View
136
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Georges RADJOU (BIRD CEO) has design a universal wage. In principle, it is for the Annual Ministerial Review (Part 3, United Nations)- The Indicator of Sustainable developmen tin Post 2015 MDGs and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be quite a popular issue. Who has not dreamed to be paid for an activity as equally as his business employer. In fact, the Indicator of universal wage, which is a wage for all, for their contribution as outcome of societal participation aimed at reducing the gap between rich people (high paid caliber workers) and poor people the low paid workers- Therefore thus a universal wage, with a limited number of pillar- The desin of the indicator is based on 2 indicators: one to tell people, whe their wages is not enough i.e. the purchasing power is insufficient compared to the cost of living. Opposite, the indicator to tell you earn too much, and they are too many poors. So, you should not react if there is pay cut (particularly) if all your needs have been already satisfied. Tese are for the top earners, whose leaving standards have been multiplied by a great number i.e 3, 5, 10 folds of basic workers wage and needw.
Citation preview
A POSSIBLE UNIVERSAL WAGE INDICATOR
By Georges RADJOU CEO MBA DUPEBH
http://fr.slideshare.net/gsradjou
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
INDICATOR FOR A POSSIBLE UNIVERSAL WAGE CONSTRUCTION
Indicators to be used with SDGs (also Paris Declaration and could be used for Post Busan and developpment It is about development cooperation. The indicator is ''assessing provision on historical current and future ressources''
Sources : Pied de poule p.p (maritime studies), China pension reform (Professor Xuejin Zuo), Highoutput Management, Adrew Grove, Intel CEO)
In which direction the organization is heading ? This is the question ! An indicator should be able to tell, by anticipation before you reache the goal, where your organization is heading. I have constructed an indicator, which looks for me like the story of the bicycle rider. Either it is watcing the road or not !
(Wrong Indicators rarely tells the truth (where your organization is heading)- If your organization falls, it is likely because your were not watching at an indicators- Your organiation was watching everything, except an indicator. So, I developed a possible indicator for a Universal wages by looking at what matter in Post 2015 MDGs and Sustainable Development Goals (after 2015) and the Development agreed goals (Some legal basis are already existing)
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Set of slides (Part A)
● SOME ASPECTS OF CHINA 5 PILLAR PENSION FUND MODELING THROUGH THE LENS OF PROFESSOR ENTREPRENEUR XUEJIN ZUO PROPSOED REFORM FRAMEWORK
● USED SELECTING AND MODELING AN INDICATOR FOR AN UNIVERSAL WAGE
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
SDG indicator global architecture : criteria and performance specifications
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
● SOME ASPECTS OF CHINA 5 PILLAR PENSION FUND MODELING THROUGH THE LENS OF PROFESSOR ENTREPRENEUR XUEJIN ZUO PROPSOED REFORM FRAMEWORK
● YOU WILL COMPARE IT WITH MY OWN SET OF INDICATOR FOR POST 2015 MDGS AND SDGs
● THE IDENTICAL PART IN BOTH THE PENSION REFORM MODEL AND THE INDICATOR IS THE MECAHNISM OF PIED-POULE I .E . THE SAFETY DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOAT AND THE SEA FLOOR.
● THIS PRESENTATION IS A GROSS PHASE PROJECT (BUSINESS CASE OF INDICATOR) . A FURTHER DEVELOPMENT COULD BE INVESTIGATED BY MODELING THE PENSION FUND AND THE INDICATOR OF WAGES WITH MATHEMATICAL EQUATION-
● IT IS NOT DIFFICULT - BUT FOR THE MOMENT I JUST STAY ON THAT LEVEL OF THE EXPLANATION- WHICH ARE THE SOURCES OF THE MODEL
=> PERSONALLY, WHAT UN LACKS ARE MODELS- THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH MODEL TO COVER VARIETY OF EXPERIENCE IN SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONEMENTAL SYSTEMS
=> ALSO, UN LACKS OF EVIDENCE BASED POLICY IN NETWORKS
➔ MATHEMATICAL MODELING CAN USE DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS FOR ONE OR SEVERAL VARIABLES. I THINK THE ISSUE IN THE REFORM OF BOTH PENSION FUND AND INDICATORS ARE LIMITED BY INTERFACES BETWEEN DIFERENT ENVIRONEMENT
➔ WHICH IS THE SOURCE OF RISKS. HOW TO ENSURE A SMALL UNCERTAINTY IN THE METRICS ? HOW TO ENSURE THAT SYSTEMS ARE CONTINUOUS AND HOMOGENOUS ?;;;;
Indicator to avoid to react to shortage Shortage start
Risk of disruption = shortage end
Not enough resources = Shortage
Resource reserve
Indicator of shortage
Zone of riskanticipation
I (max)
I (min)
Action = business as usual
Flow out
Precautionary measures
No precuationary measures
Total resources
To further exploration(deep ressource exploration)
Resource used
Sustainable development process
Consumption
ProductionConservation
+ Preservation
Initial resource
Final reource
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATION IN THE MANEGEMENT OF THE PLANET RESOURCES
Assessment of future resources
Assessment of current resources
Assessment of historicalresources
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
My question is the reform survival ? (Which reform) Stable or unstable? Who is in command of the pension funds (Chinese, bosses, Communism Party, fund organizations, workers)
WHICH SEGMENT OF THE CHINESE SOCIETY IS EMPOWERED BY THE PENSION REFORM AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE OLD SYSTEM INTO A
NEW ONE- WHO ARE THE WINNERS AND THE LOOSERS, OR ARE EVERY STAKEHOLDERS
EMPOWERED BY THE REFORM- OR IS IT JUST AN ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM OR A REFORM UNDER
THE HAND OF THE EMPLOYERS ;
When professor XUEJIN ZUO presented his pension reform with the 5 pillars, he meant that China reform
would be balnced -as Chinese people love equilibrium like ''Ying'' and ''Yang'' of Chinese philoqophy that
made the Chinese nation
;
.
Professor Xuejin Zuo sees the pesnion reform as an elment of stability wtih a strength and a weekness
THE SPIRIT OF THE REFORM ACORDING IS THE BALANCE AND EQUILIBRIUM REFORM SO IT SERVES ALL (XUEJIN ZUO Research Professor and former Executive Vice president, shanghai Academy of SocIal Sciences (SASS)
Pension Reform in China/ 5 Pillars of Transformation
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Individual pension
Cost(Fixed)
Benefitvariable
Good pension
Bad pension
Branch 1 branch 2
BEFORE THE REFORM
Does the pension take the wealthInto account
Big Wealth
Small wealth
Aim of the reform
New pension system
Benefit
Small costs
Does the reform take into account peoples wealth- What is the wealth Gap in communist capitalist country ?
THE SETTING OF TJE PILLARS (WHICH PILLARS)
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Level of participation and contribution
Job Branch Pensions
(Un)Formal sector tend to not participate
….They have their own....
Branch (a) branch (b) branch (c) branch (d)
Not contributory (poor peoples) 3
2 NRP
NWR
PUWS 1(Workers)
Endebted peoplesNo money, old peoples > 65 years old
2 Workers
Maximum (M)
Minimum(m)
M + m 2
INNOVATIVE REPRESENTATION OF CHINA PENSION FUND REFORM
Part A
Part B
Part C
Part D
Part E
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
CHINESE PENSION RISK
FACTORS OF RISKJOBREVENUE
MARKET TRANSPARENCY
GROWTH RATEECONOMY
JAPAN CARRY TRADE BETWEEN USA AND CHINA
INTERNATIONALEXCHANGE
AND FINANCE
RISK > 0(opportunities)RISK > 0(opportunities)
Wages compositon (ratio social and individual return
DANGER !!!
Illegal worksMigration, TrafickingUnformal sectorCorruption
Unformal sector
Legally not contributing peoples
Industry Branch (private pension)Self contributory
VULNERABLES (Poor, disabled, marginals, Over 65
Workers, Staffs
workers
Training, skillsWorking hours
RISK OF THE REFORM
ECONOMY
Vulnerables
DANGER
Opportunity
Source : BIRD CEO
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Set of slides (Part B)
● Indicator of Sustainable Development Goal(s) -SDGs
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Organization Indicator
MAXIMUM(Over reacting Indicator
MINIMUM(Shortage Indicator)
INDICATOR (I)PAIRING INDICATOR
Flow of ressource (overtime)
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Proposition for Indicator of Sustainable development (number one)
● Case of a proposed indicator for universal wage in the Post 2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Indicator to avoid to react to shortage Shortage start
Risk of disruption = shortage end
Not enough resources = Shortage
Resource reserve
Indicator of shortage
Zone of riskanticipation
I (max)
I (min)
Action = business as usual
Flow out
Precautionary measures
No precuationary measures
Total resources
To further exploration(deep ressource exploration)
Resource used
Sustainable development process
Consumption
ProductionConservation
+ Preservation
Initial resource
Final reource
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATION IN THE MANEGEMENT OF THE PLANET RESOURCES
Assessment of future resources
Assessment of current resources
Assessment of historicalresources
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
The 3 pillars of Sustainable Development
ECOLOGY
ECONOMY SOCIETY
ISO SUSTAINBAILITY
3 PILLARS WITH THE SAME WEIGHT
Sustainability centred on economyWith a relative value for ecology and poor representation ofsociety
(2, 3,1)(E, E, S) =
SDG
EconomicPillarEconomicPillar
EconomicPillar
EconomicPillar
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Set of slides (Part C)
● A possible indicator for a Universal Wage in Post 2015 MDGs and Sustainable Development framework
ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSAL WAGE
1- CHINA PENSION REFORM2- BASIC INCOME (FRANCE)
The PROJECT OF the Indicator of Universal Wage for Post 2015 MDGs and Sustainble Development Goal(s) is an hybrid organization indicator from the combining concepts/
Concept 1: professor entrepreneur Xuejin Zuo, and his 5 pillars pension fund reform in China. (UNIRISD) – it is a project, which is not yet prototyped, as there is no approval yet from the Chinese government.
Concept 2 : existing project, which has been implemented and it is assessed on a regular basis. For some national stakeholders, France basic income is suspected to make people lazy -as they are not willing to seek for work. (in German economy, the Chancellor has introduced a basic income, recently. But, Germany has a more flexible employment market compared to France (due to the SMIC and France social model, (An economist in prospective said France was the most socialist country in Europe, at the moment)
CONCEPT 1 + CONCEPT 2 CONCEPT OF UNIVERSAL WAGESource : BIRD CEO
INTRODUCTION
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Firstly to understand how universal wage i.e. a salary for all can work, one needs to understand a bit of maritime study
● Pied-poule in maritime study is an analogy with the purchasing power in economy, both are abbreviated with p.p. (in my assumption)
Source : BIRD CEO
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Hypotheseses for a possible universal wage
● Origin of the reform-
● H1 : The pillar of the living in society (Adam Smith) does not exist today- a principle on which society was structured and defined (Sociology). If the wealth of nations do not exist, but the industrialization process has kept growing- so, it is normal that societies have aged- without reforming the initial Adam Smith paradigm (specialization of citizen and exchanges of goods between the citizen based on relative comparative avantges)
● Recall the paradigm-if I am good at making bread, and you are good at driving a car, we both have a comparative avantage- it is best for the whole society that we specialize and exchange- I make the bread for you, and you drive for me (and for others too)
● Today, this hypothesis has been missing-
● H2 : the purchasing power of organization is the living standard compared to the cost of life- In fact, it is not what matter in my assumption to build an Univerasl wage- What is paramount is to consider that the capital accumulation during of whole life can be assimilated to a risk < 0 or a risk >0
● Which I have compared with the Pied Poule of Maritime study-
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Pied-poule ?
SAIL
p-p (Pied poule) ?
Surface of the sea level
BoatHigh tide
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Average tide
Lowest limit of the tideSea floor
Lowesr part of the boat
The master boat, which is represnting the organization within its natural, technical, politica, economic, humanitarain, cultural... environment
Narrative of the journey of an organization (case of a boat)- but it is similar for any organization except the energy uses (wind, oil, nuclear, muscles,....)My assumption is within the framework of Sustainble development Goal- So, I have prioritize a boat with a sail under the influence of the wind
NARRATIVE of a boat, which is representng the organisation and that wanted to set sail-
SET SAILING means ''having enough energy (purchasing power) (p.p) to satisfy the need of the organization.
But, they are issues during the boat trip, because the sea goes up and down acording to the tide (fluctuation of the economies and the growth, and the organization is following is objectibes -goals- for example, like in the slide it wanted to go through ''a pass'' i.e. manage a transformation or a change- It was confronted with the small pied poule- (purchasing power)
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEOSource : BIRD CEO
Pied de Poule (''pied poule'' i.e. p.pfor ''chicken leg/foot''
p.p means also the Purchasing Power (p.p)
The Chicken leg in the assessment of an
Univeral salary -wage-
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
p.p. = 0
p.p. > 0
Universal Wagep.p. < 0
Conclusion = universal wage is equivalent to pied poule (p.p.) = 0 at all time (and for all)
Strategies
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Optimistic
Neutral
Pessimistic
pessimsticoptimistic
neutral
Sea floor
Lowest part of the boat(s)
In solidarity economy, which ''pied poule'' strategy (scenario) will help to build a Universal wage (and what is the indicator ?)
SCENARIO 1 PP>0 WEALTH ACCUMULATION AT DEATH
IS IT WORTH TO AHVE ACCUMUALTED MONEY WHEN YOU PASSED YOU LEAVE WITH NOTHING
SCENARIO 2 PP < 0 YOU ARE LIKELY TO PASSED POOR AND FULL OF DEBTS
IS IT NORAL IN A SOLIDARITY ECONOMIES THAT SOME MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY CNA RUIN THEIR LIFE WHILE THEY COULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE GROWTH
SCENARIO 3 PP = 0I PASSED AND I LIVED
PEOPLE PASSING DO NOT OWN AND DO NOT ACCUMULATE IT IS CORRESPONDING TO A BALANCE, WHICH IS THE STATUS OF UNIVERSAL WAGE
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
What is p.p ?
● By concept ● In words
p.p
Distance between the end of the boat
and the sea floor (Indicator I (sf) With math/ p.p. = I eb – I sf
I (sf)
I (eb)
I (eb)
p.p
Pied de poule
Purchasing power
Chicken leg
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Set of slides (Part D)
Conclusion and Recommendation :
The indicator for a Universal wage
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
How to transfer from purchasing power (pp) to universal wage
● It is not difficult- as one can observe that p.p.● Is the security measure to protect the organization from
''wreckage'' (like a boat) i.e bankruptcy, downsizing, closure, turmoil....
● Indicator p.p (pied poule = purchasing power) is either positive (p.p. > 0) or negative (p.p. < 0) – and eventually p.p = 0 -
● Interpreting p.p (pied poule ''for the french maritime word which is the safe distance betwen the boat and the sea floor when the vessel sets sail, in term of economy, it is the equivalent of the organization i.e. individual, household, firm, NGO, governments....purchasing power)
SEE ORGANIZATION INDICATOR
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Recommendation: The indicator for Universal wageRemark : I did not study the the indicator risks
WHICH ARE PRETTY LIKELY TO RESEMBLE TO THE CHINESE PENSION RFORM RISKS
ON INDICATOR
THEREFORE MY RECOMMENDATION IS TO PROTOTYPE THE UNIVERSAL WAGE IN A STEP BY STEP PROCESS BEFORE WIDE SPREAD AND IMPLEMENTATION.
➔ It is particularly true when the ressources will be redcued (not sustainable), but better acting now to anticipate
➔ paid jobs have been replaced by activities, quality jobs And rewarding people on the merit and quality activities.
➔ This indicator is/are 2 indicator(s) one of shortage for the purchasing power and one for preventing organization to react to purchasing power shortage. Therefore thus, universla wage is open to negotiation too (in the green economy with SDGs
➔
➔ PURCHASING POWER => HOW CAN I GET FROM MY UNIVERSAL WAGE ACCORDING TO MY LIVING STANDARDS => THE ANSWER IS LIKELY TO BE THE PIED -POULE
➔ IT IS A GAP BETWEEN THE PRODUCTION MODEL AND THE COSNTRUCTION MODEL WHICH IS THE COMMUNTY RESILIENCE
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Organization Indicator
MAXIMUM(Over reacting Indicator
MINIMUM(Shortage Indicator)
INDICATOR (I)PAIRING INDICATOR
Flow of ressource (overtime)
P.P
PIED POULE
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
Comparing the Organization Indicator OI = (Imax, Imin) with the Organization Pied Poule
OPP = Ieb – IsfOI = (I max, I min)
OI = OPP => Ieb = I max
and Isf = I min
The life cycle ofThe organization
opp
I max
Imin
INDICATOR
Pied pouleor the organization Purchasing power
Ieb
Isf
Organization OI Organization OPP
ORGANIZATION ENVIRONEMENT
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) IndicatorAnnual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
On viewpoint of agents of the markets
Nothing has changed, the Universal wage will be under negotiation of stakeholders
The Universal indicator model is likely to be used like a buffer model, with ressource in and ressource out in order to fix the value of the Universal wages
Universal wage is likely to look like a credit point passpeort which organization need to refill, recharge retore, reuse and resplenish
Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) 2014 – Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicator
Source : BIRD CEO
EnD
03/20/2014