NOTICE AND AGENDA OF PUBLIC MEETING

EXECUTIVE ADVISORY

COMMITTEE

9:15 A.M. FEBRUARY 27, 2020

RTC/RFCD ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

600 S. GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY, ROOM 296

LAS VEGAS, NV 89106

(702) 676-1500

This agenda with full backup is available at the Regional Transportation Commission Administration Building, 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy.,

Las Vegas, Nevada; the Regional Transportation Commission’s website, http://www.rtcsnv.com; or by contacting Tammy McMahan at

(702) 676-1538.

THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:

Clark County Government Center 500 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89155

City of Henderson Office of the City Clerk 240 Water Street Henderson, NV 89015

CC Regional Justice Center 200 Lewis Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89155

RTC 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89106

RTC website www.rtcsnv.com Nevada Public Notice website https://notice.nv.gov

BY: ________________________________________________________

DocuSign Envelope ID: A71EB2D2-43D4-496B-93B5-3A8ECFC01E94

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: INITIAL CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE EXECUTIVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

None

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with State of Nevada Open Meeting Law, the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) Executive Advisory Committee shall invite interested persons to make comments. For the initial Citizens Participation, the public should address items on the current agenda. For the final Citizens Participation, interested persons may make comments on matters within the Executive Advisory Committee's jurisdiction, but not necessarily on the current agenda.

No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Executive Advisory Committee can direct that it be placed on a future agenda.

Respectfully submitted,

Non-Consent

_______________________________ JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering

ssa

5067

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0553388F-9295-4845-8661-D2C04BE0F037

Items 2 through 46 are items for possible action. Items 1 and 47 are discussion items and no action

can be taken. Please be advised that the Executive Advisory Committee has the discretion to take items on the agenda out of order, combine two or more agenda items for consideration, remove an item from the agenda, or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda any time.

1. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Executive Advisory Committee can direct that it be placed on a future agenda.

2. APPROVE THE AGENDA (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

CONSENT AGENDA (ITEMS 3 THROUGH 43)

All items marked with asterisks (**) are considered by the Regional Transportation Commission Executive Advisory Committee to be routine and may be acted upon in one motion. However, the Executive Advisory Committee may discuss any consent item individually if requested by a Committee member or a citizen when the consent agenda is considered for approval.

MINUTES

**3. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Meeting of January 30, 2020 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Streets and Highways

**4. ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **5. RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE SUMMARY OF FISCAL ACTIONS RELATED TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **6. APPROVE REVISIONS TO UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS WITH RESPECT TO

CURRENT ACCESSIBILITY BEST PRACTICES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**7. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT 144AG-FTI2; ADAPTIVE SIGNAL PILOT PROJECT (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**8. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 135AH-FTI2; ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: 2019 CLARK COUNTY, RUSSELL ROAD AND EASTERN AVENUE CONSTRUCTION (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**9. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT NO. 1 FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 010N-FTI2; RAINBOW BOULEVARD; ERIE AVENUE TO BLUE DIAMOND ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

DocuSign Envelope ID: A71EB2D2-43D4-496B-93B5-3A8ECFC01E94

**10. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT NO. 1 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL

REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 147C-FTI2;

CACTUS AVENUE, VERONA WOOD STREET TO POLARIS AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE

ACTION)

**11. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT NO. 5 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR

VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 099C-MVFT;

HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD, CHARLESTON BOULEVARD TO LAKE MEAD

BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**12. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY

OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 089P-FTI2; LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD, STEWART AVENUE TO

SAHARA AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**13. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY

OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 223L-FTI2; INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM:

CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AT WESTWIND ROAD AND UPLAND BOULEVARD (FOR

POSSIBLE ACTION)

**14. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY

OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 235A-FTI2; 8TH STREET, BRIDGER AVENUE TO STEWART

AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**15. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY

OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 236A-FTI2; IMPERIAL AVENUE, COMMERCE STREET TO 3RD

STREET (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**16. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT NO. 2 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM MOTOR

VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 228A-MVFT;

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**17. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT

FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY

OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 176J-FTI2; DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS AND

PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**18. RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLE

FUEL TAX DIRECT DISTRIBUTION FUNDS FOR CITY OF BOULDER CITY PROJECT

175T-MVFT; NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION: FISCAL YEAR 2020 CITY OF

BOULDER CITY MAINTENANCE TO AMERICAN PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FOR $439,919.49 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**19. RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM QUESTION 10

FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 215A-Q10; CC-215 BELTWAY TRAIL, CENTENNIAL PARKWAY TO DECATUR BOULEVARD TO CMMMC, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS MULLER CONSTRUCTION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,574,945.41 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**20. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 002AB-FTI; EASTERN

AVENUE, WARM SPRINGS ROAD TO DESERT INN ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **21. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT 003X-FTI; MARYLAND PARKWAY, STEWART AVENUE TO RUSSELL ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**22. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 003Y-FTI; MARYLAND

PARKWAY, RUSSELL ROAD TO TWAIN AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **23. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 006J-FTI; TROPICANA

AVENUE, HUALAPAI WAY TO FORT APACHE ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **24. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 009M-FTI;

CHARLESTON BOULEVARD, RANCHO DRIVE TO MARTIN L. KING BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**25. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 010M-FTI; RAINBOW

BOULEVARD, ERIE AVENUE TO BLUE DIAMOND ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **26. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 051Q-FTI; LAKE

MEAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN COMSTOCK DRIVE AND STELLA LAKE STREET AND HUALAPAI WAY AT CRESTDALE LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**27. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 076V-FTI; CLARK

COUNTY 215, DECATUR BOULEVARD TO NORTH 5TH STREET (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**28. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 089J-FTI;

LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD, TONOPAH AVENUE TO CAREY AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

DocuSign Envelope ID: A71EB2D2-43D4-496B-93B5-3A8ECFC01E94

**29. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 092C-FTI; SUMMERLIN PARKWAY, CC-215 TO US-95 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**30. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 100D-FTI; I-215

INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **31. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 128H-FTI AND 128H-

MVFT; KYLE CANYON INTERCHANGE AT US-95 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**32. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 152D-FTI; I-15 AT STARR AVENUE INTERCHANGE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**33. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 173C-FTI; SAWTOOTH ROADS II (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**34. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 175C-FTI;

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION, GREEN VALLEY PARKWAY TO ARROYO GRANDE BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**35. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 176A-FTI;

DOWNTOWN HENDERSON COMPLETE STREETS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) **36. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT 177A-FTI; INTERSTATE 11, US-95 TO HOOVER DAM BRIDGE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**37. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 179A-FTI; 6TH

STREET, BRIDGER AVENUE TO STEWART AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**38. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 183A-FTI; VALLE

VERDE DRIVE, HORIZON RIDGE PARKWAY TO WARM SPRINGS ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**39. **39. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 187A-FTI; SHADOW

LANE, ALTA DRIVE TO CHARLESTON BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**40. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 188B-FTI;

TROPICAL PARKWAY, HOLLYWOOD TO LINN LANE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

DocuSign Envelope ID: A71EB2D2-43D4-496B-93B5-3A8ECFC01E94

**41. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 192B-FTI; SUNRIDGE HEIGHTS PARKWAY, EXECUTIVE AIRPORT DRIVE TO BERMUDA ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**42. RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT THE MONTHLY ENTITY PROJECT FINANCIAL AND

STATUS REPORTS HAVE BEEN POSTED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA WEBSITE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Planning

**43. RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT THE MONTHLY CAPITAL PROJECT TRACKING REPORT AND THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM PROJECT ACTIVITY

STATUS REPORT HAVE BEEN POSTED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA WEBSITE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

**END OF CONSENT AGENDA**

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Planning 44. APPROVE AMENDMENT CLARK 20-01 TO THE 2017-2040 REGIONAL

TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 45. RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON AMENDMENT CLARK 19-27 TO THE 2017-2040

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

46. REVIEW AND APPROVE THE 2019 ANNUAL REPORT OF CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

47. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: No action can be

taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Executive Advisory Committee can direct that it be placed on a future agenda.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A71EB2D2-43D4-496B-93B5-3A8ECFC01E94

During the initial Citizens Participation, any citizen in the audience may address the Committee on an item featured on the agenda. During the final Citizens Participation, any citizens in the audience may address the Committee on matters within the Committee’s jurisdiction, but not necessarily featured on the agenda. No vote can be taken on a matter not listed on the posted agenda; however, the Committee can direct that the matter be placed on a future agenda. Each citizen must be recognized by the Chair. The citizen is then asked to approach the microphone at the podium, to state his or her name, and to spell the last name for the record. The Chair may limit remarks to three minutes’ duration, if such remarks are disruptive to the meeting or not within the Committee’s jurisdiction. The Regional Transportation Commission keeps the official record of all proceedings of the meeting. In order to maintain a complete and accurate record, copies of documents used during presentations should be submitted to the Recording Secretary. The Regional Transportation Commission appreciates the time citizens devote to be involved in this important process.

In compliance with Nevada Revised Statute 241.035(4), the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada shall create an audio and/or video recording of the meeting and retain such recording(s) for the required period of time.

The Regional Transportation Commission Meeting Room and Conference Room are accessible to

the disabled. Assistive listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. A sign language

interpreter for the deaf will be made available with a forty-eight hour advance request to the

Regional Transportation Commission offices. Phone: 702-676-1500 TDD: 702-676-1834 Any action taken on these items is advisory to the Regional Transportation Commission.

DocuSign Envelope ID: A71EB2D2-43D4-496B-93B5-3A8ECFC01E94

MINUTES

EXECUTIVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

JANUARY 30, 2020 These minutes are prepared in compliance with NRS 241.035. Text is in summarized rather than verbatim format. For complete contents, please refer to

meeting recordings on file at the Regional Transportation Commission.

THIS MEETING WAS PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED

IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ON JANUARY 23, 2020

Clark County Government Center 500 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89155

City of Henderson Office of the City Clerk 240 Water Street Henderson, NV 89015

CC Regional Justice Center 200 Lewis Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89155

RTC 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89106

RTC website www.rtcsnv.com Nevada Public Notice website https://notice.nv.gov

CALL TO ORDER

Mr. Travis Anderson, Chair, called the meeting to order at 9:19 a.m. in Meeting Room 108 of the Regional Transportation Commission Administration Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Travis Anderson, City of Mesquite, Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Nevada Department of Transportation, Vice-Chair Mario Bermudez, Clark County (Alternate) Mike Hudgeons, City of North Las Vegas (Alternate) Keegan Littrell, City of Boulder City Ed McGuire, City of Henderson Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas (Alternate) Joey Paskey, City of Las Vegas (Alternate) Michael Mays, City of Boulder City Richard Secrist, City of Mesquite Michael Tassi, City of Henderson Kaizad Yazdani, Clark County (Alternate) MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Summerfield, City of Las Vegas RTC STAFF: David Swallow, Deputy Chief Executive Officer Chris Figgins, Chief Deputy District Attorney Joe Damiani, Manager of Engineering Craig Raborn, Director of Metropolitan Planning Organization Tammy McMahan, Management Analyst INTERESTED PARTIES: Robert Thompson, Clark County Public Works Aleta Dupree Nissim Ezekiel, Nevada Innovation Center, LLC Gilad Shloosh, Manam Applications Rafe Almagor, Manam Applications Daniel Fazekas, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Tamika Davis-Edwards, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Consent

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 2 of 17

Item: 1. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION Comments: Ms. Aleta Dupree made the following comment: Morning, Committee, Chair Anderson, and members. I will be speaking about posted agenda items. Item #6 Bus Rapid Transit…$5 million, it is important to start this design work. I’m sure you will be seeing a lot more of this. Anything we do on this project must be forward thinking in that its design must allow for the eventual building of light rail. Don’t spend money and redo it later. Moving on to Item #10. That is about the extension of Martin Luther King Boulevard from Oakey Boulevard to DI [Desert Inn Road] I live in that neighborhood. I am not big on highway expansion, but I do believe this extension is necessary. It will make some things a lot…make some things right that were severed with the construction of I-15. I’ve looked at some maps of Highland Road. It will make it easier to travel through my neighborhood by bringing Martin Luther King down. We won’t have so much congestion on Rancho Drive and Sahara Avenue. I live there. I have to deal with this every day. I think we should do this. Item #37 is amending this Clark County plan. Some funding for buses. I spoke about this last month. We don’t want to impact air quality. We have to think about what we are buying. Straight diesel does negatively affect air quality. Think about this in your procurement when we have to replace buses on the Strip. I could live with renewable diesel not out of the ground. You will be seeing more of this. Let’s think about this often. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken.

Item: 2. 2. APPROVE THE AGENDA (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Comments: Mr. Joe Damiani, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), stated the agenda was in order. Motion: Mr. Ed McGuire, City of Henderson, made a motion approve the agenda. Vote/Summary: 12 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Travis Anderson, Vice-Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Mario Bermudez, Mike Hudgeons, Keegan Littrell, Ed McGuire, Johanna Murphy, Joey Paskey, Michael Mays, Richard Secrist, Michael Tassi, and Kaizad Yazdani Nays: None Absent: Robert Summerfield

CONSENT AGENDA (ITEMS 3 THROUGH 34)

All items marked with asterisks (**) are considered by the Regional Transportation Commission Executive Advisory Committee to be routine and may be acted upon in one motion. However, the Executive Advisory Committee may discuss any consent item individually if requested by a Committee member or a citizen when the consent agenda is considered for approval. Item: **3. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Meeting of December 19, 2019 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Item: **4. ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 3 of 17

Item: **5. RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE SUMMARY OF FISCAL ACTIONS RELATED TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Item: **6. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT 003Z-FTI2; MARYLAND PARKWAY BUS RAPID TRANSIT: RUSSELL ROAD TO FREMONT STREET (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **7. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION

FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 046L-FTI2; WARM SPRINGS ROAD, DECATUR BOULEVARD TO DEAN MARTIN DRIVE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **8. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 TO INCREASE FUNDING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR ENGINEERING FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 007Q-FTI2; DECATUR BOULEVARD, TROPICANA AVENUE TO SAHARA AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **9. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 144AF-FTI2; NORTHWEST AREA INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ITS) IMPROVEMENTS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **10. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 222B-FTI2; MARTIN L. KING BOULEVARD EXTENSION, OAKEY BOULEVARD TO DESERT INN ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **11. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL

CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 178T-MVFT; DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROGRAM – PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **12. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 TO INCREASE PROJECT FUNDING FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR ENGINEERING FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 178L-MVFT; DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROGRAM – PHASE 1 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **13. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 4 TO INCREASE PROJECT FUNDING FOR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 135AB3-MVFT; ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: 2019 CITY OF LAS VEGAS MAINTENANCE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 4 of 17

Item **14. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 TO INCREASE PROJECT FUNDING FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 135AE-MVFT; ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: FISCAL YEAR 2020 CITY OF LAS VEGAS MAINTENANCE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **15. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 4 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR ENGINEERING, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 193A-MVFT; BROOKS AVENUE, NORTH FIFTH STREET TO MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **16. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 3 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR ENGINEERING, RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 163B-MVFT; COMMERCE STREET, DUCHESS AVENUE TO CHEYENNE AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **17. RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL

REVENUE INDEXING FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 135AB1-MVFT; ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION 2019; CLARK COUNTY MAINTENANCE TO LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION FOR $9,780,000.00 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **18. RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL

REVENUE INDEXING FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 135AB1-MVFT; ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION 2019 CLARK COUNTY MAINTENANCE, TO LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION FOR $6,600,000.00 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **19. RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR

VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUND FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 211B2-MVFT; TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM: FISCAL YEAR 2019 TO CG&B ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR $1,999,992,71 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **20. RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR

VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 051M-MVFT; LAMB BOULEVARD, CHARLESTON BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS TO LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION FOR $6,543,210.00 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **21. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 010H-SB5; RAINBOW

BOULEVARD, CACTUS AVENUE TO BLUE DIAMOND ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **22. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 033Q-FTI; JONES

BOULEVARD, BLUE DIAMOND ROAD TO WINDMILL LANE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 5 of 17

Item: **23. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 178D-FTI; CITY

OF LAS VEGAS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STREET LIGHTING UPGRADES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **24. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 010J-Q10;

RAINBOW BOULEVARD, WESTCLIFF DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **25. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 045C-MVFT;

OGDEN UNDERPASS; CITY PARKWAY TO MAIN STREET (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Item: **26. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 157E2-Q10;

ENTITY RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Item: **27. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 142R3-MVFT;

ENTITY NON-PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPENSES FISCAL YEAR 2019 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **28. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF BOULDER CITY PROJECT 175N6-MVFT;

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION: 2018 CITY OF BOULDER CITY MAINTENANCE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **29. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF BOULDER CITY PROJECT 135AA6-

MVFT; ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: 2018 CITY OF BOULDER CITY MAINTENANCE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **30. APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF BOULDER CITY PROJECT 175Q1-MVFT;

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION: FISCAL YEAR 2019 CITY OF BOULDER CITY MAINTENANCE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **31. RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT THE MONTHLY ENTITY PROJECT FINANCIAL AND

STATUS REPORTS HAVE BEEN POSTED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA WEBSITE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **32. RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT THE MONTHLY CAPITAL PROJECT TRACKING

REPORT AND THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM PROJECT ACTIVITY STATUS REPORT HAVE BEEN POSTED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA WEBSITE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **33. RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON AMENDMENT CLARK 19-27 TO THE 2017-2040 REGIONAL

TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Item: **34. RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITY OF THE SOUTHERN

NEVADA STRONG REGIONAL PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Comments: Mr. Joe Damiani, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), stated there were no

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 6 of 17 changes to the Consent Agenda. Motion: Mr. Ed McGuire, City of Henderson, made a motion approve the Consent Agenda. Vote/Summary: 12 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Travis Anderson, Vice-Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Mario Bermudez, Mike Hudgeons, Keegan Littrell, Ed McGuire, Johanna Murphy, Joey Paskey, Michael Mays, Richard Secrist, Michael Tassi, and Kaizad Yazdani Nays: None Absent: Robert Summerfield Item: 35. APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE RTC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. Joe Damiani, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), recounted that at the Executive Advisory Committee (EAC) December 19, 2019 meeting, a City of Las Vegas representative provided a presentation regarding the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidelines. The representative touched upon the benefits the guidelines might afford if included in the RTC Policies and Procedures. The RTC meeting facilitators had asked the EAC to consider this matter and make a decision when the item was brought before the Committee again. Mr. Damiani then stated the RTC recommended the reference to the NACTO guidelines be placed in the RTC Policies and Procedures Design Criteria subsection 3.2.1. Motion: Mr. Mike Hudgeons, City of North Las Vegas, made a motion to approve. Vote/Summary: 12 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Travis Anderson, Vice-Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Mario Bermudez, Mike Hudgeons, Keegan Littrell, Ed McGuire, Johanna Murphy, Joey Paskey, Michael Mays, Richard Secrist, Michael Tassi, and Kaizad Yazdani Nays: None Absent: Robert Summerfield Item: 36. RECEIVE A PRESENTATION ON PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY PROVIDED BY MANAM APPLICATIONS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. Joe Damiani, Manager of Engineering with the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), informed meeting attendees that Manam Applications (Manam) representatives would be making a presentation regarding the company’s Pavement Management Systems (PMS). Information about Manam Applications

Mr. Nissim Ezekiel, Co-Founder of the Nevada Innovation Center, noted that Manam Applications is an established company that has been operating for more than 10 years. The company has undertaken deployments in Israel, Eastern Europe, and, recently, in the city of Shanghai in China. He further stated Manam is participating in a joint venture with AviSight, a drone company based in Henderson, Nevada. This particular undertaking involves research and development to conduct drone-based inspections of bridges. Manam Applications and AviSight have been discussing with the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) the feasibility of a pilot program of parallel inspections utilizing drones to inspect

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 7 of 17 bridges. Manam Applications Pavement Management Systems

Following a detailed PowerPoint Presentation [attached}, Mr. Gilad Shloosh, Founder and CEO of Manam Applications, discussed Manam’s Pavement Management Systems technology to collect data for road networks and analyzing that information to create plans for road networks. PMS Technology Overview

Manam Applications PMS is an integrated arrangement. The system assists pavement engineers in the presentation of road network inspections, evaluation of pavement condition, creation of both routine and preventative work plans, and collection of inventory. Ms. Shloosh characterized the technology as solid, reliable, and proven. Manam’s Road Survey Unit (RSU)

Mr. Shloosh expressed that surveys of roadway pavement may be conducted, generally speaking, by a person driving along roadways and he or she physically examines the road. This person would record data on a laptop, tablet, or mobile device. He set forth that Manam has developed a new technique utilizing road survey units (RSU). These vehicles are equipped with GPS, high-definition cameras, a Distance Measuring Instrument (DMI), and numerous other sensors that gather data on current road conditions. The RSU’s Video Survey Systems provides a 360-degree view of the roadway being surveyed. The vehicle can be operated like any other vehicle. Network Level: Condition Analysis I Thematic View

The Manam CEO went on to explain the language the company’s uses to rank pavement conditions. He stated pavement condition is expressed on a range from 100 to zero with “100” representing a road in perfect shape and “0” representing a completely failed road. In Manam Applications’s rankings, below 40 is a failing road. 5-Year Budget Plan – Improve pavement condition index (PCI) 0.5 percent per year

Next, Mr. Shloosh noted that with the Manam software, the user will receive data regarding pavement defects and the traffic traversing roadways. The user can download information regarding roadway budgets on the software platform and use relevant factors to prioritize and rank roads in terms of repair and/or maintenance. City of Reno, Nevada Pilot Main Results

Mr. Shloosh informed meeting attendees that Manam Applications and AviSight had been invited by the Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County (RTC Washoe) to conduct a road survey of a pilot zone in the City of Reno, Nevada (Reno) and surroundings. The pilot zone covered 110 mile-lanes. Mr. Shloosh plays video of the footage captured by a Manam Applications RSU, the data collected, and scenarios. Mr. Rafe Almagor, Business Development Manager with Manam Applications, related some experiences and insights related to the Reno pilot. He recalled an individual who believed a certain roadway was in good condition throughout the thoroughfare, but saw data that disproved his assumption and indicated pavement failure starting at a certain area. Furthermore, Mr. Almagor shared that RTC Washoe had been provided with 100-percent visual displays of the roadways survey. The visual displays, included, but were not limited, road signs, curbs, and painting on the roadway. The Manam Applications Business Development Manager went on to say 1,700 miles of roadway had been surveyed as part of this pilot. The

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 8 of 17 company would suggest additional surveys to cover this area be undertaken. After the entire roadway network is covered, follow-up evaluations could be carried out every other year or every two years. Furthermore, he noted if a new roadway is constructed, it should be immediately surveyed so there is a knowledge of its initial condition. This information would be useful for quality control in terms of maintenance. Questions and Answers

Mr. David Swallow, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, inquired regarding the amount of time to collect the data for RTC Washoe, and develop and provide a report. Mr. Shloosh first explained the process. He stated that Manam Applications recommended a survey of the full network be undertaken every year for some period of time. After a few years, Manam Applications would suggest that a survey be undertaken perhaps every second year. For the RTC Washoe pilot conducted in Reno, Manam Applications surveyed 1,700 miles. This effort took approximately three months. The company stopped the data collection after winter. The analysis of data and creation of a work plan took approximately five months. Mr. Damiani asked how many directional miles were involved in this pilot program. Mr. Almagor answered that the pilot focused upon 110 directional mile-lanes. Mr. Shloosh added to this statement, explaining if there are two carriageways, the mile-lanes would include both ways. He further expressed that if there is one carriageway, the mile-lanes include only one way. He pointed out that Manam Applications’s 360-deegree camera enables the viewer to see both lanes. Mr. Almagor noted this is the 100-percent visuals Mr. Shloosh referenced when discussing the RSU. Mr. Ed McGuire, City of Henderson (Henderson), shared that Henderson personnel have been discussing a pavement condition data collection project. He stated the municipality is working on a Request for Proposal (RFP) for this effort. In response, Mr. Damiani mentioned the RTC would be disseminating an RFP regarding a pilot program that would involve the use of LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) for assets and pavement assessment. The agency is planning to structure the RFP such that the pilot program could contract with “X” amount of firms to carry out the work. The agency would verify the results and could select one or more firms to cover the Las Vegas Valley. Mr. Swallow sought confirmation that the pilot program would involve detailed data processing related to pavement assessment. Mr. Damiani answered in the affirmative, noting the aim is to have a comprehensive data collection, data processing, and web user interface technology related to the roadway network. Mr. Shloosh commented that LIDAR can create huge files. In his opinion, a user can attain more valuable information from inventory data collection. He described inventory data as tending to be easier to adjust and create products. He characterized LIDAR files as challenging to manipulate and create products since the files are so large. Mr. Shloosh noted that Manam Applications can work with both kinds of program and separate out LIDAR and inventory data collection though. Mr. Damiani concluded the discussion by stating that the item was intended to be informational and no action was required. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 9 of 17

Item: 37. APPROVE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT CLARK 19-29 TO THE

2017-2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. Craig Raborn, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), stated Clark Amendment 19-29 adds funds in Federal Fiscal Years 2020 2023 for the continued maintenance and operation of the RTC transit system. He informed meeting attendees that full details were set forth in the item’s backup. Mr. Raborn went on to say that due to the significant nature of the changes and the Public Participation Plan the agency is now following, the RTC is holding 21-day public comment period that started on January 16, 2020 and ends on February 5, 2020. He noted the public comment made about this item during the first Citizens Participation would be recorded by the RTC’s Metropolitan Planning Organization staff. Mr. Raborn mentioned the amendment is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan and does not impact on air quality. He concluded his statement by relating RTC staff recommended approval, pending the closure of the public comment period. Motion: Mr. Ed McGuire, City of Henderson, made a motion to approve pending the closure of the public comment period. Vote/Summary: 12 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Travis Anderson, Vice-Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Mario Bermudez, Mike Hudgeons, Keegan Littrell, Ed McGuire, Johanna Murphy, Joey Paskey, Michael Mays, Richard Secrist, Michael Tassi, and Kaizad Yazdani Nays: None Absent: Robert Summerfield Item: 38. RECEIVE A FINAL REPORT ON THE LIVABLE CENTERS STUDY FOR THE DEER

SPRINGS DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Presentation on the Livable Centers Study for the Deer Springs District

Concept Background Mr. Daniel Fazekas, Senior Transportation Planner for Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) provided background on this project. He stated the Livable Centers Study is a pilot program that was proposed by the RTC more than two years ago. The RTC envisioned two outcomes for this study. Regarding the first, the agency saw the program as a means to scale down Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Southern Nevada Strong (SNS) visions and goals on the level of a jurisdiction and a specific neighborhood. Regarding the second outcome, the RTC hoped to empower a jurisdiction to serve as the project manager and, in this capacity, develop and implement the study. The RTC would undertake oversight responsibilities. Selection Process Next, Mr. Fazekas detailed the selection process. The RTC created an application, developed a selection process including the formation of a selection committee, and called for partners. The local jurisdictions that applied had to identify areas in the jurisdictions for consideration. The applicants were asked to show how the project area is aligned with the RTP and SNS and Livable Center goals. A selection committee chose the City of North Las Vegas (North Las Vegas) proposal. The Livable Centers Study for the Deer Springs District (District) presentation was provided to the City of North Las Vegas City Council on January 15, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 10 of 17

Livable Centers Overview Then, Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, provided a presentation regarding the Livable Centers Study for the Deer Springs District. This presentation was included in the agenda packet. Ms. Murphy described “Livable Centers” as a planning strategy intended to improve the quality of life in a neighborhood and specific area. The intended outcome of this strategy is to create neighborhoods that are vibrant, walkable communities that offer increased transportation options, encourage healthy lifestyles, and provide improved access to jobs and services. Deer Springs District Boundaries Ms. Murphy informed meeting attendees that the Deer Springs District is a two-and-a-half mile area. The boundaries are as follows: Commerce Street to Walnut Road, which is just past Pecos Road. The area stretches across Centennial Parkway to the 215 Parkway and on to Deer Springs Way that connects to North 5th Street corridor in downtown North Las Vegas. In an area east of Pecos Road, the Veterans Administration (VA) Healthcare System is located. In an area west of the VA Medical Center, federal authorities have designated a 158-acre site as a Job Creation Zone (JCZ). She pointed out that a significant amount of undeveloped land was situated in the Deer Springs District. This land provided opportunities to incorporate Livable Centers concepts. Project Goals for the Deer Springs District Ms. Murphy continued, discussing the project goals for the Deer Springs District as follows:

Create Value – The plan is to coordinate public investments in infrastructure, parks, and economic development that attract private investment in housing, jobs, and retail development.

Build Resilience - The District will be resilient to economic and environmental challenges. Make Connections - The District will be connected by streets, trails, sidewalks, bicycle paths, and

future transit options. Prioritize Health – The plan is to build upon the unique assets of the VA Hospital and the North

Las Vegas Job Creation Zone. Development with Distinction – North Las Vegas will aim to design the District so that it is a

distinct destination within the City of North Las Vegas and the Las Vegas Valley. Summary of Engagement Ms. Murphy went on to talk about the Deer Springs District community engagement process. She described it as a comprehensive endeavor involving the convening of a stakeholder advisory group, hosting public workshops, and participation in strategic community events. Engagement activities were held in the District and throughout the municipality and included pop-up events. Ms. Murphy stated the goal was to communicate with both current and future residents to solicit their feedback. She also noted North Las Vegas hosted a Job Creation Zone Forum in January 2019. This forum was open to the public and specific persons were invited to conceptualize a vision for the JCZ. Concept 1 Next, Ms. Murphy described the District’s “Concept 1.” For this concept, the focus was on developing strategies related to land use and transportation, recreational opportunities, and branding. Regarding recreational opportunities, North Las Vegas wants to ensure there is extensive open space. She cited the example of the North Las Vegas’s future Sky View Park. In addition, Ms. Murphy mentioned the municipality would endeavor to make the District identifiable in terms of branding.

Concept 2 Ms. Murphy then discussed the District’s “Concept 2.” She touched upon the aforementioned Job Creation Zone Forum, noting a concept plan was developed that builds on the VA Hospital and other

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 11 of 17 options involving medical care and research. Furthermore, the City of North Las Vegas and stakeholders involved in this effort focused on urban design and walkable areas. As North Las Vegas personnel examined other job creation zones across the country, staff members realized that it was crucial for a JCZ to be walkable for future employees and visitors. As such, the staff members are planning to incorporate open spaces throughout the JCZ. In addition, trails from the 215 Beltway will connect with the northern end of JCZ and the JCZ will feature a walkable connection to the future Sky View Park. Ms. Murphy concluded her presentation and welcomed questions. Mr. Fazekas commented that the Livable Centers Study was an ongoing program. He reported the RTC had selected the City of Henderson (Henderson) for the second phase of the study. Henderson’s study would be in the area of the Galleria Mall and a property located on Galleria Drive. Mr. Fazekas stated this phase had launched in late fall 2019 and is expected to be completed by the end of 2020. He announced that the study would have a third phase and the RTC is planning to issue a call for projects/jurisdictional partners in the next six to nine months. Mr. Craig Raborn, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern, informed the Executive Advisory Committee that no action was required for this informational item. Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 39. APPROVE SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURE TARGETS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Correction of Listing in Item’s Backup

Mr. Craig Raborn, Director of Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), with the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), first informed meeting attendees that a correction on the second page of the backup (Agenda Item Development Report) for Item #39 was in order. He specified that this matter concerned a listing that read “2021 RTC Safety Targets.” Mr. Raborn stated it should read “2020 RTC Safety Targets.” Safety Performance Measure Targets Presentation

Following a detailed PowerPoint presentation [included in the agenda packet], Mr. Chin-Cheng Chen, RTC Principal Transportation Planner, further addressed this item. He stated the agency had been setting safety performance measure targets for the past two years, adopting targets set by the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT or Transportation Department). He announced that the RTC would establish the agency’s own targets in 2020. Transportation Performance Management Development

Mr. Chen noted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (Map-21) defined seven national goals that related to the first element of transportation performance management (TPM). These goals should be primarily achieved through the performance-based planning and programming (PBPP) processes. Per federal regulations described in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) and 23 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) 490.209 (c), states and metropolitan areas must comply with rules related to TPM. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines transportation performance management as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to achieve the national performance goals.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 12 of 17

Transportation Performance Management Elements

The RTC Principal Transportation Planner explained transportation performance management is based on six elements. They all work together to support performance based management of the transportation system. He touched upon these six elements as follows:

1. Seven national goals 2. Performance measures – Congress defined a set of performance measure areas for each goal. 3. Targets – State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and Metropolitan Planning Organizations

are required to set targets for each measure. 4. Plans – The measures and targets are required to be incorporated into specific transportation plans,

both the federally required transportation planning process and specific processes for several program areas

5. Reports- State DOTs, MPOs, and the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) are required to report on transportation performance.

6. Accountability and transparency – This process involves reviewing progress on targets and providing reports to the USDOT.

Seven National Goals Established by MAP-21

Mr. Chen proceeded to elaborate upon each of the above-mentioned elements. He listed the seven national goals as follows:

1. Safety 2. Infrastructure condition 3. Congestion reduction 4. System reliability 5. Freight movement and economic 6. Environmental sustainability

7. Reduced project delivery delays FHWA Performance Measures

The RTC Principal Transportation Planner noted that each of the seven goals has performance measures. He provided the general categorization of those measures as follows:

1. Safety 2. Pavement condition 3. Bridge condition 4. Systems performance 5. Freight movement 6. Congestion mitigation and air quality

Performance Measures: Safety and Details on Composition Next, Mr. Chen discussed the components of the safety performance measuring noting that it was comprised of five elements: number of fatalities; rate of fatalities per 100 million Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT); number of serious injuries (An example of a serious injury would be an incident whereby a person is incapacitated and has to be provided medical care.); rate of serious injuries per 100 Million VMT; and number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries. NDOT’s 2020 Safety Measure Targets

Mr. Chen reiterated that the RTC had adopted NDOT safety measure targets for the past two years.

Nevada Fatality Historical Trends Interim Goals to 2030 Referring to a graph displayed on a slide, Mr. Chen explained the Nevada fatality historical trends. He

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 13 of 17 pointed out that this information was based on a five-year rolling average for the period of 2004 through 2008. NDOT took the data from 2008 as the baseline. In light of Nevada’s Strategic Highway Safety (SHSP) Zero Fatalities initiative, the Transportation Department’s goal is to reduce the number of fatalities by 3.1 percent each year with the aim that the number of fatalities would be reduced to 195 by 2030. Mr. Chen expressed that the ultimate hope is that there would be no future fatalities. Performance-Based Planning and Programming: Target-Setting Coordination

MPO Target Setting The RTC Principal Transportation Plan stated an MPO can establish its own quantifiable performance targets. As such, the RTC is choosing to adopt the agency’s own targets in 2020. Mr. Chen informed meeting attendees the RTC would follow NDOT’s methodology, but use regional data and urbanized area crash data supplied by the state’s Transportation Department to set targets and monitor regional progress. In this way, the agency would have the flexibility establish regional performance targets reflective of the regional condition. Safety Performance Measure (PM) 1: Fatalities Mr. Chen set forth the RTC has formulated a five-year rolling average with a high of 249. Keeping in mind the aforementioned methodology, the aim is to reduce that number by half to 124. The RTC will follow the same methodology for Safety PM 2: Fatality Rates; Safety PM 3: Serious Injuries; Safety PM 4: Serious Injury Rate; and Safety PM 5: Non-Motorized Fatalities. NDOT and RTC Safety Targets

Next, the RTC Principal Transportation Planner displayed a slide featuring a table comparing the NDOT and RTC safety targets related to the safety performance measure. 2020 RTC Targets for Reporting

Mr. Chen went on to talk about next steps. He stated the RTC would be allocating funding in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to promote achievements of the performance targets in the plan. The agency would develop annual reports to the USDOT and conduct annual re-evaluation of the targets. Questions and Answers

Chair Travis Anderson, City of Mesquite (Mesquite), asked how the RTC’s plan to set safety performance measure targets would affect work on the jurisdictions’ projects. Mr. Raborn responded that elaboration on the next steps regarding the development process for the safety performance measures targets may be instructive. Mr. Raborn followed by outlining the process. Once the RTC set targets, the agency will commence work on project selection to meet the targets. This will be part of the next Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) development process. The next RTP must be adopted by February 2021. As it stands, the RTC may carry out a project selection arrangement like that for the Fuel Revenue Indexing (FRI) project selection. For FRI, projects were identified as likely to enhance safety or reduce congestion. The RTC may use the same sort of classification scheme in order to meet the TPM goals and targets. Mr. Raborn added the RTC may assess projects using the FHWA proven countermeasures to determine how well the projects align with those methods and how the projects should perform in terms of meeting the targets over time. This arrangement would not affect project selection for RTP in the current cycle. Mr. Raborn continued, saying the RTC’s Metropolitan Planning Organization is required by federal regulations to undertake Performance-Based Program Planning. As such, the MPO will set targets and

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 14 of 17 work with the jurisdictions to help meet the PBPP targets. The RTC will report the results to the USDOT and carry out re-evaluation of the targets on a yearly basis. Mr. Joe Damiani, RTC Manager of Engineering, added to Mr. Raborn’s statement, mentioning that when the RTC’s Capital Improvements Program is being formulated there will be some items for the MPO to complete and these matters will be transferred to the MPO for management and included in the TIP. Next, Chair Anderson noted that the RTC is setting low numbers for the number of facilities and he wondered how this might impact the jurisdictions. He noted that this goal is laudable. That being said, he wondered if the City of Mesquite was proposing a roadway project for the RTP, if the work may not be acceptable since it could potentially raise the risk of fatalities. Mr. Raborn responded that it is highly unlikely the selection of projects receiving federal funds would adversely affect Mesquite in the manner Chair Anderson hypothesized. He explained safety is not the only factor. There are other factors incorporated into the performance measures including, but not limited to, connectivity, congestion management, maintenance, and air quality improvements. In order to secure federal dollars, the RTC’s MPO needs to show projects that could conceivably achieve the impacts the region has made priorities. This tends to results in the funding of projects distributed across the entire region. Chair Anderson then asked if the target-setting process was strictly related to securing federal monies. Mr. Raborn clarified that the process concerned the setting of regional targets the region wants to achieve. He went on to say discussion regarding the development process for the Regional Transportation Plan may be helpful to illustrate the point. He outlined the RTC’s formulation of the upcoming RTP. For this work, more regionally significant projects will be included. The RTC’s MPO will assess this work. To illustrate how the assessment might work, Mr. Raborn set forth a hypothetical. The RTC’s MPO sets a target of reducing the number of fatalities to 20 in the next five years. MPO staff members analyze the crash modification factors for all RTP projects and finds that fatalities may only be reduced by 15. The agency and/or the jurisdictions may have to point out how other targets are achieved with the proposed work. Vice-Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Nevada Department of Transportation, mentioned that the federal authorities did have penalty if a state or MPO does not meet the established targets or if the entities do not set targets that the relevant federal authorities think are achievable. In her opinion, the punitive aspect was relatively soft, The penalty is that a state or MPO cannot transfer Highway State Improvement Program dollars. Vice-Chair Rosenberg noted NDOT receives approximately $20 million in HSIP funds. Vice-Chair Rosenberg then expressed the state has to set targets based on a number of performance measures. The goal of Performance-Based Program Planning is to attempt to cover all of the performance measures and the balance efforts related to the same. Vice-Chair Rosenberg continued, adding that NDOT and RTC were attempting to move away from focusing on project prioritization connected to specific sources of funding. These entities will consider regional priorities and allocate monies for the significant matters. Jurisdictions would propose projects they believe would meet regional priorities and NDOT and the RTC will examine the work through the prism of the RTP process. Vice-Chair Rosenberg noted that multiple funding sources may be used to fund RTP projects. Chair Anderson thanked both Mr. Raborn and Vice-Chair Rosenberg for the in-depth explanations. Mr. Ed McGuire, City of Henderson, believed he understood the methodology behind the number of fatalities per hundred rate. With that in mind, he wondered if it is possible the rate per hundred could fall,

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 15 of 17 but the numbers of fatalities could still increase because of population growth in the Las Vegas Valley. Under that scenario, the rate of fatalities does fall, but the community cannot achieve zero fatalities. Mr. Raborn shared the agency is incorporating data regarding the projected growth of vehicle miles traveled as personnel set targets for reducing the fatality rates. Mr. David Swallow, RTC Deputy Chief Executive Officer, asked Mr. Chen to explain why the targets for the state and the RTC are so different. Mr. Chen explained the difference is that the state targets were based upon the entire state’s crash records and the RTC is using Clark County’s crash records. He added the methodology is identical. Mr. Swallow noted the crash rates for the entire state may have been higher that the crash rates for Clark County. He thought the state likely parsed out crash data particular to Clark County. Mr. Chen commented NDOT looked at the entire state including Clark County. Mr. Raborn concluded the discussion by saying the RTC is requesting action for this item. Motion: Mr. Ed McGuire, City of Henderson, made a motion to follow staff recommendation. Vote/Summary: 12 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Travis Anderson, Vice-Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Mario Bermudez, Mike Hudgeons, Keegan Littrell, Ed McGuire, Johanna Murphy, Joey Paskey, Michael Mays, Richard Secrist, Michael Tassi, and Kaizad Yazdani Nays: None Absent: Robert Summerfield Item: 40. APPROVE THE FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM –

AMENDMENT TWO (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. Craig Raborn, Director of Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), with the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), addressed this item following a detailed PowerPoint presentation [included in the agenda packet] Overview

Mr. Raborn explained that the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is the RTC’s biennial statement of work identifying the planning priorities and activities to be carried out within the agency’s MPO. He further stated MPOs are required to develop UPWPs to govern work programs for the expenditure of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) planning funds. Mr. Raborn shared that the UPWP has to be modified when significant changes are made to projects and when project funding changes occur. 2020-2021 UPWP Amendment Two Mr. Raborn went to discuss the UPWP Amendment Two in detail as follows:

Adds funding for the General Outreach task to conduct surveys about transportation-related issues Amends the Planning Administration task to clarify RTC membership in national membership

organizations, and adds funding to support the full range of activities required for multimodal transportation planning

Adds additional software program as potential programs to be utilized to enhance transportation planning

Adds a new project to perform land use and transportation scenario planning

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 16 of 17

202-2021 UPWP Amendment Two

The MPO Director noted that Southern Nevada Strong (SNS) is now formally a part of the MPO. The RTC’s MPO administers the SNS on behalf of the region and, as such, SNS needed to be incorporated into the UPWP. The RTC will add Task 501 Regional Policy Plan Administration that lists projects that are intended to facilitate that inclusion. Mr. Raborn set forth those projects: Regional Plan Core Administration, Regional Plan Updates, Indicator Tracking and Mapping, Community Planning Academy, Outreach and Communications, and Annual SNS Implementation Report. In addition to Task 501, the RTC would add Task 601: Regional Planning and Research that features actual development plans, studies, and reports to help provide information to stakeholders and the region as a whole. This work would entail a Future Housing Inventory and Needs Analysis, Extreme Heat Events Coordinated Response Study, Inventory of Regional Sustainability Planning Tools and Techniques, and the Tree Canopy Social Equity Impacts Research Report. 2020 2021 UPWP Amendment Two Funding Mr. Raborn shared that the total funding resulting from Amendment Two is an increase of nearly $800,000 in Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021. This amount would ultimately be reimbursed by the Federal Highway Administration. To explain why the FHWA would cover certain planning costs, he pointed out some planning matters have a nexus with transportation. Mr. Raborn went on to say the RTC has a funding buffer and the increase was not expected to be problematic for the agency prior to the remuneration. He noted that this matter had been presented to the Metropolitan Planning Subcommittee and discussed with Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition. Mr. Raborn concluded his statement by relating RTC staff recommended approval. Motion: Ms. Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas, made a motion to approve. Vote/Summary: 12 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Travis Anderson, Vice-Chair Sondra Rosenberg, Mario Bermudez, Mike Hudgeons, Keegan Littrell, Ed McGuire, Johanna Murphy, Joey Paskey, Michael Mays, Richard Secrist, Michael Tassi, and Kaizad Yazdani Nays: None Absent: Robert Summerfield Item: 41. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION Comments: Ms. Aleta Dupree made the following comments: As we get ready to close out, a lot of interesting things were said today. Connectivity is important, especially in light of a new project around Rancho Drive and Sahara Avenue. In my 17 years of living here, I have noticed that connectivity between the east and west sides of town can be difficult because we are bisected by an interstate highway and a railroad. Large bridges go over those, but aren’t conductive to small mobility like electric bicycles, regular bicycles and scooters. The scooters from Lime, Bird, and other companies. It can be hard to navigate the crossings on small vehicles. I have experienced this on the Sahara flyover. Looking over the matters of safety that were discussed today, we should take account grade crossing on railroads. You don’t hear about it much, but there are grade crossings for railroads here. There are a number of trains that traverse this town. Keep it in mind. RTC buses go over railroad crossings in a number of places. As we plan forward, it’s important to build a city of connectivity and keep air quality in mind. Thank you.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

Minutes-Executive Advisory Committee Meeting of January 30, 2020 Page 17 of 17 Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken.

ADJOURNMENT

The meeting adjourned at 10:27 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Tammy McMahan, Recording & Transcription Secretary

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7A3E5B44-C67E-4BE3-8019-8B0671DCF49A

1

Gilad Shloosh, B.Sc.‐ Pavement Designer

Pavement Management System 

RTC WASHOE Pilot Project Results

RTC‐EAC Meeting‐Jan. 30. 2020 – Agenda Item 36

Manam Applications Ltd located in Caesarea, Israel is a software company. Weprovide advanced solutions and services for condition inspections and data analysisand economic- engineering insights for road networks and infrastructures:1. Road Inspections- road survey unit, data and network analysis, rehabilitation plans2. Bridge Inspections- drone based inspections

Our team owns unique capabilities and consists experts in various fields: CivilEngineering, Code/Algorithmic- Software engineers, Mathematics, GIS(Geographers), IT (Information Technology), Field Surveying.Manam has been doing road and bridge surveys with advances sensors (locationbased- DGPS, DMI, multi HD cameras, Lasers, LIDAR) in the collection of road andbridge networks for the last 10 years.

Our clients include both leading national and international firms: IsraeliDOT (Department of Transportation “Netivey-Israel”), the Ministry Of Defense, IsraelRailway, Municipalities of Tel-Aviv, Jerusalem and others, Reno, Nevada (RTCWashoe), Nevada DOT, World Bank (Africa, Asia), TAHAL, RCC Nigeria, SBI andmany more.

About MANAM Applications

2

ABOUT THE PILOT

A joint team of Manam Applications Ltd

and Avisight Inc. (from Henderson, NV)

was invited by RTC Washoe to conduct

road surveys of a pilot zone in the city

of Reno, and surrounds.

The survey of pilot zone included 110

mile‐lanes.

3

Manam™  PMS

Manam™PMS assists pavement engineers in:

1. Presentation of road network inspections.

2. Evaluating pavement condition,

3. Work plan creation‐ routine / preventive

4. Collect inventory: road sign, traffic lights, hydrants,

bus stops, more

5. The technology is solid, reliable and proven.

* Manam™PMS is parametric system. All features can defined.

6

Current Road Condition Surveys

1|Walking Visual Condition Survey

2| Wind Shield Inspections

4

Manam’s Road Survey Unit (RSU)

HD Cameras 3 front, 1/2 rear

GPSAll surveys are Geo‐referenced

8

PILOT | RSU – DMI calibration

5

9

Reno, Pilot Q4/2019

10

Inside the RSU – DURING THE SURVEY

6

11

Video Log ‐ 360o view

Pavement Condition Index‐ PCI

The PCI score (ASTM D6433 ) is calculated based on video pavement distress survey analysis. 

PCI score ranges from 100 to 0, usually  divided to the following groups:

40‐055‐4070‐5585‐70100‐85PCI Score

FailBadFAIRGoodVery Good

Service Level

7

Distress analysis Studio

A 3D analysis studio, Pavement Distress analysis stage

Manam™PMS ‐ Panoramic View

8

RTC WASHOE‐Distress analysis

Moving Point

Network Level: Condition Analysis | Thematic View

Very Good

Good

FAIR

Poor

Very Poor

PCI

9

Annual Work Plan Results

gRoad sections‐ candidates for maintenance, according to tree of decisions. 

5 years budget plan – improve PCI 0.5 pt/year

10

HANDS ONPILOT SAMPLE

DISCUSSION

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AMENDMENTS PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ADOPT AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

None

BACKGROUND:

The following amendments to the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) are being requested. The fiscal actions associated with these projects are detailed later in this agenda.

Project No. Fund Entity Year Programmed Year Amended Funds Available236A-FTI2 FRI Extension Las Vegas Not Programmed 2019-2020 Yes089P-FTI2 FRI Extension Las Vegas 2026-2027 2019-2020 Yes

These amendments have no adverse impacts to the associated CIP and, therefore, are recommended for approval.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

6913

DocuSign Envelope ID: A7D5AFF2-BCF8-432E-A440-B1FC369254FB

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FISCAL ACTIONS PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE SUMMARY OF FISCAL ACTIONS RELATED TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: This agenda item addresses requested changes in funding associated with the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) administered by the Streets and Highways Department of the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada. The attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B list requests for new projects and/or deletions of closed projects from the adopted CIP. Respectfully submitted, _______________________________ JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

6912

DocuSign Envelope ID: A7D5AFF2-BCF8-432E-A440-B1FC369254FB

EXHIBIT A - SUMMARY OF FISCAL ACTIONS

$559,514.61

ENTITY PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME ACTION AMOUNT

CC 099C-MVFT HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD: CHARLESTON BLVD TO LAKE MEAD BLVD 5TH SUPPLEMENTAL $750,000.00

CLV 228A-MVFT CITYWIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL $300,000.00

CLV 128H-MVFT KYLE CANYON INTERCHANGE AT US-95 CLOSEOUT ($490,485.39)

($28,916,704.63)

ENTITY PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME ACTION AMOUNT

CC 002AB-FTI EASTERN AVENUE: WARM SPRINGS RD TO DESERT INN RD CLOSEOUT ($629,246.07)

CC 003Y-FTI MARYLAND PARKWAY: RUSSELL RD TO TWAIN AVE CLOSEOUT ($843,983.59)

CC 006J-FTI TROPICANA AVENUE: HUALAPAI WAY TO FORT APACHE RD CLOSEOUT ($3,945,649.69)

CC 010M-FTI RAINBOW BOULEVARD: ERIE AVE TO BLUE DIAMOND RD CLOSEOUT ($1,649,410.53)

CC 076V-FTI CLARK COUNTY 215: DECATUR BLVD TO NORTH 5TH ST CLOSEOUT ($1,986,483.77)

CLV 009M-FTI CHARLESTON BOULEVARD: RANCHO DR TO MLK BLVD CLOSEOUT ($534,020.95)

CLV 051Q-FTI LAKE MEAD BLVD: COMSTOCK DR/STELLA LAKE ST: HUALAPAI WAY CLOSEOUT ($735,597.46)

CLV 092C-FTI SUMMERLIN PARKWAY: CC-215 TO US-95 CLOSEOUT ($413,980.74)

CLV 128H-FTI KYLE CANYON INTERCHANGE AT US-95 CLOSEOUT ($418,145.80)

CLV 179A-FTI 6TH STREET: BRIDGER TO STEWART CLOSEOUT ($3,216,117.98)

CLV 187A-FTI SHADOW LANE: ALTA DR TO CHARLESTON BLVD CLOSEOUT ($449,049.73)

COH 100D-FTI I-215 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS CLOSEOUT ($978,825.69)

COH 152D-FTI I-15 STARR INTERCHANGE CLOSEOUT ($5,991,809.73)

COH 175C-FTI NEIGHBORHOOD REHAB: GREEN VALLEY PKWY TO ARROYO GRANDE CLOSEOUT ($425,370.69)

COH 176A-FTI DOWNTOWN HENDERSON COMPLETE STREETS CLOSEOUT ($3,482,581.40)

COH 183A-FTI VALLE VERDE DRIVE: HORIZON RIDGE PKWY TO WARM SPRINGS RD CLOSEOUT ($70,323.25)

COH 192B-FTI SUNRIDGE HEIGHTS PARKWAY: EXECUTIVE AIRPORT DR TO BERMUDA RD CLOSEOUT ($152,484.44)

CNLV 089J-FTI LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD: TONOPAH AVE TO CAREY AVE CLOSEOUT ($1,236,214.71)

CNLV 173C-FTI SAWTOOTH ROADS II CLOSEOUT ($1,270,249.52)

CNLV 188B-FTI TROPICAL PARKWAY: HOLLYWOOD BLVD, LINN LN TO I-15 CLOSEOUT ($477,127.57)

RTC 003X-FTI MARYLAND PARKWAY: STEWART AVE TO RUSSELL RD CLOSEOUT ($10,031.32)

RTC 177A-FTI INTERSTATE 11: US-95 TO HOOVER DAM BRIDGE CLOSEOUT $0.00

$139,200,000.00

ENTITY PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME ACTION AMOUNT

CC 135AH-FTI2ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: 2019 CLARK COUNTY, RUSSELL ROAD

CONSTRUCTIONORIGINAL $23,000,000.00

CC 147C-FTI2 CACTUS AVENUE: VERONA WOOD TO POLARIS AVE 1ST SUPPLEMENTAL $1,000,000.00

CLV 235A-FTI2 8TH STREET: BRIDGER AVE TO STEWART AVE ORIGINAL $750,000.00

CLV 223L-FTI2INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AT

WESTWIND RD AND UPLAND BLVDORIGINAL $375,000.00

CLV 236A-FTI2 IMPERIAL AVENUE: COMMERCE ST TO 3RD ST ORIGINAL $750,000.00

CLV 089P-FTI2 LAS VEGAS BLVD: STEWART AVE TO SAHARA AVE ORIGINAL $109,000,000.00

CNLV 176J-FTI2DOWNTOWN NORTH LAS VEGAS COMPLETE STREETS AND PEDESTRIAN

IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTIONORIGINAL $3,675,000.00

RTC 144AG-FTI2 ADAPTIVE SIGNAL PILOT PROJECT ORIGINAL $650,000.00

$110,842,809.98

FUEL REVENUE INDEXING

FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION

MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX

TOTAL FISCAL IMPACT THIS AGENDA

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDING

UPDATED MARCH 12, 2020

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 43,215,679$

16,403,414$ PROGRAMMED 399,204,613$ 65,594,613$

REMAINING RESOURCES (22,378,934)$

available resources (10,422,561)$

unencumbered from previous year (23,264,564)$ programmed 142,814,624$ (2,135,376)$

remaining resources (8,287,185)$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 80,650,000$

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM 38,700,000$

ADA UPGRADES PROGRAM -$

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY UPGRADES PROGRAM -$

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 24,000,000$

142V-MVFT 11/14/2019 ENTITY NON SPECIFIC 1,750,000$ 150,000$ 150,000.00$ 11/14/2019 11 DESIGN

007M-MVFT 8/14/2014 1,450,000$ DECATUR CACTUS WARM SPRINGS 1,450,000$

016H-MVFT 8/8/2013 2,033,000$ CAREY NELLIS TOIYABE 2,033,000$

050S-MVFT 12/14/2017 750,000$ TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS PACKAGE 102 750,000$

175Q2-MVFT 10/11/2018 13,600,000$ NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM: FY 2019 CLARK COUNTY MAINTENANCE 13,600,000$

024N-MVFT 2/8/2018 150,000$ PECOS OWENS ALEXANDER 215,000$ 65,000$ 65,000$ 9/12/2019 19 DESIGN

400,000$ 400,000$ 7/11/2019 12 CONST

150,000$ 150,000$ 1/9/2020 17 CONST

750,000$ 750,000$ 3/12/2020 CONST

165B-MVFT 8/13/2015 5,050,000$ LONE MOUNTAIN CC-215 TENAYA 5,350,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 9/12/2019 20 CONST

142R2-MVFT 7/12/2018 150,000$ ENTITY NON-PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPENSES -$ (150,000)$ (150,000)$ 10/10/2019 30 CLOSEOUT

008W-MVFT 12/11/2014 1,200,000$ SUNSET RAINBOW DECATUR 840,644$ (359,356)$ (359,356)$ 11/14/2019 35 CLOSEOUT

115B-MVFT 2/9/2017 3,727,000$ ROBINDALE CIMARRON DURANGO 3,311,698$ (415,302)$ (415,302)$ 1/9/2020 34 CLOSEOUT

144P-MVFT 6/13/2013 1,962,000$ ITS: Tropicana Avenue: Western 215/Rainbow Boulevard 41,964$ (1,920,036)$ (1,920,036)$ 1/9/2020 35 CLOSEOUT

144Q-MVFT 6/13/2013 1,556,000$ ITS: Durango Drive: Warm Springs Road/Sahara Avenue 450,317$ (1,105,683)$ (1,105,683)$ 1/9/2020 36 CLOSEOUT

TOTALS 39,128,000$ 181,942,624$ (2,135,376)$ (2,135,376)$

(8,287,185)$

PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

START

FY 2020 AVAILABLE BALANCE

OPEN DESIGN CONTRACTS

OPEN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

CLOSEOUTS

LAKE MEAD 8,800,000$ 099C-MVFT 9/12/2013 7,500,000$ HOLLYWOOD CHARLESTON

MVFT TOTAL PLAN

UNENCUMBERED FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

CLARK COUNTY RESOURCES

PROJECT FROMILC AMOUNTFUNDING REQUESTS

CLARK COUNTY

TO COST 2019-20

EXHIBIT "B"

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDING

UPDATED MARCH 12, 2020

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 43,215,679$

16,403,414$ PROGRAMMED 399,204,613$ 65,594,613$

REMAINING RESOURCES (22,378,934)$

available resources 26,508,265$

unencumbered from previous year 19,370,036$ programmed 137,617,544$ 42,627,544$

remaining resources (16,119,278)$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 57,810,000$ 8,210,000$

800,000$ 800,000.00$ 10/10/2019 15 DESIGN

2,000,000$ 2,000,000.00$ 2/13/2020 CONST

135AB3-MVFT 8/9/2018 2,900,000$ ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM; FY2019 9,400,000$ 6,500,000$ 6,500,000.00$ 2/13/2020 CONST

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM 3,150,000$

175R-MVFT 7/11/2019 FISCAL YEAR 2020 350,000$ 350,000$ 350,000.00$ 7/11/2019 16 CONST

ADA UPGRADES PROGRAM 2,250,000$

205B-MVFT 7/11/2019 FISCAL YEAR 2020 275,000$ 275,000.00$ 7/11/2019 17 DESIGN

178Q-MVFT 7/11/2019 SAFETY UPGRADES PROGRAM 6,750,000$ 2,250,000$ 2,250,000.00$ 7/11/2019 18 DESIGN

223D-MVFT 7/11/2019 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 16,500,000$ 2,150,000$ 2,150,000.00$ 7/11/2019 19 DESIGN

142S-MVFT 7/11/2019 ENTITY NON SPECIFIC 2,500,000$ 250,000$ 250,000.00$ 7/11/2019 15 DESIGN

021E 7/13/2006 7,000,000$ MLK WYOMING SYMPHONY PARK 7,000,000$

021G 3/10/2016 150,000$ MLK FEASIBILITY STUDY OAKEY DESSERT INN 150,000$

009P 9/12/2019 170,000$ CHARLESTON & DURANGO INTERSECTION 320,000$ 150,000$ 150,000.00$ 9/12/2019 25 CONST

037B 8/9/2012 500,000$ RANCHO BONANZA RAINBOW 500,000$

045D 3/14/2019 1,000,000$ OGDEN MAIN LAS VEGAS BLVD 1,000,000$

072F 3/13/2003 218,000$ INDUSTRIAL SAHARA WYOMING 218,000$

124C 5/19/2005 2,772,000$ SHEEP MOUNTAIN PARKWAY CORRIDOR STUDY 2,772,000$

128D 6/12/2003 3,449,000$ US 95 @ GRANDTETON OVERPASS 3,449,000$

146K 8/8/2013 1,750,000$ BUS SHELTER ACQUISITIONS 1,750,000$

159D 1/13/2011 1,350,000$ DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS 1,350,000$

176D 10/13/2016 200,000$ DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS 200,000$

178L 2/18/2018 550,000$ DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROGRAM PHASE 1 550,000$

178T-MVFT 2/13/2020 DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROGRAM PHASE 1 7,270,000$ 7,270,000$ 7,270,000.00$ 2/13/2020 CONST

178N 1/10/2019 70,000$ PEDESTRIAN SAFETY UPGRADES PROGRAM: FY 2019 70,000$

203B 1/11/2018 800,000$ HARRIS AVENUE SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL 800,000$

214A 7/12/2018 600,000$ CASINO CENTER COMPLETE STREET COLORADO WYOMING 750,000$ 150,000$ 150,000.00$ 12/12/2019 15 DESIGN

