Infrastructure sustainability for rail projects

Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.

Creating a nationally consistent approach to project sustainability across the asset lifecycle David Singleton, Chairman, ISCA

Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Scheme

• Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (formerly Australian Green Infrastructure Council)

• Member based, not-for-profit, industry council

Enhancing the liveability and productivity of our major cities and our regional communities through advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.

2

ISCA: overview

ISCA Members

3

ISCA Members (cont’d)

4

5 5

ISCA Board and officers

David Singleton Chairman

Mark Rogers Deputy Chairman

Scott Lambert Company Secretary

Russel Cuttler Director

Anne Davis Director

Nick Fleming Director

Menno Henneveld Director

Scott Losee Director

Penny Townley Director

Jayne Whitney Director

Rick Walters Technical Director

Antony Sprigg Chief Executive Officer

Emergence of infrastructure sustainability rating schemes

UK Australia United States

International

IS Scheme Drivers

ISCA will achieve its mission through: • Continuing to improve and expand the IS rating scheme in

line with industry needs and lessons learnt from current experiences

• Collaborating with government agencies regarding the “upstream” use of the IS rating scheme

• Promoting and facilitating national training, education and knowledge sharing relating to infrastructure sustainability along the entire supply chain

• Contributing, facilitating and promoting industry forums and research on key policy and advocacy issues relating to infrastructure sustainability challenges and opportunities

8

ISCA Objectives

• Common national language for sustainability in infrastructure

• Consistent application and evaluation of sustainability in tendering processes

• Scoping whole-of-life sustainability risks for projects and assets, enabling smarter solutions that reduce risks and costs

• Fosters resource efficiency and waste reduction, reducing costs

• Fosters innovation and continuous improvement • Builds an organisation’s credentials and reputation in

its approach to sustainability in infrastructure

9

Benefits of ISCA’s IS Scheme

IS Rating Scheme • (IS) rating tool comprises

• Rating Tool Scorecard • Materials Calculator • Technical Manual

• Assessment process involves • Registration • Assessment support • Independent Verification • Certification and rating award

• Education and training programmes • IS Accredited Professional

10

IS Overview

• First and only national sustainability rating tool for infrastructure

• Measures sustainability performance across the quadruple bottom line (environmental, social, economic and governance)

• Voluntary scheme

11

Infrastructure Types

Transport • Airports • Cycleways & Footpaths • Ports & Harbours • Roads • Railways

Communication • Communication Networks

Water • Sewerage & Drainage • Storage & Supply

Energy • Electricity Transmission &

Distribution • Gas Pipelines

12

13

Scheme Coverage

NSW: – Shannon Dam – Lithgow STP – Kingsgrove to Revesby Quadruplication – Glenfield Transport Interchange – Inner West Busway along Victoria Road

VIC: – City Link Freeway – Eastern Tertiary Alliance (STP) – Toorourrong Reservoir Upgrade

14

Pilot Trials

QLD: – Logan Water Main – Eastern Busway – Southport Broadwater Parklands – Northern Busway

WA: – Great Eastern Highway Upgrade,

Belmont – Great Eastern Highway/Roe

Highway Interchange ACT:

– Enlarged Cotter Dam

Themes & Categories

15

Themes Categories

Management and Governance

Management Systems Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adaptation

Using Resources Energy and Carbon Water Materials

Emissions, Pollution and Waste

Discharges to Air, Land and Water Land Waste

Ecology Ecology

People and Place

Community Health, Well-being and Safety Heritage Stakeholder Participation Urban and Landscape Design

Innovation Innovation

Theme Category

Management and Governance Management Systems Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adaptation

Using Resources Energy and Carbon Water Materials

Emissions, Pollution and Waste Discharges to Air, Land and Water Land Waste

Ecology Ecology

People and Place

Community Health, Well-being and Safety Heritage Stakeholder Participation Urban and Landscape Design

Innovation Innovation

16

Tool Development

BS 8903:2010 - world’s best practice in sustainable procurement Own category – important

due to inherent longevity

Aligns with EEO and NGERS

Lifecycle analysis based Materials calculator

Aligned with Green Star Communities References the Australian

Urban Design Protocol

Further Pilot Trials of Operational Rating • IPWEA trialling IS rating tool for local council

operations and maintenance Future Themes • Economic • Workforce Improvements to Existing Tool • Update the Climate Change Adaptation category • Update the Using Resources theme

17

Current Tool Development

Theme Category

Management and Governance Management Systems Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adaptation

Using Resources Energy and Carbon Water Materials

Emissions, Pollution and Waste Discharges to Air, Land and Water Land Waste

Ecology Ecology

People and Place

Community Health, Well-being and Safety Heritage Stakeholder Participation Urban and Landscape Design

Innovation Innovation

18

Tool Highlights

Procurement policies PQQ

Climate change risk assessment

Carbon footprint Opportunities study

Environmental flows at nearby park

Community and key stakeholder participation - 8 indigenous groups. Heritage values beyond government registers addressed

Decision Making “Applying the rating tool, our organisation has developed significant learning and is currently reviewing all design and construction related processes to embed this learning so that improved project outcomes can be achieved during the design, construction and operations of projects. For example, the requirement to review climate change risks and identify adaptation strategies for high to very-high climate change risks will be embedded into our existing Design Opportunity and Risk process.” “The IS rating tool changed the way in which we have gone about procuring materials for the project. We are confident that the changes that we have made will lead the wider supply industry to more sustainable outcomes.”

