Activity 10 Team Cadmium

MAIN LOGOCREATIVE INDUSTRIES: BUSINESS PERSPECTIVES

TEAM CADMIUM

ACTIVITY 10: MEETING

2 / 18

CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: BUSINESS PERSPECTIVESACTIVITY 10: TEAM MEETING

TABLE OF CONTENTS1. FIRST MEETING

1.1 MEETING AGENDA: FIRST MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31.2 MEETING MINUTES: FIRST MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

2. SECOND MEETING2.1 MEETING AGENDA: SECOND MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92.2 MEETING MINUTES: SECOND MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . .10

3. THIRD MEETING3.1 MEETING AGENDA: THIRD MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .143.2 MEETING MINUTES: THIRD MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15

4. TIME-LINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17

5. BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18AVATAR

3 / 18


TEAM CADMIUM24 AUGUST 2015

AVATAR

MEETING AGENDA: FIRST MEETING■ DOCUMENT CREATED BY CARLOS VILLARREAL KWASEK REVISED BY TEAM CADMIUM

MEETING AGENDA FIRST MEETING

Meeting scheduled for the 4th of August 2015 at 14.00 GMT via audio Skype by Carlos Villarreal K.

Meeting duration: 1 hour and 20 minutes.Please be 5 minutes earlier in order to set up con-nection.

Attendees:

Nada Nassier (Art Direction). 7.00 (-7 GMT)Hiba Abu Heija (Creative Director). 18.00 (+4 GMT)Ian Richmond (Art Direction). 23.00 (+9 GMT)Carlos Villarreal K. (Team Leader). 16.00 (+2 GMT)

Purpose:

1. Agree on final team organization, rules, time-line and titles.

2. Choose a Gallery Theme.3. Agree on the next step and further meetings.

Meeting Lead: Carlos Villarreal Kwasek.

Meeting Minutes: Ian Richmond. (Everyone is en-couraged to take notes)

Agenda:

1. 13.55 (5 min) Connection setup. Skype.

2. 14.00 (5 min) Titles and Organizational Graph.

3. 14.05 (25 min) Management and Communica-tion Plan.

3.1 Reporting to the team: How often should we communicate?

3.2 Communication channel: IDI & Asana. Which one is for what?

3.3 Feedback: How do we create a draft? How do we feedback? When is it final?

3.4 Final Art: How do we keep all material consistent with the same art style?

3.5 Do we need another Skype meeting?

1. 14.30 (25 min) Team Rules and Operating Agreements.

1.1 How do we define goals? How far do we stretch each task? How can we reach Good quality, Better quality, and Best quality?

1.2 Postmortem: Should we feedback on our working practices after each task? What has been good? What have we struggled with? Does anything has to change?

1.3 Assignment postmortem: After our final delivery should we do an overall reflec-tion? Is this going to help each one of us for our self assessment?

1.4 Any resources we need to acquire?

2. 14.55 (20 min) Gallery theme: Review our pro-posals. Each person should explain their idea in 2 minutes maximum. After that we vote.

3. 15.15 (5 min) OPTIONAL: Q&A. Asana Tutorial?

4. 15.20 Meeting ends. ■

4 / 18



AVATAR

MEETING MINUTES: FIRST MEETING■ DOCUMENT CREATED BY IAN RICHMOND REVISED BY CARLOS VILLARREAL KWASEK

MEETING MINUTES FIRST MEETING

Meeting called to order Tuesday, August 04, 2015 at 14.00 GMT by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek (Team Leader) via audio Skype. Minutes recorded by Ian Richmond (Art Direction). Audio recording by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek (Villarreal Kwasek, 2015a).

FIRST MEETING: Document verifications on Time-line, Organogram, Management and Communica-tion Plan, Rules and Agreement, Discussion on a Gallery and Plan.

MEMBERS PRESENT:Nada Nassier (Art Direction). 7.00 ( 7 GMT) Hiba Abu Heija (Creative Director). 18.00 (+4 GMT) Ian Richmond (Art Direction). 23.00 (+9 GMT) Carlos VIllarreal K (Team Leader). 16.00 ( +2 GMT)

APPROVAL OF MINUTES:Motion: To approve Minutes from August 04 Skype meeting.