2,700,000$ 2,700,000.00$ 10/10/2019 19 CONST

3,084,000.00$ 3,084,000.00$ 11/14/2019 16 CONST

1,100,000$ 1,100,000.00$ 7/11/2019 20 DESIGN

400,000$ 400,000.00$ 11/14/2019 18 DESIGN

300,000$ 300,000.00$ 3/12/2020 DESIGN

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 850,000$ 850,000$

146R-MVFT 9/12/2019 CITYWIDE BUS TURNOUTS 5,600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000.00$ 9/12/2019 24 DESIGN

123F-MVFT 8/8/2019 ALEXANDER DECATUR RANCHO 7,550,000$ 550,000$ 550,000.00$ 8/8/2019 16 DESIGN

054G-MVFT 11/14/2019 DESERT INN (CLARK COUNTY LEAD) NELLIS HOLLYWOOD 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000.00$ 11/14/2019 29 CONST

054H-MVFT 1/9/2020 DESERT INN (CITY LAS VEGAS LABOR) NELLIS HOLLYWOOD 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000.00$ 1/9/2020 CONST

IRON MOUNTAIN BRADLEY THOM 4,000,000$ 500,000$

IRON MOUNTAIN JONES MAVERICK 950,000$ 160,000$

JONES IRON MOUNTAIN LA CONCHA 3,120,000$ 520,000$

-$

072F-MVFT 3/13/2003 218,000$ INDUSTRIAL SAHARA WYOMING 217,462$ (538)$ (538.20)$ 8/8/2019 25 CLOSEOUT

086C-MVFT 7/13/2017 560,000$ ARVILLE CHARLESTON SAHARA 493,332$ (66,668)$ (66,668.09)$ 9/12/2019 41 CLOSEOUT

169D-MVFT 2/9/2012 3,400,000$ MAIN / COMMERCE ONE WAY COUPLET 3,139,567$ (260,433)$ (260,432.72)$ 12/12/2019 25 CLOSEOUT

142R3-MVFT 7/12/2018 100,000$ ENTITY NON SPECIFIC 82,310$ (17,690)$ (17,689.96)$ 2/13/2020 CLOSEOUT

045C-MVFT 10/12/2017 2,700,000$ OGDEN UNDERPASS CITY PKWY MAIN 2,394,358$ (305,642)$ (305,642.04)$ 2/13/2020 CLOSEOUT

128H-MVFT 6/14/2007 816,000$ KYLE CANYON INTERCHANGE @ US 95 325,515$ (490,485)$ (490,485.39)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

TOTALS 35,489,000$ 172,831,544$ 42,627,544$ 32,387,543.60$

(5,879,278.34)$

2,800,000$ 135AE-MVFT 10/10/2019 ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM; FY2020

228A-MVFT 7/11/2019 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONTRACT 1,800,000$

FY 2020 AVAILABLE BALANCE

MVFT TOTAL PLAN

UNENCUMBERED FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

CITY OF LAS VEGAS RESOURCES

PROJECT FROM

OPEN CONTRACTS

NEW PROJECTS

CLOSEOUTS

10,000,000$ LAMB / CHARLESTON TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS4,216,000$ 9/9/2004051M

PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

STARTILC AMOUNT

FUNDING REQUESTS

CITY OF LAS VEGAS

TO COST 2019-20

EXHIBIT "B"

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDING

UPDATED MARCH 12, 2020

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 311,622,367$

(137,569,114)$ PROGRAMMED 1,945,901,901$ 358,232,601$

REMAINING RESOURCES (46,610,234)$

available resources 221,880,632$

unencumbered from previous year 30,683,880$ programmed 842,200,037$ 145,367,037$

remaining resources 76,513,595$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 167,000,000$ 17,000,000$

135AH-FTI2 3/12/2020 RUSSELL RD MOUNTAIN VISTA PARADISE 23,000,000$ 23,000,000$ 23,000,000.00$ 3/12/2020 CONST

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM 49,000,000$ 4,000,000$

175U-FTI2 11/14/2019 FY 2020 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000.00$ 11/14/2019 10 DESIGN

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 94,400,000$ 4,400,000$

223K-FTI2 1/9/2020 FY 2020 3,600,000$ 3,600,000$ 3,600,000.00$ 1/9/2020 14 DESIGN

007M-FTI 7/10/2014 350,000$ DECATUR ERIE BLUE DIAMOND 350,000$

016H-FTI 8/14/2014 200,000$ CAREY NELLIS TOIYABE 200,000$

113B-FTI 6/9/2016 1,370,000$ FORT APACHE WARM SPRINGS TROPICANA 1,370,000$

006J-FTI 6/12/2014 10,000,000$ TROPICANA HUALAPAI FT APACHE 12,734,000$ 2,734,000$ 2,734,000.00$ 9/12/2019 16 CONST

-$

16,100,000$ 16,100,000.00$ 9/12/2019 17 CONST

450,000$ 450,000.00$ 10/10/2019 12 CONST

113D-FTI2 8/9/2018 1,000,000$ FORT APACHE BLUE DIAMOND WARM SPRINGS 10,200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000.00$ 10/10/2019 13 DESIGN

8,100,000$ 8,100,000.00$ 8/8/2019 14 CONST

4,500,000$ 4,500,000.00$ 9/12/2019 18 CONST

147B-FTI2 8/9/2018 1,500,000$ CACTUS FORT APACHE BUFFALO 9,000,000$

213A-FTI2 7/12/2018 800,000$ SLOAN VEGAS VALLEY RUBY CREEK 5,468,000$

217A-FTI2 9/13/2018 800,000$ CIMARRON BLUE DIAMOND ROBINDALE 10,000,000$ 200,000$

147C-FTI2 6/13/2019 9,000,000$ CACTUS VERONA WOOD POLARIS 10,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000.00$ 3/12/2020 CONST

ALTO WIDENING PECOS NELLIS 2,000,000$

BERMUDA ST ROSE SILVERADO 7,929,000$

BUFFALO BLUE DIAMOND CC-215 12,640,000$

BUFFALO CC-215 HACIENDA 7,200,000$

BUFFALO STARR BLUE DIAMOND 6,000,000$

CACTUS LAS VEGAS BLVD SPENCER 6,000,000$

CAREY NELLIS TOIYABE 6,788,000$

CENTENNIAL DURANGO CC-215 7,500,000$

CHRISTY CAREY SOUTH OF CHARLESTON 2,500,000$

CRAIG JENSEN BUFFALO 3,000,000$

DEAN MARTIN BLUE DIAMOND WARM SPRINGS 4,400,000$

DEAN MARTIN CACTUS BLUE DIAMOND 6,000,000$ 1,000,000$

500,000$ 500,000$ 11/14/2019 9 DESIGN

700,000$ 700,000$ 2/23/2020 DESIGN

ELKHORN HUALAPAI GRAND CANYON 1,900,000$ 900,000$

230A-FTI2 9/12/2019 ELKHORN TENAYA JONES 3,500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 9/12/2019 14 DESIGN

EL CAPITAN TROPICANA DESERT INN 3,500,000$

FLAMINGO TO DEAN MARTIN SLIP RAMP 6,300,000$

FLAMINGO/TROPICANA CONNECTOR 10,000,000$

113E-FTI2 10/10/2019 FORT APACHE WARM SPRINGS TROPICANA 1,025,000$ 1,025,000$ 1,025,000$ 10/10/2019 11 DESIGN

GILESPIE BARBARA SILVERADO RANCH 8,000,000$

GRAND CANYON MAULE PEACE 4,000,000$

GRAND TETON BUFFALO JONES 5,500,000$

HACIENDA MARYLAND LAMB 5,800,000$

HARMON MARYLAND MCLEOD 1,500,000$

HARMON MCLEOD BOULDER HWY 2,421,000$

099D-FTI2 9/12/2019 HOLLYWOOD LAKE MEAD CHEYENNE 6,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 9/12/2019 11 DESIGN

HOLLYWOOD SAHARA CHARLESTON 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$

HOLLYWOOD WETLANDS SAHARA 22,205,000$

130C-FTI2 9/12/2019 HUALAPAI RUSSELL FLAMINGO 4,000,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 9/12/2019 12 DESIGN

356,000$ 356,000$ 9/12/2019 10 DESIGN

750,000$ 750,000$ 1/9/2020 16 DESIGN

JONES ERIE PYLE 4,000,000$

JONES SUNSET RUSSELL 4,000,000$

KAREN MARYLAND EASTERN 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$

LAS VEGAS BL PRIMM ST. ROSE 44,125,000$

LAUGHLIN BRIDGE 55,000,000$ 55,000,000$

231A-FTI2 9/12/2019 LINDELL SOUTH OF ROY HORN 700,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 9/12/2019 15 DESIGN

LINDELL TROPICANA HARMON 7,600,000$

MAULE/BADURA CONNECTION TENAYA EL CAPITAN 5,800,000$

MCLEOD PECOS SUNSET 5,800,000$

PATRICK DURANGO DECATUR 3,000,000$

PATRICK FORT APACHE DURANGO (OVER CC-215) 3,200,000$

PYLE LAS VEGAS BL BERMUDA 3,200,000$

010N-FTI2 12/12/2019 RAINBOW ERIE BLUE DIAMOND 2,700,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 12/12/2019 10 DESIGN

RAINBOW BLUE DIAMOND CC-215 11,360,000$

ROBINDALE DURANGO BUFFALO 12,200,000$

ROBINDALE JONES DEAN MARTIN 4,500,000$

ROBINDALE LAS VEGAS BL AMIGO 4,000,000$

RUSSELL HUALAPAI BELTWAY 2,500,000$ 500,000$

SANDHILL DESERT INN SUNSET 3,500,000$

SPENCER CACTUS WINDMILL 2,100,000$

SPENCER RUSSELL TWAIN 3,500,000$

STARR LAS VEGAS BLVD BERMUDA 2,370,000$

SUNSET HUALAPAI CC-215 2,300,000$ 300,000$

SUNSET RAINBOW DECATUR 14,000,000$

TORREY PINES RUSSELL SAHARA 2,800,000$

188C-FTI2 9/12/2019 TROPICAL DURANGO CC-215 6,700,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,700,000$ 9/12/2019 13 DESIGN

TROPICANA BUS TURN-OUTS 1,000,000$

TWAIN SANDS MARYLAND 1,000,000$

VALLEY VIEW BLUE DIAMOND SUNSET 8,640,000$

WALNUT OWENS CRAIG 2,500,000$

046L-FTI2 2/13/2020 WARM SPRINGS DECATUR DEAN MARTIN 5,171,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 2/13/2020 DESIGN

WARM SPRINGS FORT APACHE I-15 6,847,000$

WASHINGTON NELLIS LOS FELIZ 10,000,000$

WINDMILL DURANGO JONES 11,546,000$

WINDMILL JONES DECATUR (WITH UPRR CROSSING) 21,000,000$

089E-FTI 9/11/2014 12,000,000$ LAS VEGAS BL ST ROSE SILVERADO 11,266,661$ (733,339)$ (733,339)$ 9/12/2019 37 CLOSEOUT

(135,007)$ (135,007)$ 9/12/2019 40 CLOSEOUT

17,450$ 17,450$ 11/14/2019 34 CLOSEOUT

002AA-FTI 5/21/2015 2,100,000$ EASTERN WIGWAM WARM SPRINGS 1,747,424$ (352,576)$ (352,576)$ 1/9/2020 28 CLOSEOUT

113B-FTI 6/9/2016 1,370,000$ FORT APACHE WARM SPRINGS TROPICANA 879,495$ (490,505)$ (490,505)$ 1/9/2020 30 CLOSEOUT

033Q-FTI 2/11/2016 1,700,000$ JONES BLUE DIAMOND DEAN MARTIN 1,400,787$ (299,213)$ (299,213)$ 2/13/2020 CLOSEOUT

002AB-FTI 10/13/2016 5,180,000$ EASTERN WARM SPRINGS DESERT INN 4,550,754$ (629,246)$ (629,246)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

003Y-FTI 2/11/2016 8,414,000$ MARYLAND RUSSELL TWAIN 7,570,016$ (843,984)$ (843,984)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

006J-FTI 6/12/2014 12,734,000$ TROPICANA HUALAPAI FORT APACHE 8,788,350$ (3,945,650)$ (3,945,650)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

010M-FTI 7/10/2014 6,900,000$ RAINBOW ERIE BLUE DIAMOND 5,250,589$ (1,649,411)$ (1,649,411)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

076V-FTI 10/10/2013 43,150,000$ CC-215 DECATUR N 5TH 41,163,516$ (1,986,484)$ (1,986,484)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

TOTALS 123,819,000$ 964,784,137$ 145,367,037$ 59,067,037$

162,813,595$

17,555,000$ 9/14/2017 1,455,000$ FORT APACHE ALEXANDER CC-215

796,000$ 7/12/2018114D-FTI2

CLOSED PROJECTS

FUNDING REQUESTS

CLARK COUNTY

TO COST 2019-20

113C-FTI2

PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

STARTILC AMOUNT

FY 2020 AVAILABLE BALANCE

FRI EXTENSION

UNENCUMBERED FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

CLARK COUNTY RESOURCES

PROJECT FROM

OPEN DESIGN CONTRACTS

NEW PROJECTS

13,396,000$ DEAN MARTINJONESSILVERADO RANCH

ALTO 2,847,543$ 202A-FTI2 12/14/2017 3,000,000$ ARNONA LAKE MEAD

WINDMILL 10,579,000$ 033S-FTI2 9/12/2019 JONES BLUE DIAMOND

SAHARA 1,200,000$ 007Q-FTI2 11/14/2019 DECATUR TROPICANA

EXHIBIT "B"

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDING

UPDATED MARCH 12, 2020

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 311,622,367$

(137,569,114)$ PROGRAMMED 1,946,105,796$ 358,436,496$

REMAINING RESOURCES (46,814,130)$

available resources 3,063,537$

unencumbered from previous year (103,213,211)$ programmed 416,060,893$ 139,948,593$

remaining resources (136,885,056)$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM -$

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM -$

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 44,800,000$

223G-FTI2 11/14/2019 FY 2020 CONSTRUCTIONPACKAGE 1 2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ 2,600,000$ 11/14/2019 13 CONST

223J-FTI2 12/12/2019 FY 2020 CONSTRUCTIONPACKAGE 2 5,500,000$ 5,500,000$ 5,500,000$ 12/12/2019 13 CONST

223L-FTI2 3/12/2020 CHARLESTON @ WESTWIND AND UPLAND 375,000$ 375,000$ 375,000$ 3/12/2020 DESIGN

ANNUAL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY UPGRADES 34,700,000$

004Q-FTI2 11/8/2018 1,100,000$ VEGAS DRIVE OVERPASS @ US95 1,100,000$

037E-FTI2 7/12/2018 1,650,000$ RANCHO SAHARA MESQUITE 9,650,000$

048L-FTI2 5/23/2019 646,250$ LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD (CLV LEAD; CNLV PARTICIPATION) SIMMONS LOSEE 5,646,250$

089G-FTI2 3/8/2018 6,650,000$ LAS VEGAS BL STEWART SAHARA 6,650,000$

089P-FTI2 3/12/2020 LAS VEGAS BL STEWART SAHARA 109,000,000$ 109,000,000$ 109,000,000$ 3/12/2020 CONST

089M-FTI2 11/9/2017 2,200,000$ LAS VEGAS BL STEWART WASHINGTON 52,200,000$

123E-FTI2 1/10/2019 1,100,000$ ALEXANDER ROAD OVERPASS @ US95 1,100,000$

128K-FTI2 9/14/2017 1,050,000$ GRAND TETON DRIVE OVERPASS @ US95 9,150,000$

135Z-MVFT 11/11/2018 5,925,000$ ATERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM; PACKAGE 6 6,800,000$ 875,000$ 875,000$ 10/10/2019 16 CONST

145B-FTI2 12/14/2017 1,000,000$ CITY PKWY GRAND CENTRAL BONANZA 1,000,000$

176E-FTI2 3/8/2018 10,850,000$ CHARLESTON COMPLETE STREET ML KING RANCHO 31,850,000$

176G-FTI2 11/8/2018 350,000$ COMPLETE STREETS: JACKSON AVENUE H ST C ST 5,600,000$

176H-FTI2 11/8/2018 350,000$ COMPLETE STREET: WYOMING AVENUE LAS VEGAS BLVD INDUSTRIAL 8,875,000$ 525,000$ 525,000$ 8/8/2019 17 DESIGN

178K-FTI2 2/8/2018 100,000$ DOWNTOWN VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STREETLIGHT IMPROVEMENT 4,200,000$ 2,300,000$ 2,300,000$ 12/12/2019 14 CONST

178M2-FTI2 4/18/2018 615,000$ PEDESTRIAN SAFETY UPGRADES FISCAL YEAR 2018 8,147,300$ 170,000$ 170,000$ 10/10/2019 17 DESIGN

198A-FTI2 5/18/2017 27,000,000$ 3RD STREET FREEMONT CHARLESTON 28,700,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,700,000$ 8/8/2019 18 CONST

204A-FTI2 11/9/2017 800,000$ 7TH COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS STEWART BRIDGER 7,800,000$

207A-FT12 2/8/2018 1,000,000$ PINTO RANCHO ML KING 5,000,000$

13,600,000$ 13,600,000$ 8/8/2019 19 CONST

2,900,000$ 2,900,000$ 10/10/2019 18 CONST

212A-FTI2 7/12/2018 500,000$ CALIFORNIA COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS COMMERCE 3RD 5,700,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 1/9/2020 19 DESIGN

218A-FTI2 9/13/2018 150,000$ CITYWIDE BOTTLENECK INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS DECATUR BOULEVARD @ US 95 150,000$

218B-FTI2 10/11/2018 100,000$ CITYWIDE BOTTLENECK INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ANN ROAD @ CENTENNIAL CENTER 100,000$

218C-FTI2 10/11/2018 35,000$ CITYWIDE BOTTLENECK INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS NELLIS BOULEVARD @ CHARLESTON BLVD 35,000$

219A-FTI2 9/13/2018 405,000$ BOULDER AVE COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1ST ART 3,405,000$

-$

235A-FTI2 3/12/2020 8TH COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS STEWART BRIDGER 7,750,000$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 3/12/2020 DESIGN

179B-FTI2 10/10/2019 6TH STREET BRIDGER STEWART 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 10/10/2019 14 CONST

BONANZA COMPLETE STREET ML KING D ST 500,000$

CASINO CENTER COMPLETE STREET COLORADO WYOMING 3,150,000$

CENTENNIAL PARKWAY ALPINE RIDGE DURANGO 1,000,000$ 500,000$

009Q-FTI2 12/12/2019 CHARLESTON ART GRAND CENTRAL 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 12/12/2019 12 DESIGN

144AD-FTI2 9/12/2019 CLV FIBER OPTIC MASTER PLAN PHASE 2 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 9/12/2019 23 DESIGN

227A-FTI2 7/11/2019 COLORADO AVENUE COMMERCE 4TH 4,700,000$ 700,000$ 700,000$ 7/11/2019 14 DESIGN

DESERT INN (CCPW LEAD AGENCY) NELLIS HOLLYWOOD 3,800,000$

DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROGRAM PHASE 1 7,000,000$

EASTERN COMPLETE STREET CEDAR OWENS 1,000,000$

500,000$ 500,000$ 9/12/2019 22 DESIGN

150,000$ 150,000$ 11/14/2019 14 DESIGN

HARRIS AVENUE SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL 3,150,000$

236A-FTI2 3/12/2020 IMPERIAL COMMERCE 3RD 750,000$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 3/12/2020 DESIGN

INDUSTRIAL ROAD BOSTON CIRCUS CIRCUS 2,500,000$

226A-FTI2 7/11/2019 IRON MOUNTAIN ROAD BRADLEY THOM 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 7/11/2019 13 DESIGN

OGDEN COMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS MAIN LAS VEGAS BLVD 10,000,000$

500,000$ 500,000$ 8/8/2019 15 DESIGN

1,700,000$ 1,700,000$ 11/14/2019 15 DESIGN

SUMMERLIN PARKWAY PHASE 4 900,000$

TARGETED NEIGHBORHOOD 5,500,000$

TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADES 9,500,000$

144AF-FTI2 2/23/2020 NORTHWEST ITS IMPROVEMENTS 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 2/23/2020 DESIGN

-$

009K-FTI 1/8/2015 300,000$ CHARLESTON GRAND CENTRAL FREEMONT 143,481$ (156,519)$ (156,519)$ 8/8/2019 20 CLOSEOUT

135W-FTI2 7/13/2017 6,750,000$ ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM - PACKAGE 4 5,002,127$ (1,747,873)$ (1,747,873)$ 9/12/2019 39 CLOSEOUT

124J-FTI 6/12/2014 900,000$ I-15 FRONTAGE ROADS STUDY 490,164$ (409,836)$ (409,836)$ 9/12/2019 38 CLOSEOUT

135U-FTI 1/9/2014 8,616,000$ ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM - PACKAGE 2 7,917,940$ (698,060)$ (698,060)$ 12/12/2019 24 CLOSEOUT

169D-FTI 1/9/2014 57,365,000$ MAIN / COMMERCE ONE WAY COUPLET 54,579,642$ (2,785,358)$ (2,785,358)$ 12/12/2019 25 CLOSEOUT

181A-FTI 6/12/2014 1,483,000$ COOLIDGE MAIN 4TH 388,169$ (1,094,831)$ (1,094,831)$ 12/12/2019 26 CLOSEOUT

182A-FTI 6/12/2014 8,600,000$ GASS MAIN CHARLESTON 8,151,480$ (448,520)$ (448,520)$ 1/9/2020 32 CLOSEOUT

178D-FTI 6/12/2014 1,050,000$ PEDESTRIAN SAFTEY STREET LIGHT UPGRADES 911,501$ (138,499)$ (138,499)$ 2/13/2020 CLOSEOUT

009M-FTI 2/11/2016 1,500,000$ CHARLESTON RANCHO ML KING 965,979$ (534,021)$ (534,021)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

051Q-FTI 2/8/2018 2,000,000$ LAKE MEAD COMSTOCK/STELLA 1,264,403$ (735,597)$ (735,597)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

092C-FTI 12/11/2014 8,900,000$ SUMMERLIN PARKWAY CC-215 US-95 8,486,019$ (413,981)$ (413,981)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

128H-FTI 8/13/2015 9,108,000$ KYLE CANYON INTERCHANGE @ US-95 8,689,854$ (418,146)$ (418,146)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

179A-FTI 6/12/2014 8,050,000$ 6TH STREET BRIDGER STEWART 4,833,882$ (3,216,118)$ (3,216,118)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

187A-FTI 12/11/2014 1,035,000$ SHADOW ALTA CHARLESTON 585,950$ (449,050)$ (449,050)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

TOTALS 180,733,250$ 593,894,143$ 139,948,593$ 139,448,593$

(136,385,056)$

650,000$

187B-FTI2 8/8/2019 SHADOW ALTA CHARLESTON 6,700,000$

8/8/2019 GO MED GRANT AUTONAMOUS VEHICLES MEDICAL DISTRICT

PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

STARTILC AMOUNT

FUNDING REQUESTS

FRI EXTENSION

UNENCUMBERED FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

CITY OF LAS VEGAS RESOURCES

PROJECT FROM TO COST 2019-20

FY 2020 AVAILABLE BALANCE

CITY OF LAS VEGAS

OPEN DESIGN CONTRACTS

NEW PROJECTS

CLOSEOUTS

208A-FTI2 3/8/2018 1,500,000$ FREMONT MULTI MODAL IMPROVEMENTS LAS VEGAS BL EASTERN 15,100,000$

144AC-FTI2

EXHIBIT "B"

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDING

UPDATED MARCH 12, 2020

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 311,622,367$

(137,569,114)$ PROGRAMMED 1,946,687,065$ 359,017,765$

REMAINING RESOURCES (47,395,398)$

available resources 26,066,231$

unencumbered from previous year (13,242,154)$ programmed 146,215,763$ 12,841,763$

remaining resources 13,224,468$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 20,000,000$

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM 11,000,000$

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1,500,000$

-$

055J-FTI2 2/14/2019 820,000$ LAMB CENTENNIAL CC-215 CONNECTIVITY 17,010,000$

123D-FTI2 11/9/2017 2,350,000$ ALEXANDER SIMMONS N. 5TH 8,650,000$

135AA-FTI2 1/11/2018 300,000$ ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION : CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS MAINTENANCE 300,000$

165D-FTI2 2/14/2019 800,000$ LONE MOUNTAIN LOSEE COMMERCE 8,649,000$

167B-FTI2 2/14/2019 125,000$ WASHBURN VALLEY WILLIS 1,025,000$

167C-FTI2 2/14/2019 225,000$ WASHBURN COMMERCE N. 5TH 975,000$

170D-FTI2 2/14/2019 220,000$ CENTENNIAL PECOS LAMB 3,220,000$ 1,000,000$

176F-FTI2 11/9/2017 1,700,000$ DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS & PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 1,700,000$

176J-FTI2 3/12/2020 DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS & PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 3,675,000$ 3,675,000$ 3,675,000.00$ 3/12/2020 CONST

203A-FTI2 11/9/2018 700,000$ SCHOOL SAFETY PROGRAM 4,000,000$ 1,300,000$

205A-FTI2 1/11/2018 500,000$ ADA UPGRADES PROGRAM 1,000,000$ 500,000$

048L-FTI2 5/23/2019 528,750$ LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD (CLV LEAD ENTITY) SIMMONS LOSEE 5,528,750$

048M-FTI2 7/11/2019 LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD (CLV LEAD ENTITY) SIMMONS LOSEE 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000.00$ 7/11/2019 22 DESIGN

-$

160B-FTI2 7/11/2019 ALLEN CRAIG CENTENNIAL 2,642,000$ 542,000$ 542,000.00$ 7/11/2019 24 DESIGN

BELMONT LAKE MEAD LAS VEGAS BL 2,500,000$

BRUCE COLTON ALEXANDER 1,760,000$

232A-FTI2 10/10/2019 CIVIC CENTER CAREY CHEYENNE 2,150,000$ 225,000$ 225,000$ 10/10/2019 22 DESIGN

DEER SPRINGS/SHELLEY BERKLEY WAY LOSEE LAMB 6,500,000$

DONOVAN WAY DMV TROPICAL 2,650,000$

GOWAN CIVIC CENTER PECOS 1,850,000$

089N-FTI2 10/10/2019 LAS VEGAS BLVD TONOPAH CAREY 13,000,000$ 2,250,000$ 2,250,000$ 10/10/2019 21 DESIGN

MARTIN LUTHER KING CAREY BROOKS 3,000,000$

024P-FTI2 6/13/2019 PECOS (CLARK COUNTY LEAD) OWENS ALEXANDER 4,300,000$ 4,300,000$ 4,300,000$ 11/14/2019 12 CONST

024Q-FTI2 7/11/2019 PECOS OWENS ALEXANDER 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 7/11/2019 21 DESIGN

148E-FTI2 7/11/2019 SIMMONS RED COACH HAMMER 4,600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 7/11/2019 23 DESIGN

SLOAN LAS VEGAS BL TROPICAL 6,650,000$

TROPICAL LAMB PECOS 3,000,000$

NORTH 5TH / CENTENNIAL INTERSECTION

IMPROVEMENTS 1,400,000$ 1,400,000$

WALNUT ROADWAY COMPLETION CENTENNIAL CC-215 3,200,000$

NORTH 5TH CHEYENNE LONE MOUNTAIN 11,500,000$ 1,500,000$

-$

016K-FTI 8/14/2014 500,000$ CAREY REVERE PECOS 451,926$ (48,074)$ (48,074)$ 7/11/2019 36 CLOSEOUT

048K-FTI 10/12/2017 1,140,000$ LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD COUPLET 6,789$ (1,133,211)$ (1,133,211)$ 8/8/2019 21 CLOSEOUT

052G-FTI 5/15/2014 3,500,000$ TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 3,039,641$ (460,359)$ (460,359)$ 8/8/2019 22 CLOSEOUT

089J-FTI 9/11/2014 2,250,000$ LAS VEGAS BLVD TONOPAH CAREY 1,013,785$ (1,236,215)$ (1,236,215)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

173C-FTI 5/15/2014 16,986,000$ SAWTOOTH ROADS II 15,715,750$ (1,270,250)$ (1,270,250)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

188B-FTI 3/10/2016 6,775,000$ TROPICAL/HOLLYWOOD LINN I-15 6,297,872$ (477,128)$ (477,128)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

TOTALS 39,419,750$ 185,635,513$ 12,841,763$ 7,141,763$

18,924,468$

CLOSEOUTS

OPEN DESIGN CONTRACTS

NEW PROJECTS

2019-20 PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

STARTILC AMOUNT

FY 2020 AVAILABLE BALANCE

FUNDING REQUESTS

FRI EXTENSION

UNENCUMBERED FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS RESOURCES

PROJECT FROM

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS

TO COST

EXHIBIT "B"

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDING

UPDATED MARCH 12, 2020

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 311,622,367$

(137,569,114)$ PROGRAMMED 1,946,105,796$ 358,436,496$

REMAINING RESOURCES (46,814,130)$

available resources 7,111,967$

unencumbered from previous year (55,297,629)$ programmed 204,239,753$ 10,739,753$

remaining resources (3,627,786)$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 1,500,000$

135AG-FTI2 12/12/2019 FY 2020 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 12/12/2019 DESIGN

NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM -$

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 290,000$

-$

002AC-FTI2 5/18/2017 500,000$ EASTERN IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I HORIZON RIDGE I-215 2,000,000$

008X-FTI2 4/11/2019 760,000$ SUNSET I-515 PABCO 760,000$

088C-FTI2 5/23/2019 150,000$ PEBBLE PECOS WIGWAM 3,150,000$

111B-FTI2 4/12/2018 600,000$ BERMUDA VOLUNTEER ST. ROSE 600,000$

140B-FTI2 4/12/2018 540,000$ GREENWAY BOULDER PARADISE HILLS 4,500,000$

192C-FTI2 5/23/2019 1,800,000$ SUNRIDGE HEIGHTS EXECUTIVE AIRPORT BERMUDA 1,800,000$

192D-FTI2 1/9/2020 SUNRIDGE HEIGHTS PHASE 2A EXECUTIVE AIRPORT BERMUDA 7,000,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,000,000$ 1/9/2020 CONST

201A-FTI2 5/18/2017 400,000$ ROMA HILLS HORIZON RIDGE ASCAYA 2,100,000$ 1,700,000$

209A-FTI2 4/12/2018 300,000$ HEATHER GREENWAY COLLEGE 2,100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 9/12/2019 31 DESIGN

210A-FTI2 4/12/2018 500,000$ FOSTER AND PRICE BOULDER BARRETT 2,300,000$

216A-FTI2 9/13/2018 500,000$ NEVADA STATE PARADISE HILLS I-515 4,500,000$

224A-FTI2 5/23/2019 1,200,000$ BOULDER HWY WAGONWHEEL TULIP FALLS 5,000,000$

100F-FTI2 7/13/2017 I-515 AT I-215 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 12/12/2019 DESIGN

APPALOOSA WAGONWHEEL EQUESTRIAN 3,500,000$

ATHOL FOSTER ROLLY 3,000,000$

BURKHOLDER RACETRACK LAKE MEAD 4,000,000$

COLLEGE MISSION BOULDER HWY 4,500,000$

CORONADO CENTER EASTERN SUNRIDGE HEIGHTS 1,500,000$ 300,000$

DEMOCRACY DRIVE ANTHEM HIGHLANDS VIA INSPIRADA 5,000,000$

DOWNTOWN HENDERSON PHASE II (MAJOR, MINOR, VICTORY, TEXAS, OCEAN) 8,000,000$

EASTERN IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II HORIZON RIDGE I-215 7,000,000$

EASTGATE, MIDDLEGATE, PARKSON, CAPE HORN 7,500,000$

EQUESTRIAN FOOTHILLS BOULDER HWY 3,600,000$

GIBSON RD PH1 I215 BOULDER HWY 6,000,000$

234A-FTI2 12/12/2019 GILESPIE ST ROSE PKWY VIA INSPIRADA 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 12/12/2019 DESIGN

GRAND HILLS SEVEN HILLS EASTERN 2,500,000$

HORIZON RIDGE - PHASE II GREEN VALLEY STEPHANIE 4,300,000$

HORIZON RIDGE - PHASE I STEPHANIE PARADISE HILLS 7,000,000$

229A-FTI2 7/11/2019 INTERCHAGE; NEVADA STATE & I-11 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 7/11/2019 30 DESIGN

INTERCHANGE; EASTERN & I-215 23,000,000$ 500,000$

229B-FTI2 7/11/2019 INTERCHANGE; I-215 at PECOS AND I-215 AT GREEN VALLEY 7,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 7/11/2019 31 DESIGN

INTERCHANGE; WAGONWHEEL & I-515 5,000,000$ 500,000$

KELSO DUNES ROUNDABOUTS 2,000,000$

MAGIC WAY EQUESTRIAN WARM SPRINGS 2,500,000$

MISSION DR PH I COH LIMITS COLLEGE DR 4,000,000$

PACIFIC HORIZON APIAN 1,000,000$

PARADISE HILLS CALVERT GREENWAY 3,800,000$

PASEO VERDE GREEN VALLEY GIBSON 4,500,000$

PECOS I-215 WINDMILL 4,500,000$

PUEBLO BURKHOLDER LAKE MEAD 3,100,000$

RAMROD AND OLYMPIC GREEN VALLEY MOUNTAIN VISTA 3,000,000$

ROBINDALE GREEN VALLEY EASTERN 3,100,000$

SEVEN HILLS GRAND HILLS ST. ROSE AND LOOP 4,000,000$

SUN CITY ANTHEM/ANTHEM EASTERN REUNION 4,000,000$

SUNSET I-515 PABCO 4,500,000$ 900,000$

WAGONWHEEL I-515 FOOTHILLS 1,750,000$

WARM SPRINGS LAKE MEAD RACETRACK 4,000,000$

WARM SPRINGS PECOS I-515 10,000,000$

171C-FTI2 9/12/2019 WATER STURM CADENCE VISTA 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 9/12/2019 28 CONST

WEISNER/BURNS SUNSET COH LIMITS 4,000,000$

WIGWAM EASTERN GIBSON 5,000,000$

WINDMILL ARROYO GRANDE GREEN VALLEY 4,500,000$

-$

011B-FTI 12/12/2013 1,700,000$ CENTER BURKHOLDER LAKE MEAD PKWY 1,475,231$ (224,769)$ (224,769)$ 7/11/2019 35 CLOSEOUT

002AC-FTI 7/13/2017 750,000$ EASTERN PECOS BECKLER 495,674$ (254,326)$ (254,326)$ 9/12/2019 36 CLOSEOUT

(331,295)$ (331,295)$ 11/14/2019 31 CLOSEOUT

722$ 722$ 1/9/2020 31 CLOSEOUT

175A-FTI 10/10/2013 2,275,000$ NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION ANTHEM 2,108,155$ (166,845)$ (166,845)$ 11/14/2019 32 CLOSEOUT

175H-FTI 8/14/2014 300,000$ WEST HENDERSON ROADS 112,694$ (187,306)$ (187,306)$ 11/14/2019 33 CLOSEOUT

100D-FTI 7/13/2017 2,000,000$ I-515 AT I-215 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 1,021,174$ (978,826)$ (978,826)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

152D-FTI 7/13/2017 35,280,000$ I-15 AT STARR AVENUE INTERCHANGE 29,288,190$ (5,991,810)$ (5,991,810)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

175C-FTI 10/10/2013 7,471,000$ NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION GREEN VALLEY ARROYO GRANDE 7,045,629$ (425,371)$ (425,371)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

176A-FTI 10/10/2013 12,000,000$ DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS 8,517,419$ (3,482,581)$ (3,482,581)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

183A-FTI 8/14/2014 500,000$ VALLE VERDE HORIZON RIDGE WARM SPRINGS 429,677$ (70,323)$ (70,323)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

192B-FTI 12/14/2017 300,000$ SUNRIDGE HEIGHTS EXECUTIVE AIRPORT BERMUDA 452,484$ 152,484$ 152,484$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

-$

-$

TOTALS 75,326,000$ 279,565,753$ 10,739,753$ 6,839,753$

272,214$ FY 2020 AVAILABLE BALANCE

TO COST 2019-20

OPEN DESIGN CONTRACTS

NEW PROJECTS

CLOSEOUTS

CITY OF HENDERSON

015R-FTI 9/14/2017

FUNDING REQUESTS

FRI EXTENSION

UNENCUMBERED FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

CITY OF HENDERSON RESOURCES

PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

STARTILC AMOUNT PROJECT FROM

5,500,000$ HORIZON PACIFIC BOULDER HWY 5,169,426$

EXHIBIT "B"

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDING

UPDATED MARCH 12, 2020

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 311,622,367$

(137,569,114)$ PROGRAMMED 1,946,747,390$ 359,078,090$

REMAINING RESOURCES (47,455,723)$

available resources 53,500,000$

unencumbered from previous year 3,500,000$ programmed 337,970,619$ 50,120,619$

remaining resources 3,379,381$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

-$

144W-FTI2 6/14/2018 5,000,000$ AMS COMMUNICATIONS, ITS EQUIPMENT AND SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION UPGRADE 16,500,000$ 11,500,000$ 10,000,000$ 7/29/2019 CONST

144V-FTI2 6/14/2018 2,000,000$ ITS DEPLOYMENT ALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF 215 BELTWAY I-15 NORTH I-515 10,050,000$ 8,050,000$ 7,200,000$ 7/29/2019 CONST

-$

ASSET MANAGEMENT 30,350,000$ 16,350,000$

144AE-FTI2 12/12/2019 ASSET MANAGEMENT - PILOT PROJET 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 12/12/2019 DESIGN

144AG-FTI2 3/12/2020 ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SOLUTION - PILOT PROJECT 650,000$ 650,000$ 650,000$ 3/12/2020 DESIGN

144X-FTI2 7/11/2019 FAST SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 4,415,000$ 415,000$ 415,000$ 7/11/2019 9 CONST

144Y-FTI2 7/11/2019 FAST PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 1,500,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 7/11/2019 10 DESIGN

FMS/AMS SOFTWARE 8,800,000$ 800,000$

144AB-FTI2 10/10/2019 WORKZONE ITS PROJECTS 5,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 10/10/2019 10 DESIGN

ITS DATA ANALYTICS 1,250,000$ 250,000$

ROADSIDE UNIT CONNECTED VEHICLE DEPLOYMENT 2,500,000$ 500,000$

ATC GPS PRE-EMPTION 5,000,000$ 1,000,000$

003Z-FTI2 2/13/2020 MARYLAND FIXED GUIDEWAY CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AIRPORT STEWART 125,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 2/13/2020 DESIGN

144CC-FTI2 5/24/2018 382,000$ ITS; FAST SMART WORKZONE PLANNING 366,850$ (15,150)$ (15,150)$ 1/9/2020 31 CLOSEOUT

211B3-FTI2 12/13/2018 1,500,000$ TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - FY 2019 1,480,800$ (19,200)$ (19,200)$ 1/9/2020 33 CLOSEOUT

003X-FTI 5/11/2015 3,125,036$ MARYLAND STEWART RUSSELL 3,115,005$ (10,031)$ (10,031)$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

177A-FTI 10/10/2013 53,120,194$ INTERSTATE 11 US-95 HOOVER DAM BRIDGE 53,120,194$ -$ -$ 3/12/2020 CLOSEOUT

TOTALS 65,127,230$ 270,097,849$ 46,620,619$ 25,370,619$

28,129,381$

AMOUNT DATE AGENDA PHASE

-$

222A-FTI2 2/14/2019 1,000,000$ CLV, PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AT INTERSECTION OF SAHARA AVENUE AT LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD 32,000,000$

-$

TIBP ROAD PROJECTS 97,500,000$

223B-FTI2 2/13/2020 CLV, MLK EXTENSION OAKEY DESERT INN 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 2/13/2020 DESIGN

MARTIN LUTHER KING EXTENSION 1,000,000$

-$

TOTALS 124,254,460$ 134,000,000$ 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$

OPEN DESIGN CONTRACTS

NEW PROJECTS

OPEN DESIGN CONTRACTS

NEW PROJECTS

PROJECT FROM

FY 2020 AVAILABLE BALANCE

CLOSEOUTS

RESORT CORRIDOR AREA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS (TIBP)

FUNDING REQUESTSTO COST 2019-20

PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

START

DESIGN

AMOUNT

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RTC)

FUNDING REQUESTS

FRI EXTENSIONUNENCUMBERED FROM PREVIOUS YEAR

RTC & TIBP RESOURCES

PROJECT FROM TO COST 2019-20 PROJECT

NUMBER

DESIGN

START

DESIGN

AMOUNT

EXHIBIT "B"

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering

ssf Consent

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONOF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADARECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE REVISIONS TO UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS WITH RESPECT TO CURRENT ACCESSIBILITY BEST PRACTICES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined

BACKGROUND: Kimley-Horn and Associates recently completed an audit of the regional standard drawings to determine the extent to which they reflect and adhere to current accessibility law and guidelines. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the proposed Public Rights-Of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) both give direction and guidance on how to provide safe and effective infrastructure for all road users regardless of physical or mental capabilities. The drawing revisions suggested by Kimley-Horn, based on the audit, were presented in the form of redlined drawings at the March 19, 2019 Operations Subcommittee meeting, and members were asked to provide comments on the suggested revisions. Following review of the comments, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada staff refined Kimley-Horn’s redlines and prepared a set of drawings that depict the proposed revisions for the Subcommittee to consider sending to industry review and the Specifications Subcommittee. At its January 8, 2020 meeting, the Specifications Subcommittee voted to send the proposed revisions to the Executive Advisory Committee.

The proposed revisions to this set of drawings are recommended for approval.

6911

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

PLAN

4 TACK WELDS

EQUALLY

SPACED

S.W

.

2'

C&

G

3"

3"

LIP OF GUTTER

B

24"

1/2" x 3"

STEEL ANCHOR

12" O.C.

5/8"

1/8"

2-1/4"

STEEL FLOOR

PLATE

3"x3"x1/4"

ANGLE (CONT.)

5/8" BAR

(CONT.)

3/16"

DETAIL "I"

4"

S.W

.

6"

STEEL

FLOOR PLATE

24"

6"

8" 12" 8"12"

19-1/2"

DETAIL "I"

WEAKENED

PLANE JOINT

TYPICAL

FLOWLINE

OF GUTTER

2%

2%

6"

SECTION A-A

BACK OF

SIDEWALK

6" TYPE I OR TYPE II

AGGREGATE BASE

SECTION B-B

B

A A

B C H M NLAGENCY APPROVED R

NOTES

1. IF WIDTH OF PLATE IS GREATER THAN 24", A SPECIAL DESIGN IS REQUIRED.

2. ALL EXPOSED METAL PARTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED, AND ALL GALVANIZING

DAMAGED BY FABRICATION OR INSTALLATION SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS

OF ALUMINUM PAINT (GALVONOX OR EQUAL). EXPOSED METAL PARTS IN

THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE SHALL BE FIRM, STABLE, AND

SLIP-RESISTANT.

3. TACK WELDS BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND STEEL PLATE FLOOR WITHIN

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES SHALL HAVE NO VERTICAL SURFACE

DISCONTINUITIES GREATER THAN 1/4'', REGARDLESS OF CONSTRUCTION

TOLERANCES.

UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS

CLARK COUNTY AREA

SIDEWALK DRAIN

DWG. NO. 236DATE XX-XX-XX

SPECIFICATION REFERENCE

BASE AGGREGATES

CONCRETE

STRUCTURAL STEEL

302

501

710

2% MAX.

2% MAX.

TACK

WELDS

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

BIKE LANE DELINEATION AND LEGEND

BIKE LANE SIGNAGE

14"

6'

6"

6'

2'

SEE

NOTE 3

TR

AN

SIT

IO

N Z

ON

E

SEE

NOTE 3

6'

B C H M NLAGENCY APPROVED R

BICYCLE LANE DELINEATION,

LEGEND, AND SIGNAGE

UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS

CLARK COUNTY AREA

SPECIFICATION REFERENCE

DATE XX-XX-XX DWG. NO. 244.9

NOTES

1. BIKE LANE LEGENDS SHALL BE APPROVED TYPE I PAVEMENT MARKING FILM AND SHALL BE SLIP RESISTANT.

2. BIKE LANE LINES SHALL BE APPROVED TYPE II PAVEMENT MARKING FILM AND SHALL BE SLIP RESISTANT.

3. BIKE LANES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET WHEN ADJACENT TO A PARKING LANE, 4 FEET MINIMUM IN OTHER CASES

AND NO GREATER THAN 8 FT WIDE; HOWEVER A WIDTH OF 5 FEET IS PREFERRED.

4. BICYCLE LANE DELINEATION, LEGEND, AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MUTCD, LATEST EDITION.

5. SIGN SIZE AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MUTCD, LATEST EDITION.

6. THE BIKE LANE SIGNAGE SHALL BE TYPE XI SHEETING.

7. SIGN PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM WITH STANDARD DRAWING NO. 249.

6" X 2' SKIP WHITE

LINE 8' ON CENTER

R3-17

(BLACK AND WHITE)

W (IN.)

SEE NOTE 5

H (IN

.)

SE

E N

OT

E 5

6" SOLID WHITE LINE

SEE NOTE 2

SEE NOTE 1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

TO

R

OA

DW

AY

REFLECTORIZED

OBSTRUCTION

(SEE NOTE 2)

4" SOLID YELLOW LINE

4" DASHED YELLOW LINE

(SEE NOTE 1)

BOLLARDS

REFLECTORIZED

4" SOLID YELLOW LINE

4" SOLID YELLOW LINE

4" DASHED YELLOW LINE

4" DASHED YELLOW LINE

(SEE NOTE 3)

4" SOLID YELLOW LINE

CENTERLINE DELINEATION CENTERLINE DELINEATION

(SEE NOTE 3)

1'

10'

45' 45'

9'

3'9'

3'

9'

9'

10'

45' 45'

1'

12'

3'

9'

PASSING PERMITTED PASSING PROHIBITED

B C H M NLAGENCY APPROVED R

NOTES

1. USE BOLLARDS ONLY AT LOCATIONS WHERE UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS IS ANTICIPATED. INSTALL EITHER 1 OR 3 (5 FT. SPACING

DESIRABLE, 4 FT. CLEAR SPACING MINIMUM) SIX-INCH DIAMETER BY 3 FT. TALL REFLECTORIZED BOLLARDS WHEN

NECESSARY. CENTERLINE DELINEATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT APPROACH TO INTERSECTION EVEN WHEN BOLLARD IS

NOT PROVIDED.

2. ANY OBSTRUCTION IN PATH SHOULD BE REMOVED. IF OBSTRUCTION CANNOT BE REMOVED, OBSTRUCTION MUST BE

REFLECTORIZED.

3. USE CENTERLINE DELINEATION AT APPROACHES TO INTERSECTIONS AND AROUND OSTRUCTIONS IN ALL CASES. ONLY USE

CENTERLINE DELINEATION IN OTHER CASES WHERE CONFLICTS BETWEEN USERS TRAVELING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ARE

ANTICIPATED.

DELINEATION AND BOLLARD USAGE

ON SHARED USE PATH

UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS

CLARK COUNTY AREA

SPECIFICATION REFERENCE

TRAFFIC STRIPING

PAVEMENT MARKERS

628

633

DWG. NO. 255.4DATE XX-XX-XX

TYPICAL CENTERLINE DELINEATION AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF A SHARED USE PATH

TYPICAL CENTERLINE DELINEATION AROUND OBSTRUCTION

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

BEHIND CURBSIDE SIDEWALK

BACK PORTION OF CURBSIDE SIDEWALK (NOT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION)

OPEN AREA OR BETWEEN CURB AND SIDEWALK

CU

RB

L

C POLE

L

C

POLE

TYP.

12"

15", TYP.

SIDEWALK

BACK OF SIDEWALK

CONCRETE OR GROUT

BACK OF CURB

L

C POLE

RIGHT-OF-WAY

FOUNDATION AS NEEDED TO STAY WITHIN

OFFSET CAP AND ALTERNATE 30" DIAMETER

CU

RB

TYP.

12",

15", TYP.

BACK OF CURB

CU

RB

SIDEWALK

L

C POLE

L

C

POLE

5' TYP.

6' TYP.

TYP.

12"

CONCRETE OR GROUT

BACK OF CURBBACK OF SIDEWALK

15" TYP.

5' TYP.

ALTERNATE 30" DIA.

CONCRETE FOUNDATION

SHOWN

ALTERNATE 30" DIA.

CONCRETE FOUNDATION

SHOWN

SHOWN

CONCRETE FOUNDATION

ALTERNATE 30" DIA.

C

L

CAP (SEE NOTE 2)

CAP (SEE NOTE 2)

CAP (SEE NOTE 2)

CONCRETE OR GROUT

48" MIN.

48"

MIN.

OFFSET

SIDEWALK

48" MIN.

48" MIN. PER AASHTO

ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE

(EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED)

(SEE USD 320.1)

(EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED)

(SEE USD 320.1)

B C H M NLAGENCY APPROVED R

LIGHTING STANDARD SETBACK

UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS

CLARK COUNTY AREA

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREETLIGHTING

501

623

SPECIFICATION REFERENCE

DWG. NO. 320DATE XX-XX-XX

NOTES

1. FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE

OF THE SIDEWALK WHENEVER FEASIBLE. A

CLEARANCE OF 48" SHALL BE MAINTAINED

ON SIDEWALK TO COMPLY WITH THE

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE.

2. FOUNDATION CAP SHALL BE CONCRETE OR

GROUT AS DESIGNATED BY THE ENTITY

ENGINEER.

3. REFER TO STANDARD DRAWING NO. 321 FOR

FOUNDATION DETAIL.

*

48" MIN.

*

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREETLIGHTING623

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE501

EXISTING GROUNDING PLATE

FINISHED GRADE

CAP. SEE NOTE 3.

FOR CONDUIT INSTALLATION, REPLACE

REMOVE ENTIRE FOUNDATION CAP

L

C

POLE

EXISTING FOUNDATION

NEW 1-1/4" PVC

CONCRETE.

CONDUIT. REPLACE

OF FOUNDATION TO INSTALL

REMOVE MINIMUM PORTION

36

" M

AX

.

24

" T

YP

.

FOUNDATION FOR INSTALLATION

OF UNDERGROUND CONDUIT

MODIFIED EXISTING STREETLIGHT

321.1.S1

CONDUIT, TYP.

08-09-18

LIMIT FOR 24" SQUARE

EXISTING FOUNDATION

LIMIT FOR OPT. 36" DIA.

SEE STANDARD DRAWING NO. 320

1. WHEN NO GROUNDING ELECTRODE EXISTS, 5/8 IN. DIA. SOLID COPPER GROUNDING ROD,

8 FT. IN LENGTH, SHALL BE INSTALLED.

2. ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND HAVE A MINIMUM 1 IN. FREE THREAD.

NOTES:

DWG. NO.DATE

CLARK COUNTY AREA

UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS

SPECIFICATION REFERENCE

3. FOUNDATION CAP SHALL BE CONCRETE OR GROUT AS DESIGNATED BY ENTITY ENGINEER.

FOR CAP PLACEMENT.

SUPPLEMENTAL DRAWING

PROFESSIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER STAMP ON FILE

CAGENCY APPROVED

R

E

M

O

V

E

D

R

A

W

I

N

G

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

AGENCY APPROVED R

UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS

CLARK COUNTY AREA

SPECIFICATION REFERENCE

DATE XX-XX-XX DWG. NO. 332 SHEET 1 OF 2

PLAN VIEW

MOUNTING BASE DETAIL

SERVICE PEDESTAL FOUNDATION

STREET LIGHTING AND/OR TRAFFIC SIGNAL

C L

SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUIT TO

TRANSFORMER

NOTES

1. BARE COPPER GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL BE LOOPED AROUND ANCHOR BOLTS ONE TIME AND CONNECTED

TO EACH ANCHOR BOLT BEFORE CONTINUING DOWN TO THE GROUNDING PLATE.

2. IN AREAS WHERE R/W PERMITS, THE CONCRETE BASE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK.

3. REFER TO STD. DWG. 331 FOR SERVICE PEDESTAL SETBACK AND ORIENTATION.

4. WIRE SIZES ARE BASED ON UNDERGROUND FEED.

5. WIRE SIZES SHALL BE INCREASED FOR VOLTAGE DROP LIMITATION WHEN RUN IS LONG.

6. PULLBOX LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.

7. WHERE FOUNDATION IS INSTALLED IN SIDEWALK, A CLEAR WIDTH OF 48" MIN. SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SIDEWALK.

B H M N

(2) 2" PVC CONDUIT

NO. 7 PULLBOX

(TRAFFIC SIGNAL)

NO. 5 PULLBOX

(WIRELESS)

NO. 5 PULLBOX

(STREET

LIGHTING)

(2) 2" PVC CONDUIT

(2) 1-1/4" PVC

CONDUIT

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIGHTING

501

623

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

L

C

PEDESTAL

24" M

IN

. - 36" M

AX

.

27" M

IN

.

CU

RB

3" M

IN

.

PROFESSIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER STAMP ON FILE

TO

P O

F A

NC

HO

R B

OLT

S

5" ±

1/2" A

T S

ID

EW

ALK

6" ±

1/2" IN

O

PE

N A

RE

A

TA

PE

R

1" M

IN

. T

O S

ID

EW

ALK

2" M

IN

. T

O O

PE

N A

RE

A G

RA

DE

3" M

AX

. T

OP

O

F

FO

UN

DA

TIO

N

24" SQUARE

C LAGENCY APPROVED

UNIFORM STANDARD DRAWINGS

CLARK COUNTY AREA

DATE XX-XX-XX DWG. NO. 332

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIGHTING

501

623

SPECIFICATION REFERENCE

#4 AWG SINGLE-STRAND OR BARE,

STRANDED COPPER MULTI-STRANDED

CONDUCTOR

SERVICE PEDESTAL

ANCHOR BASE, BOLT SPACING PER

MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS

4" MIN. - 6" MAX. CONCRETE CAP

FINISHED GRADE

B H M N R

(2) 1-1/4" AND (4) 2" PVC CONDUIT (6

TOTAL) IF ONLY ONE (1) CIRCUIT IS BEING

USED, THE SECOND CIRCUIT SHALL BE

RUN TO THE PULL BOX OR STUBBED OUT

AND CAPPED FROM THE FOUNDATION.

SERVICE PEDESTAL FOUNDATION

STREET LIGHTING AND/OR TRAFFIC SIGNAL

SHEET 2 OF 2

BRONZE ANCHOR BOLT GROUNDING

CONNECTORS, UL LISTED FOR

UNDERGROUND USE (ONE PER BOLT)

SEE NOTE 1

3" PVC SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUIT

ANCHOR BOLT, TYP., 3/8" X 18" X 2"

HOT-DIP GALVANIZED WITH 2

CORROSION RESISTANT NUTS

AND 2 FLAT WASHERS PER BOLT

#4 AWG SINGLE-STRAND OR BARE,

STRANDED COPPER GROUNDING

CONDUCTOR

CONCRETE FOUNDATION

15# FELT (2 LAYERS)

GROUNDING PLATE PER NEC 250-83 OR

20' OF #4 AWG BARE, STRANDED

COPPER CONDUCTOR

SECTION

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9CF66B5A-5633-4152-9CFF-F0BB9332A5E7

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: ADAPTIVE SIGNAL PILOT PROJECT PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT 144AG-FTI2; ADAPTIVE SIGNAL PILOT PROJECT (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Funds - $650,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering 650,000.00$ -$ 650,000.00$ -$ 650,000.00$ Right-of-Way -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Construction -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Total 650,000.00$ -$ 650,000.00$ -$ 650,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration, Adaptive Signal Control Technology (ASCT) adjusts the timing of red, yellow, and green traffic lights to accommodate changing traffic patterns and ease traffic congestion. The main benefits of ASCT over conventional signal systems are that it can continuously distribute green light time equitably for all traffic movements, improve travel time reliability by progressively moving vehicles through green lights, reduce congestion by creating smoother flow, and prolong the effectiveness of traffic signal timing plans. In order to test the effectiveness of this technology, the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) is working with Clark County and the City of Henderson to deploy a pilot project on Eastern Avenue, between Beckler Drive and Pebble Road. This congested three-mile corridor should benefit from advanced ASCT. The RTC will work with the selected vendor, Clark County, and the City of Henderson to select evaluation criteria that is meaningful to road users, and commission an independent third party consultant to do the before and after studies needed to gauge the effectiveness of the system.

Respectfully submitted,

___________________________ JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

6910

DocuSign Envelope ID: B86B592B-DECE-47B4-A2EE-A63EC0F8EE0A

144AG-FTI2; Adaptive Signal Pilot Project Page 1 of 4

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ADAPTIVE SIGNAL PILOT PROJECT

THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) #1175 is made and entered into this 12TH day of March 2020, by and among the County of Clark, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; the City of Las Vegas, a municipal corporation; the City of North Las Vegas, a municipal corporation; and the City of Henderson, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to individually as “ENTITY” or collectively as “ENTITIES,” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC”. The RTC and the ENTITIES are hereinafter referred to individually as “PARTY” and collectively as “PARTIES”.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the RTC intends to commence a project to provide a proof of concept for adaptive traffic management solutions. The work shall include defining a test corridor for the adaptive traffic management solution and defining the data required pre and post implementation, hereinafter referred to as the “PROJECT.”; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statute (NRS) 277.180 authorizes any one or more public

agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal contract; and

WHEREAS, the RTC agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as

amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the ENTITIES are owners and operators of rights-of-way within their respective jurisdictions; and

WHEREAS, the RTC will take the lead role for the design of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the RTC will coordinate with and include the ENTITIES; and WHEREAS, the RTC is requesting engineering funds for the PROJECT; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed as follows:

SECTION I: SCOPE OF PROJECT

This Interlocal Contract #1175 applies to implementation of the Proof of Concept (POC) for adaptive traffic management solutions. The work will include defining a test corridor, defining the data required pre and post implementation of the POC, support in capturing the required data, location planning of any air quality monitoring, evaluating the technology and software that will be used in the POC, defining the requirements of the vendor providing the adaptive solutions.

Contract #1175

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

144AG-FTI2; Adaptive Signal Pilot Project Page 2 of 4

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS

The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension funds for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $650,000.00. 2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $650,000.00 b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00 c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $0.00

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the RTC will make all attempts to publish

the bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days. 4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts

identified in number 2 above.

SECTION III: GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and specifications shall designate the RTC as the funding agency. If construction funds are provided by sources other than the RTC, the plans, contract documents, special provisions, and PROJECT signs shall also show the RTC as a funding agency.

2. Preliminary engineering, design and right-of-way engineering shall be performed by the

RTC or by a consultant employed by the RTC.

3. The PROJECT must be completed to the satisfaction of the RTC prior to the current applicable completion date of December 31, 2025. The RTC may, at any time thereafter, grant time extensions or terminate this Contract and require all sums advanced to the RTC be repaid.

4. It is understood and agreed that the purpose of this Interlocal Contract is to fund the

PROJECT as herein above set forth. It is further understood and agreed that the RTC is responsible for the design and construction of the PROJECT. The RTC will be responsible for the actions or inactions of its Officers and Employees.

5. Should the construction funds be provided by sources other than the RTC, the RTC will

reimburse the funds for a percentage of the preliminary engineering and design costs associated with other funding sources, as mutually agreed upon by the ENTITIES.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

144AG-FTI2; Adaptive Signal Pilot Project Page 3 of 4

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract #1175 is effective as of the date first set forth above.

