Upload
paul-douard
View
737
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
We present in this document our understanding of the e-book market in 2010 and how it is likely to evolve.
Citation preview
1
The competition will lie on consumer’s capturing
4. Competitors would bargain less costly e-books with publishers because of high rate of fixed costs in the e-book market. • Apple will not change its strategy • Other e-book readers manufacturers can hardly compete this business model because they are not the 1st
movers and will try to adopt a competitive business model or add functionalities.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. The current market analysis shows: • Apple succeeds in its skimming strategy • Amazon fails in its volume strategy (iPad being 1st on devices market) • Competition on e-books forces Amazon to incur losses
2. Perspectives over 5 years show that: • Amazon won’t be profitable and will lose market shares both in e-book and devices markets (10% on devices and
16% on e-books) • iPad will maintain its high profitability on both markets (55% on devices and 30% on e-books). 3. As an investment fund, do not underestimate Amazon’s perspectives! Amazon should adopt a razor & blade business model in locking in the customer through a monthly subscription and better fitting the digital environment (expected average profitability per year over 5 years: $143 M)
Ø Attracting more readers by selling the kindle cheap (objective: market penetration rate of 25% in 2015) Ø Improving the profitability per reader ($288/Reader/year) Ø Convincing publishers to enter in this win-win momentum
2
5. Even though Google is an advertiser, its strategy is likely to weaken Apple’s and Amazon’s positions. • Amazon’s countermove would be to infiltrate its new offer in the Android platform • Apple can count on its brand image and does not primarily aim at reaching high volume • Google should heavily penetrate the tablet market in investing in adapting advertising services to tablets
(Tablet advertising’s CAGR is expected to be over 20%)
Apple’s strategy generates more profits than Amazon’s
Revenues 2010 Apple:
$5 423 M
iPad: $5 346 M
E-‐books: $77 Mn
Revenues 2010 Amazon: $2 098 M
Kindle: $1 512 M
E-‐books: $586 Mn
Profits 2010 Apple: $2 954 M
iPad: $2 931 M
E-‐books: $23 M
Losses 2010 Amazon: $ -‐26 M
Kindle: $28 M
E-‐books: $ -‐54M
• Amazon tries to create a demand and stifle competitors by selling at a loss • Apple has the biggest market share in the device market and undermine Amazon’s efforts to create a consequent market for e-books
Ø Amazon should gain market share in the device market before all
Market share devices 2010
Market share Ebooks 2010
iPad 41%
Kindle 39% Other 20%
Amazon 61%
iPad 8% Other 31%
3
(Source: press research)
But, Amazon’s business model is more appealing to publishers and readers
Amazon Apple
Average selling price of an ebook $9,45 $10,91
Average purchasing cost of an ebook $10,32 $7,64
features Amazon Apple B&N.com
Printed book retailer
Content accessibility
InteracPon
Ubiquitousness
Comfort
Storage
• iPad’s success is mainly explained by the range of functionalities it offers and is not based on the reading experience
• Publishers and readers should favor Amazon’s pricing model Ø Amazon should emphasize: 1. its edge over printed book retailers (lower cost of books, storage of books and instant access) 2. that the iPad is not a good-enough reading tool
We assume that $26 is the average price of a hardcover and that as many hardcovers are sold as backpapers
Weak Average Strong
4
(Source: BCG study)
Yet, forecasts do not show improvements in Amazon’s results
We show the scenario preserving more the Amazon’s bottom line. If Amazon adds functionalities, it can lose up to $2 bn.
Ø Amazon has to change its trajectory to capture the publisher’s margin
Apple: 32%
Amazon: 45%
Other e-readers:
23%
iPad: 57%
Kindle: 29%
Other devices: 15%
Profits Apple 2015: $10 586M
iPad: $10 457M E-‐Books: $129 M
Revenues Apple 2015: $19 603M
iPad: $19 171M E-‐books: $432 M
Profits Amazon 2015: $-‐2 M
Kindle: $54 M E-‐books: $-‐56 M
Revenues Amazon 2015: $3 509M
Kindle: $2 903M E-‐books: $606 M
MARKET SHARE DEVICES 2015
MARKET SHARE E-BOOKS 2015
55% 30% 2% -9%
Assuming that the only color device will stay the iPad, iPad will reach in 2015, a market penetration of 12% (i.e. 17.3 M people). We assume that Amazon will not gain market share on other e-readers. According to W. Street, financial analyst, the market share of Apple in e-books will be multiplied by 4.