BUSINESS:

1.0Motion: To approve working titles and create an organizational graph (organogram).Result: Motion approved.NEXT STEPS: NN will complete the organizational graph by Friday, Aug 7, 2015.

2.0Motion: To review the ‘Management and Communication Plan’ produced by CVK. CVK

proposed that most tasks are going to be assigned for two or more people. Before each timeline deadline CVK proposed a work in progress update (nothing too complicated) and established our communication frequency.Result: Motion approved.

2.1Motion: Draft, WIP and Final Art intentions. CVK proposed to keep our WIP simple and not too polished before getting feedback. After feedback we can polish the Final Art. Then this would not need to be revised until time for the final delivery.Result: Motion approved.

2.2Motion: CVK proposed for each sprint team to provide Post Mortem feedback for each task to the IDI forum (short and condensed is fine) and encouraged forum communication to address any problems and provide solutions if need be.Result: Motion approved.

2.3Motion: Art Direction - CVK proposed to create a template created by NN and IR. HAH is in favour and proposed for the team to select a font and colour scheme that can be filled in easily across all documents. HAH proposed that NN and IR take responsibility, and HAH and CVK can focus on written work and or research.Result: Motion approved. ▶

5 / 18



AVATAR


NEXT STEPS: NN and IR need to provide a template for future documents to streamline productivity.

2.4Motion: Deliverables - CVK proposed to hand in our chosen reports to our tutor Joe Lynch this Friday, August, 07 or Monday, August, 10. Result: Motion approved.NEXT STEPS: Make available all of the documents in the IDI Forum for the purpose of individually uploading to Joe Lynch (tutor) from our personal studios.

2.5Motion: CVK proposed the idea of having another meeting in a week or two. NN and HAH agree and feel that we should have meetings as often as we can.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: CVK will plan another agenda and another meeting in the next week or two that will be shorter and more condensed.

2.6Motion: CVK proposed a follow-up after we deliver everything during final submission.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: After final submission submit a follow-up comment in the forum that could be also used in our Self-Assessment 2 and Critical Journal.

3.0Motion: HAH proposes to refine what each person will deliver / display and how we will create the manifesto, and also to decide on what kind of gallery to produce. Dialogue: NN proposed that we use our unique backgrounds to create a united identity ‘Global

Gallery’. IR supports the idea of a ‘Future Gallery’ with a focus on the community. HAH proposed a ‘Future Gallery’ that incorporates our own experiences and captures the essence of all of us and our skill sets while including elements of a ‘Global Gallery’ and ‘Historical / Nostalgic Gallery’. CVK proposed a virtual gallery, as the gallery grows, the community grows. NN proposed that she could contribute to the completion of a virtual gallery using her background in animation and design for the final presentation. CVK offered to help NN with 3D models by doing some animation in the form of a short video. CVK proposed that the manifesto consist of three simple topics on integration, global and virtual. Result: undecided

3.1Motion: HAH asked what each member of the team will bring to the gallery (not to the project as a whole)?. Dialogue: CVK proposed that each member of the group specialise in a particular discipline and asks that we individually propose how we will contribute to the gallery. HAH proposes an idea of having a virtual gallery but also a mobile, physical gallery to meet the criteria of ‘Global’. CVK clarifies by reaffirming HAH’s idea is a form of packaged gallery. HAH adds that a virtual gallery can be displayed anywhere and that it should be able to be displayed anywhere physically. IR supports HAH’s idea and wants all members to utilize their specific speciality, and notes the idea of only a virtual gallery is restrictive for interior or architectural possibilities (lighting, etc.). CVK questions how this gallery will fit in different spaces in various countries? HBH responds that future art will support printing to make anything fit into a potential

6 / 18



AVATAR


space. CVK responds with the notion of there being no need for a virtual gallery and that it could be built locally and offers the idea of a catalogue where the viewer can choose what they want from a virtual space and experience it in reality. Furthermore, CVK supports the idea that we need to choose one gallery, a form of virtual or physical to prevent a conflict of concepts. NN supports CVK in having one idea because of time restrictions. CVK addresses that we all agree on a ‘Future Gallery Concept’ and is willing to drop the idea of a virtual gallery and focus on a physical space in one’s city.Result: All are in agreement with a ‘Future Gallery’.NEXT STEPS: How will each one of us contribute the creation and content of the gallery? To the manifesto?

