23
ENERGY SAVINGS THROUGH SUPPLY TRANSFORMERS Erika Wilson, Manging Director

Why Super Low Loss Amorphous Transformers are a Non-brainer for Britain’s Leading Universities

  • Upload
    emex

  • View
    76

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ENERGY SAVINGS THROUGH

SUPPLY TRANSFORMERS

Erika Wilson, Manging Director

Agenda

2

Meet Wilson Power Solutions

Why transformer losses matter: Energy savings outside the “box”

The Eco Design Directive for transformers

Super low loss amorphous transformers

Case studies & testimonials

1

2

3

4

5

Your questions answered 6

Wilson Power Solutions

• 70yrs old family run SME in 3rd generation

• Transformer & switchgear suppliers to industry

• Pioneers of super low loss amorphous technology (Wilson e2)

3

Energy Efficiency Savings – Only inside the building?

4

2.9%

Energy generated wasted through transformer losses*

Transformers are silent energy guzzlers

5 *EU27 (2008) losses amounted to 93.4 TWh

Supply transformers – Time and again overlooked

6

Transformer losses

No load losses (“core

losses”)

Permanent 24/7 from being

energised

Load losses (“winding losses”)

Product of load current

7

EU Eco Design Directive Transformers

Tougher design specifications for transformer losses • Tier 1: Effective since 1st

July 2015

• Tier 2: Effective from 1st July 2021

8

Applies to transformers “placed into the market or put into service” anywhere within the European Union.

EU Eco Design Directive Transformers

9

“National Regulating Authorities are strongly advising…..” …to allow for the installation of more efficient transformers than the regulation requires whenever these are economically justified on a whole life cycle basis…”

Our solution since 2009 - The Wilson e2 UK’s first super low loss amorphous transformer

• Amorphous metal core

• Lowest combined transformer losses

• Meeting /exceeding Tier 2 (2021) Eco Design Specifications

10

Eco Design Directive: Transformer loss comparison Size Standard loss (CRGO) pre 2015 Tier 1 – July 2015 Tier 2 – July 2021

Core

Losses [W]

Load

losses

[W]

Total

Watts

Core losses

[W]

Load losses

[W]

Total

Watts

Core

losses [W]

Load

losses [W]

Total

Watts

1000kVA 1,350 12,500 13,850 770 10,500 11,270 693 7600 8,293

%age

change -19% -26%

Products Standard Loss CRGO Txs Wilson e1 Wilson e2 amorphous

11

Amorphous core technology

CRGO

Amorphous

ámorphos: origin Greek; shapeless

• Random atomic structure

• Lower hysteresis losses

• Lower eddy current losses

12

Material comparison

13

• 10 sheets of AMT to 1 sheet CRGO

Fancy adding £35,000 to your estates bottom line?

14

1x infrastructure

decision

= 25 years of Energy Savings

Average age of a distribution transformer in UK?

15

Ofgem: 62 years = born in 1954!

Savings through TX losses: OLD energy guzzling 1970’s unit hidden on site? 33400kWh = £3170/pa**

Mitigating ~ 18t CO2 /pa*

Could be significantly more if

older *Carbon factor: 1kWh = 0.537 kg/CO2

** Cost at terminals: 1kWh = £0.095

Based on 1000kVA liquid filled transformer with 70% load

16

Guaranteed savings from reduced transformer losses

Two areas for energy savings

Potential savings through voltage management /VO

17

1.

2.

Savings Overview

18

• Constant output

voltage

• Buck & Boost

• 17 positions in 1%

steps

• Fully automatic AVR

relay

• Safety & Security of

supply

Wilson e2+with OLTC – On Load Tap Changer

19

• 6.4% voltage reduction

• Reduced transformer losses

6% electricity reduction

“Install & forget solution”

Annual savings: £31k

Wilson e2 transformer replacement – UHSM

20

For more details contact Mark Foden at UHSM

1x 2MVA transformer (Sub 1 T2)

• 7.5% voltage reduction

• Reduced transformer losses

2.6% electricity reduction

Savings: 272,949kWh

~£22,000 pa* *(0.08p /kWh)

Wilson e2 transformer replacement - McCain

21

Wilson e2 transformer replacement – University of Warwick

22

“It appealed to us to select the product with the best energy efficiency onto our estate, further given the availability of 2021 compliant transformers for what was in effect only a modest increase in capital cost over that of a 2015 compliant version, it was in reality a “no brainer” to select the e2 for two recently completed substation upgrade projects”

Electrical Design Engineer, The University of Warwick

THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS?