Brief Research Report

Chinese returnees’ conceptions of positivecareer outcomes after graduating fromAustralian universities – quantitativefindings

Serene Lin-StephensMacquarie University, Australia

John UesiMacquarie University, Australia

Julie DohertyMacquarie University, Australia

Abstract

This paper reports the quantitative findings of a study on conceptions of positive career outcomes held by Chinese

students who returned home to work after gaining higher education qualifications in Australia. The study explores what

positive career outcomes mean to Chinese returnees, the actual positive career outcomes Chinese returnees have

experienced and contributing factors to the positive career outcomes achieved. Both quantitative and qualitative

research methods are used and here the analysis of the quantitative findings is presented. The survey data show that

Chinese returnees assign greater importance to ‘soft outcomes’ relating to personal and life fulfilment than ‘hard out-

comes’ such as employment results. Also, the discrepancy between the returnees’ ideal and actual outcomes is greater in

the soft outcomes than the hard outcomes. Statistical analysis indicates three emergent, distinct groups of conceptions of

positive career outcomes. The qualitative findings will be presented separately.

Keywords

Chinese returnee, career outcome, Chinese students, international student, employability, Australian higher education,

student outcome, graduate outcome, Chinese graduate, overseas student

Introduction

Twenty-five per cent of tertiary students in Australiaare international students. Of which, students fromChina are the single largest group contributing tothe international student number and remain a par-ticularly strong cohort in the international studentmarket (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011). Theresearch snapshot released by Australian EducationInternational (AEI) shows that China alone (notincluding Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau) accountsfor 39.9% of all international student enrolment inAustralian higher education (AEI, 2014a). The latestAEI August 2014 enrolment number indicates thatthere are currently around 90,000 students fromChina in Australian higher education (AEI, 2014b).

The latest full year statistics available show that therewere 94,782 students in total from China (excludingSARs and Taiwan) in 2013 (Department of Educationand Training, 2014b).

From 2010 to 2014, approximately 40,000–46,000visas each year were granted to Chinese internationalstudents studying in higher education (excluding non-awards) (Department of Immigration andCitizenship, 2014). But only around 11,000 Chineseapplicants in 2012–13 were granted permanent resi-dency through points tested skilled migration and per-manent employer sponsored migration (Departmentof Immigration and Border Protection, 2014), someof whom were former Chinese international students.This suggests that the main option for most Chineseoverseas students after studying in Australia is not

Corresponding author:

Serene Lin-Stephens, Career and Employment Service, Macquarie University, North Ryde 2109, New South Wales, Australia.

Email: serene.lin-stephens@mq.edu.au

Australian Journal of Career Development

2015, Vol. 24(2) 120–129

! Australian Council for Educational

Research 2015

Reprints and permissions:

sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav

DOI: 10.1177/1038416215576344

acd.sagepub.com

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

migrating to Australia but most likely returninghome, which coincides with a global trend ofChinese students returning home after studying over-seas. According to the Ministry of Human Resourcesand Social Security in China, the number of Chineseoverseas students returning home to work is growingdrastically, with the number rising from 69,300 in2008 to over 300,000 in 2013 (People’s Daily, 26February 2014; Xinhua, 21 February 2014).Government statistics from Chinese Service Centerfor Scholarly Exchange shows that since 1970s,more than 72% of overseas students have returnedhome to China after studying abroad (China Daily,19 November 2012). The 2012 survey of EIC, one ofthe largest international education agencies in Chinaalso shows that more than 70% of Chinese overseasstudents returned home after studying abroad(Xinhua, 17 October 2013).

With the significant presence of Chinese students inAustralian universities and their growing home-bound mobility, an understanding of the perceivedvalue and career outcomes of studying in Australiais necessary for the design and continuous improve-ment of career support for this major cohort of uni-versity students. Surprisingly there is a significant lackof research on what constitutes good results and theenabling factors for Chinese international students.