3.2Motion: HAH asks what is each one of us going to display in the gallery? Dialogue: There is a continued discussion between HAH and CVK about the space and what will be displayed and where. HAH feels that there should not be a restriction, and CVK feels there needs to be a set or defined area. IR proposes the idea of a gallery that can be configured very quickly (ex. an hour) and is portable (in our hand or pocket like a smart phone but able to fill a physical area). CVK adds that we need to focus on how to show this space, before and after. HAH adds that the focus should be on what we are going to display using our combined disciplines to contribute to our theme. CVK brings up the notion that we are not directing filling the gallery with our work, but we are just facilitators for the artists to show their work. HAH presented an idea that each one of us can offer a nostalgic element of our discipline but portrayed in a futuristic sense that can be put anywhere in

the world. IR mentioned that the focus does not necessarily need to be what is displayed but what the overall aesthetic and design direction of the gallery can display. CVK clarifies by asking whether the idea of a theme can be the inspiration for the idea of the ‘Future Gallery’, such as how people will see the future in their culture. IR adds that his original idea for the gallery was to include a concept of how the blind may experience a gallery and adds that people of different backgrounds, and cultures are blind to stereotypes and issues. NN agrees that she likes this idea and reinforces the idea that we are all from different backgrounds and even though distance may not be far there are many differences. CVK adds that outsiders often see a culture as the same which is not accurate, we could somehow show what is unique in here (in our location) for us but not unique to our neighbors?Result: Undecided.

3.3Motion: HAH asks what are we going to create, a gallery space or a gallery with displays? Dialogue: CVK we need a basic display. CVK adds that we have to show how it will be built and what will be inside, this is more practical. NN and IR agree. HAH mentions a more conceptual idea and references a friend’s gallery in Jordan about the ordinary people around within one’s location, each with different backgrounds living together. Attaching A1 / A2 posters of these people to a bridge proved the evidence of a rich culture in the area. This idea reinforces that art/prints could be set up anywhere. IR mentions an idea how this concept of using the street and surroundings to display art could incorporate regular elements of advertising and signage to instruct and inform the viewers of the gallery. A barber shop could provide

7 / 18



AVATAR


information about the gallery and instead of a map use the vernacular signage to instruct the viewer where to go. A stop sign that isn’t a stop sign (stop signs look different in Japan anyhow). HAH adds to the idea, ‘urban furniture as signage?’ IR responds using what is already there but cater to the gallery. CV likes the idea of changing the meaning or purpose of an object that is possibly something different. Result: Using signs and vernacular locations as inspiration to a ‘Future Gallery’.

3.4Motion: IR asks what do we all see in our personal vision of a ‘Future Gallery’? Could it be anywhere? Dialogue: NN and HAH feel that it could be anywhere and with the digital age content can be printed and put anyplace. HAH reinforces the idea that there is no one way to display things and interpretation is different for everyone, she feels that we should incorporate signage into the ‘Futuristic Theme’. CV likes the idea of changing the meaning of something creating a revelation, revealing a potential theme for the gallery. Presented somehow and interpreted in many ways, often involving a second input into the actual intention or meaning. HAH reinforces that this idea is global, IR adds that this concept could reinforce learning (in general). Result: All members are in agreement of implementing a strategy of signage and challenging the notion of interpretation / meaning.

3.5Motion: CVK asks if the gallery be printed anywhere? Having Japanese objects in Dubai looks interesting and then there is the learning/interpretation of the different meaning of the signs.

Dialogue: HAH adds that this means that the signs could be placed anywhere, and they are legitimate signs, but not necessarily local to the area. NN adds that a woman’s toilet sign in Jeddah might not be recognizable by other people of different cultures. Result: We all agree that the concept of using real city space and signs to open people’s eyes to different cultures. It is open to interpretation, futuristic and can be placed anywhere in the world. CVK adds that we can start with signage and then move into a focus on overall culture.NEXT STEPS: How we will decide this is still not determined though we have created a concept of some kind. HAH offered the idea that we need to all contribute to making the world a global village.