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BY: LAWRENCE L. BROWN, III, Chairman Approved as to Form and Legality: Attest:

RTC Legal Counsel MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst

Date of Commission Action: CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

BY: MARILYN KIRKPATRICK, Chair Approved as to Form and Legality: Attest:

Chief Deputy District Attorney LYNN MARIE GOYA, County Clerk Date of Council Action: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY: CAROLYN G. GOODMAN, Mayor Approved as to Form and Legality Attest:

Deputy City Attorney LUANN D. HOLMES, MMC, City Clerk

March 12, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

144AG-FTI2; Adaptive Signal Pilot Project Page 4 of 4

Date of Council Action: CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS

BY:

JOHN J. LEE, Mayor Approved as to Form and Legality Attest:

MICAELA RUSTIA MOORE City Attorney

CATHERINE A. RAYNOR, MMC, City Clerk

Date of Council Action:

CITY OF HENDERSON

BY:

RICHARD A. DERRICK City Manager/CEO

Approved as to Finance: Attest:

JIM MCINTOSH Chief Financial Officer

SABRINA MERCADANTE, MMC City Clerk

Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form:

EDWARD MCGUIRE, P.E. Director, Public Works

NICHOLAS G. VASKOV City Attorney

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Respectfully submitted,

DENIS CEDERBURG Director of Public Works Consent

6888 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: 2019 CLARK COUNTY, RUSSELL ROAD AND EASTERN AVENUE CONSTRUCTION

PETITIONER: DENIS CEDERBURG, DIRECTOR CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 135AH-FTI2; ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: 2019 CLARK COUNTY, RUSSELL ROAD AND EASTERN AVENUE CONSTRUCTION (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Funds – $23,000,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Right-of-Way -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Construction 23,000,000.00$ -$ 23,000,000.00$ -$ 23,000,000.00$ Total 23,000,000.00$ -$ 23,000,000.00$ -$ 23,000,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) previously approved funding for the engineering of this project through project number 135AB1, using Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funding. The design is at 90 percent and all right-of-way necessary for construction has been obtained. This interlocal will provide funds for construction so that Clark County can advertise the project.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E0631847-0D44-4820-82DE-20A039FC78E6

135AH-FTI2; Arterial Reconstruction: 2019 Clark County, Russell & Eastern Page 1 of 3

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION: 2019 CLARK COUNTY,

RUSSELL ROAD AND EASTERN AVENUE CONSTRUCTION THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is made and entered into this 12TH day of March, 2020, by and between the County of Clark, a political subdivision hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC”. W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the COUNTY intends to construct the Arterial Reconstruction: 2019 Clark County, Russell Road and Eastern Avenue Construction project, which is included on the adopted RTC Capital Improvement Plan, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within the COUNTY OF CLARK; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental services, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal agreement; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY is requesting funds to commence the construction for the PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and” NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows: SECTION I: SCOPE OF PROJECT This Interlocal Contract #1169 applies to the construction of Russell Road, Paradise Road to Mountain Vista Street and Eastern Avenue, Sunset Road to Tompkins Avenue. Improvements may include reconstruction and/or construction of travel lanes, turn lanes, median islands, paving of dirt roadways, or resurfacing of paved roads, roadway drainage facilities, traffic signals, signs, striping, curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights and other appurtenances as may be necessary to construct a compete and functional project. The project is more specifically described in Exhibit “A” which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds funding for costs associated with the PROJECT in accordance to the current Policies and Procedures, incorporated herein by reference and as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $23,000,000.00

Contract #1169

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

135AH-FTI2; Arterial Reconstruction: 2019 Clark County, Russell & Eastern Page 2 of 3

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $0.00 b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00 c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $23,000,000.00

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the COUNTY will make all attempts to

publish the bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days. 4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts

identified in number 2 above.

SECTION III: GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and specifications shall designate the RTC as the funding agency. If construction funds are provided by sources other than the RTC, the plans, contract documents, special provisions, and PROJECT signs shall also show the RTC as a funding agency.

2. Preliminary engineering, design and right-of-way engineering shall be performed by the

COUNTY or by a consultant employed by the COUNTY.

3. The design, construction, right-of-way acquisition and contract administration of the PROJECT shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the current “Policies and Procedures” of the RTC.

4. The COUNTY’s Department of Public Works has a policy which effectively prohibits

utility cuts through the pavement for a period of five years after the completion of a PROJECT.

5. Upon completion of the construction of the PROJECT, it shall be maintained by the

COUNTY and no funding is provided by this Contract for such maintenance.

6. The PROJECT must be completed to the satisfaction of the RTC prior to the current applicable completion date of June 30, 2025 The RTC may, at any time thereafter, grant time extensions or terminate this Contract and require all sums advanced to the COUNTY be repaid.

7. It is understood and agreed that the purpose of this Interlocal Contract is to fund the

PROJECT as herein above set forth. It is further understood and agreed that the COUNTY is responsible for the design and construction of the PROJECT. The COUNTY will be responsible for the actions or inactions of its Officers and Employees. The RTC’s sole responsibility is to facilitate funding for the PROJECT. The RTC disavows any responsibility for the actions or inactions of the COUNTY, its Officers, Employees, or agents.

8. Should the construction funds be provided by sources other than the RTC, the COUNTY

will reimburse the RTC for a percentage of the preliminary engineering and design costs associated with other funding sources, as mutually agreed upon by the RTC and the COUNTY.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

135AH-FTI2; Arterial Reconstruction: 2019 Clark County, Russell & Eastern Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract #1169 is effective as of the date first set forth above:

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Commission Action: COUNTY

BY:

MARILYN KIRKPATRICK, Chair Attest:

LYNN MARIE GOYA County Clerk

Approved as to Form:

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Chief Deputy District Attorney

March 12, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Exhibit A

CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

SCALE: NOT TO SCALE

DATE: 02-12-2020

SHEET NUMBER: 2 OF 2

Project Number: R135AHF

Eastern AvenueSunset Road to Tompkins Avenue

Tropicana

Eastern

Pecos

Maryland

Russell

Sunset

Tompkins

LegendProposed :

Project Site

&

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Exhibit A

CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

SCALE: NOT TO SCALE

DATE: 02-12-2020

SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 2

Project Number: R135AHF

Russell RoadParadise Road to Mountain Vista Street

Paradise

GreenValley

Eastern

Pecos

Sunset

AirportN

Conn

ector

Pecos

McLeod

Int

215

Flamingo

Tropicana

UPRRHendSpur Warm SpringsParadise

Maryland

Russell

BoulderValle

Verde

95

AirportS

Connector

Mountain Vista

LegendProposed :

Project Site

&

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Respectfully submitted,

DENIS CEDERBURG Director of Public Works Consent

6877 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: RAINBOW BOULEVARD; ERIE AVENUE TO BLUE DIAMOND ROAD PETITIONER: DENIS CEDERBURG, DIRECTOR

CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 010N-FTI2; RAINBOW BOULEVARD; ERIE AVENUE TO BLUE DIAMOND ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: None

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering -$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ -$ 1,000,000.00$ Right-of-Way -$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ Construction -$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ Total -$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,500,000.00$ -$ 1,500,000.00$

RTC Funds

The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) previously approved Interlocal Contract #1152 for Rainbow Boulevard; Erie Avenue to Blue Diamond Road for engineering, right-of-way, and construction. The original contract was intended to cover project costs incurred from July 1, 2019, but was inadvertently left out of the original contract. This Supplement will correct the issue.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E0631847-0D44-4820-82DE-20A039FC78E6

010N-FTI2; Rainbow Boulevard: Erie Avenue to Blue Diamond Road Page 1 of 2

Contract #1152A

SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 RAINBOW BOULEVARD,

ERIE AVENUE TO BLUE DIAMOND ROAD

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 is made and entered into this 12TH day of March 2020, by and between Clark County, a political subdivision, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.”

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, the RTC approved Interlocal Contract #1152 dated December 12, 2019, for improvements to Rainbow Boulevard, Erie Avenue to Blue Diamond Road, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within Clark County; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental services, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal contract; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the RTC previously granted “Authorization to Proceed” for engineering, right-of-way, and construction for the PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY wishes to correct the project start date; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS; shall be revised to read as follows:

The RTC agrees to reimburse funds advanced by the COUNTY for eligible PROJECT costs incurred after July 1, 2019.

The remainder of Interlocal Contract #1152 dated December 12, 2019, shall remain unchanged.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

010N-FTI2; Rainbow Boulevard: Erie Avenue to Blue Diamond Road Page 2 of 2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Supplemental Interlocal Contract No. 1 is effective as of the date first set forth above:

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

March 12, 2019 BY: LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman

Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst

Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel

Date of Commission Action: CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

BY: MARILYN KIRKPATRICK, Chair

Attest

LYNN MARIE GOYA County Clerk

Approved as to Form

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Chief Deputy District Attorney

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ DENIS CEDERBURG, P.E. Director of Public Works Consent

6901 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: CACTUS AVENUE, VERONA WOOD STREET TO POLARIS AVENUE PETITIONER: DENIS CEDERBURG, DIRECTOR

CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 147C-FTI2; CACTUS AVENUE, VERONA WOOD STREET TO POLARIS AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Funds – $1,000,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Right-of-Way -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Construction 1,000,000.00$ 9,000,000.00$ 10,000,000.00$ -$ 10,000,000.00$ Total 1,000,000.00$ 9,000,000.00$ 10,000,000.00$ -$ 10,000,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) previously approved funding for the construction of the subject project. Construction will begin soon. Additional funds are now needed for construction management and in-house labor costs.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E0631847-0D44-4820-82DE-20A039FC78E6

Contract #1089A

147C-FTI2; Cactus Avenue, Verona Wood Street to Polaris Avenue Page 1 of 3

SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 CACTUS AVENUE,

VERONA WOOD STREET TO POLARIS AVENUE

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 1 is made and entered into this 12TH day of March 2020, by and between Clark County, a political subdivision, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.”

W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the RTC approved Interlocal Contract #1089 dated June 13, 2019, for Cactus Avenue from Verona Wood Street to Polaris Avenue, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within Clark County; and WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental services, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal contract; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the RTC previously granted “Authorization to Proceed” for construction for the PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY wishes to increase total PROJECT funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS; shall be revised to read as follows: The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $10,000,000.00.

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $0.00 b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00 c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $10,000,000.00

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the COUNTY will make all attempts to

publish the bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

147C-FTI2: 1089_Cactus Ave: Verona Wood St/Polaris Ave Page 2 of 3

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts identified in number 2 above.

The remainder of Interlocal Contract #1089 dated June 13, 2019, shall remain unchanged.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

147C-FTI2: 1089_Cactus Ave: Verona Wood St/Polaris Ave Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Supplemental Interlocal Contract No. 1 is effective as

of the date first set forth above:

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

March 12, 2020 BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Commission Action: CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

BY:

MARILYN KIRKPATRICK, Chair Attest

LYNN MARIE GOYA County Clerk

Approved as to Form

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Chief Deputy District Attorney

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Respectfully submitted, _______________________________ DENIS CEDERBURG, P.E. Director of Public Works Consent

6902 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD, CHARLESTON BOULEVARD TO LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD PETITIONER: DENIS CEDERBURG, DIRECTOR CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 5 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 099C-MVFT; HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD, CHARLESTON BOULEVARD TO LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Funds – $750,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering -$ 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ -$ 450,000.00$ Right-of-Way (50,000.00)$ 50,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ Construction 800,000.00$ 7,550,000.00$ 8,350,000.00$ -$ 8,350,000.00$ Total 750,000.00$ 8,050,000.00$ 8,800,000.00$ -$ 8,800,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND: The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) previously approved funding for construction, engineering, and right-of-way for the subject project. The project is currently under construction. This supplemental request is required to cover Clark County internal labor costs.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E0631847-0D44-4820-82DE-20A039FC78E6

Contract # 730E

099C-MVFT: Hollywood Boulevard, Charleston Boulevard to Lake Mead Boulevard Page 1 of 3

SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 5 HOLLYWOOD BOULEVARD, CHARLESTON BOULEVARD TO LAKE MEAD

BOULEVARD THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 5 is made and entered into this 12TH day of March 2020, by and between Clark County, a political subdivision, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.”

W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the RTC approved Interlocal Contract #730 dated September 12, 2013, and supplemental interlocal contracts dated June 14, 2018, January 10, 2019, July 11, 2019, and January 9, 2020, for improvements to Hollywood Boulevard, Charleston Boulevard to Lake Mead Boulevard, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within Clark County; and WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental services, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal contract; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the RTC previously granted “Authorization to Proceed” for engineering, right-of-way, and construction for the PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY wishes to increase total PROJECT funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS; shall be revised to read as follows: The RTC agrees to provide Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $8,800,000.00.

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $450,000.00 b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00 c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $8,350,000.00

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the COUNTY will make all attempts to

publish the bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Contract # 730E

099C-MVFT: Hollywood Boulevard, Charleston Boulevard to Lake Mead Boulevard Page 2 of 3

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts identified in number 2 above.

The remainder of Interlocal Contract #730 dated September 12, 2013, and supplemental interlocal contracts dated June 14, 2018, January 10, 2019, July 11, 2019, and January 9, 2020, shall remain unchanged.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Contract # 730E

099C-MVFT: Hollywood Boulevard, Charleston Boulevard to Lake Mead Boulevard Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Supplemental Interlocal Contract No. 5 is effective as

of the date first set forth above:

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

March 12, 2020 BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Commission Action: CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

BY:

MARILYN KIRKPATRICK, Chair Attest

LYNN MARIE GOYA County Clerk

Approved as to Form

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Chief Deputy District Attorney

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD, STEWART AVENUE TO SAHARA AVENUE PETITIONER: MIKE JANSSEN, DIRECTOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 089P-FTI2; LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD, STEWART AVENUE TO SAHARA AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND AIR QUALITY BY MANAGING CONGESTION

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Funds - $109,000,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 -$ Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 -$ Construction $109,000,000 $0 $109,000,000 $0 109,000,000.00$ Other Funds $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000 10,500,000.00$ Total $109,000,000 $0 $109,000,000 $10,500,000 119,500,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND: The City of Las Vegas requests funding to proceed with the construction of the project. This is a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) project, and will be based on the negotiated Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) with Las Vegas Paving Corporation. The basic improvements include replacing pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalks, traffic signal upgrades, utility relocation, street lighting, Intelligent Systems of Transportation enhancements, new storm drain, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, Complete Street elements as feasible, street trees and landscaping. The design engineering was completed and right-of-way rights have been obtained through projects 089K-FTI, 089G-Q10 and 089G-FTI2. Respectfully submitted, _______________________________ MIKE JANSSEN Director of Public Works Consent

6904

DocuSign Envelope ID: C664DDCF-15CE-4F31-A3AB-77088118BC54

for

Item Cost

Cost of Work  $80,500,000.00

General Conditions $7,860,349.44

CMAR's Fee $5,635,000.00

CMAR's Contingency $805,000.00

Owner's Contingency $14,649,650.56

GMP $109,450,000.00

Construction Management $6,089,664.00

LVVWD Contingency  $619,380.60

Utility service fees and public outreach  $2,500,000.00

CA Group Modification  $360,000.00

Total $119,019,044.60

Item Cost

Cost of Work  $72,555,582.50

General Conditions $7,084,624.00

CMAR's Fee $5,078,890.78

CMAR's Contingency $805,000.00

Owner's Contingency $14,649,650.56

Construction Management $8,706,669.90

SubTotal  $108,880,417.74

Item  Cost 

Construction Costs  $6,193,806.00

CMAR Fee and General Conditions  $1,038,354.99

LVVWD Contingency $619,380.60

CM $468,549.04

Total  $8,320,090.63

Item Cost

Cost of Work  $1,231,411.50

General Conditions $120,240.06

CMAR's Fee $86,198.81

CMAR's Contingency $0.00

Owner's Contingency $0.00

Construction Management $93,153.82

Total $1,531,004.19

LVVWD Interlocal (Main) Amendment 1

Total Construction Cost 

RTC Funding

CLV Sanitation Fund

Item Cost

Cost of Work  $326,300.00

General Conditions $31,861.27

CMAR's Fee $22,841.00

CMAR's Contingency $0.00

Owner's Contingency $0.00

Construction Management $24,683.94

Total $405,686.21

Item Cost

Cost of Work  $192,900.00

General Conditions $18,835.55

CMAR's Fee $13,503.00

CMAR's Contingency $0.00

Owner's Contingency $0.00

Construction Management $14,592.50

Total $239,831.05

5 Cent Prop Tax

Centennial Commission 

089P-FTI2: Las Vegas Boulevard, Stewart Avenue to Sahara Avenue Page 1 of 3

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD, STEWART AVENUE TO SAHARA AVENUE

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is made and entered into this 12TH day of March, 2020, by and between the City of Las Vegas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.”

W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the CITY intends to construct improvements to Las Vegas Boulevard, Stewart Avenue to Sahara Avenue, which is included on the adopted RTC Capital Improvements Plan, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within the City of Las Vegas; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal agreement; and

WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the CITY is requesting funds to commence construction of the PROJECT;

and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION I: SCOPE OF PROJECT This Interlocal Contract #1170 applies to roadway improvements associated with Las Vegas Boulevard, Stewart Avenue to Sahara Avenue. The basic improvements include replacing pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalks, traffic signal upgrades, utility relocation, street lighting, Intelligent Systems of Transportation improvements, new storm drain, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, complete street elements as feasible, street trees and landscaping and any other appurtenances necessary to construct a complete and functional project. The project limits are more specifically defined in Exhibit “A” which is hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $109,000,000.00.

Contract #1170

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

089P-FTI2: Las Vegas Boulevard, Stewart Avenue to Sahara Avenue Page 2 of 3

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $0.00 b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00 c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $109,000,000.00

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the CITY will make all attempts to finalize

the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days.

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts identified in number 2 above.

SECTION III: GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and specifications shall designate the RTC as the funding agency. If construction funds are provided by sources other than the RTC, the plans, contract documents, special provisions, and PROJECT signs shall also show the RTC as a funding agency.

2. Preliminary engineering, design and right-of-way engineering shall be performed by the

CITY or by a consultant employed by the CITY.

3. The design, construction, right-of-way acquisition and contract administration of the PROJECT shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the current “Policies and Procedures” of the RTC.

4. The CITY’s Department of Public Works has a policy which effectively prohibits utility

cuts through the pavement for a period of five years after the completion of a PROJECT.

5. Upon completion of the construction of the PROJECT, it shall be maintained by the CITY and no funding is provided by this Contract for such maintenance.

6. The PROJECT must be completed to the satisfaction of the RTC prior to the current

applicable completion date of June 30, 2025. The RTC may, at any time thereafter, grant time extensions or terminate this Contract and require all sums advanced to the CITY be repaid.

7. It is understood and agreed that the purpose of this Interlocal Contract is to fund the

PROJECT as herein above set forth. It is further understood and agreed that the CITY is responsible for the design and construction of the PROJECT. The CITY will be responsible for the actions or inactions of its Officers and Employees. The RTC’s sole responsibility is to facilitate funding for the PROJECT. The RTC disavows any responsibility for the actions or inactions of the CITY, its Officers, Employees, or agents.

8. Should the construction funds be provided by sources other than the RTC, the CITY will

reimburse the RTC for a percentage of the preliminary engineering and design costs associated with other funding sources, as mutually agreed upon by the RTC and the CITY.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

089P-FTI2: Las Vegas Boulevard, Stewart Avenue to Sahara Avenue Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract #1170 is effective as of the date first set forth above.

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Council Action: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY:

CAROLYN G. GOODMAN, Mayor Attest:

LUANN D. HOLMES, MMC City Clerk

Approved as to Form:

Deputy City Attorney Date

March 12, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

59¤

§̈¦15

MA

IN S

T

LA

S V

EG

AS

BLV

D

STEWART AVE

3R

D S

T

UP

RR

CHARLESTON BLVD

FREMONT ST

SAHARA AVE

N:\pavement\RWPGIS\Greg\Exhibit As\Las Vegas Blvd South Exhibit A.mxd

¯1/29/2020

EXHIBIT ALAS VEGAS BOULEVARD,STEWART AVE TO SAHARA AVE

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AT WESTWIND ROAD AND UPLAND BOULEVARD

PETITIONER: MIKE JANSSEN, DIRECTOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 223L-FTI2; INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AT WESTWIND ROAD AND UPLAND BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND AIR QUALITY BY MANAGING CONGESTION

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Funds - $375,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering 375,000.00$ 375,000.00$ -$ 375,000.00$ Right-of-Way -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Construction -$ -$ -$ -$Total 375,000.00$ -$ 375,000.00$ -$ 375,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

The City of Las Vegas requests funding to commence engineering services for intersection improvements at Charleston Boulevard, Westwind Road and Upland Boulevard. The work will include traffic operations analysis, development of intersection design alternatives to improve traffic operations, and cost-benefit calculations for each alternative.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ MIKE JANSSEN Director of Public Works Consent

6905

DocuSign Envelope ID: C664DDCF-15CE-4F31-A3AB-77088118BC54

for

223L-FTI2: Charleston Boulevard, Westwind Rd/Upland Blvd Page 1 of 3

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: CHARLESTON BOULEVARD,

WESTWIND ROAD AND UPLAND BOULEVARD

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is made and entered into this 12TH day of March, 2020, by and between the City of Las Vegas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.”

W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the CITY intends to design intersection improvements to Charleston Boulevard as it intersects with Westwind Road and Upland Boulevard, which is included on the adopted RTC Capital Improvements Plan, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within the City of Las Vegas; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal agreement; and

WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the CITY is requesting funds to commence engineering for the PROJECT;

and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION I: SCOPE OF PROJECT This Interlocal Contract #1171 applies to engineering services associated with improvements to the intersection of Charleston Boulevard at Westwind Road and Upland Boulevard. The work will include traffic operations analysis, development of intersection design alternatives to improve traffic operations, and cost-benefit calculations for each alternative. The project limits are more specifically defined in Exhibit “A” which is hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $375,000.00. 2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $375,000.00 b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00 c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $0.00

Contract #1171

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

223L-FTI2: Charleston Boulevard, Westwind Rd/Upland Blvd Page 2 of 3

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the CITY will make all attempts to publish

the bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days.

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts identified in number 2 above.

SECTION III: GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and specifications shall designate the RTC as the funding agency. If construction funds are provided by sources other than the RTC, the plans, contract documents, special provisions, and PROJECT signs shall also show the RTC as a funding agency.

2. Preliminary engineering, design and right-of-way engineering shall be performed by the

CITY or by a consultant employed by the CITY.

3. The design, construction, right-of-way acquisition and contract administration of the PROJECT shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the current “Policies and Procedures” of the RTC.

4. The CITY’s Department of Public Works has a policy which effectively prohibits utility

cuts through the pavement for a period of five years after the completion of a PROJECT.

5. Upon completion of the construction of the PROJECT, it shall be maintained by the CITY and no funding is provided by this Contract for such maintenance.

6. The PROJECT must be completed to the satisfaction of the RTC prior to the current

applicable completion date of June 30, 2025. The RTC may, at any time thereafter, grant time extensions or terminate this Contract and require all sums advanced to the CITY be repaid.

7. It is understood and agreed that the purpose of this Interlocal Contract is to fund the

PROJECT as herein above set forth. It is further understood and agreed that the CITY is responsible for the design and construction of the PROJECT. The CITY will be responsible for the actions or inactions of its Officers and Employees. The RTC’s sole responsibility is to facilitate funding for the PROJECT. The RTC disavows any responsibility for the actions or inactions of the CITY, its Officers, Employees, or agents.

8. Should the construction funds be provided by sources other than the RTC, the CITY will

reimburse the RTC for a percentage of the preliminary engineering and design costs associated with other funding sources, as mutually agreed upon by the RTC and the CITY.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

223L-FTI2: Charleston Boulevard, Westwind Rd/Upland Blvd Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract #1171 is effective as of the date first set forth above.

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Council Action: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY:

CAROLYN G. GOODMAN, Mayor Attest:

LUANN D. HOLMES, MMC City Clerk

Approved as to Form:

Deputy City Attorney Date

March 12, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

JO

NE

S B

LV

D

CHARLESTON BLVD

UP

LA

ND

BL

VD

WE

ST

WIN

D R

D

BR

US

H S

T

EVERGREEN AVE

DE

CA

TU

R B

LV

D

N:\pavement\RWPGIS\Greg\Exhibit As\Charleston_Westwind_Upland Exhibit A.mxd

¯1/28/2020

EXHIBIT ACHARLESTON BOULEVARD & WESTWIND RD/UPLAND BLVDINTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: 8TH STREET, BRIDGER AVENUE TO STEWART AVENUE PETITIONER: MIKE JANSSEN, DIRECTOR

CITY OF LAS VEGAS PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 235A-FTI2; 8TH STREET, BRIDGER AVENUE TO STEWART AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND AIR QUALITY BY MANAGING CONGESTION

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Funds - $750,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering 750,000.00$ 750,000.00$ -$ 750,000.00$ Right-of-Way -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Construction -$ -$ -$ -$Total 750,000.00$ -$ 750,000.00$ -$ 750,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

The City of Las Vegas requests funding to commence design engineering for the 8th Street, Bridger Avenue to Stewart Avenue project. The work shall include preliminary design, right-of-way evaluation, right-of-way acquisition, and final design. Specifically, these improvements may include curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, intersection improvements, pedestrian and bicycle safety upgrades, street trees, and any other appurtenant items necessary for a complete project.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ MIKE JANSSEN Director of Public Works Consent

6906

DocuSign Envelope ID: C664DDCF-15CE-4F31-A3AB-77088118BC54

for

235A-FTI2: 8th Street, Bridger Avenue to Stewart Avenue Page 1 of 3

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT 8TH STREET, BRIDGER AVENUE TO STEWART AVENUE

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is made and entered into this 12TH day of March, 2020, by and between the City of Las Vegas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.”

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, the CITY intends to design improvements to 8th Street, Bridger Avenue to Stewart Avenue, which is included on the adopted RTC Capital Improvements Plan, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within the City of Las Vegas; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal agreement; and

WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the CITY is requesting funds to commence engineering for the PROJECT; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION I: SCOPE OF PROJECT

This Interlocal Contract #1170 applies to roadway improvements associated with 8th Street, Bridger Avenue to Stewart Avenue. The improvements may include pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalks, traffic signal modifications, utility relocation, upgraded street lighting, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, complete street elements as feasible, street trees and landscape and any other appurtenances necessary to construct a complete and functional project. The project limits are more specifically defined in Exhibit “A” which is hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS

The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $750,000.00.

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $750,000.00b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $0.00

Contract #1170

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

235A-FTI2: 8th Street, Bridger Avenue to Stewart Avenue Page 2 of 3

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the CITY will make all attempts to publish the bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days.

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts identified in number 2 above.

SECTION III: GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and specifications shall designate the RTC as the funding agency. If construction funds are provided by sources other than the RTC, the plans, contract documents, special provisions, and PROJECT signs shall also show the RTC as a funding agency.

2. Preliminary engineering, design and right-of-way engineering shall be performed by the

CITY or by a consultant employed by the CITY.

3. The design, construction, right-of-way acquisition and contract administration of the PROJECT shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the current “Policies and Procedures” of the RTC.

4. The CITY’s Department of Public Works has a policy which effectively prohibits utility

cuts through the pavement for a period of five years after the completion of a PROJECT.

5. Upon completion of the construction of the PROJECT, it shall be maintained by the CITY and no funding is provided by this Contract for such maintenance.

6. The PROJECT must be completed to the satisfaction of the RTC prior to the current

applicable completion date of June 30, 2025. The RTC may, at any time thereafter, grant time extensions or terminate this Contract and require all sums advanced to the CITY be repaid.

7. It is understood and agreed that the purpose of this Interlocal Contract is to fund the

PROJECT as herein above set forth. It is further understood and agreed that the CITY is responsible for the design and construction of the PROJECT. The CITY will be responsible for the actions or inactions of its Officers and Employees. The RTC’s sole responsibility is to facilitate funding for the PROJECT. The RTC disavows any responsibility for the actions or inactions of the CITY, its Officers, Employees, or agents.

8. Should the construction funds be provided by sources other than the RTC, the CITY will

reimburse the RTC for a percentage of the preliminary engineering and design costs associated with other funding sources, as mutually agreed upon by the RTC and the CITY.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

235A-FTI2: 8th Street, Bridger Avenue to Stewart Avenue Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract #1170 is effective as of the date first set forth above.

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Council Action: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY:

CAROLYN G. GOODMAN, Mayor Attest:

LUANN D. HOLMES, MMC City Clerk

Approved as to Form:

Deputy City Attorney Date

March 12, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

MA

IN S

T

OGDEN AVE

LA

S V

EG

AS

BLV

D

STEWART AVE

3R

D S

T

BRIDGER AVE

8TH

STR

EE

T

FREMONT ST

N:\pavement\RWPGIS\Greg\Exhibit As\8th Street Exhibit A.mxd

¯1/28/2020

EXHIBIT A8TH STREET,BRIDGER AVENUE TO STEWART AVENUE

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: IMPERIAL AVENUE, COMMERCE STREET TO 3RD STREET PETITIONER: MIKE JANSSEN, DIRECTOR

CITY OF LAS VEGAS PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 236A-FTI2; IMPERIAL AVENUE, COMMERCE STREET TO 3RD STREET (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND AIR QUALITY BY MANAGING CONGESTION

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Funds - $750,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering 750,000.00$ 750,000.00$ -$ 750,000.00$ Right-of-Way -$ -$ -$ -$ -$Construction -$ -$ -$ -$Total 750,000.00$ -$ 750,000.00$ -$ 750,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

The City of Las Vegas requests funding to commence design engineering for the Imperial Avenue, Commerce Street to 3rd Street project. The work shall include preliminary design, right-of-way evaluation, right-of-way acquisition, and final design. Specifically, these improvements may include curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, intersection improvements, pedestrian and bicycle safety upgrades, street trees, and any other appurtenant items necessary for a complete project.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ MIKE JANSSEN Director of Public Works Consent

6907

DocuSign Envelope ID: C664DDCF-15CE-4F31-A3AB-77088118BC54

for

236A-FTI2: Imperial Avenue, Commerce Street to 3rd Street Page 1 of 3

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT IMPERIAL AVENUE, COMMERCE STREET TO 3RD STREET

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is made and entered into this 12TH day of March, 2020, by and between the City of Las Vegas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.”

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, the CITY intends to design improvements to Imperial Avenue, Commerce Street to 3rd Street, which is included on the adopted RTC Capital Improvements Plan, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within the City of Las Vegas; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal agreement; and

WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the CITY is requesting funds to commence engineering for the PROJECT; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION I: SCOPE OF PROJECT

This Interlocal Contract #1172 applies to roadway improvements associated with the Imperial Avenue, Commerce Street to 3rd Street project. The improvements may include pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalks, traffic signal modifications, utility relocation, upgraded street lighting, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, complete street elements as feasible, street trees and landscape, and any other appurtenances necessary to construct a complete and functional project. The project limits are more specifically defined in Exhibit “A” which is hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS

The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $750,000.00.

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $750,000.00b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $0.00

Contract #1172

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

236A-FTI2: Imperial Avenue, Commerce Street to 3rd Street Page 2 of 3

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the CITY will make all attempts to publishthe bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days.

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amountsidentified in number 2 above.

SECTION III: GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and specifications shall designate the RTC as the fundingagency. If construction funds are provided by sources other than the RTC, the plans,contract documents, special provisions, and PROJECT signs shall also show the RTC as afunding agency.

2. Preliminary engineering, design and right-of-way engineering shall be performed by theCITY or by a consultant employed by the CITY.

3. The design, construction, right-of-way acquisition and contract administration of thePROJECT shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the current “Policies andProcedures” of the RTC.

4. The CITY’s Department of Public Works has a policy which effectively prohibits utilitycuts through the pavement for a period of five years after the completion of a PROJECT.

5. Upon completion of the construction of the PROJECT, it shall be maintained by the CITYand no funding is provided by this Contract for such maintenance.

6. The PROJECT must be completed to the satisfaction of the RTC prior to the currentapplicable completion date of June 30, 2025. The RTC may, at any time thereafter, granttime extensions or terminate this Contract and require all sums advanced to the CITY berepaid.

7. It is understood and agreed that the purpose of this Interlocal Contract is to fund thePROJECT as herein above set forth. It is further understood and agreed that the CITY isresponsible for the design and construction of the PROJECT. The CITY will be responsiblefor the actions or inactions of its Officers and Employees. The RTC’s sole responsibility isto facilitate funding for the PROJECT. The RTC disavows any responsibility for theactions or inactions of the CITY, its Officers, Employees, or agents.

8. Should the construction funds be provided by sources other than the RTC, the CITY willreimburse the RTC for a percentage of the preliminary engineering and design costsassociated with other funding sources, as mutually agreed upon by the RTC and the CITY.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

236A-FTI2: Imperial Avenue, Commerce Street to 3rd Street Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract #1172 is effective as of the date first set forth above.

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BY: LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman

Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst

Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel

Date of Council Action: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY: CAROLYN G. GOODMAN, Mayor

Attest:

LUANN D. HOLMES, MMC City Clerk

Approved as to Form:

Deputy City Attorney Date

March 12, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

LA

S V

EG

AS

BLV

D

UTAH AVE

UP

RR

IMPERIAL AVE

3R

D S

T

CO

MM

ER

CE

ST

WYOMING AVE

COLORADO AVE

N:\pavement\RWPGIS\Greg\Exhibit As\Imperial Ave Exhibit A.mxd

¯1/27/2020

EXHIBIT AIMPERIAL AVENUE,COMMERCE STREET TO 3RD STREET

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: CITYWIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES PETITIONER: MIKE JANSSEN, DIRECTOR

CITY OF LAS VEGAS PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 2 TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 228A-MVFT; CITYWIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Funding - $300,000.00

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering -$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,500,000.00$ -$ 1,500,000.00$ Right-of-Way 300,000.00$ -$ 300,000.00$ -$ 300,000.00$ Construction -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total 300,000.00$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,800,000.00$ -$ 1,800,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

This contract has allowed the City of Las Vegas (Las Vegas) to design solutions to citywide traffic issues that are identified throughout the year. At this time, Las Vegas has identified areas where additional right-of-way is necessary to mitigate traffic issues. This supplement will allocate funds to obtain any right-of-way necessary to complete the projects.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ MIKE JANSSEN Director of Public Works Consent

6908

DocuSign Envelope ID: C664DDCF-15CE-4F31-A3AB-77088118BC54

for

228A-MVFT-1094b: Citywide Traffic Engineering Design Program Page 1 of 3

SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 2 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 2 is made and entered into this 12TH day of March 2020, by and between the City of Las Vegas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC”.

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, the RTC approved Interlocal Contract #1094 dated July 11, 2019 and supplemental interlocal contract dated November 14, 2019 for Citywide Traffic Engineering Design Services, which is included on the adopted RTC Capital Improvement Plan, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within the City of Las Vegas; and

WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statue (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal agreement; and

WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the RTC previously granted “Authorization to Proceed” for engineering for the PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, the CITY wishes to increase total PROJECT funding for right-of-way for the PROJECT; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS; shall be revised to read as follows:

The RTC agrees to provide Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $1,800,000.00.

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $1,500,000.00b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $300,000.00c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $0.00

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the CITY will make all attempts to publishthe bid or issue a Notice to Proceed if utilizing annual maintenance contracts for thisPROJECT within 90 calendar days.

Contract #1094B

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

228A-MVFT-1094b: Citywide Traffic Engineering Design Program Page 2 of 3

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amountsidentified in number 2 above.

The remainder of the Interlocal Contract #1094 dated July 11, 2019, and supplemental

interlocal contract dated November 14, 2019, shall remain unchanged.

The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

228A-MVFT-1094b: Citywide Traffic Engineering Design Program Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Supplemental Interlocal Contract No. 2 is effective as of the date first set forth above.

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Council Action: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

BY:

CAROLYN G. GOODMAN, Mayor Attest:

LUANN D. HOLMES, MMC City Clerk

Approved as to Form:

Deputy City Attorney Date

March 12, 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

Respectfully submitted,

DALE DAFFERN, P.E. Director of Public Works Consent

6903

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS PETITIONER: DALE DAFFERN, P.E., DIRECTOR

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING FROM FUEL REVENUE INDEXING EXTENSION FUNDS FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 176J-FTI2; DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Fund– $3,675,000

Category Other Funds Total Project CostsCurrent Request Previous Request Total RTC

Engineering -$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,500,000.00$ -$ 1,500,000.00$ Right-of-Way -$ 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ -$ 200,000.00$ Construction 3,675,000.00$ -$ 3,675,000.00$ -$ 3,675,000.00$ Total 3,675,000.00$ 1,700,000.00$ 5,375,000.00$ -$ 5,375,000.00$

RTC Funds

BACKGROUND:

The design and right-of-way costs for the project was funded by the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada project 176F-FTI2

This City of North Las Vegas is requesting funding to commence construction of the subject project. This project includes construction of Phase I of the Downtown Complete Streets and Pedestrian Improvement Project. The project design is at 90 percent, and all necessary right-of-way has been obtained.

DocuSign Envelope ID: AC0F70BB-932E-450D-827B-42D72E4CFF39

176J-FTI2 Downtown Complete Streets and Pedestrian Improvements Page 1 of 3

Contract # 1174

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT DOWNTOWN COMPLETE STREETS AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS

THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT is made and entered into this 12 TH day of March, 2020, by and between the City of North Las Vegas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, hereinafter referred to as “RTC.” W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the CITY intends to improve Downtown Complete Streets and Pedestrian Improvements Project, which is included on the adopted RTC Capital Improvement Plan, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT,” located wholly within the City Of North Las Vegas; and WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statute (NRS) Chapter 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental services, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform and refers to such as an interlocal contract; and WHEREAS, the CITY agrees to conform to the current RTC Policies and Procedures, as amended and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, the CITY is requesting funds to commence construction, of the PROJECT; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and promises of the Parties hereto, the Parties agree to proceed as follows:

SECTION I: SCOPE OF PROJECT This Interlocal Contract #1174 applies to improvements to the Downtown Complete Streets and Pedestrian Improvements Project. The Phase I improvements may include removal/replacement of various sections of poor visibility/incomplete/inadequate crosswalks, and upgrades include installation of Light Emitting Diodes (LED) lights, bike paths, safe-walkable routes, other items necessary for pedestrian safety, and other miscellaneous appurtenances to complete the PROJECT. The Project is more specifically described in Exhibit “A” which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. SECTION II: PROJECT COSTS The RTC agrees to provide Fuel Revenue Indexing Extension Fund funding for all costs associated with the PROJECT as outlined below:

1. The total cost for this contract shall not exceed $3,675,000.00.

2. Authorizations to Proceed (ATP) are granted as follows:

a. ENGINEERING not to exceed $0.00

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

176J- FTI2 Downtown Complete Streets and Pedestrian Improvements Page 2 of 3

b. RIGHT-OF-WAY not to exceed $0.00 c. CONSTRUCTION not to exceed $3,675,000.00

3. At the time the ATP for construction is granted, the CITY will make all attempts to publish

the bid for this PROJECT within 90 calendar days.

4. A supplemental interlocal contract will be required for any changes to the amounts identified in number 2 above.

SECTION III: GENERAL

1. The title sheet of both the plans and specifications shall designate the RTC as the funding

agency. If construction funds are provided by sources other than the RTC, the plans, contract documents, special provisions, and PROJECT signs shall also show the RTC as a funding agency.

2. Preliminary engineering, design and right-of-way engineering shall be performed by the

CITY or by a consultant employed by the CITY.

3. The design, construction, right-of-way acquisition and contract administration of the PROJECT shall comply with the requirements as set forth in the current “Policies and Procedures” of the RTC.

4. The CITY’s Department of Public Works has a policy which effectively prohibits utility

cuts through the pavement for a period of five years after the completion of a PROJECT.

5. Upon completion of the construction of the PROJECT, it shall be maintained by the CITY and no funding is provided by this Contract for such maintenance.

6. The PROJECT must be completed to the satisfaction of the RTC prior to the current

applicable completion date of December 31, 2024. The RTC may, at any time thereafter, grant time extensions or terminate this Contract and require all sums advanced to the CITY be repaid.

7. It is understood and agreed that the purpose of this Interlocal Contract is to fund the

PROJECT as herein above set forth. It is further understood and agreed that the CITY is responsible for the design and construction of the PROJECT. The CITY will be responsible for the actions or inactions of its Officers and Employees. The RTC’s sole responsibility is to facilitate funding for the PROJECT. The RTC disavows any responsibility for the actions or inactions of the CITY, its Officers, Employees, or agents.

8. Should the construction funds be provided by sources other than the RTC, the CITY will

reimburse the RTC for a percentage of the preliminary engineering and design costs associated with other funding sources, as mutually agreed upon by the RTC and the CITY. The remainder of this page is left intentionally blank.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

176J- FTI2 Downtown Complete Streets and Pedestrian Improvements Page 3 of 3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Interlocal Contract #1174 is effective as of the date first set forth above:

Date of Commission Action: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

March 12, 2020 BY:

LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, Chairman Attest:

MARIN DUBOIS, Management Analyst Approved as to Form:

RTC Legal Counsel Date of Council Action: CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS

BY:

JOHN J. LEE, MAYOR Attest

CATHERINE A. RAYNOR, MMC City Clerk

Approved as to Form

MICAELA RUSTIA MOORE City Attorney

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

DocuSign Envelope ID: B3580DC6-3E06-41C7-9E0E-971C29F58B8F

KEEGAN LITTRELL, P.E. Director of Public Works Consent

6876

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID PETITIONER: KEEGAN LITTRELL, P.E., DIRECTOR

CITY OF BOULDER CITY PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX DIRECT DISTRIBUTION FUNDS FOR CITY OF BOULDER CITY PROJECT 175T-MVFT; NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION: FISCAL YEAR 2020 CITY OF BOULDER CITY MAINTENANCE TO AMERICAN PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FOR $439,919.49 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE

FISCAL IMPACT: None

Project No. Engineer's Estimate400,000.00$ RTC Funds Other Funds Total

175T-MVFT 700,000.00$ -$ 700,000.00$ Other Funds -$ -$ -$ Total 400,000.00$ 700,000.00$ -$ 700,000.00$

Bid Amount

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada approved the Interlocal Contract on October 10, 2019, to provide funding for maintenance project 175T-MVFT; Neighborhood Rehabilitation: Fiscal Year 2020 City of Boulder City Maintenance.

Bids were opened on December 19, 2019. Two bids were received, ranging from $439,919.49 to $499,299.90. Per Nevada Revised Statue 338.143, staff evaluated the bids and determined the lowest responsive and responsible bidder is American Pavement Preservation, with a bid amount of $439,919.49, which is 9.98 percent more than the engineer’s estimate.

Respectfully submitted,

DocuSign Envelope ID: 54467334-83ED-4616-9088-9D2FF6225AFC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 54467334-83ED-4616-9088-9D2FF6225AFC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 54467334-83ED-4616-9088-9D2FF6225AFC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 54467334-83ED-4616-9088-9D2FF6225AFC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 54467334-83ED-4616-9088-9D2FF6225AFC

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

FISCAL IMPACT: None

Project No. Engineer's Estimate 3,240,975.00$ RTC Funds Other Funds Total

215A-Q10 189,621.57$ -$ 189,621.57$ NDOT-P481-16-063 -$ 3,385,323.84$ 3,385,323.84$

3,240,975.00$ 189,621.57$ 3,385,323.84$ 3,574,945.41$

Bid Amount

BACKGROUND:

On September 12, 2019, bids were opened for the CC-215 Beltway Trail Segment A, Tenaya Way to Decatur Boulevard project. Five bids were received for bid amounts ranging from $3,574,945.41 to $4,844,472.00. The recommended best bid is to CMMMC, LLC, doing business as Muller Construction, with a bid amount of $3,574,945.41, which is 10.3 percent above the engineer’s estimateof $3,240,975.00. A tabulation of bids is attached. Segment B of the trail, between Tenaya Wayand Grand Montecito Parkway, will be constructed by the Nevada Department of Transportation with the Centennial Bowl improvements. Segment C of the trail, between Grand Montecito Parkway and Centennial Parkway, will be constructed by the City of Las Vegas in Fiscal Year 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ MIKE JANSSEN Director of Public Works Consent

6909

DocuSign Envelope ID: C664DDCF-15CE-4F31-A3AB-77088118BC54

for

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID PETITIONER: MIKE JANSSEN, DIRECTOR

CITY OF LAS VEGAS PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECEIVE A REPORT OF AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION FROM QUESTION 10 FUNDS FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 215A-Q10; CC-215 BELTWAY TRAIL, CENTENNIAL PARKWAY TO DECATUR BOULEVARD TO CMMMC, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS MULLER CONSTRUCTION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,574,945.41 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: INCREASE SAFETY FOR BOTH MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED USERS

City of Las Vegas Bid Abstract Page 1 of 3

Item # Description QTY UOM Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price107.01 PUBLIC OUTREACH PROGRAM 1 FA $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00

109.01 OWNER INITIATED TIME EXTENSION ALLOWANCE 10 DAY $500.00 $5,000.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 $500.00 $5,000.00

109.02 OWNER INITIATED TIME EXTENSION AMOUNT IN

ADDITION TO ALLOWANCE

10 DAY $60.59 $605.90 $734.00 $7,340.00 $878.40 $8,784.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 $550.00 $5,500.00

110.01 TRAINING 700 HR $0.80 $560.00 $0.80 $560.00 $0.80 $560.00 $0.80 $560.00 $0.80 $560.00

200.01 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION 1 LS $35,640.24 $35,640.24 $188,550.20 $188,550.20 $281,663.00 $281,663.00 $279,000.00 $279,000.00 $549,236.00 $549,236.00

201.01 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 1 LS $3,029.60 $3,029.60 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $3,450.00 $3,450.00 $36,900.00 $36,900.00 $6,600.00 $6,600.00

202.01 REMOVAL OF GRAVEL MULCH 7700 SY $2.91 $22,407.00 $1.85 $14,245.00 $3.11 $23,947.00 $12.60 $97,020.00 $10.70 $82,390.00

202.02 REMOVAL OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 195 SY $8.48 $1,653.60 $49.00 $9,555.00 $11.22 $2,187.90 $25.20 $4,914.00 $141.00 $27,495.00

202.03 REMOVAL OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2050 SF $3.03 $6,211.50 $3.40 $6,970.00 $2.05 $4,202.50 $3.20 $6,560.00 $3.80 $7,790.00

202.04 REMOVAL OF CONCRETE WALL 145 SF $30.30 $4,393.50 $40.00 $5,800.00 $10.05 $1,457.25 $22.00 $3,190.00 $34.00 $4,930.00

202.05 REMOVAL OF CURB & GUTTER 330 LF $6.06 $1,999.80 $16.50 $5,445.00 $8.25 $2,722.50 $14.00 $4,620.00 $13.00 $4,290.00

202.06 REMOVAL AND SALVAGE FENCE 7550 LF $3.03 $22,876.50 $9.30 $70,215.00 $4.05 $30,577.50 $6.50 $49,075.00 $7.30 $55,115.00

202.07 REMOVAL OF POST & CABLE 9250 LF $1.82 $16,835.00 $3.15 $29,137.50 $2.90 $26,825.00 $3.80 $35,150.00 $4.20 $38,850.00

202.08 REMOVAL AND SALVAGE GATE 10 EA $242.37 $2,423.70 $105.00 $1,050.00 $86.25 $862.50 $208.00 $2,080.00 $440.00 $4,400.00

202.09 REMOVAL OF CONCRETE APRON AROUND DROP

INLET

3 EA $787.70 $2,363.10 $861.00 $2,583.00 $632.50 $1,897.50 $1,470.00 $4,410.00 $1,467.00 $4,401.00

202.10 REMOVAL OF DROP INLET 1 EA $1,999.54 $1,999.54 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $1,437.50 $1,437.50 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00

202.11 REMOVAL AND SALVAGE SIGN 3 EA $48.47 $145.41 $54.00 $162.00 $138.00 $414.00 $168.00 $504.00 $73.00 $219.00

202.12 REMOVAL OF PULLBOX 1 EA $465.35 $465.35 $342.00 $342.00 $86.25 $86.25 $380.00 $380.00 $1,650.00 $1,650.00

202.13 REMOVAL AND SALVAGE TYPE III BARRICADE 3 EA $48.47 $145.41 $54.00 $162.00 $46.00 $138.00 $630.00 $1,890.00 $733.00 $2,199.00

203.01 TRAIL EXCAVATION 10000 CY $35.14 $351,400.00 $25.60 $256,000.00 $20.70 $207,000.00 $29.90 $299,000.00 $19.80 $198,000.00

211.01 GRAVEL MULCH (6-INCH DEPTH) 8900 SY $12.00 $106,800.00 $12.00 $106,800.00 $20.70 $184,230.00 $25.20 $224,280.00 $12.80 $113,920.00

211.02 PMA CHIP ROCK (2-INCH DEPTH) 8000 SY $4.99 $39,920.00 $5.50 $44,000.00 $23.30 $186,400.00 $18.90 $151,200.00 $12.10 $96,800.00

212.01 STABILIZED DG - 3/8-INCH MINUS AT 3-INCH DEPTH 44000 SF $2.00 $88,000.00 $1.70 $74,800.00 $3.25 $143,000.00 $2.80 $123,200.00 $4.40 $193,600.00

302.01 TYPE II AGGREGATE BASE 2500 CY $45.44 $113,600.00 $62.00 $155,000.00 $46.20 $115,500.00 $31.50 $78,750.00 $39.60 $99,000.00

402.01 6-INCH PLANTMIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 145 SY $322.35 $46,740.75 $161.00 $23,345.00 $199.00 $28,855.00 $325.00 $47,125.00 $303.40 $43,993.00

402.02 3-INCH PLANTMIX BITUMINOUS TRAIL SURFACE 18600 SY $17.87 $332,382.00 $15.50 $288,300.00 $18.60 $345,960.00 $22.20 $412,920.00 $16.30 $303,180.00

402.03 3-INCH PLANTMIX BITUMINOUS SHOULDER SURFACE 1400 SY $17.87 $25,018.00 $22.00 $30,800.00 $28.35 $39,690.00 $27.40 $38,360.00 $16.50 $23,100.00

413.01 3/4-INCH UTACS BONDED WITH A PMM, S3

GRADATION

145 SY $1,139.13 $165,173.85 $236.00 $34,220.00 $345.00 $50,025.00 $1,040.00 $150,800.00 $1,062.00 $153,990.00

502.01 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 90 SF $81.78 $7,360.20 $148.00 $13,320.00 $226.50 $20,385.00 $236.00 $21,240.00 $98.00 $8,820.00

502.02 CHANNEL WALL EXTENSION 108 SF $81.84 $8,838.72 $66.00 $7,128.00 $153.75 $16,605.00 $252.00 $27,216.00 $81.50 $8,802.00

502.03 LEAN CONCRETE CUT-OFF WALL 85 LF $121.18 $10,300.30 $115.00 $9,775.00 $118.65 $10,085.25 $188.00 $15,980.00 $77.60 $6,596.00

502.04 2-FOOT VALLEY GUTTER 1 EA $6,665.12 $6,665.12 $1,245.00 $1,245.00 $862.50 $862.50 $3,780.00 $3,780.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00

502.05 REMOVE AND RESET PORTABLE PRECAST BARRIER

RAIL

40 LF $63.02 $2,520.80 $44.00 $1,760.00 $86.25 $3,450.00 $126.00 $5,040.00 $110.00 $4,400.00

603.01 18-INCH REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) (CLASS

III)

265 LF $208.50 $55,252.50 $273.00 $72,345.00 $190.00 $50,350.00 $89.00 $23,585.00 $243.00 $64,395.00

603.02 24-INCH REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) (CLASS

III)

55 LF $192.78 $10,602.90 $362.00 $19,910.00 $271.00 $14,905.00 $128.00 $7,040.00 $303.00 $16,665.00

609.01 DROP INLET, TYPE 2 WITH CONCRETE APRON 4 EA $9,088.81 $36,355.24 $10,526.00 $42,104.00 $8,560.00 $34,240.00 $5,145.00 $20,580.00 $9,900.00 $39,600.00

609.02 MODIFIED DROP INLET, TYPE 2 WITH CONCRETE

APRON

2 EA $7,876.96 $15,753.92 $6,649.00 $13,298.00 $6,641.00 $13,282.00 $7,245.00 $14,490.00 $11,000.00 $22,000.00

609.03 VERTICALLY ADJUST STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

COVER

3 EA $1,333.02 $3,999.06 $1,365.00 $4,095.00 $1,026.00 $3,078.00 $660.00 $1,980.00 $733.00 $2,199.00

609.04 MODIFED CONCRETE APRON AROUND DROP INLET 2 EA $1,030.06 $2,060.12 $4,189.00 $8,378.00 $3,229.00 $6,458.00 $2,900.00 $5,800.00 $2,750.00 $5,500.00

609.05 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE, NDOT TYPE 1 2 EA $3,279.24 $6,558.48 $7,350.00 $14,700.00 $4,822.00 $9,644.00 $5,400.00 $10,800.00 $9,486.00 $18,972.00

BID ABSTRACT19.75152-JH 215 Trail Segment A - Tenaya Way to Decatur Blvd. Federal Project No. CM-0003 (253) CL-2019-438Bid Date: 9/12/19

City of Las Vegas - Finance DepartmentPuchasing & Contracts Division

495 S. Main Street, 3rd FloorLas Vegas, Nevada 89101

Las Vegas Paving Corporation CG&B Enterprises, Inc. Eagle Valley ContractorsJNJ EngineeringCMMCM LLC dba Muller Construction

City of Las Vegas Bid Abstract Page 2 of 3

Item # Description QTY UOM Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price

BID ABSTRACT19.75152-JH 215 Trail Segment A - Tenaya Way to Decatur Blvd. Federal Project No. CM-0003 (253) CL-2019-438Bid Date: 9/12/19

City of Las Vegas - Finance DepartmentPuchasing & Contracts Division

495 S. Main Street, 3rd FloorLas Vegas, Nevada 89101

Las Vegas Paving Corporation CG&B Enterprises, Inc. Eagle Valley ContractorsJNJ EngineeringCMMCM LLC dba Muller Construction

613.01 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2700 SF $7.88 $21,276.00 $9.25 $24,975.00 $8.00 $21,600.00 $9.50 $25,650.00 $10.20 $27,540.00

613.02 REINFORCED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3250 SF $10.30 $33,475.00 $11.65 $37,862.50 $9.66 $31,395.00 $12.60 $40,950.00 $10.80 $35,100.00

613.03 CONCRETE "L" TYPE CURB & GUTTER 330 LF $26.66 $8,797.80 $39.00 $12,870.00 $25.30 $8,349.00 $29.40 $9,702.00 $43.30 $14,289.00

613.04 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 700 SF $30.30 $21,210.00 $17.35 $12,145.00 $11.30 $7,910.00 $16.00 $11,200.00 $20.40 $14,280.00

616.01 72-INCH CHAIN-LINK FENCE 2960 LF $48.68 $144,092.80 $45.60 $134,976.00 $49.90 $147,704.00 $44.00 $130,240.00 $74.30 $219,928.00

616.02 72-INCH CHAIN-LINK FENCE (CHANNEL MOUNTED) 9100 LF $27.53 $250,523.00 $23.50 $213,850.00 $25.85 $235,235.00 $28.90 $262,990.00 $29.60 $269,360.00

616.03 48-INCH CHAIN-LINK FENCE (BARRIER RAIL

MOUNTED)

310 LF $44.17 $13,692.70 $24.00 $7,440.00 $34.00 $10,540.00 $32.10 $9,951.00 $39.00 $12,090.00

616.04 5-FOOT SINGLE SWING GATE (CHAIN-LINK) 20 EA $1,030.06 $20,601.20 $1,382.00 $27,640.00 $1,513.00 $30,260.00 $1,144.00 $22,880.00 $1,100.00 $22,000.00

616.05 12-FOOT DOUBLE SWING GATE (CHAIN-LINK) 10 EA $1,211.84 $12,118.40 $1,826.00 $18,260.00 $1,999.00 $19,990.00 $1,395.00 $13,950.00 $2,200.00 $22,000.00

616.06 24-FOOT DOUBLE SWING GATE (CHAIN-LINK) 4 EA $1,696.58 $6,786.32 $2,271.00 $9,084.00 $2,488.00 $9,952.00 $1,735.00 $6,940.00 $3,300.00 $13,200.00

616.07 REMOVABLE BOLLARD 3 EA $969.47 $2,908.41 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,185.00 $6,555.00 $630.00 $1,890.00 $1,100.00 $3,300.00

622.01 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING 1 LS $63,985.19 $63,985.19 $87,000.00 $87,000.00 $114,889.60 $114,889.60 $52,000.00 $52,000.00 $38,500.00 $38,500.00

623.01 REMOVE AND RELOCATE STREET LIGHT POLE 3 EA $4,644.99 $13,934.97 $2,924.00 $8,772.00 $4,408.00 $13,224.00 $3,600.00 $10,800.00 $3,667.00 $11,001.00

623.02 NO. 7 PULLBOX (ITS) 18 EA $2,060.13 $37,082.34 $1,700.00 $30,600.00 $1,955.00 $35,190.00 $1,825.00 $32,850.00 $1,650.00 $29,700.00

623.03 TYPE 200 SPLICE VAULT (ITS) 2 EA $7,392.23 $14,784.46 $6,138.00 $12,276.00 $7,015.00 $14,030.00 $8,400.00 $16,800.00 $7,150.00 $14,300.00

623.04 4-INCH PVC CONDUIT (ITS) 14250 LF $18.78 $267,615.00 $20.80 $296,400.00 $15.36 $218,880.00 $18.90 $269,325.00 $16.30 $232,275.00

623.05 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION - TENEYA

WAY/CENTENNIAL

1 LS $55,744.67 $55,744.67 $31,000.00 $31,000.00 $41,400.00 $41,400.00 $48,000.00 $48,000.00 $72,600.00 $72,600.00

623.06 NO. 3 1/2 PULLBOX (STREET LIGHT) 1 EA $1,014.31 $1,014.31 $2,289.00 $2,289.00 $963.00 $963.00 $990.00 $990.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00

624.01 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE 1 LS $43,626.27 $43,626.27 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $31,625.00 $31,625.00 $48,300.00 $48,300.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00

627.01 PERMANENT SIGN (GROUND MOUNTED) 52 EA $254.49 $13,233.48 $207.00 $10,764.00 $230.00 $11,960.00 $242.00 $12,584.00 $233.00 $12,116.00

627.02 PERMANENT SIGN (POLE OR FENCE MOUNTED) 46 EA $254.49 $11,706.54 $207.00 $9,522.00 $138.00 $6,348.00 $148.00 $6,808.00 $143.00 $6,578.00

627.03 REMOVE AND RESET SIGN (GROUND MOUNTED) 3 EA $254.49 $763.47 $207.00 $621.00 $143.75 $431.25 $160.00 $480.00 $367.00 $1,101.00

628.01 PAINT (4-INCH SOLID YELLOW) 480 LF $0.91 $436.80 $0.46 $220.80 $0.30 $144.00 $1.60 $768.00 $1.10 $528.00

628.02 PAINT (4-INCH DASHED YELLOW) 13400 LF $0.30 $4,020.00 $0.46 $6,164.00 $0.30 $4,020.00 $1.30 $17,420.00 $0.60 $8,040.00

628.03 PAINT (12-INCH SOLID WHITE) 45 LF $3.64 $163.80 $1.40 $63.00 $0.75 $33.75 $6.00 $270.00 $2.40 $108.00

628.04 PAINT (4-INCH SOLID WHITE) 6600 LF $0.91 $6,006.00 $0.46 $3,036.00 $0.25 $1,650.00 $1.30 $8,580.00 $0.70 $4,620.00

628-1.01 TRAIL ENTRANCE MARKING 10 EA $1,030.06 $10,300.60 $1,375.00 $13,750.00 $1,581.25 $15,812.50 $420.00 $4,200.00 $2,750.00 $27,500.00

629.01 VERTICALLY ADJUST AVAR 1 EA $4,544.40 $4,544.40 $1,575.00 $1,575.00 $910.00 $910.00 $3,570.00 $3,570.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00

629.02 VERTICALLY ADJUST TEST STATION 4 EA $2,544.87 $10,179.48 $630.00 $2,520.00 $661.00 $2,644.00 $630.00 $2,520.00 $550.00 $2,200.00

629.03 VERTICALLY ADJUST BLOWOFF COVER 1 EA $1,514.80 $1,514.80 $1,260.00 $1,260.00 $910.00 $910.00 $990.00 $990.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00

629.04 VERTICALLY ADJUST VALVE BOX COVER 1 EA $908.88 $908.88 $840.00 $840.00 $910.00 $910.00 $790.00 $790.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00

637.01 DUST CONTROL 1 LS $7,271.04 $7,271.04 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $52,026.00 $52,026.00 $39,800.00 $39,800.00 $41,676.00 $41,676.00

637.02 NPDES DISCHARGE PERMIT 1 LS $12,118.41 $12,118.41 $35,500.00 $35,500.00 $25,875.00 $25,875.00 $9,900.00 $9,900.00 $17,053.00 $17,053.00

672.01 2-INCH TRAIL LIGHT PVC CONDUIT W/ 1-#8 15100 LF $9.85 $148,735.00 $14.85 $224,235.00 $14.70 $221,970.00 $12.92 $195,092.00 $10.60 $160,060.00

672.02 NO. 3 1/2 PULLBOX (TRAIL LIGHTING) 10 EA $1,014.31 $10,143.10 $1,435.00 $14,350.00 $1,572.00 $15,720.00 $980.00 $9,800.00 $880.00 $8,800.00

672.01A TRAIL LIGHT ASSEMBLY (LED) 160 EA $3,722.31 $595,569.60 $4,952.00 $792,320.00 $3,819.20 $611,072.00 $5,140.00 $822,400.00 $6,393.80 $1,023,008.00

672.02A TRAIL LIGHT CONDUCTORS [(2-#2 AND 1-#4) OR (2-#1

AND 1-#4)]14,250

LF $5.50 $78,375.00 $7.56 $107,730.00 $6.20 $88,350.00 $7.20 $102,600.00 $8.50 $121,125.00

672.03A MODIFY SERVICE PEDESTAL 3 EA $1,025.92 $3,077.76 $1,558.00 $4,674.00 $1,057.30 $3,171.90 $1,576.00 $4,728.00 $1,833.00 $5,499.00

672.04A 200 AMP SERVICE PEDESTAL 1 EA $4,732.00 $4,732.00 $7,513.00 $7,513.00 $5,300.00 $5,300.00 $7,098.00 $7,098.00 $7,700.00 $7,700.00

Additive Alternate 1: Trail lighting - addition of trail lighting poles, conductors, and service pedestals.

TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT $2,854,371.75 $2,999,000.00 $3,256,273.25 $3,565,499.00 $3,647,000.00

City of Las Vegas Bid Abstract Page 3 of 3

Item # Description QTY UOM Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price

BID ABSTRACT19.75152-JH 215 Trail Segment A - Tenaya Way to Decatur Blvd. Federal Project No. CM-0003 (253) CL-2019-438Bid Date: 9/12/19

City of Las Vegas - Finance DepartmentPuchasing & Contracts Division

495 S. Main Street, 3rd FloorLas Vegas, Nevada 89101

Las Vegas Paving Corporation CG&B Enterprises, Inc. Eagle Valley ContractorsJNJ EngineeringCMMCM LLC dba Muller Construction

672.05A 2-INCH TRAIL LIGHT PVC CONDUIT - DIRECTIONAL

DRILL370

LF $102.75 $38,017.50 $108.00 $39,960.00 $112.00 $41,440.00 $110.00 $40,700.00 $104.00 $38,480.00

672.06A 3-INCH PVC CONDUIT (NVE) 20 LF $40.09 $801.80 $24.00 $480.00 $44.80 $896.00 $72.00 $1,440.00 $83.00 $1,660.00

$4,844,472.00TOTAL BASE BID + ADDITIVE ALTERNATE AMOUNT $3,574,945.41 $3,951,677.00 $4,006,503.15 $4,544,465.00

TOTAL ADDITIVE ALTERNATE AMOUNT $720,573.66 $952,677.00 $750,229.90 $978,966.00 $1,197,472.00

Award to Low Bidder Recommended

Department Evaluation Complete

NoNo

Yes Yes

Responsible Bidder

Responsive Bidder

Bidder's Preference Received

% Greater than Lowest Responsive & Responsible Bidder

No

Yes

No

Yes

5.07%

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 002AB-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 002AB-FTI; EASTERN AVENUE, WARM SPRINGS ROAD TO DESERT INN ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance002AB-FTI $ 4,550,753.93 Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 915 $ 629,246.07

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to Clark County available resources.

6878

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Eastern Ave., Warm Springs Rd. to Desert Inn Rd.Clark County

915

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

002AB-FTI

Final Report

PUBLIC WORKS, CLARK COUNTY

5/23/2017 3117104331 0.00 12,766.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,766.710.00

6/21/2017 1017025933 673,810.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 673,810.000.00

6/21/2017 3117112583(FTI-1) 0.00 11,807.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,807.760.00

6/27/2017 3117118062 0.00 8,881.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,881.680.00

8/22/2017 3118005479(A) 0.00 7,024.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,024.580.00

11/28/2018 1019028247 276,412.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 276,412.600.00

5/30/2019 3119112952 125,526.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 125,526.680.00

5/30/2019 3119111529 89,741.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89,741.080.00

6/12/2019 1019066466 0.00 27,047.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,047.110.00

7/10/2019 3119128042 140,541.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,541.650.00

7/10/2019 3119125776 46,949.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,949.220.00

7/17/2019 3019256701 84,956.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,956.300.00

7/31/2019 3119136089 18,983.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,983.040.00

7/31/2019 3119136771 0.00 14,489.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,489.240.00

8/21/2019 3120003885 356,791.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 356,791.930.00

8/29/2019 3120008145 627,829.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 627,829.900.00

9/5/2019 3120009699 47,930.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,930.920.00

10/10/2019 3120020201 730,440.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 730,440.600.00

10/10/2019 3120020522 538,206.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 538,206.450.00

10/10/2019 3120022407 0.00 16,086.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,086.630.00

11/20/2019 3120037186B 0.00 10,634.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,634.350.00

12/26/2019 1020030520 0.00 2,353.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,353.040.00

12/26/2019 3120049083 16,753.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,753.770.00

1/8/2020 1020030518 186,101.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 186,101.990.00

1/8/2020 1020030519 106,410.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106,410.190.00

1/8/2020 3120051313 175,009.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,009.410.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 1 of 2

Eastern Ave., Warm Springs Rd. to Desert Inn Rd.Clark County

915

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

002AB-FTI

Final Report

1/22/2020 3120057637 0.00 37,924.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,924.110.00

1/22/2020 3120058279 129,655.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129,655.500.00

2/5/2020 3120062081 865.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 865.390.00

2/5/2020 3120065635 13,813.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,813.600.00

2/19/2020 1020044310 11,929.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,929.430.00

2/19/2020 1020044308 0.00 1,613.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,613.590.00

2/19/2020 1020044309 1,465.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,465.480.00

TTL 4,400,125.13 150,628.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,550,753.930.00

4,400,125.13 150,628.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,550,753.93Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

4,200,000.00 979,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.000.00 5,180,000.00

-200,125.13 828,371.20 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 629,246.070.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 2 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5557F20D-6BAA-4BCA-8630-453601F86957

Respectfully submitted, JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 003X-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT 003X-FTI; MARYLAND PARKWAY, STEWART AVENUE TO RUSSELL ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance003X-FTI 3,115,004.83$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 1046 10,031.32$

BACKGROUND: When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada available resources.

6899

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Maryland Pkwy: Stewart Ave/Russell RdRegional Transportation Commission

1046

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

003X-FTI

Final Report

JACOBS ENGINEERING

1/5/2015 PMC-01CP 0.00 5,954.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,954.400.00

2/2/2015 PMC-02CP 0.00 2,580.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,580.240.00

2/24/2015 PMC-03CP 0.00 1,903.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,903.430.00

7/22/2015 PMC-07CP 0.00 25,802.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,802.400.00

11/25/2015 PMC-01CPD 0.00 4,962.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,962.880.00

1/6/2016 PMC-03CPD-16 0.00 1,336.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,336.160.00

2/24/2016 PMC-04CPD-16 0.00 5,535.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,535.520.00

3/23/2016 PMC-05CPD-16 0.00 381.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 381.760.00

4/27/2016 PMC-06CPD-16 0.00 2,290.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,290.560.00

5/18/2016 PMC-07CPD-16 0.00 1,717.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,717.920.00

6/8/2016 PMC-08CPD-16 0.00 3,054.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,054.080.00

8/3/2016 PMC-10CPD-16 0.00 381.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 381.760.00

8/3/2016 PMC-09CPD-16 0.00 1,527.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,527.040.00

TTL 0.00 57,428.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,428.150.00

PARSONS TRANSPORTATION

7/20/2015 1507B346 0.00 50,353.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,353.500.00

8/24/2015 1508A194 0.00 110,460.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,460.780.00

9/21/2015 1509B338 0.00 196,198.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 196,198.580.00

10/26/2015 1510A196 0.00 150,300.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,300.820.00

11/23/2015 1511A263 0.00 308,256.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 308,256.440.00

2/1/2016 1601B484 0.00 96,994.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 96,994.110.00

2/29/2016 1512A774 0.00 127,172.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 127,172.590.00

3/31/2016 1602A190 0.00 86,377.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 86,377.420.00

3/31/2016 1603A885 0.00 92,674.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 92,674.510.00

4/30/2016 1605A319 0.00 87,665.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 87,665.700.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Maryland Pkwy: Stewart Ave/Russell RdRegional Transportation Commission

1046

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

003X-FTI

Final Report

4/30/2016 1604A639 0.00 100,940.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,940.360.00

6/30/2016 1606A760 0.00 113,627.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 113,627.110.00

8/11/2016 1607A744 0.00 80,791.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,791.990.00

10/19/2016 1608B547 0.00 74,734.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74,734.000.00

10/26/2016 1609B081 0.00 73,767.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73,767.000.00

11/9/2016 1610A865 0.00 71,658.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 71,658.200.00

5/31/2017 1704A505 0.00 101,474.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 101,474.980.00

5/31/2017 1611A779 0.00 47,989.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,989.270.00

5/31/2017 1612A733 0.00 51,247.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,247.850.00

5/31/2017 1701A490 0.00 79,400.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,400.800.00

5/31/2017 1702B518 0.00 45,234.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45,234.000.00

5/31/2017 1703C378 0.00 75,799.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 75,799.780.00

6/30/2017 1705A535 0.00 36,372.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,372.700.00

6/30/2017 1706B146 0.00 17,798.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,798.580.00

6/30/2017 1707A573 0.00 55,576.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,576.710.00

10/11/2017 1708A450 0.00 27,111.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,111.290.00

10/11/2017 1709A507 0.00 13,372.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,372.290.00

11/29/2017 1710A592 0.00 34,495.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,495.970.00

12/6/2017 1711A639 0.00 31,773.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,773.560.00

1/10/2018 1712A893 0.00 38,073.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,073.990.00

1/24/2018 1801A772 0.00 30,120.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,120.030.00

3/28/2018 1802A566 0.00 33,869.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,869.540.00

5/9/2018 1803A516 0.00 90,703.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 90,703.530.00

5/16/2018 1804A849 0.00 62,265.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 62,265.300.00

6/6/2018 1805C141 0.00 32,799.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,799.590.00

6/27/2018 1806A412 0.00 36,695.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,695.920.00

7/25/2018 1807A387 0.00 55,791.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,791.240.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Maryland Pkwy: Stewart Ave/Russell RdRegional Transportation Commission

1046

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

003X-FTI

Final Report

8/31/2018 1809B346 0.00 15,825.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,825.870.00

9/30/2018 1808A355 0.00 18,713.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,713.660.00

9/30/2018 1810A381 0.00 9,221.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,221.950.00

9/30/2018 1811A757 0.00 10,815.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,815.630.00

1/24/2019 1901A376 0.00 13,737.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,737.420.00

2/13/2019 1902A693 0.00 15,108.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,108.200.00

2/28/2019 1903A272 0.00 22,818.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,818.540.00

4/17/2019 1904A315 0.00 42,554.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,554.630.00

5/30/2019 1905B207 0.00 31,220.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,220.050.00

6/26/2019 1906A319 0.00 28,276.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,276.520.00

7/24/2019 1907A880 0.00 12,827.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,827.250.00

9/5/2019 1908A359 0.00 8,233.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,233.380.00

10/6/2019 1909A698 0.00 3,717.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,717.000.00

11/27/2019 1911A441 0.00 358.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 358.150.00

12/16/2019 1912A339 0.00 2,593.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,593.500.00

1/27/2020 2001A267 0.00 1,296.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,296.750.00

3/4/2020 2002A486 0.00 318.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 318.150.00

TTL 0.00 3,057,576.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,057,576.680.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Maryland Pkwy: Stewart Ave/Russell RdRegional Transportation Commission

1046

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

003X-FTI

Final Report

0.00 3,115,004.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,115,004.83Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 3,125,036.15 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 3,125,036.15

0.00 10,031.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,031.320.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 003Y-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 003Y-FTI; MARYLAND PARKWAY, RUSSELL ROAD TO TWAIN AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance003Y-FTI $ 7,570,016.41 Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 881 $ 843,983.59

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to Clark County available resources.

6879

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Maryland Pkwy: Russell Rd/Twain AveClark County

881

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

003Y-FTI

Final Report

PUBLIC WORKS, CLARK COUNTY

9/13/2016 3117016956 0.00 3,714.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,714.250.00

10/18/2016 3117025392 0.00 3,691.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,691.420.00

12/20/2016 3117049606 0.00 7,898.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,898.370.00

3/28/2017 3117084962 0.00 5,403.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,403.330.00

3/28/2017 3117085011 0.00 7,093.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,093.970.00

4/25/2017 3117092843 0.00 2,756.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,756.480.00

5/2/2017 3117098233 0.00 2,614.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,614.200.00

5/23/2017 3117104332 0.00 6,798.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,798.970.00

6/20/2017 3117112583(FTI-A) 0.00 11,304.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,304.730.00

6/27/2017 3117118062B 0.00 8,325.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,325.190.00

8/22/2017 3118005479(B) 0.00 18,563.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,563.290.00

9/19/2017 3118017862 0.00 1,248.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,248.900.00

9/19/2017 3118015929 0.00 2,707.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,707.820.00

9/19/2017 3118017820 0.00 15,648.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,648.070.00

9/19/2017 3118017856 0.00 9,822.42 0.00 0.00 4,592.47 14,414.890.00

10/3/2017 3118021193 0.00 14,254.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,254.000.00

10/18/2017 3118026618 0.00 4,396.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,396.790.00

11/21/2017 3118036536 2,255.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,255.000.00

11/21/2017 3118037448 330,065.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 330,065.880.00

12/19/2017 3118046765 0.00 1,042.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,042.490.00

12/19/2017 3118049870 2,203.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,203.820.00

12/19/2017 3118049878 3,904.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,904.000.00

1/23/2018 3118059703 15,908.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,908.850.00

2/28/2018 3118069961 7,315.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,315.000.00

3/7/2018 1018049831 0.00 80,660.92 1,364.32 0.00 0.00 82,025.240.00

3/21/2018 1018053445 0.00 10,489.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,489.560.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 1 of 3

Maryland Pkwy: Russell Rd/Twain AveClark County

881

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

003Y-FTI

Final Report

4/11/2018 1018058625 10,623.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,623.420.00

4/11/2018 3118091329 0.00 12,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,500.000.00

4/25/2018 3118094366 3,409.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,409.250.00

6/6/2018 1018069779 4,696.50 157,898.07 0.00 0.00 2,937.39 165,531.960.00

6/27/2018 3118120589 0.00 124.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 124.310.00

12/19/2018 1019030817 30,697.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,697.460.00

12/19/2018 1019030804 17,678.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,678.640.00

1/24/2019 3119059121 0.00 475.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 475.130.00

5/8/2019 3119098829 0.00 50.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.960.00

5/22/2019 3119111213 3,460.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,460.000.00

5/30/2019 3119111534 138,046.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 138,046.920.00

6/12/2019 3119117557 180,069.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180,069.760.00

7/10/2019 3119124616 9,744.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,744.000.00

7/10/2019 3119124728 715,112.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 715,112.310.00

7/10/2019 3119125780 270,349.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270,349.030.00

7/17/2019 1019072974 135,648.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 135,648.180.00

7/17/2019 1019072975 77,121.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77,121.220.00

7/17/2019 1019072976 61,494.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,494.280.00

7/31/2019 3119136656 675,086.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 675,086.900.00

7/31/2019 3119136115 35,872.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,872.960.00

8/21/2019 3120003131 5,735.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,735.000.00

9/5/2019 3120009726 103,325.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 103,325.280.00

9/5/2019 3120009811 984,072.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 984,072.780.00

9/18/2019 3120014935 7,521.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,521.500.00

10/10/2019 3120020322 1,941,741.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,941,741.870.00

10/10/2019 3120020526 434,866.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 434,866.430.00

10/10/2019 3120023301 10,136.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,136.000.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 2 of 3

Maryland Pkwy: Russell Rd/Twain AveClark County

881

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

003Y-FTI

Final Report

11/20/2019 3120034698 114,192.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 114,192.660.00

11/27/2019 3120043332 12,527.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,527.750.00

12/11/2019 3120045540 770.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 770.000.00

1/8/2020 1020030514 305,875.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 305,875.690.00

1/8/2020 3120051324 138,855.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 138,855.380.00

2/5/2020 3120062088 56,600.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56,600.580.00

2/5/2020 3120064391 280.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 280.000.00

2/5/2020 3120065653 310,639.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 310,639.700.00

2/19/2020 1020044316 0.00 13,734.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,734.590.00

TTL 7,157,904.00 403,218.23 1,364.32 0.00 7,529.86 7,570,016.410.00

7,157,904.00 403,218.23 1,364.32 0.00 7,529.86 7,570,016.41Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

8,009,000.00 398,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.000.00 8,414,000.00

851,096.00 -5,218.23 -1,364.32 0.00 -529.86 843,983.590.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5557F20D-6BAA-4BCA-8630-453601F86957

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 006J-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 006J-FTI; TROPICANA AVENUE, HUALAPAI WAY TO FORT APACHE ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance006J-FTI $ 8,788,350.31 Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 782 $ 3,945,649.69

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to Clark County available resources.

6880

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Tropicana Ave: Hualapai Wy/Ft. Apache RdClark County

782

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

006J-FTI

Final Report

PUBLIC WORKS, CLARK COUNTY

9/17/2014 3115013494 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,530.00 4,530.000.00

9/17/2014 3115013101 0.00 1,454.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,454.590.00

10/20/2014 3115025094 0.00 4,105.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,105.500.00

11/10/2014 3115034448 0.00 3,386.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,386.400.00

5/5/2015 3115091292 0.00 918.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 918.000.00

8/13/2015 3116006042 0.00 5,644.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,644.000.00

9/14/2015 3116015309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 7,500.000.00

9/28/2015 3116014407 0.00 1,749.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,749.300.00

11/17/2015 3116033657 0.00 2,633.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,633.300.00

1/12/2016 3116054226 0.00 1,564.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,564.000.00

3/15/2016 3116075700 0.00 4,772.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,772.600.00

6/14/2016 3116112512 0.00 2,920.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,920.600.00

6/19/2016 5217 0.00 -6.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 -6.110.00

8/16/2016 3117003650 0.00 10,861.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,861.600.00

9/13/2016 3117013586 0.00 1,043.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,043.800.00

10/11/2016 3117025485 0.00 1,159.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,159.400.00

2/21/2017 3017147708 0.00 6.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.110.00

3/21/2017 3117081711 0.00 6,664.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,664.000.00

4/12/2017 3117089760 0.00 27,900.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,900.400.00

5/30/2017 3117104688 0.00 12,594.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,594.120.00

6/13/2017 3117112542 0.00 2,451.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,451.400.00

7/10/2017 3117123105 0.00 1,128.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,128.800.00

11/14/2017 3118035064 0.00 2,040.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,040.000.00

2/28/2018 3118071549 0.00 5,662.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,662.700.00

2/28/2018 3118071559 0.00 12,049.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,049.600.00

4/11/2018 3118091561 0.00 3,711.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,711.250.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 4

Tropicana Ave: Hualapai Wy/Ft. Apache RdClark County

782

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

006J-FTI

Final Report

4/11/2018 3118091561 0.00 3,711.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,711.250.00

5/30/2018 3118110071 0.00 11,163.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,163.550.00

6/6/2018 1018069774 104.14 26,889.92 0.00 0.00 184,165.74 211,159.800.00

9/5/2018 3119009402 0.00 2,084.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,084.200.00

12/12/2018 3119040571 9,778.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,778.000.00

1/3/2019 3119052247 0.00 6,773.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,773.040.00

1/9/2019 3119056837 126,106.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126,106.250.00

1/16/2019 3119052245 62,430.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62,430.500.00

1/24/2019 3119061387 94,044.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94,044.250.00

1/24/2019 3119052247A 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.900.00

1/24/2019 3119059136 0.00 675.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 675.500.00

1/24/2019 3119061060 4,238.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,238.450.00

1/30/2019 3119061724 892,559.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 892,559.190.00

2/21/2019 3119072769 105,223.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105,223.000.00

2/27/2019 3119072825 3,886.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,886.720.00

2/27/2019 3119074562 724,914.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 724,914.680.00

3/20/2019 3119084106 2,591.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,591.150.00

3/20/2019 3119084107 900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.000.00

3/27/2019 3119087365 0.00 3,383.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,383.000.00

3/27/2019 3119087377 0.00 4,484.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,484.600.00

3/27/2019 3119087358 0.00 2,196.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,196.400.00

3/27/2019 3119085646 95,469.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95,469.000.00

4/3/2019 3119089356 947,147.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 947,147.400.00

4/24/2019 3119097176 154,527.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 154,527.750.00

4/24/2019 3119097384 9,069.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,069.030.00

5/8/2019 3119101520 1,545,027.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,545,027.220.00

5/22/2019 3119008945 0.00 4,008.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,008.600.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 2 of 4

Tropicana Ave: Hualapai Wy/Ft. Apache RdClark County

782

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

006J-FTI

Final Report

5/22/2019 3119105938 0.00 3,383.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,383.000.00

5/22/2019 3119108112 342,607.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 342,607.890.00

5/22/2019 3119111230 119,401.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 119,401.250.00

5/30/2019 3119112452 8,421.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,421.240.00

6/19/2019 3119120638 434,981.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 434,981.080.00

6/19/2019 3119120678 2,591.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,591.150.00

6/26/2019 3119122884 140,869.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,869.500.00

7/17/2019 1019072973 88,166.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88,166.370.00

7/24/2019 3119134956 845,371.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 845,371.100.00

7/31/2019 3119134904 106,907.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106,907.000.00

7/31/2019 3119135875 7,773.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,773.450.00

8/29/2019 3120004465 84,843.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,843.000.00

9/5/2019 3120007089 1,002,874.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,002,874.390.00

9/18/2019 3120016280 6,477.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,477.870.00

10/10/2019 3120020096 9,717.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,717.000.00

10/10/2019 3120017311 68,585.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,585.250.00

10/10/2019 3120018511 115,288.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 115,288.000.00

10/30/2019 3120029026 10,910.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,910.000.00

11/6/2019 3120033104 3,238.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,238.750.00

11/13/2019 3120029735 173,093.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 173,093.750.00

11/27/2019 3120043161 0.00 1,666.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,666.000.00

1/22/2020 3120057542 0.00 1,717.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,717.000.00

2/19/2020 1020044313 17,497.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,497.310.00

2/19/2020 1020044311 24,554.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,554.540.00

TTL 8,392,187.52 199,967.05 0.00 0.00 196,195.74 8,788,350.310.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 3 of 4

Tropicana Ave: Hualapai Wy/Ft. Apache RdClark County

782

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

006J-FTI

Final Report

8,392,187.52 199,967.05 0.00 0.00 196,195.74 8,788,350.31Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

11,634,000.00 1,050,000.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.000.00 12,734,000.00

3,241,812.48 850,032.95 0.00 0.00 -146,195.74 3,945,649.690.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5557F20D-6BAA-4BCA-8630-453601F86957

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 009M-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 009M-FTI; CHARLESTON BOULEVARD, RANCHO DRIVE TO MARTIN L. KING BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance009M-FTI 965,979.05$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 887 534,020.95$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Las Vegas available resources.

6883

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Charleston Blvd:Rancho Dr/Martin L. King BlvdCity of Las Vegas

887

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

009M-FTI

Final Report

LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

8/30/2016 220786 0.00 20,505.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,505.200.00

10/18/2016 221897 0.00 8,298.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,298.820.00

10/18/2016 222657 0.00 931.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 931.720.00

11/15/2016 223510 0.00 25,616.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,616.900.00

12/13/2016 224843 0.00 16,543.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,543.970.00

1/3/2017 225316 0.00 17,099.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,099.590.00

2/7/2017 225817 0.00 634.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 634.660.00

3/14/2017 226780 0.00 28,175.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,175.610.00

3/28/2017 227215 0.00 2,849.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,849.210.00

4/25/2017 227869 0.00 25,826.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,826.420.00

6/20/2017 229437 0.00 22,295.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,295.360.00

6/27/2017 228337 0.00 4,826.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,826.280.00

8/8/2017 233857 0.00 36,050.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,050.560.00

8/29/2017 235797 0.00 22,340.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,340.000.00

8/29/2017 236777 0.00 2,383.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,383.120.00

10/18/2017 130141631 0.00 -8,298.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 -8,298.820.00

10/18/2017 240857 0.00 1,442.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,442.820.00

12/5/2017 244257 0.00 1,332.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,332.240.00

12/12/2017 244937 0.00 66,168.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 66,168.320.00

1/9/2018 247857 0.00 137,165.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 137,165.880.00

1/23/2018 232177 0.00 1,061.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,061.800.00

1/30/2018 250943 0.00 4,893.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,893.500.00

3/7/2018 252069 0.00 1,918.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,918.060.00

3/21/2018 252917 0.00 16,753.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,753.810.00

4/25/2018 256237 0.00 3,729.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,729.380.00

5/30/2018 257720 0.00 10,241.62 0.00 0.00 1,332.16 11,573.780.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 1 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Charleston Blvd:Rancho Dr/Martin L. King BlvdCity of Las Vegas

887

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

009M-FTI

Final Report

7/3/2018 258381 0.00 29,595.32 0.00 0.00 951.50 30,546.820.00

8/1/2018 261637 0.00 34,991.88 0.00 0.00 5,272.44 40,264.320.00

9/5/2018 264857 0.00 6,091.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,091.570.00

10/3/2018 269277 0.00 8,763.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,763.730.00

10/31/2018 266097 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.000.00

11/14/2018 271743 0.00 11,150.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,150.870.00

12/19/2018 272633 0.00 32,143.05 0.00 0.00 3,977.93 36,120.980.00

1/24/2019 274231 0.00 7,007.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,007.470.00

1/30/2019 275592 0.00 79,082.19 0.00 0.00 3,091.40 82,173.590.00

2/27/2019 276698 0.00 14,817.05 0.00 4,115.29 0.00 18,932.340.00

3/27/2019 278040 0.00 18,576.36 0.00 0.00 5,589.40 24,165.760.00

4/24/2019 279399 0.00 32,485.29 0.00 0.00 4,391.12 36,876.410.00

5/30/2019 281337 0.00 14,290.85 0.00 0.00 3,824.69 18,115.540.00

6/26/2019 283538 0.00 35,132.80 0.00 0.00 3,366.05 38,498.850.00

7/31/2019 286377 0.00 12,110.31 0.00 0.00 5,835.61 17,945.920.00

8/29/2019 290077 0.00 50,414.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,414.250.00

8/29/2019 291057 0.00 3,436.16 0.00 0.00 3,190.91 6,627.070.00

9/3/2019 130141631 0.00 8,298.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,298.820.00

9/25/2019 294437 0.00 4,016.98 0.00 0.00 3,883.41 7,900.390.00

10/30/2019 297217 0.00 10,947.38 0.00 0.00 4,008.78 14,956.160.00

2/5/2020 306337 0.00 22,010.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,010.000.00

TTL 0.00 913,148.36 0.00 4,115.29 48,715.40 965,979.050.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Charleston Blvd:Rancho Dr/Martin L. King BlvdCity of Las Vegas

887

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

009M-FTI

Final Report

0.00 913,148.36 0.00 4,115.29 48,715.40 965,979.05Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 1,490,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.000.00 1,500,000.00

0.00 576,851.64 0.00 -4,115.29 -38,715.40 534,020.950.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 010M-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 010M-FTI; RAINBOW BOULEVARD, ERIE AVENUE TO BLUE DIAMOND ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance010M-FTI 5,250,589.47$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 796 1,649,410.53$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to Clark County available resources.

6881

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Rainbow Blvd: Erie Ave/Blue Diamond RdClark County

796

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

010M-FTI

Final Report

PUBLIC WORKS, CLARK COUNTY

10/20/2014 3115026292B 0.00 54,065.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 54,065.360.00

12/2/2014 3115039548 0.00 13,337.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,337.540.00

12/29/2014 3015086030 0.00 300.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.800.00

1/20/2015 3115052899 0.00 7,574.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,574.410.00

2/3/2015 3115059657 0.00 10,502.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,502.270.00

3/2/2015 3115067391 282,350.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 282,350.910.00

3/16/2015 3015132004 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3115073948 0.00 11,989.81 0.00 0.00 3,358.53 15,348.340.00

3/16/2015 3015132027 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132026 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132025 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132024 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

3/16/2015 3015132021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00

4/13/2015 3115083245 0.00 29,372.21 0.00 0.00 1,347.65 30,719.860.00

5/19/2015 3115097768 0.00 852.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 852.840.00

6/9/2015 3115105874 0.00 855.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 855.770.00

7/7/2015 3115113100 0.00 19,930.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,930.500.00

7/7/2015 3115113104 0.00 19,443.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,443.370.00

7/7/2015 3115113101 0.00 6,284.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,284.220.00

7/16/2015 3115120925 0.00 1,861.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,861.530.00

10/13/2015 3116025912 0.00 855.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 855.770.00

11/24/2015 3116035420 0.00 10,626.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,626.700.00

Wednesday, February 19, 2020 Page 1 of 4

Rainbow Blvd: Erie Ave/Blue Diamond RdClark County

796

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

010M-FTI

Final Report

10/13/2015 3116025912 0.00 855.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 855.770.00

11/24/2015 3116035420 0.00 10,626.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,626.700.00

11/24/2015 3116035430 0.00 21,205.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,205.740.00

1/12/2016 3116054202 0.00 6,185.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,185.530.00

1/12/2016 3116054178 0.00 10,998.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,998.840.00

2/16/2016 3116064815 0.00 309.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 309.890.00

3/15/2016 3116075879 0.00 10,651.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,651.660.00

3/15/2016 3116074504 0.00 368.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 368.630.00

4/26/2016 3116093016 0.00 13,696.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,696.260.00

5/17/2016 3116099272 0.00 292.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 292.500.00

5/17/2016 3116099277 0.00 14,459.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,459.450.00

6/7/2016 3116106350 0.00 20,912.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,912.210.00

6/28/2016 3116119893 0.00 350.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.630.00

8/16/2016 3117003704 0.00 9,839.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,839.930.00

9/13/2016 3117013564 0.00 3,639.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,639.560.00

10/11/2016 3117025241 0.00 1,350.27 0.00 0.00 2,380.51 3,730.780.00

10/18/2016 3117029407 105,532.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105,532.090.00

10/25/2016 1017002479 0.00 405.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 405.020.00

11/22/2016 3117039898 0.00 5,814.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,814.690.00

11/22/2016 3117040342 325,361.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,361.800.00

1/3/2017 3117052829 0.00 7,904.51 0.00 0.00 2,758.95 10,663.460.00

1/10/2017 3117052082 107,277.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107,277.660.00

1/10/2017 3117052750 0.00 8,255.91 0.00 0.00 2,890.95 11,146.860.00

1/24/2017 1017005801 0.00 18,675.29 0.00 0.00 2,683.36 21,358.650.00

1/24/2017 3117060879 411,369.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 411,369.610.00

2/7/2017 3117063254 0.00 7,907.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,907.630.00

3/7/2017 3117070320 375,358.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 375,358.570.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Rainbow Blvd: Erie Ave/Blue Diamond RdClark County

796

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

010M-FTI

Final Report

3/21/2017 3117081707 0.00 8,726.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,726.730.00

3/21/2017 3117081036 602,428.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 602,428.720.00

4/18/2017 3117092664 746,892.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 746,892.380.00

5/16/2017 3117102104 259,934.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 259,934.130.00

5/30/2017 3117104763 0.00 1,114.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,114.940.00

6/27/2017 3117121190 19,235.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,235.490.00

11/21/2017 3118041186 37,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,000.000.00

12/13/2017 1017005801 0.00 -18,675.29 0.00 0.00 -2,683.36 -21,358.650.00

2/6/2018 1018044971 0.00 312,220.39 6,079.60 0.00 0.00 318,299.990.00

2/6/2018 1018044911 0.00 132,169.20 85,710.39 0.00 11,928.11 229,807.700.00

3/21/2018 3118081997 1,266.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,266.520.00

6/6/2018 3118105648 0.00 7,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,400.000.00

12/12/2018 1019030792 0.00 131,958.90 0.00 0.00 9,374.91 141,333.810.00

4/24/2019 3119093158 20,201.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,201.000.00

5/8/2019 3119101553 51,065.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,065.000.00

5/8/2019 3119103136 0.00 185.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.600.00

5/22/2019 3119111166 170,937.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170,937.850.00

6/19/2019 3019236255 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 350.000.00

6/19/2019 3019236248 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 350.000.00

6/19/2019 3019236251 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 350.000.00

6/26/2019 3019248817 10,218.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,218.410.00

6/26/2019 3119122891 448,196.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448,196.450.00

7/10/2019 3019253785 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 350.000.00

7/10/2019 3019253789 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 350.000.00

7/10/2019 3019253793 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 350.000.00

7/17/2019 1019072972 0.00 80,785.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,785.250.00

7/17/2019 3119133088 111,779.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111,779.900.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Rainbow Blvd: Erie Ave/Blue Diamond RdClark County

796

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

010M-FTI

Final Report

8/21/2019 3120006761 8,932.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,932.000.00

9/18/2019 3020047460 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 266.00 266.000.00

12/17/2019 3020034261 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,900.00 1,900.000.00

2/5/2020 3120064006 15,692.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,692.410.00

TTL 4,111,030.90 1,006,962.97 91,789.99 0.00 40,805.61 5,250,589.470.00

4,111,030.90 1,006,962.97 91,789.99 0.00 40,805.61 5,250,589.47Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

6,000,000.00 850,000.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.000.00 6,900,000.00

1,888,969.10 -156,962.97 -91,789.99 0.00 9,194.39 1,649,410.530.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 051Q-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 051Q-FTI; LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN COMSTOCK DRIVE AND STELLA LAKE STREET AND HUALAPAI WAY AT CRESTDALE LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance051Q-FTI 1,264,402.54$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 985 735,597.46$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Las Vegas available resources.

6884

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Lake Mead Blvd between Comstock Dr and Stella Lake St and Hulapai Wy at Crestdale LnCity of Las Vegas

985

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

051Q-FTI

Final Report

LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

9/5/2018 267137 24,910.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,910.880.00

12/19/2018 273197 285,012.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 285,012.260.00

1/16/2019 274525 169,238.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169,238.030.00

2/21/2019 276334 227,714.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 227,714.230.00

4/17/2019 278825 140,222.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,222.720.00

7/31/2019 287557 235,123.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 235,123.450.00

10/10/2019 295057 295.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.730.00

1/29/2020 304337 181,885.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 181,885.240.00

TTL 1,264,402.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,264,402.540.00

1,264,402.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,264,402.54Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 2,000,000.00

735,597.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 735,597.460.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 076V-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CLARK COUNTY PROJECT 076V-FTI; CLARK COUNTY 215, DECATUR BOULEVARD TO NORTH 5TH STREET (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance076V-FTI 41,163,516.23$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 739 1,986,483.77$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to Clark County available resources.

6882

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

CC-215: Decatur Blvd to N. 5th StClark County

739

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

076V-FTI

Final Report

PUBLIC WORKS, CLARK COUNTY

6/16/2014 3114109359 966,516.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 966,516.000.00

10/6/2014 3115020232 0.00 0.00 8,694.40 0.00 0.00 8,694.400.00

10/28/2014 3115031555 0.00 0.00 17,388.80 0.00 0.00 17,388.800.00

12/2/2014 3115039542 0.00 0.00 8,694.40 0.00 0.00 8,694.400.00

12/22/2014 3115046616 0.00 0.00 13,041.60 0.00 0.00 13,041.600.00

12/29/2014 3115048427 0.00 41,842.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,842.580.00

12/29/2014 3115048455 0.00 102,167.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102,167.000.00

12/29/2014 3115049129 101,075.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101,075.560.00

1/20/2015 3115053441 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.000.00

1/27/2015 3115057393 1,101,298.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,101,298.620.00

1/27/2015 3115057564 0.00 0.00 30,430.40 0.00 0.00 30,430.400.00

1/27/2015 3115057389 0.00 98,521.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,521.000.00

3/2/2015 3115068436 0.00 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

3/2/2015 3115067212 2,060,303.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,060,303.620.00

3/10/2015 3115069472 0.00 131,686.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 131,686.380.00

3/24/2015 3115078120 0.00 0.00 34,777.60 0.00 0.00 34,777.600.00

3/24/2015 3115078791 0.00 165,779.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 165,779.790.00

3/24/2015 3115078826 3,231,425.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,231,425.520.00

4/28/2015 3115088239 0.00 0.00 121,721.60 0.00 0.00 121,721.600.00

4/28/2015 3115090479 813,089.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 813,089.620.00

5/5/2015 3115090945 0.00 151,167.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 151,167.710.00

6/2/2015 3115102937 0.00 159,294.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 159,294.570.00

6/2/2015 3115102984 3,129,108.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,129,108.300.00

6/2/2015 3115101804 0.00 52,166.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,166.400.00

6/18/2015 3115109035 0.00 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

7/7/2015 3115113106 2,158,204.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,158,204.030.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

CC-215: Decatur Blvd to N. 5th StClark County

739

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

076V-FTI

Final Report

7/7/2015 3115113773 0.00 164,890.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 164,890.220.00

7/28/2015 3115122126 0.00 203,859.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 203,859.370.00

7/28/2015 3115122129 0.00 16,315.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,315.200.00

7/28/2015 3115122140 2,621,301.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,621,301.870.00

7/28/2015 3115122523 0.00 0.00 52,166.40 0.00 0.00 52,166.400.00

8/10/2015 CK#1261471 0.00 -5,672.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5,672.460.00

8/25/2015 3116009421 0.00 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

8/25/2015 3115009011 2,385,403.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,385,403.830.00

8/25/2015 3116009055 0.00 150,430.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,430.080.00

9/28/2015 3116018105 3,263,468.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,263,468.340.00

9/28/2015 3116018046 0.00 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

9/28/2015 3116018069 0.00 191,464.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 191,464.360.00

10/13/2015 3116025459 0.00 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

11/17/2015 3116033602 2,764,095.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,764,095.300.00

11/17/2015 3116033658 0.00 158,012.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 158,012.340.00

12/1/2015 3116037595 0.00 0.00 60,860.80 0.00 0.00 60,860.800.00

12/8/2015 3116043531 3,191,901.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,191,901.510.00

12/22/2015 3116048467 0.00 174,709.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 174,709.470.00

12/22/2015 3116045855 0.00 166,298.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 166,298.270.00

12/22/2015 3116047757 0.00 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

1/12/2016 3116048482 1,202,821.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,202,821.840.00

2/9/2016 3116061257 1,753,540.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,753,540.560.00

2/9/2016 3116061572 0.00 162,579.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 162,579.560.00

2/9/2016 3116060951 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

2/22/2016 3116068026 0.00 0.00 43,472.00 0.00 0.00 43,472.000.00

2/22/2016 3116070982 0.00 4,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,800.000.00

3/1/2016 3116072396 1,879,045.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,879,045.500.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

CC-215: Decatur Blvd to N. 5th StClark County

739

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

076V-FTI

Final Report

3/8/2016 3116072360 0.00 155,603.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 155,603.690.00

3/29/2016 3116084083 1,129,224.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,129,224.350.00

3/29/2016 3116084710 0.00 179,290.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 179,290.390.00

4/13/2016 3116088016 0.00 1,440.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,440.000.00

4/13/2016 3116088014 0.00 0.00 34,777.60 0.00 0.00 34,777.600.00

4/26/2016 3116095623 0.00 52,166.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,166.400.00

4/26/2016 3116095626 0.00 13,320.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,320.000.00

5/17/2016 3116097449 0.00 44,505.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,505.940.00

6/7/2016 3116098423 771,414.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 771,414.660.00

6/7/2016 3116104332 0.00 0.00 43,958.00 0.00 0.00 43,958.000.00

6/7/2016 3116104336 0.00 5,240.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,240.000.00

6/7/2016 3116106671 0.00 74,057.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 74,057.350.00

6/7/2016 3116106980 391,895.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 391,895.970.00

6/21/2016 3116113450 0.00 0.00 47,350.80 0.00 0.00 47,350.800.00

6/28/2016 3116118292 0.00 32,899.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,899.190.00

7/5/2016 3116117675 469,323.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 469,323.220.00

7/19/2016 3116124493 0.00 12,931.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,931.300.00

7/19/2016 3116124514 0.00 3,266.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,266.850.00

8/16/2016 3117003657 0.00 0.00 13,068.80 0.00 0.00 13,068.800.00

8/16/2016 71216 0.00 -16,181.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 -16,181.540.00

8/23/2016 3117005064 479,017.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 479,017.300.00

8/23/2016 3117009997 149,360.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 149,360.770.00

8/30/2016 3117010292 0.00 4,862.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,862.200.00

10/11/2016 3117025281 0.00 4,140.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,140.900.00

10/11/2016 3117025335 156,020.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 156,020.380.00

10/25/2016 3117032152 0.00 1,953.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,953.000.00

11/1/2016 3117031837 61,705.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,705.380.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

CC-215: Decatur Blvd to N. 5th StClark County

739

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

076V-FTI

Final Report

12/6/2016 3117043762 0.00 1,521.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,521.000.00

12/6/2016 3117043509 422,506.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 422,506.460.00

1/10/2017 3117053888 0.00 3,072.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,072.000.00

1/10/2017 3117053903 207,869.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207,869.360.00

1/24/2017 3117061594 0.00 29,404.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,404.500.00

2/27/2017 3017145931(2717C) 0.00 -19,474.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 -19,474.710.00

3/7/2017 3117074741 0.00 12,780.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,780.000.00

3/22/2017 3117081910 0.00 5,646.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,646.790.00

7/10/2017 3117124258 89,471.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89,471.760.00

7/11/2017 6817 0.00 -24,650.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 -24,650.430.00

8/23/2017 62117 -120,577.20 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -120,576.200.00

1/23/2018 3118059813 222,120.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 222,120.190.00

2/6/2018 1018043544 0.00 117,423.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 117,423.260.00

12/12/2018 1019030824 290,125.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 290,125.490.00

TTL 37,342,078.11 3,029,002.92 792,435.20 0.00 0.00 41,163,516.230.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 4 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

CC-215: Decatur Blvd to N. 5th StClark County

739

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

076V-FTI

Final Report

37,342,078.11 3,029,002.92 792,435.20 0.00 0.00 41,163,516.23Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

39,450,000.00 3,700,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 43,150,000.00

2,107,921.89 670,997.08 -792,435.20 0.00 0.00 1,986,483.770.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 5 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 089J-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 089J-FTI; LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD, TONOPAH AVENUE TO CAREY AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance089J-FTI 1,013,785.29$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 820 1,236,214.71$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of North Las Vegas available resources.

6890

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Las Vegas Bl: Tonopah Ave/Carey AveCity of North Las Vegas

820

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

089J-FTI

Final Report

NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

4/28/2015 6600 0.00 2,595.43 0.00 0.00 99.54 2,694.970.00

6/2/2015 6680 0.00 52,289.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,289.960.00

7/14/2015 6758 0.00 2,359.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,359.730.00

8/25/2015 6865-A 0.00 251,274.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 251,274.890.00

8/25/2015 6865-B 0.00 1,743.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,743.240.00

10/6/2015 6948 0.00 3,688.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,688.020.00

11/3/2015 7026 0.00 5,153.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,153.110.00

12/1/2015 7074 0.00 2,952.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,952.770.00

12/3/2015 7126 0.00 845.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 845.640.00

2/2/2016 20015 RTCFTI-012016 0.00 772.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 772.460.00

3/22/2016 7260 0.00 31,712.34 0.00 0.00 601.27 32,313.610.00

5/3/2016 7321 0.00 1,122.42 0.00 0.00 651.87 1,774.290.00

5/24/2016 7366 0.00 2,686.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,686.510.00

7/5/2016 7484 0.00 3,340.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,340.240.00

8/2/2016 7561 0.00 11,203.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,203.960.00

8/2/2016 7618 0.00 28.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.430.00

8/23/2016 7664 0.00 3,547.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,547.320.00

10/5/2016 7734 0.00 3,834.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,834.700.00

10/25/2016 7787 0.00 3,138.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,138.590.00

11/29/2016 7846 0.00 3,071.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,071.730.00

1/10/2017 7900 0.00 2,358.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,358.890.00

1/31/2017 7950 0.00 2,041.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,041.020.00

3/7/2017 7999 0.00 1,521.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,521.520.00

4/4/2017 8054 0.00 917.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 917.410.00

4/18/2017 8100 0.00 1,521.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,521.470.00

5/16/2017 8167 0.00 1,870.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,870.500.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Las Vegas Bl: Tonopah Ave/Carey AveCity of North Las Vegas

820

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

089J-FTI

Final Report

6/20/2017 8228 0.00 50,948.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,948.370.00

7/24/2017 8307 0.00 41,741.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,741.870.00

8/2/2017 8356 0.00 1,003.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,003.740.00

8/22/2017 8377 0.00 49,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,000.000.00

9/11/2017 8403 0.00 3,381.11 0.00 0.00 1,786.23 5,167.340.00

9/26/2017 8455 0.00 1,549.13 0.00 0.00 451.20 2,000.330.00

10/24/2017 8514 0.00 65,771.27 0.00 0.00 1,186.75 66,958.020.00

11/21/2017 8553 0.00 27,315.53 0.00 0.00 113.29 27,428.820.00

1/2/2018 8627 0.00 28,562.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,562.490.00

1/30/2018 8673 0.00 1,982.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,982.090.00

3/14/2018 8722 0.00 918.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 918.410.00

4/4/2018 8772 0.00 2,084.34 0.00 0.00 146.32 2,230.660.00

5/2/2018 8825 0.00 1,934.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,934.760.00

5/30/2018 8913 0.00 92,764.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 92,764.070.00

7/3/2018 8974 0.00 33,907.75 0.00 0.00 234.10 34,141.850.00

8/15/2018 9083B 0.00 307.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 307.800.00

9/5/2018 9128 0.00 3,497.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,497.790.00

10/3/2018 9172 0.00 3,444.15 0.00 0.00 965.40 4,409.550.00

10/31/2018 9222 0.00 22,694.60 0.00 0.00 1,962.91 24,657.510.00

11/7/2018 9083A 0.00 35,063.62 0.00 0.00 29.34 35,092.960.00

12/19/2018 9255 0.00 11,231.16 0.00 0.00 1,868.87 13,100.030.00

4/3/2019 9297 0.00 13,971.12 0.00 0.00 15,181.10 29,152.220.00

4/3/2019 9337 0.00 4,219.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,219.520.00

4/3/2019 9385 0.00 3,835.03 0.00 0.00 5,296.23 9,131.260.00

4/10/2019 9424 0.00 239.86 0.00 0.00 2,212.52 2,452.380.00

6/5/2019 9518 0.00 8,303.57 0.00 0.00 1,910.19 10,213.760.00

7/3/2019 9575 0.00 3,291.37 0.00 0.00 6,727.46 10,018.830.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Las Vegas Bl: Tonopah Ave/Carey AveCity of North Las Vegas

820

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

089J-FTI

Final Report

7/17/2019 9477 0.00 11,298.78 0.00 0.00 9,988.13 21,286.910.00

7/24/2019 9647 0.00 4,139.72 0.00 0.00 4,581.75 8,721.470.00

8/21/2019 9700 0.00 2,035.47 0.00 0.00 3,311.78 5,347.250.00

10/10/2019 9772 0.00 10,208.74 0.00 0.00 2,952.97 13,161.710.00

11/6/2019 9813 0.00 12,897.04 0.00 0.00 396.25 13,293.290.00

1/16/2020 9813 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -6.75 -6.750.00

TTL 0.00 951,136.57 0.00 0.00 62,648.72 1,013,785.290.00

0.00 951,136.57 0.00 0.00 62,648.72 1,013,785.29Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 2,150,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.000.00 2,250,000.00

0.00 1,198,863.43 0.00 0.00 37,351.28 1,236,214.710.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 092C-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 092C-FTI; SUMMERLIN PARKWAY, CC-215 TO US-95 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance092C-FTI 8,486,019.26$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 845 413,980.74$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Las Vegas available resources.

6885

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Summerlin Parkway, CC-215 to US-95City of Las Vegas

845

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

092C-FTI

Final Report

LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

4/8/2015 184237 0.00 34,870.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,870.380.00

5/5/2015 186777 0.00 2,056.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,056.740.00

6/18/2015 189537 0.00 55,489.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,489.680.00

7/14/2015 190015 0.00 23,212.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,212.900.00

7/28/2015 192477 0.00 32,523.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,523.070.00

9/1/2015 194798 0.00 97,068.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 97,068.350.00

9/8/2015 195234 0.00 4,697.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,697.940.00

10/16/2015 196090 0.00 4,800.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,800.730.00

11/17/2015 198437 0.00 25,790.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,790.180.00

12/22/2015 199897 0.00 10,832.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,832.610.00

12/29/2015 201739 0.00 37,052.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,052.180.00

2/22/2016 205898 0.00 8,987.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,987.090.00

3/8/2016 206997 0.00 14,310.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,310.920.00

5/3/2016 211797 0.00 12,359.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,359.300.00

5/17/2016 213137 0.00 31,664.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,664.620.00

6/7/2016 214598 0.00 14,738.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,738.010.00

7/19/2016 217198 0.00 15,373.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,373.990.00

8/16/2016 219997 0.00 18,082.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,082.120.00

8/30/2016 220776 0.00 13,504.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,504.800.00

10/11/2016 221179 32,509.53 3,535.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,045.090.00

10/18/2016 222538 0.00 39,760.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,760.720.00

11/22/2016 223493 20,421.73 20,245.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,667.350.00

11/22/2016 221917 26,431.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,431.870.00

12/13/2016 224826 13,442.69 26,421.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,864.680.00

1/10/2017 225280 16,957.43 42,076.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 59,034.130.00

1/31/2017 225848 25,257.01 102,710.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 127,967.160.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Summerlin Parkway, CC-215 to US-95City of Las Vegas

845

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

092C-FTI

Final Report

3/7/2017 226799 293,426.87 59,540.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 352,966.880.00

4/4/2017 227237 226,496.25 71,156.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 297,652.870.00

4/18/2017 227874 565,569.90 57,144.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 622,714.760.00

6/27/2017 130138503 -62,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -62,500.000.00

7/3/2017 229517 0.00 98,009.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,009.010.00

8/8/2017 233917 117,692.84 119,262.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 236,955.030.00

8/29/2017 236817 0.00 4,306.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,306.080.00

8/29/2017 237098 417,231.48 45,087.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 462,319.230.00

9/11/2017 237397 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.000.00

9/19/2017 237597 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.000.00

10/12/2017 Check No. 130142237 0.00 -5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5,000.000.00

10/18/2017 240757 0.00 12,727.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,727.600.00

12/5/2017 240057 4,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,800.000.00

12/5/2017 244777 34,214.75 13,691.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,905.980.00

12/12/2017 244217 12,377.54 7,346.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,723.560.00

1/2/2018 247897 0.00 11,445.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,445.660.00

1/23/2018 232237 907,415.93 11,098.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 918,514.850.00

3/7/2018 252071 14,646.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,646.740.00

3/21/2018 253138 51,691.52 9,847.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,538.520.00

4/25/2018 256197 370,263.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 370,263.300.00

5/2/2018 228341 405,213.77 150,556.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 555,770.330.00

5/30/2018 257718 508,333.67 1,262.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 509,596.140.00

7/3/2018 258378 153,163.32 10,375.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 163,538.640.00

10/3/2018 269317 2,845.27 1,911.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,756.880.00

11/7/2018 271745 103,206.40 1,868.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 105,075.110.00

12/12/2018 272561 1,487,553.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,487,553.210.00

12/19/2018 265657 468,452.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 468,452.970.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Summerlin Parkway, CC-215 to US-95City of Las Vegas

845

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

092C-FTI

Final Report

1/24/2019 274199 2,351.32 32,544.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,895.850.00

1/30/2019 275560 27,589.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,589.030.00

2/13/2019 275937 746,342.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 746,342.180.00

2/27/2019 276641 4,032.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,032.750.00

3/27/2019 278057 10,160.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,160.280.00

4/24/2019 279737 2,238.61 45,609.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,847.610.00

5/30/2019 281197 1,358.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,358.680.00

6/26/2019 283458 108.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 108.420.00

8/29/2019 289577 0.00 12,764.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,764.500.00

TTL 7,011,297.26 1,474,722.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,486,019.260.00

7,011,297.26 1,474,722.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,486,019.26Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

7,000,000.00 1,900,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 8,900,000.00

-11,297.26 425,278.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 413,980.740.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 100D-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 100D-FTI; I-215 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance100D-FTI 1,021,174.31$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 949 978,825.69$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Henderson available resources.

6893

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

I-515 at I-215 Interchange ImprovementsCity of Henderson

949

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

100D-FTI

Final Report

CA GROUP

4/3/2019 CAG-2172-1 0.00 124,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124,000.000.00

5/15/2019 CAG-2172-2 0.00 136,976.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 136,976.430.00

6/26/2019 CAG-2172-3 0.00 238,356.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 238,356.160.00

7/31/2019 CAG-2172-4 0.00 122,505.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 122,505.460.00

10/16/2019 CAG-2172-5 0.00 77,338.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 77,338.850.00

11/20/2019 CAG-2172-6 0.00 169,684.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169,684.000.00

1/8/2020 CAG-2172-7 0.00 143,105.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 143,105.750.00

TTL 0.00 1,011,966.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,011,966.650.00

HENDERSON, CITY OF

5/15/2019 MSC-5031093 0.00 495.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 495.000.00

5/30/2019 MSC-5031199 0.00 902.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 902.530.00

7/3/2019 MSC-5031021 0.00 409.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 409.820.00

7/17/2019 MSC-5031415 0.00 4,070.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,070.150.00

7/31/2019 MSC-5031634 0.00 910.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 910.330.00

8/7/2019 MSC-5031715 0.00 1,709.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,709.260.00

10/10/2019 MSC-5031989 0.00 178.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 178.380.00

12/4/2019 MSC-5032342 0.00 532.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 532.190.00

TTL 0.00 9,207.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,207.660.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

I-515 at I-215 Interchange ImprovementsCity of Henderson

949

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

100D-FTI

Final Report

0.00 1,021,174.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,021,174.31Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 2,000,000.00

0.00 978,825.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 978,825.690.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 128H-FTI AND 128H-MVFT PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 128H-FTI AND 128H-MVFT; KYLE CANYON INTERCHANGE AT US-95 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance128H-FTI 8,689,854.20$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 864 418,145.80$

128H-MVFT 325,514.61$ Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Funds 555 490,485.39$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Las Vegas available resources.

6886

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Kyle Canyon Interchange at US-95City of Las Vegas

864

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

128H-FTI

Final Report

LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

1/5/2016 201617 0.00 9,307.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,307.690.00

1/5/2016 199778 0.00 7,770.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,770.600.00

2/22/2016 204437 0.00 345,863.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 345,863.360.00

5/17/2016 212981 0.00 198,259.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 198,259.500.00

5/24/2016 211918 0.00 296,989.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 296,989.760.00

6/7/2016 214639 0.00 76,037.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 76,037.500.00

6/21/2016 207197 0.00 931.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 931.120.00

7/5/2016 217398 0.00 51,545.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,545.800.00

7/5/2016 217417 0.00 211.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 211.720.00

8/16/2016 219717 0.00 211.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 211.720.00

8/16/2016 220097 0.00 198,096.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 198,096.200.00

8/30/2016 220779 0.00 147,464.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 147,464.700.00

10/18/2016 222297 0.00 316.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 316.620.00

11/22/2016 223501 0.00 2,491.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,491.700.00

12/13/2016 224832 0.00 76,931.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 76,931.740.00

1/3/2017 225298 0.00 48,266.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,266.250.00

2/7/2017 214640 0.00 211.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 211.720.00

2/7/2017 225833 0.00 40,464.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,464.990.00

3/7/2017 226804 0.00 3,105.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,105.260.00

3/28/2017 227297 0.00 37,410.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,410.710.00

4/25/2017 227878 0.00 4,407.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,407.490.00

6/6/2017 228345 0.00 64,691.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,691.420.00

6/20/2017 229597 0.00 1,388.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,388.260.00

8/8/2017 233977 0.00 38,522.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,522.020.00

8/29/2017 235957 0.00 48,658.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,658.550.00

8/29/2017 236877 0.00 1,253.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,253.630.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 3

Kyle Canyon Interchange at US-95City of Las Vegas

864

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

128H-FTI

Final Report

10/18/2017 240657 0.00 999.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 999.220.00

12/5/2017 245037 0.00 2,095.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,095.700.00

12/5/2017 244037 0.00 86,672.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 86,672.580.00

1/2/2018 247997 0.00 7,791.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,791.480.00

1/23/2018 232317 0.00 47,366.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,366.950.00

1/30/2018 250953 0.00 2,684.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,684.160.00

3/7/2018 252082 0.00 3,024.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,024.240.00

5/2/2018 256137 0.00 19,560.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,560.180.00

5/22/2018 130150860 0.00 -11,018.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 -11,018.420.00

5/30/2018 257714 0.00 21,786.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,786.220.00

6/6/2018 257734 0.00 363.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 363.460.00

6/27/2018 258377 0.00 2,490.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,490.180.00

8/1/2018 261537 0.00 13,985.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,985.460.00

8/29/2018 264637 0.00 4,130.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,130.500.00

9/5/2018 265857 0.00 4,929.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,929.000.00

10/3/2018 269377 0.00 7,963.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,963.250.00

11/14/2018 271749 0.00 3,255.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,255.630.00

1/24/2019 274220 0.00 1,519.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,519.910.00

1/30/2019 275582 0.00 9,254.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,254.690.00

2/27/2019 276684 0.00 13,320.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,320.390.00

3/20/2019 276097 6,700,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,700,000.000.00

3/27/2019 278060 3,463.48 4,929.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,392.480.00

4/24/2019 279517 3,745.45 4,929.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,674.450.00

5/30/2019 281299 3,435.32 4,929.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,364.320.00

6/26/2019 283494 2,676.66 4,929.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,605.660.00

6/30/2019 201617 (JE2025) 0.00 -9,307.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 -9,307.690.00

6/30/2019 272623b (JE2025) 0.00 13,001.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,001.190.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 3

Kyle Canyon Interchange at US-95City of Las Vegas

864

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

128H-FTI

Final Report

6/30/2019 286597 0.00 8,564.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,564.550.00

8/29/2019 290997 1,063.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,063.370.00

9/25/2019 294278 348.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 348.660.00

10/30/2019 297017 162.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 162.400.00

TTL 6,714,895.34 1,974,958.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,689,854.200.00

6,714,895.34 1,974,958.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,689,854.20Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

6,950,000.00 2,148,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.000.00 9,108,000.00

235,104.66 173,041.14 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 418,145.800.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 3

Kyle Canyon Interchange at US-95City of Las Vegas

555

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

128H

Final Report

LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

10/16/2007 120272 0.00 3,196.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,196.140.00

12/11/2007 121181 0.00 2,462.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,462.800.00

1/16/2008 121680 0.00 10,525.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,525.560.00

2/27/2008 122028 0.00 26,980.41 0.00 0.00 332.02 27,312.430.00

4/14/2008 122755 0.00 49,421.03 0.00 0.00 17,996.05 67,417.080.00

5/13/2008 123249 0.00 20,854.40 0.00 0.00 719.39 21,573.790.00

6/12/2008 123767 0.00 42,735.36 0.00 0.00 806.09 43,541.450.00

7/10/2008 124129 0.00 24,150.54 0.00 0.00 940.73 25,091.270.00

7/24/2008 124348 0.00 16,081.59 0.00 0.00 110.68 16,192.270.00

12/10/2008 127355 0.00 1,094.43 0.00 0.00 114.54 1,208.970.00

12/10/2008 124828 0.00 2,862.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,862.440.00

12/16/2008 128073 0.00 3,026.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,026.700.00

1/27/2009 128622 0.00 441.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 441.080.00

2/20/2009 129097 0.00 15,803.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,803.760.00

4/20/2009 130348 0.00 14,602.00 0.00 0.00 64.50 14,666.500.00

6/25/2009 131781 0.00 3,880.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,880.000.00

7/27/2009 132403 0.00 77.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.240.00

12/14/2009 134346 0.00 350.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.280.00

9/23/2014 175395 0.00 195.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.250.00

10/6/2014 175690 0.00 292.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 292.880.00

2/10/2015 180978 0.00 14,449.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,449.000.00

5/5/2015 186559 0.00 99.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.090.00

7/28/2015 192037 0.00 1,014.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,014.120.00

9/1/2015 194497 0.00 3,560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,560.000.00

9/8/2015 195215 0.00 1,747.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,747.100.00

10/20/2015 196073 0.00 1,916.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,916.340.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 2

Kyle Canyon Interchange at US-95City of Las Vegas

555

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

128H

Final Report

11/24/2015 198017 0.00 25,199.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,199.760.00

1/6/2016 199778 0.00 7,896.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,896.700.00

5/24/2016 212980 0.00 206.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 206.920.00

12/12/2018 272623 0.00 13,001.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,001.190.00

6/30/2019 201617b (JE2025) 0.00 9,307.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,307.690.00

6/30/2019 272623 (JE2025) 0.00 -13,001.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 -13,001.190.00

6/30/2019 286597 0.00 -8,564.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 -8,564.550.00

8/21/2019 286597 0.00 8,564.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,564.550.00

TTL 0.00 304,430.61 0.00 0.00 21,084.00 325,514.610.00

0.00 304,430.61 0.00 0.00 21,084.00 325,514.61Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 794,000.00 0.00 0.00 22,000.000.00 816,000.00

0.00 489,569.39 0.00 0.00 916.00 490,485.390.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 2

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 152D-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 152D-FTI; I-15 AT STARR AVENUE INTERCHANGE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance152D-FTI 29,288,190.27$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 947 5,991,809.73$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Henderson available resources.

