resistance against tensile and
bending stress, is achieved by shot peening.
� Maintaining critical component dimensions during the
various finishing operations
Spotlight: Special Challenges of Finishing 3D Printed Joint
Reconstruction Implants
forged part amounts “only” to Ra = 120 – 320 microinches
(= 3 to 8 µm). Since it promotes bone growth, the higher
surface roughness is an advantage for surface areas im-
planted into the bone, but presents a challenge for those
surface areas that must be extremely smooth.
surface finishing guidebook
8
Shot blasting and mass finishing have become indispensable technologies for surface preparation and finishing of joint reconstruction
implants. Their applications range from surface cleaning, deburring, edge radiusing after forging, casting, 3D printing, machining, etc.;
to surface preparation for different kinds of coatings, increasing the longevity of an implant, and placing a final, extremely smooth high
gloss finish on the implants before insertion.
The Benefits of Mass Finishing and Shot Blasting for Finishing the Surface of Orthopedic Implants
Mass finishing is a grinding system, leveraging the
pressure between the media and work pieces,
combined with the constant “rubbing” of the media
against the work pieces. This generates a grinding
and polishing effect, leaving a smooth surface finish
that can be as low as Ra = 0.8 microinches (0.02 µm)
Shot blasting is an impact system in which small
metal or mineral pellets are thrown onto the surface
of a work piece at speeds of 200 – 800 feet/second.
The impact on the work piece surface produces
the desired cleaning, peening or texturing effect.
For medical applications, mainly air and wet blast
systems are used which generally make a surface
rougher. The smoothest finishes achieved with shot
blasting are about Ra = 16 - 32 microinches
(= 0.4 to 0.8 µm)
Mass finishing is a grinding system
Shot blasting is an impact system
� The creation of homogeneous, all-around “isotropic”
(multi directional) finishes as opposed to “anisotropic”
(mono directional) surface structures produced by ma-
chining, belt and wheel grinding, drawing and extrusion.
� Ability to handle all materials, from the toughest metals
like titanium and platinum to all kinds of polymers and,
even, ceramics.
� Consistent, absolutely repeatable finishing results.
� Elimination of quality fluctuations inherent in manual or
other mechanical finishing methods
� Ability to choose from a broad equipment spectrum, from
simple, low-cost standalone machines to fully automated
finishing systems
Other features and benefits of shot blasting and mass finishing include:
orthopedic implants
9
Mass finishing is a highly versatile finishing technology that can be used for a wide variety of different surface treatment operations.
As a result, it is no surprise that mass finishing processes are utilized at practically every manufacturing stage for all kinds of orthope-
dic implants. For example, mass finishing is used for:
Surface cleaning
Final polishing of knee femorals, femoral
heads and the inside of acetabular cups to
Ra = 0.8 micro inches (= 0.02 µm) as the last
finishing stage before implantation
The Smooth and Perfectly Polished Results of the Mass Finishing Process
Deburring/edge radiusing
Deburring and surface smoothing of various
implants after belt or CNC grinding
Polishing
Descaling and edge radiusing of hip stems, knee
femorals and other implants after forging or
casting, e.g. lost wax or investment casting
Polished knee implants fxtured in a
drag finsihing machine before being
removed
Surface Smoothing
Surface grinding makes the surface smoother.
It is frequently used as a preparation for subse-
quent polishing or blasting processes.
surface finishing guidebook
10
Spotlight: The most common mass finishing machines
Considering their critical function in the body, joint reconstruction implants must have a perfect surface finish free
of any blemishes. Even the smallest nick or dent on a component will render them unsuitable for implantation. That
is why during the various finishing operations, the implants must not tumble over each other but must be firmly at-
tached to work piece holders, so that they avoid any contact with each other during the entire finishing process.
Drag Finishers
� Used For: Finishing of knee, hip and other joint reconstruction
implants
� Key Benefits: Extremely smooth and polished surface finishes on
a wide array of implants, with zero defects, and at surprisingly low
costs.
� How it Works: The work pieces are individually attached to work
stations on a rotating carousel and are dragged through a stationary
work bowl filled with media
Automated drag finishers with robotic work piece handling
� Used In: Fully-automated, robotic-driven processes
� Key Benefits: Creates autonomous, fully automated manufacturing
cells, which can be easily integrated into the overall manufacturing
process.