Positive career outcomes

It is known that Chinese students share great concernover career development (Hou, Leung, Li, Li, & Xu,2012). From a consumer value’s standpoint, the func-tional, pragmatic value (usefulness of a degree insecuring employment) of a degree has been found toplay a critical role in Chinese students’ choice ofdegree programs (Lai, To, Lung, & Lai, 2012).From other social, contextual and cultural stand-points, cultural values and parental expectation arefound to associate with Chinese students’ career deci-sion making (Leung, Hou, Gati, & Li, 2011).However, it is unclear how these factors influenceChinese students who study abroad, particularly inAustralian higher education. After all, there is avery wide range of motivations for Chinese studentsto study in Australia (Yang, 2007; Yao, 2004). Giventhe lack of investigation on this cohort, it is necessaryto explore their career needs by first looking at theirbroad conceptions of expectations and outcomes.

Career outcomes in general have been loosely dis-cussed by researchers in areas such as vocational psych-ology, career development, higher education,economics, human resource, business and manage-ment. Although the termwas never specifically defined,discussions on this subject have referred to career out-comes as occupational status (Keane & Wolpin, 1997;Roksa & Levey, 2010), promotion (Forret &Dougherty, 2004; Gong, Chen, & Yang, 2014), com-pensation (Forret & Dougherty, 2004), educational

continuation (Kean & Wolpin, 1997), job satisfaction(Gong et al., 2014), etc. In Australian higher educa-tion, career outcomes are commonly expressed aswork and study outcomes (Graduate CareersAustralia, 2015). Up to 2014, graduate outcomes haveexclusively been reported through GraduateDestination Survey, Postgraduate Destination Surveyand Beyond Graduation Survey, in which the specificoutcomes reported are predominantly objective out-comes of work or study situation, industry, occupationand salary.While this reflects the status quo of employ-ability exemplifying graduate outcomes of Australianuniversities, some other studies are found to haveaddressed graduate career outcomes more comprehen-sively. This is achieved, for example, by differentiatingbetween intrinsic and extrinsic, or subjective andobjective outcomes (Guo, Porschitz, & Alves, 2013),thus allowing conceptual diversity. This is also achievedby including less tangible outcomes in the discussion ofoutcomes, such as non-monetary rewards as well as theaccumulation of cultural and social capitals (Xu, 2013).Moreover, discussions of graduate attributes (Barrie,2007) and identity development (Daniels & Brooker,2014) provide linkages between generic and core out-comes of higher education student experience andworkreadiness.

Outcomes beyond employability results are com-monly found in international student literature.Overseas studying is said to lead to enhanced culturalawareness, changes in worldviews, self and intercul-tural identities (Gill, 2010). In Brown’s (2009) study,by placing international students in the context oflong-term tourism to examine outcomes of the inter-national sojourn, the outcomes found include cross-cultural understanding, independence, changes in lifeperspective and philosophy, self-direction, resilienceand character building. While most of these referencesrefer to concepts that are neutral or positive in nature,some of the outcomes discussed are negative; for exam-ple, reverse culture shock of returnees (Gaw, 2000).

While there is no direct comprehensive study onChinese returnees career outcomes, a few studieshave examined the consequences of the returnees’overseas studying experience. These consequenceshave been discussed in association with returnees’impact on home countries’ modernisation and global-isation in China and Taiwan (Wang et al., 2011;Zhang et al., 2011, Zhou & Hsu, 2010), the effect ofstudying abroad experience on the returnees’ lives andwork (Gill, 2010), family expectation (Lee & Morrish,2012) and subjective career success (Guo et al., 2013),to name a few.

For the purpose of this study, career outcomes areoperationalised as a construct understood as conse-quences of processes concerning whole personsdeveloping their life and living. We share Wolfe andKolb’s (1980) broad view of career development as aphenomenon that involves one’s whole life andperson, changing life contexts, relationships with

Lin-Stephens et al. 121

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

significant others and the wider society. In addition,we specifically seek to identity desirable career out-comes, given that ‘career outcome’ should be treatedas a neutral term.

Method

A study was designed and conducted to enhance ourunderstanding of positive career outcomes of Chinesereturnees. The study targets Chinese international stu-dents who had received at least one higher educationqualification from an Australian university andreturned to the Greater China region (MainlandChina, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau) to work. Itaims to examine what they referred to as positivecareer outcomes, what they actually experienced andwhat they deemed as contributing factors to the posi-tive career outcomes.

