Upload
prakhar-jain
View
467
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Illustrates what caused a mayhem at HP when the new CEO brought about changes which were drastically different from the existing culture at the company. The incidents have been related to organisational behaviour theories and principles
Citation preview
HP at Cultural Crossroads‘HP Way’ or ‘CarlyWay’ ?
Group 5: Ketaki, Himanshu J, Himanshu K, Rashi, Prakhar, Saurabh J
THE HP WAY – ANALYSING HP CULTUREHP’s Organizational Values
1. Management by Objective Each stakeholders from every level needs to contribute to company’s goals by developing objectives
2. Open Door PolicyFreedom to express concerns
3. Open CommunicationPromoting teamwork by giving right training and information
4. Management by WanderingManagers walking through the employees regularly, keeping in touch with employees via impromptu get together
HP’s Corporate Objectives:
5. ProfitProfit by means of increasing perceived good value by customers; always reinvested profits back into the company; no debts taken for the company directly
6. CustomersMutual respect, effective response to customer needs.
7. Field of InterestBusinesses which help continue HP’s tradition of self financing
8. GrowthGrowth for shareholder value and achieve business objectives
9. PeopleJob Security, Job satisfaction ,sharing of success with employees
10.CitizenshipImportance of being a good corporate citizen in each country of operation
Collaborative Approach oriented towards Team Work with importance to people andvalues
Employees, if perfectly, motivated work towards creating breakthrough innovation
Employees, if not motivated well, aim at bringing in products with minor revisions into the market more frequently to acquire the incentive.
Pro
’s
Con’s
- Prevents complacency, if the company is leading in the sector and has no major competitor. - Frequent bonuses keeps the employees motivated to work better.
- Much less chances of registering a huge profit as compared to the competitors when company is not performing well- Will lead to cut down on employee bonuses- Lowered Morale of employees
Pro
’s
Con’s
THE HP POLICIES – PRO’S & CON’S
TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION
COMPENSATION POLICY
Incentives for employees linked to number of
innovations.
Bonuses given out when the company beats its own
numbers of revenue
Sales Compensation Structure based on performance Feedback based Pay - 360° Feedback concept
Revitalizing HP Labs – Focus on Patents
Cost Prudent Functioning
Competitor Performance based BonusLaid of 1,700 + 3,000 + 6000 Employees (Jan, Apr, Jul) Voluntary Pay Cuts or Forced Vacations
Structured Manager – Employee Ratio
HP – Compaq Merger
THE CARLY WAY
Positivity:- True leadership driving a massive culture transformation.-Necessary for Survival – Industry Standards as benchmark- The new HP way would need people to work together, move faster, and be nimble.- Required HP to master the commoditized technology business instead of sticking to its old innovation driven engineering business.- Focusing on Innovation
Negativity- No Team Work- No Empowerment of employee- Degrading moral value of organization- Dissatisfaction within employees- Too much competence culture- Destroying company’s cherished culture- Hire & Fire policy-Fearful & uncertain working environment
Carly Way & Its Effects -
Finding
‘Way’
Criticism from
AnalystsEmploye
e Grievanc
es
Resistance from
Stakeholders
Falling Profits
Share Price
Stagnant
Revenues
•More flexibility and understanding to bring about a gradual change.Gradual Change
•Taking inputs from experienced managers and making them a part of decision makingCoalition
•Understand the core culture and not mistake its understanding by what seems apparent. Core Culture
•Understanding the employees , the work culture and the organizational value system.Value System
•Creating and Communicating new VisionVision
•Consolidation of results of small changes before new changesStep by Step
•Performance & Feedback based Pay systems created more stir.Compensation
•Could have made efforts to ensure employee satisfaction .Employee
Satisfaction•Subtle Cost Cutting MeasureCost Cutting
Inclusive Change
WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE DIFFERENTLY?