6894

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

I-15 at Starr Avenue InterchangeCity of Henderson

947

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

152D-FTI

Final Report

NDOT

7/11/2018 NDOT-03683J1301 7,005,141.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,005,141.210.00

TTL 7,005,141.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,005,141.210.00

STATE OF NV, DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION

6/26/2019 NDOT-03683J1302 12,257,604.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,257,604.790.00

12/18/2019 NDOT-03683J1303 10,025,444.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,025,444.270.00

TTL 22,283,049.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,283,049.060.00

29,288,190.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,288,190.27Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

35,280,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 35,280,000.00

5,991,809.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,991,809.730.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 173C-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 173C-FTI; SAWTOOTH ROADS II (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance173C-FTI $ 15,715,750.48 Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 775 $ 1,270,249.52

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of North Las Vegas available resources.

6891

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Sawtooth Roads IICity of North Las Vegas

775

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

173C-FTI

Final Report

Disallowed

NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

6/24/2014 5940 0.00 20,143.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,143.620.00 $0.00

7/30/2014 6015 0.00 22,754.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,754.390.00 $0.00

8/20/2014 6088 0.00 791.31 35.61 0.00 0.00 826.920.00 $0.00

8/27/2014 6088 0.00 11,869.69 534.17 0.00 0.00 12,403.860.00 $0.00

9/23/2014 6141 0.00 9,933.11 0.00 0.00 4,421.44 14,354.550.00 $0.00

10/20/2014 6207 0.00 57,742.70 0.00 0.00 5,106.24 62,848.940.00 $0.00

12/1/2014 6281 0.00 73,853.39 0.00 0.00 2,661.41 76,514.800.00 $0.00

12/16/2014 6337 0.00 114,761.61 0.00 0.00 1,712.67 116,474.280.00 $0.00

1/27/2015 6413 0.00 155,468.71 0.00 0.00 1,237.77 156,706.480.00 $0.00

3/2/2015 6469 0.00 41,543.45 0.00 0.00 1,581.26 43,124.710.00 $0.00

3/24/2015 6529 0.00 195,616.26 0.00 0.00 1,216.01 196,832.270.00 $0.00

4/28/2015 6595 0.00 43,049.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,049.450.00 $0.00

6/2/2015 6675 0.00 13,727.73 0.00 0.00 2,043.17 15,770.900.00 $0.00

7/14/2015 6752 0.00 43,833.12 0.00 0.00 6,629.22 50,462.340.00 $0.00

8/25/2015 6868-A 0.00 92,422.87 0.00 0.00 11,776.89 104,199.760.00 $0.00

8/25/2015 6868-B 0.00 4,420.40 0.00 0.00 1,370.80 5,791.200.00 $0.00

10/6/2015 6942 0.00 31,490.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,490.300.00 $0.00

10/6/2015 6942 0.00 106,083.96 0.00 0.00 8,358.77 114,442.730.00 $0.00

11/3/2015 7020 0.00 64,574.15 0.00 0.00 24,709.72 89,283.870.00 $0.00

12/1/2015 7068 0.00 31,668.24 0.00 0.00 12,141.98 43,810.220.00 $0.00

12/29/2015 7121 0.00 145,694.29 0.00 0.00 17,454.56 163,148.850.00 $0.00

2/2/201610388 RTCFTI-012016 0.00 101,592.61 0.00 0.00 11,551.39 113,144.000.00 $0.00

3/8/2016 7155 0.00 6,166.48 0.00 0.00 15,452.94 21,619.420.00 $0.00

5/3/2016 7315 0.00 73,114.71 0.00 0.00 80,289.85 153,404.560.00 $0.00

6/7/2016 7359 0.00 10,736.41 0.00 10,476.00 6,960.09 28,172.500.00 $0.00

7/5/2016 7477 0.00 22,528.83 0.00 0.00 23,781.57 46,310.400.00 $0.00

8/2/2016 7553 0.00 26,837.56 0.00 0.00 7,232.71 34,070.270.00 $0.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 1 of 5

Sawtooth Roads IICity of North Las Vegas

775

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

173C-FTI

Final Report

Disallowed

8/2/2016 7610-A 0.00 658.64 0.00 0.00 1,219.96 1,878.600.00 $0.00

8/2/2016 7629-A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,187.15 1,187.150.00 $0.00

8/2/2016 7629-B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.000.00 $0.00

8/9/2016 7610-B 0.00 14,863.74 0.00 40,081.00 6,512.08 61,456.820.00 $0.00

8/23/2016 7657 0.00 8,622.08 0.00 0.00 2,529.02 11,151.100.00 $0.00

10/25/2016 7779 0.00 8,171.29 0.00 0.00 7,076.70 15,247.990.00 $0.00

11/1/2016 7725 0.00 28,537.35 0.00 64,115.00 26,885.58 55,422.930.00 ($64,115.00)

11/15/2016 7808-B 0.00 16,002.20 0.00 0.00 225.00 16,227.200.00 $0.00

11/29/2016 7839 0.00 7,965.12 0.00 0.00 6,800.60 14,765.720.00 $0.00

1/10/2017 7893 0.00 28,966.20 0.00 0.00 6,942.69 35,908.890.00 $0.00

1/31/2017 7942 0.00 19,433.80 0.00 0.00 2,322.73 21,756.530.00 $0.00

3/7/2017 7991 0.00 10,149.83 0.00 0.00 3,153.65 13,303.480.00 $0.00

4/11/2017 8046 160,957.06 86,395.87 0.00 0.00 4,030.00 251,382.930.00 $0.00

4/18/2017 8082 298,864.45 98,983.33 0.00 0.00 2,559.72 400,407.500.00 $0.00

5/16/2017 8158 68,837.50 18,453.29 0.00 0.00 2,332.80 89,623.590.00 $0.00

6/20/2017 8219 0.00 136,318.21 0.00 0.00 2,233.05 138,551.260.00 $0.00

6/20/2017 8220 0.00 1,827.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,827.470.00 $0.00

7/24/2017 8298 0.00 1,350.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,350.090.00 $0.00

7/24/2017 8297 968,092.15 27,519.39 0.00 0.00 2,330.65 997,942.190.00 $0.00

8/2/2017 8359 353,032.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 353,032.750.00 $0.00

8/2/2017 8348 0.00 1,069.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,069.100.00 $0.00

8/2/2017 8347-A 0.00 1,958.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,958.710.00 $0.00

8/2/2017 8347-B 0.00 4,870.55 0.00 0.00 225.59 5,096.140.00 $0.00

8/22/2017 8375-A 0.00 43,320.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,320.000.00 $0.00

8/22/2017 8375-B 0.00 3,011.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,011.310.00 $0.00

8/31/2017 8393 0.00 41,638.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,638.210.00 $0.00

9/11/2017 8394 0.00 2,448.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,448.210.00 $0.00

9/26/2017 8446 0.00 14,462.45 0.00 0.00 1,002.03 15,464.480.00 $0.00

9/26/2017 8447 0.00 1,377.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,377.440.00 $0.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 2 of 5

Sawtooth Roads IICity of North Las Vegas

775

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

173C-FTI

Final Report

Disallowed

10/24/2017 8505 145,902.00 32,162.47 0.00 0.00 3,790.16 181,854.630.00 $0.00

10/24/2017 8506 0.00 12,456.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,456.400.00 $0.00

11/21/2017 8544 147,254.86 31,832.32 0.00 0.00 3,784.05 182,871.230.00 $0.00

11/21/2017 8545 0.00 4,677.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,677.790.00 $0.00

12/5/2017 1092E 0.00 0.00 0.00 -41,557.00 -50,358.00 -91,915.000.00 $0.00

1/2/2018 8618 0.00 31,888.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,888.970.00 $0.00

1/9/2018 8617 558,179.93 37,380.16 0.00 0.00 1,055.48 596,615.570.00 $0.00

1/30/2018 8665 0.00 33,583.11 0.00 0.00 451.19 34,034.300.00 $0.00

1/30/2018 8666 0.00 2,331.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,331.670.00 $0.00

2/6/2018 8661 739,577.05 2,430.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 742,007.850.00 $0.00

2/20/2018 1149 0.00 0.00 0.00 -9,000.00 -1,761.00 -10,761.000.00 $0.00

3/14/2018 8714 919,165.90 52,792.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 971,958.360.00 $0.00

3/14/2018 8715 0.00 1,018.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,018.770.00 $0.00

4/4/2018 8758 0.00 4,947.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,947.000.00 $0.00

4/4/2018 8784 675,346.90 18,984.52 0.00 0.00 1,000.86 695,332.280.00 $0.00

5/2/2018 8814 562,471.04 43,171.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 605,642.880.00 $0.00

5/2/2018 8815 0.00 907.99 0.00 0.00 2,714.92 3,622.910.00 $0.00

5/30/2018 8899 548,335.68 53,610.59 0.00 0.00 807.50 602,753.770.00 $0.00

5/30/2018 8900 0.00 9,479.71 0.00 0.00 3,977.93 13,457.640.00 $0.00

7/3/2018 8960 0.00 2,596.49 0.00 0.00 2,028.37 4,624.860.00 $0.00

7/3/2018 8959 1,181,364.40 65,693.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,247,057.820.00 $0.00

8/15/2018 9070A 0.00 416.10 0.00 0.00 710.12 1,126.220.00 $0.00

9/5/2018 9116 0.00 441.29 0.00 0.00 203.12 644.410.00 $0.00

9/12/2018 9115A 0.00 1,676.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,676.110.00 $0.00

9/12/2018 9115B 139,055.60 36,931.08 0.00 0.00 233.31 176,219.990.00 $0.00

10/3/2018 9158 0.00 37,951.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,951.190.00 $0.00

10/3/2018 9159 0.00 1,247.63 0.00 0.00 135.41 1,383.040.00 $0.00

10/10/2018 9069B 0.00 13,330.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,330.950.00 $0.00

10/10/2018 9070B 0.00 153.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 153.910.00 $0.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 3 of 5

Sawtooth Roads IICity of North Las Vegas

775

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

173C-FTI

Final Report

Disallowed

10/10/2018 9069A 997,238.99 51,478.29 0.00 0.00 -4.80 1,048,712.480.00 $0.00

10/31/2018 9211 0.00 680.59 0.00 0.00 270.85 951.440.00 $0.00

11/7/2018 9210 843,841.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 843,841.780.00 $0.00

12/12/2018 9244 0.00 307.88 0.00 0.00 541.63 849.510.00 $0.00

12/19/2018 9243 20,745.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,745.940.00 $0.00

1/16/2019 9285 702,709.34 60,259.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 762,969.110.00 $0.00

1/16/2019 9286 0.00 1,351.54 0.00 0.00 1,371.66 2,723.200.00 $0.00

2/6/2019 9328 67,862.50 10,558.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 78,421.380.00 $0.00

2/6/2019 9329 0.00 696.20 0.00 0.00 1,486.39 2,182.590.00 $0.00

3/20/2019 9374 30,804.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,804.930.00 $0.00

3/20/2019 9375 0.00 2,605.51 0.00 0.00 4,368.39 6,973.900.00 $0.00

4/24/2019 9414 79,207.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,207.590.00 $0.00

4/24/2019 9415 0.00 751.81 0.00 0.00 1,387.54 2,139.350.00 $0.00

6/5/2019 9509 0.00 102.63 0.00 0.00 995.47 1,098.100.00 $0.00

6/12/2019 9508 633,594.13 46,573.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 680,167.900.00 $0.00

7/3/2019 9562 275,483.44 37,156.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 312,639.920.00 $0.00

7/3/2019 9563 0.00 415.08 0.00 0.00 4,095.19 4,510.270.00 $0.00

7/17/2019 9466 0.00 1,282.69 0.00 0.00 1,017.81 2,300.500.00 $0.00

7/24/2019 9465 283,470.06 33,341.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 316,811.590.00 $0.00

7/24/2019 9631 188,553.67 32,656.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 221,210.660.00 $0.00

7/31/2019 9632 0.00 33.87 0.00 0.00 119.63 153.500.00 $0.00

8/21/2019 9706 0.00 15,691.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,691.690.00 $0.00

8/21/2019 9686 0.00 51.16 0.00 0.00 396.37 447.530.00 $0.00

10/2/2019 9756 584,546.35 22,964.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 607,511.110.00 $0.00

10/10/2019 9757 0.00 768.01 0.00 0.00 876.00 1,644.010.00 $0.00

10/30/2019 9794 149,421.62 13,988.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 163,410.240.00 $0.00

11/6/2019 9795 0.00 442.16 0.00 0.00 20,538.12 20,980.280.00 $0.00

12/4/2019 9848 9,453.10 7,506.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,959.780.00 $0.00

12/4/2019 9849 0.00 170.58 0.00 0.00 5,841.77 6,012.350.00 $0.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 4 of 5

Sawtooth Roads IICity of North Las Vegas

775

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

173C-FTI

Final Report

Disallowed

1/8/2020 9904-B 0.00 1,352.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,352.420.00 $0.00

1/8/2020 9905-A 0.00 255.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 255.280.00 $0.00

1/8/2020 9904-A 0.00 8,519.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,519.020.00 $0.00

1/8/2020 9905-B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.88 59.880.00 $0.00

1/16/2020 9795 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -191.79 -191.790.00 $0.00

2/5/2020 9991-A 0.00 1,460.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,460.430.00 $0.00

2/5/2020 9991-B 0.00 254.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 254.220.00 $0.00

2/12/2020 9989 0.00 135.53 0.00 0.00 411.17 546.700.00 $0.00

2/12/2020 10000 0.00 3,108.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,108.210.00 $0.00

2/12/2020 10003 0.00 135.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 135.580.00 $0.00

TTL 12,333,370.71 3,041,945.83 569.78 64,115.00 339,864.16 15,779,865.480.00 -64,115.00

12,333,370.71 3,041,945.83 569.78 64,115.00 339,864.16 15,715,750.48Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

14,326,000.00 2,535,000.00 0.00 0.00 125,000.000.00 16,986,000.00

1,992,629.29 -506,945.83 -569.78 -64,115.00 -214,864.16 1,270,249.520.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

-64,115.00

0.00

64,115.00

Disallowed

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 5 of 5

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 175C-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 175C-FTI; NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION, GREEN VALLEY PARKWAY TO ARROYO GRANDE BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance175C-FTI 7,045,629.31$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 735 425,370.69$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Henderson available resources.

6895

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Neighborhood Rehab: Green Valley - Arroyo Grande BlvdCity of Henderson

735

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

175C-FTI

Final Report

ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS

4/4/2018 ARC-9591931 0.00 321.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 321.580.00

6/13/2018 ARC-9354784 0.00 222.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 222.380.00

TTL 0.00 543.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 543.960.00

GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL

6/27/2017 GES-27339 0.00 10,680.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,680.000.00

7/24/2017 GES-27451 0.00 7,120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,120.000.00

TTL 0.00 17,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,800.000.00

HENDERSON, CITY OF

7/10/2014 MSC-5020687 0.00 10,962.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,962.790.00

7/30/2014 MSC-5020780 0.00 1,963.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,963.620.00

7/30/2014 MSC-5020793 74,601.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74,601.540.00

8/4/2014 MSC-5020865 0.00 3,049.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,049.610.00

10/13/2014 MSC-5021233 0.00 1,724.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,724.530.00

12/2/2014 MSC-5021485 0.00 957.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 957.890.00

12/8/2014 MSC-5021551 0.00 1,794.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,794.920.00

12/8/2014 MSC-5021603 0.00 1,032.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,032.250.00

3/24/2015 MSC-5022176 0.00 861.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 861.430.00

3/24/2015 MSC-5022216 0.00 1,338.09 0.00 0.00 66.83 1,404.920.00

3/24/2015 MSC-5022260 0.00 892.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 892.930.00

4/28/2015 MSC-5022410 0.00 577.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 577.150.00

6/9/2015 MSC-5022649 0.00 1,177.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,177.800.00

6/9/2015 MSC-5022651 0.00 1,939.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,939.630.00

6/18/2015 MSC-5022698 0.00 2,416.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,416.450.00

7/16/2015 MSC-5022909 0.00 3,932.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,932.770.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Neighborhood Rehab: Green Valley - Arroyo Grande BlvdCity of Henderson

735

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

175C-FTI

Final Report

8/25/2015 MSC-5023119 0.00 3,925.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,925.450.00

10/27/2015 MSC-5023531 0.00 1,348.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,348.570.00

10/27/2015 MSC-5023570 0.00 4,691.75 0.00 0.00 136.43 4,828.180.00

12/8/2015 MSC-5023836 0.00 3,607.42 0.00 0.00 204.65 3,812.070.00

12/22/2015 MSC-5023957 0.00 3,021.43 0.00 0.00 1,064.24 4,085.670.00

1/19/2016 MSC-5024111 0.00 1,448.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,448.300.00

3/22/2016 MSC-5024431 0.00 2,252.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,252.360.00

3/22/2016 MSC-5024483 0.00 1,519.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,519.040.00

6/7/2016 MSC-5024922 0.00 1,916.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,916.670.00

6/7/2016 MSC-5024980 0.00 1,591.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,591.170.00

6/14/2016 MSC-5025024 0.00 1,083.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,083.830.00

7/5/2016 MSC-5025141 0.00 250.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.800.00

7/26/2016 MSC-5025330 0.00 676.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 676.210.00

9/13/2016 MSC-5025598 0.00 2,016.22 0.00 0.00 102.32 2,118.540.00

10/18/2016 MSC-5025775 0.00 9,460.79 341.08 0.00 0.00 9,801.870.00

11/15/2016 MSC-5025962 0.00 7,401.26 0.00 0.00 138.66 7,539.920.00

11/29/2016 MSC-5026203 0.00 936.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 936.280.00

3/7/2017 MSC-5026681 0.00 763.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 763.580.00

4/4/2017 MSC-5026844 0.00 2,087.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,087.590.00

5/8/2017 MSC-5027029 0.00 86.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 86.590.00

5/30/2017 MSC-5027170 0.00 3,596.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,596.670.00

7/10/2017 MSC-5027351 0.00 8,225.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,225.100.00

8/2/2017 MSC-5027499 0.00 5,845.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,845.650.00

9/11/2017 MSC-5027736 0.00 942.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 942.570.00

10/18/2017 MSC-5027937 0.00 2,904.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,904.150.00

11/14/2017 MSC-5028124 0.00 4,751.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,751.350.00

12/5/2017 MSC-5028220 0.00 4,565.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,565.010.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Neighborhood Rehab: Green Valley - Arroyo Grande BlvdCity of Henderson

735

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

175C-FTI

Final Report

1/9/2018 MSC-5028388 0.00 3,186.31 0.00 0.00 532.39 3,718.700.00

1/30/2018 MSC-5028558 2,460.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,460.850.00

3/14/2018 MSC-5028813 0.00 3,297.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,297.510.00

4/4/2018 MSC-5028961 0.00 5,317.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,317.630.00

5/2/2018 MSC-5023110 0.00 9,007.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,007.080.00

5/30/2018 MSC-5029321 19,186.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,186.390.00

6/27/2018 MSC-5029465 22,126.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,126.980.00

8/1/2018 MSC-5029721 12,957.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,957.010.00

9/12/2018 MSC-5029881 0.00 15,493.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,493.230.00

10/10/2018 MSC-5030110 22,080.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,080.520.00

11/21/2018 MSC-5030277 20,055.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,055.390.00

12/12/2018 MSC-5030405 17,025.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,025.250.00

1/24/2019 MSC-5030585 13,417.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,417.520.00

2/6/2019 MSC-5030669 3,643.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,643.200.00

3/20/2019 MSC-5030778 8,796.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,796.400.00

3/27/2019 MSC-5030932 10,750.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,750.890.00

5/8/2019 MSC-5030834 1,346.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,346.400.00

5/30/2019 MSC-5031189 1,354.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,354.640.00

6/26/2019 MSC-5031012 2,915.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,915.170.00

6/30/2019MSC-5022649 (JE2024) 0.00 -1,177.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,177.800.00

7/31/2019 MSC-5031624 2,408.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,408.600.00

8/7/2019 MSC-5031705 2,492.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,492.980.00

TTL 237,619.73 150,661.63 341.08 0.00 2,245.52 390,867.960.00

HORROCKS ENGINEERS

10/24/2017 H-44610 0.00 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,250.000.00

6/13/2018 H-46752 3,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,200.000.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Neighborhood Rehab: Green Valley - Arroyo Grande BlvdCity of Henderson

735

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

175C-FTI

Final Report

TTL 3,200.00 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,450.000.00

JACOB CIVIL

7/22/2014 JE-W4X576000714 0.00 44,636.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,636.500.00

9/23/2014 JE-W4X589000914 0.00 13,173.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,173.500.00

9/23/2014 JE-W4X589000814 0.00 17,641.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,641.000.00

11/19/2014 JE-W4X589001014 0.00 102,027.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102,027.000.00

1/20/2015 JAC-W4X589001214 0.00 13,919.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,919.500.00

TTL 0.00 191,397.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 191,397.500.00

JACOBS CIVIL

7/31/2014 JE-W4X589000714 0.00 1,132.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,132.000.00

1/13/2015 JE-W4X589001114 0.00 32,384.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,384.960.00

3/2/2015 JE-W4X58900215 0.00 46,397.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,397.100.00

4/13/2015 JE-W4X589000315 0.00 8,636.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,636.150.00

6/2/2015 JE-W4X589000415 0.00 34,300.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,300.940.00

6/2/2015 JE-W4X589000515 0.00 9,258.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,258.420.00

TTL 0.00 132,109.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,109.570.00

JACOBS ENGINEERING

8/4/2015 JE-W4X589000715 0.00 46,650.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,650.850.00

9/14/2015 JE-W4X589000815 0.00 4,155.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,155.000.00

12/1/2015 JE-W4X589000915 0.00 12,590.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,590.250.00

12/1/2015 JE-W4X589001015 0.00 14,329.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,329.250.00

1/5/2016 JE-W4X589001115 0.00 15,809.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,809.000.00

1/5/2016 JE-W4X589001215 0.00 1,983.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,983.000.00

3/8/2016 JE-W4X589000116 0.00 2,399.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,399.000.00

6/21/2016 JE-W4X589000216 0.00 983.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 983.000.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 4 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Neighborhood Rehab: Green Valley - Arroyo Grande BlvdCity of Henderson

735

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

175C-FTI

Final Report

9/13/2016 JE-W4X589000316 0.00 1,062.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,062.000.00

10/5/2016 JE-W4X589000416 0.00 6,561.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,561.080.00

8/8/2017 JE-W4X589000617 0.00 2,765.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,765.000.00

10/10/2017 JE-W4X589000717 0.00 57,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,965.000.00

11/7/2017 JE-W4X589000917 0.00 9,688.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,688.000.00

11/7/2017 JE-W4X589000817 0.00 15,980.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,980.000.00

12/19/2017 JE-W4X589001017 0.00 58,746.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,746.250.00

2/6/2018 JE-W4X589001117 0.00 37,766.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,766.740.00

3/14/2018 JE-W4X589001217 0.00 69,737.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 69,737.110.00

4/25/2018 JE-W4X589010318 0.00 3,378.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,378.000.00

5/30/2018 JE-W4X589000418 0.00 4,433.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,433.660.00

6/13/2018 JE-W4X589000518 0.00 1,710.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,710.000.00

7/25/2018 JE-W4X589000618 0.00 4,733.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,733.000.00

9/12/2018 JE-W4X589000718 0.00 183.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183.000.00

10/3/2018 JE-W4X589000818 0.00 5,422.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,422.000.00

12/27/2018 JE-W4X589001118 0.00 2,729.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,729.000.00

TTL 0.00 381,759.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 381,759.190.00

LAS VEGAS PAVING CORP

1/23/2018 1-175C-FTI 31,766.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,766.340.00

4/25/2018 2-175C-FTI 48,202.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,202.610.00

6/27/2018 3-175C-FTI 582,013.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 582,013.600.00

7/18/2018 5-175C-FTI 305,033.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 305,033.480.00

7/25/2018 4-175C-FTI 289,331.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289,331.200.00

10/17/2018 6-175C-FTI 1,952,620.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,952,620.870.00

10/31/2018 7-175C-FTI 35,948.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,948.000.00

11/21/2018 7-175C-FTI 337,272.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 337,272.390.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 5 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Neighborhood Rehab: Green Valley - Arroyo Grande BlvdCity of Henderson

735

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

175C-FTI

Final Report

12/12/2018 9-175C-FTI 665,851.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 665,851.450.00

12/19/2018 10-175C-FTI 297,460.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297,460.490.00

2/6/2019 11-175C-FTI 431,050.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 431,050.280.00

3/13/2019 12-175C-FTI 230,836.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 230,836.420.00

4/24/2019 13-175C-FTI 51,347.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,347.020.00

7/17/2019 14-175C-FTI 150,467.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,467.220.00

12/11/2019 15-175C-FTI 291,859.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 291,859.840.00

TTL 5,701,061.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,701,061.210.00

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

9/19/2017 UPRR-03047-21 9,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,300.000.00

6/27/2018 UPRR - 03047-21E 1,005.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,005.000.00

6/27/2018 UPRR - 469 - 58E 1,005.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,005.000.00

6/27/2018 UPRR - 03047 - 21X 5,055.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,055.000.00

TTL 16,365.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,365.000.00

WELLS CARGO, INC.

5/5/2015 1-175C-FTI 110,008.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,008.100.00

5/19/2015 2-175C-FTI 19,790.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,790.880.00

7/20/2015 3-175C-FTI 15,397.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,397.600.00

7/20/2015 4-175C-FTI 52,664.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,664.600.00

2/2/2016 5-175C-FTI 5,206.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,206.870.00

4/26/2016 6-175C-FTI 5,206.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,206.870.00

TTL 208,274.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 208,274.920.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 6 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Neighborhood Rehab: Green Valley - Arroyo Grande BlvdCity of Henderson

735

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

175C-FTI

Final Report

6,166,520.86 876,521.85 341.08 0.00 2,245.52 7,045,629.31Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

6,451,000.00 1,020,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 7,471,000.00

284,479.14 143,478.15 -341.08 0.00 -2,245.52 425,370.690.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 7 of 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 176A-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 176A-FTI; DOWNTOWN HENDERSON COMPLETE STREETS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance176A-FTI 8,517,418.60$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 741 3,482,581.40$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Henderson available resources.

6896

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Downtown Henderson Complete StreetsCity of Henderson

741

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

176A-FTI

Final Report

AEROTECH MAPPING

8/4/2015 ATM-0115-019 0.00 18,765.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,765.000.00

8/4/2015 ATM-0415-094 0.00 4,795.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,795.000.00

5/30/2017 AREO-00150191 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,500.000.00

TTL 0.00 27,060.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,060.000.00

ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS

3/28/2017 ARC-9080656 0.00 581.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 581.910.00

TTL 0.00 581.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 581.910.00

CA GROUP

7/22/2014 176A-FTICAG-1 0.00 27,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,200.000.00

7/22/2014 176A-FTICAG-2 0.00 17,025.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,025.000.00

7/31/2014 CAG-3 0.00 19,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,400.000.00

1/13/2015 CAG-5176A-FTI 0.00 10,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,250.000.00

1/13/2015 CAG-4176A-FTI 0.00 26,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,000.000.00

8/4/2015 CAG-6 0.00 5,125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,125.000.00

8/4/2015 CAG-7 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.000.00

7/26/2016 CAG-2-176A-FTI 0.00 131,648.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 131,648.500.00

7/26/2016 CAG-3-176A-FTI 0.00 87,700.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 87,700.500.00

8/9/2016 CAG-1-176A-FTI 0.00 176,747.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 176,747.500.00

12/22/2016 CAG-6 (CM-17) 0.00 53,960.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 53,960.500.00

1/24/2017 CAG-4-176A-FTI 0.00 49,018.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,018.000.00

1/24/2017 CAG-5-176A-FTI 0.00 70,794.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 70,794.500.00

7/3/2017 176A-FTI-CAG-9 0.00 3,361.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,361.900.00

7/3/2017 176A-FTI-CAG-10 0.00 1,985.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,985.400.00

7/3/2017 176A-FTI-CA7 0.00 10,668.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,668.700.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Downtown Henderson Complete StreetsCity of Henderson

741

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

176A-FTI

Final Report

7/3/2017 176A-FTI-CAG-8 0.00 3,044.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,044.500.00

10/3/2018 CAG-11 0.00 5,368.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,368.000.00

TTL 0.00 719,298.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 719,298.000.00

FIRST CHOICE TREE SERVICE

1/16/2018 FC-44289 450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 450.000.00

TTL 450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 450.000.00

HENDERSON, CITY OF

7/10/2014 MSC-5020688 0.00 7,117.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,117.850.00

7/30/2014 MSC-5020781 0.00 1,928.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,928.410.00

8/4/2014 MSC-5020866 0.00 1,922.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,922.770.00

10/13/2014 MSC-5021234 0.00 1,987.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,987.930.00

12/8/2014 MSC-5021486 0.00 453.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 453.040.00

12/8/2014 MSC-5021552 0.00 3,739.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,739.780.00

12/8/2014 MSC-5021604 0.00 5,015.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,015.350.00

3/24/2015 MSC-5022177 0.00 3,343.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,343.920.00

3/24/2015 MSC-5022261 0.00 2,240.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,240.990.00

4/7/2015 MSC-5022217 0.00 2,585.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,585.430.00

4/28/2015 MSC-5022411 0.00 99.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.280.00

6/9/2015 MSC-5022652 0.00 2,859.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,859.940.00

6/18/2015 MSC-5022699 0.00 4,616.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,616.520.00

7/16/2015 MSC-5022910 0.00 4,468.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,468.560.00

8/25/2015 MSC-5023120 0.00 3,704.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,704.140.00

10/27/2015 MSC-5023534 0.00 1,614.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,614.690.00

10/27/2015 MSC-5023571 0.00 5,366.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,366.950.00

12/8/2015 MSC-5023837 0.00 5,288.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,288.290.00

12/22/2015 MSC-5023958 0.00 5,216.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,216.440.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Downtown Henderson Complete StreetsCity of Henderson

741

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

176A-FTI

Final Report

1/19/2016 MSC-5024112 0.00 4,466.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,466.970.00

3/22/2016 MSC-5024432 0.00 2,257.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,257.750.00

3/22/2016 MSC-5024470 0.00 3,482.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,482.070.00

6/7/2016 MSC-5024981 0.00 1,025.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,025.170.00

6/7/2016 MSC-5024923 0.00 4,596.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,596.720.00

6/14/2016 MSC-5025025 0.00 5,605.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,605.650.00

8/2/2016 MSC-5025331 0.00 8,361.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,361.060.00

8/30/2016 MSC-5025142 0.00 15,559.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,559.140.00

9/13/2016 MSC-5025597 0.00 3,304.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,304.180.00

10/11/2016 MSC-5025776 0.00 8,009.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,009.130.00

11/15/2016 MSC-5025961 0.00 3,454.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,454.950.00

11/29/2016 MSC-5026204 0.00 4,598.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,598.700.00

1/17/2017 MSC-5026377 0.00 6,055.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,055.800.00

1/31/2017 MSC-5026497 0.00 8,692.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,692.860.00

3/7/2017 MSC-5026682 0.00 11,098.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,098.420.00

3/21/2017 COH-1968 24,778.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,778.000.00

4/4/2017 MSC-5026845 0.00 1,914.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,914.890.00

5/8/2017 MSC-5027028 0.00 9,283.28 0.00 0.00 244.49 9,527.770.00

5/30/2017 MSC-5027171 0.00 24,080.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,080.490.00

7/10/2017 MSC-5027352 0.00 35,920.51 0.00 0.00 483.40 36,403.910.00

8/2/2017 MSC-5027500 0.00 22,526.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,526.570.00

9/11/2017 MSC-5027737 0.00 24,518.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,518.040.00

10/18/2017 MSC-5027938 0.00 36,308.34 0.00 0.00 638.22 36,946.560.00

11/14/2017 MSC-5028125 0.00 27,044.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,044.330.00

12/5/2017 MSC-5028221 0.00 23,659.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,659.420.00

1/9/2018 MSC-5028389 0.00 18,059.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,059.390.00

1/30/2018 MSC-5028559 20,688.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,688.400.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Downtown Henderson Complete StreetsCity of Henderson

741

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

176A-FTI

Final Report

3/14/2018 MSC-5028814 0.00 19,087.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,087.230.00

4/4/2018 MSC-5028962 0.00 19,455.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,455.360.00

5/2/2018 `MSC-5029111 0.00 18,646.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,646.770.00

5/30/2018 MSC-5029322 17,045.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,111.13 18,156.230.00

6/27/2018 MSC-5029466 14,539.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,539.400.00

8/1/2018 MSC-5029722 0.00 3,610.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,610.410.00

9/12/2018 MSC-5029882 735.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 735.700.00

10/10/2018 MSC-5030111 641.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 641.440.00

12/12/2018 MSC-5030406 1,880.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,880.680.00

12/19/2018 COH-00104514 0.00 12,477.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,477.000.00

1/24/2019 MSC-5030586 21,756.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,756.370.00

3/20/2019 MSC-5030779 5,776.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,776.890.00

3/27/2019 MSC-5030933 0.00 5,430.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,430.360.00

5/30/2019 MSC-5031190 2,456.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,456.470.00

7/31/2019 MSC-5031625 469.17 922.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,391.940.00

8/7/2019 MSC-5031706 1,831.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,831.830.00

9/25/2019 MSC-5031980 1,126.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,126.110.00

11/6/2019 MSC-5032157 0.00 816.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 816.650.00

12/4/2019 MSC-5032334 0.00 2,592.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,592.770.00

TTL 113,725.56 460,493.43 0.00 0.00 2,477.24 576,696.230.00

KCI TECHNOLOGIES

1/23/2018 KCI-583472 0.00 0.00 6,445.30 0.00 0.00 6,445.300.00

TTL 0.00 0.00 6,445.30 0.00 0.00 6,445.300.00

LAS VEGAS PAVING CORP

7/26/2016 LVP-1-176A-FTI 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.000.00

6/13/2017 1-176A-FTI 212,426.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 212,426.940.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 4 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Downtown Henderson Complete StreetsCity of Henderson

741

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

176A-FTI

Final Report

6/20/2017 2-176A-FTI 402,803.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 402,803.130.00

7/10/2017 LVP-58399CM 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.000.00

7/24/2017 3-176A-FTI 432,135.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 432,135.730.00

9/11/2017 4-176A-FTI 627,094.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 627,094.840.00

10/24/2017 5-176A-FTI 724,668.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 724,668.420.00

11/21/2017 6-176A-FTI 604,265.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 604,265.520.00

12/12/2017 7-176A-FTI 484,835.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 484,835.420.00

1/9/2018 8-176A-FTI 343,690.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 343,690.990.00

2/6/2018 9-176A-FTI 912,280.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912,280.990.00

3/14/2018 10-176A-FTI 359,578.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 359,578.390.00

4/11/2018 11-176A-FTI 640,168.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 640,168.420.00

5/30/2018 12-176A-FTI 548,692.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 548,692.550.00

7/3/2018 13-176A-FTI 171,389.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 171,389.990.00

7/25/2018 14-176A-FTI 331,813.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 331,813.770.00

10/10/2018 15-176A-FTI 131,216.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 131,216.820.00

5/8/2019 16-176A-FTI 62,772.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62,772.150.00

TTL 7,089,834.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,089,834.070.00

NINYO & MOORE

5/16/2018 NM-216576 450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 450.000.00

TTL 450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 450.000.00

NV ENGERGY

12/19/2017 NVE-47820 48,799.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,799.000.00

TTL 48,799.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,799.000.00

NV ENGERY

8/2/2017 NVE-44216 29,452.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,452.000.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 5 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Downtown Henderson Complete StreetsCity of Henderson

741

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

176A-FTI

Final Report

TTL 29,452.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,452.000.00

TAB CONTRACTORS, INC.

9/11/2019 1-176A-FTI 4,165.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,165.820.00

10/16/2019 2-176A-FTI 11,610.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,610.130.00

12/4/2019 3-176A-FTI 2,576.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,576.140.00

TTL 18,352.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,352.090.00

7,301,062.72 1,207,433.34 6,445.30 0.00 2,477.24 8,517,418.60Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

10,200,000.00 1,800,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 12,000,000.00

2,898,937.28 592,566.66 -6,445.30 0.00 -2,477.24 3,482,581.400.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 6 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 177A-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT 177A-FTI; INTERSTATE 11, US-95 TO HOOVER DAM BRIDGE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance177A-FTI 54,322,388.42$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 1049 $0.00

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada available resources.

6900

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

4LEAF CONSULTING, INC

6/30/2015 J0122-04-JE833 283,749.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 283,749.490.00

6/30/2015 J0122-01-JE833 63,752.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63,752.430.00

6/30/2015 J0122-02-JE833 192,000.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 192,000.430.00

6/30/2015 J0122-03-JE833 253,431.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 253,431.980.00

3/2/2016 J0122-12 385,845.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 385,845.500.00

4/20/2016 J0122-14 344,401.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 344,401.750.00

5/25/2016 J0122-15 454,674.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 454,674.750.00

6/15/2016 J0122-16 369,831.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 369,831.250.00

6/30/2016 J0122-17 432,256.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 432,256.500.00

8/17/2016 J0122-18 363,816.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 363,816.500.00

9/14/2016 JO122-19 366,210.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 366,210.000.00

11/9/2016 J0122-20 451,835.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 451,835.250.00

11/16/2016 J0122-21 394,224.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 394,224.250.00

12/12/2016 J0122-22 403,968.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 403,968.920.00

1/11/2017 J0122-23 400,936.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,936.600.00

2/15/2017 J0122-24 495,701.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 495,701.770.00

3/15/2017 J0122-25 430,042.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 430,042.160.00

4/19/2017 J0122-26 567,950.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 567,950.540.00

5/24/2017 J0122-27 447,490.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 447,490.700.00

6/14/2017 J0122-28 450,606.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 450,606.500.00

7/26/2017 J0122-29A 319,004.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 319,004.770.00

8/30/2017 J0122-29B 167,485.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 167,485.440.00

8/30/2017 J0122-30 374,967.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 374,967.530.00

9/14/2017 J0122-31 400,913.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,913.630.00

10/25/2017 J0122-32 468,115.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 468,115.280.00

11/15/2017 J0122-33 368,126.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 368,126.870.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 1 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

12/13/2017 J0122-34 325,317.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,317.420.00

1/17/2018 J0122-35 372,855.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 372,855.270.00

2/14/2018 J0122-36 270,591.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270,591.850.00

3/14/2018 J0122-37 255,323.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255,323.430.00

4/18/2018 J0122-38 287,022.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 287,022.870.00

5/23/2018 J0122-39 236,623.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 236,623.200.00

6/13/2018 J0122-40 255,962.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255,962.250.00

7/18/2018 J0122-41 261,174.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 261,174.380.00

8/31/2018 JO122-42 219,426.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 219,426.790.00

8/31/2018 JO122-43 184,194.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 184,194.250.00

9/30/2018 JO122-44 112,437.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112,437.500.00

10/31/2018 JO122-45 118,117.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 118,117.750.00

12/19/2018 J0122-46 147,113.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147,113.750.00

1/16/2019 J0122-47 79,647.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,647.500.00

2/13/2019 J0122-48 28,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,965.000.00

3/13/2019 J0122-49 30,830.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,830.000.00

4/3/2019 J0122-50 22,560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,560.000.00

TTL 12,859,504.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,859,504.000.00

4LEAF CONSULTING, INC.

3/19/2015 J0122-01 3,355.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,355.390.00

4/8/2015 J0122-02 10,105.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,105.290.00

5/9/2015 J0122-03 13,338.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,338.530.00

6/24/2015 J0122-04 14,934.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,934.180.00

7/22/2015 J0122-05 241,102.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 241,102.500.00

8/24/2015 J0122-06 285,621.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 285,621.750.00

9/17/2015 J0122-07 292,357.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 292,357.750.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 2 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

10/15/2015 J0122-08 281,568.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 281,568.250.00

11/19/2015 J0122-09rev 400,177.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,177.000.00

12/17/2015 J0122-10 282,434.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 282,434.500.00

1/7/2016 J0122-11 297,528.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297,528.000.00

3/23/2016 J0122-13 338,777.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 338,777.750.00

TTL 2,461,300.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,461,300.890.00

AMES CONSTRUCTION

2/18/2015 1 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350,000.000.00

TTL 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350,000.000.00

BOULDER CITY, CITY OF

3/2/2015 BC LD/MF 145,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145,250.000.00

TTL 145,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145,250.000.00

COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION OF NEVADA

6/10/2014 PDG04072014RDR-1 17,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,500.000.00

7/7/2014 PDG06122014RDR-1 181,516.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 181,516.980.00

11/19/2014 PDG111814RDR-1 42,356.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,356.850.00

1/26/2015 PDG01222015RDR 34,817.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,817.000.00

2/5/2015 PDG02052015RDR 57,231.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,231.340.00

3/23/2015 PDG03192015RDR 193,860.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 193,860.240.00

4/13/2015 PDG04092015RDR 1,262,316.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,262,316.160.00

5/6/2015 PDG05052015RDR 842,821.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 842,821.320.00

6/10/2015 PDG06042015RDR 1,828,960.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,828,960.620.00

8/24/2015 PDG07302015RDR 1,250,207.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,250,207.290.00

11/23/2019 9725230 -42,835.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -42,835.410.00

TTL 5,668,752.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,668,752.390.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 3 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

JACOBS ENGINEERING

2/5/2014 PMC-02-CP FY14 23,751.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,751.490.00

2/24/2014 PMC-03-CP FY14 24,201.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,201.570.00

3/17/2014 PMC-04-CP FY14 21,574.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,574.020.00

4/17/2014 PMC-05-CP FY14 58,248.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,248.070.00

7/1/2014 PMC-06-CP FY14 22,165.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,165.740.00

7/24/2014 PMC-07-CP FY14 112,338.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112,338.030.00

12/22/2014 PMC-01CP 144,096.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 144,096.710.00

2/2/2015 PMC-02CP 29,478.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,478.500.00

2/24/2015 PMC-03CP 30,287.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,287.810.00

3/23/2015 PMC-01BCB 620.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 620.010.00

3/24/2015 PMC-04CP 25,709.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,709.960.00

5/21/2015 PMC-02BCB 3,617.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,617.230.00

5/27/2015 PMC-03BCB 2,811.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,811.610.00

7/22/2015 PMC-04BCB 7,350.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,350.200.00

7/22/2015 PMC-07CP 16,201.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,201.810.00

10/7/2015 PMC-01BCBP 4,438.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,438.310.00

11/25/2015 PMC-02BCBP 2,997.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,997.780.00

12/9/2015 PMC-03BCBP 2,144.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,144.240.00

1/6/2016 PMC-04BCBP-16 2,017.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,017.730.00

2/10/2016 PMC-05BCBP-16 2,714.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,714.300.00

3/23/2016 PMC-06BCBP-16 2,493.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,493.960.00

4/27/2016 PMC-07BCBP-16 2,696.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,696.220.00

5/25/2016 PMC-08BCBP-16 3,400.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,400.440.00

6/30/2016 PMC-10BCBP-16 2,297.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,297.400.00

7/13/2016 PMC-09BCBP-16 2,595.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,595.220.00

7/21/2016 PMC-11BCBP-16 2,691.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,691.260.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 4 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

10/5/2016 PMC-01BCBP-16 5,345.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,345.170.00

12/21/2016 PMC-01BCBP-017 216,783.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 216,783.930.00

2/8/2017 PMC-02BCBP-017 35,868.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,868.380.00

3/8/2017 PMC-03BCBP-017 58,730.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,730.290.00

3/29/2017 PMC-04BCBP-017 70,969.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70,969.150.00

5/24/2017 PMC-05BCBP-017 254,157.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 254,157.990.00

7/12/2017 PMC-06BCBP-017 89,563.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89,563.630.00

8/16/2017 PMC-07BCBP-017 53,042.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53,042.310.00

9/27/2017 PMC-01BCBP-018 164,082.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 164,082.070.00

10/18/2017 PMC-02BCBP-018 99,857.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99,857.600.00

12/13/2017 PMC-03BCBP-018 145,745.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145,745.660.00

1/31/2018 PMC-04BCBP-018 93,130.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93,130.380.00

2/14/2018 PMC-05BCBP-018 77,617.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77,617.680.00

3/21/2018 PMC-06BCBP-018 77,569.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77,569.590.00

4/18/2018 PMC-07BCBP-018 98,280.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,280.220.00

5/24/2018 PMC-08BCBP-018 75,803.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75,803.170.00

6/20/2018 PMC-09BCBP-018 74,229.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74,229.630.00

7/25/2018 PMC-10BCBP-018 78,303.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78,303.380.00

9/12/2018 PMC-01SS-19 92,319.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92,319.990.00

9/30/2018 PMC-02SS-19 35,622.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,622.080.00

11/21/2018 PMC-03SS-19 43,227.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,227.920.00

12/19/2018 PMC-04SS-19 45,937.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45,937.500.00

1/24/2019 PMC-05SS-19 32,434.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,434.240.00

2/13/2019 PMC-06SS-19 38,453.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,453.870.00

3/20/2019 PMC-07SS-19 982.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 982.590.00

TTL 2,610,998.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,610,998.040.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 5 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

LAS VEGAS PAVING

3/5/2015 1 213,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 213,750.000.00

4/8/2015 2 118,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 118,750.000.00

5/6/2015 3 95,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95,000.000.00

6/11/2015 4 452,726.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 452,726.610.00

7/16/2015 5 143,630.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143,630.740.00

8/24/2015 6 145,699.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145,699.730.00

9/17/2015 7 206,462.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 206,462.540.00

10/15/2015 8 648,748.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 648,748.170.00

11/19/2015 9 281,356.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 281,356.760.00

12/17/2015 10 414,690.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 414,690.940.00

1/25/2016 11 362,384.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 362,384.860.00

TTL 3,083,200.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,083,200.350.00

LAS VEGAS PAVING CORP

1/20/2016 18 183,720.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183,720.650.00

3/9/2016 12 496,648.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 496,648.270.00

4/6/2016 13 495,987.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 495,987.840.00

5/25/2016 15 201,794.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 201,794.480.00

6/30/2016 JE Batch #1202 -183,720.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -183,720.650.00

7/27/2016 14 470,024.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 470,024.500.00

8/31/2016 19 341,235.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 341,235.250.00

9/14/2016 20 340,846.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 340,846.840.00

10/5/2016 16 379,093.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 379,093.840.00

10/26/2016 21 275,864.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 275,864.090.00

10/26/2016 17 285,642.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 285,642.240.00

11/23/2016 22 413,599.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 413,599.310.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 6 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

12/28/2016 23 213,541.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 213,541.480.00

1/25/2017 24 180,578.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180,578.000.00

2/22/2017 25 445,060.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 445,060.800.00

3/22/2017 26 270,052.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270,052.460.00

4/26/2017 27 289,033.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289,033.080.00

5/4/2017 28 210,520.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 210,520.000.00

5/24/2017 29 60,704.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,704.050.00

6/7/2017 JE Batch #1379 -60,704.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -60,704.050.00

6/21/2017 30 269,936.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 269,936.970.00

7/26/2017 31 480,415.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 480,415.000.00

8/30/2017 32 246,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 246,700.000.00

9/20/2017 33 249,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 249,800.000.00

10/25/2017 34 302,830.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 302,830.000.00

11/29/2017 35 294,488.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 294,488.490.00

12/20/2017 36 116,288.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116,288.170.00

1/31/2018 37 84,165.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,165.040.00

2/21/2018 38 157,305.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 157,305.430.00

3/19/2018 Change Order #17 1,255,017.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,255,017.730.00

3/19/2018 Change Order #19 1,409,223.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,409,223.420.00

3/21/2018 39 223,962.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 223,962.200.00

4/18/2018 40 177,491.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177,491.270.00

5/31/2018 41 322,593.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 322,593.860.00

6/20/2018 42 109,569.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 109,569.220.00

6/21/2018 Change Order #19 782,901.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 782,901.900.00

6/21/2018 Change Order #19 469,741.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 469,741.140.00

6/21/2018 Change Order #19 469,741.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 469,741.140.00

6/21/2018 Change Order #17 2,091,221.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,091,221.200.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 7 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

6/21/2018 Change Order #17 836,678.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 836,678.480.00

7/25/2018 43 32,523.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,523.010.00

8/21/2018 44/14-001A 142,795.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142,795.300.00

8/31/2018 45/14-011A 46,922.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,922.980.00

9/30/2018 46/14-011A 64,182.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,182.720.00

11/28/2018 47 194,078.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 194,078.920.00

12/19/2018 48/14-011A 9,245.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,245.930.00

3/6/2019 49/14-001A 49,999.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,999.990.00

6/10/2019 Change Order #17 475.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 475.000.00

TTL 16,199,816.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,199,816.990.00

LOUIS BERGER

10/31/2013 1A 96,172.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96,172.100.00

11/25/2013 2A 247,757.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247,757.750.00

11/25/2013 CCB1141-0016 274,103.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 274,103.230.00

11/30/2013 3A 244,346.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244,346.130.00

12/30/2013 CCB1141-0017 309,426.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309,426.690.00

1/6/2014 4A 347,445.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 347,445.290.00

1/21/2014 4B 120,423.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,423.750.00

1/28/2014 CCB1141-0018 589,050.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 589,050.410.00

2/20/2014 5A 478,243.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 478,243.650.00

2/28/2014 CCB1141-0019 551,330.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 551,330.880.00

3/31/2014 CCB1141-0020 135,979.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 135,979.300.00

4/21/2014 CCB1141-0021 530,160.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 530,160.170.00

5/20/2014 43873 189,724.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 189,724.870.00

6/14/2014 46560 297,241.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297,241.550.00

8/21/2014 CCB1141-0024 275,944.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 275,944.390.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 8 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

9/4/2014 CCB1141-0025 229,527.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 229,527.770.00

9/22/2014 CCB1141-0026 166,757.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166,757.270.00

10/16/2014 CCB1141-0027 251,591.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 251,591.410.00

11/12/2014 CCB1141-0028 297,831.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297,831.900.00

12/22/2014 CCB1141-0029 79,210.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,210.290.00

1/20/2015 CCB1141-0030 79,082.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,082.250.00

2/24/2015 CCB1141-0031 36,402.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,402.520.00

3/9/2015 CCB1141-0032 74,120.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74,120.960.00

4/8/2015 CCB1141-0033 11,089.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,089.640.00

4/15/2015 74529 6,263.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,263.580.00

4/20/2015 CCB1141-0035 4,335.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,335.820.00

5/9/2015 CCB1141-0037 17,116.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,116.110.00

6/11/2015 77888 17,731.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,731.450.00

6/17/2015 CCB1141-0039 1,312.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,312.640.00

6/22/2015 79667 14,102.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,102.730.00

7/13/2015 CCB1141-0041 309.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309.120.00

7/22/2015 81910 16,005.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,005.160.00

8/31/2015 83964 15,339.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,339.680.00

10/12/2015 86852 17,158.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,158.460.00

10/12/2015 86856 1,319.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,319.560.00

10/22/2015 87469 13,328.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,328.970.00

12/9/2015 89477 20,746.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,746.050.00

12/17/2015 90622 12,001.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,001.960.00

3/1/2016 97873 8,345.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,345.940.00

4/6/2016 99088 10,731.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,731.500.00

4/6/2016 97310 14,351.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,351.910.00

5/11/2016 100803 15,583.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,583.760.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 9 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

5/25/2016 102193 8,646.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,646.230.00

6/22/2016 103727 6,014.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,014.430.00

7/21/2016 2000622.53 12,579.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,579.160.00

8/24/2016 109674A 721.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 721.480.00

8/31/2016 111278 8,593.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,593.110.00

9/28/2016 113310 9,009.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,009.570.00

11/16/2016 119350 8,389.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,389.400.00

11/23/2016 119708 7,088.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,088.930.00

1/11/2017 129605 7,060.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,060.090.00

2/8/2017 131722 9,625.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,625.510.00

3/1/2017 133460R 9,377.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,377.610.00

3/22/2017 138131 6,122.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,122.740.00

4/26/2017 140375 11,027.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,027.600.00

6/1/2017 145211 7,415.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,415.300.00

6/28/2017 147376 7,276.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,276.750.00

7/26/2017 153340 7,739.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,739.320.00

8/20/2017 155194R 1,165.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,165.010.00

8/30/2017 155534 6,350.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,350.090.00

10/18/2017 158578 6,401.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,401.030.00

12/6/2017 163805 8,873.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,873.980.00

12/6/2017 162455 4,829.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,829.150.00

1/31/2018 171406 5,572.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,572.030.00

3/7/2018 173218 7,528.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,528.840.00

3/14/2018 172777 4,629.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,629.470.00

4/4/2018 174913 4,969.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,969.810.00

5/2/2018 177127 9,247.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,247.800.00

5/30/2018 178980 5,512.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,512.790.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 10 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

7/3/2018 181237 4,262.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,262.000.00

7/3/2018 183271 5,159.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,159.980.00

8/31/2018 186689 3,947.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,947.990.00

9/30/2018 191064 3,446.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,446.360.00

12/12/2018 193848 2,160.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,160.900.00

1/16/2019 195671 470.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 470.120.00

2/6/2019 197255 935.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 935.550.00

3/13/2019 199498 865.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 865.030.00

4/3/2019 201439 1,994.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,994.980.00

12/5/2019 192904 1,176.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,176.090.00

TTL 6,335,234.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,335,234.800.00

NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE

7/15/2015 84320-2014-F 102,846.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102,846.000.00

TTL 102,846.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102,846.000.00

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

7/7/2014 1 0.00 8,319.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,319.130.00

1/8/2015 #2 0.00 97,306.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 97,306.550.00

1/8/2015 #3 0.00 16,694.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,694.860.00

4/8/2015 #4 0.00 6,847.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,847.960.00

7/2/2015 #5 0.00 20,787.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,787.610.00

1/12/2016 #6 0.00 58,261.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,261.170.00

4/20/2016 7 0.00 20,590.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,590.180.00

7/13/2016 #8 0.00 79,184.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,184.550.00

11/30/2016 9 0.00 65,771.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,771.280.00

1/25/2017 10 0.00 25,441.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,441.740.00

4/19/2017 #11 0.00 49,128.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,128.570.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 11 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

7/19/2017 90550004 0.00 91,756.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 91,756.140.00

10/11/2017 90567151 0.00 12,395.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,395.940.00

1/17/2018 9059962 0.00 79,046.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,046.110.00

6/27/2018 90623819 0.00 104,703.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 104,703.100.00

9/24/2018 90667175 0.00 21,331.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,331.620.00

2/14/2019 90700638 0.00 84,612.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,612.730.00

4/11/2019 90700638A 0.00 130,220.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 130,220.760.00

TTL 0.00 972,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 972,400.000.00

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

8/24/2015 73320J2502 477,573.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 477,573.000.00

TTL 477,573.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 477,573.000.00

SKANSKA USA CIVIL WEST CAD

2/12/2015 63896 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350,000.000.00

TTL 350,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350,000.000.00

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

1/15/2014 7590001524 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.000.00

7/27/2015 7600526062 2,564.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,564.110.00

TTL 17,564.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,564.110.00

STATE OF NV, DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION

11/30/2015 73320J2501 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.000.00

7/7/2016 73320J2501 -10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10,000,000.000.00

TTL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00

WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION

10/17/2013 13-DSR-12437A 1,177,093.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,177,093.920.00

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 12 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Interstate 11, US-95 to Hoover Dam BridgeRegional Transportation Commission

1049

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

177A-FTI

Final Report

1/21/2014 13-DSR-12437B 1,153,909.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,153,909.200.00

7/30/2014 13-DSR-12437-1 750,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750,000.000.00

1/27/2020 13-DSR-12437 -393,055.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -393,055.270.00

TTL 2,687,947.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,687,947.850.00

53,349,988.42 972,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54,322,388.42Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

54,322,388.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 54,322,388.42

972,400.00 -972,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Wednesday, February 12, 2020 Page 13 of 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 179A-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 179A-FTI; 6TH STREET, BRIDGER AVENUE TO STEWART AVENUE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance179A-FTI 4,833,882.02$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 785 3,216,117.98$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Las Vegas available resources.

6887

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

6th St: Bridger Ave/Stewart AveCity of Las Vegas

785

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

179A-FTI

Final Report

LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

7/31/2014 174386 0.00 2,694.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,694.280.00

9/23/2014 175389 0.00 1,154.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,154.490.00

10/6/2014 175681 0.00 10,549.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,549.740.00

11/4/2014 176724 0.00 28,018.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,018.350.00

12/8/2014 177595 0.00 27,372.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,372.460.00

1/6/2015 178817 0.00 18,862.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,862.330.00

2/10/2015 180759 0.00 51,260.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,260.350.00

4/7/2015 183638 0.00 8,525.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,525.820.00

5/5/2015 186417 0.00 3,508.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,508.130.00

6/18/2015 188857 0.00 8,004.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,004.520.00

7/14/2015 189987 0.00 1,946.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,946.560.00

7/28/2015 191817 0.00 10,579.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,579.590.00

7/28/2015 192583 0.00 2,536.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,536.480.00

9/8/2015 195205 0.00 2,305.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,305.750.00

10/13/2015 196064 0.00 11,158.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,158.960.00

11/17/2015 197817 0.00 15,906.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,906.830.00

12/22/2015 199637 0.00 24,081.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,081.460.00

12/29/2015 201497 0.00 14,635.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,635.430.00

2/22/2016 205778 0.00 5,616.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,616.830.00

3/15/2016 207337 0.00 6,348.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,348.470.00

5/3/2016 211537 0.00 6,271.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,271.590.00

6/7/2016 212960 0.00 2,485.08 0.00 0.00 2,874.12 5,359.200.00

6/7/2016 214659 0.00 9,097.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,097.220.00

7/5/2016 217617 0.00 4,626.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,626.150.00

8/16/2016 219858 0.00 29,793.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,793.340.00

8/30/2016 220768 0.00 6,101.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,101.600.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

6th St: Bridger Ave/Stewart AveCity of Las Vegas

785

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

179A-FTI

Final Report

10/18/2016 222439 0.00 3,937.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,937.570.00

11/15/2016 223486 0.00 6,187.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,187.990.00

12/20/2016 224820 0.00 3,327.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,327.760.00

1/3/2017 225308 0.00 9,711.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,711.430.00

2/7/2017 225824 0.00 2,065.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,065.440.00

3/7/2017 226719 0.00 8,369.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,369.720.00

3/28/2017 227212 0.00 30,529.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,529.140.00

4/25/2017 227866 0.00 2,487.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,487.870.00

6/20/2017 229357 0.00 8,642.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,642.400.00

6/27/2017 228316 0.00 7,597.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,597.550.00

8/8/2017 233777 0.00 2,279.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,279.700.00

8/29/2017 236717 0.00 3,165.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,165.840.00

9/13/2017 237337 0.00 582.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 582.320.00

10/18/2017 240518 0.00 13,249.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,249.890.00

12/5/2017 243918 0.00 2,491.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,491.480.00

12/12/2017 244857 0.00 16,480.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,480.740.00

1/2/2018 247797 0.00 12,718.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,718.340.00

1/23/2018 232117 0.00 1,829.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,829.590.00

1/30/2018 250947 0.00 3,369.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,369.800.00

3/14/2018 252066 0.00 2,064.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,064.440.00

3/21/2018 252837 0.00 8,125.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,125.180.00

4/25/2018 256337 0.00 17,016.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,016.410.00

5/30/2018 257724 0.00 12,963.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,963.100.00

6/27/2018 258385 0.00 2,889.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,889.450.00

8/8/2018 261717 0.00 98,958.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,958.010.00

11/14/2018 271739 0.00 2,143.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,143.940.00

11/28/2018 269197 0.00 14,295.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,295.120.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

6th St: Bridger Ave/Stewart AveCity of Las Vegas

785

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

179A-FTI

Final Report

12/12/2018 266037 0.00 17,100.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,100.100.00

12/19/2018 272657 0.00 33,920.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,920.770.00

1/24/2019 274240 897.96 10,513.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,411.880.00

1/30/2019 275597 7,721.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,721.890.00

2/27/2019 276709 9,280.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,280.790.00

3/27/2019 278037 11,144.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,144.480.00

4/24/2019 279338 13,770.73 3,348.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,119.190.00

5/22/2019 281365 231,259.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 231,259.340.00

6/26/2019 283600 406,985.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 406,985.970.00

7/31/2019 286197 596,494.14 10,097.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 606,591.970.00

8/29/2019 291677 1,231.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,231.000.00

8/29/2019 290017 448,629.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448,629.010.00

8/29/2019 291097 13,595.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,595.670.00

9/5/2019 264917 0.00 2,984.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,984.290.00

9/25/2019 294597 17,062.42 1,345.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,408.350.00

10/23/2019 297417 778,533.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778,533.290.00

12/11/2019 300417 1,282,642.79 1,630.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,284,272.910.00

1/29/2020 306318 28,830.67 1,178.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,009.160.00

1/29/2020 305617 289,885.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289,885.810.00

TTL 4,137,965.96 693,041.94 0.00 0.00 2,874.12 4,833,882.020.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

6th St: Bridger Ave/Stewart AveCity of Las Vegas

785

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

179A-FTI

Final Report

4,137,965.96 693,041.94 0.00 0.00 2,874.12 4,833,882.02Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

7,234,000.00 806,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.000.00 8,050,000.00

3,096,034.04 112,958.06 0.00 0.00 7,125.88 3,216,117.980.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 183A-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 183A-FTI; VALLE VERDE DRIVE, HORIZON RIDGE PARKWAY TO WARM SPRINGS ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance183A-FTI 429,676.75$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 809 70,323.25$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Henderson available resources.

