27
The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance January 29th, 2014 Liam Butler, General Manager EMEA

Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This presentation looks at how learning technologies and processes from highly regulated industries are filtering down to non compliance orientated businesses. We will focus on examples from Aviation and Life Sciences industries and how these can benefit the broader community.

Citation preview

Page 1: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

January 29th, 2014Liam Butler, General Manager EMEA

Page 2: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

What we will discussThe importance of compliance

Compliance and risk management requirements for L&D

LMS compliance and quality management features

Case studies – validating an LMS in the aviation, pharma & medical devices industries

How about non-compliance-oriented businesses?

Page 3: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Compliance-oriented industries

Page 4: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Compliance in highly-regulated industries

1. Authenticity - validated identity authentication (e.g. e-signatures or physical identification)

2. Integrity - secure infrastructure (e.g. ISO 27001)

3. Confidentiality - data privacy & control (e.g. Secure SaaS)

4. Availability - system architecture (e.g. intrusion/DOS detection & prevention)

5. Auditability - tracking & reporting

6. Regulations (e.g. 21 CFR Part 11, EU GMP equivalent)

Page 5: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

SHOW OF HANDS

How important is compliance training to your organisation? Not at allSlightly ModeratelyVeryCritically

Page 6: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

How important is your organisation’s need to demonstrate learning compliance to some external regulatory agency?

10.2%

23.5%

25.9%

40.4%

Not at all

Somewhat

Very

Critical

Source: Brandon Hall Group: BHG, Compliance, 2012 N=399

11.6%

27.9%

25.6%

34.8%

Overall EMEA

Page 7: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Preparedness is key

Highly Prepared Very highly prepared0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

High Performers

Low Performers

How prepared would you consider your organisation to be right now for a compliance audit?

Source: Brandon Hall Group: BHG, Compliance, 2012 N=399

Page 8: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

SHOW OF HANDS

How is most of your organisation’s compliance training delivered?

Custom e-learningClassroom instructionOnline simulationsVirtual classrooms

Page 9: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

How is compliance training delivered?

50.8%

30.8%

13.3%

7.5%

6.4%

4.1%8.8% Learning Management System

In-house developed system

Paper-based system

Content Management System

HR information system

Incident tracking system

Other

Source: Brandon Hall Group: BHG, Compliance, 2012 N=399

Overall

Page 10: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Compliance

Compliance is the #1 driver within highly-regulated industries

Comprehensive LMS functionality required:Access control and

e-signaturesTracking & auditingCompliance reporting

Page 11: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Key regulations

Aviation – EASA, CAA, TRTO, etc.

Finance – FCA, RDR, CII, SOX, etc.

Pharma – The GXPs (GLP, GMP, GCP)US FDA, e.g. 21 CFR Part 58, 210, 211, 820EU GMP – 9 chapters & 20 annexesUK Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

Data protection & local labour law

Page 12: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

What is compliance training? Is it quality management? Compliance training is mandated training

Often multiple sources for mandatory training Internally mandated policy Legislation

Mandated training has several actions Courses, visual observations Tests and exams Documents that must be read and formally acknowledged in the case of Standard

Operating Procedures (SOPs)

Compliance training must be documented The completion of the training must be tracked and reported The completion may be measured by attendance, progress through a course, test

results, or a learner or supervisor’s signature (e-signature).

Page 13: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Key principles of compliance

1. Say what you doHave a written procedure that states what you do

2. Do what you sayFollow the procedure If there is a deviation – write what was doneDo you need to revise the procedure?

3. Document itWritten or electronic evidence is needed to demonstrate that the

procedure was followed

Compliance Training is part of a systematic approach for an organisation to prove it is controlling and recording a documented process in line with the regulations.

