Upload
informa-australia
View
1.473
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.
Creating a nationally consistent approach to project sustainability across the asset lifecycle David Singleton, Chairman, ISCA
Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Scheme
• Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (formerly Australian Green Infrastructure Council)
• Member based, not-for-profit, industry council
Enhancing the liveability and productivity of our major cities and our regional communities through advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.
2
ISCA: overview
ISCA Members
3
ISCA Members (cont’d)
4
5 5
ISCA Board and officers
David Singleton Chairman
Mark Rogers Deputy Chairman
Scott Lambert Company Secretary
Russel Cuttler Director
Anne Davis Director
Nick Fleming Director
Menno Henneveld Director
Scott Losee Director
Penny Townley Director
Jayne Whitney Director
Rick Walters Technical Director
Antony Sprigg Chief Executive Officer
Emergence of infrastructure sustainability rating schemes
UK Australia United States
International
IS Scheme Drivers
ISCA will achieve its mission through: • Continuing to improve and expand the IS rating scheme in
line with industry needs and lessons learnt from current experiences
• Collaborating with government agencies regarding the “upstream” use of the IS rating scheme
• Promoting and facilitating national training, education and knowledge sharing relating to infrastructure sustainability along the entire supply chain
• Contributing, facilitating and promoting industry forums and research on key policy and advocacy issues relating to infrastructure sustainability challenges and opportunities
8
ISCA Objectives
• Common national language for sustainability in infrastructure
• Consistent application and evaluation of sustainability in tendering processes
• Scoping whole-of-life sustainability risks for projects and assets, enabling smarter solutions that reduce risks and costs
• Fosters resource efficiency and waste reduction, reducing costs
• Fosters innovation and continuous improvement • Builds an organisation’s credentials and reputation in
its approach to sustainability in infrastructure
9
Benefits of ISCA’s IS Scheme
IS Rating Scheme • (IS) rating tool comprises
• Rating Tool Scorecard • Materials Calculator • Technical Manual
• Assessment process involves • Registration • Assessment support • Independent Verification • Certification and rating award
• Education and training programmes • IS Accredited Professional
10
IS Overview
• First and only national sustainability rating tool for infrastructure
• Measures sustainability performance across the quadruple bottom line (environmental, social, economic and governance)
• Voluntary scheme
11
Infrastructure Types
Transport • Airports • Cycleways & Footpaths • Ports & Harbours • Roads • Railways
Communication • Communication Networks
Water • Sewerage & Drainage • Storage & Supply
Energy • Electricity Transmission &
Distribution • Gas Pipelines
12
13
Scheme Coverage
NSW: – Shannon Dam – Lithgow STP – Kingsgrove to Revesby Quadruplication – Glenfield Transport Interchange – Inner West Busway along Victoria Road
VIC: – City Link Freeway – Eastern Tertiary Alliance (STP) – Toorourrong Reservoir Upgrade
14
Pilot Trials
QLD: – Logan Water Main – Eastern Busway – Southport Broadwater Parklands – Northern Busway
WA: – Great Eastern Highway Upgrade,
Belmont – Great Eastern Highway/Roe
Highway Interchange ACT:
– Enlarged Cotter Dam
Themes & Categories
15
Themes Categories
Management and Governance
Management Systems Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adaptation
Using Resources Energy and Carbon Water Materials
Emissions, Pollution and Waste
Discharges to Air, Land and Water Land Waste
Ecology Ecology
People and Place
Community Health, Well-being and Safety Heritage Stakeholder Participation Urban and Landscape Design
Innovation Innovation
Theme Category
Management and Governance Management Systems Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adaptation
Using Resources Energy and Carbon Water Materials
Emissions, Pollution and Waste Discharges to Air, Land and Water Land Waste
Ecology Ecology
People and Place
Community Health, Well-being and Safety Heritage Stakeholder Participation Urban and Landscape Design
Innovation Innovation
16
Tool Development
BS 8903:2010 - world’s best practice in sustainable procurement Own category – important
due to inherent longevity
Aligns with EEO and NGERS
Lifecycle analysis based Materials calculator
Aligned with Green Star Communities References the Australian
Urban Design Protocol
Further Pilot Trials of Operational Rating • IPWEA trialling IS rating tool for local council
operations and maintenance Future Themes • Economic • Workforce Improvements to Existing Tool • Update the Climate Change Adaptation category • Update the Using Resources theme
17
Current Tool Development
Theme Category
Management and Governance Management Systems Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adaptation
Using Resources Energy and Carbon Water Materials
Emissions, Pollution and Waste Discharges to Air, Land and Water Land Waste
Ecology Ecology
People and Place
Community Health, Well-being and Safety Heritage Stakeholder Participation Urban and Landscape Design
Innovation Innovation
18
Tool Highlights
Procurement policies PQQ
Climate change risk assessment
Carbon footprint Opportunities study
Environmental flows at nearby park
Community and key stakeholder participation - 8 indigenous groups. Heritage values beyond government registers addressed
Decision Making “Applying the rating tool, our organisation has developed significant learning and is currently reviewing all design and construction related processes to embed this learning so that improved project outcomes can be achieved during the design, construction and operations of projects. For example, the requirement to review climate change risks and identify adaptation strategies for high to very-high climate change risks will be embedded into our existing Design Opportunity and Risk process.” “The IS rating tool changed the way in which we have gone about procuring materials for the project. We are confident that the changes that we have made will lead the wider supply industry to more sustainable outcomes.”
