8
CONSERVATION OF SHRI GOVINDJI TEMPLE. Imphal, Manipur. CULTURAL AND HERITAGE VALUE: Terracotta brick vernacular architecture of Bengal and Manipur, bear testimony to the varied and ancient traditions of terracotta that have flourished in India over five millennia. Eastern India has experienced a vast array of the art of Terracotta in forms of temples & ornamentations that have withstood the test of time. With the vagaries of nature and decay over ages, these temples are in need of immediate preservation and maintenance. MATERIALS USED IN THE COMPOSITE STRUCTURE : The temple was built during the reign of Maharaja Nara Singha ( in 1846 AD ). This composite structure was made of : • BRICK • TERRACOTTA • TEAK WOOD Stone was rare in these areas. Being composed of small units, use of bricks gave higher flexibility and greater constructional possibility in these seismic prone regions.

Conservation Of Govindji Temple

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A heritage conservation and restoration project in Manipur, India.

Citation preview

Page 1: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

CONSERVATION OF SHRI GOVINDJI TEMPLE.Imphal, Manipur.

CULTURAL AND HERITAGE VALUE:

Terracotta brick vernacular architecture of Bengal and Manipur, bear testimony to the varied and ancient traditions of terracotta that have flourished in India over five millennia. Eastern India has experienced a vast array of the art of Terracotta in forms of temples & ornamentations that have withstood the test of time. With the vagaries of nature and decay over ages, these temples are in need of immediate preservation and maintenance.

MATERIALS USED IN THE COMPOSITE STRUCTURE :The temple was built during the reign of Maharaja Nara Singha ( in 1846 AD ).

This composite structure was made of :• BRICK • TERRACOTTA • TEAK WOOD

Stone was rare in these areas.Being composed of small units, useof bricks gave higher flexibility andgreater constructional possibility in these seismic prone regions.

Page 2: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

WHY THE CONSERVATION WAS NEEDED ?•The conservation revitalized a decaying landmark of terracota craftsmanship and terracota brick architecture.•It was a protective step towards the cultural resource of Manipur and its History.•It promoted the Socio-religious values.•The adaptive reconstruction / conservation helped to spread the traditional art of terracota not only amongst the workers involved with the project but also amongst the general mass.

MAIN FACTORS BESIDE THE DETERIORATION of the temple:Damage due to salt petere and

dampness in masonry structure.

VEGETAL GROWTH

Excessive rainfall caused vegetal growth which led to cracks and dislodge of masonry.

•Collapsing of main ceiling and partial collapsing of sidewall.•Settlement problem in foundation part.•Action of soluble salts like chlorides, sulphides, nitrates etc .

THREE SUCCESIVE EARTHQUAKES

Conceptual exploded viewof the temple

Page 3: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

RECONSTRUCTION DRAWINGSOF SHRI GOVINDJI TEMPLE

FRONT ELEVATION

SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATION

BACK (WEST SIDE) ELEVATION

SECTION THROUGH XX’

ROOF PLAN

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

• The plan of the temple is Rectangular.• It stands on a raised Jagati (platform).• The Bhitti is also raised straight up to the cornice.• The ceiling was made of terracotta.• Rafters made of teak wood supported the roof above the corridor (Pradakshina).

Page 4: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

MAIN DAMAGES FACED BY THE STRUCTURECOLLAPSED BARREL VAULTED ROOFThe roof collapsed after three successive earthquakes exposing the structure to further weathering hazard.

Pic: Picture showing the Main vaulted ceiling before it collapsed . (Taken from old records at site)

Pic: Shri Govindji Templeafter the vaulted ceiling collapsed.

THE CONSERVATION PROCESS

Pic: The side wall had fallen partially owing to the damaged caused by neglect as well as earthquake.

Inspired from the weavingpattern of traditionalbamboo basket, the entireform of the vault wasreconstructed with agrid of bamboo.

Original roof was 40” thick throughout till the top. The new roof starts from 15” at the base and 6” at the top, reducing the load by 200 mt.

Bamboo grid and sparingly used steel have been camouflaged by a layer of lime Surkhi.

INNER VIEW

Page 5: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

DAMPNESS AND DAMAGED FLOORING

Rising dampness on walls and floors led to further cracks and damage.

