View
8.751
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
HELICOPTER VIBRATION REDUCTION TECHNIQUES
A SEMINAR REPORT
Presented By: Haftamu Abraha
Feb. 2012
Agendas Covered1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Motivation
1.2 Overview of helicopter vibration
1.3 Objectives
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Loads acting on a Helicopter in flight
2
2.1 Loads acting on a Helicopter in flight
3. HELICOPTER VIBRATION REDUCTION METHODS
3.1 Passive helicopter vibration reduction
3.1.1 Blade design optimization
3.1.2 Main Rotor Gearbox Mounting Systems
3.1.3 Dynamic Response of the Fuselage
Agendas ......... (Continued)
3.2. Active helicopter vibration reduction
3.2.1 Higher harmonic control
3.2.2 Individual blade control
3.2.3 Active Control of Structural
3
3.2.3 Active Control of Structural Response (ACSR)
3.3.Semi-active vibration reduction technology
3.3.1 Overview of semi-active vibration reduction concept
Agendas ..........(Continued)
3.3.3 Helicopter vibration reduction using semi-active approach
3.3.2 Comparison between active and semi-active concepts
4
semi-active concepts
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Helicopters play an essential role in today’s aviation with unique abilities
5
today’s aviation with unique abilities to hover and take off/land vertically
These capabilities enable helicopters to carry out many distinctive tasks in both civilian and military operations.
Despite these attractive abilities, helicopter trips are usually unpleasant for passengers and crew because of high vibration level in the cabin.
6
high vibration level in the cabin.
This vibration is also responsible for
degradation in structural integrity as well as
reduction in component fatigue life
decrease the effectiveness of onboardavionics or computer systems thatare critical for aircraft primarycontrol, navigation, and weapon
7
control, navigation, and weaponsystems
Consequently, significant efforts havebeen dedicated over the last severaldecades for developing strategies toreduce helicopter vibration
A review the various techniques usedby different helicopter companies tocontrol helicopter vibrations ispresented here
8
presented here
1.2 Overview of Helicopter Vibration
Helicopter vibration generally originates from
many sources; for example,
transmission,
engine, and
9
engine, and
tail rotor
but most of the vibration comes primarily fromthe main rotor system, even with a perfectlytracked rotor.
Figure 1.1 shows a typical vibration profile of a helicopter, as a function of cruise speeds,
10
severe vibration usually occurs in two distinct flight conditions;
low speed transition flight (generally during approach for landing) and
high-speed flight.
the severe vibration level is primarily due to
11
the severe vibration level is primarily due to
impulsive loads induced by interactions between rotor blades
and strong tip vortices dominating the rotor wake (Fig. 1.2)
This condition is usually referred to as Blade Vortex Interaction (BVI)
Figure 1.2: Blade Vortex Interaction (BVI) schematic
12
Figure 1.2: Blade Vortex Interaction (BVI) schematic
In moderate-to-high speed cruise, the BVI-inducedvibration is reduced since vortices are washedfurther downstream from the rotor blades, and thevibration is caused mainly by the unsteadyaerodynamic environment in which the rotor blades
are operating.
The control of vibration is important for four main reasons:
1. To improve crew efficiency, and hence safety ofoperation;
2. To improve comfort of passengers;
3. To improve the reliability of avionics and mechanicalequipments;
13
equipments;
4. To improve the fatigue lives of airframe structuralcomponents
Hence it is very important to control vibrationthroughout
the design,
development and
in-service stages of a helicopter project
CHAPTER 3
HELICOPTER VIBRATION REDUCTION METHODS
3.1 Passive Helicopter Vibration Reduction
Most of the passive strategies produce moderatevibration reduction in certain flight conditions, andonly at some locations in the fuselage (such as, pilotonly at some locations in the fuselage (such as, pilotseats or avionics compartments)
The major advantage of the passive concepts is thatthey require no external power to operate
However, they generally involve a significant weightpenalty and are fixed in design, implying no ability toadjust to any possible change in operating conditions(such as changes in rotor RPM or aircraft forwardspeed).
