Upload
nhsscotlandevent2013
View
350
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
See more on the 2013 NHSScotland Event website http://www.nhsscotlandevent.com/resources/resources2013/resources
Citation preview
Lead to succeed
Jean HartleyProfessor of Public Leadership
Open University
NHS Scotland conference June 2013
Aims of this session
• To consider the current context of public services, as the starting point to understand leadership
• To examine leadership with political astuteness as a way to address collaboration across interests which are sometimes aligned but sometimes competing
• To reflect on when and how political astuteness fosters effective leadership and engagement with the workforce and other stakeholders
Tough times in Europe and the USA• Global financial crisis• Triple-dip recession…. Economic depression• Families and communities under stress • Increase in coercive, bullying and blaming cultures in
some workplaces• High unemployment and under-employment• Health and social care challenges due to an ageing
population, with chronic illness etc• Climate change • Loss of trust in professions, politicians and institutions• Loss of hope and sense of direction in society
5
The leadership challenges
• The crucial distinction between ‘tame’ and ‘wicked’ problems (Rittell and Webber, 1973; Grint, 2000; Hartley and Benington, 2010)
• Tame problems – complicated but resolvable; likely to have occurred before; agreed approaches to address. Leadership role is provide processes and resources to solve the problem
• Wicked problems – complex, interconnected with other problems; lack of agreement over problem or how to tackle it. Leadership role – ask the right questions and get the right stakeholders involved.
What do we mean by leadership?
Person
Position
Process
Performance
Projection
Leadership – not solely about people in
particular positions or their qualities but
about the mobilising of the attention,
resources and practices of others towards
particular goals, values and outcomes.
What counts as successful leadership? • Public leadership is often controversial and contested,
and with (at any point) the full glare of publicity• Multiple and complex goals – and many “wicked”
problems• Is successful leadership where goals have been met?
Where public value has been created? Where the next generation of leadership is created?
• Who decides on what is success? Over what time-frame?
• Attributions can vary
Collaboration to achieve quality in healthcare• Collaboration is important in the context of wicked
problems (complex, not clear about cause or solution to problems, may not have been encountered before)
• But collaboration is not easy, and it is not just about finding common ‘win-win’ approaches, sometimes there are conflicts which have to be resolved between collaboration partners
• And sometimes partners and other stakeholders do not want to collaborate
• So political astuteness is a critical skill for leadership
Political astuteness
political ‘n
ous’
political acuity
political intelligence
‘Metis’
savvy
Dealing with big p
and small p politics
Political awareness
Political antennae
5 KEY QUESTIONS TO EXPLORE
What are the situations in which leaders use political awareness skills in their jobs?
What do we mean by politics in the workplace?
What are the key components of the skills of political awareness?
How do leaders acquire and develop their political skills?
Can public servants lead with too much political astuteness?
Three research projects:1) UK on managers across all sectorsJoint research with the Chartered Management Institute (UK
professional body for managers) Literature review – Managing with political awareness Hartley and
Branicki, 2006 3 focus groups (London, Birmingham, Cardiff) – 41 senior managers National survey of senior managers, n= 1,495 12 interviews Review by Steering Board
Report: Leading with political awareness (2007), launched at the House of Lords. Journal papers and book chapters.
Co-authors: Jean Hartley, Clive Fletcher, Christoph Ungemach, Petra Wilton and Patrick Woodman
2) UK, Australia, New Zealand with public managers
3 country study
• 1012 responses to the survey • 42 interviews with very senior, senior and middle ranking
public servants across UK, Oz and NZ
• Co-authors: John Alford (Melbourne) Owen Hughes (RMIT), Sophie Yates (ANZSOG);
• Report to be published in August. Also journal papers and a book chapter in press.