3.6Motion: CVK raises the question, what is the difference between this and ‘street art’? HAH adds that this is more digital and refined. CVK Do we need to specify that we are not ‘street art’?Result: Everyone agrees that we need to clarify that this is not street art.

3.7Motion: CVK summarises, that we are going to create a ‘Future Gallery’. This will be initially created digitally and then represented in a city (in some capacity).Result: Motion approved.OVERVIEW & NEXT STEPS: CVK will re-evaluate the timeline and assess tasks to the team members.

4.0 Motion: HAH raised an idea to simplify the documents to streamline our working process by being less formal and more concise.Result: Motion approved.

8 / 18



AVATAR


NEXT STEPS: Further simplify future documents until we decide on what we will submit. (Keep the idea of WIP extended longer)

4.1Motion: HAH asks what documents should we hand in? There is a minimum requirement of two.Result: Motion approved.

NEXT STEPS: Hand in the timeline and the organogram along with the Management and Communication Plan Friday, August, 07 or Monday, August, 10.

Meeting adjourned by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek, (Team Leader), at 15.27 GMT. ■

9 / 18



AVATAR

MEETING AGENDA: SECOND MEETING■ DOCUMENT CREATED BY CARLOS VILLARREAL KWASEK REVISED BY TEAM CADMIUM

MEETING AGENDA SECOND MEETING


Duration of meeting: 50 minutes to 1 hour.Please be 5 minutes earlier in order to set up con-nection.

Attendees:

Nada Nassier (Art Direction). 7.00 (-7 GMT)Hiba Abu Heija (Creative Director). 18.00 (+4 GMT)Ian Richmond (Art Direction). 23.00 (+9 GMT)Carlos VIllarreal K. (Team Leader). 16.00 (+2 GMT)

Purpose:

1. Review brainstorming.2. Decide further actions.

Meeting Lead: Carlos.

Meeting Minutes: Nada Nassier. (Everyone is en-couraged to take notes)

Agenda:

1. 13.55 (5 min) Connection setup. Skype.

2. 14.00 (40-50 min) Brainstorm Proposals.

2.1 (10 min) Each member has to explain in a summary their proposal in no more than 100 words (+- 10%). Each member has to have read everyone’s proposal beforehand.

2.2 (10 min) Each member has to prepare be-forehand two comments for each proposal no longer than 40 words (+- 10%). As a rule of thumb: if you disagree you have to offer an viable solution.

2.3 (20-30 min) Discussion.

3. 14.50 (10 min) Proposals conclusion.

3.1 Nada and Carlos will work on Activity 10 document.

3.2 Two people will work on a final proposal.3.3 Two people will work on a manifesto.3.4 Further research about our final presenta-

tion format. ■

10 / 18



AVATAR

MEETING MINUTES: SECOND MEETING■ MINUTES BY NADA NASSIER REVISED BY CARLOS VILLARREAL KWASEK

MEETING MINUTES SECOND MEETING

Meeting called to order Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 14.00 GMT by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek (Team Leader) via audio Skype. Minutes recorded by Nada Nassier (Art Direction). Audio recording by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek (Villarreal Kwasek, 2015b).

SECOND MEETING: Review the agenda-focus on Mock Gallery Proposals-Discuss proposals briefly – Comments and critique-divide tasks.

MEMBERS PRESENT:Nada Nassier (Art Direction) unable to attend. 7.00 ( -7 GMT) Hiba Abu Heija (Creative Director). 18.00 (+4 GMT) Ian Richmond (Art Direction). 23.00 (+9 GMT) Carlos Villarreal Kwasek (Team Leader). 16.00 ( +2 GMT)


BUSINESS:

1.0Motion: To approve and discuss Mock Gallery proposals and comment on each idea. Result: Motion approved.

2.0Motion: HAH start the discussion by explaining the proposal (Urban Furniture Gallery) can be a reconfigurable installation, any kind of urban

furniture that can be utilized for art display/work station. HAH aim to a communal activity to connect art with culture making a futuristic gallery and to implement everywhere making it global. Result: Motion approved.

2.1Motion: Comments and critique. CVK comments the proposal to be positive by considering the audience as participants, and give potential for government to use in city space. IR comments the proposal to be a good idea looking in urban design and how to improve public area, encourage the community to communicate through art. IR gives an example by wondering how to attract more young people in the city of Nagasaki for future life.Result: Motion approved.