14
Examples of these passive vibration reduction strategies include
tuned-mass absorbers,
isolators, and
blade design optimizations.
tuned-mass absorbers
Tuned-mass vibration absorbers can be employed
15
Tuned-mass vibration absorbers can be employedfor reducing helicopter vibration both in thefuselage and on the rotor system. The absorbersare generally designed using classical spring masssystems tuned to absorb energy at a specificfrequency, for example at N/rev, thus reducingsystem response or vibration at the tunedfrequency ( Fig. 3.1.1).
16
Figure 3.1.1: Frequency response of a dynamic system with and without an absorber
In the fuselage, the absorbers are usually employed to reduce vibration levels at pilot seats or at locations where sensitive equipment is placed. Without adding mass, an aircraft battery may be used as the mass in the absorber assembly.
For example, a helicopter known as sea king uses its battery vibration absorber
or the mass may be parasitic, as in certainmodels of the Boeing Vertol Chinookhelicopter, where five vibration absorbers
one in the nose,
two under the cockpit floor
and two inside the aft pylon are used
17
and two inside the aft pylon are used
Sea King battery vibration absorber Boeing-Vertol CH-47 "Chinook"
A centrifugal pendulum type of absorber mounted on
the rotor blade is another type . This type of absorberhas been used on the Bolkow Bo 105 and Hughes 500helicopters
Next Figure shows the Hughes installation whichconsists of absorbers tuned to the 3Ω and 5Ωexcitation frequencies for the four-bladed rotor
version,
18
version,
3.2. Active Helicopter Vibration Reduction Method
Active vibration reduction concepts have beenintroduced
with the potential to improve vibrationreduction capability and
to overcome the fixed-design drawback of the
19
to overcome the fixed-design drawback of thepassive designs
The majority of the active vibration reductionconcepts aim to reduce the vibration in the rotorsystem,
and some active methods intend to attenuate/reducethe vibration only in the fuselage
In general, an active vibration reductionsystem consists of four main components;sensors, actuators, a power supply unit,and a controller (Figure)
Actuators Sensors
ControlledStructure
20
The principle of operation is:
based on the sensor input and a mathematical modelof the system, generates an anti vibration field, thatis, as closely as possible identical to the uncontrolledvibration field but with opposite phase
Controller
If these two vibration fields (the uncontrolled and theactuator generated) were identical in amplitude andhad exact the opposite phase, then the addition of thetwo fields would lead to complete elimination of thevibrations levels
Also, the controller can be configured to adjust itselffor any possible change in operating conditions usingan adaptive control scheme.
21
an adaptive control scheme.
The most commonly examined active vibrationreduction strategies include
Higher Harmonic Control (HHC),
Individual Blade Control (IBC), and
Active Control of Structural Response (ACSR).
3.2.1 Higher Harmonic Control (HHC)
The main objective of this concept is to generate higher harmonicunsteady aerodynamic loads on the rotor blades that cancel theoriginal loads responsible for the vibration
The unsteady aerodynamic loads are introduced by adding higherharmonic pitch input through actuation of the swash plate athigher harmonics
22
higher harmonics
The rotor generates oscillatory forces which cause the fuselageto vibrate. Transducers mounted at key locations in the fuselagemeasure the vibration, and this data is analyzed by an onboardcomputer
Based upon this data, the computer generates, using optimalcontrol techniques, signals which are transmitted to a set ofactuators
Figure 3.2.2 shows diagrammatically the concept of HHC
23
Conventionally, the swash plate is used to providerotor blade collective and first harmonic cyclic pitchinputs (1/rev), which are controlled by the pilot tooperate the aircraft.
In addition to the pilot pitch inputs, the HHC systemprovides higher harmonic pitch inputs (for example;3/rev, 4/rev, and 5/rev pitch inputs for a 4-bladedrotor) through hydraulic or electromagnetic actuators,attached to the swash plate in the non-rotating frame( Fig. 3.2.3).( Fig. 3.2.3).