3) Research on close working by senior civil servants with elected (and appointed) politicians
• 17 interviews with Permanent Secretaries in central and devolved government, and chief executives in local government in all 4 countries of UK
• Leading with political astuteness in daily working with elected politicians
• Report “Dancing on Ice” being published in July by Stella Manzie and Jean Hartley
THE CHALLENGEManagers and leaders increasingly have to work with a range of
stakeholders outside as well as inside the organization Strategic alliances and formal partnerships Commissioned or contracted out services run by agencies or
contractors Lobby and advocacy groups Professional and trade union groups Regulators Global governance institutions The media Formal political institutions (e.g. local councils, Scottish Parliament,
Westminster government, EU)And so on
Leading with political astuteness for managers
“Greater priority needs to be given to developing leaders with the capacity to manage the political dimension. They need an ability to see and communicate the big picture, make connections, be credible with different groups and broker relevant political and strategic relationships.”
(Charlesworth et al, 2003)
“Political skills cannot be viewed as the domain of the specialist, but as a mainstream element of leadership needed across all sectors”
(Sir David Varney)
Improving leadership theoryTraditional leadership theory emphasises: Leading a single organization rather than leading in a
network of organizations and stakeholders A leader has formal authority over those they lead rather
than sometimes only influence Assumes leader’s role is to bring everyone on board,
rather than lead in conditions of diverse, and sometimes competing, interests
Leader’s control over the boundaries of the organization rather than porous boundaries with influence on your organization
Leading with political astuteness breaks out of these traditional assumptions
What is meant by politics in the workplace?
The literature – traditional and emergent perspectives in managementFrom the management literature: Early view - politics no place in management Politics as the pursuit of self interest (‘politicking’) Politics as a means to gain market share – ‘turf wars’
From the political science literature: Politics as a public mechanism for distribution of
resources Politics in the pursuit of common purposes, and
reconciling differences Politics to align objectives; building sufficient
consensus for action
Leadership with political astuteness
Newer perspectives on politics in the management field
eg Baddeley and James, Butcher and Clarke, Hartley and Fletcher, Hartley and Alford
“Leadership both inside and outside the organization, based on working with diverse and sometimes competing interests and agendas from a range of stakeholders, to achieve organizational and social outcomes.” (Hartley and Fletcher, 2008)
The self-interested aspects of political awareness – sometimes called the ‘dark side’ of politics - remain a reality
UK survey data – “what do you understand by politics in your work as a manager”(up to 3 responses per person)
Alliance-building to achieve organizational objectives
59%
Formal processes and institutions of government
40%
Ways in which different interests are reconciled 39%
Scanning factors in external environment that organization needs to consider
38%
People ‘protecting their turf’ 31%
Pursuit of personal advantage 21%
Comparative analysis: Public servantsAustralia, New Zealand, UK (n = 1012)
Interviews (ANZUK study) • P08 (senior manager, AU): “[Politics is] primarily about
mobilising support for a course of action. Now that might be support within the organisation, that is not people that you either work for or work for you directly necessarily, but that broader base of support. It could be mobilising support in political office.”
• P06 (senior manager, AU) “it’s about how in fact you engage with those stakeholders in order to achieve what you’re trying to achieve for the organisation as a whole in support of what community objectives are.”
UK Survey data – Situations where political skills most applied (15 choices) (% saying valuable or very valuable)
Working with influential people in your organization
76%
Working with partners and strategic alliances 73%
Thinking about how public opinion has an impact on your organization
68%
Working with regional or local government 62%
Influencing regulation in your sector 62%
George Eliot’s view of politics in Felix Holt“Fancy what a game of chess would be if all the chessmen had passion and intellects, more or less small and cunning; if you were not only uncertain about your adversary’s means, but a little uncertain about your own; if your knight could shuffle himself on to a new square by the sly; if your bishop, in disgust at your castling, could wheedle your pawns out of their places; and if your pawns, hating you because they are pawns, could make away with their appointed posts that you might get checkmate on a sudden…….
Felix Holt (cont’d)
…..You might be the longest-headed of deductive reasoners, and you might be beaten by your own pawns. You would be especially likely to be beaten, if you depended arrogantly on your mathematical imagination, and regarded your passionate pieces with contempt.”