A mixed methods approach is adopted for theresearch design of the study. Both questionnairedata and semi-structured interview data were col-lected. In addition, observation of references to posi-tive career outcomes of Chinese returnees instakeholder presentations was carried out to crosscheck regularities in the data. This paper presentsfindings from the quantitative data.

Given that there is no similar study which exploresreturnees’ conceptions of career outcomes or contri-buting factors, we adopt a direct, open-questionapproach in forming our main questions. We seekreturnees’ demographic information, years of stay inAustralia, types and levels of qualifications gained,and responses to three main questions regarding posi-tive career outcomes, which are:

1. What do ‘positive career outcomes’ mean to you?2. What ‘positive career outcomes’ have you experi-

enced since you graduated from an Australianuniversity?

3. Based on your answers to question 2, what aspectof your Australian studying experience contributedto the positive career outcomes above?

Respondents are asked to provide their ownanswers in the blank space provided or select one ormultiple applicable answers from the 12 to 14 answeritems provided. The development of these items wasguided by career outcomes literature, survey designprinciples and particularly consultations with cur-rently enrolled Chinese students, Chinese alumni,career service staff, academics, international studentservice staff and recruiters, employers recruitingChinese returnees and professional associations.

As the potential subjects are native Chinese speakersand readers in either traditional or simplified Chinese,the survey questions were presented bilingually in bothEnglish with Simplified Chinese (for students fromMainland China) or English with Traditional Chinese(for students from Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau)

translations. The translations and survey design werereviewed by two National Accreditation Authority forTranslators and Interpreters (NAATI) accreditedtranslators and three academics from Chinese studies,Linguistics and Statistics to ensure accurate wordingand friendly reading of the questions. Ethics approvalwas obtained for the study.

Researchers collected data face to face in China andTaiwan in the period of November 2013 to early January2014. The main researcher was bilingual in Chinese andEnglish. All subjects were recruited randomly. Most ofthe participants were approached at an Austrade ChinaCareers Fair in Guangzhou for Chinese returnees whohad studied in Australia. The fair targeted Chinesegraduates who studied in Australian universities andreturned to the home region to work. The event infor-mation and invitation were distributed widely throughAustrade, Australian universities, Zaopin, AustralianChina Alumni Association and other relevant bodies.Some subjects were recruited through alumni dinnersand networking functions. To participate in the study,subjects must be of Greater China (Mainland China,Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau) origin, have had com-pleted at least one qualification from Australian univer-sities and returned to the Greater China region to work.

Results

Fifty-seven Chinese returnees from Mainland Chinaand Taiwan participated in the survey, minus one inva-lid sample. However, no returnees fromHongKong orMacau participated in the survey. The 56 surveyrespondents graduated from 21 universities inAustralia and completed 64 qualifications in total.Eight returnees obtained more than one qualificationfrom two universities and one respondent studied inthree Australian universities. A total of 64.3% ofrespondents were female and 35.7% were male. Thedifferences between the genders in respect to age andlength has been tested with ANOVA and found insig-nificant. The majority of the respondents studied inthe fields of finance, accounting, business, commerce,and education, which reflected both the generalchoice of studies of these students and the industriesthey work in (Austrade, 2011). The breakdown ofqualifications completed is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Qualifications which Chinese returnees completed

in Australian universities.

Qualifications completed in Australia Number Percentage

Graduate Diploma 1 1.56

Bachelor 22 34.38

Master coursework 36 56.25

Master by research 3 4.69

PhD 2 3.13

Total 64 100.01

122 Australian Journal of Career Development 24(2)

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Sixty-six per cent of the graduates in this studyrecorded having received a qualification in the lastfive years, with 2013 being the year of most degreeconferrals. Eight-six per cent of all qualifications rec-orded were conferred in the last 10 years. The mode oflength of stay is two years but the average duration ofstay in Australia was 4.63 years. Most graduates werepresent in Australia only for the duration of theirdegree; however, there were several individuals wholived in Australia for significantly long periods beforereturning to China or Taiwan. The minimum rec-orded stay in Australia was one year and the max-imum was 23 years.