5
(Source: press research, BCG study and self estimation)
Amazon should conquer consumers by being more adapted to the digital environment
Paper and printer: 35%
Shipping: 7%
Returned books: 13%
Marketing: 13%
G&A expenses: 9%
Depreciation: 3%
Editing: 5%
Royalties: 15%
Fixed costs: 30%
Variable costs: 70%
Marketing: 29%
G&A expenses:
20% Depreciation: 7%
Editing : 11%
Royalties: 33%
Fixed costs: 67%
Variable costs: 33%
Cost of a book for Amazon: between $9.3 and $12.38 Cost of an e-‐book for Amazon: $10.32
Average cost of an e-‐book for a publisher: $4.11
Average cost of a book for a publisher: $9.80
We assume that publishers have an average profitability of 5% on books:
Possibility to fix it to a certain extent
Ø Amazon must carry on focusing on volume but should fit to the dematerialized economy in changing its business model
• Assuming hidden costs of one euro per e-book, 1 e-book sold brings as much money to the publisher as at least 2 books sold
BOOKS E-BOOKS
6
(Source: Market Background)
Amazon’s new strategy: overcoming the barrier to adoption and locking-in the customer
Current situation
SAME STRATEGY
PROPOSED STRATEGY
Aggressive strategy on
device sales
Customer Lock-in through monthly
subscription
Negotiation of global licenses
with publishers
High profitability
and secured revenues
First mover advantage
on weakened competition
Exhausting competition on device
sales
Threat on e-Books sales
Challenge on
wholesale model
Higher exposure to competition
• Sales of the device at $99 Objective: reaching a market penetration of 25% in 2015
• $19.99 monthly subscription, unlimited access • Objective: democratize the market to occasional readers • Advantage: large volume increase
• Win-win situation with the publisher thanks to big volume increase à from 8 to 35 million customers • Objective: reduce the cost per book
• Advantage: Secured costs and high steady revenues Average $24 per customer/month
• Competition will be forced to follow or engage in a technology competition • Winner takes all situation
• Lack of profitability on the Kindle • iPad leads in terms of technology
• e-Books market share will decline with the tightening of competition • high costs
• legally jeopardized • low profitability, competition on volumes
• current market position difficult to maintain • competition will reduce profitability
• Cannot compete on the technological field • Classic/unattractive offer
Goals: • ebook market share: 80% • creating a higher ebook demand
Positive Danger Negative
Loss of profitability, erosion of
market shares
7
A strategy enabling Amazon to be profitable
Average yearly profitability of Amazon
over 5 years: $143 M
(vs $ -‐2M the previous model)
Revenues per year: $4 669 M
(vs $2 098M)
contribuPon of one consumer:
$288/Consumer/year (vs $166.5)
Average number of devices sold per year:
9 750 000
Costs per year: $4 526 M
(vs $3 511M)
average costs for e-‐books per year:
$835 M (vs $640 M)
Average costs of devices per year:
$3 691 M (vs $1 484M)
ASSUMPTIONS: 1. the objective of 25% penetration rate of the market within 5 years will be reached. Calculation based on a regular growth of customers portfolio.
2. Learning Curve: As it is a quite new market, device costs decrease with a constant rate of 30% each time cumulated production doubles
3. Amazon negotiates a yearly increase of 10% of contribution with publishers through a global license to overcome the cannibalization risk. • Advantage: increased of volumes, secured cash flows, possibility to have discounts on advertising on the Amazon Platform
At last Amazon will be profitable and revenues will be growing fast (34%/year)
8
Besides Apple, direct competitor’s response would be to follow the new order reinventing their business model
• Stay focused on devices as – Apple’s core business is not the ebook market but the devices – Their target is different: Apple’s customers like technology whereas Amazon’s like reading.
• Should Amazon thrive in launching this new business model, it would have exclusivity to the iPad platform in ebook selling but would have to pay a large fee to Apple
APPLE ‘S RESPONSE WILL BE “NOT MOVE”
BARNES & NOBLE
• Would change their business model, “pay-per-page” billing so as to sell to the customer only what it is accessing and thus emphasizing the difference with Amazon.
• Would leverage their assets in technology and high-tech and would preferably compete with the iPad .
SONY
All competitors will negotiate low prices with publishers as the market order would have shifted towards a lower price per ebook.
In any case they would hardly compete with Amazon because its position would be well secured against followers
9
Google sells adverPsing services but sPll will undermine devices, OperaPng Systems and media content providers
User aLracMon (Android and apps)
Access to content (e-‐books, & all other digital
media)
TargeMng AdverMsement selling
Target client on its access data
KPI
Google’s move will probably compel Amazon to provide its offer on the Android platform to reach its objective. Apple will resist because they have a strong brand equity and first mover advantage.
Objective
Service to users Service to ad buyers
VALUE CHAIN
Maximize number of Google users
Retain users in Google ecosystem
Monetize client database
- Number of devices - Number of users by device
- Time spent in the Google ecosystem - Traffic
- Accuracy of data - Market mapping ability
- Billing / traffic
Google wants to maximize its user
database
Google increases its presence on all
devices
Android based devices competes with the iPad
Google undermines the iPad value
Google wants to maximise Pme spent in its ecosystem
Google gives access to the maximum amount of content
Google undermines content providers’
value
OPERATING SYSTEM
PROVIDERS CONTENT
PROVIDERS
10
COMPETITION ANALYSIS
Google should invest in adapPng ads services in the tablets
Google should invest in technologies that allow Android to adapt to a maximum of device manufacturers and invest in tablet advertising
11
How can Google leverage this environment to increase sales?
Spread the use of Google operaPng
system
Adapt Android to other
manufacturers’ tablets
Indicator: Market share of tablets running Android
Launch Google’s tablet device
Adapt adverPsing to the tablets and apps use
Increase the market share of AdMob in
Tablet Ads (ObjecPve: 75% ads on Android; Cumulated revenue: $971 years)
Ensure a high level of suitability with the OperaPng
System
Quality of TargePng
Increase access to digital content
(Google books..)
Enable online adverPsing for tablet web browser
Specific ads for light
versions of websites
Rely on the tradiPonal search and display ad
ASSUMPTIONS: • Within 3 years, as many Android-based smartphones as iPads will be sold
(source: press research) • Within 5 years, 60% of tablets will run Android • The objective of 75% of Admob Ads in overall Android tablet Ads will be reached. • Ad mob will generate within 5 years 45% of the tablet advertising revenues (75% x 60%)
EASE OF IMPLEMENTATION
12 3 4
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
6
GR
OW
TH R
ATE
WIT
HIN
5 Y
EA
RS
50%
100%
0%