� How it Works: Robots equipped with specially designed gripper
systems load and unload the work pieces to and from the work
stations, equipped with a pneumatically-activated quick connect
coupling system.
Rotary Vibrators (Type DL)
� Used For: Finishing of ankle and shoulder implants and acetabular
cups, or small volumes of knee femorals and tibia plates.
� Key Benefits: Efficient processing of low production volumes
� How it Works: Machine equipped with two vibratory motors
mounted on the outside of the processing bowl. The work pieces
are mounted to fixtures in the bottom of the bowl. This eliminates
the risk of nicking and greatly reduces the risk of media lodging in
the work pieces.
Other mass finishing machines
For less delicate work pieces like screws, trauma and spinal im-
plants, certain medical instruments, etc., standard rotary or tub
vibrators or high-energy centrifugal disk finishing machines can
be utilized.
orthopedic implants
11
How Shot Blasting Cleans and Prepares Surfaces and Extends Implant Life SpanLike mass finishing, shot blasting is an exceptionally versatile
surface treatment technology. Its applications range from gen-
eral cleaning after casting and forging, to shot peening, and
even cosmetic blasting for placing a fine, matte finish on the
work pieces.
For shot blasting of orthopedic implants, primarily air blasting,
but also wet blasting systems are employed: The blast media is
accelerated by compressed air and thrown at the work pieces
through a blast nozzle. This allows an extremely precise blast
pattern suitable for use with metallic, mineral, and organic blast
media. The most common shot blasting tasks for joint recon-
struction implants are:
� Surface cleaning after casting and forging
� Surface texturing as preparation for coating
� Cosmetic blasting
� Preliminary surface smoothing of 3D printed implants
� Shot peening
Shot peening increases component life by bombard-
ing the work piece surface with a stream of special
blast media. Each pellet forms a dimple in the surface,
creating a so-called compressive stress. The result:
Extension of the fatigue life of a component along with
increased load bearing capabilities and higher wear
resistance. Typical joint implants that are shot peened
include hip stems, femorals, and tibia plates.
Wet blasting uses a slurry consisting of water and abrasive or
non-abrasive media. Before being thrown at the work pieces
the slurry is accelerated by a special pump and compressed
air. Wet blasting generates no dust and can be calibrated
from very gentle to aggressive blasting. It creates no metal
erosion or media impregnation in the work pieces, no heat
warping of thin parts. It has a cleaning effect, even without
chemicals, allowing for very fine, textured finishes. A typical
use would be for the leveling of machining lines on tibia plates
and to texture the bone contact areas of implants
Shot Peening
Wet Blasting
surface finishing guidebook
12
Surface cleaning
Descaling after forging, casting or heat treat-
ment. The surface usually becomes rougher.
Cosmetic blasting/texturing
A very fine, matte, anti-glare finished is
placed on components, for example,
surgical instruments.
The finishing tasks for shot blasting
Spotlight: Pre-smoothing of 3D printed components by blasting
Shot blasting normally makes a surface rougher, but since 3D printed parts have a very rough initial surface,
shot blasting has a smoothing effect. It is used for pre-smoothing prior to mass finishing.
Roughness readings
Raw part: Rz = 1,700 micro in. (43 µm)
After shot blasting: Rz = 880 micro in. (22 µm)
After mass finishing: Rz = 120 micro in. (3 µm)
Peening
Inducing a compressive stress in a component
surface makes it more resistant against general
wear and corrosion stress cracking.
Surface preparation for coating
Surface texturing creates better
adhesion of the coating material.
0
500 | 12,5
1000 | 25
1500 | 37.5
2000 | 50
Surf
ace
read
ing
(Rz)
in
mic
ro in
ches
| µ
m
Surface conditions of 3D printed parts
Raw part After blasting After mass finishing
Satellite Table Machines
� Used For: Hip stems, tibia plates and other orthopedic implants
� Key Benefits: Prevention of contact between work pieces
� How it Works: These blast machines are equipped with a rotary ta-
ble containing 4 to 12 independently rotating satellite stations. The
work pieces are attached to the satellites, which then pass through
one or multiple blast stations equipped with several blast nozzles.