2.2Motion: HAH mentioned that each member with different discipline can bring something basic to add in Gallery proposed for each member a start task. HAH suggest working on design along ideas, IR work on rendering the presentation of work, NN work on animation presentation and virtual images, CVK work on ideas and comments.Result: Motion approved.

2.3Motion: IR proposed to create urban jungle, mixing natural world, paintings, installations and green positive energy to the city. IR adds that art improves culture and attract youths (future gallery).

11 / 18



AVATAR


IR imagine the concept to be similar to National Geographic Magazine with simple, clear and solid ideaResult: Motion approved.

2.4Motion: Comments and critique. CVK comments are positives and agreed that green positive energy improves the quality of life; perhaps including some images would be better. HAH comments briefly that the urban jungle idea with out images made us imagine the idea more, as where HAH lives is mostly desert. HAH adds that this idea is easy and quick to implement and gives an idea of concrete images from different cities, Photoshop the images showing the differences before and after, green is always positive, liveliness and superstitious.Result: Motion approved.

2.5Motion: CVK proposed the idea of having Urban Gallery that focused on what is displayed. Community can be engaged in what to see, talking about something important to the people living or visiting that community. CVK support the gallery by a digital map to know the free gallery spot, making it global by being accessible to more people. Result: Motion Approved.

2.6Motion: Comments and critique. IR comments on CVK proposal to be similar and incorporate similar ideas where getting community together with art both urban gallery and urban jungle are related in having a positive place/city. HAH comments about CVK proposal to be easy and quick with ready map and Photoshop images. HAH adds that raising awareness in community through art is best done

through Street Art and HAH provides an example of a street art group raising issues through Arabic quotes linking community and addressing things in an easy way.Result: Motion Approved.

3.0Motion: CVK proposes to give feedback on NN proposal. CVK thinks that NN proposal takes a different perspective; it focused on marketing scheme more than just being friendly and beauty the city it is interesting to see. HAH thinks that it captured the essence of Art Gallery, a lot of competition, and it could be more of a private sector not work as a community project. IR comments that NN proposal is interesting to look at, but it doesn’t fit to be a gallery theme. It needs a lot of research, IR is not sure what does NN meant by low prices (cheap products or cheap prices), it is too big and raised a lot of questions. Result: Motion Approved.

3.1Motion: HAH asked to make decisions based on time, the ease of implement and divide the load of task in order of team working. CVK suggested voting on one proposal through Asana. HAH is in favor of voting in Asana as well and voting on the pros and cons. What each member of the team will vote for the gallery? .Dialogue: CVK proposed that each member of the group vote for one proposal in Asana in a particular CVK vote for HAH proposal and offers to design a mock up in 3D with actual content on the wall. HAH proposes an idea of designing 3D modeling and suggest that IR and NN render and add effects through Photoshop. CVK clarifies doing activity 10 with NN. IR supports HAH’s idea and start

12 / 18



AVATAR


to brainstorm ideas about manipulating the 3D images and filling in the empty spaces of the gallery canvas. HAH questioned which meeting minutes will be submitted? The first or second meeting?. CVK thinks that the second meeting should be submitted to JL as it clears our gallery ideas and show more working progress. CVK categorized the task and divide them up into sections where each two member of the team will work on one task. Result: All are in agreement with CVK task management.NEXT STEPS: CVK and NN will work on Activity 10. Two members will work on final proposal, two will write the manifesto; CVK will contact JL checking about the timeline.

3.2Motion: HAH asks what if we combined all the meeting minutes reports and handle them in one document as we have them ready already? Dialogue: IR supported HAH suggestion pointing at keeping JL in track of our gallery progress. There is a continued discussion between HAH and CVK about the deliverables of activity 10-11, and what will be included. HAH feels that there should be one document complex the meeting agenda, timeline and all the meetings minutes. And CVK feels that it is OK and agreed with HAH. IR proposes to vote for urban furniture and design, IR questioned not sure what to include in the concept? Is it going to be design from scratch? HAH explained that by capturing four different aerial views of four different countries, choosing a location and inspired from the existing land live. CVK raise a question about what is the theme content? HAH answered basically it is about Gallery space (whether it is a wall, street, fence or a simple urban fixture. For the people in the area), the content is not important. CVK is

worried about IDI questing us about the content. HAH adds that we can make the content to be very simple like school artwork or community artwork focusing on how to show the gallery space, before and after. IR is curious about urban furniture?. HAH replies in having two options the first one is to choose four locations and extend that. The second option is going global like having the gallery in a bus stop, bench displays, wall displays; it can be fixture and fit anywhere. Result: Motion Approved.