The distribution of age in this study is meaningfullybroad. Whilst the majority of graduates were in theirmid-20s, there were a non-trivial number in a higherage range. The youngest recorded age is 22 years. Theoldest participant is 49. The average age for membersin this study was 30.5 years. Modal age was 24 years.Due to the sample size of the study, we are unable toanalyse if age, degree background and level of studywould yield any conclusive differences.

We note that results from mainland Chinese andTaiwanese respondents were not analysed separately.When results from Taiwanese respondents were addedto the results of mainland Chinese respondents,results for each analysis barely changed. Of the 56valid participants, 51 are now working in mainlandChina and five are working in Taiwan. Twelve of allrespondents in the study also have had worked inAustralia after course completion.

All respondents used one or more of the answeritems provided for each of the three main questions.

Very few additional responses were provided by par-ticipants. They were merged into identical categoriesor set aside for future reference in the next phasequalitative data analysis since the number was toosmall for statistical analysis.

Ideal versus actual positive career outcomesexperienced

Figure 1 is derived from the total responses to the firsttwo positive career outcomes questions: ‘What do“positive career outcomes” mean to you?’ and ‘What“positive career outcomes” have you experienced sinceyou graduated from an Australian university?’

The bars indicate what returnees deem as positivecareer outcomes and are sorted from highest to lowestfrequency according to the number of respondentsidentifying the outcome as positive. ‘Ability to utiliseknowledge/skills/strengths’ had the highest percentageof respondents whereas ‘satisfy family needs orexpectations’ garnered the least. The line indicatesrespondents who agreed that they had experiencedthat particular outcome. In three areas ‘increasedself-confidence’, ‘enhanced employability’ and‘obtain a recognised qualification’, the respondentsindicated they achieved their desirable career out-comes. It is very clear that there is a discrepancybetween all the other outcomes that Chinese returneesnominated as positive and all other outcomes theystated as having actually experienced.

Table 2 shows the top five responses to the ques-tions of ‘What do “positive career outcomes” mean toyou?’ and ‘What “positive career outcomes” have you

Figure 1. Total responses of ideal versus realised positive career outcomes of Chinese returnees who studied in Australian

universities.

Lin-Stephens et al. 123

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

experienced since you graduated from an Australianuniversity?’

‘Ability to utilise knowledge/skills/strengths’ and‘enhanced personal qualities and horizons’ appearedin both ideal and experienced outcomes. ‘Increasedself-confidence’, ‘enhanced employability’ and‘gaining a recognised qualification’ are also the mostrecognised career outcomes from studying inAustralia.

Table 3 shows the bottom five responses to thesetwo questions. From the responses it seems thatalthough outcomes relating to social status and work-ing in targeted workplaces do not seem as importantas personal and professional improvement, they arenevertheless significant as more than 30% of therespondents have regarded them as positive careeroutcomes. Satisfying family expectations is still a sig-nificant outcome, although not deemed as importantas the others. Similarly, in terms of the actual out-comes experienced, outcomes relating to pay, socialstatus, targeted workplaces and family expectationsranked considerably low.

Figure 2 illustrates more poignantly the magnitudeof the dissonance between outcomes amongst surveyrespondents. Only three outcomes ‘obtain qualifica-tion’, ‘enhanced employability’ and ‘increased self-confidence’ achieved a level meeting or slightlyexceeding returnees’ expectations or ideals.‘Satisfactory pay’ had the starkest discrepancy with65% fewer respondents indicating having achievedthe outcome compared to those who had designatedit as a positive career outcome.

Affinity analysis was deployed to discover co-occurrence relationships among positive career out-comes. Each category available for selection is

thought of as a binary variable. As respondentswere invited to nominate or select relevant career out-comes according to the questions of the survey, affin-ity analysis can be used to model the frequency anddependence on which outcomes are being selected inorder to gauge patterns (Agrawal & Srikant, 1994). Bydoing so, we can identify which career outcomes havea high probability of being selected together based onthe patterns of all responses. Additionally, we candetermine the specific outcomes that increase theappearance of other outcomes, offering insights intothe underlying relationship between variables. A highco-occurrence between two (or more) outcomes sug-gests an association whereby experiencing one out-come increases the likelihood of also experiencingthe second outcome.

