ZAO ZAVOD TARNYKH IZDELIY ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 1 PACKAGE COSTS MANAGEMENT...

1

ZAO ZAVOD TARNYKH IZDELIYЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ

PACKAGE COSTS MANAGEMENT

«LUBRICANTS RUSSIA – 2007»

Speaker:

Commercial Director

Alexandra Anikina

2

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● INTRODUCTION

• Possible ways of cost reduction in core products manufacturing:

1) Use of new schemes of cooperation – e.g., outsourcing of package

2) Innovations implementation – new, more “fresh” package type

3

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● REASONS FOR SHIFT TO OUTSOURCING

30%

29%14%

14%

13%

Operational costs reduction

Focus on mainstream business

Qualified personal search problem

Quality enchancement

Avoiding extra investments

4

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● COSTS 1:

Costs Quality

• Oilcans producing machine

Own production Outsourcing

Costs Quality

5

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● COSTS 2:

• Individual press-form

Own production Outsourcing

COSTS =

form value

translationssearching

adjustment exploitation

+

+

+

COSTS =

form value

6

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● COSTS 3:

• Infrastructure

Own production Outsourcing

building

personnel

territory

energy

air

water

7

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● COSTS 4:

• Personnel

Own production Outsourcing

occupancy 75% compensation 100% occupancy 100% compensation 100%

8

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● COSTS 5:

• Non-core production issues

Own production Outsourcing

9

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

●INNOVATIONS IMPLEMENTATION

• Cost reduction by use of more “fresh” package typeLet’s consider one of the models in ZTI product line - L-Ring container

10

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● PACKAGE LIFECYCLE

Utilization

Exploitation

Acquisition

11

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● ПРИОБРЕТЕНИЕ

• Universal catching devices

TransportationNB:

12

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИЯ

• Corrosion endurance

13

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИЯ

• Limitless storage

14

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИЯ

• Shockproof

15

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИЯ

• Average quantity of lifecycles for metal container is about 3, for plastic - 10

16

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИЯ

• Quantity of containers, loadable into euro-wagon is equal for both

80 pcs 80 pcs

17

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● EXPLOITATION

• You can carry over 840 l of product more

840 l more

216,5 l x 80 = 17320 l

227 l x 80 = 18160 l

18

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● EXPLOITATION

• You can carry over 840 kg of product more

Больше на 840кг

19кг x 80 = 1520кг

8,5кг x 80 = 680кг

19

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● UTILIZATION

• You can get 2550$ instead of 720$

1790$ more

19 kg х 0,08$ x 500 = 760$

8,5 kg х 0,6$ x 500 = 2550$

20

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● COMPARISON SUMMARY

Feature Metal euro-container Plastic euro-container Notes

Corrosion endurance

Diminish in time 100%

ShockproofnessWrinkle and loose corrosion endurance

Stans fall from the height of 1.9 m

Loadable into wagon

80 pcs 80 pcs

Total package volume in wagon

17320 l 18160 l Difference 840 l

Вес тары в фуре 1520 кг 680 кг Difference 840 kg

Lifecycles 3 10Max. Quantity. Moreover, fatal damage during exploitation is more possible for metal container

Catching device Pecker Pecker Modernization is not required

Worth as waste 720 $ 2550 $Thin metal is not willingly accepted to waste. But not plastic.

21

ЗАО ЗАВОД ТАРНЫХ ИЗДЕЛИЙ 2007

● CONCLUSION