19

What some current users say:

Direct Benefits and Outcomes “Designs that used less concrete, less steel and resulted in less embodied carbon emissions and reuse of existing onsite wastes and designs that addressed climate change risks.” “Helped us to challenge the status quo in regard to design. We have identified opportunities to minimise material usage along with associated stakeholder and energy impacts.” “The sustainability initiatives collectively add significant value at nil-marginal additional cost.” “There was no additional cost to the project as a result of pursuing the rating.”

20

What some current users say:

Credibility “The IS rating tool provides our organisation with independent recognition for the sustainable process and plan that we adopted for the project. As this is an outside body rating the projects sustainability performance, better recognition of our organisation’s sustainability systems is achieved.”

Tendering “The IS tool supported the establishment of rigorous tender requirements relating to climate risk, resource use, innovation, community initiatives and supply chain management. Accordingly our organisation will look to specify IS tool performance requirements within respective contract documents to assist with performance monitoring.”

21

What some current users say:

Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.

Project Rating

www.isca.org.au

23

Rating Types

Rating Type:

Project Phase: Planning & Design Construction Operation

Design Rating Operation Rating

As Built Rating

• Design • As Built • Operation

Rating Levels

24

Score Rating Level

< 25 Not eligible to apply for a certified rating

25 - 49 Commended

50 - 74 Excellent

75 - 100 Leading

25

Scheme Coverage

26

Rating Process

• Submit Registration of Interest • Sign Rating Agreement • Pay Registration and Support Fees

• Covers review to ensure eligibility, administration, website promotion, agreement, packaging

• ISCA Case Manager Assigned • Rating Profile • Register Early

Registration

27

• Kick-off workshop with ISCA case manager and the project/asset management team • Establish project/asset parameters • Clarify scope and timing • Scope out credits • Discuss Reference Design

• Self-assessment using the IS rating tool • Management team determine rating and collate evidence • IS Accredited Professional may lead the process and preparation

of the submission • ISCA provides technical support :

• Technical Clarifications • Credit Interpretation Requests

28

Assessment

• May or may not be an ISAP • Complete registration • Understand the rating process • Guide and work with management team to self-

assess • Liaise with ISCA • Submit appropriate and organised documentation • Work with proponent to comply with rating use once

awarded

Assessors Role

29

• Submit assessment to ISCA at the end of major milestones for independent verification

• ISCA reviews submission to check it conforms to submission requirements

• ISCA arranges independent verification • One round of feedback – accept the results of the

verification or update submission • Final submission and verification

Verification

p 30 30

• Verifiers make a recommendation which is reviewed by ISCA

• Subject to meeting requirements, ISCA will certify the achievement of a rating as ‘Commended’, ‘Excellent’ or ‘Leading’ performance

• ISCA will issue and promote the rating • Appeals process available if dissatisfied with the

rating or the process

Certification

p 30 31

After Rating - The IS Badge

• A project/asset can only refer to its IS rating if it has been formally certified by ISCA

• The IS symbol and IS badge are trademarks and must be appropriately used

32

Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.

Project Registrations

www.isca.org.au

Current IS Rating Registrations

34

Project Location Rating Asset Status Est Cap

Value

Enlarged Cotter Dam ACT As Built Water Supply Registered $300m

Whitsundays STP Upgrade QLD Design Sewerage Certified $45m

Great Eastern Highway Upgrade WA As Built Road Registered $300m

North West Rail Link NSW Design As Built

Operation Railway Registered $6-7bn

Rous Head Business Park WA As Built Port Registered $15m

Gold Coast Light Rail (Stage 1) QLD As Built Railway Registered $437m

Gateway WA – Perth Airport & Freight Access WA Design

As Built Road Registered $1bn

Enlarged Cotter Dam

35

Proponent: ACTEW

Contractor: Bulk Water Alliance (JHG, Abigroup, GHD, ACTEW)

Infrastructure Type: Water Storage & Supply

Rating Type: As Built

Location: ACT

Capital Value: $299m

Start Date: 2008

Practical Completion: 2013

An Enlarged Cotter Dam is being built downstream of the existing dam to increase the Cotter Reservoir’s capacity from 4GL to 78GL. The Enlarged Cotter Dam forms part of ACTEW’s continued response to ensuring a secure water supply for the ACT and to address drought, climate change and variability.