Spotlight: The most common shot blasting machines for orthopedic implants
(dry blasting, wet blasting or shot peenig)
orthopedic implants
13
Swing Table Machines
� Used For: Finishing of orthopedic implants.
� Key Benefits: Efficiency, prevention of contact between work pieces
� How it Works: Blast machines are equipped with a round table with
two rotating satellite workstations, one in the blast zone and one in
the load/unload zone. This allows loading/unloading one set of work
pieces, while another set is shot blasted.
Robotic Blasting Systems
� Used For: Complex part geometries and large part variety
� Key Benefits: Repeatable and precise process
� How it Works: The robot holds either the part or the blast nozzles
and follows the pre-prgrammed blast path to blast the part
Mass finishing and shot blasting results support improved quality and efficiencyBoth mass finishing and shot blasting are not only very cost-
effective, but also highly adaptable to customer needs. The
equipment spectrum ranges from small manual or semi-auto-
matic machines for low production volumes, to fully automatic
systems for high volume production.
The customer decides on the budget, and what degree of auto-
mation he desires. Generally, the costs for work piece fixtures
are manageable, and, due to the high degree of mechanization
and automation, personnel costs comprise only a small per-
centage of the total process cost.
The big savings are, however, achieved by the stability of the
finishing processes. Once a process has been established, it
produces absolutely repeatable, high-quality finishing results
with zero scrap rates, day-in and day-out.
Most machines can be equipped with automated work
piece loading and unloading to achieve � High production volumes
� Improved efficiency and throughput
� Improved cost efficiency
surface finishing guidebook
14
Titanium Knee Femorals
Finishing Task (1) Surface smoothing after CNC grinding,
(2) Producing a pre-polish surface,
(3) High gloss polishing.
Mass Finishing Solution 3-stage process (cut-down, smoothing, polishing) in compact drag finishers with
(1) Fast cutting ceramic media,
(2) Special pre-polish plastic media and
(3) Organic dry polishing media
Finishing equipment 3 x Rosler drag finisher R 4/700 SF. Working capacity per machine: 12 knee femorals
per batch
Capacity Processing times:
(1) Cut-down = 80 min.,
(2) Fine grinding = 60 min.,
(3) Dry polishing = 30 min.
Capacity = about 9 pieces/hour
A look at the most common finishing applications for joint reconstruction implants in more detail
orthopedic implants
15
3D Printed Acetabular Cups
Finishing Task Removal of machining lines from the concave cup surface area; creating a mat finish.
Threaded holes must not be affected
Shot Blasting Solution Manual processing in a wet blast cabinet with ceramic beads
Finishing equipment Rosler wet blast cabinet RWB 48 with turntable.
Capacity Processing time = 5 min. per piece.
Capacity = about 12 pieces/hour
Finishing Task Leveling of machining lines on the backside of titanium tibia plates
Shot Blasting Solution Processing in wet blast cabinet with ceramic beads
Finishing equipment Rosler indexing satellite table wet blast cabinet RWB 48-4/6 with 4 rotating satellite
work stations
Capacity Process time per batch = 8 min.
Capacity = app. 30 pieces/hour
Titanium Tibia Plates
surface finishing guidebook
16
Titanium/Stainless Steel Hip Stems
Finishing Task The surface must be textured (roughened) for subsequent plasma coating of the stem
section
Shot Blasting Solution Processing in a satellite table air blast machine. Use of aluminum oxide blast media
Finishing equipment Rosler satellite table air blast machine R 1400 S-6 with 6 rotating satellite workstations.
To prevent contamination of the work pieces with ferrous particles all machine areas
coming in contact with the blast media must be made from non-ferrous material.
Capacity About 50 pieces/hour
Finishing Task Cleaning of the work piece surface after lost wax casting. Removal of all residues from
the casting process to achieve a pure metal surface finish. Next manufacturing step:
Machining
Shot Blasting Solution Blast cleaning in a blast cabinet. Use of aluminum oxide blast media. At this early
manufacturing stage the work pieces can gently tumble over each other.
Finishing equipment Rosler airblast cabinet RSKI 1400 equipped with two rotary drums
Capacity Approximately 200 work pieces/hour
Cobalt Chrome/Titanium Knee and Hip Implants
orthopedic implants
17
Titanium Acetabular Cups
Finishing Task Removal of machining lines, high gloss polishing to Rz = 4 micro inches (= 0.1µm). Main
focus is on the concave surface area of the cup.