19
What some current users say:
Direct Benefits and Outcomes “Designs that used less concrete, less steel and resulted in less embodied carbon emissions and reuse of existing onsite wastes and designs that addressed climate change risks.” “Helped us to challenge the status quo in regard to design. We have identified opportunities to minimise material usage along with associated stakeholder and energy impacts.” “The sustainability initiatives collectively add significant value at nil-marginal additional cost.” “There was no additional cost to the project as a result of pursuing the rating.”
20
What some current users say:
Credibility “The IS rating tool provides our organisation with independent recognition for the sustainable process and plan that we adopted for the project. As this is an outside body rating the projects sustainability performance, better recognition of our organisation’s sustainability systems is achieved.”
Tendering “The IS tool supported the establishment of rigorous tender requirements relating to climate risk, resource use, innovation, community initiatives and supply chain management. Accordingly our organisation will look to specify IS tool performance requirements within respective contract documents to assist with performance monitoring.”
21
What some current users say:
Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.
Project Rating
www.isca.org.au
23
Rating Types
Rating Type:
Project Phase: Planning & Design Construction Operation
Design Rating Operation Rating
As Built Rating
• Design • As Built • Operation
Rating Levels
24
Score Rating Level
< 25 Not eligible to apply for a certified rating
25 - 49 Commended
50 - 74 Excellent
75 - 100 Leading
25
Scheme Coverage
26
Rating Process
• Submit Registration of Interest • Sign Rating Agreement • Pay Registration and Support Fees
• Covers review to ensure eligibility, administration, website promotion, agreement, packaging
• ISCA Case Manager Assigned • Rating Profile • Register Early
Registration
27
• Kick-off workshop with ISCA case manager and the project/asset management team • Establish project/asset parameters • Clarify scope and timing • Scope out credits • Discuss Reference Design
• Self-assessment using the IS rating tool • Management team determine rating and collate evidence • IS Accredited Professional may lead the process and preparation
of the submission • ISCA provides technical support :
• Technical Clarifications • Credit Interpretation Requests
28
Assessment
• May or may not be an ISAP • Complete registration • Understand the rating process • Guide and work with management team to self-
assess • Liaise with ISCA • Submit appropriate and organised documentation • Work with proponent to comply with rating use once
awarded
Assessors Role
29
• Submit assessment to ISCA at the end of major milestones for independent verification
• ISCA reviews submission to check it conforms to submission requirements
• ISCA arranges independent verification • One round of feedback – accept the results of the
verification or update submission • Final submission and verification
Verification
p 30 30
• Verifiers make a recommendation which is reviewed by ISCA
• Subject to meeting requirements, ISCA will certify the achievement of a rating as ‘Commended’, ‘Excellent’ or ‘Leading’ performance
• ISCA will issue and promote the rating • Appeals process available if dissatisfied with the
rating or the process
Certification
p 30 31
After Rating - The IS Badge
• A project/asset can only refer to its IS rating if it has been formally certified by ISCA
• The IS symbol and IS badge are trademarks and must be appropriately used
32
Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.
Project Registrations
www.isca.org.au
Current IS Rating Registrations
34
Project Location Rating Asset Status Est Cap
Value
Enlarged Cotter Dam ACT As Built Water Supply Registered $300m
Whitsundays STP Upgrade QLD Design Sewerage Certified $45m
Great Eastern Highway Upgrade WA As Built Road Registered $300m
North West Rail Link NSW Design As Built
Operation Railway Registered $6-7bn
Rous Head Business Park WA As Built Port Registered $15m
Gold Coast Light Rail (Stage 1) QLD As Built Railway Registered $437m
Gateway WA – Perth Airport & Freight Access WA Design
As Built Road Registered $1bn
Enlarged Cotter Dam
35
Proponent: ACTEW
Contractor: Bulk Water Alliance (JHG, Abigroup, GHD, ACTEW)
Infrastructure Type: Water Storage & Supply
Rating Type: As Built
Location: ACT
Capital Value: $299m
Start Date: 2008
Practical Completion: 2013
An Enlarged Cotter Dam is being built downstream of the existing dam to increase the Cotter Reservoir’s capacity from 4GL to 78GL. The Enlarged Cotter Dam forms part of ACTEW’s continued response to ensuring a secure water supply for the ACT and to address drought, climate change and variability.