Great Eastern Highway Upgrade

36

Proponent: Main Roads WA (MRWA)

Contractor: City East Alliance (MRWA, Leighton Cont., GHD, NRW)

Infrastructure Type: Road

Rating Type: As Built

Location: Perth, WA

Capital Value: $350m

Start Date: July 2011

Practical Completion: March 2013

A 4.2km section of the Great Eastern Highway between Kooyong Road and Tonkin Highway widened from four to six lanes with a number of ancillary improvements including central medians, upgraded intersections, on road cycling facilities, bus priority lanes and continuous paths for pedestrians.

Great Eastern Highway Upgrade - stories

• Concrete/bricks from demolished Midvale buildings crushed to road base - used for airport carpark

• Warm mix asphalt • Increased elevation for climate adaptation • 145 year old convict road discovered – jarrah

wooden discs • Public art monument in Hardey Park reflects an aerial

view of the Swan River and the rolling hills

37

Rous Head Industrial Park

38

Proponent: Fremantle Ports

Contractor: Brierty Ltd

Infrastructure Type: Roads (Port Infrastructure)

Rating Type: As Built

Location: WA

Capital Value: $15m

Start Date: January 2012

Practical Completion: June 2013

Development of 27 hectares of reclaimed land at Fremantle Port, comprising the partitioning of the land into five lots of various sizes, construction of the access roads and installation of the various services to the boundaries of the lots to allow tenants to develop businesses servicing the port. One of the lots will provide a truck facility which will include truck parking bays and amenities for drivers.

Proponent: GoldLinQ

Contractor: McConnell Dowell

Infrastructure Type: Light Rail

Rating Type: As Built

Location: QLD

Capital Value: $437m

Start Date: Jan 2012

Practical Completion: 2014

39

Development of a light rail system that passes through key health, educational and residential precincts. Stage One works will carry passengers along the 13-kilometre light rail corridor, connecting them from the Gold Coast University Hospital and Griffith University (Health and Knowledge precinct) to the fast growing commercial, retail and recreational centres of Southport, Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

Gold Coast Light Rail (Stage 1)

40

Gold Coast Light Rail

GatewayWA

41

Proponent: Main Roads WA (MRWA)

Design and Construction:

Gateway WA Alliance (MRWA, Leighton Cont., Georgiou, AECOM, BG&E, GHD)

Infrastructure Type: Roads and Bridges

Rating Type: Design and As Built

Location: Perth, WA

Capital Value: $1bn

Start Date: November 2012

Practical Completion: 2017

This, the largest infrastructure project ever undertaken by Main Roads WA, is a billion-dollar project involving a major upgrade to the road network surrounding Perth Airport and the freight and industrial hubs of Kewdale and Forrestfield.

Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.

Project Ratings Certified

www.isca.org.au

Certified rating Whitsunday STP Upgrades

43

Proponent: Whitsunday Regional Council

Contractor: Tenix

Infrastructure Type: Sewage treatment

Rating Type: Design

Location: Whitsundays, QLD

Capital Value: $45m

Start Date: May 2012

Practical Completion: May 2014

Upgrade of 2 treatment plants at Proserpine and Cannonvale to serve growing communities and meet stringent effluent discharge requirements to protect the GBR. They will also reduce sewage overflows, and improve noise and odour

Whitsunday STP Upgrades – Highlights

44

Category/ Credit Score Achievements

Management Systems 7.3/10.5

• Good management systems integrating the IS rating tool into practices

• Knowledge sharing clearly demonstrated

Procurement and Purchasing 4.2/5.0

• Strong commitment to and application of sustainable procurement including local procurement:

• 50% of total spend in the Whitsunday region • 30% of total spend in greater Queensland

Climate Change Adaptation

4.2/5.0 • Did a thorough, formal climate change risk assessment

and implemented controls to reduce 22 ‘high’ or ‘very high’ risks to a ‘moderate’ or ‘low’ rating

Energy and Carbon 5.1/10.5

• 305 MWh electricity saved over operational life – thus a 14% reduction equating to $75,000 saving/year

• 14,000 tCO2-e avoided over lifecycle • Use of B20 Biodiesel avoiding 272 tCO2-e (cost neutral)

Whitsunday STP Upgrades – Highlights

45

Category/ Credit Score Achievements

Water 3.9/7.0 • 15% reduction in water use over lifecycle, with associated cost benefit

Materials 7.0/7.0

• Reduced the materials footprint by 25%: • Used 4,329 tonnes less concrete • Used 298 tonnes less steel • Used eco-cement with 30% fly ash • Eliminated asphalt from the design

Receiving Water Quality 2.9/2.9

• >75% reduction in N and >90% reduction in P (44 tonnes less nutrients annually) to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park

Ecological Value 2.0/2.0 • Ecological value enhanced through >5,000 m2 of

regenerated native habitat and 1000 m2 of wetland

Whitsunday STP Upgrades – Highlights

46

Category/ Credit Score Achievements

Innovation 5.0/5.0

• World’s-first trial of Parallel Nitrification & De-Nitrification (PND):

• Significantly improves nitrogen removal • More compact • Less construction materials • More energy efficient

Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.

ISCA PO Box Q80 QBV NSW 1230 info@isca.org.au www.isca.org.au

Thank you