We discovered that all respondents who experi-enced ‘increased self-confidence’ as an outcome alsodeem ‘enhanced employability’ and ‘ability to utiliseknowledge/skills/strengths’ as positive career out-comes at the same time. They also acknowledged‘international and cultural exposure’ as a contributingfactor to their positive outcomes.

All respondents who experienced ‘the qualification’as a positive outcome deem ‘work in targeted occupa-tion/job’, ‘enhanced employability’, ‘enhanced per-sonal qualities and horizons’ and ‘ability to utiliseknowledge/skills/strengths’ as positive careeroutcomes.

Contributing factors to positive career outcomesexperienced

Figure 3 shows the percentages and rank for eachaspect of studying in an Australian university that

Table 2. Top five responses of ideal versus realised positive career outcomes.

What do ‘positive career outcomes’ mean to you?

What ‘positive career outcomes’ have you experienced since

you graduated from an Australian university?

Ability to utilise knowledge/skills/strengths (43) Enhanced personal qualities and horizons (34)

Enhanced personal qualities and horizons (40) Increased self-confidence (31)

Clearer sense of self and direction (38) Enhanced employability (30)

Life fulfilment (35) Ability to utilise knowledge/skills/strengths (29)

Work in targeted occupation/job (32) Obtain a recognised qualification (22)

Table 3. Bottom five responses of ideal versus realised positive career outcomes.

What do ‘positive career outcomes’ mean to you?

What ‘positive career outcomes’ have you experienced since

you graduated from an Australian university?

Enhanced social status (23) Enhanced social status (11)

Work in targeted position/level (22) Satisfactory pay (9)

Work in targeted company/industry (21) Work in targeted position/level (9)

Obtain a recognised qualification (19) Work in targeted company/industry (9)

Satisfy family needs or expectations (17) Satisfy family needs or expectations (8)

124 Australian Journal of Career Development 24(2)

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Figure 3. Aspects of studying experience in Australia contributing to positive career outcomes Chinese returnees experienced.

Figure 2. Percentage difference between ideal and realised outcomes.

Lin-Stephens et al. 125

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Chinese returnees indicated as contributing to theirpositive career outcomes. Environmental factorssuch as ‘international and cultural exposure’, ‘oppor-tunity to use English’ and ‘character building fromchallenges encountered’ ranked very high with 70–75% of respondents regarding them as contributingfactors to their actual positive career outcomes. Onthe other hand, there were fewer respondents whoaccredited extracurricular activities, volunteer or com-munity involvement, or career services at Australianuniversities as a contributing factor to their positivecareer outcomes. It is unknown whether this isbecause fewer respondents have been involved in orgained benefits from extra curricular and volunteeringactivities or sought assistance from career services, orthere has been a disconnect or mismatch in offeringsbetween these areas and the Chinese students.

Affinity analysis shows that when a Chinese retur-nee nominated ‘work in targeted position/level’ as anoutcome they had achieved, 85.7% of the time theyalso indicated four factors as contributing factors –‘international and cultural exposure’, ‘character build-ing from challenges encountered’, ‘developmentof professional network’ and ‘the qualification’.Returnees who acknowledged any of thesefour factors as contributing to their positive careeroutcomes are also 4.3 times more likely to statethey experienced the outcome of ‘work in targetedposition/level’.

Returnees who identified ‘enhanced social status’as an outcome they achieved, 67% of the time alsoindicated ‘development of professional network’,‘friendships’ and ‘opportunity to use English’ as con-tributing factors to their positive career outcomes. Areturnee who stated experiencing any of the three

contributing factors was also 2.39 times more likelyto have experienced ‘enhanced social status’ as anoutcome.

Returnees who stated they had experienced theoutcome of ‘ability to make social contribution’83% of the time also indicated ‘work experi-ence’ and ‘curiosity to learn new things’ as thecontributing factors. Those who acknowledged thesetwo factors as contributing to their positive careeroutcomes are also 2.11 times more likely to statethey gained the ability to make social contribution.

Moreover, our analysis revealed three broad pat-terns of groups of outcomes (Figure 4) that Chinesereturnees were indicating, which suggests that some ifnot all outcomes in the group are associated with eachother.