3.3Motion: IR asks are they going to be our original ideas? Dialogue: HAH adds that sort of very basic ideas, it can be modular design playing around with materials, colors and basic manipulation. CVK suggested a 3D module in Photoshop integration. HAH adds that the team needs to decide on one idea and search for case studies examples, then sketch it up and input the design to Photoshop for rendering. CVK list the final decision of the meeting into four sections. First section is deciding on Urban Furniture in the city. Second section all of the team members must research for ideas and case studies for 2 days, vote on 2 styles. The third section is assigning NN and CVK to finish Activity 10. The fourth section is highlighting and updating meeting in the time line files by IR. The discussion counties between CVK and HAH about how many people should work on each task such as the vision of the manifesto and preparing for the final proposal. Result: Discussion completed and decision is in process.

3.4Motion: CVK thinks that HAH should do the final

13 / 18



AVATAR


proposal if the whole team vote for her idea, which is urban furniture.Dialogue: HAH feel that it could be too much workload if her idea was chosen to be the mock gallery. HAH is concerned about time consuming and managing between team work and individual work. CVK suggested one-week duration to submit activity 10 and work on activity 11 at the same time. IR and HAH agreed on that and confirm it. Result: All members are in agreement of implementing a strategy to complete the stages of research and working process for the urban furniture gallery.

3.5Motion: CVK and IR mentioned about New York Urbanized art document and suggest HAH and NN to have a look at this document. CVK asks HAH if she have watched urbanized documentary, and feels that HAH will like it very much. Dialogue: HAH mentions that she has not get the chance and watch Urbanized documentary, and she is excited to have a look as CVK and IR suggested. Result: CVK will share the link to Urbanized documentary in Asana for HAH and NN to view.NEXT STEPS: Research into urban furniture and case study. HAH offered the idea that we need to vote within 2 days so she will be able to start the 3D modeling.

3.6Motion: CVK raises the question, about the 3D files not to be still images so he can change the camera angle to fix or add some changes. HAH will sort this and send him the desired file. Result: Everyone agrees that addressing this issue can be done in Asana.

3.7Motion: CVK summarizes, that we are going to create an Urban Future Gallery. This will be initially created digitally and in 3D mockups / sketches then represented in a city.Result: Motion approved.OVERVIEW & NEXT STEPS: CVK will re-evaluate and assess tasks to the team members.

4.0 Motion: HAH raised an idea to simplify the working stages to streamline our working process by allocated days to finish tasks. 2 days for voting and case studies research, 2-3 days schematic model on AutoCAD, 3 days for 2 people to gather data for manifesto research (our vision reinforces other professional). CVK suggested 1 person for the final proposal HAH offers that after editing and revised, the entire document can be in one file with table of content and index.

Result: Motion approved.NEXT STEPS: Further task details will be shared in Asana by CVK.

4.1Motion: CVK vote and listing the tasks in one week we can decide if we need to meet. Feedback will continue in Asana.Result: Motion approved.NEXT STEPS: HAH assign to do the final proposal 3D Module. NN meeting Minutes Activity 10. CVK writing the meeting and finish Activity 10 as well assign in Asana the task in full details and arrange for a third meeting if necessary. IR put everything together the entire documents.

Meeting adjourned by Carlos VIllarreal Kwasek, (Team Leader), at 15.27 GMT. ■

14 / 18



AVATAR

MEETING AGENDA: THIRD MEETING■ MINUTES BY CARLOS VILLARREAL KWASEK

MEETING AGENDA THIRD MEETING


Duration of meeting: 50 minutes to 1 hour.Please be 5 minutes earlier in order to set up con-nection.

