URBACT LABSESSION 4

Final Check

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 2

LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP3. Thinking ahead about monitoring4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool5. Explaining the “Dragons den”

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 3

LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP3. Thinking ahead about monitoring4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool5. Explaining the “Dragons den”

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 4

LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP3. Thinking ahead about monitoring4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool5. Explaining the “Dragons den”

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 1 5

WHERE ARE WE IN PLANNING CYCLE MODEL?Problems

Stakeholders

Evidence

Results

Ideas

Actions

Resources

Check

Consultation

Launch

ProblemsStakeholdersEvidenceResultsIdeasActionsResourcesCheckConsultationLaunch

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 6

COHERENCE OF LAP• WHY check?

• WHEN check?

• HOW to check…

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 7

COHERENCE OF LAP

1.

2. Expected results

Problems – Needs - Opportunities

4.Results

CHECKDo expected results correspond to problem?

CHECK: Do action supports achievement of objective?

CHECK: Do Actions contribute to achievement of results?

CHECK: Do Result contribute to solve problem/address stakeholder needs?

3.

Actions

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 8

360 DEGREE COHERENCE OF LAP

Check Results Actions

Sustainable and integrated

social are there …? are there …?

environmental are there …? are there …?

economic are there …? are there …?

cross-sectoral cross-thematic

are there …? are there …?

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 9

COHERENCE OF LAP1. Example where coherence was improved after checkingIntended results: Expansion of space capacity for mayor functions• Housing by 10.000 m²• Hotels by 5.000 m²• Social infrastructure by 3.000 m²

Conflict: Through checking it was realized that only 15.000 m² are available.

Solution: Definition of a process to coordinate which function at which location is to be realized best and monitoring that the intended results per function are not exceeded.

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 10

COHERENCE OF LAPExercise: 30 minutes

In ULSG groups (staying in this lab room) check yourAction Table and portfolio using the 2 tools.

Deliverable: adjust plan if necessary

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 11

LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP3. Thinking ahead about monitoring4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool5. Explaining the “Dragons den”

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 12

PROJECT MONITORING

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 13

GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF MONITORING1. Observing and analysing2. Reviewing the performance- output achievement3. Providing information to the general public and giving

advisory services4. Supporting evidence based decision making and taking

corrective actions

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 14

THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOLS

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 15

LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP3. Thinking ahead about monitoring4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool5. Explaining the “Dragons den”

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 16

THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOLS: ULSGULSG

Main Headings:

Frequency of meetingsOrganisation of ULSGDiversity of membersParticipation of residents, users, business…Empowerment of users, citizensOther voicesInvolvement of managing AuthoritiesLeadershipAnimation and structure of meetings

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 17

THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOLS: ULSG

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 18

THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL: ULSG

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 19

THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL: LAPProcess and governance

Content of action plan

Integrated approachFinance and project planning

EU and URBACT added value

0

0.5

1

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 20

LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP3. Thinking ahead about monitoring4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool5. Explaining the “Dragons den”

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 21

PITCHING THE LOCAL ACTION PLANS IN LAB 5

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 22

THE PRESENTATION• Each ULSG @work group selects 1-2 people to present the

LAP in 5 minutes• The presenters can use 3 pp slides, flipchart, other media• The presentation focuses on the action table developed in

Lab 3, and makes use of/reference to all portfolio materials• The presentation will be delivered to a panel of 4

representatives (1 from each of the other ULSG @work groups) and the Deputy Mayor in front of all Lab members

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 23

THE LAP PORTFOLIO• Lab 1 Problem Tree

Validated Stakeholder List• Lab 2 Expected Results

Evidence Enhancement Table• Lab 3 Action table• Lab 4 Presentation

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 24

CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS(SCORE EACH CRITERION FROM 1 TO 5)

Criteria Score1. Coherence between problem, actions and results

2. Addressing the deputy mayor’s challenge

3. Feasibility

4. Integrated approach

5. Quality of presentation

Total

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 25

THE PANEL• Each ULSG @work group selects one panel member

(different to the LAP presenters)• Each panel member is given a role (managing authorities,

private enterprises/funders, local residents...)• They listen to the presentation (5 min)• They ask questions (5 min) from the perspective of their

particular role• Questions can be asked from the floor (whole Lab group)

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 26

ULSG@WORK 4• Time• Objective: Prepare pitch• Tasks: to prepare to pitch• Tool: Portfolio+ 3 slides (written) + ????• Deliverables:• Dragons Den pitch• 1 slide Unique Selling Proposition at lunchtime

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 27

FINAL REFLECTIONS• What have you learnt?• What will you do differently in future?

URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 28