Discussion

What constitutes positive career outcomes for univer-sity graduates is a complex phenomenon.Many factorsbesides employability contribute to students’ qualitycareer transition from university life into the world ofwork and theorists have taken various angles in exam-ining career development at macro and micro levels(Bright, 2005). At the individual level, career optimismhas been found to fully mediate the effect of self-effi-cacy on academic major satisfaction (McIlveen,Beccaria, & Burton, 2013), and career decidednesspositively correlates with subjective well-being andlife satisfaction (Meijers & Lengelle, 2012;Uthayakumar, Schimmack, Hartung, & Rogers,2010). Other factors, including the development of per-sonal qualities and career identity (LaPointe, 2010), arepart of a life-long transformative learning process.

Figure 4. Broad groups of conceptions of positive career outcomes.

126 Australian Journal of Career Development 24(2)

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

Specific to the Chinese context, Li (2012) has used aChinese concept ‘SuZhi ’ (p. 473) to look atChinese overseas students’ employability construct.SuZhi is a Chinese concept which refers to the overallquality, development and cultivation of a person.SuZhi has no direct English equivalent but broadlymeans human quality pertaining to a person or agroup of people in themodern context. Li distinguishesSuZhi from a narrow notion of personal capital andhighlights its conceptual affordance as the term refersto more than the sum of individual skills (p. 488). Lifound that Chinese overseas students attribute advan-tages they have gained to their international studyingexperience (‘soft currencies’ such as internationalexposure, intercultural competence and problem-solving skills) more than overseas credentials (‘hardcurrencies’). This distinction has been most appropri-ate andmeaningful to be used as a model to explain thefindings in this quantitative study. Indeed, followingthe same analogy, the study shows that ‘soft outcomes’(enhanced personal qualities, clearer sense of self anddirection, etc.) are ranked higher than ‘hard outcomes’(employability, qualifications, pay, etc.) and the ‘softcontributing factors’ (international and cultural expos-ures, character building, etc.) are valued more than the‘hard contributing factor’ (the qualification). The studyof Guo et al. (2013) on Chinese returnees also yieldssimilar findings which show that the returnees’ pre-ferred career outcomes are those that reflect subjectivecareer success, rather than objective career success suchas income.

The findings indicate that international and cul-tural exposure is a very strong contributing factor toChinese returnees’ positive career outcomes. This issupported by findings in the 2014 Zhaopin OverseasReturnees Survey (Zhaopin, 2014) in which 2655returnees participated. A total of 32.84% of respond-ents regarded ‘enhanced intern-cultural ability’ as thebiggest benefit of their employment in China afterstudying overseas, followed by ‘proficient foreign lan-guage skills’ (29.34%). Moreover, 69.87% of respond-ents ranked multi-national enterprises as their idealplace of work, much higher than domestic companies(21.43%) and public sector (4.41%). A recent quali-tative study on international students in Australia inwhich most respondents were Chinese also revealedthat the students’ aspiration was to work inlarge, top multinational firms (Deakin University,2004).

It is interesting to note that satisfying familyexpectation did not come out as a top outcome ineither the expected or actual outcomes achieved.Whether this may be a sign of shift from traditionalfamily values, effects of single child policy, or othersocial, cultural or economic factors is worthy of furtherinvestigation. Given that the majority of the responseswere collected at a careers fair, it is also interesting tonote that the expectation of enhanced employabilitywas met and it is not on top of the list of the most

desirable career outcomes. In contrast, outcomes relat-ing to a person’s being and capability were highlyvalued.

From the affinity analysis it appears that Chinesereturnees’ conceptions of positive career outcomes canbe roughly grouped into three clusters. One relates topersonal and life development (person), one relates topositional advantage and capabilities (positioning)and one relates to being in a place of work in a desiredtype of job, occupation, level, company and industryor that meets expectations of others (place andpeople). These conceptions will be compared withthe qualitative findings in the main study.

It is important to note that Chinese returnees rankinternational and cultural exposure, an English-speaking environment and character building veryhighly as contributing factors to their career success.Those who have increased self-confidence also experi-enced enhanced employability and ability to utiliseknowledge, skills and strengths.

