RV 2014: HSR for Midsize Cities: TOD Lessons from Near and Far by Eric Eidlin

  • View
    160

  • Download
    0

  • Category

    Travel

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

HSR for Midsize Cities: TOD Lessons from Near and Far High-speed rail is here. California and the Midwest are both planning HSR corridors to serve large and midsize cities within the next decade or two. Cities are working closely with agencies to carefully plan TOD to serve both statewide and local needs. Explore lessons, both pragmatic and visionary, from around the world. Start in Germany and France, then turn to more local experiences in Wisconsin and California. Hear from high-level state agency representatives, researchers and professionals experienced in HSR station area planning. Learn how they are working with federal, state and local agencies on TOD to address economic development; respond to climate change legislation; integrate public transit networks; and create dense activity centers within walking distance to future HSR stations. Moderator: Monica Villalobos, Senior Project Manager, AECOM, Los Angeles, California Eric Eidlin, Urban and Regional Policy Fellow, German Marshall Fund of the US/Federal Transit Administration, US Department of Transportation, San Francisco, California Katherine Perez-Estolano, Board Member, California High Speed Rail Authority, Los Angeles, California Barry Gore, Planner-Urban Designer, BGore Design/Campaign for Yahara Station, Madison, Wisconsin Vaughan Davies, Principal, Director of Urban Design, AECOM, Los Angeles, California

Citation preview

BEYOND THE PARK-AND-RIDE LOT

Lessons for California on High Speed Rail from France and Germany

Sou

rce:

San

na S

iissa

lo

Eric Eidlin, AICP | Federal Transit Administration 2013 – 2014 German Marshall Fund Urban and Regional Policy Fellow

Rail~volution 2014 | Minneapolis, MN | September 23, 2014

Overview

• Project objectives• Cities visited and rationale• Rationale for California High

Speed Rail (HSR)• HSR in France and Germany• Main themes raised in

interviews• Lessons for California

Project Objectives

Learn about:• Different approaches to station

siting• Best practices in promoting non-

auto access to HSR stations• Station design and the multiple

roles of stations• HSR-specific land uses• Parking

Interviewees

Interviewed 60 individuals in Europe:• National railways• Government officials:–Federal–Local (transit agencies, city

planning offices)• Researchers (think tanks,

universities)• Private consultants• Lay people

FRANCE

Lyon (home base)

Berlin (home base)

GERMANY

Le Creusot

Paris

Strasbourg

Aix-en-Provence

Avignon

Marseille

Important French

locations not

visited

Haute-Picardie

Lille

Münster

Kassel

Dresden

Hannover

Leipzig

Erfurt

Important

German locations

not visited

Freiburg

Limburg

Cologne

Montabaur

PARIS – MARSEILLE HSR CORRIDOR

31 million riders/year (2008)

(PO

PU

LATIO

N I

N M

ILLIO

NS

) 74 million riders/year, all lines (2009)

BERLIN – STUTTGART HSR CORRIDOR

Stuttgart, 1.5

Mannheim, 0.6

Frankfurt, 2.3Berlin, 3.4

million

39 million riders/year (2030)

PROPOSED CALIFORNIA HSR

0 100 200 300 400 500 600MILES

Paris Region12.0 million

CAHSR Station Area Planning

• Six cities to receive funds for land use planning in station areas

• Cities: Fresno, San Jose, Merced, San Jose, Gilroy, Bakersfield, Palmdale

• Plans range from $800k to $1.4 million, 50% federal (FRA stimulus funds)

FRANCE66 million inhab.260,558 sq. mi.302 people/ sq.

mi.

GERMANY82 million inhab.137,846 sq. mi.608 people / sq.

mi.

CALIFORNIA38 million inhab.163,696 sq mi.232 people / sq.

mi.

Network: 1265 mi.

114m riders/yrInitiation:

1981

Paris Gar de Lyon

• Country highly centralized politically and economically

• Paris by far largest urban area (12m); Lyon next (2m)

• Primary goal of HSR is to speed travel between Paris and second tier cities

• Mostly dedicated HSR trackFRANCE

• Network: 1265 mi.

• 114m riders/yr• Initiation: 1981

Paris Transit and HSR

• HSR quicker and more popular than air between many cities

Paris Gare de Lyon

Marseille St. Charles

Paris-Lyon:

virtually no more air travel

Network: 798mi. 235

under construction

75 million HSR riders/yrInitiation:

1991

GERMANY

Source: Koeln.de• Federal country with more even distribution of population• Berlin largest urban

area at 3.5m, next largest Hamburg at 1.7m• Many cities with 400k-

1m inhabitants, so trains stop frequently• Mostly blended HSR

system

Source: Koeln.de

Cologne Main Station

• HSR trains serve historic city center stations• Little HSR-specific

land use planningGERMANY

Source: Koeln.de• HSR not a fundamentally new thing, but rather the next evolution in an existing technology• First rate highway

system and well-developed network of airports compete with HSR• Heavy focus on

intermodality• DB operates own

carshare and bikeshare servicesGERMANY

Speed Versus Connectivity

PARIS – STRASBOUR

G474 KM / 295

MI2:20 / 0 STOPS

126 MPH AVG

OFFENBURG - BERLIN

750 KM / 466 MI

5:55 / 13 STOPS

78 MPH AVG

SÜDKREUZ

STATION

HOME

SÜDKREUZ

STATION30 minutes travel time savings in

southbound direction

BerlinTransit and HSR

Station Types

Central City - Erfurt

Central City - Erfurt

City population: 204,000Station renovation completed 200634,000 passengers/day10 tracks390 parking spaces (underground garage)Mid point along future Berlin – Munich HSR

Exurban - Le Creusot

“Gare Betterave”

Exurban - Aix-en-Provence TGV

Exurban - Aix-en-Provence TGV

Opened: 200110 miles from downtown Aix, pop. 143,0007,000 passengers/day2860 parking spaces4 tracks (2 pass-through)

Peripheral -- Avignon TGV

Peripheral - Avignon TGV

Opened: 20012.5 miles from downtownAvignon pop. 95,0007,300 passengers/day1,890 parking spaces4 tracks (2 pass-through)New rail transit link

Avignon “Virgule”

2.5

mile

s

New Center City – Lyon Part Dieu

New Center City - Lyon Part Dieu

Lyon Perrache

Lyon Part-Dieu

2 miles

• Opened for service in 1983

• Station built for 35,000 people/day

• Station now sees 120,000/day

• Busiest rail station in France for connections

New Center City - Lyon Part Dieu

New Center City - Lyon Part Dieu

0 500’

Walk35%

Bike3%

Transit40%

Taxi5%

Car17%

How intercity rail travelersget to Lyon Part-Dieu

Opened: 1983Lyon pop. 2 million (in region)Center of new downtown districtCentral node in local transit and national rail networks120,000 people/day2,060 parking spaces11 tracks

20,000 people use station as pedestrian tunnel daily

New Center City - Lyon Part Dieu

KEY NUMBERS- Second office district in France- 6.5 million sf new office space- 1.6 million sf new residential space- 2.2 million sf retail, event, and hotel spaceKEY CONCEPTS“Gare ouverte”“Gare connectrice”“Socles actifs”“Sol difficile” and “sol facile”

La Defense, Paris

Lyon Part Dieu

Station Design andLand Use

Downtown Station / Mall - Leipzig

Downtown Station / Mall - Hannover

Hannover Main Station

Station / Mall – Paris St. Lazare

Convention Center Station – Cologne Deutz

Source: Thomas Wolf

HSR Station vs. Airport

11,000 sf office5,500 jobs

245 hotel rooms

11 million sf office 45,000 jobs2,000 hotel rooms

10,000 parking spaces

5,000 parking spaces

26 million passengers (2011)

8 million passengers in 2011

Lyon St. Exupéry AirportLyon Part-Dieu HSR

Permeable Station – Berlin Stadtbahn

Intermodal Connections andPayment Systems

Blended Stations

Blended Stations

½-

mile

SAN JOSE DIRIDON

150 HSTs/day + 400 other

trains

LYON PART-DIEU LA UNION

64 HSTs/day (2029)#? other trains

Integrated Fares and Ticketing

VBB = “Transportation alliance” for Berlin / Brandenburg

Mobility Services

Integrated Fares and Ticketing

Mobility Services

Includes:• Annual public transit pass• Carshare membership• Car rental discounts• 20 % discount on taxis,

cashless payment• German Rail discount card• Integrated mobility bill for all

basic costs, carshare and taxi trips

Integrated Navigation and Ticketing

Ticketless Travel

The Bicycle:A Space-Efficient Access Mode

National Cycling Plan - Germany

“The promotion of cycling benefits everyone, including pedestrians and motorists. Cycling is an environmentally friendly means of transport that does not produce noise or harmful emissions.It requires little space.In combination with local public transport and walking, it makes it possible to reduce [vehicle] traffic, especially in city centres, thereby tackling congestion and lowering pollutant and noise emissions.”

Münster

Münster Bike Station

• 3,300 bike parking spaces (largest garage in Germany)

• Importance of intermodalism

Münster

Münster

Lessons Learned

Lessons Learned

HSR has distinct advantages over other modes of travel. We must be clear about these advantages and design to take full advantage of them.

Stations should be sited in dense urban districts that are preeminent destinations and central nodes of urban transit networks.

Extensive planning work may make other locations feasible, but existing infrastructure and/or development are usually preconditions for success.

Lessons Learned

There are tradeoffs between maximizing travel speeds and connections.

Secondary stations in large cities can bring HSR closer to many without significantly slowing service.

Lessons Learned

Station buildings need to be well-designed and large enough to serve multiple public purposes. Financing such structures is challenging.

It is essential to articulate vision for project first and figure out how to realize vision within constraints.

Lessons Learned

Innovations in payment systems can blur the divide between public transit and the private car and enhance the competitiveness of non-auto modes.

Fragmented governance in transit leads not simply to poorly coordinated schedules among providers, but also to intermodal facilities that are inefficient and difficult to navigate.

Bicycles can be a cost-effective and space-efficient access mode to HSR, but supportive policies and infrastructure must be provided.

Lessons Learned

HSR can be transformational in terms of development.

Most of California’s planned HSR stations are in places that are centrally located, have significant development potential, and are anticipating rapid population growth.

California’s HSR system will not mature for many decades. We must be careful not to make decisions that we will regret in 50 years.

eric.eidlin@dot.gov urbancurrent.org/author/ericeidlin

BEYOND THE PARK-AND-RIDE LOTLessons for California on High Speed Rail from France and Germany

Sou

rce:

San

na

Siis

salo

Eric Eidlin, AICP | Federal Transit Administration 2013 – 2014 German Marshall Fund Urban and Regional Policy Fellow

Rail~volution 2014 | Minneapolis, MN | September 23, 2014

Recommended