Damagedflooring

TERRACOTTA’S WATER INFILTRATION TENDENCY AND FREEZE-THAW EFFECT

Due to this tendency water get absorbed easily in the terracota work. Apart from that the extreme micro-climate of the site i.e. extreme cold and hot atmosphere leads the masonry towards breakage. VEGETATION GROWTH AND CRACKS

Cracks and crevices developed due to earthquake and was further weakened by vegetation growth.

Vegetal growth was cleared from the superstructure and thewalls were restored.

Cracked structure

was carefullydismantled, The foundation reset

and the super structure remade.

The glass “tell-tale” signs were put up over the existing cracks to study the threat of further deterioration and were foundbroken after 6 months.

Synthetic resins like silicon and epoxies were used as sealants to prevent further damage to the brick masonry from water infiltration and freeze-thaw damage.

Granite slab was inserted at plinth level to prevent the rising dampness through capillary action

Repairedflooring

Page 6: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

WOODEN BEAMS AND RAFTERS THE CONSERVATION PROCESS

The wooden rafters were restored. Completely damaged or missing rafters were replaced.

Wooden beamsand rafters were in a state of decay

MISSING BALUSTERS AND BROKEN PARAPET Wooden beams and rafters were in a state of decay.

The wooden rafterswere restored.Completelydamaged ormissing rafters werereplaced.

OTHER CONSERVATION STEPS TAKEN :BROKEN STAIRCASE AND DAMAGED DOORS

Steps and doors which are completely damaged have been reconstructed as per the photographs taken from old records at site.

16 types of bricks were found to be used in the construction of Shri Govindji Temple. Old bricks were dug out from the debris of the monument, sorted out and aired and dried. Brick bats were kept separately for crushing.

A continuous band of corbelled masonrybuttresses have been provided to strengthen the foundation against the lateral seismic force.An additional plinth protection band ofstone was provided around the structure at the ground level.

Page 7: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

 Fact File: Location - ManipurClient – Govt. of ManipurBuilt up area – 400 Sq. MetresYear of Completion - 10th march , 2010Cost of the project – 4 Crores PROJECT OBJECTIVES 

Rediscovery of the Kangla fort in the present day context To redefine Kangla fort as an ‘Archaeological Park’ through the cultural resource database 

To safeguard and protect the diverse cultural resources of the Kangla fort within existing legal framework

 To preserve, protect, restore and reuse the buildings within the fort.  

To interpret the archaeological park’s cultural and natural resources for the benefit of the people i.e., to promote its values

 To provide opportunities for learning, research, education and interpretation in the Kangla Archaeological Park. 

To provide effective management frame work for visitor use, safety and enjoyment of Kangla’s cultural and natural resources without change in cultural values.

 PROJECT METHODOLOGY The Kangla fort is a complex cultural entity as is evident by the nature of the cultural resources existing in the fort. The primary task in the project was the preliminary survey. The information management primarily involved two kinds of studies viz. the contextual and the parametric studies. Contextual study involved:

Study of Imphal by the survey team.A comprehensive natural and cultural resource inventory of the fort. The building inventory also involved condition assessment to enable estimates and project identification.Sketches of the various temples and other buildings were produced for restoration, renovation etc.Study of the local vernacular architecture.

 

Page 8: Conservation Of Govindji Temple

The analysis of the Cultural Resources Database helped in arriving at the various proposals for the Archaeological Park. The cultural resources were respectively mapped onto the base map of Kangla and the analysis of the database helped in working out the concept plan for the Archaeological project. The applicable acts and the master plan were critically studied and analyzed. This led to reworking the legalities for the proposed Kangla fort Archaeological Park within the existing framework. Apart from these studies, the other main sources of information regarding Kangla fort were gained through secondary sources, including books and old maps. The methodology adopted follows a logical and intense thought process to effectively guide the management process. The people of Manipur associate with the fort with a great deal of significance. It represents their history, culture and integrity. They wanted the fort to be reinstated to its former glory, and the use of it as a public park for the benefit of the citizens of Imphal. The location of Kangla fort and its spatial quality further justified this need. Located in the heart of the city, it would provide the most needed ‘lung-space’ for the citizens. Today, the Kangla fort has a mixture of unique cultural resources, which include the Manipuri and the British layers. The cultural resources are diverse ranging from Archaeological, Architectural, Natural and Sacred. The fort is filled with sacred ponds, trees and significant open spaces. The variety of natural and cultural resources in the fort makes it a significant green open space in the city; this diversity gives it its unique character, making Kangla one of the most important forts in the entire northeastern region. It is a potential World Heritage Site.