Conclusion

The quantitative study yields some interesting andcounter-intuitive results and at the same time opensthe floor for new questions to be asked about positivecareer outcomes for Chinese returnees. The benefits ofoverseas studies in Australia in terms of ‘hard curren-cies’ and ‘soft currencies’ are both recognised byChinese returnees. However, the greater importanceassigned to ‘soft outcomes’ may provoke new thinkingin facilitating future Chinese returnees’ career develop-ment. The qualitative data will also be presented separ-ately to compare findings from the quantitative study.

The affinity analysis shows that there are emergentgroups of conceptions of positive career outcomes.Some career outcomes seem to strongly associatewith each other. The separate interview data andobservation analysis of the main study may assist ingaining a holistic picture of positive career outcomesfor Chinese returnees. Due to the sample size, there isscope for the study to be expanded to include a largernumber of returnees.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the inputs of Peter Petoz, Sijia Guo,

Evelyn Chang and Darren Peters to the study and the valu-able feedback provided by the reviewers.

Declaration of conflicting interests

None declared.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any fundingagency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms formining association rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th

Lin-Stephens et al. 127

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

International VLDB Conference (pp. 487–499). SanFrancisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

Austrade. (2011). Survey on employability of returned

Chinese graduates released. Retrieved from https://www.austrade.gov.au/Education/News/Updates/Survey-on-employability-of-returned-Chinese-graduates-

released#.VDdDwWdxmUk.Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Australian social

trends December 2011: International students. Retrieved

from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features20Dec+2011.

Australian Education International. (2014a). Internationalstudent enrolments by nationality in 2013. Retrieved from

https://www.aei.gov.au/research/Research-Snapshots/Documents/Enrolments%20by%20Nationality%202013.pdf.

Australian Education International. (2014b). Internationalstudent enrolment data 2014, extracted September 2014.Retrieved from https://www.aei.gov.au/research/

International-Student-Data/Documents/INTERNATIONAL%20STUDENT%20DATA/2014/2014Aug_0712.pdf.

Barrie, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teachingand learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies inHigher Education, 32, 439–458.

Bright, J. (2005). The chaos theory of careers: a user’s guide.

Career Development Quarterly, 53, 291–305.Brown, L. (2009). The transformative power of the inter-

national sojourn: an ethnographic study of the inter-

national student experience. Annals of TourismResearch, 36, 502–521.

China Daily. (2012, November 19). 72% of overseas stu-

dents return to China: report. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2012-11/19/content_15939835.htm.

Daniels, J., & Brooker, J. (2014). Student identity develop-

ment in higher education: implication for graduate attri-butes and work-readiness. Educational Research, 56, 65–76.

Deakin University. (2004). Australian International

Graduates and the Transition to Employment. Retrievedfrom http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/src/crefi/docu-ments/international-graduates-employment.pdf.

Department of Education and Training. (2014a). Selectedhigher education statistics – 2013 all students. Retrievedfrom http://education.gov.au/selected-higher-education-

statistics-2013-student-data.Department of Education and Training. (2014b). Selected

higher education statistics – 2013 overseas students.Retrieved from http://education.gov.au/selected-higher-

education-statistics-2013-student-data.Department of Immigration and Border Protection. (2014).

Australia’s migration trends 2012–13. Canberra,

Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Department of Immigration and Citizenship. (2014).

Offshore and onshore grants for 2012–13 program year

(includes eVisa grants). Retrieved from http://www.im-mi.gov.au/media/statistics/study/_pdf/2012-13-offshore-onshore-combined-grants.pdf.

Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking

behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men andwomen. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 419–437.

Gaw, K. F. (2000). Reverse culture shock in students return-

ing from overseas. International Journal of InterculturalRelations, 24, 83–104.

Gill, S. (2010). The homecoming; an investigation into theeffect that studying overseas had on Chinese postgradu-ates’ life and work on their return to China. Compare,

40, 359–376.Gong, R., Chen, S., & Yang, M. (2014). Career outcome of

employees: the mediating effect of mentoring. Social

Behavior and Personality, 42, 487–502.Graduate Careers Australia. (2015). Work and study out-

comes. Retrieved from http://www.graduatecareers.

com.au/research/exploreourresearch/workandstudyoutcomes/

Guo, C., Porschitz, E. T., & Alves, J. (2013). Exploringcareer agency during self-initiated repatriation: a study

of Chinese sea turtles. Career Development International,18, 6–11.