Great Eastern Highway Upgrade
36
Proponent: Main Roads WA (MRWA)
Contractor: City East Alliance (MRWA, Leighton Cont., GHD, NRW)
Infrastructure Type: Road
Rating Type: As Built
Location: Perth, WA
Capital Value: $350m
Start Date: July 2011
Practical Completion: March 2013
A 4.2km section of the Great Eastern Highway between Kooyong Road and Tonkin Highway widened from four to six lanes with a number of ancillary improvements including central medians, upgraded intersections, on road cycling facilities, bus priority lanes and continuous paths for pedestrians.
Great Eastern Highway Upgrade - stories
• Concrete/bricks from demolished Midvale buildings crushed to road base - used for airport carpark
• Warm mix asphalt • Increased elevation for climate adaptation • 145 year old convict road discovered – jarrah
wooden discs • Public art monument in Hardey Park reflects an aerial
view of the Swan River and the rolling hills
37
Rous Head Industrial Park
38
Proponent: Fremantle Ports
Contractor: Brierty Ltd
Infrastructure Type: Roads (Port Infrastructure)
Rating Type: As Built
Location: WA
Capital Value: $15m
Start Date: January 2012
Practical Completion: June 2013
Development of 27 hectares of reclaimed land at Fremantle Port, comprising the partitioning of the land into five lots of various sizes, construction of the access roads and installation of the various services to the boundaries of the lots to allow tenants to develop businesses servicing the port. One of the lots will provide a truck facility which will include truck parking bays and amenities for drivers.
Proponent: GoldLinQ
Contractor: McConnell Dowell
Infrastructure Type: Light Rail
Rating Type: As Built
Location: QLD
Capital Value: $437m
Start Date: Jan 2012
Practical Completion: 2014
39
Development of a light rail system that passes through key health, educational and residential precincts. Stage One works will carry passengers along the 13-kilometre light rail corridor, connecting them from the Gold Coast University Hospital and Griffith University (Health and Knowledge precinct) to the fast growing commercial, retail and recreational centres of Southport, Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.
Gold Coast Light Rail (Stage 1)
40
Gold Coast Light Rail
GatewayWA
41
Proponent: Main Roads WA (MRWA)
Design and Construction:
Gateway WA Alliance (MRWA, Leighton Cont., Georgiou, AECOM, BG&E, GHD)
Infrastructure Type: Roads and Bridges
Rating Type: Design and As Built
Location: Perth, WA
Capital Value: $1bn
Start Date: November 2012
Practical Completion: 2017
This, the largest infrastructure project ever undertaken by Main Roads WA, is a billion-dollar project involving a major upgrade to the road network surrounding Perth Airport and the freight and industrial hubs of Kewdale and Forrestfield.
Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.
Project Ratings Certified
www.isca.org.au
Certified rating Whitsunday STP Upgrades
43
Proponent: Whitsunday Regional Council
Contractor: Tenix
Infrastructure Type: Sewage treatment
Rating Type: Design
Location: Whitsundays, QLD
Capital Value: $45m
Start Date: May 2012
Practical Completion: May 2014
Upgrade of 2 treatment plants at Proserpine and Cannonvale to serve growing communities and meet stringent effluent discharge requirements to protect the GBR. They will also reduce sewage overflows, and improve noise and odour
Whitsunday STP Upgrades – Highlights
44
Category/ Credit Score Achievements
Management Systems 7.3/10.5
• Good management systems integrating the IS rating tool into practices
• Knowledge sharing clearly demonstrated
Procurement and Purchasing 4.2/5.0
• Strong commitment to and application of sustainable procurement including local procurement:
• 50% of total spend in the Whitsunday region • 30% of total spend in greater Queensland
Climate Change Adaptation
4.2/5.0 • Did a thorough, formal climate change risk assessment
and implemented controls to reduce 22 ‘high’ or ‘very high’ risks to a ‘moderate’ or ‘low’ rating
Energy and Carbon 5.1/10.5
• 305 MWh electricity saved over operational life – thus a 14% reduction equating to $75,000 saving/year
• 14,000 tCO2-e avoided over lifecycle • Use of B20 Biodiesel avoiding 272 tCO2-e (cost neutral)
Whitsunday STP Upgrades – Highlights
45
Category/ Credit Score Achievements
Water 3.9/7.0 • 15% reduction in water use over lifecycle, with associated cost benefit
Materials 7.0/7.0
• Reduced the materials footprint by 25%: • Used 4,329 tonnes less concrete • Used 298 tonnes less steel • Used eco-cement with 30% fly ash • Eliminated asphalt from the design
Receiving Water Quality 2.9/2.9
• >75% reduction in N and >90% reduction in P (44 tonnes less nutrients annually) to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park
Ecological Value 2.0/2.0 • Ecological value enhanced through >5,000 m2 of
regenerated native habitat and 1000 m2 of wetland
Whitsunday STP Upgrades – Highlights
46
Category/ Credit Score Achievements
Innovation 5.0/5.0
• World’s-first trial of Parallel Nitrification & De-Nitrification (PND):
• Significantly improves nitrogen removal • More compact • Less construction materials • More energy efficient
Advancing sustainability in infrastructure planning, procurement, delivery and operation.
ISCA PO Box Q80 QBV NSW 1230 [email protected] www.isca.org.au
Thank you