6897

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Valle Verde Dr: Horizon Ridge Pkwy/Warm Springs RdCity of Henderson

809

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

183A-FTI

Final Report

HENDERSON, CITY OF

12/8/2014 MSC-5021617 0.00 932.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 932.680.00

3/24/2015 MSC-5022275 0.00 843.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 843.300.00

4/7/2015 MSC-5022192 0.00 751.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 751.090.00

4/7/2015 MSC-5022231 0.00 806.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 806.430.00

4/28/2015 MSC-5022423 0.00 618.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 618.420.00

6/9/2015 MSC-5022666 0.00 1,078.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,078.300.00

6/18/2015 MSC-5022713 0.00 914.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 914.280.00

7/16/2015 MSC-5022923 0.00 1,504.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,504.980.00

8/25/2015 MSC-5023133 0.00 2,185.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,185.020.00

10/27/2015 MSC-5023546 0.00 1,377.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,377.400.00

10/27/2015 MSC-5023581 0.00 1,356.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,356.720.00

12/8/2015 MSC-5023849 0.00 2,151.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,151.580.00

12/22/2015 MSC-5023970 0.00 1,446.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,446.000.00

1/19/2016 MSC-5024121 0.00 986.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 986.320.00

3/22/2016 MSC-5024442 0.00 1,713.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,713.150.00

3/22/2016 MSC-5024480 0.00 1,532.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,532.810.00

6/7/2016 MSC-5024932 0.00 633.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 633.540.00

6/7/2016 MSC-5024991 0.00 3,040.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,040.690.00

6/14/2016 MSC-5025035 0.00 2,508.88 0.00 0.00 178.80 2,687.680.00

7/5/2016 MSC-5025152 0.00 1,554.79 0.00 0.00 149.00 1,703.790.00

7/26/2016 MSC-5025341 0.00 2,724.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,724.330.00

9/13/2016 MSC-5025588 0.00 1,614.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,614.510.00

10/11/2016 MSC-5025784 0.00 2,675.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,675.150.00

11/15/2016 MSC-5025954 0.00 1,312.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,312.680.00

11/29/2016 MSC-5026211 0.00 2,242.86 0.00 0.00 1,327.12 3,569.980.00

1/17/2017 MSC-5026384 0.00 1,045.25 0.00 0.00 1,326.38 2,371.630.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Valle Verde Dr: Horizon Ridge Pkwy/Warm Springs RdCity of Henderson

809

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

183A-FTI

Final Report

1/31/2017 MSC-5026505 0.00 1,299.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,299.900.00

3/7/2017 MSC-5026689 0.00 1,637.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,637.440.00

4/12/2017 MSC-5026851 0.00 1,893.33 0.00 0.00 157.31 2,050.640.00

5/8/2017 MSC-5027023 0.00 2,223.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,223.960.00

5/30/2017 MSC-5027176 0.00 1,208.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,208.670.00

7/10/2017 MSC-5027356 0.00 2,227.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,227.610.00

8/2/2017 MSC-5027504 0.00 1,623.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,623.830.00

9/11/2017 MSC-5027741 0.00 1,223.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,223.830.00

10/18/2017 MSC-5027942 0.00 2,699.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,699.910.00

11/14/2017 MSC-5028129 0.00 1,259.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,259.780.00

12/5/2017 MSC-5028224 0.00 1,388.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,388.130.00

1/9/2018 MSC-5028393 0.00 650.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 650.490.00

1/30/2018 MSC-5028562 0.00 493.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 493.580.00

9/12/2018 MSC-5029883 0.00 284.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 284.720.00

10/10/2018 MSC-5030112 0.00 2,915.02 0.00 920.55 0.00 3,835.570.00

11/21/2018 MSC-5030278 0.00 2,330.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,330.640.00

12/19/2018 MSC-5030407 0.00 7,163.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,163.280.00

1/24/2019 MSC-5030587 0.00 4,225.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,225.020.00

3/20/2019 MSC-5030780 0.00 1,352.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,352.290.00

TTL 0.00 77,652.59 0.00 920.55 3,138.61 81,711.750.00

HORROCKS ENGINEERS

1/13/2015 HE-35908 0.00 2,012.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,012.000.00

1/20/2015 HOR-36101 0.00 16,274.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,274.130.00

2/3/2015 HE-36424 0.00 36,618.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,618.750.00

3/24/2015 HE-36746 0.00 35,596.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,596.000.00

4/13/2015 HE-36870 0.00 33,925.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,925.000.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Valle Verde Dr: Horizon Ridge Pkwy/Warm Springs RdCity of Henderson

809

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

183A-FTI

Final Report

6/18/2015 HE-37123 0.00 20,328.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,328.000.00

8/4/2015 HE-37326 0.00 11,102.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,102.000.00

8/4/2015 HE-37707 0.00 3,505.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,505.000.00

9/14/2015 HE-38140 0.00 220.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.340.00

10/20/2015 HE-38431 0.00 309.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309.000.00

12/1/2015 HE-38621 0.00 3,490.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,490.000.00

1/5/2016 HE-38939 0.00 3,799.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,799.000.00

3/8/2016 HE-39220 0.00 19,454.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,454.000.00

4/5/2016 HE-39523 0.00 738.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 738.000.00

4/5/2016 HE-39731 0.00 358.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 358.000.00

5/17/2016 HE-39943 0.00 270.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270.000.00

6/7/2016 HE-40123 0.00 1,630.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,630.000.00

6/7/2016 HE-39063 0.00 6,282.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,282.750.00

7/19/2016 HE-40378 0.00 8,035.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,035.000.00

8/2/2016 HE-40568 0.00 1,838.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,838.250.00

9/13/2016 HE-40778 0.00 1,112.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,112.500.00

2/7/2017 HE-41308 0.00 3,227.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,227.280.00

9/5/2018 HE-47944 0.00 38,575.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,575.000.00

1/24/2019 HE-49555 0.00 29,685.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,685.000.00

7/24/2019 HE-51851 0.00 69,580.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69,580.000.00

TTL 0.00 347,965.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 347,965.000.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Valle Verde Dr: Horizon Ridge Pkwy/Warm Springs RdCity of Henderson

809

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

183A-FTI

Final Report

0.00 425,617.59 0.00 920.55 3,138.61 429,676.75Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 500,000.00

0.00 74,382.41 0.00 -920.55 -3,138.61 70,323.250.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 187A-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT 187A-FTI; SHADOW LANE, ALTA DRIVE TO CHARLESTON BOULEVARD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance187A-FTI 585,950.27$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 846 449,049.73$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Las Vegas available resources.

6889

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Shadow Ln: Alta Dr/Charleston BlvdCity of Las Vegas

846

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

187A-FTI

Final Report

LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

6/18/2015 189457 0.00 3,819.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,819.000.00

7/28/2015 192397 0.00 15,290.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,290.310.00

8/6/2015 193237 0.00 16,881.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,881.000.00

9/8/2015 195210 0.00 107.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 107.020.00

12/29/2015 201557 0.00 58,248.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,248.040.00

2/22/2016 205877 0.00 1,433.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,433.000.00

5/17/2016 213077 0.00 643.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 643.000.00

8/30/2016 220772 0.00 10,334.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,334.560.00

1/3/2017 225305 0.00 7,273.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,273.570.00

3/28/2017 227216 0.00 8,963.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,963.790.00

4/25/2017 227870 0.00 656.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 656.480.00

6/27/2017 228338 0.00 437.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 437.660.00

6/27/2017 229457 0.00 1,648.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,648.930.00

8/15/2017 233877 0.00 4,683.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,683.660.00

8/29/2017 236797 0.00 3,435.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,435.240.00

9/11/2017 237377 0.00 33,091.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,091.260.00

10/18/2017 240718 0.00 863.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 863.660.00

12/5/2017 244157 0.00 4,685.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,685.410.00

12/5/2017 244957 0.00 3,208.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,208.850.00

1/2/2018 247877 0.00 5,398.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,398.610.00

1/23/2018 232197 0.00 36,423.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,423.730.00

1/30/2018 250956 0.00 5,301.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,301.290.00

3/7/2018 252070 0.00 4,338.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,338.970.00

3/21/2018 253137 0.00 2,761.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,761.810.00

4/25/2018 256217 0.00 5,667.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,667.900.00

5/30/2018 257719 0.00 3,660.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,660.670.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Shadow Ln: Alta Dr/Charleston BlvdCity of Las Vegas

846

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

187A-FTI

Final Report

7/3/2018 258380 0.00 3,135.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,135.220.00

8/1/2018 261617 0.00 10,681.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,681.610.00

8/29/2018 264397 0.00 3,635.31 0.00 0.00 78.37 3,713.680.00

10/3/2018 269297 0.00 1,899.68 0.00 0.00 461.63 2,361.310.00

11/14/2018 271744 0.00 3,033.11 0.00 0.00 246.87 3,279.980.00

11/28/2018 267277 0.00 28,260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,260.000.00

12/12/2018 272577 0.00 2,906.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,906.800.00

1/24/2019 274201 0.00 2,372.86 0.00 0.00 740.67 3,113.530.00

1/30/2019 275563 0.00 4,278.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,278.870.00

2/27/2019 276644 0.00 1,482.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,482.320.00

3/27/2019 278041 0.00 1,590.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,590.790.00

4/24/2019 279679 0.00 1,567.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,567.350.00

5/30/2019 281199 0.00 1,927.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,927.640.00

6/26/2019 283479 0.00 1,415.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,415.820.00

7/31/2019 286897 0.00 140,619.14 0.00 0.00 3,341.82 143,960.960.00

8/29/2019 289597 0.00 25,260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,260.000.00

8/29/2019 291017 0.00 2,753.37 0.00 0.00 3,474.87 6,228.240.00

9/25/2019 294097 0.00 1,730.49 0.00 0.00 1,813.17 3,543.660.00

10/30/2019 296757 0.00 2,261.35 0.00 0.00 983.72 3,245.070.00

12/26/2019 299957 0.00 94,740.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94,740.000.00

TTL 0.00 574,809.15 0.00 0.00 11,141.12 585,950.270.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Shadow Ln: Alta Dr/Charleston BlvdCity of Las Vegas

846

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

187A-FTI

Final Report

0.00 574,809.15 0.00 0.00 11,141.12 585,950.27Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 1,025,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.000.00 1,035,000.00

0.00 450,190.85 0.00 0.00 -1,141.12 449,049.730.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 188B-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS PROJECT 188B-FTI; TROPICAL PARKWAY, HOLLYWOOD TO LINN LANE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance188B-FTI $ 6,297,872.43 Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 898 $ 477,127.57

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of North Las Vegas available resources.

6892

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Tropical Pkwy/Hollywood Blvd: Linn Ln to I-15City of North Las Vegas

898

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

188B-FTI

Final Report

NORTH LAS VEGAS, CITY OF

5/3/2016 7319 0.00 1,233.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,233.310.00

5/24/2016 7363 0.00 1,079.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,079.960.00

7/5/2016 7481 0.00 1,790.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,790.820.00

8/2/2016 7558 0.00 219.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.880.00

8/2/2016 7615 0.00 23,768.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,768.250.00

8/23/2016 7661 0.00 2,759.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,759.080.00

10/5/2016 7731 0.00 1,360.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,360.440.00

10/25/2016 7784 0.00 95,971.18 0.00 0.00 154.96 96,126.140.00

11/29/2016 7844 0.00 3,059.12 0.00 0.00 708.67 3,767.790.00

1/10/2017 7898 0.00 52,082.69 0.00 0.00 1,431.42 53,514.110.00

1/31/2017 7947 0.00 2,725.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,725.330.00

3/7/2017 7996 0.00 1,078.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,078.020.00

4/4/2017 8051 0.00 419.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 419.760.00

4/18/2017 8087 0.00 15,112.88 0.00 0.00 111.87 15,224.750.00

5/16/2017 8163 0.00 6,964.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,964.620.00

6/20/2017 8224 0.00 19,663.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,663.110.00

7/24/2017 8302 0.00 48,740.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,740.960.00

8/2/2017 8352-A 0.00 51,175.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,175.000.00

8/2/2017 8352-B 0.00 658.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 658.810.00

9/11/2017 8398 0.00 23,315.38 0.00 0.00 1,467.82 24,783.200.00

9/26/2017 8450 0.00 33,152.63 0.00 0.00 1,129.80 34,282.430.00

10/24/2017 8509 0.00 76,148.95 0.00 0.00 2,262.36 78,411.310.00

11/21/2017 8548 0.00 13,807.75 0.00 0.00 4,114.33 17,922.080.00

1/2/2018 8621 0.00 19,765.84 0.00 0.00 3,553.11 23,318.950.00

1/30/2018 8668 0.00 6,639.85 0.00 0.00 1,383.35 8,023.200.00

3/14/2018 8717 0.00 24,295.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,295.070.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 1 of 3

Tropical Pkwy/Hollywood Blvd: Linn Ln to I-15City of North Las Vegas

898

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

188B-FTI

Final Report

4/4/2018 8760 0.00 68,887.98 0.00 0.00 3,622.89 72,510.870.00

5/2/2018 8817 0.00 3,519.13 0.00 0.00 4,241.15 7,760.280.00

5/30/2018 8903 0.00 89,311.47 0.00 0.00 3,302.49 92,613.960.00

7/3/2018 8963 0.00 14,465.07 0.00 0.00 302.23 14,767.300.00

8/15/2018 9073A 142,357.00 4,223.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 146,580.960.00

9/5/2018 9118 0.00 10,382.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,382.700.00

10/3/2018 9162 281,639.56 9,168.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 290,808.210.00

10/10/2018 9073B 0.00 2,656.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,656.070.00

10/31/2018 9213 0.00 24,566.66 0.00 0.00 59.81 24,626.470.00

12/12/2018 9246 102,333.27 9,099.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 111,433.160.00

1/16/2019 9288 447,650.32 39,356.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 487,007.060.00

3/20/2019 9377 772,947.90 6,627.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 779,575.730.00

4/24/2019 9416 591,941.67 4,931.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 596,873.330.00

7/3/2019 9564 386,494.83 2,646.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 389,141.070.00

7/24/2019 9468 257,767.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 257,767.070.00

7/31/2019 9634 763,877.09 2,264.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 766,141.550.00

8/21/2019 9707 226,517.52 8,816.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 235,334.410.00

10/2/2019 9759 86,761.22 4,059.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 90,821.100.00

10/30/2019 9797 684,269.07 38,092.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 722,361.080.00

12/4/2019 9850 0.00 11,013.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,013.350.00

2/5/2020 9983 0.00 2,793.94 3.00 0.00 0.00 2,796.940.00

2/12/2020 10004 0.00 9,351.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,351.270.00

2/19/2020 9907 612,250.86 19,991.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 632,242.110.00

TTL 5,356,807.38 913,215.79 3.00 0.00 27,846.26 6,297,872.430.00

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 2 of 3

Tropical Pkwy/Hollywood Blvd: Linn Ln to I-15City of North Las Vegas

898

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

188B-FTI

Final Report

5,356,807.38 913,215.79 3.00 0.00 27,846.26 6,297,872.43Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

5,645,000.00 1,100,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.000.00 6,775,000.00

288,192.62 186,784.21 -3.00 0.00 2,153.74 477,127.570.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5557F20D-6BAA-4BCA-8630-453601F86957

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering Consent

tde

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT: 192B-FTI PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE THE FINAL REPORT FOR CITY OF HENDERSON PROJECT 192B-FTI; SUNRIDGE HEIGHTS PARKWAY, EXECUTIVE AIRPORT DRIVE TO BERMUDA ROAD (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

Project Number Final Expenses Funding Source Contract Balance192B-FTI 147,515.56$ Fuel Revenue Indexing Funds 978 152,484.44$

BACKGROUND:

When a project is completed and no additional reimbursements are anticipated, a final report on the project is prepared. Upon approval, no further charges against the project can be reimbursed. Any project funds remaining in the contract will be returned to City of Henderson available resources.

6898

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Sunridge Heights Pkwy; Executive Airport Dr to Bermuda RdCity of Henderson

978

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

192B-FTI

Final Report

ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS

7/31/2019 ARC-10278912 0.00 62.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.890.00

TTL 0.00 62.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.890.00

HENDERSON, CITY OF

3/27/2019 MSC-5030935 0.00 1,138.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,138.880.00

5/30/2019 MSC-5031192 0.00 4,413.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,413.070.00

6/26/2019 MSC-5031015 0.00 4,270.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,270.690.00

7/17/2019 MSC-5031409 0.00 4,400.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,400.460.00

7/31/2019 MSC-5031627 0.00 4,272.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,272.290.00

8/7/2019 MSC-5031708 0.00 1,565.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,565.850.00

9/25/2019 MSC-5031982 0.00 3,374.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,374.980.00

11/6/2019 MSC-5032159 0.00 14,175.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,175.410.00

12/4/2019 MSC-5032336 0.00 17,998.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,998.580.00

12/18/2019 MSC-5032383 0.00 8,966.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,966.460.00

TTL 0.00 64,576.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,576.670.00

T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.

9/25/2019 TYL-101908172 0.00 20,764.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,764.500.00

10/23/2019 TYL-101909096 0.00 14,542.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,542.500.00

11/30/2019 TYL-101912219 0.00 2,133.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,133.000.00

12/4/2019 TYL-101911178 0.00 20,436.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,436.000.00

TTL 0.00 57,876.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,876.000.00

WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

3/20/2019 SHG-19020983 0.00 10,552.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,552.000.00

6/19/2019 SHG-19050630 0.00 955.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 955.200.00

6/19/2019 SHG-19042120 0.00 11,439.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,439.800.00

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 1 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

Sunridge Heights Pkwy; Executive Airport Dr to Bermuda RdCity of Henderson

978

Invoice Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other AmountDatabase

192B-FTI

Final Report

7/24/2019 SHG-19060604 0.00 2,053.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,053.000.00

TTL 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.000.00

0.00 147,515.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 147,515.56Project Totals 0.00

Encumbered

Balance

0.00 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 300,000.00

0.00 152,484.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 152,484.440.00

Approval:

Construction Engineering Staking Aquisition R/W-Other TotalDatabase

Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Page 2 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 8FF3983E-2117-4BED-A149-2C1EFB9F47B3

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: PROJECT FINANCIAL AND STATUS REPORTS PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT THE MONTHLY ENTITY PROJECT FINANCIAL AND STATUS REPORTS HAVE BEEN POSTED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA WEBSITE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

None

BACKGROUND:

The Direct Distribution balances and the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax and Question 10 financial reports have been posted to the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada website. The following monthly status reports are also available on the website:

Clark County City of Las Vegas City of North Las Vegas City of Henderson City of Boulder City City of Mesquite

http://www.rtcsnv.com/planning-engineering/streets-highways/

Nevada Department of Transportation project information available at http://www.nevadadot.com/projects/

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________ JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering

ssa Consent

4192

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0553388F-9295-4845-8661-D2C04BE0F037

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: CAPITAL PROJECT TRACKING AND PROJECT ACTIVITY STATUS REPORTS PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT THE MONTHLY CAPITAL PROJECT TRACKING REPORT AND THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM PROJECT ACTIVITY STATUS REPORT HAVE BEEN POSTED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA WEBSITE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action BACKGROUND: Two reports are prepared each month to document the progress made on the various tasks and studies currently underway by the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC). The Capital Project Tracking Report identifies capital projects under development by the RTC. The Project Activity Status Report identifies current planning studies as outlined in the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). Since member entities may be involved in these activities, the RTC Board of Commissioners is notified when these reports are available on the agency’s website. Both the Capital Project Tracking Report and the UPWP Project Activity Status Report have been posted to the Transportation Planning page of the RTC website, located at: http://www.rtcsnv.com/planning-engineering/transportation-planning/ Respectfully submitted, CRAIG RABORN Director of Metropolitan Planning Organization

cr Consent

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0CE11596-B636-4D84-9FB3-E8D16A6E01F2

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: 2017-2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT CLARK 20-01 PETITIONER: M. J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AMENDMENT CLARK 20-01 TO THE 2017-2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND AIR QUALITY BY MANAGING CONGESTION

FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action BACKGROUND:

The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Board of Commissioners (RTC Board) adopted the 2017-2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) at the RTC Board’s February 9, 2017 meeting. Federal regulations require the RTP to be amended when there are major adjustments to program elements. Amendment Clark 20-01 will add a federally funded transit project to the RTP. Project details are attached. This amendment is consistent with the 2017-2040 Regional Transportation Plan and does not impact air quality conformity. Staff recommends approval. Respectfully submitted, CRAIG RABORN Director of Metropolitan Planning Organization mf Non-Consent

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0CE11596-B636-4D84-9FB3-E8D16A6E01F2

Regional Transportation Commission

AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT REPORT

Agenda Item Recommendation (as submitted):

THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA APPROVE AMENDMENT CLARK 20-01 TO THE 2017-2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION)

Agenda Item Requested by: Regional Transportation Commission Date: 02/11/2020 Staff Discussion: The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Board of Commissioners (RTC Board) adopted the 2017-2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) at the RTC Board’s February 9, 2017 meeting. Federal regulations require the RTP to be amended when there are major adjustments to program elements. The following federally funded transit project is added to the RTP to promote awareness about human trafficking in Southern Nevada. Project details are attached. Clark 20-01:

Add RTP Project # 6278: Human Trafficking in Public Transit Awareness Campaign, Awareness Campaign - regarding human trafficking in public transit. Includes, but not limited to, operator, security and employee training in recognizing the signs of human trafficking, safely reporting and transporting identified human trafficking victims to safe havens. Includes campaign elements highlighting information positioned throughout the transit system. Also includes performance matrix measuring the success of the awareness campaign. This amendment is consistent with the 2017-2040 Regional Transportation Plan and does not impact air quality conformity. Staff recommends approval. Advisory Action: Approval Disapproval Hold Item Meeting Date: 02/27/2020 Executive Advisory Committee

Discussion:

Advisory Action: Approval Disapproval Hold Item

* Conditions (if applicable)

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019-2022Amendment 19TIP(20-01) RTCSNV

1 Projects Listed

(Ver 1) 19TIP(20-01)CL20200040 STATUS New Project FEDERALTitle: Human Trafficking in Public Transit Awareness Campaign

Description: Awareness Campaign - regarding human trafficking in public transit. Includes, but not limited to, operator, security and employee training in recognizing

the signs of human trafficking, safely reporting and transporting identified human trafficking victims to safe havens. Includes campaign elements

highlighting information positioned throughout the transit system. Also includes performance matrix measuring the success of the awareness campaign.Project Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Exempt, Other - Non construction related activities. NDOT: District 1TCM:NoTransit - Other

Various LocationsLimits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2020 Public Transportation Innovation Program (49 USC 5312) $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000

2020 RTC Sales Tax $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000

2020-2024 TOTAL $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000

MPO RTC Southern NevadaLead Agency RTCSNV (6278)

RTCSNV Project Listing

Printed on Tuesday, February 11, 2020Page 1 of 1

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: 2017-2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT CLARK 19-27 PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE EXECUTIVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON AMENDMENT CLARK 19-27 TO THE 2017-2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND AIR QUALITY BY MANAGING CONGESTION

FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action BACKGROUND: The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Board of Commissioners (RTC Board) adopted the 2017-2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) at the RTC Board’s February 9, 2017 meeting. Federal regulations require the RTP to be amended when there are major adjustments to program elements. RTP Amendment Clark 19-27 adds regionally significant projects sponsored by the Nevada Department of Transportation and local entities. A 30-day public review and comment period has been scheduled to occur from February 10, 2020 to March 11, 2020, with the meeting of the Executive Advisory Committee on February 27, 2020 serving as the public meeting for which a public notice is disseminated. A public notice has been posted regarding the comment period and details of Amendment Clark 19-27 made available on the RTC website. The RTC has coordinated with the Environmental Protection Agency to perform transportation and air quality modeling and the conformity determination is included in the agenda backup. RTC staff anticipates the RTC Board of Commissioners will take action on RTP Amendment Clark 19- 27 at the Commissioners’ April 9, 2020 meeting. Respectfully submitted, ___________________________ CRAIG RABORN Director of Metropolitan Planning Organization ak Non-Consent

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0CE11596-B636-4D84-9FB3-E8D16A6E01F2

RTP Amendment 19-27

Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Access 2040 Amendment 19-27

Project List

TIP IDLOCAL

IDTITLE PROJECT TYPE FUNDING TOTAL COST MODELED

LISTED in

RTPNETWORK DESCRIPTION

RTP/TIP

YEAR

PROJECT

OPENING YEAR

HORIZON

YEAR

CL20190055 N/A I-15 Northbound Truck Climbing Lane Road Improvement FEDERAL, STATE $8,000,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Outside Network 2022 N/A N/A

CL20190056 N/A I-15 Northbound Truck Climbing Lane

Sandhill Road

Road Improvement FEDERAL, STATE $6,000,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Outside Network 2021 N/A N/A

CL20190060 N/A I 15 North of Logandale/Overton

Interchange mill and extending Truck

parking spaced

3R (Rehabilitation) FEDERAL, STATE $42,660,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Exempt and Outside

Network

2020 2023 2020

CL20190061 N/A I 15, Expend to 256 Truck Parking Spaces

at MP 96 Package 2

Other FEDERAL, STATE $4,730,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Exempt and Outside

Network

2022 N/A N/A

CL20180049 N/A Downtown Access Project Road Expansion (NEPA) FEDERAL, STATE $100,000,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Exempt 2024 N/A N/A

Cl20180050 N/A Downtown Access Project Road Expansion FEDERAL, STATE $900,000,000 Yes Yes Regionally Significant Modeled 2027 2031 2040

CL20160086 N/A US 95 NW PHASE 3D, MP 88 AND CC215

FROM GRAND MONTECITO TO TENAYA,

MP CL 37-39 AND US 95 AT LONE

MOUNTAIN MP CL 89.43

Road/Interchange/Intersecti

on Improvement

FEDERAL, STATE $169,000,000 Yes Yes Regionally Significant Modeled 2020 2023 2030

CL20180070 N/A I 515, CLARK COUNTY, AT EASTERN

AVENUE AND DESERT INN ROAD; US 95,

CLARK COUNTY, MP CL 69.00 TO MP CL

74.00

Replace bridge structures

(Safety)

FEDERAL, STATE $14,650,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Exempt 2021 N/A N/A

TIP IDLOCAL

IDTITLE PROJECT TYPE FUNDING TOTAL COST MODELED

LISTED in

RTPNETWORK DESCRIPTION

RTP/TIP

YEAR

PROJECT

OPENING YEAR

HORIZON

YEAR

N/A N/A Rancho Drive - Sahara to Mesquite Complete Street project -

No Capacity Change

Local $9,650,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Exempt 2024 N/A N/A

N/A N/A Charleston Complete Street - Rancho to

MLK

Add bicycle lanes and widen

sidewalks. No Capacity

Change

Local $31,850,000 No Yes Regionally Significant Exempt 2024 N/A N/A

TIP IDLOCAL

IDTITLE PROJECT TYPE FUNDING TOTAL COST MODELED

LISTED in

RTPNETWORK DESCRIPTION

RTP/TIP

YEAR

PROJECT

OPENING YEAR

HORIZON

YEAR

N/A N/A North 5th St. - Cheyenne to Lone

Mountain

Widen from 4 to 6 lanes Local $11,500,000 Yes Yes Regionally Significant Modeled 2027 2028 2030

TIP IDLOCAL

IDTITLE PROJECT TYPE FUNDING TOTAL COST MODELED

LISTED in

RTPNETWORK DESCRIPTION

RTP/TIP

YEAR

PROJECT

OPENING YEAR

HORIZON

YEAR

N/A N/A Rainbow Blvd. Saw tooth Completion Local $11,360,000 Yes Yes Regionally Significant Modeled 2028 2030 2030

NDOT

LAS VEGAS

NORTH LAS VEGAS

CLARK COUNTY

Page 1 of 1 12/30/2019

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019-2022Amendment 19-27 RTCSNV

6 Projects Listed

(Ver 1) 19-27CL20180070 STATUS New Project FEDERALTitle: I 515, CLARK COUNTY, AT EASTERN AVENUE AND DESERT INN ROAD; US 95, CLARK COUNTY, MP CL 69.00 TO MP CL 74.00

Description: REPLACE STRUCTURES, H-1450 AND I-1440, ON-SYSTEM BRIDGES

Project Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Exempt, Safety - Non capacity widening or bridge reconstruction. NDOT: District 1TCM:YesBridge - New/replace

Bridge #: I-1440Limits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2020 State Gas Tax $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $600,000

2021 Competative Highway Bridge Program $0 $0 $13,300,000 $0 $13,300,000

2021 State Gas Tax $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $700,000

<2019 Prior $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000

2019-2023 TOTAL $0 $14,000,000 $0 $600,000 $14,600,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $0 $650,000 $0 $14,000,000 $14,650,000

MPO Nevada DOTLead Agency RTCSNV (6273)

(Ver 1) 19-27CL20190061 STATUS New Project STATETitle: I 15, 256 Truck Parking Spaces at MP 96 Package 2

Description: Expand Truck Parking Spaces

Project Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Non-Exempt NDOT: District 1TCM:NoOther Misc.

Nearest Crossstreet: MP 96 -0.12 Miles East North of Kern River PipelineLimits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2022 State Gas Tax $0 $0 $4,730,000 $0 $4,730,000

2019-2023 TOTAL $0 $4,730,000 $0 $0 $4,730,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $4,730,000 $4,730,000

MPO Nevada DOTLead Agency RTCSNV (6269)

RTCSNV Project Listing

Printed on Wednesday, February 5, 2020Page 1 of 5

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019-2022Amendment 19-27 RTCSNV

6 Projects Listed

(Ver 1) 19-27CL20190055 STATUS New Project FEDERALTitle: I-15 Northbound Truck Climbing Lane

Description: Truck Climbing Lane

Project Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Exempt, Safety - Truck climbing lanes. NDOT: District 1TCM:NoRd Improvement

From 4.28 Miles West of US 93 to 0.23 Miles South of Dry Lake of Distance (mile) 1.2 Milepost begins at 68.5 ends at 69.7Limits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2022 HWY Freight $0 $0 $7,600,000 $0 $7,600,000

2022 State Match - Nv $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $400,000

2019-2023 TOTAL $0 $8,000,000 $0 $0 $8,000,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000

MPO Nevada DOTLead Agency RTCSNV (6266)

(Ver 1) 19-27CL20190056 STATUS New Project FEDERALTitle: I-15 Northbound Truck Climbing Lane Sandhill Road

Description: Truck Climbing Lane

Project Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Exempt, Safety - Truck climbing lanes. NDOT: District 1TCM:NoRd Improvement

From 0.24 Miles North of Sandhill Blvd to NV/AR Stateline of Distance (mile) 1 Milepost begins at 122.7 ends at 123.7Limits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2021 HWY Freight $0 $0 $5,700,000 $0 $5,700,000

2021 State Match - Nv $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000

2019-2023 TOTAL $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000

MPO Nevada DOTLead Agency RTCSNV (6267)

RTCSNV Project Listing

Printed on Wednesday, February 5, 2020Page 2 of 5

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019-2022Amendment 19-27 RTCSNV

6 Projects Listed

(Ver 3) 19-27CL20160086 STATUS In Progress - Programmed FEDERALTitle: US 95 NW PHASE 3D, MP 88 AND CC215 FROM GRAND MONTECITO TO TENAYA, MP CL 37-39 AND US 95 AT LONE MOUNTAIN MP CL 89.43

Description: CONST W215/N95, S95/W215, E215/N95; WIDEN N95/E215 TO 2 LNS; CONST 215 SKY PT INTG W SLIP RAMPS; EXTD SKY PT FM

CENTENNIAL-AZURE; REALIGN/WIDEN/CONNECT OSO BLANCA-CENTENNIAL; CONST 215 TO 6 LN FRWY; CONST MUP FM TENAYA-GRAND

MONTECITO. WIDEN LONE MOUNTAIN GRADE SEPProject Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Non-Exempt NDOT: District 1TCM:YesRd Interchange/ Intersection

Primary Interchange: US 95, Secondary Interchange: CC 215Limits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2020 Hghwy Infra Statewide $0 $0 $9,000,000 $0 $9,000,000

2020 Local Fund $0 $0 $1,894,736 $0 $1,894,736

2020 NDOT Bond FRI2 $0 $0 $60,000,000 $0 $60,000,000

2020 NHPP $0 $0 $60,907,825 $0 $60,907,825

2020 NHPP Exempt $0 $0 $8,550,000 $0 $8,550,000

2020 STBG State-Wide AC $0 $0 $22,692,175 $0 $22,692,175

2020 State Match - Nv $0 $0 $5,955,264 $0 $5,955,264

2019-2023 TOTAL $0 $169,000,000 $0 $0 $169,000,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $169,000,000 $169,000,000

MPO Nevada DOTLead Agency RTCSNV (6225)

RTCSNV Project Listing

Printed on Wednesday, February 5, 2020Page 3 of 5

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019-2022Amendment 19-16 RTCSNV

6 Projects Listed

Previously Approved Version

CL20160086 (Ver 2) 19-16

Title: US 95 Construct Ramps (North West Corridor Package 3D/E)

Description: Construct ramps, realigh/widen, and upgrade CC 215 to divided 6 lane freeway

Project Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Non-Exempt NDOT: District 1TCM:YesRd Interchange/ Intersection

Primary Interchange: US 95, Secondary Interchange: CC 215Limits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2020 Local Fund $0 $0 $12,000,000 $0 $12,000,000

2020 NDOT Bond FRI2 $0 $0 $60,000,000 $0 $60,000,000

2020 NHPP $0 $0 $60,907,825 $0 $60,907,825

2020 STBG State-Wide $0 $0 $22,692,175 $0 $22,692,175

2020 State Match - Nv $0 $0 $4,400,000 $0 $4,400,000

2019-2023 TOTAL $0 $160,000,000 $0 $0 $160,000,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $160,000,000 $160,000,000

MPO Nevada DOTLead Agency RTCSNV (6225)

RTCSNV Project Listing

Printed on Wednesday, February 5, 2020Page 4 of 5

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019-2022Amendment 19-27 RTCSNV

6 Projects Listed

(Ver 1) 19-27CL20190060 STATUS New Project FEDERALTitle: I 15, CLARK COUNTY, IN MESQUITE FROM 1.877 MI NORTH OF THE LOGANDALE/OVERTON INTERCHANGE TO 0.342 MI NORTH OF LOWER FLAT

Description: 2 INCH COLDMILL, 3 INCH PLANTMIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE WITH OPEN GRADE; EXPAND TRUCK PARKING AREAS AT MP 96 AND 110

Project Type:

ClarkCounty:

AQ: Non-Exempt NDOT: District 1TCM:NoRd Recons/Rehab/Resurf

From 1.88 Miles North of the Logandale/Overton interchange to 0.342 Miles North of lower Flat Top Drive of Distance (mile)

22.67 Milepost begins at 95.78 ends at 118.45

Limits:

OTHERCONROWPERevenue SourceFED FY TOTAL

2019 State Gas Tax $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $160,000

2020 HWY Freight $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000

2020 HWY Freight AC $0 $0 $3,740,000 $0 $3,740,000

2020 State Gas Tax $0 $0 $37,931,579 $0 $37,931,579

2020 State Match - Nv $0 $0 $228,421 $0 $228,421

2019-2023 TOTAL $0 $42,500,000 $0 $160,000 $42,660,000

ALL YEARS TOTAL $0 $160,000 $0 $42,500,000 $42,660,000

MPO Nevada DOTLead Agency RTCSNV (6268)

RTCSNV Project Listing

Printed on Wednesday, February 5, 2020Page 5 of 5

2/5/2020 Project Report

https://estip.nevadadot.com/fed_type_pj_list.asp?mtip_version=22-00&project_id=1029700&version=1&isrtppj=True 1/1

Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2040 - Amendment 19-27 1 Projects Listed

State TIP ID CL20200002 MPO/TIP RTCSNV 21TIP(22-00) Local ID 6275 Total Cost $31,850,000Lead Agency City of Las Vegas Contact fred solis 702-229-5409 NDOT District 1 County CLARKProject Type Rd Improvement Air Quality Exempt TCM NoProject Name Charleston BlvdProject Limits At Charleston Blvd From Rancho Dr To Martin Luther King BlvdDescription Complete Street Improvements

Fund Source Prior FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Future TotalRTC Fuel Tax - RTCSNV - - - $31,850,000 - - - $31,850,000

Total Programmed - - - $31,850,000 - - - $31,850,000

Version History

TIP Document MPOApproval

StateApproval

FHWAApproval

FTAApproval

22-00 Adoption 2022-2026 Pending Pending Pending N/A

Current Change Reason

SCHEDULE / FUNDING / SCOPE - New Project

Map data ©2020 GoogleReport a map error

2/5/2020 Project Report

https://estip.nevadadot.com/fed_type_pj_list.asp?mtip_version=22-00&project_id=1022523&version=1&isrtppj=True 1/1

Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2040 - Amendment 19-27 1 Projects Listed

State TIP ID CL20180050 MPO/TIP RTCSNV 21TIP(22-00) Local ID 6271 Total Cost $900,000,000Lead Agency Nevada DOT Contact Ryan Wheeler (702)671-8876 NDOT District 1 County CLARKProject Type Rd Expansion Air Quality Non-Exempt TCM YesProject Name I-515/ US-95 from US-95 Ranch Blvd to Mojave RD I-515; Mileposts US95 76.75 to I-515 72.77(Downtown Access Project )Project Limits At From Rancho Drive To Mojave Road of Distance (mile) 3.98 Begin: 72.77 End: 76.75Description Construct braided ramps between I-15 and I-515, construct HOV interchanges at City Parkway and Maryland Parkway, add HOV lanes from MLK to Eastern, add freeway capacity to I-515

Fund Source Prior FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Future TotalState Gas Tax - - - - - - $900,000,000 $900,000,000

Total Programmed - - - - - - $900,000,000 $900,000,000

Version History

TIP Document MPOApproval

StateApproval

FHWAApproval

FTAApproval

22-00 Adoption 2022-2026 Pending Pending Pending N/A

Current Change Reason

SCHEDULE / FUNDING / SCOPE - New Project

Map data ©2020Report a map error

2/5/2020 Project Report

https://estip.nevadadot.com/fed_type_pj_list.asp?mtip_version=22-00&project_id=1022522&version=1&isrtppj=True 1/1

Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2040 - Amendment 19-27 1 Projects Listed

State TIP ID CL20180049 MPO/TIP RTCSNV 21TIP(22-00) Local ID 6270 Total Cost $100,000,000Lead Agency Nevada DOT Contact Ryan Wheeler (702)671-8876 NDOT District 1 County CLARKProject Type Rd Expansion Air Quality Non-Exempt TCM YesProject Name I-515/ US-95 from US-95 Ranch Blvd to Mojave RD I-515; Mileposts US95 76.75 to I-515 72.77 Package 1 NEPA(Downtown Access Project NEPA)Project Limits At From Rancho Drive To Mojave Road of Distance (mile) 3.98 Begin: 72.77 End: 76.75Description Construct braided ramps between I-15 and I-515, construct HOV interchanges at City Parkway and Maryland Parkway, add HOV lanes from MLK to Eastern, add freeway capacity to I-515

Fund Source Prior FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Future TotalState Gas Tax - - - $100,000,000 - - - $100,000,000

Total Programmed - - - $100,000,000 - - - $100,000,000

Version History

TIP Document MPOApproval

StateApproval

FHWAApproval

FTAApproval

22-00 Adoption 2022-2026 Pending Pending Pending N/A

Current Change Reason

SCHEDULE / FUNDING / SCOPE - New Project

Map data ©2020Report a map error

2/5/2020 Project Report

https://estip.nevadadot.com/fed_type_pj_list.asp?mtip_version=22-00&project_id=1029720&version=1&isrtppj=True 1/1

Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2040 - Amendment 19-27 1 Projects Listed

State TIP ID CL20200003 MPO/TIP RTCSNV 21TIP(22-00) Local ID 6276 Total Cost $11,500,000Lead Agency City of North Las Vegas Contact Tom Brady 702-633-1227 NDOT District 1 County CLARKProject Type Rd Expansion Air Quality Non-Exempt TCM NoProject Name North 5th StreetProject Limits At North 5th Street From Cheyenne Av To Lone Mountain RoadDescription Widen from 4 to 6 lanes

Fund Source Prior FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Future TotalRTC Fuel Tax - RTCSNV - - - - - $11,500,000 - $11,500,000

Total Programmed - - - - - $11,500,000 - $11,500,000

Version History

TIP Document MPOApproval

StateApproval

FHWAApproval

FTAApproval

22-00 Adoption 2022-2026 Pending Pending Pending N/A

Current Change Reason

SCHEDULE / FUNDING / SCOPE - New Project

Map data ©2020Report a map error

2/5/2020 Project Report

https://estip.nevadadot.com/fed_type_pj_list.asp?mtip_version=22-00&project_id=1029740&version=1&isrtppj=True 1/1

Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2040 - Amendment 19-27 1 Projects Listed

State TIP ID CL20200004 MPO/TIP RTCSNV 21TIP(22-00) Local ID 6277 Total Cost $11,360,000Lead Agency Clark County Contact Tammi Tiger (702)455-2762 NDOT District 1 County CLARKProject Type Rd Improvement Air Quality Non-Exempt TCM NoProject Name Rainbow BlvdProject Limits At Rainbow Blvd From Blue Diamond To CC-215 of Distance (mile) 4Description Sawtooth Completion

Fund Source Prior FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Future TotalRTC Fuel Tax - RTCSNV - - - - - $11,360,000 - $11,360,000

Total Programmed - - - - - $11,360,000 - $11,360,000

Version History

TIP Document MPOApproval

StateApproval

FHWAApproval

FTAApproval

22-00 Adoption 2022-2026 Pending Pending Pending N/A

Current Change Reason

SCHEDULE / FUNDING / SCOPE - New Project

Map data ©2020Report a map error

2/5/2020 Project Report

https://estip.nevadadot.com/fed_type_pj_list.asp?mtip_version=22-00&project_id=1029680&version=1&isrtppj=True 1/1

Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2040 - Amendment 19-27 1 Projects Listed

State TIP ID CL20200001 MPO/TIP RTCSNV 21TIP(22-00) Local ID 6274 Total Cost $9,650,000Lead Agency City of Las Vegas Contact fred solis 702-229-5409 NDOT District 1 County CLARKProject Type Rd Improvement Air Quality Exempt TCM NoProject Name Rancho DriveProject Limits At Rancho Drive From Sahara Av To West Mesquite Av of Distance (mile) 6.1Description Complete street project

Fund Source Prior FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Future TotalRTC Fuel Tax - RTCSNV - - - $9,650,000 - - - $9,650,000

Total Programmed - - - $9,650,000 - - - $9,650,000

Version History

TIP Document MPOApproval

StateApproval

FHWAApproval

FTAApproval

22-00 Adoption 2022-2026 Pending Pending Pending N/A

Current Change Reason

SCHEDULE / FUNDING / SCOPE - New Project

Map data ©2020Report a map error

Air Quality Conformity Technical Report for 2017-2040 RTP/TIP Amendment3

This RTP amendment includes seven NDOT projects and a few locally funded regionally significant projects. A project list was sent to Air Quality Working Group as a part of Consultation process and the list is included in the next section of this document. Travel demand model is used to produce VMT estimates that are used as input to the air emission model MOVES to evaluate the air emissions for the Conformity Determination for this amendment. Except the projects added to the travel demand model for this RTP amendment, all other planning assumptions, including model versions, model horizon years, land use, and assumptions/ input to the travel demand model and MOVES model remain unchanged from those used in the last RTP amendment approved in 2019. The air emission budgets used for the Determination for this amendment also remain unchanged from those used in the last amendment. For easy reference and comparison with the original RTP and previous RTP Amendments, this document uses the same section titles, section numbers and table numbers as those in the original technical document for 2017-2040 RTP http://www.rtcsnv.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Appendix_E_Model_Technical_Report.pdf and those in the 2017 -2040 RTP Amendment –Clark -19-03, https://www.rtcsnv.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018-RTP-Amendment-Clark-19-03-BACKUP V2.pdf. Travel demand model has been run for RTP future horizon years 2020, 2030 and 2040. Air emission model MOVES is used and the analysis shows that the Conformity Determinations are met for all pollutes and for all future horizon years. The following sections present the details of the conformity. Conformity Determination For the RTP/TIP Amendment The table on the next page shows the project list sent to the Air Quality Working Group on December 10, 2019 for consultation. Some of these projects have been coded to the travel demand model networks for modeling. Some of the projects on the list are not coded in the model because they are exempt or outside the model network areas.

7. Emission Estimates

7.2 CO and PM10 Emissions Summary

RTC Travel Demand model (TDM) using TransCAD has been run to produce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for horizon years 2020, 2030 and 2040. Since year 2015 is a history and there have been no new changes to the transportation network for the year of 2015, so 2015 VMT is not re-estimated with TDM model and previous model results are carried over in this document just to keep tables in formats more consistent with the original RTP document.

The modeled VMTs were adjusted with the base year traffic volumes from Highway Performance Management System (HPMS) and then used as the input into MOVES model to produce CO and Ozone emissions. The MOVES modeled CO emissions for month of January are used for the determination. Table 24 below shows the CO emissions from the MOVES model.

NEW Table 24. Net CO Emissions

Emissions in Tons Per Day

2015 2020 2030 2040

Modeled CO Emissions 273.01 212.74 136.51 99.75

TCM’s Credited in Model n/a n/a n/a n/a Net CO Emissions 273.01 215.35 136.49 99.30

Source: MOVES model results by Regional Transportation Commission staff February 2020, RTP/TIP Amendment

The next few tables show the calculation of the PM10 emissions. The adjusted VMTs are calculated by applying HPMS adjustment factors to the TDM modeled VMTs. The PM10 emissions from mobile source, construction and erosion and the total PM10 emissions are presented in the next three tables.

NEW Table 25. PM10 Roadway Analysis for Horizon Years

2017-2040 RTP 2006 2015 2020 2030 2040

Facility Type

Adjusted 2015 AAWDVMT

Adjusted 2020 AAWDVMT

Adjusted 2030 AAWDVMT

Adjusted 2040 AAWDVMT

PM10 Emission Factors (g/v-m)

Paved Road Emissions (kg/day)

Paved Road Emissions (kg/day)

Paved Road Emissions (kg/day)

Paved Road Emissions (kg/day)

External connectors 269,121 292,952 333,068 362,276 1.22 328 357 406 442

System Ramps 564,938 1,004,096 1,188,751 1,365,398 1.225 692 1,230 1,456 1,673

Minor Arterials 4,620,954 5,193,783 6,033,266 6,712,782 1.22 5,638 6,336 7,361 8,190

Major Arterials 14,847,618 14,213,501 16,506,139 18,062,862 0.761 11,299 10,816 12,561 13,746

Ramps 1,041,920 1,560,600 1,770,607 1,911,002 1.225 1,276 1,912 2,169 2,341

Interstates 8,374,426 9,565,875 10,794,154 12,521,122 0.066 553 631 712 826

Freeways 3,787,905 6,727,158 8,898,150 10,153,786 0.066 250 444 587 670

Beltway 203,764 126,694 0 24,615 0.066 13 8 0 2

Collectors 2,507,731 3,112,707 3,612,247 3,946,272 1.225 3,072 3,813 4,425 4,834 Centroid connectors 3,235,827 3,444,180 3,930,342 4,248,782 3.671 11,879 12,644 14,428 15,597

Other Local Roads 31,590 80,219 107,683 121,320 3.671 116 294 395 445

HOV Lanes 289,184 1,494,841 1,798,676 1,786,610 0.066 19 99 119 118

Public Transit Bus 53,000 60,950 71,921 71,921 3.671 195 224 264 264

Intra-zonal 242,172 411,435 476,791 520,112 3.671 889 1,510 1,750 1,909

DAILY TOTALS 40,070,149 47,288,993 55,521,797 61,808,862 36,219 40,320 46,635 51,057

Convert to US tons per day 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.001102

PM10 Emissions (Tons per day) 39.91 44.4 51.39 56.27

006 Mobile Source PM10 Emissions Budgets for the Las Vegas Valley

141.41 141.41 141.41 141.41

AAWDVMT=Average Annual Week Day Vehicle Miles Traveled. Regional transportation Commission Staff, Transit Daily Miles was calculated by the RTC Transit Department. February 2020, RTP/TIP Amendment

7.2.3. PM10 Emissions from Construction and Wind Erosion

New Table 27. PM10 Emissions from Highway Construction and Wind Erosion

2015 2020 2030 2040

SOURCE Link Lane Link Lane Link Lane Link Lane CONSTRUCTION Construction Miles 0.0 0.0 96.8 451.5 184.2 817.1 50.5 291.1 Horizon Year Total Projects Number of months in Horizon Year 1 60 120 120 Estimated Acreage 0 657 1189 423

Emissions Factors (tons/acre/mon) 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 PM10 Vehicle Emission (tons/day) 0.00 9.07 16.41 5.85 Best Practices Reduction (%) 68% 68% 68% 68% Net Pm 10 Emissions (tons/day) 0 2.902 5.252 1.871

WIND EROSION Estimated Acreage 0 657 1189 423

Erosion Rate (tons/acre/day) 35% of site 0.000

76 0.000

8 0.000

8 0.000

76

65% of site 0.019

8 0.019

8 0.019

8 0.019

8 PM10 Emissions (tons/day) 0.00 4.88 8.82 3.14 Sections 90-94 Reduction (%) 71% 71% 71% 71%

Net Pm 10 Emissions (tons/day) 0.00 1.41 2.559

0.911

6

Source: Regional Transportation Commission staff. February 2020, RTP/TIP Amendment .

New Table 28. Total PM10 Mobile Source Emissions Per Day for Horizon Years

SOURCE 2015 2020 2023 2030 2040

Paved Road Dust 39.91 44.43 46.52 51.39 56.27 Vehicle Emissions 1.21 1.35 1.42 1.57 1.75 Highway Construction 0.00 2.90 3.61 5.25 1.87 Windblown Construction Dust 0.00 1.41 1.76 2.56 0.91 PM10 Mobile Source Emissions 41.13 50.10 53.30 60.77 60.80

BUDGET 141.41 141.41 141.41 141.41 141.41

Source: Regional Transportation Commission Staff. 2023 emissions are interpolated from 2020 and 2030 emissions. February 2020, RTP/TIP Amendment

Note that the VMT for 2040 is higher than VMT for 2030, so higher PM10 from roadway for 2040 than 2030. But the PM10 emissions from roadway construction and wind erosion are lower for 2040 than that for 2030 due to fewer roadway projects for the period between 2030 and 2040. This resulted in the total PM10 for 2040 is very close to that for 2030.

Table 29 below shows the final CO and PM10 Conformity for the Amendment.

NEW Table 29. 2017-2040 RTP CO and PM10 Conformity Summary

Year

CO (tons/day)

Conformity

Requirement

PM10 (tons/day)

Conformity

Requirement Emissions

Emissions

Budget Emissions

Emissions

Budget

2015 273 686 Satisfied 41.13 141.41 Satisfied 2020 215.35 704 Satisfied 50.10 141.41 Satisfied 2023 53.30 141.41 Satisfied 2030 136.49 704 Satisfied 60.77 141.41 Satisfied 2040 99.30 704 Satisfied 60.80 141.41 Satisfied

Source: Regional Transportation Commission staff February 2020, RTP/TIP Amendment

Ozone Budgets and Ozone Determination

On October 23, 2018, Department of Air Quality, Clark County (DAQ) submitted Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan to EPA for approval. In the revision, DAQ established new Ozone budgets for the whole Clark County. These budgets are defined for the two precursors of Ozone, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and the Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX), as set out in Table 30 A. New Table 30 A. NOx and VOC MVEBs for Clark County - Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions

Budgets in Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan

Year NOx MVEBs (tpd) VOC MVEBs (tpd)

2008 - attainment 89.5 42.46

2015 - interim 90.92 53.94

2022 - maintenance 86.74 52.96

Source: Revision to Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan Clark County Department of Air Quality, October 2018 On July 11, 2019 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to conditionally approve a revision to the State of Nevada’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Clark County. The revision consists of an update to certain elements of the maintenance plan for the Clark County air quality planning area for the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or ‘‘standards’’), including the emissions inventories, maintenance demonstration, and motor vehicle emissions budgets. The EPA is proposing to conditionally approve the SIP revision because the Clark County ozone SIP, as revised, continues to provide for maintenance of the 1997 ozone NAAQS and, upon fulfillment of certain commitments, will not interfere with attainment or reasonable further progress of the other NAAQS, and the budgets meet the applicable transportation conformity requirements. The proposed approval is conditional because it is based on commitments to submit a SIP revision to reduce the safety margin allocations for the budgets within one year of final conditional approval.

Using the ozone budgets in conditional approval of revision of maintenance plan, the ozone determination for this Plan Amendment has been performed. The Ozone Conformity analysis has been performed by using air emission model MOVES. All input files and assumptions, including the Travel Demand Model output VMTs by facility and by speed, are the same as that used for tests for CO. The MOVES model was run for month of July to get highest ozone emission estimates. In addition to RTP horizon years 2020, 2030 and 2040, TransCAD and MOVES models have been run for 2022 too since year 2022 is MOVES budget year. Year 2015 was not rerun for the same reason explained earlier in this document. The modeled VMTs were adjusted with the base year traffic volumes from HPMS and then used as the input into MOVES model to produce Ozone emissions.

Since the ozone budgets are for the whole Clark County, the ozone conformity analysis should include the emissions for the whole Clark County that is larger than RTC transportation model area. Therefore, the MOVES emissions for the Transportation modeling area are factored to get the county total emissions. A factor of 1.077 is calculated by using the information of County Total HPMS and percent HPMS for Clark County areas outside transportation model areas. The final county total NOx and VOC emissions for all horizon years are all below the budget levels. Table 30 B. demonstrates the ozone conformity tests that modeled emissions factored to the whole Clark County are lower than the Emission budgets and therefore satisfied the ozone conformity requirements.

New Table 30 B. 2017-2040 RTP Ozone Conformity Test Summary (February 2020) Updated

Year

NOx (tons/day)

Conformity

Requirement

VOC (tons/day)

Conformity

Requirement Emissions

Emissions

Budget Emissions

Emissions

Budget

2015 69.01 90.92 Satisfied 35 53.94 Satisfied 2020 38.38 90.92 Satisfied 25.22 53.94 Satisfied 2022 31.08 86.74 Satisfied 21.34 52.96 Satisfied 2030 18.86 86.74 Satisfied 15.83 52.96 Satisfied 2040 13.52 86.74 Satisfied 12.17 52.96 Satisfied

Source: Regional Transportation Commission staff. February 2020

In conclusion, Table 29 and Table 30B in this document demonstrate that all conformity requirements are satisfied for all three pollutes, PM10 , CO and Ozone for this amended RTP and TIP.

• PUBLIC NOTICE •Notice of Comment Period and Public Information Meeting for the

2017-2040 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) is seeking public comment on the 2017 - 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment, number 19-27. This amendment adds the following projects to the RTP:

• Downtown Access Environmental Study Project on US-95, between Rancho Blvd. and Mojave Rd.• Downtown Access Construction Project on US-95, between Rancho Blvd. and Mojave Rd. • Add truck climbing lane on I-15 northbound, 1.2 miles west of US-93 • Add truck climbing lane on I-15 northbound, Sandhill Blvd. to Nevada/Arizona Stateline• Resurfacing and extending 20 truck parking spaces on I-15 northbound and an additional 20 on I-15 southbound, north of Logandale/Overton interchange • Add 100 truck parking spaces on I-15 northbound and an additional 100 on I-15 southbound, north of Glendale • Interchange improvements on CC-215 westbound, between Grand Montecito Pkwy. and Tenaya Way, and at Lone Mountain Rd.• Replace bridge structures on I-515, at Eastern Ave. and at Desert Inn Rd.• Complete Streets Improvements on Rancho Dr., between Sahara Ave. and Mesquite Ave.• Complete Streets Improvements on Charleston Blvd., between Rancho Dr. and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.• Road widening on North 5th St., between Cheyenne Ave. and Lone Mountain Rd.• Roadway widening on Rainbow Blvd., between Blue Diamond Rd. and CC-215

The RTC has determined that the addition of the listed projects to the RTP do not impact air quality. Project details and the air quality conformity report will be available at the RTC Administration Building or at rtcsnv.com during a 30-day public comment period from Monday, February 10, 2020 to Wednesday, March 11, 2020. A public information meeting will be held during our Executive Advisory Committee meeting on February 27, 2020 from 9:15 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. at the RTC Administrative Building, room 296, located at 600 South Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89106. Submit your comments or questions by March 11, 2020: Attn: Karen Castro Email: castrok@rtcsnv.com Phone: 702-676-1698 TDD: 702-676-1834 Mail to: RTC of Southern Nevada 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89106

For more information visit: www.rtcsnv.com

To request an interpreter, please call (702) 676-1749at least 48 hours before the scheduled meeting

• AVISO PÚBLICO •Noti�cación de periodo de comentario público y reunión pública sobre una

enmienda al Plan Regional de Transporte (RTP) del año 2017-2040 La Comisión Regional de Transporte del Sur de Nevada (RTC) solicita comentarios del público sobre la enmienda (no. 19-27) al RTP del año 2017-2040. La enmienda al RTP agrega los siguientes proyectos:

• Proyecto de Estudio Ambiental de Acceso al Centro en US-95, entre Rancho Blvd. y Mojave Rd.• Proyecto de Construcción de Acceso al Centro en US-95, entre Rancho Blvd. y Mojave Rd. • Carril de escalada en I-15 dirección norte, 1.2 millas al oeste de US-93 • Carril de escalada en I-15 dirección norte, entre Sandhill Rd. y la línea de estado de Nevada/Arizona • Revestimiento y extensión de 20 espacios de estacionamiento de camiones en I-15 dirección norte y 20 adicional en I-15 dirección sur, al norte del intercambio de Logandale/Overton • Agregar 100 espacios de estacionamiento de camiones en I-15 dirección norte y 100 adicional en I-15 dirección sur, al norte de Glendale • Mejoramientos de intercambio en CC-215 dirección oeste, entre Grand Montecito Pkwy. y Tenaya Way, y en Lone Mountain Rd.• Reemplazar estructuras de puente en I-515, en Eastern Ave. y en Desert Inn Rd.• Mejoras completas de calles en Rancho Dr., entre Sahara Ave. y Mesquite Ave.• Mejoras completas de calles en Charleston Blvd., entre Rancho Dr. y Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.• Ampliación de carreteras en North 5th St., entre Cheyenne Ave. y Lone Mountain Rd.• Ampliación de carreteras en Rainbow Blvd., entre Blue Diamond Rd. y CC-215

Esta enmienda al RTP no afecta la calidad del aire y es consistente con el RTP. Los detalles del proyecto estarán disponibles en el Edificio de Administración de RTC y en rtcsnv.com durante el período de comentarios públicos de 30 días desde el lunes 10 de febrero de 2020 hasta el miércoles 11 de marzo de 2020. El 27 de febrero de 9:15 a.m. a 11:15 a.m. se llevará a cabo una reunión pública en el Edificio de Administración de RTC, cuarto 296, localizado en el 600 South Grand Central Pkwy Las Vegas, NV 89106. La reunión se llevará a cabo al mismo tiempo que la reunión del Comité Asesor Ejecutivo.Enviar comentarios/preguntas antes de las 5 p.m. el miércoles 11 de marzo de 2020:A la atención de: Karen CastroTeléfono: (702) 676-1698TDD: 702-676-1834Correo a: RTC of Southern Nevada600 S. Grand Central ParkwayLas Vegas, Nevada 89106Para más información visite: www.rtcsnv.com

Para solicitar un intérprete, por favor de llamar (702) 676 1698por lo menos 48 horas antes de la reunión pública.