Page 14: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

LMS compliance and quality management featuresSecurity

Hosting – infrastructure (the role of SaaS)User verification – tokens, IP address, etc.Application security – vendor audit

Audit TrailEvidence of behavior

E-Signatures

Certifications – exams, training & SOPs

Reporting & Analytics

Page 15: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Modern trends in real-world management of compliance Preparation: Plan for regulation specific requirements (such

as 21 CFR 21 Part 11)

Common management processes: Step 1: Communicating Requirements to UsersStep 2: Pushing Out Compliance TrainingStep 3: Monitoring Compliance and Follow-upStep 4: Optional validation and auditing

Page 16: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Pushing out compliance training

Not common: Self enrollment

Manager-based assignment Common: Administrator identification and bulk/batch

assignment. Not Common: External Batch Assignment (perhaps file from

external system) Very Common: Rules-based Assignment (e.g. new employees

with job title “Branch Manager”) Very Common: Automated. For example, expiration of a

certificate results in automatic new enrollment .

Page 17: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Communicating requirements to usersMost Common Technique: Push out requirements to users versus

self enrollment (next slide)

Email Notifications (bulk direct, automated, rules based)

Graphical Learning Path

Multiple Implementation Strategies Assign Individual Modules/Exams Define Complex Programs (mandatory and optional blended learning) Certifications for ease of tracking status and renewals, grace periods,

etc. Talent (Job Profiles/Competencies)

Page 18: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Monitoring compliance and follow-upCommon: Set deadlines/expiration: automatic email

notifications alert managers and administrators

Most admins: Drill-down Analytics

Common: Ad-hoc and Regularly Scheduled (often weekly) reports distributed to managers

Common: Re-enroll automated handling versus email notification handling

Page 19: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

SHOW OF HANDS

Does your organisation conduct training gap analysis/risk assessment for compliance?

Yes No I don’t know

Page 20: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Compliance – theimpact of analytics CLIENT

Nuffield Health is the UK’s largest not for profit healthcare organisation 31 private hospitals, as well as a chain of fitness and well-being gyms in 200 locations in

the UK Over 10,000 employees

CHALLENGE Enterprise-wide risk management (“Automatic Compliance Engine”) Actionable compliance analytics based on individual employee risk profile

Automatically generated training plan custom to each employee Notification alerts to employee & business line manager Ongoing risk reporting to governance subcommittees and board stakeholders

RESULTS Solution: NetDimensions Learning & NetDimensions Performance (SaaS) Differentiators: Configurability, continuous innovation, overall TCO De-facto risk & compliance management platform Four-fold increase in auto-enrolments in compliance training, cost savings of £465,000 yearly

(based on streamlining learning)

Page 21: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Piecemeal collection of products Organically developed, fully integrated suite

One-size-fits-all Fully configurable for a personalized user experience in 34 languages

Monolithic, closed system Open architecture with public APIs &best-of-breed integrations

Inability to scale in complex environments Ideal for highly regulated industries withboth on premise and secure SaaS options

Limited mobile capabilities Comprehensive mobile offeringincluding on tablets & smartphones

Hidden ongoing costs =>low customer satisfaction “No client left behind” pledge

Other Solutions NetDimensions Talent Suite

Why NetDimensions

Page 22: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Our market focus

Page 23: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Our Market Focus – Compliance

Page 24: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

Product portfolio – focused on compliance

Page 25: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

How about non-compliance-oriented businesses?

Compliance covers a wide range of strategic and operational needs in many types of businesses.

Many of the techniques related to compliance also apply to simple “business requirements” management in non-regulated industries.

Automated management really does help in resource constrained or widely dispersed organisations!

Page 26: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

A few suggestions to make compliance easier

1. Talk to your legal team and compliance officer to better understand who is responsible and what.

2. Define clear requirements and objectives for the training and LMS implementation.

3. Question your vendor and demand a software validation for the LMS.

4. Make compliance an on-going part of your business via well-defined workflows

Page 27: Learning technologies 2014: The Trickle Down Effect of Compliance

QUESTIONS?