Attendees:

13.00 (+2 GMT) Carlos Villarreal K. (Team Leader)14.00 (+3 GMT) Nada Nassier (Art Direction)15.00 (+4 GMT) Hiba Abu Heija (Creative Director)20.00 (+9 GMT) Ian Richmond (Art Direction)

Purpose: Revise tasks for final sprint and delivery.

Meeting Lead: Carlos.

Meeting Minutes: Carlos. (Everyone is encouraged to take notes)

Agenda:

1. 11.00 (10 min) Proposal Discussion.

1.1 (10 min) The Concept. What is Art Parklet.

2. 11. 10 (50 min) Tasks. Who does what.

2.1 (10 min) Manifesto Notion and Vision.2.2 (10 min) Why this project matters?2.3 (5 min) Thinking Global.2.4 (5 min) Communal Space.2.5 (5 min) Art Incorporation.2.6 (5 min) Green Infusion.2.7 (10 min) Design.

3. 12.00 Meeting Ends. ■

15 / 18



AVATAR

MEETING MINUTES: THIRD MEETING■ MINUTES BY CARLOS VILLARREAL KWASEK

MEETING MINUTES THIRD MEETING

Meeting called to order Tuesday, August 25, 2015 at 11.00 GMT by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek (Team Leader) via audio Skype. Minutes recorded by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek. Audio recording by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek (Villarreal Kwasek, 2015c).

SECOND MEETING:

1. Revise final delivery document and supporting material.

2. Assign specific tasks.

MEMBERS PRESENT:

13.00 (+2 GMT) Carlos Villarreal K. (Team Leader)14.00 (+3 GMT) Nada Nassier (Art Direction)15.00 (+4 GMT) Hiba Abu Heija (Creative Director)20.00 (+9 GMT) Ian Richmond (Art Direction)


BUSINESS:

1.0Motion: CVK proposes for HAH to explain again shortly what is Art Parklet for everyone.Result: Motion approved.

2.0Motion: CVK proposed to update the structure of the proposal document created by HAH for better

presentation impact.Result: Motion approved.

2.1Motion: Based on HAH document CVK proposed to divide the document in four main parts: 1. Manifesto, 2. Concepts, 3. Art Parklet and 4. Conclusion.1. Manifesto is an introduction to the project and the Manifesto itself. This section will explain in a broad scale the themes we will focus on: Global, Community and Street Art, and also present the actual Manifesto. 2. Concepts will present specific projects and ideas that exist today individually but are not linked together. This is the “problem”; 3. Art Parklet is a combination of all the ideas discussed before. This is our proposal; and 4. Conclusion is a summary and reinforcement of why this project matters.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: CVK has the final document and team will send all material to him.

3.0Motion: CVK proposed to divide tasks based on the structure of the document.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS & OVERVIEW: CVK will create tasks in Asana and assign people. Team agrees that “less is more” and document should be concise, clear and informative. ▶

16 / 18



AVATAR

MEETING MINUTES: THIRD MEETING■ MINUTES BY CARLOS VILLARREAL KWASEK

3.1Motion: HAH rectifies the structure for the document.‘Manifesto Notion and Vision’ is an introduction to the themes we will address, this is the problem we will tackle. The ‘Manifesto’ is the “poetic” solution. ‘Concepts’ is the practical solution using case studies. And ‘Future Gallery’ is our proposal.Result: Motion Approved.OVERVIEW: Team agrees.

3.2Motion: HAH proposes to create orthographic drawings to explain the design and later send them to Art Department for layout.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: HAH will send orthographic views to Art Directors. Conversation will continue in Asana.

3.3Motion: IR asks for clarification for ‘Mock Images’. CVK proposes to create two images using real photos and incorporate the 3D model as ‘beauty’ renders to present the concept in a real life situation. HAH would like to include different people in the renderings with clear local identities to represent ‘Global’.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS & OVERVIEW: IR will look for source images and CVK will work on a test image. Conversation will continue in Asana. HAH sent already an OBJ file to CVK that works in Maya.