南內華達州區域交通委員會正就2017-2040年區域交通計劃修正案（第19-27號）徵詢公眾意見。 該修正案將以下項目添加到區域交通計劃中。‧Rancho Blvd.與Mojave Rd.之間的US-95市中心通道環境研究項目 （Downtown Access Environmental Study Project）‧Rancho Blvd.與Mojave Rd.之間的US-95市中心通道建設項目 （Downtown Access Construction Project）‧在I-15北行線增加卡車攀登車道，US-93以西1.2英里‧在I-15北行線增加卡車攀登車道，Sandhill Blvd.至內州/亞利桑那州Stateline‧重鋪和擴展I-15北行線20個卡車停車位，以及I-15南行線額外20個卡車停車位， 在Logandale / Overton交匯處以北‧ 在I-15北行線增加100個卡車停車位，並在I-15南行線增加100個停車位， 在Glendale以北‧CC-215西行線交叉道改善工程，在Grand Montecito Pkwy.與Tenaya Way之間， 以及在Lone Mountain Rd.‧更換I-515橋樑結構，在Eastern Ave.和在Desert Inn Rd.‧Sahara Ave.與Mesquite Ave.之間的Rancho Dr.街道變為機動與非機動 共享的安全街道的改善工程‧Rancho Dr.與Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd之間的Charleston Blvd.街道變為機動與 非機動共享的安全街道的改善工程‧Cheyenne Ave.與Lone Mountain Rd.之間的North 5th St.道路加寬工程‧Blue Diamond Rd.與CC-215之間的Rainbow Blvd.的道路加寬工程

南內華達州區域交通委員會已確定，將列出的項目添加到區域交通計劃中不會影響空氣質量。2020年2月10日（星期一）至2020年3月11日（星期三）為期30天的公眾意見徵詢期期間，項目詳細信息和空氣質量合格報告將在RTC行政大樓或rtcsnv.com網站上提供。公眾信息會議將於2020年2月27日上午9時15分至11時15分在執行官顧問委員會（Executive Advisory Committee）會議上舉行，地址為RTC Administrative Building, Room 296, 600 South Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89106。

請於2020年3月11日之前提交你的意見或問題：致: Karen Castro電郵：castrok@rtcsnv.com, 電話：702-676-1698, TDD: 702-676-1834郵寄：RTC of Southern Nevada, 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV 89106如欲獲取更多信息，請瀏覽：www.rtcsnv.com請於預定會議日期至少48小時前預約傳譯員，電話號碼為（702）676-1698。

‧通告‧2017-2040年區域交通計劃修正案意見徵詢期和公眾信息會議通知

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: SOUTHERN NEVADA CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS PETITIONER: M. J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA REVIEW AND APPROVE THE 2019 ANNUAL REPORT OF CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action BACKGROUND: The Congestion Management Process (CMP) is a federally required process for regional congestion management. The CMP provides an analysis of transportation system performance, lists congestion mitigation strategies, and evaluates the effectiveness of implemented strategies. The Southern Nevada CMP is an ongoing systematic process and a useful tool for transportation planning activities by providing analysis on multimodal transportation system performance, evaluation of congestion mitigation strategies, and enhancing mobility of persons and goods in Southern Nevada. The 2019 CMP updates the 2018 CMP report. It reflects a regional approach to identify and address congestion concerns, features a “toolbox” to evaluate various congestion conditions, provides travel time data for local stakeholders and decision makers, and addresses the most congested locations. The full report has been posted to the Transportation Planning page of the RTC website, located at: https://www.rtcsnv.com/projects-initiatives/transportation-planning/planning-studies-reports/. CMP data can be viewed via an interactive dashboard at the following URL: https://arcg.is/0ejyei0 . The CMP maps are included in the Planning Analysis Tool (PAT) program in the website: http://rtcws.rtcsnv.com/projectViewer/index.html . RTC staff will give a brief presentation on the CMP. Respectfully submitted, ___________________________ CRAIG RABORN Director of Metropolitan Planning Organization bx Non-Consent

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0CE11596-B636-4D84-9FB3-E8D16A6E01F2

1

R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N

2019 Congestion Management Process

What is the CMP?A process to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts of congestion over time.

2

CongestionPerformance Measures

Travel Time Index (TTI) – Average travel time divided by free flow travel time

Planning Time Index (PTI) – how much time is needed to almost always arrive on time

2019 Update1. Make data available for

local stakeholders and decision-makers

2. A systematic approach to identification, ranking and monitoring of congestion in the region

3. Evaluate speed data with other data sources using GIS

3

Morning Peak (Mar-Apr 2018) Afternoon Peak (Mar-Apr 2018)

MEASURING CONGESTION. PM PEAKTop 10 Most Congested Segments by Travel Time Index (TTI) (4-6 PM PK) . March-April 2017/2018

# Road Segment 2018 2017 Difference

TTI PTI TTI PTI TTI PTI

1 I-15 N Segment 5: from Tropicana Ave to Charleston Blvd5.27 8.96 3.5 4.56 1.77 4.4

2 I-15 S Segment 4: from Lake Mead Blvd to Charleston Blvd2.88 5.68 2.61 4.73 0.27 0.95

3 I-515 N Segment 1: from I-15 to Eastern Ave2.41 3.42 2.82 5.29 -0.41 -1.87

4 I-215 W Segment 1: from Airport Connector to I-152.22 2.95 3.12 4.45 -0.9 -1.5

5 CR-215 N Segment 6: from Rainbow Blvd to Russel Rd1.81 3.06 1.16 1.71 0.65 1.35

6 Rancho Drive S Segment 4: from US-95 to Sahara Ave1.79 2.57 1.4 2.09 0.39 0.48

7 I-215 E Segment 2: from Airport connector to St. Rose Pkwy1.72 3.95 1.52 2.63 0.2 1.32

8 CR-215 N Segment 5: from Charleston Blvd to Tropicana Ave1.7 2.21 1.33 1.99 0.37 0.22

9 CR-215 N Segment 7: from Rainbow Blvd to I-151.7 2.22 2.53 3.46 -0.83 -1.24

10 Rainbow Blvd N Segment 3: from Tropicana Ave to Charleston Blvd1.68 2.67 1.54 2.32 0.14 0.35

4

How to access RTC Processed INRIX DATA?Current Web Application: https://arcg.is/0ejyei0Former Web Application: http://rtcws.rtcsnv.com/projectViewer/

Inrix Bottleneck Tool - Criteria

5

MEASURING CONGESTION. PM PEAKTop 5 Most Impactful Urban Bottlenecks in 2018 by Inrix Congestion Score

# Road Segment 2018

1 I-15 N @ Wilber Clark/West Desert Inn Road662,225

2 I-15 S @ Charleston Blvd/Exit 41570,411

3 I-15 N @ Sahara Ave/Exit 40340,601

4 I-515 N @ Casino Center Blvd/Exit 75158,730

5 I-215 W @ Decatur Blvd/Exit 11155,932

I-15 N @ WILBER CLARK/WEST DESERT INN ROAD

2018 Bottleneck Summary

6

STRATEGIES FOR ADDRESSING CONGESTION

Tier 1: Reduce Person Trips or Vehicle Miles Traveled

Tier 2: Shift to Other Modes

FOUR STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS CONGESTION:

STRATEGIES FOR ADDRESSING CONGESTION Tier 3: Improve Roadway Operations

Tier 4: Improve Capacity 

7

THE ROADAHEAD FOR CMP 2020

• Improve GIS data integration to better explore potential causes of localized congestion and to evaluate implemented strategies.

• Update strategies to reflect ongoing technological and programmatic advances.

Questions?

Link to Report & Web Application:Draft CMP 2019

https://arcg.is/0ejyei0http://rtcws.rtcsnv.com/projectViewer/index.html

Contacts: Beth Xie  xieb@rtcsnv.com 702‐676‐1722Grant Shirts shirtsg@rtcsnv.com 702‐676‐1966

2

Acknowledgements

Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Board of Commissioners

Clark County Commissioner Larry Brown City of Henderson Mayor Debra March City of Las Vegas Mayor Carolyn Goodman Clark County Commissioner James Gibson City of North Las Vegas Councilman Isaac Barron City of Mesquite Councilman George Gault City of Las Vegas Councilman Stavros S. Anthony City of Boulder City Mayor Kiernan McManus

Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada

Metropolitan Planning Organization Staff Chief Executive Officer M.J. Maynard Deputy Chief Executive Officer David Swallow Director of MPO Craig Raborn Manager Transportation Planning Andrew Kjellman Manager Transportation Planning Beth Xie Principal Transportation Planner Chin-Cheng Chen Principal Transportation Planner Mohammad Farhan Principal Transportation Planner Deborah Reardon Senior Transportation Planner Hui Shen Senior Transportation Planner Daniel Fazekas Senior Transportation Planner Lijuan Su Senior Transportation Planner Rush Wickes Transportation Planner, CMP Preparer Grant Shirts

All Icons made by Freepik or Eucalyp from www.flaticon.com

3 Table of Contents

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... 3

INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 6 THE PRIMARY SOURCES OF CONGESTION ........................................................................................ 6 RTC’S 3C CMP ........................................................................................................................... 8

OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................. 10 FULFILL LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT ................................................................................................. 10 MANAGE CONGESTION EFFICIENTLY ............................................................................................. 12

CMP NETWORK ............................................................................................................................. 13 NETWORK DEFINITION ................................................................................................................... 13

PERFORMANCE METRICS ............................................................................................................. 15 TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY METRICS .................................................................................................. 15 SELECTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES ............................................................................................ 16

DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................................... 21 DATA COLLECTION ...................................................................................................................... 21 DATA MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................... 24 DATA INNOVATION ...................................................................................................................... 26

ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 29 SCOPE OF ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 29 SYSTEM-WIDE OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 29 BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................. 32 CMP DASHBOARD ...................................................................................................................... 40

STRATEGY TOOLBOX .................................................................................................................... 42 STRATEGY TIERS ............................................................................................................................ 42

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN............................................................................................................... 48 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT FUNDING ........................................................................................ 48 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ..................................................................................... 50

EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS ........................................................................................................... 67 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL FORECASTS ........................................................................................... 67

CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 70 APPENDIX A: DETAILED CORRIDOR EVALUATIONS ................................................................... 72

I-15 ............................................................................................................................................ 73 US-95/I-515 ............................................................................................................................... 75 CR-215/I-215- BELTWAY ............................................................................................................ 77 RANCHO DR ............................................................................................................................... 79 MARTIN L KING BLVD ................................................................................................................... 81

APPENDIX B: REPORT REFERENCE ............................................................................................... 83 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ 83 LIST OF MAPS ............................................................................................................................... 85 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. 86 ENDNOTES ................................................................................................................................... 87

4

5 Table of Contents

Executive Summary This document, Congestion Management Process (CMP), provides a policy

making reference for Southern Nevadans impacted by traffic congestion. Being a living document, it is continually edited and updated over time to respond to changes in system performance, community values, statute and technology.

It is managed by the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) which serves as the home to the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), the policy body responsible for regional transportation planning in the Las Vegas Metropolitan Planning Area.

The CMP emphasizes the feasibility of cost efficient strategies such as Travel Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation Systems Management (TSM). TDM focuses on user behavior modification strategies to reduce single-occupancy vehicles (SOV) and shift travel away from peak periods. TSM involves effective management of existing infrastructure through intersection improvements, signalization changes and freeway optimization.

The report begins with an examination of the causes of traffic congestion and the underlying objectives of the CMP. Road network performance is reported using federally required metrics such as regional travel time reliability and peak hour excessive delay. The ancillary congestion management performance measures of bus on-time performance and incident clearance time are also treated.

In addition to performance reporting, the report defines the network of study and describes methods of data collection. Collected data leverages travel time reliability metrics to allow for analysis which varies from the traditional approach of projecting future traffic volumes and determining it’s ratio to current capacity. Travel time reliability metrics and bottleneck severity metrics create a history of traffic on Southern Nevada’s road network and is a reference for where and when congestion has occurred overtime. This history is easily accessed via the report’s companion web map application in which variables impacting congestion (e.g. construction projects) are associated with seasonal traffic variations.

The report also contains detailed findings of Southern Nevada’s most severely congested road segments and most impactful bottleneck locations. The many congestion management strategies implemented by the RTC and partnering agencies are accounted for and organized into four prioritized categories. All the aforementioned resources provide a starting point from which to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented congestion management strategies. The success of the CMP depends upon it being fully integrated into the regional transportation planning process.

6 Introduction

Introduction Congestion management is the application of

strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts of congestion on the movement of people and goods.

Congestion occurs when there are too many vehicles at the same place at the same time. In this sense, congestion deals with two dimensions: the where (a location such as an intersection, roadway segment, or transit route) and the when (time and date). As a major metropolitan area and global tourist destination, Southern Nevada roads experience congestion. Understanding where and when the congestion is occurring is prerequisite for managing it efficiently.

The Primary Sources of Congestion There are a variety of circumstances which cause congestion to form.

Figure ~ is a finding of a 2005 national Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) study on the sources of traffic congestion. The study is entitled “Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Trends and Advanced Strategies for

Congestion Mitigation”.

Figure ~: Sources of Congestion by Type of Incident (National Summary)

5%

10%

15%

25%5%

40%

Special EventsWork ZonesBad WeatherTraffic IncidentsPoor Signal TimingBottlenecks

7 The Primary Sources of Congestion

Of these six major sources of congestion, four are classified non-recurring and two recurring. The dichotomy as well as a brief description of each source of congestion are given below.

Non-recurring Sources of Congestion:

o Special events are spikes in traffic volumes due to popular local events. o Work zones occur when road building or maintenance activities take place. o Bad weather in Southern Nevada ranges from floods to dust storms. o Traffic incidents involve debris on the road, stalled vehicles or collisions.

Recurring Sources of Congestion:

o Poor Signal timing and phasing exists when signal calibrations are not optimized for the traffic volumes of the intersecting roads.

o Bottlenecks cause traffic to queue upstream of excessive roadway demand.

Regardless of its source, traffic congestion continues to challenge our nation‘s transportation system and is responsible for gallons of wasted fuel and hours of wasted time.

8 Introduction

RTC’s 3C CMP Transportation planning within a metropolitan region

represents a comprehensive, continuing, and cooperative (3C) process to support the needs, vision, and goals of the region.

Comprehensively Planning The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and the CMP are tools that implement strategies pursuant to adopted objectives. Each action of the CMP is both supportive of and supported by the RTP, TIP and UPWP. These actions are presented as a sequence of eight activities in the FHWA’s CMP guidebook (Figure ~).I

Figure ~: 8 Elements of the CMP

9 RTC’s 3C CMP

Continually Planning A continuing planning process requires that the RTP, TIP, UPWP and CMP

receive updates on a periodic basis. Depending on regional air quality attainment status, the RTP cycle is every five (attainment) or four (non-attainment) years. As for the CMP, it must, at minimum, be updated often

enough to provide recent information as an input to each RTP update. To fulfill this requirement, it is prudent to update the CMP at least 1 year prior to each scheduled RTP update. However, more frequent updates provide RTC with timelier feedback.

Cooperatively Planning As depicted in Figure ~, the RTC manages transit, traffic and metropolitan

planning, and administers Southern Nevada Strong, a collaborative program dedicated to bettering Southern Nevada. It’s the only agency in the country to

handle all four of these functions within a single organization.

Figure ~: Primary Functions of the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada

Despite having many capabilities in-house, collaboration with partners—

including state, regional and local transportation facility owners and operators—enhances data collection and analysis. The Data Collection and Management Plan, located within this document, describes a means for leveraging both internal and external sources of information.

10 Objectives

Objectives The following regional objectives are defined generally. In future iterations

of the CMP, they may be revised to become more specific, measurable, agreed upon, realistic, and time-bound. These objectives support RTC’s vision

of providing a safe, convenient and effective regional transportation system that enhances mobility and air quality for citizens and visitors.

Fulfill Legislative Requirement The CMP exists as an administrative mechanism designed by federal

legislation to mitigate the undesired impacts of traffic congestion. It is required in metropolitan regions with populations greater than 200,000. Since the 1970 census, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Statistical Area has had a population well over 200,000.II As such, Southern Nevada has been designated a Transportation Management Area (TMA) requiring a CMP.

While there are specific federal imperatives, The State of Nevada has not released any additional requirements or guidelines for the CMP.

Legislative Context The federal government moved to intervene against worsening

traffic congestion by passing the 1991 transportation authorization bill known as the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). ISTEA required Metropolitan Planning Organizations to carry out a systematic and transparent process for identifying and managing congestion. Guidelines for congestion management were further developed through the subsequent passage of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1998 and the Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) in 2005.

Since 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) provides the current programmatic framework guiding the growth and development of the country’s transportation infrastructure. Its policies facilitate the development of a performance-based and multimodal surface transportation program. On December 4, 2015, the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was signed into law but only made minor edits to the existing provisions of MAP-21.

11 Fulfill Legislative Requirement

Summary of Current Federal Law The following summarizes the federal code for

the CMP in TMAs.III

a. The CMP provides for safe and effective integrated management and operation of the multimodal transportation system.

b. The CMP should result in multimodal system performance measures and strategies reflected in the RTP and TIP.

c. The level of system performance may vary by type of transportation facility, geographic location (metropolitan area or subarea), and/or time of day. Strategies should:

1. Manage demand 2. Reduce single occupant vehicle travel 3. Improve transportation system management and operations 4. Improve efficient service integration within and across modes

d. The CMP shall be developed, established, and implemented in coordination

with transportation system management and operations activities. The CMP shall include: 1. Methods to monitor and evaluate the performance of the multimodal

transportation system and its congestion; 2. A definition of congestion management objectives and appropriate

performance measures that are tailored to the specific needs of the area with other stakeholders in the covered area;

3. An establishment of a coordinated program for data collection and system performance monitoring to define the extent and duration of congestion, to contribute in determining the causes of congestion, and evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of implemented actions;

4. An identification and evaluation of the anticipated performance and expected benefits of appropriate congestion management strategies, such as demand management measures, traffic operational improvements, public transportation improvements, ITS technologies, and where necessary, additional system capacity;

5. An identification of an implementation schedule, implementation responsibilities, and possible funding sources for each strategy proposed for implementation; and

6. An implementation of a process for periodic assessment of the effectiveness of implemented strategies.

12 Objectives

Manage Congestion Efficiently The CMP assists in achieving the following objectives that—together—

ensure the efficient management of congestion.

Develop a Structured Process for Analyzing Congestion Issues The CMP provides a framework for identifying and responding to

congestion in a consistent and coordinated fashion.

Follow an Objectives-Driven, Performance-based Approach Through the use of performance measures, the CMP provides a

mechanism for ensuring that investment decisions are made with a clear focus on desired outcomes. Screening strategies, using objective criteria, help demonstrate which approaches to congestion management are most effective over time, assess why they work (or do not), and help practitioners target locations where they may be most successful.

Promote Increased Collaboration and Coordination The CMP ought to bring an expanded group of partners and stakeholders

into the regional transportation planning process, including land use planning agencies and agencies responsible for transportation system operations. By considering all of the factors that are important to the public, the CMP also helps to ensure that selected congestion management strategies are contextually appropriate for the community and consistent with the regional vision.

Allocate Resources More Effectively The CMP provides a mechanism for identifying short, medium, and long-

term strategies for addressing congestion on a system-wide, corridor-level, and site-specific basis. It also highlights travel demand management and operations strategies and can bring attention to issues such as transportation system reliability and non-recurring congestion, which are not well addressed through traditional transportation demand modeling.

Link Project Development and Environmental Review The CMP helps link planning and project development by providing

information to support the environmental analysis conducted under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

13 Network Definition

CMP Network This report focuses on roadways included in the

CMP Network as defined in Map ~.

Network Definition The CMP Network includes all interstates,

freeways, expressways, principal arterials, and minor arterials which have been identified using the traffic message channel (TMC) standard in Clark County, Nevada.

Since 2015, more and more roadways have been added to the CMP network. Currently, more than 3,150 road segments representing more than 2,600 directional miles make up the CMP network. In addition to a high level of coverage, a relatively high level of spatial detail is achieved by dividing surface streets into directional spans from one exit or entrance ramp (i.e. intersection) to the next. These attributes make it a convenient unit for either system-wide or corridor-specific analysis.

14 CMP Network

Map ~: The CMP System Network

15 Travel Time Reliability Metrics

Performance Metrics CMP performance measures monitor congestion and are

dependent upon data availability. They indicate the extent and severity of congestion system wide, along corridors, road segments, or intersections. Collected overtime, performance measures serve as a basis for evaluating the impact of implemented congestion management strategies.

Travel Time Reliability Metrics The following metrics are calculated from vendor-provided data and

defined by the Travel Time Reliability publication provided by the Federal Highway Administration and produced by the Texas Transportation Institute with Cambridge Systematics, Inc:

Buffer Time — the extra time (or time cushion) that travelers must add to their average travel time when planning trips to ensure on-time arrival (95% Travel Time - Average Travel Time).

Buffer Index — the Buffer Time's percentage value of the Average Travel Time ((95% Travel Time - Average Travel Time) / Average Travel Time). Its value increases as reliability gets worse. For example, a buffer index of .4 (40 percent) means that, for a 20-minute average travel time, a traveler should budget an additional 8 minutes (20 minutes x 40 percent = 8 minutes) to ensure on-time arrival most of the time.

Planning Time —total time a traveler should plan for to ensure on-time arrival (95% Travel Time). A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time, it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late only 1 day a month.

Planning Time Index — near-worst case travel time as a percentage of the ideal travel time (95% Travel Time / Free-flow Travel Time). This differs from the buffer index because it includes typical delay as well as unexpected delay. For example, a planning time index of 1.60 means that, for a 15-minute trip in light traffic, the total time that should be planned for the trip is 24 minutes (15 minutes x 1.60 = 24 minutes).

Travel Time Index — Travel time represented as a percentage of the ideal travel time (Travel Time / Free-flow Travel Time). This is a measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak hour.

The Travel Time Index (TTI) and Planning Time Index (PTI) play a large role in creating performance rankings (see CMP Dashboard) and evaluating corridors (see Appendix A). Lower ratios of TTI to PTI indicates less reliable travel times and the prevalence of non-recurring sources of congestion.

16 Performance Metrics

Selected Performance Measures The number of selected performance measures is

intentionally limited in number. In addition, they are all based on data that is easy to collect and analyze. This simplified approach increases the likelihood that performance measures will be consistently updated and integrated into the decision-making process.

National Performance Management Research Data Set Procured and sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),

the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) is an archived speed and travel time data set (including associated location referencing data) that covers the National Highway System (NHS). NPMRDS provides three data sets containing speeds and travel times at 5 minute intervals on over 400,000 road segments for passenger vehicles, trucks, and trucks and passenger vehicles combined. When applicable, 2022 statewide performance measures targets are denoted.

Level of Travel Time Reliability Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR) is the percent of person-miles

traveled on reporting segment miles having a ratio of 80th percentile travel time to 50th percentile travel time of less than 1.5. Data are collected in 15-minute segments during all time periods between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. local time. Figures ~ and ~ track several years of travel time reliability performance within Clark County.

Figure ~: Percent of the Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate that are Reliable

17 Selected Performance Measures

Figure ~: Percent of the Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS that are Reliable

Truck Travel Time Reliability Freight movement is assessed by the truck travel time reliability (TTTR) Index.

Reporting is divided into five periods: morning peak (6-10 a.m.), midday (10 a.m.-4 p.m.) and afternoon peak (4-8 p.m.) Mondays through Fridays; weekends (6 a.m.-8 p.m.); and overnights for all days (8 p.m.-6 a.m.). The TTTR ratio will be generated by dividing the 95th percentile time by the 50th percentile time for each segment. The TTTR Index is generated by multiplying each segment’s

largest ratio of the five periods by its length, then dividing the sum of all length-weighted segments by the total length of Interstate. Figure ~ tracks several years of truck travel time reliability performance within Clark County.

Figure ~: Truck Travel Time Reliability Index

Peak Hour Excessive Delay Traffic congestion is measured by the annual hours of peak hour excessive

delay (PHED) per capita on the NHS. The threshold for excessive delay will be

18 Performance Metrics

based on the travel time at 20 miles per hour or 60% of the posted speed limit travel time, whichever is greater, and will be measured in 15-minute intervals. Peak travel hours are defined as 6-10 a.m. local time on weekday mornings; the weekday afternoon period is 3-7 p.m. local time. The total excessive delay metric is weighted by vehicle volumes and occupancy. Figure ~ tracks several years of peak hour excessive delay performance within the urbanized area.

Figure ~: Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay Per Capita

User Delay Cost User Delay Cost is calculated for segments whose speeds fall 20 mph or

more below free-flow speed. It is based on two large assumptions. The Texas Transportation Institutes’ annually updated cost per hour for passenger and commercial vehicles, and a vehicle distribution split of 90% passenger and 10% commercial. Also reducing validity is that since 2016, the data collected represents 75.49% of expected observations with coverage dipping overnight. Based on the estimates in Figure ~, traffic delay costs users $0.11 per vehicle mile traveled.

Figure ~: Monthly User Delay Cost Estimates

$0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000 $90,000,000

$100,000,000

19 Selected Performance Measures

Other Data Sets The following selected performance measures are derived for primary data

sources originating from RTC departments. The recent adoption of third party software platforms (e.g. Swiftly) have improved data collection and reporting.

Bus On-Time Performance The on-time performance standard is the percentage of times that buses

depart no more than 1 min before and 5 minutes after the scheduled departure time from a timepoint. 90 percent on-time performance is the adopted contractual standard for operating contractors (MV & Keolis). Nationally, it is a high bar to reach. Figures ~ shows that on-time performance has very consistently approached 90 percent. The low mark was experienced in September of 2017 at 83.2%. While the best performing month was December of 2016 at 88.9%. 2018’s annual average was 86.7%. Of note, the high frequency routes along the strip are not held as strictly to the on-time performance standard.

Figure ~: Monthly Bus On-Time Performance (5 Minute Standard)

Incident Clearance Time From 2014 to 2017, the clearance time performance measure relied solely on

emergency dispatch data. With RTC’s partnership with Waycare in 2018, the total number of logged incidents has more than doubled. In addition, 2018 marked the adoption of a new clearance time target for fatal crashes. Previously, the target was 90 minutes. The new target is 120. Clearance time targets for property damage only (PDO) incidents (30 minutes) and injury incidents (60 minutes) have remained the same.

Due to the adoption of the new system, there are validity concerns for the 2018 data. Table ~ denotes quarterly regional incident clearance time performance since the beginning of 2019.

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%

100.0%

% On-Time Target

20 Performance Metrics

Targets Q1 '19 Q2 '19 Q3 '19 Q4 '19

Total PDO Crashes 1607 1487 902 - # Cleared < 30 Min. 633 648 327 -

Percentage 39.4% 43.6% 36.3% - Total Injury Crashes 657 574 452 - # Cleared < 60 Min. 350 319 248 -

Percentage 53.3% 55.6% 54.9% - Total Fatal Crashes 3 3 2 -

# Cleared < 120 Min. 2 3 0 - Percentage 66.7% 100.0% 0.0% -

Total Crashes 2267 2064 1356 - # Cleared < Target 985 970 575 - % Meeting target 43.4% 47.0% 42.4% -

Table ~: Quarterly Incident Clearance Time Performance Measure

21 Data Collection

Data Collection and Management Plan

The CMP Data Collection and Management Plan outlines how the RTC determines how well the transportation system performs. It is largely dependent upon system performance data. While the data places an emphasis on peak hour congestion, it should not be referenced with the intention of eradicating peak hour congestion for automobiles. Rather, data should be considered to reveal sub-optimal symptoms caused by a multitude of competing interests. Maintaining a nuanced interpretation of CMP data increases the likelihood of it informing the RTP and the TIP in appropriate ways.

Data Collection INRIX

Traditional road sensor networks and mobile devices collect up-to-the-minute speed data from consumer and fleet vehicles. INRIX, a private company, specializes in refining collected traffic data into a form that can be used to assess roadway conditions. RTC accesses their data through a subscription provided by the Nevada Department of Transportation.

Subscribers use web based tools to download raw data for off-line analysis or to export data summary reports. Although limited in functionality, the web service also allow users to visualize and map data such as: o Real Time/Historical Speeds o Travel Time Reliability Metrics o Bottlenecks

INRIX data’s granularity makes it possible to

monitor not only recurring congestion but non-recurring congestion as well. It has the potential to become a valuable resource for transportation

planning and operations management in Southern Nevada.

Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation RTC is proud to have the component known as

the Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation (FAST), which is one of the first truly integrated Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) organizations in the country. From the FAST headquarters, RTC, NDOT

22 Data Collection and Management Plan

and Nevada Highway Patrol personnel work to keep traffic moving on the valley’s freeways and arterials. FAST is able to monitor traffic conditions in real

time remotely through access to streaming data feeds from over 200 traffic cameras deployed across the region. These are complimented with traffic flow detectors embedded in the roadways which measure travel speed.

Data from these devices flow via fiber optic and microwave networks to the FAST control center on a continuous basis. The loops count the number of vehicles traveling across them as well as their average speed. The traffic cameras not only identify the occurrence of traffic incidents but also measure the length of delay.

The data which FAST subsequently produces shows the following details:

o Percent of week days that experience recurring congestion o The average maximum and 95th percentile delay in congestion o When recurring traffic delays typically start on the route o How long traffic delays last o Clearance time of vehicular crashes from freeway travel lanes.

FAST Performance Monitoring and Measurement System The FAST Dashboard (a.k.a. Performance Monitoring & Measurement

System) is a web application totally designed, developed and written using in-house staff. Unfortunately, the technology it was built upon is becoming outdated. As such, the dashboard no longer has full functionality in modern web browsers. It can still be used within Microsoft Internet Explorer.

As seen in Figure ~, the FAST Dashboard is built upon the enormous storehouse of raw data automatically gathered by the ITS NDOT has implemented on its freeway network in southern Nevada, plus incident-specific data logged by FAST’s technicians. However, FAST has recently

migrated to logging incidents into a third party solution known as Waycare.

Figure ~: Screenshot of FAST Performance Dashboard

23 Data Collection

Waycare Waycare’s software as a service platform

provides incident and congestion logs as well as a live map as seen in Figure ~. Many of the data sources collected by FAST now power their platform. This includes the RTC’s

closed-circuit television network, dynamic message signs and freeway flow sensors. New capabilities introduced by the platform include roadway project monitoring, patrol vehicle statuses and event tracking.

Figure ~: Screenshot of Waycare’s Smart Highway Platform

24 Data Collection and Management Plan

Data Management The volume of data available today is astounding, and it will likely only

increase in the future. A principal challenge of preparing the CMP is how to avoid the state of being data rich but information poor. To help manage this dilemma, a number of web-based visualization tools for congestion and bottleneck analysis exist on the INRIX website. Unfortunately, local stakeholders and the general public cannot have access to those proprietary tools. This particular limitation can be circumvented by external usage of the data in geographic information systems (GIS) web applications.

Ritis Platform The Regional Integrated Transportation Information System

(RITIS) is a data-driven platform for transportation analysis, monitoring, and data visualization. While RITIS began in the Nation’s Capital as a way to help coordinate

the real-time operations between Maryland DOT, Virginia DOT, D.C. DOT and WMATA, the system has rapidly expanded to other states and other countries. RTC uses RITIS to access archived INRIX data via their Probe Data Analytics Suite. While much of the data applicable to the CMP are managed inside RITIS, others are managed elsewhere.

Speed Data Using the Massive Data Downloader tool, RTC downloaded the following

data as a comma-separated values file: “All fields for INRIX data for Clark,

Nevada (3664 TMCs) for Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays from Jan 01, 2009 through Dec 27, 2018 between [07:00-08:59] and [16:00-17:59], averaged to every 5th minute.” Once uncompressed, this data has a file size

of roughly 5.33 gigabytes. Upon inspection of the data, INRIX only provides measurements on interchanges until May of 2015. Measurements prior to this are discarded. With 16 gigabytes of RAM, it was possible to process the data in R. It may be necessary in the future to use 10, 15, or 60 minute averaging to reduce file size.

Bottleneck Data Using the Bottleneck Ranking tool, RTC staff downloaded 22 separate

tables each representing a 2 month time period since May, 2015. Remarkably, these tables represent 22,000 INRIX identified bottlenecks.

GIS Platform ArcSDE is software that enables ArcGIS

applications to store, manage and retrieve data in a Relational Database Management Systems (RDBMS). The “Arc” comes from the

25 Data Management

ubiquitous naming convention used by Esri for their products. The SDE part stands for Spatial Database Engine. Utilizing ArcSDE enables RTC to move from a traditional approach — managing separate collections of geographic data files — to an integrated environment in which one can manage spatial data as a continuous database: accessible to the entire organization simultaneously and easily publishable on the Web. The following data originates from various sources, but are managed within ArcSDE.

Projects Data The complexities of construction project management do not easily lend

themselves to the keeping of georeferenced records of on the ground construction activity. The continued adoption of technological innovations would bring with it the promise of more efficient inter-agency collaboration, information dissemination, and project tracking.

RTC’s GIS staff maintain a database of construction projects as part of the Cone Management Working Group. These are stored in two databases. One stores points as lines (i.e. “RTC.GISSDE.MPO_CMWG_L”) and the other as points

(i.e. “RTC.GISSDE.MPO_CMWG_X”). Using GIS, all records with an estimated or

actual construction start time occurring before the New Year are exported as two comma separated values files.

Incident Data The FAST dashboard has an incident dataset with more than 18,027 records

with time stamps beginning in November, 2009 and ending in May, 2018. Waycare’s platform has records beginning in November,

2017 until the current date. Either dataset can be filtered by day and time of day. Using these services, scope specific incidents were exported from the web as comma separated values files.

Employment Data The Department of Employment, Training & Rehabilitation (DETR) consists of

divisions that offer assistance in job training and placement, vocational rehabilitation, workplace discrimination and in collecting and analyzing workforce and economic data. RTC’s data and modeling team regularly

obtains DETR’s employer database as an input into the regional transportation demand model. For it to be utilized, the business addresses listed in the database are geocoded using GIS.

26 Data Collection and Management Plan

Data Innovation It appears that ground transportation is riding a

wave of an unprecedented sea change. In the information age, the RTC is presented with immense opportunities to participate in the process of providing a more environmentally friendly, economically sound and socially equitable transportation system. There is also a lot of uncertainty. To help navigate these uncharted waters, RTC places an emphasis on keeping abreast with technological innovations.

Data Partnerships Due to the private sector activity surrounding the future of transportation,

it is possible that a third party solution may altogether replace the methods outlined in the Data Collection and Management Plan. There are competing companies harvesting vast amounts of transportation data and developing ever more sophisticated tools. These solutions may provide a means for RTC staff to gain a better understanding of traffic behavior over time.

Waze In 2016, the RTC announced a data-sharing partnership with Waze, the

free, real-time crowdsourced navigation app powered by the world’s largest

community of drivers. The app’s user interface is shown in Figure ~. Waze’s Connected Citizens Program brings cities and citizens together to

answer the questions, “What’s happening, and where?” Established as a

two-way data share, Waze provides users with real-time, anonymous, Waze-generated incident and traffic slowdown information directly from the source: drivers themselves. The RTC provides real-time, government-reported data on road construction, traffic accidents and road closures. The breadth of utility proffered by this partnership is increasing as the relationship and platform mature.

27 Data Innovation

Figure ~: Waze Application’s User Interface

Pilot Programs To sample the local benefits of emerging technologies, RTC has the option to

partner with companies through pilot projects. In one such pilot project, the RTC experimented with new ways to find, inspect and mitigate work zones in real time. Technologies from Nexar, iCone, and HAAS Alert were demonstrated on both the Waycare and Waze platforms. The demonstration included traffic cones, barrels, arrow boards, construction and inspection vehicles – all outfitted with new technologies that can communicate with passing vehicles and traffic engineers.

Nexar CityStream is a platform that uses Nexar’s connected vehicle network

(see Figure ~) to log thousands of daily updates on the movement of traffic cones in a three-square-mile pilot area in downtown Las Vegas. The technology helps measure the effects of cones on traffic, automate the flow of data into RTC databases, determine permit compliance with lane closures, streamline construction permit management, and provide more accurate public information.

28 Data Collection and Management Plan

Figure ~: Dashboard Camera with Artificial Intelligence and Internet Connectivity

iCone has had 21 traffic control devices broadcasting their locations from

inside work zones to the traveling public through the Waze traffic app. The HAAS Alert system is also being tested on RTC inspection and traffic technician vehicles to report to Waze the location of construction vehicles, equipment and workers within active construction zones.

29 Scope of Analysis

Analytical Results Congestion analysis answers the following questions: What congestion

problems are present in the region, or are anticipated? What are the sources of unacceptable congestion?

Scope of Analysis The distribution of traffic on all functional classifications throughout the week

and day is demonstrated in Figure ~ (blue line and right axis - average speed, red line and left axis - total number of congested segments). Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday have more congestion than other days of the week with evening peaks being more intense than morning peaks. In general, the mid-day off-peak period does not experience a significant increase in speeds compared to the morning peak and congestion starts to rise in the afternoon.

Figure ~: Yearly Distribution of Traffic by Day of Week and Time of Day Based on the distribution of regional congestion, this analysis focuses only on

measurements taken Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday between the hours of 7 -9 AM and 4-6 PM. The data is summarized into 6 two months sequential groupings of the calendar year (e.g. January & February).

System-wide Overview The first level of analysis is system wide. Adding to regional performance

metrics above, Maps ~ and ~ provide a regional snapshot of congestion. A travel time index greater than 1.5 is considered severely congested. Another level of analysis is to analyze specific corridors (see Appendix A).

30 Analytical Results

Map ~: Morning Peak Travel Time Index by TMC, March – April 2018

31 System-wide Overview

Map ~: Afternoon Peak Travel Time Index by TMC, March – April 2018

32 Analytical Results

Bottleneck Analysis As illustrated in Figure ~, bottlenecks are identified by comparing the

reported speed to the reference speed for each segment of road. When reported speed falls below 60% of the reference speed, the road segment is flagged as a potential bottleneck. If bottleneck conditions persist for five minutes, the bottleneck is confirmed. Adjacent road segments also experiencing congestion are joined together to form a queue. When conditions have recovered for 10 minutes the bottleneck is considered clear. The duration of a bottleneck is the difference between the time when the congestion was first identified and the time when the congestion recovered.

Figure ~: INRIX Bottleneck Definition

Bottleneck Severity Metrics INRIX aggregates bottleneck occurrences, ranks bottleneck locations

and summarizes maximum queue length, average duration and total duration. In addition, their methodology produces the following metrics:

o Base Impact — the sum of queue lengths over the duration of the

bottleneck. o Speed Differential — Base impact weighted by the difference

between free-flow speed and observed speed. o Congestion — Base impact weighted by the measured speed as a

percentage of free-flow speed. o Total Delay — Base impact weighted by the difference between free-

flow travel time and observed travel time multiplied by the average daily volume (AADT), adjusted by a day-of-the-week factor.

33 Bottleneck Analysis

The Most Impactful Urban Bottlenecks of 2018 Of the four bottleneck severity metrics listed above the congestion

metric was chosen to rank bottleneck locations. Again, the congestion metric is the aggregated sum of queue lengths over the duration of the bottleneck weighted by the measured speed as a percentage of free-flow speed. While the raw number produced using this metric isn’t

intuitively meaningful, it does provide a scale from which to judge the relative severity of bottleneck locations.

Based upon their ranking, the most persistent and impactful and bottlenecks of the year are described with calendar heat charts, time spiral diagrams, maximum length queue maps.

Calendar heat charts are an excellent way to depict when bottleneck conditions occur most often. They are particularly useful for identifying patterns of bottleneck formation.

Time Spirals emphasize bottleneck duration. The radial lines on time spiral diagrams represent one hour of the day with midnight at the top and noon at the bottom. The color of the arcing lines represent the max length of that bottleneck’s queue in miles. The length and placement of the lines designates when a bottleneck at that location was observed. For annual time spirals, January 1st is at the center and December 31st is at the perimeter.

Mapped bottleneck queues are useful for illustrating where bottleneck congestion occurs. Road segments are shaded according to the number of days that maximum queue lengths affected their location. Unfortunately, specific bottleneck head locations can only by approximated using this methodology.

While not fully described in this section, the following bottleneck locations were very impactful, but had been largely resolved in the month of October. The alleviation of congestion at these locations can be partially attributed to the lifting of construction related lane closures. The following bottleneck head locations had an annual congestion metric of 570,411, 340,601 and 150,147, respectively.

o I-15 S @ Charleston Blvd/Exit 41 o I-15 N @ Sahara Ave/Exit 40 o I-15 S @ D St/Exit 43

Appendix A provides additional information on the most congested corridors

in the Las Vegas Valley.

34 Analytical Results

I-15 N @ Wilber Clark/West Desert Inn Road Annual Congestion Score: 662,225

In 2018, bottleneck occurrences at the approximate location depicted on Map ~ had an average maximum length of 3.02 miles and average daily duration of 5.23 hours. As indicated by Figure ~, bottlenecks occurred most often between the hours of 2 pm and 7 pm. According to Figure ~, bottlenecks caused the most severe congestion during the months of March and April. Figure ~ indicates that weekday bottleneck occurrences beginning in the 1 and 2 o’clock hours cause the most congestion.

Figure ~: 2018 Bottleneck Congestion Metric on I-15 N @ Wilber Clark/West Desert Inn Road aggregated by Month and Day of Month

Figure ~: 2018 Bottleneck Congestion Metric on I-15 N @ Wilber Clark/West Desert Inn Road aggregated by Day of Week and Hour of Day

35 Bottleneck Analysis

Map ~: Approximate Bottleneck Head and Queue at Max Length on I-15 N @

Wilber Clark/West Desert Inn Road

Figure ~: 2018 Time Spiral of Bottleneck Occurrences on I-15 N @ Wilber Clark/West Desert Inn Road

36 Analytical Results

I-515 N @ Casino Center Blvd/Exit 75 Annual Congestion Score: 158,730

In 2018, bottleneck occurrences at the approximate location depicted on Map ~ had an average maximum length of 2.53 miles and average daily duration of 1.75 hours. As indicated by Figure ~, bottlenecks occurred most often between the hours of 2 pm and 7 pm. According to Figure ~, bottlenecks caused the most severe congestion during the months of September and October. Figure ~ indicates that weekday bottleneck occurrences beginning between 2 and 5 o’clock cause the most congestion.

Figure ~: 2018 Bottleneck Congestion Metric on I-515 N @ Casino Center Blvd/Exit 75 aggregated by Month and Day of Month

Figure ~: 2018 Bottleneck Congestion Metric on I-515 N @ Casino Center Blvd/Exit 75 aggregated by Day of Week and Hour of Day

37 Bottleneck Analysis

Map ~: Approximate Bottleneck Head and Queue at Max Length on I-515 N

@ Casino Center Blvd/Exit 75

Figure ~: 2018 Time Spiral of Bottleneck Occurrences on I-515 N @ Casino Center Blvd/Exit 75

38 Analytical Results

I-215 W @ Decatur Blvd/Exit 11 Annual Congestion Score: 155,932

In 2018, bottleneck occurrences at the approximate location depicted on Map ~ had an average maximum length of 1.88 miles and average daily duration of 2.27 hours. As indicated by Figure ~, bottlenecks occurred most often between the hours of 3 pm and 7 pm. According to Figure ~, Bottlenecks caused the most severe congestion during the months of September and October. Figure ~ indicates that weekday bottleneck occurrences beginning between 4 and 6 o’clock cause the most congestion.

Figure ~: 2018 Bottleneck Congestion Metric on I-215 W @ Decatur Blvd/Exit 11 aggregated by Month and Day of Month

Figure ~: 2018 Bottleneck Congestion Metric on I-215 W @ Decatur Blvd/Exit 11 aggregated by Day of Week and Hour of Day

39 Bottleneck Analysis

Map ~: Approximate Bottleneck Head and Queue at Max Length on I-215 W

@ Decatur Blvd/Exit 11

Figure ~: 2018 Time Spiral of Bottleneck Occurrences on I-215 W @ Decatur Blvd/Exit 11

40 Analytical Results

CMP Dashboard Integration of travel speeds and other sources of

data into a GIS dashboard provides an accessible starting point for more detailed research into the causes behind specific patterns of congestion. As viewed in Figure ~, the CMP dashboard is an interactive web application configured using Operations Dashboard for ArcGIS Online. Its purpose is to provide a publicly accessible history of past performance and attempts to associate variables impacting congestion.

Variables Impacting Congestion The following are variables which are generally accepted by transportation professionals to have a logical association with congestion. In its current state, the dashboard: o Focuses on seasonal traffic variation of peak hour work trips. o Visualizes intensity of employment trip generators (only at large scales) o Displays incidents (a common cause of non-recurring congestion).

Locations of Major Trip Generators In order to understand congestion issues

related to specific locations, it is often beneficial to have a knowledge of major trip generators and the typical traffic patterns, users, and times of high demand at these locations.

Seasonal Traffic Variations Traffic patterns can vary greatly due to seasonal changes in school-

related trips, tourist/resort activity, farming and farm equipment activity, weather conditions, and daylight conditions. When possible, data should be collected at times that will account for these variations.

Time-of-day Traffic Variations Not all locations experience their highest demand during typical peak

periods, especially in areas with heavy school traffic (which often coincides with the morning peak, but has an earlier afternoon peak) or in areas with large employers with shift change times outside the typical peak period.

Work Trips vs. Non-work Trips To the extent possible, it is helpful to understand the balance between

work-related trips and non-work trips within an area, as the strategies to address these different trip types may differ.

41 CMP Dashboard

Non-Recurring Congestion Variation Crash data can identify corridors or intersections with a high frequency of

crashes that cause non-recurring congestion. Safety improvements reduce potential harm and can also reduce congestion.

Web Application What is displayed on the dashboard is dictated by the current selection

described at the top of the page inside of the header. To avoid overcrowding the header, a high resolution screen (i.e. >=1080p or reducing zoom) and a modern browser other than Internet Explorer (e.g. Edge, Chrome, or Firefox) are recommended.

Dashboard URL: https://arcg.is/0ejyei0

On the dashboard, an indicator known as travel time index indicates intensity

of congestion. A travel time index greater than 1.5 is considered severely congested.

Important outcomes of the CMP Dashboard are the bottleneck and performance rankings. Bottlenecks are ranked from the most impactful to the least impactful in terms of congestion. Segments are ranked from most to least congested by travel time index. Segment rankings are easily generated between different segments, the same segment(s) at different seasons, or both. Each observation within the rankings are dynamically paired with a time series chart to track their performance overtime.

Using the current methodology, twelve summaries (6 for the AM peak /6 for the PM peak) of the average congestion behavior of every segment are created every calendar year. This makes it particular suited for investigations into seasonal variation of commuter traffic over time. Using the dashboard makes it relatively intuitive to identify variables impacting congestion and to retroactively evaluate implemented congestion management strategies.

42 Strategy Toolbox

Strategy Toolbox This action of the CMP identifies and evaluates

strategies intended to manage congestion. This toolbox of strategies is presented to help policy makers and planners select effective congestion management strategies.

Strategy Tiers As illustrated in Figure ~, The CMP uses

thematically tiered strategies. Following an approach used by other MPOs and promoted by FHWA, the tiers are arranged so measures at the top take precedence over those at the bottom.

Figure ~: Congestion Management Strategy Tiers

43 Strategy Tiers

Strategy Tier 1: Reduce Person Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled

Travel Demand Management (TDM) can help to provide travelers with more options and reduce the number of vehicles or trips during congested periods. Figure ~ illustrates the economic results of reduced demand. Unlike Figure ~, these strategies are not anticipated to reduce net demand in rapidly growing Southern Nevada. Rather, these strategies introduce a mitigating influence whose benefits become significant when accumulated overtime.

Figure ~: Generalized Effect of Dissuaded Demand on Transportation Infrastructure, Construction and Maintenance

Work Patterns o Flex time allows an employee to start and end their workday outside of the

general commuting periods. o Staggered hours have different work schedules for employees in different

work groups.

44 Strategy Toolbox

o Compressed work weeks reduce the number of work days per week, while lengthening the work day.

o Telecommuting allows employees to work at home or at a regional center instead of going into a central office.

Promoting Alternatives Programs that encourage transit use and

ridesharing, such as marketing/outreach for TDM services.

Congestion Pricing o High occupancy toll (HOT) lanes o Pricing fees for parking spaces by the number of persons in the vehicle and

the time of day or location o Pricing fees for the use of travel lanes by the number of persons in the vehicle

and the time of day

Land Uses o Land use controls that support mixed use development. o Growth management restrictions such as urban growth boundaries o Incentives for High-density development, such as tax incentives o Development policies that support transit-oriented designs for corridors and

communities involving homes, jobsites, and shops. As conceptually illustrated in Figure ~, TDM friendly neighborhoods have high intra-connectivity.

Figure ~: Generalized Rural-Urban Land Use TransectsIV

45 Strategy Tiers

Strategy Tier 2: Shift Automobile Trips to Other Modes Improving transit operations, improving access to transit, and expanding

transit service can help reduce the number of vehicles on the road by making transit more attractive or accessible. These strategies may be closely linked to strategies in the previous tier. A freight example in this tier would be to Increase intercity freight rail capacity to reduce truck traffic volumes on highways.

Make Transit Services More Appealing to More People These strategies add new vehicles or expand

transit services. They are guided by service demands and also fiscal constraints. o Increasing bus route coverage or frequencies:

This strategy provides better accessibility to transit to a greater share of the population. Increasing frequency makes transit more attractive to use.

o Providing real-time information on transit routes: The RTC already provides real time information on bus location and projected arrival times. The release of a customized app for smart phones provides access to tracking information, schedules and fare purchases.

o Providing exclusive bus right-of-way: Exclusive right-of-way includes bus ways, bus-only lanes, and bus bypass ramps. The RTC already has some dedicated corridors along South Grand Central Parkway, Casino Center Boulevard and dedicated shoulder lanes on west Sahara Avenue. This will continue to be considered as an option for future projects.

Make Active Transportation More Appealing to More People o New sidewalk connections: Sidewalk connectivity

encourages people to walk for short trips as opposed to driving.

o Bicycle Lane Network: There are at least 80 miles of designated bicycle routes, 100 miles of designated bicycle paths and 180 miles of bicycle lanes on streets in the Las Vegas Valley. Efforts are underway to increase the availability of facilities in our region as well as implement the bike sharing program in downtown Las Vegas.

o Increasing Safety for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities: Safety can be increased through implementing modifications deemed appropriate for the circumstances. These can include additional lighting, signage, traffic control devices, improving pavement and sidewalk surface, bulb-out curbs at intersections and raised crosswalks.

o Complete Streets: Designing a corridor to enable safer access for all potential users.

46 Strategy Toolbox

Strategy Tier 3: Strategies to Improve Roadway Operations

These strategies focus on getting more out of what we have rather than building new infrastructure. Many of these operations-based strategies are supported by the use of enhanced technologies or Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).

Incident Management Vehicular crash statistics can be utilized to identify corridors or

intersections with a high frequency of crashes that cause non-recurring congestion. Safety improvements at these locations can reduce not only harm to individuals, but also congestion. The Nevada Strategic Highway Safety Plan outlines numerous safety improvement actions for a variety of circumstances.

Additionally, it is important to monitor the cumulative time it takes to clear vehicles and debris from a crash scene to allow traffic to flow again. Southern Nevada FAST has established agreements with emergency services and towing companies regarding time benchmarks for crash clearance on the regional freeway system.

Traffic Signal Coordination The Southern Nevada FAST center already has

many arterial corridors linked to their control center by fiber optic line to allow for oversight and adjustment of signalized intersections. Signals can be set to run on different pre-timed plans or to run based on actuation from specific events, such as the arrival of a

vehicle, a transit bus, a pedestrian or an emergency vehicle. The phasing plans can be optimized for ongoing

conditions.

Advanced Traveler Information Systems An Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) is any system that

acquires, analyzes, and presents information to assist freeway travelers in moving from a starting location (origin) to their desired destination. Relevant information may include locations of incidents, weather and road conditions, optimal routes, recommended speeds, and lane restrictions.

47 Strategy Tiers

Strategy Tier 4: Add Capacity These strategies involve the construction of new lanes for vehicular

traffic. Selecting from this tier should be preceded by considering the applicability of demand management measures from the three tiers listed earlier. Capacity adding strategies should be considered only after the demand management options have been deemed

unfeasible.

Bottleneck Removal This strategy is aimed at correcting short segments

of roadway which have temporary lane reductions or other design limitations that cause physical capacity to be limited. As heavier flows of upstream traffic arrive at the bottleneck point, vehicles can back up due to the sudden constriction.

Channelization This separates turning traffic from the through lanes at intersections. This can

take the form of lane markings or in some instances concrete islands. Pedestrian safety needs to be considered if placing right turn channels.

Intersection Improvements Intersections can be widened and lanes re-striped to increase capacity as

well as safety. Elements of this may include the construction of left (and/or right) turn lane(s), widening the shoulders, or applying changes to the traffic control.

New Travel Lanes Added Along an Existing Roadway This will provide increased capacity and reduce congestion

and travel delays for existing levels of traffic. It could also result in less traffic on parallel side streets and arterials as vehicles divert to the widened road. However, the cost of construction could be high depending on the amount of right of way needed and impediments.

Extended Roadway This is a new road along a separate right of way to

serve newly developed or developing areas or an extension of an existing roadway to complete a network. It is applicable to areas experiencing new development or relieving an existing severely congested corridor. Cost depends on the amount of right‐of‐way needed and the scale of construction impediments.

48 Implementation Plan

Implementation Plan As the Las Vegas Valley’s population continues to

increase, so too does traffic congestion. The RTC identifies and implements both short and long-term policies and programs intended to promote air quality improvement, enhance mobility and increase quality of life in the region. The CMP Implementation Plan selects funding and congestion management strategies that combine to realize a desired end result.

Congestion Management Funding RTP projects can be funded by any of the following means: 1. Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funding (CMAQ) 2. Surface Transportation Program (STP) 3. Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 4. Other Funding Options

Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program

The CMAQ Program was created under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Subsequently, it has been reauthorized under each of the following federal transportation bills. The CMAQ program supports two goals of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT): improving air quality and relieving congestion. The CMAQ program provides funding for a broad array of projects that accomplish these goals. By distributing funds toward CMAQ projects, state and local governments can improve air quality, make progress towards achieving attainment status and ensure compliance with the transportation conformity provisions of the Clean Air Act. RTC often utilizes local jurisdiction funds combined with CMAQ funds to fund congestion management projects.

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Project Selection The FHWA mandates that projects be prioritized based on the cost

effectiveness of emission reductions. This mandate was strengthened with the passage and implementation of MAP-21. During the project selection process, projects are evaluated based on their cost effectiveness. Priority consideration is given to those projects which result in the most emissions reductions for the least amount of CMAQ funds expended.

49 Congestion Management Funding

There are seven different types of CMAQ projects implemented by local agencies in Clark County:

1. Intersection modifications, including HOV direct connections from freeways

2. Bicycle lane and pedestrian improvements 3. ITS improvements that focus on improved signal coordination resulting in

an increase in travel speed and a reduction in idle delay. 4. Installation of bus turnouts in places where transit vehicles use general

purpose travel lanes to board and alight passengers; 5. Purchase of electric vehicles (EV) or installation of EV charging stations 2. Transportation Demand Management; 3. Electric and natural gas vehicle purchases. ITS, TDM, bicycle and pedestrian projects, and intersection modifications are

generally among the most cost effective projects. In table ~, the 2015-2019 TIP for the RTC shows the following amounts of expenditure using CMAQ funds. The total amount represents about 5% of all programmed expenditures outlined in the TIP for this period.

Fiscal Year Programmed CMAQ Funds 2015 $19,831,726 2016 $25,653,110 2017 $18,384,711 2018 $20,725,000

Total Programmed CMAQ Funds for 2015-2019 $89,594,547

All Programmed Funds for 2015-2019 $1,827,838,953

Table ~: RTC CMAQ funding for 2015-2019

50 Implementation Plan

Congestion Management Strategies Implementing a broad array of congestion management strategies in

Southern Nevada is valuable in light of the following: o Many corridors in the Las Vegas region have been built out to their

maximum number of travel lanes o Funding limits the number of large scale projects that can be planned

and constructed o This decade, Clark County is among the top ten counties in the nation

in terms of numeric population growth. Given RTC’s maturity and scope of services, many congestion

management strategies are already being implemented on an ongoing basis.

Strategy Tier 1: Reduce Person Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled

The RTC supports the creation of a more sustainable transportation system

through initiatives that implement transportation demand management strategies. TDM reduces traffic congestion, improves air quality and mobility, encourages the use of commute alternatives and ultimately creates a more sustainable community.

Club Ride The RTC has a vigorous TDM program called Club

Ride Commuter Services. Established thirteen years ago, Club Ride has developed a successful regional trip reduction program by targeting their message to large employers and their employees. The Club Ride program works with both groups to establish customized commute option program which incentivize use of alternative modes of transportation for getting to and from work, such as transit, carpooling, van pooling, bicycling or walking. In 2014, Club Ride had 271 participating employers and 18,143 active registrants.

Elements of the Club Ride program have included: 1. Computerized Rideshare Matching 2. E-Z Rider Discounted Transit Passes 3. Club Ride Rewards Program 4. Guaranteed Emergency Ride Home 5. Preferential parking for carpool commuting employee 6. Vanpool subsidies

51 Congestion Management Strategies

Park and Ride The RTC also offers parking spaces at three of its four transit bus transfer

centers (Centennial Hills, Westcliff and South Strip Transfer Terminal) for commuters to use. Centennial Hills has a significant number of commuters parking there and using vanpools to commute daily to Creech Air Force Base located 30 miles to the northwest. South Strip Transfer Terminal sees the heaviest use of its parking facilities on weekends by people traveling out of nearby McCarran International Airport. The RTC partners with retail locations throughout the valley to offer additional park and ride options that may be closer to residential homes. These retail sites have “donated” a certain number of parking

spots within the lot that have been marked with RTC Park & Ride signage.

High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes HOV lanes are dedicated lanes to be used

exclusively by vehicles with two or more people. FHWA’s Manual on Universal Traffic Control Devices

denotes these preferential lanes with a white diamond. Motorcycles, Emergency vehicles responding to an emergency and public transit may also travel in HOV lanes. Trucks (vehicles with more than two axles) may not travel in HOV lanes.

HOV lanes can reduce peak-period travel time compared to general-purpose lanes and can move substantially more commuters than general-purpose lanes during peak demand periods. HOV lane users experience less congestion, arriving at their destinations more quickly than those who do not carpool. It also costs less to ride a bus or to share a ride than to drive alone every day. Other benefits include a more reliable commute and less stress. The community also benefits. HOV lanes provide a better use of infrastructure and can serve more people than general-purpose lanes.

Initially, HOV lanes were constructed on U.S. 95 from Ann Road to the Spaghetti Bowl. Project NEON converted an existing I-15 express lane to a HOV lane, constructed a new HOV interchange and added a direct connector between I-15 and US 95, In 2018, NDOT reevaluated Southern Nevada’s High

Occupancy Vehicle system utilizing RTC’s 2040 Regional Travel Demand Model

with the Mode Choice Element. Based on their application of the model, NDOT proposed the long-term HOV system depicted in Figure ~.

52 Implementation Plan

Figure ~: Proposed Long-Term HOV SystemV

53 Congestion Management Strategies

Transit Oriented Development Transit-oriented development (TOD) is a development pattern that

incorporates a mix of residential and commercial buildings near high capacity transit. In comparison to traditional development patterns, TOD development inherently reduces person trips and vehicle miles traveled. RTC and the City of Las Vegas are the recipients of a $300,000 grant from the FTA to develop a TOD plan for Maryland Parkway. The funds are made available through FTA’s Pilot

Program for TOD Planning, which assists communities developing new or expanded mass transit systems. The TOD plan will evaluate development opportunities near transit stops along Maryland Parkway from Sahara Avenue through downtown Las Vegas to the Medical District. Figure ~ illustrates many of the activity centers located along the 8.7 mile transit corridor.

Figure ~: Stylized Maryland Parkway Corridor The RTC is finalizing an environmental assessment so that RTC may begin to

pursue federal funding opportunities for Bus Rapid Transit on the busy Maryland Parkway corridor. The new service would debut as early as 2024.

As conceptualized in Figure ~, the BRT will operate similar to a light rail system with enhanced passenger amenities and dedicated transit lanes along most of the route but with the lower cost and flexibility of a bus. Separated bike lanes are proposed on each side of the street behind the curb and at the same elevation as the sidewalk, giving bicyclists their own space and providing a buffer for pedestrians. The enhancements would take place on Maryland Parkway between Russell Road and Carson Avenue in downtown Las Vegas, with an extension to the Las Vegas Medical District and UNLV School of Medicine.

