The Pearls and Perils of For-Profit Education (Deborah Riemer)

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Education is on a fast-paced trajectory towards change, but how do institutions do it amidst an environment steeped in tradition? For-profit institutions, in particular, are bearing the brunt of an establishment fearful of change. One of the outcries frequently heard is that for-profits sacrifice academic quality for enrollment numbers. Maintaining quality, while servicing a growing population of students, is not problematic if appropriate systems are put into place that are focused on student learning, steeped in best practices, and designed for scalability. The vision for this design is inclusive of the whole, integrating a systems approach to quality that is incorporated across all levels of the academic unit ˆ the student level, faculty level, and administrator level ˆ and incorporates learning outcomes assessment within a flexible model of program design.

Citation preview

The Pearls & Perils of For-Profit Education

Deborah Riemer VP Assessment & Academic Quality

Ashford University deborah.riemer@ashford.edu

. . . unlike their public counterparts, are managed and governed by private organizations and corporations. During the past two decades, enrollment at for-profit institutions increased 225 percent. Today these institutions enroll about 12 percent of all postsecondary students, about 2.4 million as of 2010-2011 academic year.”

“For-Profit College & Universities . . .

Source: National Conference of State Legislatures (August 2012)

“For-profit institutions often provide flexible scheduling with year-round enrollment, online options, small class sizes and convenient locations. These characteristics are attracting a large and growing population of students entering the education market – particularly working adults, part-time students, and students with children.”

Source: National Conference of State Legislatures (August 2012)

For-Profit Online & Not For-Profit with Online

Setting the Stage

The State of Higher Education in the U.S.

The Pearls

Systems & Process for Academic Quality

The Perils

Jobs of the Past vs. Today

60%

20% 20%

Unskilled Semi-skilled Skilled

1950

Source: Milken Institution, 2010 Global Conference

Jobs of the Past vs. Today

15% 20%

65%

Unskilled Semi-skilled Skilled

2010

Source: Milken Institution, 2010 Global Conference

63%

50%

26% 30%

Non-Traditional Age (24 & older) by Sector For Profit Public 2 Year Public 4 Year Private 4 Year

Source: Institute for Higher Education Policy (2012)

31%

69%

44%

56%

47% 53%

44%

56%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Male Female

Axis

Titl

e Gender Enrollment by Sector

For Profit Public 2 Year Public 4 Year Private 4 Year

Source: Institute for Higher Education Policy (2012)

47%

25% 21%

60%

14% 15%

67%

12% 12%

68%

12% 12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

White Black Hispanic

Race/Ethnicity Enrollment by Sector

For Profit Public 2 Year Public 4 Year Private 4 Year

Source: Institute for Higher Education Policy (2012)

Challenges to the Sector

President of the AAUP calls for-profit colleges “THE BLOB!” (O’Malley, 2102)

High Federal Student Loan Defaults

Corporatization of Education!

Online education is inferior

Growth is too fast.

Attitude is Everything

Academic Quality Bottom Line . . .

Ashford University TOTAL: 77,734

Systems &

Processes

Components of Academic Quality

Assessment

Faculty

Students

Curriculum

Are students prepared?

Students

Are faculty prepared?

Faculty

Faculty

T R A I N I N G

Peer Review & Mentoring Faculty

Peer Review Rubric

Fostering Critical Thinking Distinguished Proficient Developing Beginning Not Observed

Instructive Feedback to Students Distinguished Proficient Developing Beginning Not Observed

High Expectations Distinguished Proficient Developing Beginning Not Observed

Establishing Relationships Distinguished Proficient Developing Beginning Not Observed

Instructor Expertise Distinguished Proficient Developing Beginning Not Observed

Faculty

Support

Faculty

Faculty Instructional Specialist Dashboard

Faculty Instructional Specialist Dashboard

Course Specific Dashboards Faculty

Curriculum

Are we developing quality courses?

Production

Course Build in LMS QA Review

Review & Approval

Copy Edit Review & Approval

Collaborative Development

Content Assessment Design

Pre-Development & Planning

Data Analysis Formal Plan & Program Context

Coordination & Calendar

Course is Live Assessment

Annual Outcomes Assessment

Action Plans for Improvement

Course Revisions Live Course

Review Electronic

Rubrics External

Quality Review

Course Development Curriculum

Course Development Team Curriculum

Executive Dean

Program Manager

Curriculum Coordinator

Faculty Member

Instructional Designer

Assessment Analyst

Document Quality Specialist

Faculty Program Chair

Education Technology Designer

Institutional Research Data &

Program Review

Curriculum

Learning Outcomes Data Curriculum Assessment

Faculty Survey Curriculum

Learning Outcomes

(5 questions)

Content & Activities

(9 questions)

Academic Resources

(11 questions) Comment Box

Internal Quality Assurance Curriculum

Grammar & Punctuation

Context

Formatting & Style

Alignment

External Quality Assurance Curriculum

Scoring Rubric Development

Curriculum Assessment

Assessment

Is it working?

Approach Assessment

Assessment Direct Measures

Learning Outcomes Assessment

Learning Outcomes Data Curriculum Assessment

Validity

Bloom’s Levels

Introduce Reinforce Mastery

Assessment

Reliability

Assessment

Curriculum Map Curriculum Assessment

Annual Program Outcomes Assessment Assessment

The Pearls

In many of our [online] courses, the median response time for a question on the question and answer forum was 22 minutes – which is not a level of service I have ever offered to my Stanford students.

TED, 2012

Scalable

Agile

Accessible “Today I cannot walk. But I can still attend class. I am so grateful to Ashford University for providing a college classroom that I can attend regardless of my physical limitations. I am so grateful it brings tears to my eyes. School means so much to me and I would not be able to do this without you. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for building this college.”

-Armada S.

Accessible “I am very thankful for Ashford University because I can attend college without leaving my house. And since my car was just smoking on my way home, I am even MORE thankful.”

Cyrstal M.

Supportive “You have a great organization. Your online curriculum has been great in helping me transition from military to civilian life, and I finally get to pursue higher learning.”

Christopher F.

Convenient “After 15 years, I am back in school. I am majoring in Sociology and going for a bachelor’s degree at Ashford. I am a single mother of two and I am so happy to be doing something to better my future.”

-Dominique W.

Mobile “I am finished with classes and I want to thank all of the instructors that I have had over the past couple of years. Attending classes at Ashford has been a great experience. I am thankful for where technology has taken us – to help working individuals such as myself attend school in an online atmosphere, and to help me finish my BA degree. Thanks again!”

Angela P.

Opens Doors “Thanks to my nearly complete associate’s degree, I have been offered an assistant manager position instead of the internship position that I applied for. I am thankful for Ashford University and its dedication to adult learners.”

Varita S.

Responsive “I think Ashford is a great school. I have recommended it to several of my friends. I feel I have learned so much. If I have ever had problems, they are usually resolved quickly. Thanks Ashford for making my dream possible!”

-Amanda O.

This school has changed my life.

- Michael B.

Meeting the Growing Global Demands for Education

Recommended