3.4Motion: Due to travel and health matters NN hasn’t been feeling well. Doctor advised that she should avoid stress. NN asked about further tasks. CVK proposed to assign Moodboard page to NN. HAH

will contribute with images and CVK will provide base layout. CVK proposed for NN to gather image references to further explain the concepts presented through the document and edit them as required. CVK proposed for NN to be in charge of Bibliography as well. HAH proposes to create a new RefMe shared folder for this Bibliography.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: Team acknowledges NN situation. CVK and NN will continue conversation in Asana to asses work load for NN. NN will gather reference images, critically edit them and gather Bibliography in a new RefMe shared folder. Members of the team will share with NN relevant material that has been collected so far.

3.5Motion: IR proposes to be in charge of ‘Green Infusion’. HAH complemented IR idea proposal ‘Urban Jungle’. CVK mentioned that tasks have been created considering previous research by each member.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: IR will work with ‘Green Infusion’.

3.6Motion: CVK proposes that each task will have one team member responsible for it and a second team member revising it.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: CVK will assign owners and revisers in Asana.

3.7Motion: CVK proposes that as a stretch goal the team should deliver an animated sample in 3DResult: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: CVK and NN will consider the viability

of this goal based on time availability.

3.8Motion: CVK proposes to add Credits in the document in order to list the team members and also include ‘Production Babies’ to include new born Ian’s Richmond son Kendrix William Richmond.Result: Motion Approved.NEXT STEPS: CVK will create a ‘Credits’ section.

Meeting adjourned by Carlos Villarreal Kwasek, (Team Leader), at 11.36 GMT. ■

29 W

30 T

h

31 F 1 S

at

JUL AUG

2 S

un

3 M

4 T

5 W

7 F

8 S

at

9 S

un

10 M

13 T

h

14 F

11 T

12 W

DEADLINE

NEW PROJECT HEADING>

GOAL

THE GALLERY 6

Th

18 T

19 W

20 T

h

21 F

22 S

at

23 S

un

24 M

25 T

26 W

15 S

at

16 S

un

17 M

27 T

h

28 F

CARLOS

NADA

HIBA

IAN

TEAM CADMIUM

> GLOBAL GALLERY

> PROJECT TIME-LINE

> DESIGN TEMPLATE & LOGO

> RESEARCH INTO STREET ART

> DIGITAL GALLERY CATALOGUE RESEARCH

> HISTORIC GALLERY

> FUTURE GALLERY

> MANAGEMENT & COMMUNICATION PLAN

> FUTURE GALLERY PROPOSALS

> URBAN ART FURNITURE RESEARCH

> ACTIVITY 10 DELIVERY

> MEETING AGENDA

> SECOND MEETING AGENDA

> MEETING MINUTES

> MANIFESTO RESEARCH

> FINAL MANIFESTO

> REVIEW AND APPROVE THE FINAL DOCUMENT

> FINAL PRESENTATION (INTERACTIVE)

> ACTIVITY 10 DELIVERY *REFINEMENT

> FINAL PROPOSAL

> DRAWINGS, 3D SKETCH, DESIGN

> IMAGES MOCK> MEETING 9AM GMT

> SECOND MEETING 9AM GMT

> TEAM RULES OR OPERATING AGREEMENTS

TEAM CADMIUMGALLERY TIME-LINE

CADMIUM TIME-LINE& DOCUMENT AUTHOR: IAN RICHMOND

> ACTIVITY 11 SUBMISSION

> SECOND MEETING MINUTES

> TIME-LINE REVISE

18 / 18



AVATAR

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Villarreal Kwasek, Carlos (2015a) Cadmium First Team Meeting. [online] Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzTXPg2wY9gDTlpUVnlaUVI2N00/view?usp=sharing [Accessed 24 August 2015]

Villarreal Kwasek, Carlos (2015b) Cadmium Second Team Meeting. [online] Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzTXPg2wY9gDSTRScTJOUUVlTzg/view?usp=sharing [Accessed 24 August 2015]

Villarreal Kwasek, Carlos (2015c) Cadmium Third Team Meeting. [online] Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzTXPg2wY9gDdHBTWFcxRWNONFU/view?usp=sharing [Accessed 24 August 2015]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzTXPg2wY9gDTlpUVnlaUVI2N00/view?usp=sharing



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzTXPg2wY9gDSTRScTJOUUVlTzg/view?usp=sharing



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzTXPg2wY9gDdHBTWFcxRWNONFU/view?usp=sharing



Art & Photos

Activity 10 Team Cadmium