Figure ~: Bus Rapid Transit Rendering

54 Implementation Plan

Livable Centers RTC’s livable centers pilot program incentivizes

local jurisdictions to re-envision neighborhoods as vibrant, walkable communities that offer increased mobility options, encourage healthy lifestyles and provide improved access to jobs and services. This is accomplished through jurisdictionally led Livable Centers Studies. Study recommendations become eligible for inclusion in the RTP.

Southern Nevada Strong provides guidance for the creation of livable centers including the following objectives: o Develop and expand community-based economic development and

reinvestment to support vibrant transit-supported mixed-use districts throughout the region;

o Develop housing and employment in mixed-use transit-oriented neighborhoods near job centers, schools and other services; and

o Integrate future land use planning with existing and future transportation improvements. Development guided by livable center studies will be more conducive for

reducing person trips and vehicle mile traveled than conventional development. The amount of benefit gained and cost avoided by developing livable centers becomes especially significant when aggregated in perpetuity. The Deer Springs Livable Centers Study is underway in The City of North Las Vegas. Figure ~ defines their study area and envisions an extension to an existing transit line.

Figure ~: Deer Springs Livable Centers Study Area

55 Congestion Management Strategies

Strategy Tier 2: Shift Automobile Trips to Other Modes

A major challenge facing RTC is to make alternative modes of transportation

safer and more attractive to a wider range of people.

Improving Fixed Route Transit Service The two primary needs that must be met to make progress on this objective

are to make transit rides considerably faster and also to make the experience of riding transit more enjoyable.

Bus Route Coverage and Frequency

Increasing coverage provides better accessibility to transit to a greater share of the population. Increasing frequency makes transit more attractive to use. RTC’s Service Performance & Capacity Standards provide an objective framework evaluating RTC’s transit service. Boardings per revenue hour and average peak load are measurements used to evaluate each transit route’s

efficiency and capacity. Based on these measurements, routes are flagged as underperforming, overperforming, or overcapacity and adjusted appropriately. Regular evaluation of bus routes in this manner is a vital task in ensuring that limited resources are used as effectively and equitably as possible. Figure ~ is a sample of how bus routes are symbolized on the official system map.

Figure ~: Transit System Map Symbology

Express Bus Routes Length of trip time has an effect in determining mode choice for individuals

electing between driving and using transit. The RTC has established several express routes as overlays to the existing conventional route network. Express routes differentiate themselves from conventional routes in that they typically travel on higher speed roadways and make fewer stops. A key for reducing express bus trip times is routing them in corridors where they can operate in relatively uncongested right of way. To that end dedicated bus lanes are located on the roadway shoulder in each direction of West Sahara Avenue and also in the median of Grand Central Parkway and Casino Center Boulevard. RTC buses also make use of HOV lanes.

56 Implementation Plan

Transit App

RTC partnered with Transit in 2016 for the trip planning portion of the rideRTC app. The app also provides real time information on bus location and projected arrival times. In 2018, Transit expanded its functionality by debuting a feature that makes it easier for users to make informed transportation decisions based on flexibility and cost. Using the app’s

interface in Figure ~, Transit users can plan, book, and pay for a ride from either Uber or Lyft, while getting real-time updates on their RTC connection—

all in one app. This feature reduces waiting times and allows customers to compare options for connecting to transit. The app promotes ride hail as a vital first and last mile link which reduces congestion and makes it feasible to get around without your own car.

Figure ~: Transit App User Interface

In the near future, Transit’s multimodal trip planner will also begin

suggesting trips that combine transit with options to take short trips, like RTC bike share.

Bus Stop Transfers

Transit Administration and Operations estimates that 60 percent of all RTC bus commuters utilize less than 10 percent of bus stops in the system. These heavily used bus stops are typically in areas where there are very busy trip destinations or transfer destinations. If transfers are necessary between bus lines, it often requires that bicyclists and pedestrians disembark on foot and cross over street intersections that are busy and congested. Thus attention needs to be given not only to improving the aesthetic quality of bus stops but

57 Congestion Management Strategies

also the convenience and safety of their adjacent sidewalks and crosswalk facilities.

The Bonneville Transit Terminal located in Downtown Las Vegas provides a safe opportunity to transfer between many routes. Diagramed in Figure ~, the facility features 16 on-site vehicle bays, approximately 100 double-stacked bike racks, and a self-service bike repair station.

Figure ~ Boneville Transit Center Diagram

RTC makes additional efforts to accommodate transit user needs specific to Las Vegas. RTC’s annual Summer Heat campaign is made possible by forming partnerships with local businesses and organizations. Donated water and sunscreen, as well as Lyft discounts, help riders stay cool and protected at or on their way to transit centers and busy bus stops. Transit Ambassadors along Las Vegas Boulevard answer questions for transit riders who may be new or otherwise have a question about transit.

58 Implementation Plan

Smartphone Friendly Transit More than 70 percent of RTC transit customers use

smartphones which have access to internet directly over their cellar network or via complementary WIFI provided inside RTC buses, transit centers, and park and rides. Since launching in 2016, the rideRTC app has been downloaded over 200,000 times. The app allows users to easily buy and use transit passes from their smartphone. Improving the quality and all-inclusiveness of the app is an important strategy for attracting more transit users. In pursuit of this strategy, Users can now access Transit+, an enhanced trip planning tool that incorporates rideshare options, and Transit Watch, a security feature that allows riders to report transit-related offenses and suspicious activity.

Transit Watch

The Transit Watch app developed by The Brass Star Group enables passengers to report non-emergency incidents such as transit-related offenses, suspicious activity and safety issues. Reports from the app go directly to the RTC security’s contractor dispatch center, which reviews

the submissions and directs them to the appropriate agency, such as the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. This service allows those with concerns about using transit to have confidence that it will be a safe and comfortable experience.

Active Transportation Friendly Streets There are many challenges faced by pedestrians attempting to navigate

roadways, cross at intersections, or access the transit system in the Las Vegas Valley. To test out possible solutions, RTC has recently lead temporary low-cost demonstration (i.e. tactical urbanism) projects that increase pedestrian comfort to better understand their potential success. Permanently applying street treatments, like that depicted in Figure ~, would increase bicyclist and pedestrian comfort and safety which would encourage people to choose active modes of transportation.

59 Congestion Management Strategies

Figure ~: Temporary Sidewalk Extension at Cambridge St. and Katie Ave.

Complete Streets Since 2012, RTC has had a complete streets policy. Complete Streets are

roadways designed to safely and comfortably accommodate all users, regardless of age, ability or mode of transportation. A Complete Street roadway typically includes sidewalks and sidewalk amenities, transit shelters and amenities whenever there is a route along the corridor, and provisions for bicycle facilities where appropriate while maintaining its principle function. These elements attract a greater diversity of modes to the facility.

The policy will allow the implementing entities to incorporate the subsequently adopted “Complete Streets Design Guidelines for Livable

Communities” into all phases of development and redevelopment whenever

possible. The following five areas are identified as strategic points of public agency intervention:

o Long-Range Community Visioning and Goal Setting o Local Agency Plans o Policies and Standards o Coordination with Private Development o Investment in Public Streets

Bike Share

Since 2016, RTC Bike Share has provided an easy way for residents and tourists to ride to and from the many attractions, restaurants, bars and shops that the City of Las Vegas downtown area has to offer. Bike share users can also easily connect to the numerous RTC transit lines through the Bonneville Transit Center. There are 21 stations and 180 bikes currently in service. In two years’ time, the bike share program has shifted over 100,000 miles

of travel from other modes. Providing an option for electric bicycles has increased its appeal to more users.

60 Implementation Plan

Strategy Tier 3: Improve Roadway Operations

As described earlier, the Freeways and Arterials System of Transportation has an extensive amount of ITS equipment and technology deployed in the field along the regional freeway corridors and at many arterial signalized intersections. These systems have many components, including vehicle sensors, electronic variable message board signs, streaming video cameras, controls, and communication technologies. ITS strategies are sets of components working together to provide information and allow greater control and operation.

Traffic Incident Management Traffic Incident Management in Nevada is a

partnership between the Department of Public Safety, NDOT, fire, EMS, police, environmental agencies, the towing and recovery industry, and the media. These partners have formed multi-disciplinary TIM coalitions to facilitate the planned and coordinated process to detect, respond, and clear traffic incidents so traffic flow may be restored as safely and as quickly as possible.

The Southern Nevada TIM Coalition was the first in Nevada and formed in January, 2008. The Southern TIM Coalition now includes hundreds of trained responders from a variety of agencies and disciplines in the region who meet bimonthly to implement safe, quick clearance policies that support coordinated and cohesive management of traffic during a crash. In 2009, the coalition executed an Open Roads Agreement which formalized a commitment to re-open the roadway as soon as possible following a crash or traffic incident.

Response

FAST works closely with the NDOT Freeway Service Patrol by alerting them to incidences of disabled vehicles observed through the monitoring system. The Freeway Service Patrol provides free assistance during incidents to improve safety and reduce delay. When the Patrol responds to non-emergency incidents, these incidents are cleared more quickly as a result of their assistance. The deployment of the Freeway Service Patrol to non-emergency situations allows for emergency responders to be available for actual emergencies, rather than disabled vehicles.

I addition, FAST uses a software platform from Waycare, the leading provider of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven mobility solutions for smart cities. Waycare’s unique ability to report in real time the location of crashes by

61 Congestion Management Strategies

analyzing data from a variety of sources – including in-vehicle navigation devices, traffic detectors, Waze, INRIX and other telematics providers – enables faster validation and response to roadway incidents. Here in Southern Nevada, that equates to up to 12 minutes faster on average. This means faster treatment for those injured in crashes and the quicker clearance of incidents and restoration of normal traffic flow - ultimately, reducing the chance of secondary accidents and preventing millions of dollars in commerce-related delays.

Prevention

Waycare also enables predictive analytics to identify areas of roads at high risk for an incident and where dangerous driving conditions or congestion may occur. This allows law enforcement to proactively deploy traffic patrols and abatement efforts more efficiently with the goal of preventing incidents.

How it works: 1. Waycare’s platform uses in-vehicle information and municipal traffic data

to understand road conditions in real-time. 2. When it identifies an area at high-risk for an incident, Waycare alerts

traffic agencies when and where preventative action is required. 3. The RTC uses Dynamic Message Boards to deliver a preliminary warning,

alerting drivers to reduce speed and drive cautiously. 4. NHP proactively positions its vehicles in high-visibility mode along the

freeway in conjunction with NDOT who assure safety barriers are in place for the police officers on freeways.

Implementing this strategy during a crash prevention pilot program reduced

the number of primary crashes by 17 percent on I-15 in Southern Nevada. During the program, 91 percent of drivers traveling over 65 MPH reduced their speed to below 65 MPH in the area where preventative measures were deployed. These results are a clear signal that AI and deep learning can have a dramatic impact on improving the safety of even our busiest and most at-risk freeways.

Given the success of the system, the RTC broadened its partnership with Waycare in early 2019 to acquire in-vehicle, connected data from a minimum of 3,000 vehicles that will significantly enhance the results of the current Waycare projects and introduce additional uses. In October of 2019, the National Safety Council awarded a Road to Zero (RTZ) grant to build five new Strategic Traffic Management Sites (STMS).

62 Implementation Plan

Traffic Signal Timing FAST has responsibility for programming and coordinating over 1,000 of

the approximately 1,200 signalized intersections in the Las Vegas Valley. Using a connection from a remote server to traffic signal controllers, data log enumerations (with 1/10th second resolution time-stamps) are retrieved and stored on a web server at the FAST Traffic Operations Center about every 15 minutes. FAST’s

extensive fiber optic network carries the roughly 11.4 megabytes of data generated by each signal every day. Software customized by FAST allows RTC staff to graph and display the data and provide the results on the FAST Signal Performance Metric website. This service is offered to the local entities for application to their traffic signal infrastructure.

Since this system’s implementation, traffic signal timing has been managed to reduce fuel consumption, incidence of traffic collisions, travel time, unnecessary stops and vehicular emissions.

Signal Performance Metrics

Signal performance metrics include approach volumes, approach speeds, split monitor, turning movement volume counts, approach delay, and arrivals on red. In addition to these metrics, Purdue Coordination Diagrams (PCDs) visualize the temporal relationship between the coordinated phase indications and vehicle arrivals on a cycle-by-cycle basis. Figure ~ is a sample PCD. The platoon ratio measure is a useful parameter for measuring the quality of progression. The formula first divides cycle length(s) by effective green time for movement(s). This is then multiplied by the proportion of all vehicles arriving during green. Ratios less than 1 are less favorable while ratios greater than 1 are more.VI

Figure ~: Sample Purdue Coordination DiagramVII

63 Congestion Management Strategies

Purdue Phase Termination Charts show how each phase terminates when it changes from green to red. As depicted in Figure ~ termination can occur by a gapout, a maxout / forceoff, or skip. A gapout means that not all of the programmed time was used. A maxout occurs during fully actuated (free) operations, while forceoff’s occur during coordination. Both a maxout and forceoff show that all the programmed time was used. A skip means that the phase was not active and did not turn on. Also shown are the pedestrian activations for each phase. This metric is useful for identifying movements where split time may need to be taken from some phases and given to other phases. This metric is also useful in identifying vehicle and pedestrian detection failure.

Figure ~: Sample Purdue Phase Termination ChartVIII Using signal timing metrics FAST is able to improve signal timing. As an

example, in August of 2019, signal timing work was performed on Charleston Blvd to fine-tune signal operations after the completion of Project Neon. Table ~ demonstrates the before and after traffic flow on the corridor from Rancho Drive to Las Vegas Boulevard.

Period Speed (mph)

Travel Time (s)

Stop% Stop Time (s)

Travel Time Index (TTI)

Planning Time Index (PTI)

Before 22.8 231 17.4% 73 2.04 2.35 After 31.1 165 3.6% 2 1.45 1.52 Difference% 36.2% -28.7% -79.1% -96.7% -28.7% -35.4%

Table ~: Charleston Blvd Signal Timing Work

64 Implementation Plan

Advanced Traveler Information Systems Nevadans and surface transportation users across the country

sardonically refer to traffic cone as the official state flower. The frustration encapsulated in this quip stems from not being forewarned of its existence or not knowing why a construction zone is in place. The RTC is committed to using technology to assist commuters impacted by construction zones and other sources of non-recurring congestion. As a result, Southern Nevada drivers have many tools at their disposal to help them plan a safe commute.

Before Driving

Since 2015, the goal of RTC’s Seeing Orange

campaign is to provide residents with information about the various construction projects occurring throughout the valley. More information about Seeing Orange can be found at SeeingOrangeNV.com. Travelers can also subscribe to freeway traffic alerts which offer up to the minute information regarding I-15, 215, and US-95 traffic incident reports. Within seconds, subscribers receive messages on their cell phones via email or text messaging.

While Driving

RTC’s data sharing partnership with Waze provides drivers with a succinct and thorough overview of current road conditions in Southern Nevada. Waze’s smart phone app is an effective way to arm residents with

information about current road conditions and construction projects. The app’s ability to forewarn and dynamically route motorists in real time makes it a great way to ease commutes around the valley. RTC is experimenting with emerging work zone detection and reporting technologies to further expand the utility of the Waze platform.

In 2019, 42 full-color displays known as active traffic management (ATM) signs will be operational. Figure ~ is a visualization of an ATM. These join more than 80 dynamic message and travel time signs in use on Las Vegas regional freeways. These electronic message signs provide motorists with information such as alternate route detour information, information on special events, potential hazards ahead or emergency closures. This has the effect of improving roadway operations by directing traffic and preventing crashes.

65 Congestion Management Strategies

Figure ~: FAST Managed Dynamic Message Signs

66 Implementation Plan

Strategy Tier 4: Add Capacity

Project NEON Project Neon is the largest public works

project in Nevada history. It entails a nearly $1 billion widening of 3.7 miles of Interstate 15 between Sahara Avenue and the “Spaghetti

Bowl” interchange in downtown Las Vegas. It’s

the busiest stretch of highway in Nevada with 300,000 vehicles daily, or one-tenth of the state population, seeing 25,000 lane changes an hour. Traffic through the corridor is expected to double by 2035.

As seen in Figure ~, it is nearing its completion. The complexities of the project influenced traffic patterns in different ways throughout construction.

Figure ~: Project Neon’s Timeline

67 Travel Demand Model Forecasts

Evaluate Effectiveness The primary goal of this action is to ensure that implemented strategies are

effective at addressing congestion as intended, and to make changes based on the findings as necessary. To evaluate effectiveness it’s best to take a closer

look at implemented congestion management strategies on a corridor by corridor basis. Five corridors are evaluated in detail in Appendix A.

Besides corridor evaluations, historical performance measures (see section on performance measures) can evaluate the aggregate effectiveness of regional congestion management investments relative to the past. As for anticipating the future effectiveness of planned congestion management investments, the RTC’s

travel demand model can be of use.

Travel Demand Model Forecasts As part of the process of developing the RTP, the

RTC relies on a sophisticated travel demand model to simulate future transportation conditions. The model is valuable for forecasting the ratio of estimated traffic volumes to transportation facility capacities. By Leveraging this capability, travel time bands representing outbound auto PM peak period travel times from a chosen central origin can be generated. To evaluate regional travel times, the centrally located Clark County Government Center was selected as a suitable origin point.

Maps ~ and ~ demonstrate differences in travel time outcomes based upon “No Build” and “Build” scenarios, respectively. Scenarios change the input parameters of a model simulation and vary its outputs. In this case, the size of the time bands are influenced by the exclusion (i.e. No Build Scenario) or inclusion (i.e. Build Scenario) of planned road network projects. As would be expected, loading increased future year traffic volumes onto a static “No Build” network causes the time bands to shrink. Through this exercise, the model emphasizes the anticipated effectiveness of implementing planned congestion management strategies to the regional road network.

There are limitations to using the travel demand model is this way. While it forecasts effectiveness, it doesn’t readily forecast cost effectiveness. There may be a more cost effective set of congestion management strategies to achieve the same transportation outcomes. In addition, while the model does account for transit activity, it isn’t as sensitive to the effects of other congestion mitigation activities. In particular, it struggles to account for technological changes which may occur between the present and future year. Nonetheless, it does provide an expectation of future traffic congestion given the assumption that current economic, transportation and land use patterns will largely remain the same in forthcoming decades.

68 Evaluate Effectiveness

Map ~: No Build Scenario—Modeled 2040 Demand with Existing Networks:

PM Peak Auto Time From TAZ 528 To All TAZs (County Building is located in TAZ

528)

69 Travel Demand Model Forecasts

Map ~: Build Scenario—Modeled 2040 Demand with 2040 Networks: PM

Peak Auto Time From TAZ 528 To All TAZs (County Building is located in TAZ 528)

70 Conclusion

Conclusion According to the INRIX 2018 Global Traffic Scorecard, Las Vegas ranks

exactly in the middle of a pack of 62 American metros ranging in size from Boston to Wichita. Las Vegas experiences levels of congestion comparable to El Paso, Texas (less than half the population on the U.S. side of the border) and Cleveland, Ohio (less tourist traffic). It is common to attribute the lack of traffic congestion to Vegas’ status as a 24/7 destination that doesn’t sleep. Traffic patterns associated with tourist activity and unusual work shifts may be distributing traffic over a broader range of time. Regardless of the strength of this effect, the region’s unique attributes cannot be seen as granting relative immunity to the high societal costs of congestion. In addition, it is difficult to estimate how poorly Las Vegas may have been otherwise ranked were it not for past and ongoing congestion mitigation efforts.

Looking to the future, RTC has been proactively trying to innovate as the region continues to grow. This includes revamping the congestion management process report by improving its data collection and management plan, updating its implementation plan, and implementing a tool (i.e. the CMP Dashboard) which can track congestion related data overtime.

Ultimately, The CMP report outlines a multi-step process for making logically sound congestion management decisions (see Figure ~). It is a highly rigorous process that requires a great deal of time, communication and information to fully succeed. While it is impossible to achieve full consensus or to acquire complete knowledge of the consequences of every strategy alternative, it does provide an orderly path forward.

With this iteration of the CMP, the RTC attempted to create a robust resource that can be drawn upon by regional municipalities and committees to help inform wise transportation planning decisions. Applying this comprehensive, continuing, and cooperative CMP consistently to all of RTC’s

activities will increase the likelihood of arriving at a future end state that all Southern Nevadans can enjoy for generations to come.

71

72 Appendix A: Detailed Corridor Evaluations

Appendix A: Detailed Corridor Evaluations

Based on the ranking of peak period congestion found on the CMP Dashboard, the following key corridors averaged the

most congestion in the Las Vegas Valley in 2018: 1) I-15 2) US-95/I-515 3) CR-215/I-215

4) Rancho Drive 5) Martin L King Blvd

Each corridor evaluation features a proportional symbol map, a summary

table of segment performance, and a congestion scan. A proportional symbol map provides a quick reference to see the extent and relative intensity or congestion along a corridor. Performance data set in the table includes travel time index, planning time index, three year annual average change, and three year travel time index to planning time index ratio. These measurement definitions are discussed in depth in the performance measures section of this report. A congestion scan provides a color coded diagram of the location, duration, and intensity of congestion.

Finally, an explanation of the four dimensions of congestion is given for each corridor. The CMP dashboard served as valuable reference for looking up performance information. It was also help in crafting brief evaluations of the effectiveness of implemented strategies.

The Four Dimensions of Congestion 1. Extent: The number of system users or components (e.g. vehicles,

pedestrians, transit routes, and lane miles) affected by congestion, for example the proportion of system network components (roads, bus lines, etc.) that exceed a defined performance measure target.

2. Duration: The amount of time the congested conditions persist before returning to an uncongested state.

3. Intensity: The relative severity of congestion that affects travel. 4. Variability: The changes in congestion that occur on different days or

at different times of day. When congestion is highly variable due to non-recurring conditions, such as a roadway with a high number of traffic accidents causing delays, this has an impact on the utility of the system.

I-15

Interstate 15 runs along Las Vegas Valley’s central business districts and is the busiest stretch of highway in Nevada.

Extent:As shown on Map ~, Congestion on I-15 is concentrated between Lake

Mead Blvd and Tropicana Ave and roughly spans for 7.3 miles. Outside of the Las Vegas Valley, there is a significant level of Sunday congestion southbound at the California/Nevada border caused by tourists driving back to Southern California from Las Vegas.

Duration:As Figure ~ demonstrates, for the majority of 2018, parts of southbound

and northbound I-15 experienced congestion continuously from 7 AM to 7 PM. Areas near the strip experience congestion into the early morning. At the end of the year, congestion reverted back to a more traditional peak hour pattern.

Intensity:In general, Segments 4 and 5 are considered the most congested in Las

Vegas. Table ~ demonstrates that since 2016 average congestion in the months of March and May has worsened on southbound Segment 3 & 4 and northbound segment 4 & 5. During peak hours, it has not been uncommon for travel to take as much as three times longer than free flow conditions on the most congested segments.

Variability:The morning and evening congestion is distributed unevenly. The morning

peak affects mostly the southbound direction with congestion on the segment from Lake Mead Blvd to Charleston Blvd. As shown in Map ~, the northbound direction is more congested during the evening peak. At the same time, the southbound direction remains congested in the evening peak.

Inefficient configuration of exits caused a lot of weaving resulting in a high number of crashes, which is reflected in high planning time indexes listed in Table ~.

Strategy Effectiveness: Project Neon affected I-15 from March 2018 through the end of October

2018. Lane closures from Sahara Ave to Washington Ave in both directions formed many of the most impactful bottlenecks within the Urbanized Area. Construction impacted 3.7 miles of Interstate 15 from Sahara to the US 95 interchange. Following the lifting of construction related lane closures, congestion conditions improved in November and December.

Future CMP reports will analyze Project Neon’s long term effectiveness. In particular: What are the impacts to travel speeds? How closely do speedsmatch future traffic condition predictions? The predictions were: • For NB I-15 (from WB Spring Mountain on-ramp to the Spaghetti Bowl)

Average speeds on NB I-15 - 60 miles/hour • For US 95 SB at Rancho to I-15 SB at Sahara

Average speed - 56 miles/hour

Map~: I-15 Segments 3-5 Annual Travel Time Index

Table~: Corridor Performance By Segment along I-15 during March & May

I-15 Corridor By SegmentTravel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio Travel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio

16 17 18 X̅Δ 16 17 18 X̅Δ X̅ TTI/PTI 16 17 18 X̅Δ 16 17 18 X̅Δ X̅ TTI/PTIAM Peak Southbound AM Peak Northbound

1: N Las Vegas Blvd to CR-215 0.99 1 0.97 -0.01 0.99 1.02 1 0.01 0.98 0.99 1.01 0.96 -0.02 1.04 1.05 1.02 -0.01 0.952: CR-215 to Craig Rd 0.98 1.03 0.93 -0.03 1.02 1.06 0.97 -0.03 0.96 0.97 1.06 0.92 -0.03 1.01 1.07 0.98 -0.02 0.963: Craig Rd to Lake Mead Blvd 1.22 1.4 1.41 0.10 2.45 2.41 2.98 0.27 0.51 0.95 0.98 0.95 0.00 1.01 1.01 1.00 -0.01 0.954: Lake Mead Blvd to Charleston Blvd 2.47 2.47 2.93 0.23 4.82 3.84 4.97 0.07 0.58 0.97 1.30 1.03 0.03 1.02 2.20 1.13 0.05 0.765: Charleston Blvd to Tropicana Ave 1.05 1.06 0.99 -0.03 1.17 1.12 1.06 -0.05 0.93 1.03 1.09 2.46 0.72 1.11 1.65 3.74 1.32 0.706: Tropicana Ave to Blue Diamond 0.96 0.96 0.95 -0.01 1.02 1 1.01 -0.01 0.95 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.01 1.09 1.03 1.44 0.18 0.837: Blue Diamond Rd to St. Rose 0.96 0.97 0.97 0.01 1.02 1.01 1.02 0.00 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.97 -0.01 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.00 0.96

I-15 Corridor By Segment PM Peak Southbound PM Peak Nouthbound1: N Las Vegas Blvd to CR-215 0.98 0.99 0.95 -0.02 1.12 1.02 0.99 -0.07 0.93 1 1 0.96 -0.02 1.04 1.05 1.01 -0.02 0.952: CR-215 to Craig Rd 0.97 1.02 0.91 -0.03 1.01 1.06 0.97 -0.02 0.95 0.98 1.03 0.92 -0.03 1.02 1.06 0.97 -0.03 0.963: Craig Rd to Lake Mead Blvd 1.03 1.44 1.22 0.10 1.52 3.04 2.31 0.40 0.54 0.96 1.02 0.95 -0.01 1.01 1.03 1 -0.01 0.964: Lake Mead Blvd to Charleston Blvd 2.14 2.61 2.88 0.37 4.04 4.73 5.68 0.82 0.53 1.1 1.81 1.27 0.09 1.27 2.78 1.68 0.21 0.735: Charleston Blvd to Tropicana Ave 1.1 1.09 0.98 -0.06 1.26 1.24 1.07 -0.10 0.89 2.63 3.5 5.27 1.32 4.02 5.93 8.96 2.47 0.606: Tropicana Ave to Blue Diamond 0.96 0.96 0.92 -0.02 1.02 1 0.99 -0.02 0.94 1.06 1.02 1.09 0.02 1.74 1.07 1.71 -0.02 0.707: Blue Diamond Rd to St. Rose 0.96 0.96 0.95 -0.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.95

Figure~: 24 Hour (Tue., Wed., & Thu.) Six Season Congestion Scan along I-15 during 2018 by Travel Time Index. Traditional Peak Hours Delineated by Dotted Lines.

SB↓

NB↑

US-95/I-515

US-95/I-515 provide commuters with a convenient connection between communities in the valley. The southern terminus of I-515 connects into the first 15 miles of Interstate-11 which opened August 9, 2018.

Extent:As shown on Map ~, Congestion on US-95/I-515 spans roughly from

Decatur Ave through the Spaghetti Bowl to Boulder Hwy. Southbound US-95 from Craig Rd to W Lake Mead Blvd also experiences congestion.

Duration:Figure ~ shows that the traffic delays are present during both Morning and

Evening rush hours. Compared to the traditional peak hours, the PM peak on US-95/I-515 onsets earlier in the afternoon around 2:00 PM and persists later until about 7:00 PM.

Intensity:The volumes of traffic at the Spaghetti Bowl are reaching capacity during

morning and evening peaks with excessive weaving within the interchange and its approaches. This effect has been magnified by Project Neon. Figure ~ demonstrates that northbound I-515 consistently experiences weekday evening peak congestion that impacts upwards of 5 miles of roadway with delays occurring from the spaghetti bowl all the way down to the Boulder Hwy ramp.

Variability:Project Neon’s impact is best evidenced in 2017. In that year, Northbound

I-515 at Spaghetti Bowl observed travel time index as high as 5 during the evening peak. This variance is largely attributed to several interchange bridges being replaced which required the freeway to be reduced to two lanes in each direction between Rancho Drive and Las Vegas Blvd. In general, the northbound segments on US-95 tend to get a bit more congested during the evening rather than the morning peak, while the southbound I-515 receive much more congestion during the evening peak. The most impactful bottleneck locations and least reliable segments along this corridor surround its intersection with I-15. Table ~ marks the morning northbound approach to the spaghetti bowl as the least reliable segment along the corridor with an average TTI to PTI ratio of .43.

Strategy Effectiveness: The capacity constraints are going to be partially addressed by the Neon

Project with the increased capacity within the interchange and channeling of traffic using collectors along I-15 and direct HOV ramps from US-95 SB to I-15 SB / from I-15 NB to US-95 NB. As can be seen in table ~, southbound US-95 performance between Rancho Dr and Eastern Ave has significantly improved from year to year with the finalizing of road works on those segment.

Map~: US-95/I-515 Annual Travel Time Index

Table~: Corridor Performance By Segment along US-95/I-515 during March & May

US-95/I-515 Corridor By SegmentTravel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio Travel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio

16 17 18 X ̅Δ 16 17 18 X ̅Δ X ̅ TTI/PTI 16 17 18 X ̅Δ 16 17 18 X ̅Δ X ̅ TTI/PTIAM Peak Southbound AM Peak Northbound

1: Kyle Canyon Rd to CR-215 0.98 1.01 1.09 0.06 1.03 1.06 1.21 0.09 0.93 0.98 1.01 1.04 0.03 1.07 1.1 1.13 0.03 0.922: CR-215 to Craig Rd 0.99 1.04 1.01 0.01 1.21 1.14 1.3 0.05 0.83 0.95 1 0.98 0.02 1.02 1.06 1.03 0.01 0.943: Craig Rd to Lake Mead Blvd 1.35 1.36 1.57 0.11 2.27 2.29 2.35 0.04 0.62 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.00 1.02 1.03 1.03 0.01 0.964: Lake Mead Blvd to Decatur Blvd 1.05 1.07 1.09 0.02 1.29 1.36 1.13 -0.08 0.85 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.00 0.945: Decatur Blvd to Rancho Dr 1.51 2.04 1.31 -0.10 2.84 3.73 2.13 -0.36 0.56 0.98 1 0.98 0.00 1.03 1.07 1.03 0.00 0.956: Rancho Dr to I-15 2.47 1.91 1.51 -0.48 3.99 3.27 2.48 -0.76 0.60 0.98 1.13 0.99 0.01 1.04 1.58 1.08 0.02 0.841: I-15 to Eastern Ave 1.16 1.05 1.14 -0.01 1.36 1.29 1.12 -0.12 0.89 1.53 1.90 1.24 -0.15 3.10 5.62 2.06 -0.52 0.432: Eastern Ave to Tropicana Ave 1.02 0.98 1.11 0.05 1.22 1.03 1.76 0.27 0.78 1.60 1.28 1.46 -0.07 2.85 2.64 2.11 -0.37 0.573: Tropicana Ave to I-215 1 0.96 1.01 0.01 1.11 1.07 1.15 0.02 0.89 1.02 1.01 1.08 0.03 1.12 1.36 1.63 0.26 0.764: I-215 to Wagonwheel Dr 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.00 1.03 1.02 1.02 -0.01 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.00 1.03 1.03 1.02 -0.01 0.94

I-15 Corridor By Segment PM Peak Southbound PM Peak Nouthbound1: Kyle Canyon Rd to CR-215 0.96 0.99 1.07 0.06 1.03 1.05 1.17 0.07 0.93 0.98 1.02 1.03 0.03 1.05 1.12 1.12 0.04 0.922: CR-215 to Craig Rd 0.96 1 0.96 0.00 1.03 1.07 1.03 0.00 0.93 0.95 1.03 0.99 0.02 1.04 1.28 1.14 0.05 0.863: Craig Rd to Lake Mead Blvd 0.98 1 0.98 0.00 1.04 1.06 1.05 0.01 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.00 1.04 1.03 1.02 -0.01 0.954: Lake Mead Blvd to Decatur Blvd 0.99 0.99 0.98 -0.01 1.05 1.05 1.04 -0.01 0.94 1.06 1.02 1.06 0.00 1.24 1.16 1.22 -0.01 0.875: Decatur Blvd to Rancho Dr 1.58 1.99 1.13 -0.23 2.79 3.32 1.74 -0.53 0.60 1.54 1.1 1.2 -0.17 2.82 1.56 2 -0.41 0.606: Rancho Dr to I-15 3.36 2.5 1.57 -0.90 5.36 4.88 3.04 -1.16 0.56 1.19 1.22 1.09 -0.05 2.1 1.62 1.18 -0.46 0.711: I-15 to Eastern Ave 1.42 1.3 1.15 -0.14 1.95 1.7 2.08 0.07 0.68 2.35 2.82 2.41 0.03 4.02 5.29 3.42 -0.30 0.602: Eastern Ave to Tropicana Ave 1.07 1.08 1.32 0.13 1.51 1.49 2.24 0.37 0.66 2.03 1.73 1.67 -0.18 3.71 2.98 2.49 -0.61 0.593: Tropicana Ave to I-215 1.04 1.04 1.05 0.01 1.28 1.27 1.23 -0.03 0.83 1.08 1.10 1.22 0.07 1.46 1.51 1.74 0.14 0.724: I-215 to Wagonwheel Dr 0.95 0.96 0.94 -0.01 1.03 1.05 1.02 -0.01 0.92 0.97 0.98 0.95 -0.01 1.03 1.03 1.02 -0.01 0.94

Figure~: 24 Hour (Tue., Wed., & Thu.) Six Season Congestion Scan along US-95/I-515 during 2018 by Travel Time Index. Traditional Peak Hours Delineated by Dotted Lines

SB↓

NB↑

CR-215/I-215

Las Vegas Beltway covers 50.5 miles and is becoming one of the most important freeways in the regional transportation system following quick expansion of the urbanized area. As of the end on 2018, the northeastern most stretch of the loop routes traffic along signalized ramps. Clockwise traffic is northbound or eastbound, and counterclockwise traffic is southbound or westbound.

Extent:As Map ~ illustrates, there are multiple segments experiencing congestion

along southern portions of the beltway. The most congested segments along the southern section are northbound from Airport Connector to Rainbow Blvd.

Duration:According to Figure ~, congestion on CR-215/I-215 follows a roughly

traditional morning and evening peak pattern with an extended PM peak which is a typical pattern in the Las Vegas Valley. The exception would be morning northbound traffic which doesn’t experience much in the way of congestion.

Intensity:Table ~ illustrates that, during the months of March and April, the most

intense congestion is northbound I-215 during the pm peak. Morning and afternoon congestion is accumulating on Segment 6 of CR-215. Route substitution may be also influencing traffic volumes here as west valley commuters choose CR-215 instead of Summerlin Pkwy/US-95 to avoid Project Neon related congestion. This segment may also be prone to congestion due to weaving caused by multiple on and off ramps.

Variability:In 2017, traffic was influenced by the Phase 2 Airport Connector Project

which included, among other things, the widened ramps and an auxiliary lane. Specifically, Eastbound lane reductions at Exit 10 for approximately 1 mile to the Warm Springs Road exit, closure of the warm springs off-ramp, and westbound lane reductions from Windmill to Airport Connector contributed to three year congestion highs.

Congestion variability on CR-215 from N Decatur Blvd to US-95, is influenced by ongoing construction of the Centennial Bowl interchange and does not signify potential capacity issues.

Strategy Effectiveness: With the completion of the three year Craig Road to Hualapai Way

Project in August, 2018 and the Phase 2 Airport Connector Project in August, 2017, the beltway continues to mature. The immense population growth in recent years makes it difficult to manage congestion with capacity building projects (e.g. the 2019 widening from Decatur to Tropicana) alone. To squeeze every last bit of utility possible, Freeway & Arterial System of Transportation leverages intelligent transportation systems to closely monitor and manage this limited resource.

Map~: CR-215/I-215 Annual Travel Time Index

Table~: Corridor Performance By Segment along CR-215/I-215 during March & May

CR-215/I-215 Corridor By SegmentTravel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio Travel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio

16 17 18 X ̅Δ 16 17 18 X ̅Δ X ̅ TTI/PTI 16 17 18 X ̅Δ 16 17 18 X ̅Δ X ̅ TTI/PTIAM Peak Southbound AM Peak Northbound

1: I-15 to N Decatur Blvd 1.04 0.97 1.01 -0.02 1.2 1.14 1.15 -0.03 0.87 1.08 1.02 1.11 0.02 1.27 1.35 1.44 0.09 0.792: N Decatur Blvd to US-95 1.23 1.12 1.01 -0.11 1.71 1.47 1.23 -0.24 0.76 1.08 1.07 1 -0.04 1.42 1.44 1.25 -0.09 0.773: US-95 to Cheyenne Ave 1.11 1.17 1.13 0.01 1.44 1.55 1.67 0.12 0.73 1.1 1.13 1.28 0.09 1.37 1.42 2.27 0.45 0.694: Cheyenne Ave To Charleston Ave 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.00 1.04 1.04 1.06 0.01 0.93 0.99 0.99 0.97 -0.01 1.07 1.05 1.03 -0.02 0.945: Charleston Ave to Tropicana Ave 0.97 0.98 1 0.02 1.03 1.03 1.06 0.02 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.96 -0.01 1.04 1.03 1.03 -0.01 0.946: Tropicana Ave to Rainbow Blvd 1.57 2.06 2.08 0.26 2.72 3.48 3.22 0.25 0.61 0.99 0.99 0.96 -0.02 1.05 1.04 1.03 -0.01 0.947: Rainbow Blvd to I-15 1.23 1.35 1.17 -0.03 1.57 1.65 1.34 -0.12 0.82 1.02 1.1 1.1 0.04 1.13 1.44 1.54 0.21 0.781: I-15 to Airport Connector 1.12 1.08 0.97 -0.08 1.44 1.17 1.04 -0.20 0.87 1.02 1.08 1.19 0.09 1.14 1.43 1.97 0.42 0.722: Airport Connector to St. Rose 0.98 1 0.99 0.01 1.02 1.04 1.03 0.01 0.96 1.45 1.69 1.06 -0.20 2.64 2.59 1.44 -0.60 0.633: St. Rose Pkwy to I-515 0.97 1 1.1 0.07 1.04 1.05 1.3 0.13 0.91 1.48 1.39 1.45 -0.02 3.05 2.56 2.38 -0.34 0.54

CR-215/I-215 Corridor By Segment PM Peak Southbound PM Peak Nouthbound1: I-15 to N Decatur Blvd 1.06 1.02 1.03 -0.02 1.29 1.27 1.21 -0.04 0.82 1.05 1 1.04 -0.01 1.26 1.24 1.23 -0.02 0.832: N Decatur Blvd to US-95 1.22 1.25 1 -0.11 1.74 1.75 1.33 -0.21 0.72 1.08 1.04 0.99 -0.05 1.52 1.32 1.23 -0.15 0.763: US-95 to Cheyenne Ave 1.02 1.1 0.96 -0.03 1.21 1.46 1.2 -0.01 0.80 1.19 1.17 0.99 -0.10 1.68 1.54 1.15 -0.27 0.774: Cheyenne Ave To Charleston Ave 0.98 0.98 0.95 -0.02 1.06 1.07 1.02 -0.02 0.92 0.98 0.98 0.97 -0.01 1.04 1.04 1.02 -0.01 0.955: Charleston Ave to Tropicana Ave 0.99 0.98 0.97 -0.01 1.05 1.04 1.03 -0.01 0.94 1.15 1.33 1.7 0.28 1.68 1.99 2.21 0.27 0.716: Tropicana Ave to Rainbow Blvd 1.1 1.29 1.46 0.18 1.56 2.16 2.28 0.36 0.64 1.05 1.16 1.81 0.38 1.31 1.71 3.06 0.88 0.667: Rainbow Blvd to I-15 1.32 1.31 1.22 -0.05 2.03 1.85 1.38 -0.33 0.73 2.1 2.53 1.7 -0.20 2.92 3.46 2.22 -0.35 0.741: I-15 to Airport Connector 1.64 1.21 1.03 -0.31 2.58 2.11 1.18 -0.70 0.66 2.49 3.12 2.22 -0.14 3.83 4.45 2.95 -0.44 0.702: Airport Connector to St. Rose 1.22 1.52 1.72 0.25 1.84 2.63 3.95 1.06 0.53 1.16 1.29 1.03 -0.06 1.91 2.04 1.29 -0.31 0.663: St. Rose Pkwy to I-515 1.15 1.21 1.36 0.11 1.8 2.01 2.42 0.31 0.60 1.09 1.12 1.3 0.11 1.52 1.58 2.01 0.25 0.69

Figure~: 24 Hour (Tue., Wed., & Thu.) Six Season Congestion Scan along CR-215/I-215 during 2018 by Travel Time Index. Traditional Peak Hours Delineated.

SB↓

NB↑

WB↑

EB↓

Rancho Drive

Rancho Drive is a 7 mile state highway. It is also designated as U.S. Route 95 Business. It is a major arterial connecting downtown Las Vegas to the northwest part of the city.

Extent:As presented by Map ~, congestion predominantly exists on Rancho Drive

on its southern end from Vegas Drive to Sahara Ave.

Duration:Figure ~ depicts that during the morning peak only southbound traffic

experience significant congestion on Rancho Dr. Congested conditions exist for both northbound and southbound traffic during the afternoon peak.

Intensity:According to Table ~, southbound traffic slows down from Vegas Dr with

travel time index reaching greater than 1.5 during both the morning and evening peaks. The northbound traffic on Rancho gets more congestion in the evening with travel time index estimated at greater than 1.5 for the segment from Sahara to US-95 ramps.

Variability:The Neon Project has led to limited capacity of US-95 SB to I-15 SB ramps

and on Martin L King Blvd, which resulted in redirection of traffic volumes to Rancho Dr, the closest north-south arterial. This has led to growth of delays on southbound Rancho. In 2018, lane closures and construction on Sahara at its I-15 interchange may have held up southbound traffic upstream of vehicles looking to turn onto Sahara in the Spring and Fall.

Consistent bottleneck occurrences can partially be explained by Rancho’s access to the University Medical Center, Downtown Las Vegas, and The Strip at the intersections of Charleston and Sahara.

Strategy Effectiveness:A CMAQ funded project, entitled Traffic Package 6B, was planned to

occur roughly from May to October of 2018 at the intersection of Charleston Blvd and Rancho Dr. This would have included the construction of right hand turn lanes and accompanying traffic signal improvements. This particular project did not occur. However, in July of 2018, a roadway improvement project entitled Rancho Complete Street Improvements entered into design status. While the project scope is subject to change it is likely to focus on improving Rancho Dr from US-95 to Sahara Ave.

Map~: Rancho Drive Annual Travel Time Index

Table~: Corridor Performance By Segment along Rancho Drive during March & May

CR-215/I-215 Corridor By Segment

Travel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio Travel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio

16 17 18 X̅Δ 16 17 18 X̅Δ X̅ TTI/PTI 16 17 18 X̅Δ 16 17 18 X̅Δ X̅ TTI/PTI

AM Peak Southbound AM Peak Northbound

1: US-95 to Craig Rd 1.03 1.1 1.06 0.02 1.39 1.58 1.45 0.03 0.72 1.09 1.18 1.23 0.07 1.52 1.64 2.49 0.49 0.62

2: Craig Rd to Vegas Dr 0.99 1.05 1.11 0.06 1.42 1.49 1.67 0.13 0.69 1.03 1.13 1.18 0.08 1.42 1.61 1.66 0.12 0.71

3: Vegas Dr to US-95 1.24 1.55 1.41 0.09 2.12 2.69 2.76 0.32 0.55 1.11 1.07 1.07 -0.02 1.57 1.59 1.65 0.04 0.68

4: US-95 to Sahara Ave 1.21 1.41 1.65 0.22 1.78 1.98 2.64 0.43 0.67 1.06 1.3 1.21 0.08 1.36 1.9 1.63 0.14 0.73

CR-215/I-215 Corridor By Segment PM Peak Southbound PM Peak Nouthbound

1: US-95 to Craig Rd 1.12 1.13 1.11 -0.01 1.54 1.65 1.61 0.04 0.70 1.05 1.03 1.09 0.02 1.57 1.41 1.88 0.16 0.65

2: Craig Rd to Vegas Dr 1.02 1.12 1.13 0.05 1.44 1.57 1.67 0.12 0.70 0.98 1.06 1.03 0.03 1.38 1.54 1.45 0.04 0.70

3: Vegas Dr to US-95 1.28 1.5 1.53 0.13 1.88 2.42 2.42 0.27 0.64 1.11 1.08 1.32 0.11 1.66 1.57 2.24 0.29 0.64

4: US-95 to Sahara Ave 1.17 1.4 1.79 0.31 1.76 2.09 2.57 0.41 0.68 1.27 1.91 1.53 0.13 1.84 2.99 2.21 0.19 0.67

Figure~: 24 Hour (Tue., Wed., & Thu.) Six Season Congestion Scan along Rancho Drive during 2018 by Travel Time Index. Traditional Peak Hours Delineated.

SB↓

NB↑

Martin L King Boulevard

Martin L King Boulevard connects the western edge of Downtown Las Vegas to the north-central Las Vegas Valley.

Extent:As Map ~ illustrates congestion exists mostly on southern portions of Martin

L King Blvd. Peak hour congestion is most persistent from US-95 to Oakey Blvd.

Duration:Figure ~ demonstrates that congestion follows a traditional peak period

hours. During portions of 2018, congestion did not experience the usual trough between peak periods.

Intensity:In September and October 2018, Segment 3 (Southbound) of Martin L

King Blvd was one of the worst performing non-freeway segments with a travel time index equal to 1.77 during the morning peak hour, i.e. on average people spent 77% more time than off peak to travel through this segment. As referenced in Table ~, performance has fluctuated in the past three years but stabilizes back to less than severe congestion.

Variability:In contrast with freeway bottlenecks, congestion on arterials has a less

distinct pattern with some variations to the start and end time of congestion. The main bottlenecks are the intersection of Martin L King with Charleston Blvd. and US-95.

Martin Luther King Blvd from US-95 to Charleston Blvd was continually affected by Project Neon through the majority of 2018 since it was being used as detour for traffic going from US-95 South towards I-15 South (through Pinto Lane Ramp) and I-15 North (official detour through Bonanza Rd). In addition, northbound and southbound lane restrictions along Martin L King Blvd impacted congestion throughout 2018. A southbound lane restriction in the Fall at Alta Drive may have contributed to the three year high of congestion experienced upstream of the intersection.

Strategy Effectiveness: As s result of Project Neon, Martin L King Blvd has received a new

alignment and has been configured to have more limited access. The key bottleneck at Charleston Blvd was mitigated by the construction of a flyover over Charleston Boulevard which opened the summer of 2017. In addition, the Alta Drive intersection was widened. A new set of traffic signals at the Bearden drive intersection were installed in the Fall of 2017. Lastly, NDOT opened a new eastbound Charleston Boulevard slip-ramp onto north and southbound Martin L King Blvd on May 6, 2019. The new single-lane signalized ramp improves connectivity and access into downtown Las Vegas.

Although performance has been somewhat unreliable, construction management best practices and the opening of new capacity has mitigated congestion on Martin L King Blvd. A feasibility study of an extending Martin L King parallel of I-15 to Rancho Dr. has yet to begin its design phase.

Map~: Martin Luther King Boulevard Annual Travel Time Index

Table~: Corridor Performance By Segment along Martin Luther King Boulevard during March & May

CR-215/I-215 Corridor By Segment

Travel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio Travel Time Index Planning Time Index Ratio

16 17 18 X̅Δ 16 17 18 X̅Δ X̅ TTI/PTI 16 17 18 X̅Δ 16 17 18 X̅Δ X̅ TTI/PTI

AM Peak Southbound AM Peak Northbound

1: Craig Rd to Lake Mead Blvd 1.18 1.18 1.17 -0.01 1.71 1.68 1.73 0.01 0.69 1.07 1.19 1.11 0.02 1.46 1.69 1.6 0.07 0.71

2: Lake Mead Blvd to US-95 1.58 1.95 1.37 -0.11 2.74 3.32 2.56 -0.09 0.57 1.11 1.21 1.13 0.01 1.79 2.05 1.95 0.08 0.60

3: US-95 to Oakey Blvd 1.19 1.28 1.07 -0.06 1.79 1.28 1.07 -0.36 0.86 1.17 1.27 1.24 0.04 1.58 1.73 1.95 0.19 0.70

CR-215/I-215 Corridor By Segment PM Peak Southbound PM Peak Nouthbound

1: Craig Rd to Lake Mead Blvd 1.13 1.24 1.19 0.03 1.53 1.87 1.72 0.10 0.70 1.21 1.3 1.21 0.00 1.72 1.93 1.81 0.05 0.68

2: Lake Mead Blvd to US-95 1.24 1.66 1.18 -0.03 2.21 2.91 1.95 -0.13 0.58 1.25 1.37 1.2 -0.03 2.13 2.55 2.07 -0.03 0.57

3: US-95 to Oakey Blvd 1.35 1.5 1.11 -0.12 2.06 2.48 2.12 0.03 0.59 1.27 1.56 1.14 -0.07 1.83 2.81 1.56 -0.14 0.64

Figure~: 24 Hour (Tue., Wed., & Thu.) Six Season Congestion Scan along Martin L King Blvd during 2018 by Travel Time Index. Traditional Peak Hours Delineated.

SB↓

NB↑

83 List of Figures

Appendix B: Report Reference List of Figures FIGURE ~: SOURCES OF CONGESTION BY TYPE OF INCIDENT (NATIONAL SUMMARY) ........... 6 FIGURE ~: 8 ELEMENTS OF THE CMP .............................................................................................. 8 FIGURE ~: PRIMARY FUNCTIONS OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ....................................................................................................................... 9 FIGURE ~: PERCENT OF THE PERSON-MILES TRAVELED ON THE INTERSTATE THAT ARE RELIABLE ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 FIGURE ~: PERCENT OF THE PERSON-MILES TRAVELED ON THE NON-INTERSTATE NHS THAT ARE RELIABLE ........................................................................................................................................ 17 FIGURE ~: TRUCK TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY INDEX ..................................................................... 17 FIGURE ~: ANNUAL HOURS OF PEAK HOUR EXCESSIVE DELAY PER CAPITA ........................... 18 FIGURE ~: MONTHLY USER DELAY COST ESTIMATES .................................................................. 18 FIGURE ~: MONTHLY BUS ON-TIME PERFORMANCE (5 MINUTE STANDARD) ........................... 19 FIGURE ~: SCREENSHOT OF FAST PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD .............................................. 22 FIGURE ~: SCREENSHOT OF WAYCARE’S SMART HIGHWAY PLATFORM .................................. 23 FIGURE ~: WAZE APPLICATION’S USER INTERFACE .................................................................... 27 FIGURE ~: DASHBOARD CAMERA WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTERNET CONNECTIVITY ............................................................................................................................. 28 FIGURE ~: YEARLY DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC BY DAY OF WEEK AND TIME OF DAY............... 29 FIGURE ~: INRIX BOTTLENECK DEFINITION .................................................................................. 32 FIGURE ~: 2018 BOTTLENECK CONGESTION METRIC ON I-15 N @ WILBER CLARK/WEST DESERT INN ROAD AGGREGATED BY MONTH AND DAY OF MONTH ................................................... 34 FIGURE ~: 2018 BOTTLENECK CONGESTION METRIC ON I-15 N @ WILBER CLARK/WEST DESERT INN ROAD AGGREGATED BY DAY OF WEEK AND HOUR OF DAY ........................................... 34 FIGURE ~: 2018 TIME SPIRAL OF BOTTLENECK OCCURRENCES ON I-15 N @ WILBER CLARK/WEST DESERT INN ROAD ................................................................................................. 35 FIGURE ~: 2018 BOTTLENECK CONGESTION METRIC ON I-515 N @ CASINO CENTER BLVD/EXIT 75 AGGREGATED BY MONTH AND DAY OF MONTH ................................................................. 36 FIGURE ~: 2018 BOTTLENECK CONGESTION METRIC ON I-515 N @ CASINO CENTER BLVD/EXIT 75 AGGREGATED BY DAY OF WEEK AND HOUR OF DAY ......................................................... 36 FIGURE ~: 2018 TIME SPIRAL OF BOTTLENECK OCCURRENCES ON I-515 N @ CASINO CENTER BLVD/EXIT 75 ................................................................................................................................ 37 FIGURE ~: 2018 BOTTLENECK CONGESTION METRIC ON I-215 W @ DECATUR BLVD/EXIT 11 AGGREGATED BY MONTH AND DAY OF MONTH ...................................................................... 38 FIGURE ~: 2018 BOTTLENECK CONGESTION METRIC ON I-215 W @ DECATUR BLVD/EXIT 11 AGGREGATED BY DAY OF WEEK AND HOUR OF DAY .............................................................. 38

84 Appendix B: Report Reference

FIGURE ~: 2018 TIME SPIRAL OF BOTTLENECK OCCURRENCES ON I-215 W @ DECATUR BLVD/EXIT 11 ................................................................................................................................ 39 FIGURE ~: CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY TIERS ........................................................ 42 FIGURE ~: GENERALIZED EFFECT OF DISSUADED DEMAND ON TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE......................................................... 43 FIGURE ~: GENERALIZED RURAL-URBAN LAND USE TRANSECTS ............................................... 44 FIGURE ~: PROPOSED LONG-TERM HOV SYSTEM ...................................................................... 52 FIGURE ~: STYLIZED MARYLAND PARKWAY CORRIDOR ............................................................ 53 FIGURE ~: BUS RAPID TRANSIT RENDERING ................................................................................ 53 FIGURE ~: DEER SPRINGS LIVABLE CENTERS STUDY AREA ......................................................... 54 FIGURE ~: TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP SYMBOLOGY.......................................................................... 55 FIGURE ~: TRANSIT APP USER INTERFACE ................................................................................... 56 FIGURE ~ BONEVILLE TRANSIT CENTER DIAGRAM ..................................................................... 57 FIGURE ~: SAMPLE PURDUE COORDINATION DIAGRAM .......................................................... 62 FIGURE ~: SAMPLE PURDUE PHASE TERMINATION CHART ......................................................... 63 FIGURE ~: FAST MANAGED DYNAMIC MESSAGE SIGNS .......................................................... 65 FIGURE ~: PROJECT NEON’S TIMELINE ........................................................................................ 66 FIGURE~: 24 HOUR (TUE., WED., & THU.) SIX SEASON CONGESTION SCAN ALONG I-15 DURING 2018 BY TRAVEL TIME INDEX. TRADITIONAL PEAK HOURS DELINEATED BY DOTTED LINES. TOP 5 BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS (APPROX.) LABELED. ........................................................................ 74 FIGURE~: 24 HOUR (TUE., WED., & THU.) SIX SEASON CONGESTION SCAN ALONG US-95/I-515 DURING 2018 BY TRAVEL TIME INDEX. TRADITIONAL PEAK HOURS DELINEATED BY DOTTED LINES. TOP 5 BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS (APPROX.) LABELED. ................................................... 76 FIGURE~: 24 HOUR (TUE., WED., & THU.) SIX SEASON CONGESTION SCAN ALONG CR-215/I-215 DURING 2018 BY TRAVEL TIME INDEX. TRADITIONAL PEAK HOURS DELINEATED. TOP 5 BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS (APPROX.) LABELED. ........................................................................ 78 FIGURE~: 24 HOUR (TUE., WED., & THU.) SIX SEASON CONGESTION SCAN ALONG RANCHO DRIVE DURING 2018 BY TRAVEL TIME INDEX. TRADITIONAL PEAK HOURS DELINEATED. TOP 5 BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS (APPROX.) LABELED. ........................................................................ 80 FIGURE~: 24 HOUR (TUE., WED., & THU.) SIX SEASON CONGESTION SCAN ALONG MARTIN L KING BLVD DURING 2018 BY TRAVEL TIME INDEX. TRADITIONAL PEAK HOURS DELINEATED. TOP 5 BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS (APPROX.) LABELED. .............................................................. 82

85 List of Maps

List of Maps MAP ~: THE CMP SYSTEM NETWORK ........................................................................................... 14 MAP ~: MORNING PEAK TRAVEL TIME INDEX BY TMC, MARCH – APRIL 2018 ........................ 30 MAP ~: AFTERNOON PEAK TRAVEL TIME INDEX BY TMC, MARCH – APRIL 2018 ..................... 31 MAP ~: APPROXIMATE BOTTLENECK HEAD AND QUEUE AT MAX LENGTH ON I-15 N @ WILBER CLARK/WEST DESERT INN ROAD ................................................................................................. 35 MAP ~: APPROXIMATE BOTTLENECK HEAD AND QUEUE AT MAX LENGTH ON I-515 N @ CASINO CENTER BLVD/EXIT 75 ................................................................................................... 37 MAP ~: APPROXIMATE BOTTLENECK HEAD AND QUEUE AT MAX LENGTH ON I-215 W @ DECATUR BLVD/EXIT 11 ............................................................................................................... 39 MAP ~: NO BUILD SCENARIO—MODELED 2040 DEMAND WITH EXISTING NETWORKS: PM PEAK AUTO TIME FROM TAZ 528 TO ALL TAZS (COUNTY BUILDING IS LOCATED IN TAZ 528) .......... 68 MAP~: I-15 SEGMENTS 3-5 ANNUAL TRAVEL TIME INDEX ......................................................... 73 MAP~: US-95/I-515 ANNUAL TRAVEL TIME INDEX ..................................................................... 75 MAP~: CR-215/I-215 ANNUAL TRAVEL TIME INDEX .................................................................. 77 MAP~: RANCHO DRIVE ANNUAL TRAVEL TIME INDEX .............................................................. 79 MAP~: MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD ANNUAL TRAVEL TIME INDEX ............................... 81

86 Appendix B: Report Reference

List of Tables TABLE ~: QUARTERLY INCIDENT CLEARANCE TIME PERFORMANCE MEASURE ........................ 20 TABLE ~: RTC CMAQ FUNDING FOR 2015-2019 ........................................................................ 49 TABLE ~: CHARLESTON BLVD SIGNAL TIMING WORK ................................................................ 63 TABLE~: CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE BY SEGMENT ALONG I-15 DURING MARCH & MAY .... 73 TABLE~: CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE BY SEGMENT ALONG US-95/I-515 DURING MARCH & MAY .............................................................................................................................................. 75 TABLE~: CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE BY SEGMENT ALONG CR-215/I-215 DURING MARCH & MAY .............................................................................................................................................. 77 TABLE~: CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE BY SEGMENT ALONG RANCHO DRIVE DURING MARCH & MAY ........................................................................................................................................... 79 TABLE~: CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE BY SEGMENT ALONG MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD DURING MARCH & MAY .............................................................................................................. 81

87 Endnotes

Endnotes I Federal Highway Administration. Figure 2, Congestion Management Process: A Guidebook II United States Census Bureau. Table 16, Summary of General Characteristics: 1970. The Nineteenth United States Census, Nevada 30 - 23. III Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. Statewide Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning. Final Rule. § 450.322 IV Center for Applied Transect Studies. SmartCode Version 9.2 V Nevada DOT 2018 HOV Plan Addendum VI Transporation Research Board (2000). Highway Capacity Manual. Equation and Exhibit 15-4. VII Federal Highway Administration. An Objectives- and Performance-based Approach for Improving the Design Operations and Maintenance of Traffic Signal Systems VIII Federal Highway Administration. An Objectives- and Performance-based Approach for Improving the Design Operations and Maintenance of Traffic Signal Systems

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF

SOUTHERN NEVADA

AGENDA ITEM

Metropolitan Planning Organization [X ] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ]

SUBJECT: FINAL CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PETITIONER: M.J. MAYNARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE EXECUTIVE ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

FISCAL IMPACT:

None

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with State of Nevada Open Meeting Law, the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Executive Advisory Committee shall invite interested persons to make comments. For the initial Citizens Participation, the public should address items on the current agenda. For the final Citizens Participation, interested persons may make comments on matters within the Executive Advisory Committee's jurisdiction, but not necessarily on the current agenda.

No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Executive Advisory Committee can direct that it be placed on a future agenda.

Respectfully submitted,

Non-Consent

_______________________________ JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Senior Director of Engineering

ssa

5067

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0553388F-9295-4845-8661-D2C04BE0F037