Hou, Z., Leung, S. A., Li, X., Li, X., & Xu, H. (2012).

Career adapt-abilities scale – China form: constructionand initial validation. Journal of Vocational Behaviour,80, 686–691.

Keane, M. P., & Wolpin, K. I. (1997). The career decisionsof young men. Journal of Political Economy, 105,473–522.

Lai, L. S. L, To, W. M., Lung, J. W. Y., & Lai, T. M. (2012).The perceived value of higher education: the voice ofChinese Students. Higher Education, 63, 271–281.

LaPointe, K. (2010). Narrating career, positioning identity:

Career identity as a narrative practice. Journal ofVocational Behaviour, 77, 1–9.

Lee, C. K. C., & Morrish, S. C. (2012). Cultural values and

higher education choices: Chinese families. AustralasianMarketing Journal, 20, 59–64.

Leung, S. A., Hou, Z., Gati, I., & Li, X. (2011). Effects of

parental expectations and cultural-values orientationon career decision-making difficulties of ChineseUniversity students. Journal of Vocational Behaviour,78, 11–20.

Li, Z. (2012). A critical account of employability construc-tion through the eyes of Chinese postgraduatestudents in the UK. Journal of Education and Work,

26, 473–493.McIlveen, P., Beccaria, G., & Burton, L. J. (2013). Beyond

conscientiousness: career optimism and satisfaction with

academic major. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 83,229–236.

Meijers, F., & Lengelle, R. (2012). Narratives at work: the

development of career identity. British Journal ofGuidance and Counselling, 40, 157–176.

People’s Daily. (2014, February 26). China sees over-seas students returning at a higher pace. Retrieved

from http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/98649/8546863.html.

Roksa, J., & Levey, T. (2010). What can you do with that

degree? College major and occupational status of collegegraduates over time. Social Forces, 89, 389–416.

Uthayakumar, R., Schimmack, U., Hartung, P. J., &

Rogers., J. R. (2010). Career decidedness as a predictorof subjective well-being. Journal of Vocational Behaviour,77, 196–204.

Wang, H., Zweig, D., & Lin, X. (2011). Returnee entrepre-

neurs: impact on China’s globalization process. Journalof Contemporary China, 20, 413–431.

Wolfe, D. M., & Kolb, D. A. (1980). Career development,

personal growth, and experimental learning. In J.W. Springer (Ed.), Issues in career and human resource

128 Australian Journal of Career Development 24(2)

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from

development. (pp. 1–2). Madison, WI: American Societyfor Training and Development.

Xinhua (2013, October 17). More Chinese Students return

to find work after studying abroad. Retrieved fromhttp://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-10/17/c_132806578.htm.

Xinhua (2014, February, 21). .Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2014-02/21/c_126168382.htm.

Xu, Y. J. (2013). Career outcomes of STEM and non-STEM college graduates: persistence in majored-fieldand influential factors in career choices. Research inHigher Education, 54, 349–382.

Yang, M. (2007). What attracts mainland Chinese studentsto Australian higher education. Studies in Learning,Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 4, 1–12.

Yao, L. (2004). The Chinese overseas students: an overviewof the flows change. In: Paper prepared for the 12thBiennial Conference of the Australian Population

Association, 15–17 September, 2004, Canberra.Zhaopin. (2014). 2014 Overseas Returnees Survey Report.

Beijing, China: Zhaopin Ltd.

Zhang,W.,Wang, H., &Alon, I. (Eds.). (2011). Entrepreneurialand business elites of china: the Chinese returnees who haveshaped modern China. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group

Publishing.Zhou, Y., & Hsu, J. (2010). Divergent engagements: roles

and strategies of Taiwanese and mainland Chinese retur-nee entrepreneurs in the IT industry. Global Networks,

11, 398–419.

Lin-Stephens et al. 129

by guest on June 5, 2015acd.sagepub.comDownloaded from