24
3.2.2 Individual Blade Control (IBC)
The main idea of IBC is similar to that of HHC
(generating unsteady aerodynamic loads tocancel the original vibration), but with adifferent implementation method.
25
different implementation method.
Instead of placing the actuators in the non-rotating frame (HHC concept), the IBCapproach uses actuators located in the rotatingframe to provide, for example, blade pitch,active flap, and blade twist inputs for vibrationreduction.
Schemetics of Individual Blade Control (IBC) systems are shown below:
26
(a) blade pitch, (b) active flap, and (c) blade twist controls
3.2.3 Active Control of Structural Response (ACSR)
Unlike the HHC and IBC techniques that are intendedto reduce the vibration in the rotor system, ACSRapproach is designed to attenuate the N/rev vibrationin the fuselage, and is one of the most successfulhelicopter vibration reduction methods at the presenthelicopter vibration reduction methods at the presenttime
Vibration sensors are placed at key locations in thefuselage, where minimal vibration is desired (forexample, pilot and passenger seats or avionicscompartments)
Depending on the vibration levels from the sensors, anACSR controller will calculate proper actions foractuators to reduce the vibration.
The calculated outputs will be fed toappropriate actuators, locatedthroughout the airframe, to produce thedesired active forces
Figure 3.2.5 shows the basic concept ofACSR.
28
The basis of ACSR is that, if a force F is applied to a structure at a point P and an equal and opposite force (the reaction) is applied at a point Q, then the effect will be to excite all the modes of vibration of the structure which possess relative motion between points P and Q
This requirement for relative motion in the modal response between the points where the actuator forces are applied is an essential feature of ACSR.
29
Commonly used force actuators include
electro-hydraulic
Piezoelectric, and
inertial force actuators
Extensive studies on ACSR system have been
conducted analytically and experimentally.
Recently, the ACSR technology has been incorporated in modern production helicopters such as the Westland EH101 (Fig. Application of ACSR to the Westland/Augusta Helicopter)
• sa
Steel downtube
CompositeCompliantElement
TitaniumLug End
ACSR Actuator
Hydraulic Supply
30
3.3. Semi-active Vibration Reduction Technology
Semi-active vibration reduction concepts aredeveloped to combine the advantages of both purelyactive as well as purely passive concepts.
Like purely active concepts, semi-active conceptshave the ability to adapt to changing conditions,
31
have the ability to adapt to changing conditions,avoiding performance losses seen in passive systemsin “off-design” conditions
In addition, like passive systems, semi-active systemsare considered relatively reliable and fail-safe, andrequire only very small power (compared to activesystems)
Semi-active strategies achieve vibration reduction bymodifying structural properties, stiffness or damping,of semi-active actuators
Semi-active vibration reduction concepts have alreadybeen investigated in several engineering applicationsbut only very recently has there been any focus onusing them to reduce helicopter vibration
Major differences between active and semi-activeconcepts are their actuators and associated
32
Major differences between active and semi-activeconcepts are their actuators and associatedcontrollers.
Active actuators generally provide direct active force,while semi-active actuators generate indirect semi-active force through property modification.
There are several advantages for using the semi-active concepts over the active concepts:
power requirement of the semi-active approachesis typically smaller than that of the activemethods
B/c active actuators generate direct force toovercome the external loads acting on thesystem, while semi-active actuators only modifythe structural properties of the system
33
Comparison Of the three Techniques
1. Passive Techniques
Advantages
Require No external power
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
Significant Weight Penalty
Fixed in Design-no ability to adjust to any change in flight condition
34
2. Active Techniques
Advantage
Low weight Penalty
Disadvantage
Requirement for external power Requirement for external power
3. Semi-active Technique
Advantage
like active-adapt to changing conditions
like passive- small power requirement (compared to active)
35
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUDING REMARKS
Figure 4.1 shows a comparison of the vibrationlevels of the Westland W30 helicopter withouta vibration reduction system, and when fittedwith a Flexispring rotor head absorber, and anACSR system
36
ACSR system
37
Recommended