Mass Finishing Solution Two stage smoothing & polishing process in a rotary vibrator without center dome:
(1) Surface grinding and smoothing with pre-polish plastic media,
(2) Polishing with dry polishing media
Finishing equipment 2 x Rosler special rotary vibrators R 150 DL-2 with 2 vibratory drive motors on the out-
side of the processing bowl
Capacity Processing time stage
(1) surface smoothing: About 10 hours
(2) polishing: About 15 hours
Approximately 24 - 48 pieces/day
Finishing Task Removal of belting lines (220 grit belt), surface smoothing.
Mass Finishing Solution Finishing in a compact drag finisher with fast cutting ceramic media
Finishing equipment Rosler compact drag finisher R 6/1000 SF with 6 rotary work stations (spindles)
Capacity Batch size = 30 pieces; Processing time: About 20 minutes.
Capacity: About 70 – 80 pieces/hour
Titanium Alloy Hip Stems
surface finishing guidebook
18
Ceramic Knee Femorals
Finishing Task Surface smoothing and polishing of ceramic knee femorals
Mass Finishing Solution 2-stage finishing process:
(1) Surface grinding/smoothing with fine grinding ceramic media,
(2) High gloss polishing with porcelain polishing media
Finishing equipment Rosler tub vibrator R 600/1000 TS. Work pieces are mounted to special work piece
fixture that they cannot touch each other during the finishing process
Capacity Batch size = 24 pieces (24 mounted to the fixture) Processing times stage
(1) Grinding & smoothing: About 24 h Processing time stage
(2) Polishing: About 2 h
Capacity: approximately 24 pieces/day
orthopedic implants
19
Orthopedic Implants: A Look Ahead
For more information on orthopedic implant finishing, mass finishing, or shot blasting, visit us at www.rosler.us.
If you would like to send in your parts for FREE process development, please contact us
at 269-441-3000 or [email protected].
Due to their precision, efficiency, and economy, mass finishing
and shot blasting are considered to be an indispensable part
of the finishing process for a wide variety of joint replacement
implants in different manufacturing stages. These flexible ma-
chines can handle everything from general cleaning, deburring,
surface smoothing after casting, forging, stamping, machining,
heat treatment, or surface preparation for polishing or coating,
all the way up to the placement of the final finish on all kinds of
implants and medical devices.
Orthopedic implant manufactures are at the cutting edge of
medical technology. New materials and manufacturing tech-
niques and technologies are constantly evaluated to improve
the performance and longevity of the implants and reduce the
manufacturing cost. Two examples are the increased use of
ceramics as base material or coating, and additive manufactur-
ing. These new materials are generally a lot tougher and harder
than previously used materials, which presents new challenges
for finishing equipment. Suppliers of mass finishing and shot
blasting equipment and consumables have met these chal-
lenges head-on by modifying existing equipment designs or
developing brand-new machinery.
However, the biggest progress has been made in the field of
mass finishing media. There is now media on the market that
allows for the placement a high-gloss finish on components
made from cobalt-chrome, or titanium, after CNC grinding.
And these media even allow mirror polishing of ceramic work
pieces. Likewise, 3D printed components can be finished from
initial surface readings of >2,000 micro inches (50 μm) down to
less than 10 (0.25 μm).
In many cases the optimum manufacturing process includes
multiple production steps. Working with experts from the de-
vice manufacturer and the finishing system supplier will ensure
that the entire production process is considered when finding
the optimum solution. It might be possible to reduce the cycle
time in a previous higher cost production step to lower cost fin-
ishing step without jeopardizing the final product. Manufactur-
ers who understand the rigorous requirements for orthopedic
implants are well suited to help you achieving your goal of a
better finishing process.
surface finishing guidebook
20
Publ
.-Nr.
US.
311.
00 –
Rev
isio
n: 1
2/20
20 –
Spe
cific
atio
ns a
re s
ubje
ct to
cha
nge
with
out n
otic
e.
Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC1551 Denso Road
Battle Creek, MI 49037
Tel: 269-441-3000 Fax: 269-441-3001