What are the key componentsof skill
Warwick developed and validated a model of the key skills of leadership with political astuteness
(now available as a diagnostic tool)
50 items in a measure of political astuteness as practised by middle and senior managers
Asked people to rate themselves – and the most senior managers in their organization they
worked with
A skills framework
Strategic Direction and Scanning
Reading People and Situations
Building Alignment and Alliances
Interpersonal Skills
Personal Skills
Personal skills Interpersonal skills
Reading people and situations
Building alignment and
alliances
Strategic direc-tion and scan-
ning
OVERALL0
1
2
3
4
54.18 4.17 3.98
3.92 3.98 4.043.54 3.59 3.95 3.56 3.68 3.66Self – mean score
Others – mean score
self and other ratings on the five dimensions and the total score
Pers
onal
Inte
rpers
onal
People
& S
ituat.
..
Alignm
ent
& a
ll...
Str
ate
gic
dir
ec.
..
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
3.99
3.63.7 3.7 3.7
4.2 4.24 4 4
4.3 4.34.1 4.1
4.2
Middle Mgrs
Senior Mgrs
Directors
Differences in political skills ratings by managerial level
Pers
onal
Inte
rpers
onal
People
& S
ituat.
..
Alignm
ent
& a
ll..
.
Str
ate
gic
dir
ecti
on
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
4.18 4.123.96 3.92 3.994.16 4.22
3.99 3.93 3.91
Male
Female
Political skill scores by gender
How did you develop your own political skills?
What have been the events, experiences, courses, etc (inside or outside your organization) which have been most important to you in developing your own political skills?
Survey data – Top sources of developing political skills (% very or extremely valuable; 24 possible sources)
Learning from own mistakes 88%
Gaining experience in the job 86%
Handling crises 85%
Good example of senior manager 77%
Bad example of a senior manager 70%
Working with other organizations 67%
Experiential learning is particularly important “I think it’s very much a living thing. I don’t feel I’ve learnt a
huge amount from reading textbooks, I’ve learnt it from people, watching them, observing them, and I suppose just life experience.”
(business development manager, facilities management company)
“I talk a lot with my boss, who is very developmental. We talk about what happened in meetings and I ask why did you do this, why not that, and it really helps.”
(Local government manager).
Key recommendations for development, given scarcity of current routes
Individual managers – Increase exposure to politically complex situations– Reflection/observation skills– Coaching and mentoring from a politically astute angle
Organisations– Audit political context/skills– Create climate for experiential learning
Professional bodies / training providers– Use a political astuteness skills framework– Use the CMI self-assessment and 360 assessment instrument
Can public servants lead with too much political astuteness?
What are the limits of political astuteness – in ethical terms, in effectiveness terms?
• Interviewees reported that some colleagues got too close to ministers, or were ‘game-playing’, or were not seen as trustworthy
• But also that too little political astuteness was problematic – not seeing the interests of others
Public servants reported:
• Reviewing the political context with their close team• Using a coach to reflect on ethics and politics• Being reflexive as a habit of mind• Checking that their actions would be explainable to
family, or the media • Reflecting on codes of conduct
They used their political astuteness to check that they were not being too politically astute.
“It’s the very air we breathe” (AU)
Limits to leadership with political astuteness
Acceptable Political
Astuteness
Too Compliant to the politician being served: not independent enough
Too rigidly promulgating formal boundaries without reflecting
appropriate political astuteness
Not political enough: Professional expertise
without political astuteness
Not professional enough: political astutenesswithout technical
expertise
Conclusions
There is an increasing recognition that political astuteness is a key skill for leaders/managers as they lead in situations with diverse interests in a dynamic context
This research represents the first major mapping of the contexts and skills
Development routes are haphazard and often painful – we can do more to make explicit the skills and help people acquire these skills
Further information and papers:
Jean Hartley Professor of Public LeadershipDepartment of Public Leadership & Social EnterpriseOpen University Business SchoolOpen UniversityWalton HallMilton KeynesMK7 6AA
www.open.ac.uk